: High Court Division Full List
 
Case Type : 
Case/Tender Number : 
Year : 
Parties : 
Short Description : 
 

Case Number Parties Short Description
1
Nazrul Islam Monju----Petitioner. -Versus- Government of Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Housing and Public Works----Respondents
As a result, the Rule Nisi is made absolute without any order as to costs.
2
Most. Ambia Khatun -Versus- Mst. Halima Begum and others
I am of the firm view that properly framing issues is a substantive procedural safeguard essential to a fair trial, confining adjudication to the actual controversy, and ensuring an effective determination. Consequently, the Court cannot adjudicate beyond the scope of the pleadings, nor can parties introduce a new case through evidence. However, failing to frame a material issue does not absolve the Court from deciding the real controversy, provided no prejudice occurs to the opposing party. Finally, the appellate court must ensure these safeguards by verifying that the trial court`s findings are fully supported by evidence tied directly to the settled issues.
3
Showkat Aziz and others. … Petitioners -Versus- Bangladesh Bank represented by its Governor, Bangladesh Bank Bhavan, Motijheel Commercial Area, Dhaka and others. … Respondents
Absolute
4
Mrs. Sufia Khatun versus Mohammad Mostafa Kamal and others
As per section 92 of the Evidence Act, 1872, the written terms of the contract cannot be altered or varied by oral evidence.
5
Cosmos Sea Foods Limited -Versus- Sonar Bangla Insurance and others
The First Appeal is dismissed.
6
Mr. Touhidul Islam Chaudhury, son of late Tariq Ahmed Choudhury and Mrs. Nurjahan Begum of House-27/E, Road-10, Banani Model Town, Dhaka-1213 and also at House No. 348, Road No. 05, DOHS, Baridhara-1212, Banani, Dhaka represented by his constituted lawful attorney- Md. Mostafizur Rahaman Saikot.-Vs-The learned Artha Rin Adalat No. 5, Dhaka and others.
Absolute
7
Abdul Mannan and others … Plaintiff-Petitioners Versus Government of Bangladesh and others ... Defendant-Opposite Parties
Absolute
8
Abdul Baset Majumder, being dead, his legal heirs: 1. Mossammat Rowshan Jahan Meherunnesa, wife of late Abdul Baset Majumder and others versus Rajdhani Unnayan Kartripakkha (RAJUK), represented by its Chairman, 1 RAJUK Bhaban, RAJUK Avenue, Motijheel, Dhaka-1000 and others
Discharged
9
Mohammad Asif -Versus- Government of the people’s Republic of Bangladesh, represented by the Deputy Commissioner, Dhaka and others
The First Appeal is allowed.
10
Md. Joynal Abedin -Versus- Md. Amzed Hossain Biswas, being dead, his heirs: 1(a) Md. Mostafa Kamal and others
So far as the existence of the R.S. record in the name of the opposite party, I am of the view that the R.S. record prepared and published in the opposite party`s name while a pre-emption case is pending does not, if that case ends unsuccessfully, confer legal entitlement on that party.
11
Samirendra Guha Roy -Versus- Shabana Khatun and others
The First Appeal is allowed.
12
Mohammad Hanif being dead his heirs- Rubaiyat Hanif and others -Versus- Government of Bangladesh represented by the Deputy Commissioner, Dhaka and others
.
13
Bank Asia Limited, Agrabad Brahch, Chattogram and another -Versus- Jamuna Bank Limited, Anderkilla Brahch, Chattogram
.
14
S. M. Jahangir Habib -Versus- Assistant Commissioners (Land), Khulna and others
The First Appeal is allowed.
15
Md. Farid Ahmed being dead his heirs- Mst. Saleha Begum and others -Versus- Abdur Rop @ Rouf and others
The First Appeal is allowed.
16
Shree Ananta Kumar Aich, being dead, his legal heirs are- 1(a) Anjali Kumar Aich and others -Versus- Shree Sadhon Bhowmik and others
Discharged
17
Md. Hanif Ali -Versus- Md. Sirajul Islam and others
.
