: High Court Division Full List
 
Case Type
Case/Tender Number
Year
Parties
Short Description
 

Case Number Parties Short Description
1
Most. Anar Haque Choudhury and others Vs. Most. Ruli Begum and another
The cardinal principle embodied in Section 28 of the Registration Act, 1908, as well as the law settled by our Apex Court in Syed Kausar Ali v. Gahar Kazi and others, 37 DLR (AD) 177, is that every document affecting immovable property must be registered in the office of the Sub-Registrar having territorial jurisdiction over the property. Where registration is procured by the inclusion of a non-existent, fictitious, or insignificant parcel of land solely for the purpose of creating territorial jurisdiction, such registration cannot prejudice the rights of a person who was not a party to the document and who acquired rights in the property without notice of the transaction. Such conduct constitutes a fraud upon the Registration Act, and any registration obtained by such means is void and of no legal effect.
2
Milan Kumar Mredha and others-vs-The Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Primary and Mass Education and others
Disposed of
3
Linde Bangladesh Limited Vs. The Registrar of Joint Stock Companies and Firms and others.
Application rejected.
4
Sachindra Nath Majumder and others ... Defendant-Petitioners -Versus- Asutosh Majumder @ Kundu ...Plaintiff-Opposite party
absolute
5
Al-Aksa Islami Multipurpose Co-operative Society Limited and others -Versus- Md. Mohiuddin Mollah and others
.
6
Zeeba Ahmed Khan Alias Zeeba Amina Khan. -Versus- Newton One Capita Ltd., and others
Application rejected.
7
MM Structural and Holding Ltd and others. - Versus - International Leasing and Finance Services Limited and others
Application Allowed.
8
A.T.M. Ashraful Islam Helal … Petitioner -VersusGovernment of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh and others … Respondents
Discharged
9
Mohammad Yousuf -versus- The State and another
Disposed of
10
Kochan Management Inc. (KMI) -Versus- AIIM Ventures Limited (AVL) and others
Allowed in part (Modification).
11
The State ..... petitioner -Versus- Md. Moshiur Rahman ..... condemned-prisoner
Therefore, this reference is rejected. The appeal is allowed. The judgment and order of conviction and sentence passed by the learned Judge of the Tribunal convicting the condemned-prisoner under section 11(Ka) of the Ain, 2000 sentencing him thereunder to death with fine is hereby set aside. The condemned-prisoner is acquitted of the charge levelled against him. The concerned authority is directed to release the condemned-prisoner Md. Moshiur Rahman Sukhan, son of late Hafizur Rahman, House 20, 5th Floor, Road 04, Sector-13, Police Station-Uttara Paschim, District-Dhaka from jail forthwith, if not wanted in any other cases.
12
The State .....petitioner -Versus- Md. Azad Mandal alias Azad Saheb .....condemned-prisoner
In the result, the death reference is rejected. The criminal appeal is dismissed. The judgment and order of conviction passed by the Tribunal under section 11(Ka) of the Nari-o-Shishu Nirjatan Ain, 2000 is hereby converted to one under section 302 of the Penal Code and his sentence of death is commuted to imprisonment for life with a fine of Taka 10,000/-, failing to pay the fine he shall suffer imprisonment for 3(three) months more. The jail appeal is accordingly disposed of.
13
Md. Maruf Hossain and others vsBangladesh Public Service Commission, represented by its Chairman, and others
Disposed of
14
Md. Yousuf ... Appellant -Versus- The State, represented by the Deputy Commissioner, Noakhali and another ... Respondents
The appeal is dismissed
15
Mr. Rofiqul Islam Sohel, Advocate Vs. Mr. Abdul Halim Biswas Advocate with Mr. Mohammad Ataul Gani Advocate,
By now, the question is no longer res integra. Order XL of the Code of Civil Procedure confers a wide discretionary power upon the Court to appoint a Receiver whenever it appears to be just, proper, and convenient to do so. In a partition suit, where a co-sharer having a substantial share in the joint property is kept out of possession and deprived of the benefits and income arising therefrom, the appointment of a Receiver is justified even in the absence of proof of waste, mismanagement, or deterioration of the property. Moreover, under Rule 1 of Order XL of the Code of Civil Procedure, the appellate Court has the jurisdiction to appoint a Receiver in an appropriate case during the pendency of an appeal.
16
Fatema Begum and others ... Defendant-Petitioners -Versus- Government of Bangladesh and others ...Plaintiff-Opposite parties
Discharged
17
Md. Gias Uddin ... Appellant -Versus- The State and another ... Respondents
The appeal is allowed
18
Adhir Rahman Chowdhury and others -Versus- Parimol Kanti Chowdhury being dead his heirs and successors- Ashutush Chowdhury and others
.
