Case Number Parties Short Description
1
Rattan Ali Howlader -vs- Afsar uddin Howlader and others.
Rule is discharged
2
Syed Belayet Hossain - Vs - Mustafizur Rahman
Rule is discharged
3
Mosammat Rowshan Ara - Vs - Md. Altaf Hossain and others
Rule is discharged
4
Amena Begum Himu -Vs - Masuma Begum and another
Rule is discharged
5
Md. Abdul Khalek alias Malek and others -Vs - Md. Golam Mostafa and anothers
Disposed of
6
Sirajul Islam -Vs- Md. Ruhul Amin and others
Rule is Discharged
7
Chittoranjan Pal and others -Vs - Sheikh Emran and others
Disposed of
8
Md. Habibur Rahman - Vs- Akramul Haque Chowdhury and others
Disposed of
9
Md. Alimuddin -Vs- Md A. Jalil and others
Disposed of
10
Md. Afaz Uddin and others Vs- Mst. Jubeda Khatun and others
The Rule is disposed of. The learned Assistant Judge, Goforgaon, Mymensingh is hereby directed to dispose of Title Suit No. 113 of 2020 as early as possible if, in the meantime, same is not otherwise disposed of and both the parties are directed to maintain status quo in respect of possession of the suit land till disposal of the suit.
11
Md. Mahabubur Rahman Talukder vs- Md. Oli Ullah (Oannu)
Rule is disposed of without any order as to cost. The learned Senior Assistant Judge, Kalapara, Patuakhali is hereby directed to dispose of Civil Suit No 1272 of 2021 as early as possible preferably within 06 (six) months from the date of receipt of this judgment and order and the parties are directed to maintain status quo in respect of possession of the suit land till disposal of the suit.
12
Kanu Das and another Vs- Rahul Dutta and others
Absolute
13
Md. Shakim Uddin Talukder and others vs- Md. Easin Talukder and others
The Rule is disposed of without any order as to cost. The learned Senior Assistant Judge, Bhaluka, Mymensingh is hereby directed to dispose of the Other Class Suit No. 60 of 2022 as early as possible if, in the meantime, the same is not otherwise disposed of and the parties are directed to maintain status quo in respect of possession of the suit land till disposal of the suit.
14
Md. Kamaruddahar Tokon and others -vs- Subrato Kumar Ghosh and others.
Rule discharged
15
Md. Liton Mia vs- The state
Absolute
16
Md. Jane Alam vs The state
Absolute
17
Mohammad Sohel vs- The State
In view of the above discussion, this appeal is allowed summarily and the order dated 05.01.2025 passed by the learned judge of the Tribunal in Nari-O-Shishu Nirjatan Daman Case No. 702 of 2018 is set aside. It is further ordered that the learned judge of the Tribunal shall summon the prosecution witnesses No. 1-6 to provide the appellant an opportunity to cross-examine them.
18
Miraz Ali and others - vs- Tarafdar Mahmudur Rahman represented by the Deputy Commissioner, Sherpur and others.
An application under order XXXIX Rule 2(3) of the Code of Civil Procedure Violation of the Court`s order Arising out of Civil Revision No.2850 of 2024
19
Abdul Khaleque and others -vs- Additional Deputy Commissioner, Barisal
Rule is discharged
20
Monwar Sadat and another -vs - The State and another
Discharged
21
The State -vs- Sajib Khan and others
A) Death Reference No. 94 of 2016 is rejected; B) Criminal Appeal No. 6881 of 2016, Criminal Appeal No. 6937 of 2016, Jail Appeal No. 253 of 2016, Jail Appeal No. 254 of 2016, and Jail Appeal No. 47 of 2017 are dismissed with modification of the sentences. The Rule issued in Criminal Miscellaneous Case No. 6859 of 2017 is discharged. The conviction and sentences of death as awarded to condemned prisoners Sajib Khan, Sakil Miah, and Imran under section 8 of the Nari-o-Shishu Nirjatan Daman Ain, 2000 are commuted to imprisonment for life. The conviction and sentences of death and fine of Taka 1,00,000/- each as awarded to them under section 302 of the Penal Code are also commuted to imprisonment for life. The other order of conviction and sentence of 7 years under section 201 of the Penal Code will remain as before. All the sentences will run concurrently. These convicts should be shifted from the condemned cell to the normal cell at once. C) Criminal Appeal No. 6901 of 2016 and Jail Appeal No. 255 of 2016 are allowed in part. Jail Appeal No. 256 of 2016 is allowed. The conviction and sentence of death and fine of taka 1,00,000/- as awarded to condemned prisoners Samim Osman and Rubel Miah under section 8 of the Nari-o-Shishu Nirjatan Daman Ain, 2000 are set aside. The conviction and sentence of 7 years under section 201 of the Penal Code as awarded to Appellant No. 1 Samim Osman is hereby upheld and confirmed. This convict-appellant be shifted from the condemned cell to the normal cell at once. Appellant No. 2 Rubel Miah is found not guilty of the charge leveled against him and he is acquitted of all the charges. The condemned prisoner Rubel Miah be set at liberty if not wanted in any other case.
