|
Case Number
|
Parties |
Short Description |
|
1 |
Writ Petition 4008/2019
(Writ Petition 4008/2019)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 16-JUN-26
|
Mohammad Ullah Mintu and another-vs-Commissioner of Customs, Customs House, Chattogram and others |
Absolute |
|
2 |
Writ Petition 4007/2019
(Writ Petition 4007/2019)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 16-JUN-26
|
Mohammad Ullah Mintu and another-vs-Commissioner of Customs, Customs House, Chattogram and others |
Absolute |
|
3 |
Writ Petition 4006/2019
(Writ Petition 4006/2019)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 16-JUN-26
|
Mohammad Ullah Mintu and another-vs-Commissioner of Customs, Customs House, Chattogram and others |
Absolute |
|
4 |
Criminal Revision 4812/2024
(Criminal Revision 4812/2024)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 16-JUN-26
|
Md. Rakib Hossain Pias vs. The State and another |
Compromise in Section 138 matters. |
|
5 |
Criminal Revision 2622/2023
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 16-JUN-26
|
Babul Mia and another -Vs- The State and another |
The alleged omission of impleading the company in the proceeding is an irregularity and the same is not fatal and that though the company is not made a party in the proceeding, but the persons concerned, representing the company, who are party in the issuance of the dishonored cheque in reference, having been made party in the proceeding, the proceeding cannot be said to be bad for defect of party inasmuch as the punishment if any on proof, is to be inflicted upon the natural persons involved in the offence committed. |
|
6 |
Writ Petition 5583/2023
(Writ Petition 5583/2023)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 16-JUN-26
|
Sonali Dredger Limited-vs-National Board of Revenue, Represented by its Chairman, NBR Bhaban, Rajaswa Bhaban, Plot No. F1/A, Agargaon, Sher-E-Bangla Nagar, Dhaka-1207 and others |
Absolute |
|
7 |
Writ Petition 10279/2025
(Writ Petition 10279/2025)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 16-JUN-26
|
Commissioner of Customs, Customs House, Chattogram-vs-Customs, Excise and VAT Appellate Tribunal and another |
Discharged |
|
8 |
Customs Appeal 39/2010
(Customs Appeal 39/2010)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 16-JUN-26
|
BSI Inspectorate Limited-vs-Customs, Excise and VAT Appellate Tribunal and others |
Allowed |
|
9 |
Writ Petition 5321/2016
(Writ Petition 5321/2016)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 16-JUN-26
|
Petromax Refinery Limited-vs-National Board of Revenue, represented by its Chairman and others |
Rule Absolute |
|
10 |
VAT Appeal 42/2010
(VAT Appeal 42/2010)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 16-JUN-26
|
Md. Amir Hossain-vs-Customs, Excise and VAT Appellate Tribunal and others |
Rule Allowed |
|
11 |
Customs Appeal 125/2020
(Customs Appeal 125/2020)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 16-JUN-26
|
Hakkani Motors Ltd.-vs-Customs, Excise and VAT Appellate Tribunal and others |
Dismissed |
|
12 |
Writ Petition 13514/2016
(Writ Petition 13514/2016)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 16-JUN-26
|
Nur Afzal Begum-vs-National Board of Revenue and others |
Discharged |
|
13 |
Writ Petition 3188/2026
(Writ Petition 3188/2026)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 16-JUN-26
|
Golden Son Limited-vs-National Board of Revenue and others |
Disposed of |
|
14 |
Writ Petition 15946/2023
(Writ Petition 15946/2023)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 16-JUN-26
|
Rainbow Ice Represented by it’s proprietor, Zamir Uddin Ahmed Chaudhury Rony-vs-The Commissioner of Customs, Customs House, Chattogram and others |
Disposed of |
|
15 |
Criminal Revision 1126/2007
(Criminal Revision 1126/2007)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 16-JUN-26
|
Abdul Khaleque -vs- The state |
Disposed of with modification |
|
16 |
VAT Appeal 37/2011