19
Muiz Khan (Ronnie) alias Ronnie Abdul Muiez. -VERSUS- The Registrar, Joint Stock Companies and Firms (RJSC) and others.
Dismissed.
20
Sheikh Kafiluddin and another vs. Rahaman Dewan and others
Discharged
21
Md. Shafiqul Islam vs. Shirin Islam and others
Disposed of
22
Md. Abdul Shonar being dead his legal heirs: 1(a) Most. Jubeda Bibi and others vs. Shamsuddin Chowdhury being dead his legal heirs: 1(a) Johura Bewa and others
Discharged
23
Golam Maizbhanderi and others vs. Syed Montu and others
Discharged
24
Md. Abu Hanif and others-Vs-Government of Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Education and others
Absolute
25
Mosammat Achia Khatun and others vs. Md. Raisuddin Ahmed and others
Discharged
26
Md. Akbar Ali and another ... Convict-Petitioners -Versus- The State ... Opposite Party
The Rule is discharged
27
Mosammat Rajia Begum -Vs- Fatema Begum and others
A registered document takes effect from the date of execution, but, as regards a third party, the effective date is the date of registration.
A sale executed prior in point of time would prevail.
In a suit for specific performance of contract the onus lies heavily on the person whose title arises subsequent to the contract to sell and he must prove that he is a transferee for value and has paid the money in good faith and without notice of the original contract”
28
Md. Soaif Uddin -Vs- The State and another
Absolute
29
Md. Apel Mahmud ...Convict-Appellant -Versus- The State ...Respondent
The appeal is allowed
30
Soyeb Rahman alias Jimmy ... Appellant -Versus- The State and another ... Respondents
The appeal is dismissed
31
Abdul Kabir -Versus- Abdus Sattar and another
Disposed of
32
Most. Amina Begum -Versus- Md Lutfor Rahman Lota and others
Discharged
33
Titas Gas Transmission and Distribution PLC vs Government of Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Labour and Employment, Bangladesh Secretariat, Ramna Dhaka and others
The respondent No. 4 was employed as an Inspector (Assistant Accountant) under the petitioner company. During the course of his service, allegation surfaced that he had misappropriated company funds by creating and posting forged gas bill payment receipts in the company`s computerized billing system in respect of several consumers, thereby causing substantial financial loss to the petitioner company.
34
Sarowar Alamgir Versus Election Commission Bangladesh, represented by the Chief Election Commissioner, Nirbachon Bhaban, Agargon, Agargon, Dhaka 1207 and others
13th National Parliament Election scheduled to be held on 12.02.2026 as BNP nominated candidate from the Constituency No. 279, Chattogram-2 .
35
Metrocem Cement Limited Vs. M.V. HAJI KAYES, M-7691 and others.
Application for return of the plaint is allowed.
36
Abdul Kalam -versus- The State and another
Dismissed
37
Mst. Shahanara Bewsa and others -Versus- Upazila Nirbahi Karmokarta, Bagmara, Rajshahi and another
Discharged
38
Md. A.Jabbar being died leaving behind his heirs 1(a) Most. Jabeda Begum and others Defendant-respondents-petitioners Versus Md. A. Gafur and others Plaintiff-appellants-opposite parties
Dismissing the suit
39
Md. Mahmudul Karim … Petitioners -Versus- The Government of Bangladesh and others … Respondents
Discharged
40
Sheikh Shamsur Rahman and another -Versus- Sheikh Zia and others
.
41
Haji Md. Din Islam -Versus- Moynakali and others
.
42
Md. Babul Mondol alias Babul Hossain and others Vs. Md. Mozammel Haq and others
Dismissed
43
Bangladesh General Insurance Co. Ltd Vs. Bangladesh Biman Corporation and others
Dismissed
44
Md. Abdur Rafiqu Sarkar Vs. Jiban Bima Corporation
Dismissed
45
M.A. Awal Siddique and others Vs. Manager, Uttara Bank, Central Road Branch Rangpur and others
Dismissed
46
Md. Nazrul Islam vs. Md. Sukur Ali Sheikh and another
The Rule is made absolute.
47
Sree Ballov Chandra Das being dead his legal heirs- Uttam Chandra Namo and others -Versus- Abdul Motaleb and others
.
48
Md. Nurul Islam versus The Secretary, Ministry of Housing and Public Works, Bangladesh Secretariat, Ramna, Dhaka, and others
Discharged
49
Md. Hossen Ali being dead and his heir 1(Ka) Hamida Begum and others ...Petitioners -Versus- Sufia Haque and others …Opposite parties
Absolute
50
Md. Alauddin ... Convict-Appellant-Petitioner -Versus- The State and another ...Complainant-Respondent-Opposite Parties
The Rule is discharged
This Site is Visited :