Judgment : High Court Division Full List
 
Case Type
Case/Tender Number
Year
Parties
Short Description
 

Case Number Parties Short Description
701
Md. Rafique Ahmed -Versus- The State and another
702
Gopal Adhikari vs. Mohammad Fasiul Alam Chowdhury and another
Discharged
703
The State -Vs- Md. Sheikh Farid
704
Md. Fazlul Haque Pramanik being dead his legal heirs 1(Ka) Most. Rofikon Nesa and others .... Petitioners -VersusSaleha Khatun wife of late Kalu Pramanik and others ....Opposite-parties
705
Md. Komruzzaman Sarder Vs. Md. Abul Khayer Sarder and another.
Disposed of
706
Rupali Bank Limited, S.K. Road Branch, Narayanganj represented by its Manager.-Vs-Md. Habibur Rahman, son of A. Rahman of R.K. Das Road, Police Station and District- Narayanganj and others.
Discharged
707
Md. Jahangir Hossain Vs. The State and another
708
Mizanur Rahman Vs. The State and another
709
Nasim Ahmed Vs. The State
Disposed of.
710
Monjur Hossain Khan and others vs. Md. Kamrul Hassan and others
ABSOLUTE
711
Md. Khoyrat Hossain vs the state
712
Mst. Rina Akter being dead his heirs- Tahura Akter and others Vs. Md. Nurul Islam and another
713
Md. Rais Uddin -Vs- Md. Taiz Uddin Ahammed Taz and others
An application under Order 9 rule 13 CPC, which gave rise to Miscellaneous Case No. 106 of 1989, was filed on 16.11.89. From this it is apparent that this application for setting aside the ex parte decree was filed after 49 days from the date of passing the impugned decree. Article 164 of the Limitation Act provides that an application for setting aside an ex parte decree shall have to be filed within 30 days from the date of the decree where summons was duly served and within 30 days from the date of knowledge when summons was not duly served. In our case under review there is no denial of the fact of due service of summons. So, evidently this case is governed by Article 164 of the Limitation Act, which provides that the application for setting aside the ex parte decree is required to be filed within 30 days from the date of decree impugned.
714
S. M. Prince (Babu) -Vs- Md. Tozammel Haque Sarker and others
The plaintiff mentioned the number of the C.S. and S. A. Khatians and also the plot numbers in the suit, and thus, there was full compliance with the provisions of Order VII Rule 3 of the Code. And since no fraction or portion of the lands of the two plots was claimed, there was no necessity of giving any Chauhaddi or boundary of the suit plots. "If the dispute involves complicated questions of title, the plaintiff must establish his title by filing a regular suit for declaration of title. A simple suit for a permanent injunction should not be allowed to be used as a testing device to ascertain the title".
715
Sultan Ahamed Vs. The State
716
Sultan Ahamed Vs. The State
717
Most. Julekha Khatun vs the state and another
718
Falik Uddin Chowdhury being died his legal heirs: petitioner Nos. 1-8. =Versus= Fazlur Rahman Chowdhury and another
An application under section 115(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure
719
Sadequl and others =Versus= Sadir Ahmmod and others
An application under section 115(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure.
720
Md. Mozammel Hoque {died leaving behind his legal heirs: 1(a)-1(g)}. =Versus= Md. Abdul Hamid Mollah {died leaving behind his legal heirs: 1(Ka)-1(Chha)} and others
An application under section 115(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure. (Against Decree)
721
Sreemoti Chapala Bala Das and others =Versus= Mrinal Kanti Shaha {(O.P. No. 2 died leaving behind her legal heirs: 2(a), 2(b)
An application under section 115(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure.
722
Md. Zarzis =Versus= Moulana Md. Idris alias Md. Idris Ali {died leaving behind his legal heirs: 1(a)-1(f)} and subsequently O.P No. 1(e). Most. Zakera Khatun died leaving behind her legal heirs: 1(e)(i)- 1(e)(vi)
An application under section 115(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure.
723
Md. Khabir Uddin and others =Versus= Mowlana Abdul Wahab {died leaving behind his legal heirs: 1(a)-1(v)}and others
An application under section 115(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure.
