|
Case Number
|
Parties |
Short Description |
|
1 |
Civil Revision 2518/2017
(Civil Revision 2518/2017)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 03-SEP-26
|
Hosne Ara ... Defendant No.2-Petitioner Versus Government Haji Mohammad Mohsin College and others ...Opposite Parties |
The Rule is discharged without any order as to costs. |
|
2 |
Death Reference 95/2018
(Death Reference 95/2018)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 03-SEP-26
|
The State Vs. Most. Lucky Khatun and another |
The Death Reference is rejected with modification of sentence; consequently the Criminal Appeal No.8455 of 2018 and Jail Appeal No.247of 2018 are dismissed with modification of sentence. |
|
3 |
Death Reference 75/2018
(Death Reference 75/2018)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 02-SEP-26
|
The State … Appellant -Versus- Md. Sohel Biswash ….Condemned-Prisoner |
the Death Reference No. 75 of 2018 is rejected and both the Criminal Appeal No.7561 of 2018 and Jail Appeal No.212 of 2018 are hereby dismissed. |
|
4 |
Civil Revision 4266/2015
(Civil Revision 4266/2015)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 02-SEP-26
|
Md. Mizanur Rahman …Appellant-Petitioner Versus Mosammot Rasheda Khatun and another ...Defendant-Opposite parties |
Absolute-in-part |
|
5 |
Civil Revision 4894/2024
(Civil Revision 4894/2024)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 02-SEP-26
|
Mst. Nestara Begum Vs Md. Tohirul Islam and others |
Discharged |
|
6 |
Civil Revision 710/2017
(Civil Revision 710/2017)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 02-SEP-26
|
Md. Babul Islam -Versus- Md. Alimuddin and others |
Absolute, sending the case on remand to the trial Court. |
|
7 |
Civil Revision 3875/2022
(Civil Revision 3875/2022)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 02-SEP-26
|
Maulana Nurul Islam -Versus- Mawlana A.B.M Nuruzzaman and another |
Discharged |
|
8 |
Writ Petition 5568/2019
(Writ Petition 5568/2019)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 02-SEP-26
|
Pochondor Ali and others versus Bangladesh, represented by the Deputy Commissioner, Sunamganj and others |
Absolute in part |
|
9 |
Writ Petition 7055/2025
(.../)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 02-SEP-26
|
Rujina Akhter vs Government of Bangladesh and others |
Judgment of Habeus Corpus |
|
10 |
Civil Revision 3118/2022
(Civil Revision 3118/2022)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 02-SEP-26
|
Masudur Rahman and others -Versus- Md. Anowar Hossain and others |
Discharged with costs |
|
11 |
Writ Petition 1098/2013
(.../)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 02-SEP-26
|
S.M. Md. Abdul Baten and others vs.Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh, represented by the Senior Secretary, Ministry of Public Administration and another |
Absolute |
|
12 |
Civil Revision 2741/2018
(Civil Revision 2741/2018)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 02-SEP-26
|
Md. Abul Karim Molla Vs Md. Sadek Ali Molla and others |
Absolute |
|
13 |
Civil Revision 3791/2017
(Civil Revision 3791/2017)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 02-SEP-26
|
Subash Chandra Dey -Versus- Shaymal Chandra Sheel and others |
Absolute |
|
14 |
First Appeal 31/2026
(First Appeal 31/2026)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 01-SEP-26
|
Laxmi Bilders Limited -Versus- Masons Enterprise Limited and others |
This First Appeal is allowed. |
|
15 |
Company Matter 860/2024
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 01-SEP-26
|
ICE(BD) Limited Vs. Chandra Spinning Mills Limited and another |
Application for addition of party is rejected with cost of Tk. 10,000/- |
|
16 |
Civil Revision 67/2022
(Civil Revision 67/2022)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 01-SEP-26
|
Most. Aliya Vs Md. Saidur Rahman |
Discharged |
|
17 |
Writ Petition 5029/2021
(Writ Petition 5029/2021)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 01-SEP-26
|
Md. Belayet Hossain and others-Vs-Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Water Resources and others |
Discharged |
|
18 |
Writ Petition 323/2023
(Writ Petition 323/2023)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 01-SEP-26
|
Md. Kamruzzaman-Vs-Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Power, Energy and Mineral Recourses and others |
Discharged |
|
19 |
Writ Petition 13635/2024
(Writ Petition 13635/2024)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 01-SEP-26
|
Laila Shahed-Vs-Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Defence and others |
Discharged |
|
20 |
Criminal Revision (TN) 4901/2023
(Criminal Revision No. 4901/2023)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 01-SEP-26
|
Sobuj Sheikh ...Convict- Petitioner. -Versus- The State and another ............... Opposite Parties. |
The Rule is discharged |
|
21 |
Criminal Revision (TN) 4403/2025
(Criminal Revision)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 01-SEP-26
|
Md. Mojibur Rahman -vs- The State and another |
Absolute |
|
22 |
Criminal Misc 48205/2021
(Criminal Misc 48205/2021)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 01-SEP-26
|
Shahid Ul Hasan Vs the State and another |
Discharged |
|
23 |
Admiralty Suit 28/2026
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 01-SEP-26
|
LUFESA DIVER`S SCRL -VS-M.V. PRINCESS JIA JIA AND OTHERS |
Application is allowed. |
|
24 |
