|
Case Number
|
Parties |
Short Description |
|
1 |
First Appeal 94/2020
(First Appeal 94/2020)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 09-NOV-26
|
Md. Baccu Miah and others -Versus- Md. Nur Uddin and others |
The First Appeal is allowed. |
|
2 |
Writ Petition 1556/2015
(.../)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 09-NOV-26
|
Mohammad Nazmul Haider Chowdhury Vs. Government of Bangladesh represented by the Secretary Ministry of land, Bangladesh Secretariat, Ramna, Dhaka and others. |
Section 2(4) of the Power of Attorney Act, 2012 defines an irrevocable Power of Attorney by reference to the nature and purpose of the transaction. Section 4(6) provides for the devolution of rights and liabilities arising out of an irrevocable Power of Attorney upon the lawful heirs or successors of the deceased or legally incapacitated person, subject to the statutory proviso. Similarly, section 11(1)(d) excludes an irrevocable Power of Attorney from the general rule of termination upon the death of the donor.
Upon a harmonious interpretation of the aforesaid provisions, we are of the considered view that an irrevocable Power of Attorney coupled with consideration and interest stands on a different footing from an ordinary Power of Attorney. Where the attorney has acquired a subsisting interest in the subject matter of the agency through a lawful transaction, the instrument cannot be treated as a mere delegation of authority divorced from the underlying transaction. Nor can the interest so acquired be defeated merely by the death of the principal. |
|
3 |
Writ Petition 7673/2019
(Writ Petition 7673/2019)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 09-NOV-26
|
Joyrath Paul and others Vs. Government of Bangladesh represented by the Secretary Ministry of Land, Bangladesh Secretariat, Ramna, Dhaka and others. |
In considering the matter, we find it necessary to refer to the provisions of Clause (kha) of Section 12 of the Orpito Sampatti Prottyarpan Ain, 2001. The said provision makes it clear that an order directing release of any property from the list of vested properties shall not, by itself, be deemed to declare or confirm the title, possession or any other right of the applicant in respect of the property so released. In other words, the jurisdiction of the Tribunal under the said Act is confined to examining the legality of the inclusion of the property in the list of vested properties and determining whether the applicant is entitled to have the property released from such list. Such an order does not operate as a declaration of title or confirmation of possession in favour of the applicant.
Upon a conjoint reading of Sections 10, 12 and 17 of the Orpito Sampatti Prottyarpan Ain, 2001, we are of the view that the jurisdiction of the Tribunal is confined to determining whether the property in question has been lawfully included in the list of vested properties and whether the applicant has established a prima facie claim entitling him to obtain an order for release of the property from the said list. The Tribunal is not vested with the jurisdiction to conclusively adjudicate upon competing claims of title, ownership or possession between rival claimants. |
|
4 |
Writ Petition 7238/2018
(.../)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 09-NOV-26
|
Md. Tayab Uddin Vs. Government of Bangladesh represented by the Secretary Ministry of Secondary and Higher Education, Bangladesh Secretariat, Ramna, Dhaka and others. |
We are conscious of the settled principle of law that the grant of MPO benefits is a matter of Government policy and that an employee of a non-government educational institution cannot claim such benefits as a matter of absolute right. In this regard, the Appellate Division, in Government of Bangladesh and others v. Md. Nazrul Islam and others, reported in 27 BLT (AD) 167, observed that MPO benefits are granted in accordance with Government policy and that such benefits cannot be claimed as a matter of right in the absence of infringement of any legally enforceable right or violation of law.