(VAT Appeal 37/2011)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 15-JUN-26
|
Unilever Bangladesh Limited-vs-Customs, Excise and VAT Appellate Tribunal, Dhaka and others |
Rule allowed |
|
17 |
VAT Appeal 65/2015
(VAT Appeal 65 of 2015 with 66 of 2015 and 67 of 2015)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 15-JUN-26
|
Shurwid Industries Ltd-vs-Customs, Excise and VAT Appellate Tribunal and others |
Dismissed |
|
18 |
Writ Petition 16417/2024
(Writ Petition 16417/2024)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 15-JUN-26
|
M/S Zeil Wears Limited-vs-Chairman, National Board of Revenue and others |
Discharged |
|
19 |
First Misc Appeal 75/2026
(.../)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 15-JUN-26
|
Md. Harisur Rahman (Masum) Vs. Fahima Rahman and another |
It is a settled principle that Order XL of the Code of Civil Procedure confers wide discretionary power upon the Court to appoint a Receiver where it appears just, proper, and convenient and in a partition suit, where a co-sharer entitled to a substantial share is kept out of possession and deprived of benefits, appointment of a Receiver is justified even without proof of waste. |
|
20 |
Writ Petition 3545/2026
(Writ Petition 3545/2026)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 15-JUN-26
|
Md. Shahidul Islam-vs-Government of Bangladesh represented by the Secretary Ministry of Finance, Secretariat Building Ramna, Dhaka and others |
Rule Disposed of |
|
21 |
Writ Petition 3000/2012
(Writ Petition 3000/2012)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 15-JUN-26
|
Joarder Nowsher Ali-vs-Commissioner of Customs, Customs House P.S.-Bandar, District- Chattogram and others |
Discharged |
|
22 |
Writ Petition 8951/2025
(writ petition 8951/2025)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 15-JUN-26
|
Amirul Islam, Proprietor of Mithu Carpets-vs-The Commissioner of Customs, Customs House (ICD), Kamalapur, Dhaka and others |
Rule Disposed of |
|
23 |
Writ Petition 4583/2024
(4583/2024)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 15-JUN-26
|
Amirul Islam, Proprietor of Mithu Carpets-vs-The Commissioner of Customs, Customs House (ICD), Kamalapur, Dhaka and others |
Rule Disposed of |
|
24 |
Customs Appeal 248/2014
(248/2014)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 15-JUN-26
|
M/s. M.R. Trading Corporation, Chattogram-vs-Commissioner of Customs, Customs House, Chattogram and others |
Dismissed |
|
25 |
First Misc Appeal 45/1999
(First Misc Appeal 45/1999)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 15-JUN-26
|
Sirajul Haque Chowdhury Vs. Government of Bangladesh |
Disposed of |
|
26 |
First Misc Appeal 21/2002
(First Misc Appeal 21/2002)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 15-JUN-26
|
Pubali Bank Limited Vs. National Bank Limited and others |
Dismissed |
|
27 |
First Misc Appeal 245/1998
(First Misc Appeal 245/1998)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 15-JUN-26
|
Ahmed Shakil Choudhury and another Vs. Nosir Ahmed being dead his heirs-Hamida Khatun and others |
Dismissed |
|
28 |
First Misc Appeal 94/2011
(First Misc Appeal 94/2011)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 15-JUN-26
|
Haji Mahabubul Hoq and others Vs. Arfa Khatun and others |
Dismissed |
|
29 |
First Misc Appeal 194/1996
(First Misc Appeal 194/1996)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 15-JUN-26
|
Serajul Haque Vs. Anowar Hossain and others |
Dismissed |
|
30 |
Criminal Revision 409/2007
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 15-JUN-26
|
Masuk Miah -Vs- The State and another |
the demand for simply money by the husband from his wife does not constitute any offense under the provisions so enumerated in section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The amount allegedly demanded does not satisfy the definition of dowry as under the Act. the allegation of simple torture does not constitute any offense punishable under section 323 of the Penal Code. |
|
31 |