Criminal Misc 32601/2025
(Criminal Misc 32601/2025)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 01-SEP-26
|
Mohammad Salauddin Khan Vs the State and another |
Disposed of |
|
25 |
Criminal Misc 54742/2022
(Criminal Misc 54742/2022)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 01-SEP-26
|
Most. Akhi Begum Vs the State and another |
Absolute |
|
26 |
Company Matter 693/2026
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 01-SEP-26
|
Abdullah Ahmed Vs. The Registrar, Joint Stock Companies and Firms and others. |
Dismissed with cost of Tk. 50,000/- |
|
27 |
Writ Petition 5568/2019
(WP_5568_2019)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 31-AUG-26
|
Pochondor Ali and others vs Bangladesh, represented by the Deputy Commissioner, Sunamganj and others |
Absolute in part |
|
28 |
Civil Revision 2271/2024
(Civil Revision 2271/2024)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 31-AUG-26
|
Moslem Gazi and others -Versus- Md. Ismail and others |
Disposed of |
|
29 |
Company Matter (TN) 709/2026
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 30-AUG-26
|
Towhid Samad and others Vs. The Registrar, Joint Stock Companies and Firms and others. |
Dismissed |
|
30 |
Writ Petition 11760/2015
(Writ Petition 11760/2015)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 30-AUG-26
|
Mohd. Akhtaruzzaman vs Government of Bangladesh and others. |
... |
|
31 |
Civil Revision 163/2007
(Civil Revision 163/2007)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 30-AUG-26
|
Nasiruddin Mollah and others … Pre-emptee-Petitioners -Versus- Motaleb Mollah and others ...Pre-emptor -Opposite Parties |
Discharged |
|
32 |
First Appeal 17/2012
(First Appeal 17/2012)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 30-AUG-26
|
Abul Kashem and another ... Defendant-Appellants -Versus- Sufia Begum being died her heirs 1(1) Abul Hossain and others ... Plaintiff-Respondents |
Allowed |
|
33 |
Criminal Appeal(H) (TN) 10561/2019
(Criminal Appeal No. 10561/2019)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 30-AUG-26
|
Md. Shafiqul Islam ... Convict-Appellant -Versus- The State and another ... Respondents |
The appeal is allowed |
|
34 |
Criminal Appeal(H) (TN) 9039/2023
(Criminal Appeal No. 9039/2023)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 30-AUG-26
|
Abdul Kuddus Khan ... Appellant -Versus- The State and another ... Respondents |
The appeal is dismissed |
|
35 |
Civil Revision 1772/2021
(Civil Revision 1772/2021)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 30-AUG-26
|
Md. Abdul Jalil, being dead, his legal heirs:- 1(a) Most Nazma Begum and others -Versus- Md. Azam Ali Miah, being dead, his legal heirs:- 1(a) Malek Miah and others |
Absolute with costs |
|
36 |
First Appeal 209/2011
(First Appeal 209/2011)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 30-AUG-26
|
Shukur Ali Master and others -Versus- Doraj Kazi and others |
. |
|
37 |
First Misc Appeal 339/2018
(.../)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 30-AUG-26
|
Mohammad Ali and others Vs. Abdul Jabber alias Vatesh and others |
It is well settled that an order of remand is not to be made as a matter of course. Remand should not be ordered merely to enable a party to fill up a lacuna caused by his own negligence or laches. At the same time, where the Court is satisfied that a party was prevented from effectively contesting the suit for reasons not attributable to deliberate or culpable conduct on his part, and that denial of an opportunity to contest would cause substantial prejudice, the Court may, in the interest of justice, exercise its discretion to remand the matter.
A compromise between some of the parties cannot, in law, operate to extinguish or adversely affect the independent rights claimed by non-consenting parties without adjudication of their claims. |
|
38 |
Civil Revision 2326/2021
(Civil Revision 2326/2021)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 30-AUG-26
|
Shahe Alam Kazi and others Vs Shahe Alam and others |
Absolute |
|
39 |
Criminal Revision 1935/2026
(Criminal Revision 1935/2026)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 27-AUG-26
|
Md. Shibul Hossain vs. The state |
Absolute |
|
40 |
Writ Petition 13465/2019
(Writ Petition 13465/2019)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 27-AUG-26
|
Rafiqul Islam and another -Versus- The Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Primary and Mass Education, Bangladesh Secretariat, Ramna, Dhaka-1000; and others |
Disposed of |
|
41 |
Company Matter 607/2026
(Company Matter 607/2026)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 25-AUG-26
|
Prof. Dr. Abul Kashem. -Versus- Registrar of Joint Stock Companies and Firms and others. |
i) Dispatching notice packages via a private commercial courier agency constituted "personal service." This argument misconstrues the legal nature of personal service. Personal service in company law requires direct physical delivery by an officer, agent, or employee acting directly on behalf of the company to the recipient member. When a company hands over thousands of sealed envelopes to an independent third-party commercial courier company, it engages an intermediary logistics provider. The courier`s sub-agents or delivery staff are not company officers delivering notice personally; they are executing a contract of carriage. Courier delivery cannot be conflated with personal delivery.