The aforesaid principle has also been reiterated by the Appellate Division in Government of the People`s Republic of Bangladesh and others v. Ismat Ara Jahan and others, reported in 12 LM (AD) 290; Government and others v. Md. Mainul Haq and others, reported in 12 LM (AD) 345; and Government of Bangladesh and others v. Md. Musabbir Mamun and others, reported in 15 LM (AD) 98. |
|
5 |
Civil Revision 4064/2022
(Civil Revision 4064/2022)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 09-NOV-26
|
Md. Khabir Uddin and others Vs. Md. Ali Akbor and others |
Suit for declaration |
|
6 |
Civil Revision 1596/2023
(Civil Revision 1596/2023)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 09-NOV-26
|
Md. Abdur Rashid and others Vs. Md. Mokaram Hossain and others |
Title Suit |
|
7 |
Civil Revision 2091/2024
(Civil Revision 2091/2024)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 09-NOV-26
|
Sree Joyanto Kumar Roy and another Vs. Dinesh Chandra Roy and others |
This suit for permanent injunction |
|
8 |
Civil Revision 112/2026
(Civil Revision 112/2026)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 09-NOV-26
|
Meghna Star Cables and Electrical Appliances Ltd Vs. Director Procurement Bangladesh Rural Electrification Board (BREB) and others |
This is an arbitration case under Section 7A of the Arbitration Act, 2001 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure |
|
9 |
First Appeal 200/1995
(First Appeal 200/1995)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 09-NOV-26
|
Syeda Shaira Mohsin and others |
Disposed of |
|
10 |
Criminal Revision 1317/2024
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 09-NOV-26
|
Prodip Mondal -Versus- The State and another |
|
|
11 |
Writ Petition 2440/2025
(Writ Petition 2440/2025)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 08-NOV-26
|
Md. Shahajahan Sarder and another. -Versus- The Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh and others. |
A public authority, while discharging its statutory and administrative responsibilities, is under an obligation to act fairly, reasonably and in accordance with law. Where a representation has been duly submitted before the competent authority, the authority concerned is required to apply its independent mind to the issues raised therein and arrive at a decision by considering the relevant facts, applicable laws and Rules. The decision may be either in favour of or against the person making the representation; however, the authority must communicate its decision through a reasoned order. Keeping such a representation pending without any decision or communication, particularly for an indefinite period, cannot be regarded as a fair or satisfactory discharge of public duty. |
|
12 |
Income Tax Reference 61/2011
(Income Tax Reference 61/2011)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 08-NOV-26
|
N. Mohammad Plastic Industries Limited Vs. Commissioner of Taxes |
the reference application is disposed of |
|
13 |
Civil Revision 3650/2003
(Civil Revision 3650/2003)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 08-NOV-26
|
Abul Bashar Patwary and another -Versus- On the death of op No. 1, her heirs are already on record: Sirajul Islam and others |
Absolute |
|
14 |
Civil Revision 2069/2019
(Civil Revision 2069/2019)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 08-NOV-26
|
Abul Fayez Md. Mahbubul Haque and another -Versus- Mst. Sabekunnahar and others |
Absolute |
|
15 |
Civil Revision 3407/2024
(Civil Revision 3407/2024)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 08-NOV-26
|
Most. Ambia Khatun -Versus- Mst. Halima Begum and others |
I am of the firm view that properly framing issues is a substantive procedural safeguard essential to a fair trial, confining adjudication to the actual controversy, and ensuring an effective determination. Consequently, the Court cannot adjudicate beyond the scope of the pleadings, nor can parties introduce a new case through evidence. However, failing to frame a material issue does not absolve the Court from deciding the real controversy, provided no prejudice occurs to the opposing party. Finally, the appellate court must ensure these safeguards by verifying that the trial court`s findings are fully supported by evidence tied directly to the settled issues. |
|
16 |
Writ Petition 681/2025
(WP_681_2025)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 05-NOV-26
|
Nazrul Islam Monju----Petitioner. -Versus- Government of Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Housing and Public Works----Respondents |
As a result, the Rule Nisi is made absolute without any order as to costs. |
|
17 |
Writ Petition 2165/2025