18
Md. Akramul Haque Chowdhury Vs. the Artha Rin Adalat No. 3, Dhaka and others
summarily rejected
19
Khurshida Akter and others Vs. The Artha Rin Adalat and others
Disposed of
20
Tahmid Enterprise Vs. Bangladesh and others
Disposed of
21
M.A. Salam Molla Vs. Bangladesh and others
Discharged
22
Tahmid Enterprise Vs. Bangladesh and others
Rule Absolute
23
Md. Mostafa Amzad Hossain Vs. The Artah Rin Adalat No. 2, Dhaka and others
Rule absolute
24
Md. Abdul Majid Pondit, being dead, his heirs Md. Iqbal Hossain and others -Versus- Most. Sakena Khatun and others
In the case of a fraudulent instrument, no declaration of title is required where the plaintiff or his predecessor is admittedly the owner of the property included in the alleged instrument, and any instrument without the evidence of due registration cannot be taken, and the said registration itself does not create any evidence of execution.
25
M/s. Faridpur Himagar Limited and others Vs. the Artha Rin Adalat No. 1, Faridpur and others
Summarily rejected
26
Jahurul Islam Medical College and Hospital Vs. NBR and others
Absolute
27
Md. Shohel Vuyea Vs. Bangladesh Bank and others
Disposed of
28
D.H. Euro Hi Tech Co. (BD) Limited Vs. Bangladesh and others
Discharged
29
Mohammad Anowar Hossain Vs. Bangladesh Bank
discharged
30
Kenpark Bangladesh (pvt.) Ltd. Vs. Bangladesh Bank
Discharged
31
Navana Pharmaceuticals PLC Vs. Bangladesh and others
Summarily rejected
32
Janata Bank Limited Vs. Artha Rin Adalat, Dhaka and another
Rule disposed of
33
M/s. Hazi Textile Mills and another
Summarily rejected
34
The State .....petitioner -Versus- Momin Gazi (absconding) .....condemned-convict
In the premises above, this reference is accepted. The judgment and order of conviction and sentence of death passed by the Tribunal is hereby confirmed. The concerned authority is directed to secure the arrest of the condemned-convict to execute his sentence of death.
35
The State .... petitioner -Versus- Md. Kamrul Islam .... condemned-prisoner
Therefore, the reference is rejected. Criminal Appeal 8670 of 2019 is also dismissed. But the sentence of death awarded to the condemned-prisoner is commuted to imprisonment for life. The Jail Appeal is accordingly disposed of. The condemned-prisoner shall get the aid of section 35A of the Coe of Criminal Procedure. The condemned-prisoner is to be shifted from condemned-cell to the cell meant for the prisoners alike.
36
Tofayel Ahmed Azad Vs. Bangladesh and others
Disposed of
37
S.M. Parvez Vs. Bangladesh and others
Discharged
38
Mohammad Monjurul Islam Vs. Bangladesh and others
Discharged
39
Sahinul Islam Vs. Bangladesh and others
Disposed of
40
Md. Kabir Ahmed Vs. Bangladesh Bank and others
Discharged
41
Md. Saidur Kabir @ Mukul and others ...........Convict-Appellants -Versus- The State and another ------- Respondents.
Allowed in part.
42
Md. Naziullaha Rahman (Rana) ...........accused-petitioner -Versus- The State and another ------- opposite parties
Disposed of
43
Abul Kalam ...........Convict-petitioner -Versus- The State ------- opposite party
Absolute
44
Md. Abul Kasem Vs. Bangladesh and others
Discharged
45
Md. Rezoyanul Haque vs Mrs. Sharmin Khatun
The Rule is disposed of.
46
Krishna Pada Das vs Biddah Sagor Das and others
The Rule is disposed of.
47
Siddique Ara Begum and others vs Fazle Rashid Chowdhury and others
The Rule is made Absolute
48
Md. Ekhlash Uddin vs Mukta Begum and others
The Rule is discharged.
49
Mahbubul Alam and others
Bangladesh and others
50
Md. Liakot Ali
Bangladesh Bank and others
This Site is Visited :