Home : Supreme Court of Bangladesh

1

Criminal Appeal(H) (TN) 831/1999
(Criminal Appeal)

অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 21-JUN-26

Md. Enayet Karim -Vs- The State and Anti-corruption Commission, Dhaka

Allowed

2

Writ Petition 2144/2026
(Writ Petition 2144/2026)

অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 21-JUN-26

Parvin Akter, Proprietor of Monnoo Corporation and others-Vs-The Government of Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Agriculture and others

Absolute

3

Criminal Revision (TN) 3339/2023
(Criminal Revision No. 3339/2023)

অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 18-JUN-26

Sayem Ahmod ...Convict-Petitioner. -Versus- Islami Bank Bangladesh Limited and another ............... Opposite Parties.

The Rule is discharged

4

First Misc Appeal 70/2011
(First Misc Appeal 70/2011)

অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 17-JUN-26

Faruque Ahmed and others Vs. Noor Ahmed and others

Appeal is disposed of.

5

First Misc Appeal 294/2023
(First Misc Appeal 294/2023)

অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 17-JUN-26

Chandra Banu and others Vs. Khurshid Nayem and others

Appeal is dismissed

6

Criminal Revision (TN) 4450/2025
(Criminal Revision No. 4450/2025)

অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 17-JUN-26

Md. Robiul Islam ...Convict-Petitioner. -Versus- The State and another ...Complainant-Opposite Parties.

The Rule is made absolute

7

First Appeal (TN) 1182/2026
(First Appeal (TN) 1182/2026)

অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on :

Country General Manager, National Bank of Pakistan, Gulshan, Dhaka and -Versus- Md. Anowar Hossain

.

8

First Appeal 113/2007
(.../)

অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 17-JUN-26

Md. Shajahan Ali Khan Vs. Rupali Bank and others

The alleged arbitration is stated to have taken place in 1996, when the Arbitration Act, 1940 was in force. Under the scheme of the Arbitration Act, 1940, as under the Arbitration Act, 2001, the existence of a valid arbitration agreement is the sine qua non for commencement of any arbitration proceeding. It is a settled principle of law that no arbitration can lawfully be initiated, conducted, or enforced in the absence of a valid and binding arbitration agreement between the parties.

In this regard, section 161 of the Contract Act, 1872 is directly relevant, which provides that if, by the default of the bailee, the goods are not returned, delivered or tendered at the proper time, he is responsible to the bailor for any loss, destruction or deterioration of the goods from that time.

Therefore, under Sections 161 and 73 of the Contract Act, compensation for the wrongful retention or non-return of goods or share certificates should be determined by reference to their value on the due-return date, together with lawful interest, rather than by reference to any subsequent increase in market value. If no trading took place on that date, the assessment shall be based on the average market value on the nearest trading date thereto. To hold otherwise would expose the defaulting bailee to liability arising from market fluctuations wholly unconnected with the breach itself.

9

First Appeal 321/2014
(.../)

অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 17-JUN-26

Md. Shafiqul Islam vs. Abdus Sobhan and others

The foregoing views of the various Apex Courts clearly indicate that an admission made by a party in a pleading may be treated as evidence against that party in another suit, not only in relation to a different subject matter but also against a different opponent. However, such an admission cannot be regarded as conclusive proof, and it remains open to the party concerned to establish that it is untrue. An admission, therefore, constitutes substantive evidence, subject to rebuttal by its maker. Where the maker fails to rebut its presumptive value, the opposing party is entitled to rely upon and derive benefit from it, irrespective of whether the admission appears in a plaint or a written statement. However, if it is established that the plaint or written statement containing the admission is a forged document, the admission contained therein cannot be used against the party concerned.

The decision cited above clearly establishes that where a plaintiff is not a party to a decree or instrument relating to a property, a suit for a simple declaration of title to that property, without seeking any relief against such decree or instrument, is maintainable. In other words, where a plaintiff seeks only a declaration of title and is not a party to the deed or decree concerning the property in question, he is not required to seek cancellation of the deed or decree. Consequently, a suit for a simple declaration of title is maintainable without any such consequential relief.

10

Writ Petition 3218/2025
(Writ Petition 3218/2025)

অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 17-JUN-26

Eastern Bank PLC … Petitioner -VersusThe Judge, Artha Rin Adalat, Chattogram and others . … Respondents

Discharged

11

Admiralty Suit 30/2025

অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 17-JUN-26

BanBridge navigation, DMCC UAE Versus M.V. MAJESTIC VERA and others.