(Writ Petition 2165/2025)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 04-NOV-26
|
Showkat Aziz and others. … Petitioners -Versus- Bangladesh Bank represented by its Governor, Bangladesh Bank Bhavan, Motijheel Commercial Area, Dhaka and others. … Respondents |
Absolute |
|
18 |
First Appeal 400/2015
(As per section 92 of the Evidence Act, 1872, the written terms of the contract, can not be altered or varied by oral evidence.)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 03-NOV-26
|
Mrs. Sufia Khatun versus Mohammad Mostafa Kamal and others |
As per section 92 of the Evidence Act, 1872, the written terms of the contract cannot be altered or varied by oral evidence. |
|
19 |
First Appeal 719/2019
(First Appeal 719/2019)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 02-NOV-26
|
Cosmos Sea Foods Limited -Versus- Sonar Bangla Insurance and others |
The First Appeal is dismissed. |
|
20 |
Writ Petition 2498/2026
(Writ Petition)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 02-NOV-26
|
Mr. Touhidul Islam Chaudhury, son of late Tariq Ahmed Choudhury and Mrs. Nurjahan Begum of House-27/E, Road-10, Banani Model Town, Dhaka-1213 and also at House No. 348, Road No. 05, DOHS, Baridhara-1212, Banani, Dhaka represented by his constituted lawful attorney- Md. Mostafizur Rahaman Saikot.-Vs-The learned Artha Rin Adalat No. 5, Dhaka and others. |
Absolute |
|
21 |
Civil Revision 4059/2008
(Civil Revision 4059/2008)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 01-NOV-26
|
Abdul Mannan and others … Plaintiff-Petitioners Versus Government of Bangladesh and others ... Defendant-Opposite Parties |
Absolute |
|
22 |
Writ Petition 11828/2016
(Writ Petition 11828/2016)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 01-NOV-26
|
Abdul Baset Majumder, being dead, his legal heirs: 1. Mossammat Rowshan Jahan Meherunnesa, wife of late Abdul Baset Majumder and others versus Rajdhani Unnayan Kartripakkha (RAJUK), represented by its Chairman, 1 RAJUK Bhaban, RAJUK Avenue, Motijheel, Dhaka-1000 and others |
Discharged |
|
23 |
First Appeal 18/2018
(First Appeal 18/2018)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 28-OCT-26
|
Mohammad Asif -Versus- Government of the people’s Republic of Bangladesh, represented by the Deputy Commissioner, Dhaka and others |
The First Appeal is allowed. |
|
24 |
Civil Revision 1467/2025
(Civil Revision 1467/2025)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 28-OCT-26
|
Md. Joynal Abedin -Versus- Md. Amzed Hossain Biswas, being dead, his heirs: 1(a) Md. Mostafa Kamal and others |
So far as the existence of the R.S. record in the name of the opposite party, I am of the view that the R.S. record prepared and published in the opposite party`s name while a pre-emption case is pending does not, if that case ends unsuccessfully, confer legal entitlement on that party. |
|
25 |
First Appeal 504/2000
(First Appeal 504/2000)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 28-OCT-26
|
Samirendra Guha Roy -Versus- Shabana Khatun and others |
The First Appeal is allowed. |
|
26 |
First Appeal (TN) 311/20116
(First Appeal (TN) 311/20116)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 27-OCT-26
|
Mohammad Hanif being dead his heirs- Rubaiyat Hanif and others -Versus- Government of Bangladesh represented by the Deputy Commissioner, Dhaka and others |
. |
|
27 |
First Appeal 37/2022
(First Appeal 37/2022)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 27-OCT-26
|
Bank Asia Limited, Agrabad Brahch, Chattogram and another -Versus- Jamuna Bank Limited, Anderkilla Brahch, Chattogram |
. |
|
28 |
First Appeal 639/2019
(First Appeal 639/2019)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 27-OCT-26
|
S. M. Jahangir Habib -Versus- Assistant Commissioners (Land), Khulna and others |
The First Appeal is allowed. |
|
29 |
First Appeal 290/2014
(First Appeal 290/2014)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 27-OCT-26
|
Md. Farid Ahmed being dead his heirs- Mst. Saleha Begum and others -Versus- Abdur Rop @ Rouf and others |
The First Appeal is allowed. |
|
30 |
Civil Revision 2692/2017
(Civil Revision 2692/2017)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 27-OCT-26
|
Shree Ananta Kumar Aich, being dead, his legal heirs are- 1(a) Anjali Kumar Aich and others -Versus- Shree Sadhon Bhowmik and others |
Discharged |
|
31 |
First Misc Appeal 130/2026
(First Misc Appeal 130/2026)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 27-OCT-26
|
Md. Hanif Ali -Versus- Md. Sirajul Islam and others |
. |
|
32 |
Writ Petition 8897/2026
(Writ Petition 8897/2026)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 26-OCT-26
|
