Case Number Parties Short Description
1
Keshob Lal Dutta -vs- 1. Sumonta Patikor being dead his legal heirs- 1(a). Sanjib Chandra Dutta and others
2
3
Jeans 2000 Limited and another ........... Plaintiffs-appellants -Versus- Scholastica Private Limited and others ...... Defendants-respondents
4
Mustak Ahmed and others -vs- Mosammat Juhora Hoque and others
5
Kazi Firoz Rashid vs Syed Mahmoud Ali and another
6
Kazi Firoz Rashid -vs- 3. The Secretary, Ministry of Housing and Public Works, Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh, Secretariat, Ramna, Dhaka and others
7
Golder Jahatap Uddin and another ...........Defendants-appellants -Versus- Md. Abdul Bari and another ......plaintiffs-respondents
8
Md. Sirajul Karim and others -vs- Bangladesh Industrial Finance Company Limited
9
Md. Nasir Uddin ....Defendant No.1-appellant -Versus- 1. Tohidul Islam .......Plaintiff-respondent
10
Shafiquddin Ahmed -vs- General Certificate Officer, Moulvibazar and others
11
Mrs. Ambia Begum and others -vs- Md. Saifullah Miazi
12
Sohrab Ali and others -vs- Md. Abdul Quddus being dead his legal heirs-1(ka) Mst. Shahar Banu Begum and others
13
Md. Joynal Abedin and others -vs- Md. Abbas Ali and others
14
Md. Aroz Ali being dead his legal heirs-1. Mst. Sofura and others -vs- Md. Abdus Sobhan and 11 others
15
Sayeda Khairer Nessa and others -vs- Abeda Khatun and others
16
Amjad Hossain and others -vs- Md. Afajuddin and others
17
Md. Jahangir Hossain Mollah Vs. Md. Samsur Rahman (Bachhu)
18
Md. Jahangir Hossain Mollah Vs. Md. Samsur Rahman (Bachhu)
19
Md. Nazrul Khalifa and others Vs. Md. Mosarraf Hossain Khalifa and others
20
A.N.M Riad Uddin -vs- Advocate Ferdous Khanom Mukta
21
Sree Nirmal Kumar Pall and others -vs- Mst. Rabeya Khatun and others
22
Phoenix Finance and Investment Limited is represented by its Managing Director S.M. Intekhab Alam -vs- Mercantile Bank Limited and others
23
Chail Miah -vs- Kaysar Ali and others
24
Md. Mohar Ali -vs- Md. Nuruzzaman Khan and another
25
Dilip Chandra Ghosh and others -vs- Ershad Miah
26
Md. Azmal Hossain Helal -vs- Assistant Custodian, Vested and Non-Resident property, represented by the Additional Deputy Commissioner (Revenue), Laxmipur
27
The Engineering Works represented by Mirazul Islam and another -vs- Md. Shafiqur Rahman
28
Abdul Kader Sheikh and others -vs- Sabita Dhali
29
Md. Abdus Sattar -vs- Md. Arshad Ali Gazi and others
30
Shajahan Talukder being dead his legal heir-1(a) Md. Kibria Talukder and others -vs- Helena Parvin and others
31
Md. Abdus Sobhan being dead his legal heirs-1(a) Abdur Rashid Mondol and others
32
Md. Zaher Ali Pramanik and others -vs- Mst. Manwara Begum
33
Md. Siddik Mollah and others -vs- The government of Bangladesh and others
34
Md. Siddik Mollah and others -vs- The Government of Bangladesh and others
35
Md. Mojibor Rahman Shonar and others -vs- Md. Robiul Islam and others
36
Md. Afsar Ali, Headmaster (In-Charge), Mirgarh Mainuddin High School, Police Station-Panchagarh, District-Panchagarh replaced and appointed by resolution dated 04.08.2021 -vs- Md. Mahfuzar Rahman
37
Aminur Nesa and others -vs- Hara Kishor Mondal and others
38
Most. Khatemunnesa -vs- Mrs. Samela Khatun and others
39
A. Rahman Master and others -vs- 1. Mohammad Hamijuddin being dead his legal heirs- 1(a). Md. Akbar Ali and others
40
Md. Hasan Ali (Sumon) -vs- Most. Jesmin Akter and another
41
Md. Sharif Mondol -vs- Most. Shirina Khatun
42
Sita Nath Basak and others -vs- Promila Rani Basak being dead her heirs: Paltu Basak @ Paltu Bosak and others
43
Md. Ramal Hossain Dhalu -vs- Md. Rokun Zaman and others
44
Ranjit Bikash Chowdhury -vs- Babul Kanti Majumder and another
45
Ranjit Bikash Chowdhury -vs- Salil Majumder and another
46
Al Amin Mamunur Rashid -vs- Sifta Binte Mamun @ Mifta Binte Mamun (Minor) and another
47
Md. Khorshed Alam -vs- Jannatul Kawsar Jothsana
48
Md. Abdur Razzaq Shah and another -Vs- Md. Golam Sarwar and others
49
Md. Ibrahim Vs. The State
The Registrar General of Bangladesh Supreme Court is hereby directed to issue a “General Circular” to all the Judges/ Magistrates having exercising criminal jurisdiction containing the following directions:
1. The Court below shall not cancel the bail of an accused granted by the High Court Division without any allegation of proven misuse of the privilege of bail by the accused.
2. When an accused is enjoying the privilege of ad-interim bail granted by the High Court Division for a limited period in a pending rule under section 498 of the Cr.P.C or in an appeal against under special law and he/she is regularly appearing before the Court below, his/her bail shall not be cancelled and cannot be taken him/her into jail custody by the Court below only on the ground that he/she could not submit bail extension order from the High Court Division.
3. In the event of unavailability of such extension order, the Courts below must wait for the result of the rule or the appeal, as the case may be, in which the accused was granted ad-interim bail.
4. Learned Judges of the Courts below shall not cancel bail of an accused granted by the High Court Division in pending rule or appeal until and unless the rule is discharged or the appeal is dismissed or in any way the accused violates any condition of bail, if any, imposed by the High Court Division at the time of granting bail”
50
শেখ আবু সেলিম বনাম বাংলাদেশ হাউজ বিল্ডিং ফাইন্যান্স কর্পোরেশন গং