Allowed in different form

12

Writ Petition 13300/2016
(Writ Petition 13300/2016)

অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 17-JUN-26

Ibrahim Alam Bhuiyan and others Vs. Govt of Bangladesh and others

Challenge the paripatra regarding clarification of higher grade in the National Pay Scale, 2015

13

Writ Petition 4008/2019
(Writ Petition 4008/2019)

অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 16-JUN-26

Mohammad Ullah Mintu and another-vs-Commissioner of Customs, Customs House, Chattogram and others

Absolute

14

Writ Petition 4007/2019
(Writ Petition 4007/2019)

অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 16-JUN-26

Mohammad Ullah Mintu and another-vs-Commissioner of Customs, Customs House, Chattogram and others

Absolute

15

Writ Petition 4006/2019
(Writ Petition 4006/2019)

অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 16-JUN-26

Mohammad Ullah Mintu and another-vs-Commissioner of Customs, Customs House, Chattogram and others

Absolute

16

Criminal Revision 4812/2024
(Criminal Revision 4812/2024)

অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 16-JUN-26

Md. Rakib Hossain Pias vs. The State and another

Compromise in Section 138 cases of NI Act.

17

Criminal Revision 2622/2023

অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 16-JUN-26

Babul Mia and another -Vs- The State and another

The alleged omission of impleading the company in the proceeding is an irregularity and the same is not fatal and that though the company is not made a party in the proceeding, but the persons concerned, representing the company, who are party in the issuance of the dishonored cheque in reference, having been made party in the proceeding, the proceeding cannot be said to be bad for defect of party inasmuch as the punishment if any on proof, is to be inflicted upon the natural persons involved in the offence committed.

18

Writ Petition 5583/2023
(Writ Petition 5583/2023)

অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 16-JUN-26

Sonali Dredger Limited-vs-National Board of Revenue, Represented by its Chairman, NBR Bhaban, Rajaswa Bhaban, Plot No. F1/A, Agargaon, Sher-E-Bangla Nagar, Dhaka-1207 and others

Absolute

19

Writ Petition 10279/2025
(Writ Petition 10279/2025)

অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 16-JUN-26

Commissioner of Customs, Customs House, Chattogram-vs-Customs, Excise and VAT Appellate Tribunal and another

Discharged

20

Customs Appeal 39/2010
(Customs Appeal 39/2010)

অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 16-JUN-26

BSI Inspectorate Limited-vs-Customs, Excise and VAT Appellate Tribunal and others

Allowed

21

Writ Petition 5321/2016
(Writ Petition 5321/2016)

অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 16-JUN-26

Petromax Refinery Limited-vs-National Board of Revenue, represented by its Chairman and others

Rule Absolute

22

VAT Appeal 42/2010
(VAT Appeal 42/2010)

অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 16-JUN-26

Md. Amir Hossain-vs-Customs, Excise and VAT Appellate Tribunal and others

Rule Allowed

23

Customs Appeal 125/2020
(Customs Appeal 125/2020)

অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 16-JUN-26

Hakkani Motors Ltd.-vs-Customs, Excise and VAT Appellate Tribunal and others

Dismissed

24

Writ Petition 13514/2016
(Writ Petition 13514/2016)

অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 16-JUN-26

Nur Afzal Begum-vs-National Board of Revenue and others

Discharged

25

Writ Petition 3188/2026
(Writ Petition 3188/2026)

অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 16-JUN-26

Golden Son Limited-vs-National Board of Revenue and others

Disposed of

26

Writ Petition 15946/2023
(Writ Petition 15946/2023)

অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 16-JUN-26

Rainbow Ice Represented by it’s proprietor, Zamir Uddin Ahmed Chaudhury Rony-vs-The Commissioner of Customs, Customs House, Chattogram and others

Disposed of

27

Criminal Revision 1126/2007
(Criminal Revision 1126/2007)

অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 16-JUN-26

Abdul Khaleque -vs- The state

Disposed of with modification

28

VAT Appeal 37/2011
(VAT Appeal 37/2011)

অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 15-JUN-26

Unilever Bangladesh Limited-vs-Customs, Excise and VAT Appellate Tribunal, Dhaka and others

Rule allowed

29

VAT Appeal 65/2015
(VAT Appeal 65 of 2015 with 66 of 2015 and 67 of 2015)

অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 15-JUN-26

Shurwid Industries Ltd-vs-Customs, Excise and VAT Appellate Tribunal and others

Dismissed

30

Writ Petition 16417/2024
(Writ Petition 16417/2024)

অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 15-JUN-26

M/S Zeil Wears Limited-vs-Chairman, National Board of Revenue and others

Discharged

31

First Misc Appeal 75/2026
(.../)

অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 15-JUN-26

Md. Harisur Rahman (Masum) Vs. Fahima Rahman and another

It is a settled principle that Order XL of the Code of Civil Procedure confers wide discretionary power upon the Court to appoint a Receiver where it appears just, proper, and convenient and in a partition suit, where a co-sharer entitled to a substantial share is kept out of possession and deprived of benefits, appointment of a Receiver is justified even without proof of waste.