Md. Akramul Haque Chowdhury Vs. the Artha Rin Adalat No. 3, Dhaka and others |
summarily rejected |
|
33 |
Writ Petition 5124/2010
(Writ Petition 5124/2010)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 26-OCT-26
|
Khurshida Akter and others Vs. The Artha Rin Adalat and others |
Disposed of |
|
34 |
Writ Petition 15827/2025
(Writ Petition 15827/2025)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 26-OCT-26
|
Tahmid Enterprise Vs. Bangladesh and others |
Disposed of |
|
35 |
Writ Petition 15255/2025
(Writ Petition 15255/2025)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 26-OCT-26
|
M.A. Salam Molla Vs. Bangladesh and others |
Discharged |
|
36 |
Writ Petition 18812/2025
(Writ Petition 18812/2025)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 26-OCT-26
|
Tahmid Enterprise Vs. Bangladesh and others |
Rule Absolute |
|
37 |
Writ Petition 6241/2023
(Writ Petition 6241/2023)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 26-OCT-26
|
Md. Mostafa Amzad Hossain Vs. The Artah Rin Adalat No. 2, Dhaka and others |
Rule absolute |
|
38 |
Civil Revision 4257/2001
(Civil Revision 4257/2001)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 26-OCT-26
|
Md. Abdul Majid Pondit, being dead, his heirs Md. Iqbal Hossain and others -Versus- Most. Sakena Khatun and others |
In the case of a fraudulent instrument, no declaration of title is required where the plaintiff or his predecessor is admittedly the owner of the property included in the alleged instrument, and any instrument without the evidence of due registration cannot be taken, and the said registration itself does not create any evidence of execution. |
|
39 |
Writ Petition 1304/2026
(Writ Petition 1304/2026)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 26-OCT-26
|
M/s. Faridpur Himagar Limited and others Vs. the Artha Rin Adalat No. 1, Faridpur and others |
Summarily rejected |
|
40 |
Writ Petition 6249/2025
(Writ Petition 6249/2025)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 26-OCT-26
|
Jahurul Islam Medical College and Hospital Vs. NBR and others |
Absolute |
|
41 |
Writ Petition 7971/2025
(Writ Petition 7971/2025)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 26-OCT-26
|
Md. Shohel Vuyea Vs. Bangladesh Bank and others |
Disposed of |
|
42 |
Writ Petition 12719/2024
(Writ Petition 12719/2024)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 26-OCT-26
|
D.H. Euro Hi Tech Co. (BD) Limited Vs. Bangladesh and others |
Discharged |
|
43 |
Writ Petition 14859/2024
(Writ Petition 14859/2024)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 26-OCT-26
|
Mohammad Anowar Hossain Vs. Bangladesh Bank |
discharged |
|
44 |
Writ Petition 15440/2025
(Writ Petition 15440/2025)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 26-OCT-26
|
Kenpark Bangladesh (pvt.) Ltd. Vs. Bangladesh Bank |
Discharged |
|
45 |
Writ Petition 443/2026
(Writ Petition 443/2026)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 26-OCT-26
|
Navana Pharmaceuticals PLC Vs. Bangladesh and others |
Summarily rejected |
|
46 |
Writ Petition 10552/2024
(Writ Petition 10552/2024)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 26-OCT-26
|
Janata Bank Limited Vs. Artha Rin Adalat, Dhaka and another |
Rule disposed of |
|
47 |
Writ Petition 17593/2025
(Writ Petition 17593/2025)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 26-OCT-26
|
M/s. Hazi Textile Mills and another |
Summarily rejected |
|
48 |
Death Reference 100/2019
(Death Reference 100/2019)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 26-OCT-26
|
The State .....petitioner -Versus- Momin Gazi (absconding) .....condemned-convict |
In the premises above, this reference is accepted. The judgment and order of conviction and sentence of death passed by the Tribunal is hereby confirmed.
The concerned authority is directed to secure the arrest of the condemned-convict to execute his sentence of death. |
|
49 |
Death Reference 82/2019
(Death Reference 82/2019)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 26-OCT-26
|
The State .... petitioner -Versus- Md. Kamrul Islam .... condemned-prisoner |
Therefore, the reference is rejected. Criminal Appeal 8670 of 2019 is also dismissed. But the sentence of death awarded to the condemned-prisoner is commuted to imprisonment for life. The Jail Appeal is accordingly disposed of. The condemned-prisoner shall get the aid of section 35A of the Coe of Criminal Procedure.
The condemned-prisoner is to be shifted from condemned-cell to the cell meant for the prisoners alike. |
|
50 |
Writ Petition 7516/2025
(Writ Petition 7516/2025)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 26-OCT-26
|
Tofayel Ahmed Azad Vs. Bangladesh and others |
Disposed of |
