Home : Supreme Court of Bangladesh

151

Civil Revision 785/2012

Sree Sudhir Chandra Sarker and others -Versus- Sree Prodip Chandra Sen and others

152

Civil Revision 138/2012

Md. Quamruzzaman Talukdar-Versus-Md. Motiur Rahman and others

153

Civil Revision 627/2011

Sayeda Nurun Nahar Lucky and others-Versus- Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh represented by the Deputy Commissioner, Brahmanbaria and others

154

Civil Revision 3641/2008

Sayed Md.Nurul Islam Miazi and others-Vs- Tajol Islam and another

155

Civil Revision 3970/2008

Md. Shafiqur Rahman and others-Versus-Ali Akbar and others

156

Civil Revision 2826/2008

Jahir Ahmed-Versus- Nurul Islam and others

157

Civil Revision 837/2005

Md. Mahmudul Haque Bhuiyan- Versus- Jesmin Akther Beauty

158

Civil Revision 4017/2001

Kulsum Bibi- Versus- Abdul Kader Munshi and others

159

Civil Rule 792/2014

Md. Ferdous Alom -Versus- Mosammat Akhinoor Begum

160

Death Reference 116/2017
(/)

The State-Versus- Washim Akter @ Tarek Hossain @ Tarek @ Marfat Ali and others

161

Criminal Revision 263/2011
(Criminal Revision 263/2011)

Begum Anar Kali and another VS The state and another

162

Writ Petition 1683/2014

বাংলাদেশ পরিবেশ আইনবিদ সমিতি (বেলা) বনাম বাংলাদেশ সরকার ও অন্যান্য

163

Criminal Misc 11914/2008
(Criminal Misc 11914/2008)

Syed Galib Ahmed and another VS The State and another

164

In re : Writ Petition 5147/2021
(Rule and Direction)

Md. Akramul Ahsan Kanchan Vs Government of Bangladesh and others

এজাহার/অভিযোগ দায়ের করার ক্ষেত্রে জাতীয় পরিচয় পত্র/পাসপোর্ট নম্বর ব্যবহার সম্পর্কিত নির্দেশনা।

165

Writ Petition 6049/2011

তানজিন বৃষ্টি বনাম বাংলাদেশ সরকার ও অন্যান্য

166

Writ Petition 1046/2021
(Writ Petition 1046/2021)

Md. Ahsan Habib Vs Government of the People`s Republic of Bangladesh

Present: Mr. Justice Md. Nazrul Islam Talukder And Mr. Justice Mohi Uddin Shamim

167

Writ Petition 6653/2012
(Writ Petition 6653/2012)

M. Asafuddowlah Vs. Government of Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Public Administration, Bangladesh Secretariat, Dhaka.

The current trend of making/posting the Civil Servents as Officers on Special Duty (OSD) without assigning any special duty, whatsoever, beyond the scope of Circular No. Sa.Ma/ (Bi:Pro:)-12-90-03(200) dated 03.10.1991 and keeping them as OSD for unlimited period longer than the periods prescribed in the said Circular dated 03.10.1991.

168

Criminal Misc 20352/2009
(Criminal Misc 20352/2009)

Barrister Md. Aminul Hoque Vs The State and another

169

First Appeal 295/2017
(Civil Rule 610(F) of 2017 with Civil Rule 29(Vio)(F) of 2020)

Abdul Mazid Talukder and others Vs. Abdul Kader and others

Evidentiary value of Pantograph prepared by Survey- expert.

170

First Appeal 18/2019
(Civil Rule 611(F) of 2018)

Shirajul Islam Mollah and another Vs. Bangladesh Bank and others

A decision per-incurium is not a binding precedent.
When the Suit itself is barred by law, malafide can not be examined.

171

First Appeal 56/2013
(with Civil Rule no 159 (F) of 2013)

আব্দুল লতিফ বনাম মোহাম্মদ কামাল উদ্দীন এবং অন্যান্য

দালিলিক স্বাক্ষ্য গ্রহণ, চিহ্নিত করন, সাক্ষ্য মূল্য ইত্যাদি।
দেওয়ানী মামলা প্রমানের মানদন্ড।

172

Trademark Appeal 9/2011
(Trademark Appeal 09of2011)

DanishFoodsLtdvsThe registrarDepartment of Patents

173

Writ Petition 824/2021
(/)

মোঃ আতাউর রহমান ওরফে আতাউর রহমান বনাম বাংলাদেশ সরকার গং

সামগ্রিক অবস্থা বিবেচনায় নিয়ে আদালতের সুষ্পষ্ট ও সুনির্দিষ্ট অভিমত এই যে, দুর্নীতি দমন কমিশন সহ বিভিন্ন তদন্ত সংস্থা ও আইন শৃঙ্খলা রক্ষাকারী বাহিনীর উচিত হবে যে, অনুসন্ধান বা তদন্ত পর্যায়ে যে কোন অপরাধের সাথে জড়িত সন্দেহভাজন কোন ব্যক্তিকে দেশ ত্যাগে বারিত করার জন্য অবিলম্বে প্রয়োজনীয় আইন বা বিধি প্রনয়ন করা; এবং যতক্ষন পর্যন্ত এই ধরনের আইন বা বিধি প্রণয়ন করা না হবে ততক্ষন পর্যন্ত অন্তবর্তী ব্যবস্থা হিসেবে এখতিয়ার সম্পন্ন আদালতের নিকট এ ধরনের বারিত আদেশ প্রার্থনা করা এবং আদালতের অনুমতি গ্রহণ করা।