724
Mohammad Aminul Haque and others =Versus= Md. Jalal Ahmed and another
An application under section 115(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure. (Against Decree)
725
Sree Sunil Kumar Dev ........ Plaintiff-petitioner -Versus- Sreemati Parul Rani Chowdhury being dead her heirs Ashish Kumar Chowdhury alias Chandu and others .... Defendant-opposite parties
726
Md. Solaiman Hossen -Vs- Md. Anwar Hossen and others
The onus of proof entirely lies upon the party, who asserts that the transfer is a sub-kabala in disguise of a deed of exchange under section 101 and 103 of the Evidence Act [ I of 1872] The preemptor`s incumbent duty is to prove by adequate tangible, credible evidence that the deed in question is out and out a sale deed, in disguise of a deed of exchange.
727
Gopendra Kumar Das being dead his heirs Dulan Kumar Talukder and others Vs. Dharoni Das and others
Appeal is allowed remanding the suit to the trial Court.
728
Mowlavi Siddique Ahammad and others Vs. Kabir Ahamad and others
729
Md. Abdul Khalek, being dead, his heirs: Md. Oyaz Kuruny and others -Vs- Md. Monayem Hossain and others
Any land recorded in Khatian as Bagan Bari, Bithi, Bari but situated outside the municipal area should fall within the definition of agricultural land. Mention of a wrong provision or omission to mention the provision containing the source of power will not invalidate an order where such power exists.
730
Monira Begum Promi-Vs-Mohammad Kaium
731
Mrs. Ponia Akter, wife of late Abdur Rahim and another.-Vs-Md. Alamin alias Montu, son of late Ahamad Hossain of village- Dhekia, Police Station- Hossainpur, District- Kishoreganj and others.
Appeal allowed and rule discharged
732
Md. Rafiq Ahmed vs the state
733
Khandaker Soikat vs the state
734
Sinha Power Generation Company Limited, having its registered office at Mohakhali Tower (13th Floor), 82 Mohakhali Commercial Area, Dhaka-1212 represented by its Managing Director, namely, Arifur Rahman Sinha.-Vs-Bangladesh Power Development Board (BPDB) represented by its Chairman having office at Wapda Building, 1st Floor, Motijheel C/A, Dhaka-1000.
Appeal dismissed and rule discharged
735
Mostofa Mohsin vs t he state and another
736
Md. Harunur Rashid Vs. Motiar Rahman and others
737
Md. Ramiz Uddin being dead his legal hiers_ Mosammot Meherun Nessa and others Vs. Sree Somir Ranjan Sarkar and others
738
Md. Ataur Rahman Prodhan Vs. Most Monira Begum and others
739
Sufia Khatun and others Vs. Muksud Ali and others
740
Md. Gour Ali VS. Md. Jahangir Miah and others
741
Alamgir and others Vs. Shalah Uddin and others
Appeal is allowed.
742
Siraj Miah being dead his legal heirs Akbar Hossain and others Vs.Ataur Rahman being dead his heirs Siddika Begum and others
Appeal is disposed of.
743
Mrs. Salma Begum and another Vs. Md. Monowar Hossain Choukidar and others
Appeal is dismissed.
744
Umme Kulsum (Sriti) and others ........ Defendant-petitioners -Versus- A.T.M. Jashimuddin being dead his heirs A.H.M. Kamruzzaman (Apu) and others ....... Plaintiff-opposite parties
745
Umme Kulsum (Sriti) and others ........ Defendant-petitioners -Versus- A.T.M. Jashimuddin being dead his heirs A.H.M. Kamruzzaman (Apu) and others ....... Plaintiff-opposite parties
746
Md. Muzaffar Ali Sarker ...Petitioner -Versus- Most. Sufia Bewa and others …Opposite parties
747
Md. Rahim Uddin Gain ...Pre-emptee-petitioner -Versus- Md. Mozibar Rahman Molla and others …Opposite parties
748
749
Md. Jalal vs the state
750
Md. Rafiq Ahmed vs. the state
This Site is Visited :