32

Writ Petition 3545/2026
(Writ Petition 3545/2026)

অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 15-JUN-26

Md. Shahidul Islam-vs-Government of Bangladesh represented by the Secretary Ministry of Finance, Secretariat Building Ramna, Dhaka and others

Rule Disposed of

33

Writ Petition 3000/2012
(Writ Petition 3000/2012)

অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 15-JUN-26

Joarder Nowsher Ali-vs-Commissioner of Customs, Customs House P.S.-Bandar, District- Chattogram and others

Discharged

34

Writ Petition 8951/2025
(writ petition 8951/2025)

অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 15-JUN-26

Amirul Islam, Proprietor of Mithu Carpets-vs-The Commissioner of Customs, Customs House (ICD), Kamalapur, Dhaka and others

Rule Disposed of

35

Writ Petition 4583/2024
(4583/2024)

অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 15-JUN-26

Amirul Islam, Proprietor of Mithu Carpets-vs-The Commissioner of Customs, Customs House (ICD), Kamalapur, Dhaka and others

Rule Disposed of

36

Customs Appeal 248/2014
(248/2014)

অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 15-JUN-26

M/s. M.R. Trading Corporation, Chattogram-vs-Commissioner of Customs, Customs House, Chattogram and others

Dismissed

37

First Misc Appeal 45/1999
(First Misc Appeal 45/1999)

অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 15-JUN-26

Sirajul Haque Chowdhury Vs. Government of Bangladesh

Disposed of

38

First Misc Appeal 21/2002
(First Misc Appeal 21/2002)

অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 15-JUN-26

Pubali Bank Limited Vs. National Bank Limited and others

Dismissed

39

First Misc Appeal 245/1998
(First Misc Appeal 245/1998)

অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 15-JUN-26

Ahmed Shakil Choudhury and another Vs. Nosir Ahmed being dead his heirs-Hamida Khatun and others

Dismissed

40

First Misc Appeal 94/2011
(First Misc Appeal 94/2011)

অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 15-JUN-26

Haji Mahabubul Hoq and others Vs. Arfa Khatun and others

Dismissed

41

First Misc Appeal 194/1996
(First Misc Appeal 194/1996)

অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 15-JUN-26

Serajul Haque Vs. Anowar Hossain and others

Dismissed

42

Criminal Revision 409/2007

অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 15-JUN-26

Masuk Miah -Vs- The State and another

the demand for simply money by the husband from his wife does not constitute any offense under the provisions so enumerated in section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act. The amount allegedly demanded does not satisfy the definition of dowry as under the Act. the allegation of simple torture does not constitute any offense punishable under section 323 of the Penal Code.

43

Criminal Revision 3010/2022

অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 15-JUN-26

Md. Sajib Miah -Vs- The State and another

“The High Court, while hearing revision, does not work as an appellate court and will not re-appreciate the evidence, unless some glaring mistake is pointed out to show that injustice has been done”. “Revisional jurisdiction is normally to be exercised only in exceptional cases where there is a glaring defect in the procedure, or there is a manifest error on a point of law resulting in miscarriage of justice”. “While exercising the revisional power, the High Court has no authority to re-appreciate the evidence in the manner as the trial court and appellate courts are required to do”.

44

Civil Revision 1623/2012
(Civil Revision 1623/2012)

অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 14-JUN-26

Mohammad Mohsin being dead his heirs Asma Begum and others ... Plaintiff-Petitioners Versus Rezaul Karim and others ... Defendant-Opposite parties

Discharged

45

First Misc Appeal 244/2000
(First Misc Appeal 244/2000)

অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 14-JUN-26

Hilly Housing Co-operative Society Ltd ... Defendant-Appellant -Versus- Akhtaruzzaman Chowdhury and another ... Plaintiff-Respondents

Disposed of

46

Civil Rule 602/2024
(Civil Rule 602/2024)

অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 14-JUN-26

Md. Sadequl Islam ... Defendant-Petitioner Versus Md. Tariqul Islam and others ... Plaintiff-Opposite parties

Absolute

47

Criminal Revision 1291/2007
(Criminal Revision 1291/2007)

অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 14-JUN-26

Joynal Sk. and another -vs- The State, represented by the Deputy Commissioner, Faridpur

Discharged

48

Criminal Revision 130/2007
(Criminal Revision 130/2007)

অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 14-JUN-26

Lokman Hossain Sheikh -vs- The State

Discharged

49

Criminal Revision 1263/2007
(Criminal Revision 1263/2007)

অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 14-JUN-26

Md. Salauddin Sardar -vs- The State and another

Made absolute

50

Writ Petition 9720/2020
(Writ Petition 9720/2020)

অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 14-JUN-26

Md. Shirajul Hoque, Head Master (acting) of Mahigonj High School, son of late Yousuf Ali Miah, Village-Bagdokra, Police Station-Domar, District-Nilphamari versus Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Education, Bangladesh Secretariat, Dhaka-1000, and others

Absolute in part