Criminal Revision 3010/2022
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 15-JUN-26
|
Md. Sajib Miah -Vs- The State and another |
“The High Court, while hearing revision, does not work as an appellate court and will not re-appreciate the evidence, unless some glaring mistake is pointed out to show that injustice has been done”. “Revisional jurisdiction is normally to be exercised only in exceptional cases where there is a glaring defect in the procedure, or there is a manifest error on a point of law resulting in miscarriage of justice”. “While exercising the revisional power, the High Court has no authority to re-appreciate the evidence in the manner as the trial court and appellate courts are required to do”. |
|
32 |
Civil Revision 1623/2012
(Civil Revision 1623/2012)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 14-JUN-26
|
Mohammad Mohsin being dead his heirs Asma Begum and others ... Plaintiff-Petitioners Versus Rezaul Karim and others ... Defendant-Opposite parties |
Discharged |
|
33 |
First Misc Appeal 244/2000
(First Misc Appeal 244/2000)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 14-JUN-26
|
Hilly Housing Co-operative Society Ltd ... Defendant-Appellant -Versus- Akhtaruzzaman Chowdhury and another ... Plaintiff-Respondents |
Disposed of |
|
34 |
Civil Rule 602/2024
(Civil Rule 602/2024)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 14-JUN-26
|
Md. Sadequl Islam ... Defendant-Petitioner Versus Md. Tariqul Islam and others ... Plaintiff-Opposite parties |
Absolute |
|
35 |
Criminal Revision 1291/2007
(Criminal Revision 1291/2007)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 14-JUN-26
|
Joynal Sk. and another -vs- The State, represented by the Deputy Commissioner, Faridpur |
Discharged |
|
36 |
Criminal Revision 130/2007
(Criminal Revision 130/2007)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 14-JUN-26
|
Lokman Hossain Sheikh -vs- The State |
Discharged |
|
37 |
Criminal Revision 1263/2007
(Criminal Revision 1263/2007)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 14-JUN-26
|
Md. Salauddin Sardar -vs- The State and another |
Made absolute |
|
38 |
Writ Petition 9720/2020
(Writ Petition 9720/2020)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 14-JUN-26
|
Md. Shirajul Hoque, Head Master (acting) of Mahigonj High School, son of late Yousuf Ali Miah, Village-Bagdokra, Police Station-Domar, District-Nilphamari versus Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Education, Bangladesh Secretariat, Dhaka-1000, and others |
Absolute in part |
|
39 |
Writ Petition 12525/2021
(Writ Petition 12525/2021)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 11-JUN-26
|
Md. Zahedul Hoque (Mithun)-Vs-Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs and others |
Discharged with modified direction |
|
40 |
Writ Petition 7516/2023
(Writ Petition 7516/2023)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 11-JUN-26
|
Md. Rubel Ahammed-Vs-Government of Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Primary and Mass Education and others |
Absolute with direction |
|
41 |
First Misc Appeal 289/2024
(.../)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 11-JUN-26
|
Most. Afroza Khatun vs. Most. Jahanara Begum and others |
According to sub-rule (1) of rule 22 of Order XXI of the Code, if an application for execution of a decree is made more than two years after the date of the decree, issuance of notice against the judgment-debtor is mandatory but according to sub-rule (3) of rule 22, no order of execution of decree shall be invalid by reason of omission to issue a notice under sub-rule (1). So, the provision of sub-rule (1) of rule 22 became redundant after incorporation of sub-rule (3) in Order XXI of the Code which follows that even if an application for execution is made more than two years after the date of the decree, the order of execution of the decree shall not be invalid by reason of the omission to issue a notice against the judgment-debtor.