174

Civil Revision 3537/2016
(Civil Revision 3537/2016)

আভ্যন্তরীণ নৌ পরিবহন কর্তৃপক্ষ বনাম মোহাহের হোসেন বিশ্বাস

175

Writ Petition 3141/2019

Spice Television Private Limited vs. The Government of Bangladesh and others

Regarding allocation of frequency in favour of the petitioner’s Television Channel namely Spice Television Limited (Spice TV)

176

Writ Petition 1459/1998

Syed Ahmed Ali Aziz Vs. The Secretary, Ministry of Housing and Public Works, Bangladesh Secretariat, Dhaka and others

Regarding action of the respondents in cancelling the lease.

177

Criminal Appeal(H) 6799/2011
(Criminal Appeal(H) 6799/2011)

Md. Anis Miah vs The State

178

Writ Petition 5035/2020
(W.P. No.5035 of 2020 and W.P. No.6283 of 2020/)

Abdus Salam Vs. Government of Bangladesh and others

The question of bias or prejudice requires to be established and it cannot be inferred. It would have to be decided on the facts of each case. There could not be any general proposition of law to be laid down that in every case where the informant was the investigator, the trial is vitiated and the accused is entitled to acquittal. The matter has to be decided on a case to case basis without any universal generalisation.

179

Writ Petition 13760/2018

savar thana osohai poribar ponurbason bohumukhi somobai somiti limited vs biggo judge orpito sompotti pottarpon appellate tribunal Dhaka and others

180

Criminal Revision 796/2016
(/)

Anti-Corruption Commission -Vs- Md. Abul Kashem and others

We have no other option but to hold that since section 10(4) of the Act of 1958 has authorised the Commission only to withdraw a case, the Government has nothing to do in such matter as the provision of section 494 of the Code shall not be applicable or come into play in respect of the scheduled offences under the Act of 2004 which are triable by the Special Judge constituted under the Act of 1958.

181

Writ Petition 7297/2019
(Writ Petition 7297/2019)

Banu, wife of late Md. Yasin, 13 Huts, Tejgaon Non-Local Relief Camp, 10/A, Post Office Mirpur-1216, Pallabi, Dhaka VS Bangladesh represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs, Bangladesh Secretariat, Secretariat Building, Ramna, Dhaka and others.

On an application under article 102 of the Constitution of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh, this Rule Nisi was issued calling upon the respondents to show cause as to why the detenue, namely, Md. Arman, now being detained in Kashimpur Jail-2 should not be brought before this court so as to it may satisfy itself that, he is not being held in custody/jail without lawful authority or in an unlawful manner and to set him at liberty and to declare the detention/ confinement of the detenue to be without lawful authority and is of no legal effect and why the respondents should not be directed or award appropriate compensation to the detenue for wrongful confinement and/or pass such other or further order or orders as to this court may seem fit and proper.

182

Writ Petition 4611/2020

A.K.M Asiful Haque Vs. Secretary, Law and Justice and Division, Ministry of Law, Justice and Parliamentary Affairs and others

The words “public trial” denote public access to the court proceedings. In other words, public trial reflects “open justice” and any trial that grants access to the court or the venue at which court proceedings would take place will be regarded as “public trial”.

Article 35(3) of the Constitution of the people’s republic of Bangladesh mandates that the criminal proceeding of a court or tribunal shall be held in public. Public means, for the use of everyone without discrimination. Anything, gathering or audience which is not private is public. Obviously, a Judge’s Chamber is not a court hall to which the public will normally have any right of access. Courtrooms are considered as public place as opposed to the Judge’s Chambers for the simple reason that the Judicial Officers, the parties and their Counsels and any interested member of the public has unrestricted ‘access’ to it. With all due respect, if the Judge granted unrestricted access to his chamber to the parties and their Counsels and any interested member of the public, the chamber would move from a ‘private’ place to a ‘public place’. Same conditions when available in a remote hearing i.e access being granted to and available to Judicial Officers, the parties and their Counsels and any interested member of the public will make the venue of such remote/virtual hearing be it zoom, skype, whatsApp etc. a public place in line with the provisions of Article 35(3) of the Constitution. It is our opinion, therefore, that the apprehension whether remote hearings are in conformity with the constitutional requirement that the proceeding be in public, the answer would be that the Constitution did not say that such proceedings must be in a physical structure called a Courtroom. Once the proceeding in a remote/Virtual hearing through video conferencing is made accessible to everyone involved and any interested member of the public, then the condition as provided by Article 35(3) would be complied with.