ii) Equally untenable is the proposition that courier delivery is equivalent to "service by post." In statutory construction, "post" refers specifically to the statutory postal system operated under the authority of the State (e.g., the Post Office Act). The legal deeming presumption established under Article 86(2) and reflected in Section 27 of the General Clauses Act, 1897 attaches strictly to letters placed in the official postal network with postage prepaid. Courts cannot stretch clear contractual text to read private commercial courier services into the word "post." While modern commercial practice frequently uses courier networks for speed and tracking, corporate constitutions must be amended through proper general body resolutions if modern delivery methods are to be adopted. Until the Articles are formally altered, the company remains bound by its existing contractual provisions. |
|
42 |
Arbitration Application 14/2023
(Arbitration Application 14/2023)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 25-AUG-26
|
Manikganj Power Generations Limited.-Versus- Yew Choon Private Limited |
i) The distinction between the legal burden and the evidential burden must be carefully maintained. The legal burden of establishing the claim remained throughout upon the respondent as claimant. However, once the respondent/claimant had adduced evidence capable of supporting its case, the Tribunal was fully entitled to examine whether the petitioner had produced evidence explaining or rebutting facts lying particularly within its “own knowledge”. The Tribunal`s observations regarding the inadequacy of the petitioner`s evidence, therefore, relate to the weight and sufficiency of the rebuttal evidence rather than to any impermissible reversal of the legal burden of proof. ii) In substance, the petitioner`s grievance is that the Tribunal ought to have attached greater weight to the petitioner`s evidence and lesser weight to the respondent`s evidence. Such a contention goes to the appreciation of evidence rather than to the legality of the award. Section 43 does not permit this Court to undertake a fresh evaluation of the evidence for the purpose of determining whether another conclusion would have been preferable. iii) After considering the overall outcome of the arbitration, the Tribunal regarded the respondent as the substantially successful party and exercised the statutory discretion vested in it under section 38 by directing the petitioner to bear the respondent`s costs. Such an exercise of discretion cannot be said to be irrational merely because another tribunal, or even this Court, might have apportioned the costs differently. To interfere with the award of costs in the present case would require this Court to substitute its own discretion for that of the Tribunal. Such an approach would be inconsistent with the limited supervisory jurisdiction conferred by section 43 of the Arbitration Act and would undermine the legislative policy of according finality to arbitral awards. |
|
43 |
Company Matter 125/2016
(Company Matter 125/2016)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 25-AUG-26
|
Rokaiya Nasrin, -Versus- Neptune Cold Storage Ltd. and others |
If the pre-emption provision was intended to protect the existing shareholders against the introduction of an outsider, a shareholder intending to exercise that right would reasonably be expected to assert it when the proposed transfer came to his or her knowledge. Yet, even after the Petitioner expressly sought rectification by her letters dated 21.01.2016 and 09.02.2016, no shareholder came forward either to purchase the shares or to object on the ground that he or she intended to exercise the right of pre-emption. Nor has any competing claim been asserted throughout the prolonged pendency of the present proceeding. In these circumstances, the Court is not persuaded that the pre-emption clause can now be invoked merely as a technical objection to the Petitioner`s claim when the very persons for whose benefit the provision was incorporated have, with full knowledge of the transaction and the Petitioner`s claim, neither exercised nor asserted the right for many years. Their prolonged and conscious inaction, in the circumstances of the present case, amounts to waiver or acquiescence in the transfer and substantially undermines the Respondents` reliance upon the pre-emption provision. |
|
44 |
Criminal Revision 2571/2025
(Criminal Revision 2571/2025)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 25-AUG-26
|
Md. Kobir Uddin Biswas vs The State and another |
s. 138A NI Act has overriding effect over s. 246(2A) of the Cr.PC. |
|
45 |
Writ Petition 563/2025
(Writ Petition 563/2025)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 25-AUG-26
|
Bengal Aitken Spence Travels Limited-Vs-Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Civil Aviation and Tourism |
Absolute in part with direction |
|
46 |
Writ Petition 4920/2025
(Writ Petition 4920/2025)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 25-AUG-26
|
Md. Eftekharul Islam-Vs-The Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Disaster Management and Relief and others |
Absolute with direction |
|
47 |
Writ Petition 13988/2023
(Writ Petition 13988/2023)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 25-AUG-26
|
Md. Mostofa Jaman Sheikh and others-Vs-Government of Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Youth and Sports and others |
Absolute with direction |
|
48 |
First Appeal 178/2009
(First Appeal 178/2009)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 25-AUG-26
|
Janata Bank Ltd Vs. M/S Hoque Commercial Syndicate and others |
Allowed |
|
49 |
Writ Petition 11839/2017
(WP_11839_2017)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 25-AUG-26
|
Md. Asaduzzaman vs The Government of Bangladesh |
Discharged |
|
50 |
Civil Revision 2022/2016
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 25-AUG-26
|
Md. Nure Alam Vs. Md. Mamun and others |
.. |
