|
Case Number
|
Parties |
Short Description |
|
1 |
Criminal Revision 915/2025
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 11-OCT-26
|
Anowar -Vs- The State |
It is notable that for grievous hurt there must exist an intention to cause such a hurt or knowledge that such an action would be the natural and probable consequences causing grievous hurt; otherwise, the hurt would be a simple one to cause simple hurt only.
The benefit of doubt must be given to the accused.
In a criminal case, the allegations have no legal value unless reliable and credible witnesses testify to them, and the prosecution must prove them beyond any reasonable doubt. |
|
2 |
Criminal Revision 3622/2022
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 11-OCT-26
|
Iqbal Hossain -Vs- The State and another |
Absolute based on the compromise petition. |
|
3 |
Criminal Revision 6176/2024
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 11-OCT-26
|
Mahbuba Mohammad Babon -Vs- The State and another |
The demand for money is not even alleged to be made as a consideration of the marriage. Neither money nor any other property can be said to be dowry unless they satisfy the definition of dowry as under the Act.
The language of Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act,1980 is clear and unambiguous, which suggests that the demand of dowry should be made to the parent or guardians of the bride or bridegroom, as the case may be, to bring a person under the dragnet of Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act,1980. |
|
4 |
Criminal Revision 2309/2016
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 11-OCT-26
|
Mst. Rotna Khatun -Vs- The State |
From a plain reading of sub-section (1) of section 103 of the Code of Criminal Procedure it is abundantly clear that the search by the Police must be conducted in the presence of at least two respectable inhabitants of the locality and the things which are to be seized in connection with any case are to be seized during the course of such search conducted in presence of at least two respectable local inhabitants. The requirements of sub-section (2) of section 103 read with sub-section (1) of section 103 are that the entire search from the beginning to the end must be conducted in the presence of two respectable local inhabitants and the requirements are not fulfilled if the search and the seizure have taken place either preceding the arrival of the local inhabitants or take place after they departed from the place of search. The provision relating to search and seizure provided in sub-section (1) and sub-section (2) of section 103 of the Code of Criminal Procedure are mandatory, and any search and seizure without strictly complying with the aforesaid provisions must be deemed to be illegal and as such, must be left out of consideration in a criminal trial. |
|
5 |
Criminal Appeal(H) 120/2024
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 11-OCT-26
|
Md. Rashel Uddin - Vs- The State and another |
The convict appellant demanded Tk.1,00,000/- for business purpose from his wife (complainant); therefore we are of the firm view that the prosecution failed to prove that the convict appellant demanded money as dowry at the relevant time of the occurrence. Therefore, the alleged demand of money of Tk. 1,00,000/- does not fall within the purview of the definition of dowry contemplated in section 2(ঞ ) of the Ain. |
|
6 |
Criminal Revision 6587/2024
(Jahor Miah -Vs- The State and another)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 11-OCT-26
|
|
“The learned Judges of the High Court Division failed to consider that from plain reading of the complaint, it is abundantly clear that it does not disclose any offense against the petitioner and that a normal financial deal between the debtor and creditor does not come within the scope of any offence and as such the impugned judgment and order is liable to be set aside for the ends of justice.” |
|
7 |
Civil Revision 5219/2024
(Civil Revision 5219/2024)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 08-OCT-26
|
Eakub Ali -Versus- Shanzida Nasrin |
The Rule 28 (1) (Ka) of the Muslim marriages and Divorces (Registration) Rules, 2009 formulates a Form for Nikahnama in which columns 13-15 are specifically endorsed with the amount of Mahr. prompt/deferred dowers, and the paid amount of mohrana, respectively, and thereby column 14 is beyond the ambit of the Qur`anic verses unless the bride agrees to the deferred dowers. Consequently, any kind of imposed deferred dower would be considered as prompt dower after being claimed by the wife. Prompt dower must be payable immediately or on demand, according to the terms of the marriage contract and applicable Muslim law, However, I am of the firm view that the wife must not wait until divorce or death to get the dower merely because the Nikahnama contains a dower obligation. The standard position is that prompt dower is a debt owed by the husband to the wife, and that it is an unsecured debt and an actionable claim; it must be paid forthwith, and if a wife has to come to Coult for realization of prompt dower, the trial Court has the discretion to award compensation to the wife on the basis of the facts of its own case, where the husband deferred the dower, having financial capacity. |
|
8 |
