দায়বর্জন বিবৃতি (DISCLAIMER)

এই ওয়েবসাইটে প্রকাশিত রায় বা আদেশ আপনি google translation এর মাধ্যমে বাংলায় দেখতে পাচ্ছেন তা সুপ্রীম কোর্ট কর্তৃক বাংলায় অনূদিত নয়। জনসাধারণের বিচার-প্রক্রিয়ায় সহজ অভিগম্যতা নিশ্চিতকরণের অভিপ্রায়ে বাংলায় অনূদিত রায়-আদেশ দেখার ব্যবস্থা রাখা হয়েছে। অনূদিত রায় বা আদেশের অনুলিপি সইমোহরী/জাবেদা নকলের (certified copy) বিকল্প হিসেবে অথবা অন্য কোন উদ্দেশ্যে ব্যবহার করা যাবে না। রায় ও আদেশ বাস্তবায়নের ক্ষেত্রে মামলার নথিতে বিধৃত মূল রায় বা আদেশ প্রণিধানযোগ্য।
Microsoft Word - C.R. No. 1799 of 2021 Joypurhat

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BANGLADESH

  HIGH COURT DIVISION

       (CIVIL REVISIONAL JURISDICTION)

Civil Revision No. 1799 of 2021

In the matter of:

Md. Komruzzaman Sarder @ Mokruzzaman Sarder being dead his legal heirs: (1) Most. Nur Nahar Bibi and others.

...Petitioners.

  Present  -Vs-

         Mr. Justice Mamnoon Rahman  Md. Abul Khayer Sarder and another.

....Opposite parties.

Mr. Md. Humayun Kabir Manju, Adv.

…For the petitioners.

Mr. Md. Zobaidur Rahman, Adv.

…For the opposite party No. 1.

Heard on: 04.08.2024

And

Judgment on: The 16th January, 2025

In  an  application  under  section  115(1)  of  the  Code  of  Civil Procedure, 1908 rule was issued calling upon the opposite parties to show cause as to why the judgment and order dated 26.08.2021 passed by the learned District Judge, Joypurhat in Misc. Appeal No. 02 of 2021 disallowing the appeal and thereby affirming the judgment and order dated 13.01.2021 passed by the learned Senior Assistant Judge, Kalai, Joypurhat in Other Class Suit No. 126 of 2020 disallowed the application for temporary injunction, should not be set aside and/or pass such other or further order or orders as to this court may seem fit and proper.

I have heard the learned Advocates for the petitioner as well as opposite party No. 1. I have perused the revisional application, ground taken  thereon  as  well  as  necessary  papers  and  documents  annexed herewith.

On perusal of the same, it transpires that the suit is pending before  the  trial  court  since  2020  wherein  the  petitioner  filed  an application for temporary injunction. It further transpires that the trial court refused to grant the same resulting which the petitioner moved before the District Judge by way of Miscellaneous Appeal which was also affirmed by the lower appellate court. However, on perusal of the papers and documents as well as order book, it transpires that at the time of issuance of rule this court passed an order of status-quo.

Considering the facts and circumstances, I am of the view that justice would be done if a direction be given upon the trial court to hear and dispose of the suit expeditiously, as possible, within a fixed period. Accordingly, the trial court is directed to hear and dispose of the suit, namely Other Class Suit No. 126 of 2020 strictly on merit by applying its independent and judicial mind within 30th June, 2025 without fail and without giving any adjournment to the parties in any manner.

The trial court is further directed to inform this court about the disposal of the suit as directed, in writing, through the Registrar of the High Court Division within 7(seven) days from the date of disposal of the suit.

Since the order of status-quo is continuing from 2021, I am of the view that the same be continued for the period as directed by this court regarding disposal of the suit.

With this observation and direction, the instant rule is disposed

of.

Send down the L.C. Records to the concerned court below with a copy of the judgment, at once.

(Mamnoon Rahman,J:)