The provisions of the Transfer of the Property Act, as discussed above, as well as the law declared by the Hon’ble Appellate Division in Sayed Jubayer Hossain, 28 BLC(AD) 50 (supra), clearly suggest that if an immovable property is mortgaged against security of loan empowering the mortgagee to sell the mortgaged-property in the event of his failing to repay the loan according to his contract, the mortgagee shall have the right to sell the property and if after mortgaging the property, the mortgagor transfers the same to others without the consent of mortgagee without the view of repaying the loan is nothing, but a fraudulent act and by dint of such transfer, the subsequent transferee will not acquire any right, title or interest in the mortgaged-property. |
|
42 |
Civil Revision 1571/2025
(.../)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 11-JUN-26
|
Muhammad Yusuf Choudhury and others vs. Musammat Dilruba and others. |
A third party may be added as a defendant in a suit for specific performance of contract where he can prima facie establish an interest in the suit property as a co-sharer or where there exists some legal impediment affecting enforceability of the contract. |
|
43 |
First Appeal 78/2020
(.../)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 11-JUN-26
|
Government of Bangladesh and others Vs. Munshi Basir Uddin Ahammad and another |
It is a settled principle of law that after the acquisition of rent-receiving interests, there remains only one class of tenants, namely raiyats under the Government, in respect of which S.A. Khatians are prepared and finally recorded in accordance with the provisions of the State Acquisition and Tenancy Act, 1950. It is also a settled principle of law that once the Government has accepted rent from a raiyat in respect of a tenancy, it is estopped from challenging the title of such raiyat, and the raiyat acquires a valid title in the said tenancy. |
|
44 |
First Appeal 261/1999
(.../)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 11-JUN-26
|
Azahar Sharif and another Vs. Abdul Bareque and others |
Endorsement of the registering officer in the deed as ‘‘Registered’’ under section 60 of the Registration Act, 1908 would be a strong presumptive evidence of the fact that the document was explained to the executant(s) before registration who admitted his execution and the receipt of consideration and that the whole proceeding and endorsement made therein were regular and in order and the said endorsement could only be rebutted by the adverse party by adducing strong evidence proving the allegation that fraud was committed upon the Sub-registrar. |
|
45 |
Criminal Appeal(H) 6828/2025
(Criminal Appeal(H) 6828/2025)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 11-JUN-26
|
Joarder Elias Rahman ...Convict-Appellant -Versus- The State and another ...Respondent |
The appeal is allowed |
|
46 |
Civil Revision 2444/2024
(.../)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 11-JUN-26
|
Majeda Begum vs. Zipsam Developers Limited and others |
A plain reading of sub-sections (1)-(4) of section 36 of the Real Estate Development and Management Act, 2010 as a whole suggests that those provisions stipulate alternative dispute resolution mechanism amicably or through appointing joint Arbitral Tribunal as per provision of Arbitration Act, 2001 at the instance of the developer, purchaser or the land owner at any stage of implementation of a real estate project in respect of offences provided under sections 21-25 and 27-30 of the Act, 2010 or violation of any terms of the contract between them and the decision of the Arbitral Tribunal would be binding upon them and the Arbitral Award cannot be questioned before any Court of law. The provision under sub-section (5) of section 36 of the Act, 2010 is very significant which clearly provides a forum to the parties to file case in an appropriate Court constituted under the Act, 2010 for their redress if they fail to constitute Arbitral Tribunal under section 36(3) of the Act, 2010 amicably. Except the offences arose out of the disputes between the parties as described in sections 21-25 and 27-30 of the Real Estate Development and Management Act, other disputes in regards implementation of the real estate project are not covered by section 36 of the Arbitration Act and in that case the parties concerned may resort to arbitration proceeding under section 12 of the Arbitration Act, 2001 to resolve the dispute or in the absence of any arbitration clause, in other appropriate court of law. |
|
47 |
Criminal Revision (TN) 3388/2022
(Criminal Revision)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 11-JUN-26
|
Md. Abdus Sobhan -Versus- The State and another |
Discharged |
|
48 |
Writ Petition 2271/2024
(Writ Petition 2271/2024)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 10-JUN-26
|
Eastern Tower Flat Owners’ Co-operative Society Limited, represented by its Secretary-Vs-Dhaka Power Distribution Company Limited (DPDC), represented by its Managing Director, and others |
Disposed of with direction |
|
49 |
Criminal Revision (TN) 225/2011
(Criminal Revision)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 10-JUN-26
|
Anup Kumar Guha Biswas -Versus- The State and another |
Absolute |
|
50 |
Criminal Appeal(H) (TN) 4107/2023
(Criminal Appeal)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 10-JUN-26
|
A.K.M. Nazmul Hossian -Versus- The State and another |
Dismissed |