Civil Revision 6171/2022
(Civil Revision 6171/2022)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 06-OCT-26
|
Md. Ahamed Ali and others -Versus- Md. Abul Hossain and others |
Discharged |
|
9 |
Writ Petition 15214/2024
(Writ Petition 15214/2024)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 05-OCT-26
|
Fokhrul Hasan Vs. The Administrator, Sylhet City Corporation, Nagar Bhaban, Sylhet-3100 and others |
Disposed of |
|
10 |
Writ Petition 16666/2025
(Writ Petition 16666/2025)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 05-OCT-26
|
Md. Matiur Rahman and others Vs. Government of Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Public Affairs, Bangladesh Secretariat, P.S-Ramna, District-Dhaka and others |
Disposed of |
|
11 |
Writ Petition 7199/2025
(Writ Petition 7199/2025 with Writ Petition 17114/2025)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 05-OCT-26
|
M/S Abdul Malek Enterprise(In writ petition No. 7199 of 2025) and Md. Kibria Helal (In Writ Petition No. 17114 of 2025) Vs.Government of Bangladesh and others |
Writ Petition No. 7199 of 2025 is disposed of and Writ Petition No. 17114 of 2025 is made absolute-in-part. |
|
12 |
Writ Petition 2807/2025
(Writ Petition 2807/2025)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 05-OCT-26
|
Ahammad Ali Vs. The Government of Bangladesh, represented by its Secretary, Ministry of Local Government, Rural Development and Co-operatives, Bangladesh Secretariat, Ramna, Dhaka and others |
Absolute |
|
13 |
Writ Petition 3820/2021
(Writ Petition No. 3820/2021 with Writ Petition No. 3821/2021)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 05-OCT-26
|
Shahabuddin Ahmed vs The Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh, represented by the Deputy Commissioner and others |
Disposed of |
|
14 |
Writ Petition 7022/2021
(Writ Petition 7022/2021)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 04-OCT-26
|
Muhammad Kamruzzaman Talukder and others Vs The Government of Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Agriculture and others |
Disposed of |
|
15 |
Civil Revision 4906/2024
(Civil Revision 4906/2024)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 04-OCT-26
|
Md. Aynal Haque … Plaintiff-Petitioner Versus Md. Sohel Rana and others ... Defendant-Opposite parties |
Absolute |
|
16 |
Civil Revision 595/1995
(Civil Revision 595/1995)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 04-OCT-26
|
Sayed Ali and others … Defendant-Petitioners -Versus- Abdul Matin @ Matin Mia being dead his heirs: 1(a) Md. Abdur Rashid and others ...Plaintiff-Opposite Parties |
Disposed of |
|
18 |
Company Matter 191/2017
(Company Matter 191/2017)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 01-OCT-26
|
Abu Taber and others. -Versus- Newtex Group of Companies and others. |
This court is of the considered view that -
i) A composite application under section 43 of the Companies Act, 1994 is not rendered incompetent merely because it concerns the registers of different companies and the impugned transfers are evidenced by separate instruments, where the claims arise from a connected series of transactions and involve common questions of law or fact founded upon the same underlying transaction or event. While the relief under section 43 must be separately directed to the register of each company, the connected claims may, in appropriate circumstances, be adjudicated in one proceeding where separate proceedings would substantially involve the same evidence and foundational issues or risk inconsistent findings.
ii) Section 43 of the Companies Act, 1994 confers a wide jurisdiction upon the Court to rectify the register and, where necessary, to determine the title of a party to the proceeding; however, the jurisdiction is directed towards determining whether rectification is justified and does not require the Court to finally adjudicate every complex dispute concerning contracts, succession, minority, fraud and competing proprietary claims. A succession certificate relating to shares operates within the statutory scheme of Part X of the Succession Act, 1925, and shares constitute securities for the purposes of that Part.
iii) Where a company deals with the holder of a succession certificate in good faith, sections 381 and 386 of the Succession Act afford statutory protection to such dealings, notwithstanding the subsequent revocation or supersession of the certificate, where the statutory conditions are satisfied. Subsequent revocation of a succession certificate does not, by itself, retrospectively establish that every transaction undertaken while the certificate was operative was void or that the register of members must consequently be rectified.
iv) The absence of a fixed limitation period in section 43 does not make delay irrelevant. Where substantial delay is accompanied by the accrual of third-party rights and long-standing corporate entries, such circumstances may legitimately weigh against the discretionary relief of rectification.
v) Where the relief sought under section 43 substantially depends upon cancellation or invalidation of old instruments and upon the determination of complicated questions involving persons who are not parties to the proceeding, the Court may appropriately decline rectification without adjudicating those substantive claims finally.