22
Raju Ahmed vs- The State and another
The issue as raised by the petitioner is not a res integra. Our apex Court settled the issue in Criminal Petition for Leave to Appeal Nos. 1059-1061 of 2024. In the said case, convicts under section 138 of the NI Act, without depositing 50% of the total amount of the respective cheques, filed applications under section 426(2A) of the Code of Criminal Procedure to be released on bail to enable them to present an appeal. The said applications were rejected. Against the orders, the convicts filed Criminal Revision Nos. 3178, 3180, and 3179 of 2024 and obtained Rule and they were also enlarged on bail. Complainants of the cases preferred Criminal Petition for Leave to Appeal Nos. 1059-1061 of 2024. In the said Criminal Petition for Leave to Appeals our apex Court held that section 426(2A) of the Code of Criminal Procedure is not contradictory with the provision of section 138A of the NI Act, rather the provision of section 426(2A) of the Code of Criminal Procedure will be applicable subject to fulfillment of condition stipulated under section 138A of the NI Act i.e. subject to deposit 50% of the total amount of the cheque. Therefore, we are of the view that the trial court rightly passed the impugned order rejecting the bail application of the petitioner and we do not find any reason to interfere with the same. Hence, the application is rejected summarily.
23
Raju Ahmed -Vs- The State and another
The issue as raised by the petitioner is not a res integra. Our apex Court settled the issue in Criminal Petition for Leave to Appeal Nos. 1059-1061 of 2024. In the said case, convicts under section 138 of the NI Act, without depositing 50% of the total amount of the respective cheques, filed applications under section 426(2A) of the Code of Criminal Procedure to be released on bail to enable them to present an appeal. The said applications were rejected. Against the orders, the convicts filed Criminal Revision Nos. 3178, 3180, and 3179 of 2024 and obtained Rule and they were also enlarged on bail. Complainants of the cases preferred Criminal Petition for Leave to Appeal Nos. 1059-1061 of 2024. In the said Criminal Petition for Leave to Appeals our apex Court held that section 426(2A) of the Code of Criminal Procedure is not contradictory with the provision of section 138A of the NI Act, rather the provision of section 426(2A) of the Code of Criminal Procedure will be applicable subject to fulfillment of condition stipulated under section 138A of the NI Act i.e. subject to deposit 50% of the total amount of the cheque. Therefore, we are of the view that the trial court rightly passed the impugned order rejecting the bail application of the petitioner and we do not find any reason to interfere with the same. Hence, the application is rejected summarily.
24
Debangshu Kumar Sarkar Vs- The state
Disposed of. The office is directed to communicate a copy of the order to the learned Judge, Nari-O-Shishu Nirjatan Daman Tribunal No.1, Rangpur to take necessary steps to transmit the case record of Nari-O-Shishu case being No.37 of 2022 to Nari-O-Shishu Nirjatan Daman Tribunal No.2, Rangpur for expeditious trial and disposal. The office is also directed to communicate a copy of the order to the learned Judge, Nari-O-Shishu Nirjatan Daman Tribunal No. 2, Rangpur to take necessary steps as per the direction given herein above.
25
Md. Nurul Huda Vs- The State and another
Rule Discharged
26
Md. Nurul Huda Vs- The State and another
Rule Discharged
27
Md. Nurul Huda Vs- The state and another
Rule Discharged
28
Abdur Rashid Munshi and another
Discharged
29
Sree Milon Sarker
Discharged
30
M M Ehsan Nizami @ Tanim an another
Discharged
31
Md. Kamal Hossain vs- Government of Bangladesh
Summerly rejected
32
Tareq Hossain vs- The state
Absolute
33
Md. Mosharaf Hossain Chowdhury -vs- The state and another
Discharged
34
Md. Abdul Quddus Makhan -Vs - The state
Discharged
35
Md, Babul Driver - vs - The state
Rule and bail
36
Jahor Miah - The state
Rule bail
37
Shamim - Vs - The state
The Rule is discharged with the above modification in the sentence.
38
Razzak - vs - The state
The Rule is discharged with the above modification in the sentence.
39
Md. Abu Rashid Vs. The State and another
40
Md. Nurul Islam - THe state
The rule is made absolute. The judgment and order dated 28.02.2005 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, 1st Court, Gazipur in Criminal Appeal No. 24 of 1991affirming the judgment and order of conviction and sentence dated 30.05.1991 passed by the learned Magistrate, 1st Class, Kapashia, Gazipur in Criminal Miscellaneous Case No. 03 of 1991 arising out of T.R. No. 25 of 1991 is hereby set aside.
41
Sarbat Ali - The state
The rule is made absolute. The impugned judgment and order dated 13.02.2005 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Manikgonj in Criminal Appeal No. 54 of 2001 dismissing the said appeal and thereby affirming the judgment and order of conviction and sentenced dated 16.08.2001 passed by the learned Additional District Magistrate, Manikgonj in G.R. Case No. 736 of are hereby set aside.
42
Ferdous Miah - The state
disposed of
43
Ferdous Miah - vs - The state
Disposed of
44
Delwar Sheikh.
Disposed of
45
Md. Elias Kanchon.
Disposed of
46
Ferdous Miah Vs. The State
47
Md. Anower Hossain Vs. The State
48
Md. Asor Uddin Vs. The State
49
Md. Elias Kanchon Vs. The State
50
Md. Shakil Hossain - vs - The state
bail