দায়বর্জন বিবৃতি (DISCLAIMER)

এই ওয়েবসাইটে প্রকাশিত রায় বা আদেশ আপনি google translation এর মাধ্যমে বাংলায় দেখতে পাচ্ছেন তা সুপ্রীম কোর্ট কর্তৃক বাংলায় অনূদিত নয়। জনসাধারণের বিচার-প্রক্রিয়ায় সহজ অভিগম্যতা নিশ্চিতকরণের অভিপ্রায়ে বাংলায় অনূদিত রায়-আদেশ দেখার ব্যবস্থা রাখা হয়েছে। অনূদিত রায় বা আদেশের অনুলিপি সইমোহরী/জাবেদা নকলের (certified copy) বিকল্প হিসেবে অথবা অন্য কোন উদ্দেশ্যে ব্যবহার করা যাবে না। রায় ও আদেশ বাস্তবায়নের ক্ষেত্রে মামলার নথিতে বিধৃত মূল রায় বা আদেশ প্রণিধানযোগ্য।
Microsoft Word - C.R. No. 2085 of 2010 discharged

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BANGLADESH

HIGH COURT DIVISION

(CIVIL REVISIONAL JURISDICTION)

Present:

Mr. Justice Zafar Ahmed

Civil Revision No. 2085 of 2010 In the matter of:

Gopal Adhikari

Defendant-appellant-petitioner

-Versus-

Mohammad Fasiul Alam Chowdhury and another

Plaintiff-respondent-opposite parties

None

...For the petitioner

Mr. A.S.M. Rahmatullah, Advocate

... For the opposite party No. 1

Heard on: 25.11.2024 and 12.12.2024 Judgment on: 15.12.2024

Other  Appeal  No.  67  of  2010  was  dismissed  summarily  as being barred by limitation of 963 days by the learned District Judge, Chattogram, vide judgment and order dated 04.03.2010. Challenging the  said  judgment,  the  defendant-appellant  has  filed  the  instant revision and obtained Rule on 23.05.2010.


1

The plaintiff-opposite party No. 1 has filed a counter-affidavit. None appeared for the petitioner when the Rule was taken up for hearing.

It  appears  from  the  materials  on  record  that  the  present petitioner as defendant filed Other Suit No. 01 of 2001 in the Court of 3rd Assistant Judge, Chattogram in which, the present opposite party was the defendant No. 1.

The present opposite parties as plaintiff filed Other Suit No. 02 of 2001 impleading the present petitioner as sole defendant. Both the suits were tried analogously. The trial Court decreed Other Suit No. 02  of  2001  on  31.05.2007.  The  Other  Suit  No.  01  of  2001  was dismissed.

Challenging the decree passed in Other Suit No. 02 of 2001 in which the present petitioner was defendant, he filed Other Appeal No. 67 of 2010 which is the subject matter of the instant Rule. There was a delay of 963 days in filing the appeal. The application for condonation of delay filed by the defendant-appellant was rejected summarily and the appeal was dismissed by the appellate Court on 04.03.2010.

It  appears  from  the  counter-affidavit  that  challenging  the judgment and decree of dismissal passed in Other Suit No. 01 of 2001 in which, the present petitioner was plaintiff, he filed Title Appeal No. 66 of 2010 with an application for condonation of delay of 963 days. The appellate Court rejected the said application for condonation of delay  and  dismissed  the  appeal  summarily  on  04.03.2010.  The petitioner preferred Civil Revision No. 2083 of 2010. The Rule issued in the said civil revision was discharged on merit on 25.05.2023.

It further appears from the counter-affidavit that the present petitioner was aware of the judgment and decree passed in Other Suit No. 02 of 2001. The appellate Court below by giving cogent reasons rejected the application for condonation of delay and dismissed the appeal summarily. Therefore, I find no merit in the Rule.

In the result, the Rule is discharged.

Arif, ABO