vi) Refusal of rectification under section 43 does not, by itself, extinguish any independent substantive right which a claimant may have against a person who has unlawfully received property or consideration. Such rights remain subject to determination in an appropriate proceeding in accordance with law, consistent with section 387 of the Succession Act. |
|
19 |
Civil Revision 1325/2026
(Civil Revision 1325/2026)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 01-OCT-26
|
Khandakar Istiak Ahmed and others -Versus- Alhaz Md. Abdul Aziz Dhali and others |
The principle of functus officio is decision-specific, and the bottom line is judicial economy as well as the finality of litigation. Thus, a Court, having finally determined a particular matter, ordinarily becomes functus officio with regard to that determination; nevertheless, its jurisdiction is not thereby exhausted in respect of other matters in the proceedings, including execution or enforcement and such ancillary or further proceedings as may be expressly sanctioned by statute. The principle admits of limited exceptions where the impugned decision was made in excess of or without jurisdiction, is patently illegal, or was obtained by fraud. |
|
20 |
Admiralty Suit 2/2023
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 28-SEP-26
|
DRY BULK Shipping (PVT) Ltd. Vs. Bangladesh Chemical Industries Corporation and others. |
Suit dismissed |
|
21 |
Company Matter 30/2026
(Company Matter 30/2026)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 27-SEP-26
|
Fazila Khatun and others.-Versus- Bangla Eastern Industries Limited and others |
Allowed |
|
22 |
Company Matter 1885/2025
(.../)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 27-SEP-26
|
Fazila Khatun and others.-Versus- Bangla Eastern Industries Limited and others |
Dismissed |
|
23 |
Civil Revision 1219/2022
(Civil Revision 1219/2022)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 24-SEP-26
|
Square Pharmaceuticals Ltd. and anothers vs Md. Taizuddin and others |
Disposed of |
|
24 |
Death Reference 15/2019
(Death Reference 15/2019)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 23-SEP-26
|
The State ...petitioner -Versus- Md. Ameer Hossain ...condemned-prisoner |
In view of the discussions made hereinabove, we find no ground to accept death reference. Accordingly, the reference is rejected. The criminal Appeal is allowed and the Jail Appeal is disposed of. The judgment and order of conviction and sentence passed by the Tribunal against the condemned-prisoner is hereby set aside and he is acquitted of the charges levelled against him. |
|
25 |
Death Reference 43/2019
(Death Reference 43/2019)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 23-SEP-26
|
The State .....petitioner -Versus- Md. Suruz Ali .....condemned-prisoner |
In view of the discussion made hereinabove, the reference is rejected. The criminal appeal is dismissed but the sentence of death awarded upon the condemned-prisoner is commuted to imprisonment for life with fine. The condemned-prisoner will get the aid of section 35A of the Code of Criminal Procedure in calculating his sentence. The jail appeal is accordingly disposed of. |
|
26 |
First Appeal 38/2020
(First Appeal 38/2020)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 22-SEP-26
|
Agrani Bank Limited (now PLC) Vs. M/S Yanbar Agro Products Industries, Dhaka |
Ratio 3: Deterioration or destruction of secured goods does not, by itself, establish negligence or breach of duty by the lender. A claimant seeking compensation must prove the specific legal or contractual duty owed by the lender, the particular breach thereof, the direct causal connection between that breach and the loss, and the legally recoverable quantum of such loss. Where the borrower retained physical possession and control of the goods, sections 151 and 152 cannot be invoked merely because the lender held a security interest over them.
Ratio 4: A contractual allocation of risk concerning loss, damage or deterioration of secured goods is not rendered void under section 23 of the Contract Act merely because it operates to the disadvantage of the borrower, particularly where the borrower retained possession of the goods. Section 152 itself recognizes the relevance of a special contract. However, no contractual term can override a mandatory statutory duty or immunize a party from an otherwise established breach of such duty. The Blue Pencil Rule is a doctrine of severability and cannot be employed to rewrite the parties` contract or create a duty which the contract and law do not otherwise impose. |
|
27 |
Civil Revision 5158/2023
(Civil Revision 5158/2023)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 22-SEP-26
|
Sree Roton Kumar Biswas and another Vs. Sree Dilip and others |
Suit for declaration of title |
|
28 |
Civil Revision 38/2026
(Civil Revision 38/2026)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 22-SEP-26
|
Haji Md. Jouynal Abedin Vs. Md. Shah Alam alias Shah Alom Howlader and others |
Suit for declaration of title |
|
29 |
Civil Revision 2313/2026
(Civil Revision 2313/2026)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 22-SEP-26
|
Md. Rowshan Khan Sagor Vs. Most. Gul Nahar Begum and another |