183

Writ Petition 13256/2018
(with W.P. 14509 of 2018 with W.P. 14510 of 2018 with W.P. 262 of 2019)

A A M Ziaur Rahman Vs. Bangladesh and others

Direction given to conduct trial of all cases under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 only by the Courts of Joint Sessions Judges.

184

Civil Revision 121/2018
(Civil Revision 121/2018)

Javed Iqbal Khan VS Haji Md. Bahauddin

185

Criminal Appeal(H) 833/1993
(Criminal Appeal No. 833 of 1993)

Amzad Hossain alais Nahid VS The State.

186

Civil Rule 690/2018
(Civil Rule 690(F)/2018)

Saleha Khanam and two others versus Shamsul Haque and others

187

Criminal Revision 1651/2017
(/)

Md. Moti Matbor vs The State

Narcotics Control Act,1990. Possession of 411 pieces of yaba tablets weighing 37.65 grams. `purity` test or `whole substance` test. Probation under Section 5 of the Probation of Offenders Ordinance, 1960

188

Writ Petition 14180/2019
(Writ cases)

Sahanaz parvin -Vs- The Government of Bangladesh and others

ভূয়া গ্রেফতারি পরোয়ানা রোধে নির্দেশনা সমূহ।

189

Writ Petition 14538/2012
(/)

Human Rights and Peace for Bangladesh -Vs- Government of Bangladesh and others

এ প্রসঙ্গে উল্লেখ করা আবশ্যক যে, সম্মানিত আইন প্রনেতাগণ আইন, ২০০০ প্রণয়নের ক্ষেত্রে বর্তমান প্রেক্ষাপট এবং ভবিষ্যতের প্রয়োজন অনুধাবন করে এ আইনটি প্রণয়ন করেছেন এবং এই আইনের ২ (চ) ধারায় প্রাকৃতিক জলাধার এর আওতায় মহানগী, বিভাগীয় শহর ও জেলা শহরের পৌর এলাকাসহ দেশের সকল পৌর এলাকার মাষ্টার প্লানে চিহ্নিত নদী, খাল, বিল, দীঘি, ঝর্ণা বা জলাশয় অথবা সরকার, স্থানীয় সরকার বা কোন সংস্থান কর্তৃক, সরকারী গেজেটে প্রজ্ঞাপন দ্বারা বন্যা প্রবাহ এলাকা হিসাবে ঘোষিত প্রাকৃতিক জলাধারের আওতায় আনা হয়েছে। এছাড়া সলল পানি এবঙ বৃষ্টির পানি ধারণ করে এমন কোন ভূমিও উক্ত প্রাকৃতিক জলাধারের আওতাভূক্ত করা হয়েছে। এক্ষেত্রে ব্যক্তি মালিকানাধীন কোন পুকুরকে উক্ত সংজ্ঞা থেকে বাদ দেয়া হয়নি বরং ইহা উক্ত আইনের ২ (চ) ধারায় প্রাকৃতিক জলাধারের সংজ্ঞাভূক্ত করা হয়েছে।

190

Criminal Misc 37799/2017
(Criminal Miscellaneous No. 37799 of 2017)

Rokib @ Rakibur Rahman vs The State

191

Writ Petition 9204/2013
(with 9205)

Marrine Vegetable Oil ltd and Jasmir Vegetable Oil Limited vs Bangladesh Oil Gas

192

Suo-Muto Rule 3/2015

The state vs secretary, Ministry of land, Bangladesh sochibaloy,Dhaka and others

193

Writ Petition 2640/2011

Md.Ibrahim vs the Government of Bangladesh

194

Criminal Appeal(H) 1535/2020
(with Criminal Appeal 1536 of 2020)

Md. Ershad Ali @ Md. Ershad Ullah Vs. The State and another

195

Criminal Appeal(H) 1660/2016

Uthpal Kumar Roy and three others Vs. Meghnad Shaha and another

The tribunal shall not take cognizance or frame charge of an offence punishable under section 11 (Ga) or 11(Ga)/30 of the Ain, 2000 against an accused without having a medical examination certificate from Government Hospital or any private Hospital, recognized by the Government for that purpose in view of the provision under section 32 of the said Ain in support of simple hurt of the victim wife.

196

Writ Petition 7824/2016

মাধবদী বাজার কমিটি ও মার্চেন্ট এ‌্যাসোসিয়েশন ও অন্য বনাম বাংলাদেশ সরকার ও অন্যান্য

197

Writ Petition 9263/2011

Orascom Telecom Bangladesh Limited Vs. Bangladesh Telecommunication Regulatory Commission, Represented by its Chairman, IEB Bhaban, Ramna, Dhaka-1000 and others.

198

Criminal Appeal(H) 10468/2017
(Criminal Appeal 10468/2017)

Mahmudul Hasan Vs The State and another

199

Death Reference 61/2011
(with Criminal Appeal 6592 of 2011 with Jail Appeal 50 of 2012 with Criminal Miscellaneous 50897 of 2013)

The State vs Oli

200

First Misc Appeal 166/2009

Md. Billal Hossain and another vs Md. ShawkatAli and ten others