Plaintiff filed a title suit for a decree of permanent injunction |
|
30 |
Civil Revision 5879/2022
(Civil Revision 5879/2022)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 21-SEP-26
|
Md. Azibor Rahman and others Vs. Most. Hena Rahman and others |
Suit for recovery of possession by evicting the defendants |
|
31 |
Civil Revision 661/2025
(Civil Revision 661/2025)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 21-SEP-26
|
Din Islam Sikder Vs. Afroza Begum and others |
Suit for Specific Performance of Contract |
|
32 |
Civil Revision 22/2013
(Civil Revision 22/2013)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 21-SEP-26
|
Kartick Chandra Saha -Vs- Government of the People`s Republic of Bangladesh Represented by the Deputy Commissioner, Tangail and others |
Absolute |
|
33 |
Civil Revision 2261/2010
(Civil Revision 2261/2010)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 20-SEP-26
|
Subir Mondal and others- Vs- Sanjoy Mondal @ MoIllick |
Discharged |
|
34 |
Writ Petition 2108/2011
(Writ Petition 2108/2011)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 20-SEP-26
|
Md. Saiful Islam @ Pavel -Vs- Bangladesh represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Law |
Discharged |
|
35 |
Admiralty Suit 4/2018
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 20-SEP-26
|
Midland Bank Limited Vs. M.V. KALAMATA TRADER and others. |
Application is allowed in modified form. |
|
36 |
Company Matter (TN) 512/2026
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 17-SEP-26
|
Chittagong Eye Infirmary and Training Complex (CEITC) Vs. Imperial Hospital Limited and others. |
Dismissed |
|
37 |
Company Matter 167/2024
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 16-SEP-26
|
Md. Shah Jahan Vs. RJSC and others |
Disposed of |
|
38 |
Company Matter (TN) 639/2026
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 16-SEP-26
|
Divine Cold Storage Limited Vs. RJSC |
Allowed. |
|
39 |
Company Matter (TN) 639/2026
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 16-SEP-26
|
Divine Cold Storage Limited Vs. RJSC |
allowed |
|
40 |
Company Matter 1916/2025
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 16-SEP-26
|
Modhumoti Bank PLC Vs. RJSC |
Allowed |
|
41 |
Writ Petition 11082/2015
(Writ Petition 11082/2015)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 15-SEP-26
|
Md. Omar Faruque ……. Petitioner Vs. Bangladesh and others …Respondents |
Absolute |
|
42 |
Writ Petition 9286/2017
(Writ Petition 9286/2017)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 15-SEP-26
|
Govt. of Bangladesh represented by the Deputy Commissioner, Narsingdi, District- Narsinngdi. ……. Petitioner Vs. Md. Osman Mia being died his legal heirs. ……Respondents |
Discharged |
|
43 |
Writ Petition 8699/2015
(Writ Petition 8699/2015)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 15-SEP-26
|
Md. Golam Mostafa ……. Petitioner Vs. Govt. of Bangladesh represented by the Senior Secretary, Ministry of Public Administration, Bangladesh Secretariat, Ramna, Dhaka and others ……Respondents |
Discharged. |
|
44 |
Writ Petition 8128/2023
(Writ Petition 8128/2023)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 15-SEP-26
|
Jamuna Fertilizer company Limited Represented by the Managing Director ……. Petitioner Vs. Govt. of Bangladesh represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Labour and employment, Bangladesh Secretariat, Ramna, Dhaka. ……Respondents |
Discharged |
|
45 |
Writ Petition 7401/2024
(Writ Petition 7401/2024)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 15-SEP-26
|
Md. Jahidul Islam ……. Petitioner Vs. Govt. of Bangladesh represented by the Ministry of Law and Justice Division and others ……Respondents |
Discharged. |
|
46 |
Writ Petition 6429/2009
(Writ Petition 6429/2009)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 15-SEP-26
|
Md.Fazlul Karim and another ……. Petitioners Vs. Govt. of Bangladesh represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Educationand others ……Respondents |
Discharged. |
|
47 |
Writ Petition 4334/2009
(Writ Petition 4334/2009)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 15-SEP-26
|
Md. Muzammel Haque ……. Petitioner Vs. Govt. of Bangladesh represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Educationand others …Respondents |
Absolute |
|
48 |
Writ Petition (TN) 3241/2216
(Writ Petition 3241/2216)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 15-SEP-26
|
Kazi Mohammad Moazzam Hossain ……. Petitioner Vs. Govt. of Bangladesh represented by the Ministry of Law, Justice and parlimentary Affairs, Dhaka. ……Respondents |
Discharged. |
|
49 |
Writ Petition 2339/2025
(Writ Petition 2339/2025)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 15-SEP-26
|
Md. Tariqul Islam ……. Petitioner Vs. Govt. of Bangladesh represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Power Energy and Mineral Recouse, Ramna, Dhaka and others …Respondents |
Absolute |
|
50 |
Writ Petition 2327/2022
(Writ Petition 2327/2022)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 15-SEP-26
|
Md. Nasir Uddin ……. Petitioner Vs. Govt. of Bangladesh represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Law, Justice and parlimentary Affairs, Bangladesh Secretariat Building, Ramna, Dhaka and others. …Respondents |
Discharged |
