Judgment : High Court Division Full List
 
Case Type
Case/Tender Number
Year
Parties
Short Description
 

Case Number Parties Short Description
1
Md. Rafiqul Islam Sheikh and others. -Versus- Ashutosh Karmaker and others
Absolute
2
Md. Faysal Hossain, -Versus- Mst. Momtaz Akhter Keya,
Discharged
3
Bangladesh, represented by the Deputy Commissioner, Nawabgonj. -Versus- Md. Afzal Hossain and others.
Absolute
4
Md. Abul Hossain and another. -Versus- Deputy Commissioner, Sylhet and others.
Discharged.
5
Md. A. Rahim and others. vs. Md. Abdul Kuddus and others.
Discharged
6
Government of Bangladesh and others VS. Bankim Behari Halder and others
7
Abdur Rab Vs. Government of Bangladesh
8
Md. Masum Rana and others Vs. Begum Hosnera Ahammad and others
9
Respondent No.1 Abdul Sobhan being dead his heirs- Moidharer Nessa @ Madhu Bibi and others Vs. Appellant NO.1 Mir Hossen being dead his hier- Hazera Begum and others
10
Md. Munser Ali being dead his heirs- Most. Rabia Begum and others Vs. Md. Mohsin Ali being dead his heirs- Md. Lehaj Uddin and others
11
Md. A. Rahim and others. vs. Md. Abdul Kuddus and others
Discharged
12
Kazi Safayet Hossain and others vs. Sheikh Zulfiker Rahan
Discharged
13
Government of the People`s Republic of Bangladesh Vs. Lutfe Habib and others
14
Mainul Ehsan Mahir VS Bangladesh and another
15
Abdus Samad and others-Vs-Jarina Khatoon being dead her legal heirs; 1(a) Mohammad Farid and others
Discharged with costs
16
Md. Fazlul Haque Badsha-Vs-Khulna City Corporation, represented by its Mayor, Nagar Bhaban, Khulna and others
Discharged
17
Umme Kulsum and others vs. A. Samad and others
Absolute
18
Biplop Kanti Das and others Vs Government of Bangladesh and others
Dispose of
19
Badrul Ahsan Chwdhury vs. Fojunnessa @ Joyjunnessa Awal and others
Discharged
20
Nur Nahar and another vs. Abu Sobhan Sikder (Minir) and others
Discharged
21
Online Properties Ltd … Petitioners -VersusBangladesh Bank represented by its Governor, head Office, Bangladesh Bank Bhaban, Police Station: Motijheel, District: Dhaka and others. … Respondents
The rule is discharged
22
Md. Masudar Rahman Mithu and another-Vs-Khondoker Kamruzzaman and others
Disposed of
23
Md. Afsar Ali Pramanik-Vs-Md. Amirul Islam and others
Discharged
24
Md. Ibrahim Khan and others-Vs-Farzana Begum alias Farzana Kashem and others
Discharged with costs of Tk.10,000/-
25
Multiplan Limited. -Versus- Monjoor-E-Matin and others.
Discharged
26
Mohammad Ullah and another. -Versus- Dulal Chandro Biswas and another.
Discharged.
27
Mrs. Lily Begum Ahmed and another. -Versus- Navana Real Estate Ltd. and others
Absolute
28
Md. Imran Vs. Manjur Morshed and others
29
Md. Abdul Kayum and others Vs. Mojibur Rahman and others
30
Md. Zahangir Alam and others Vs. Ziaul Haque and others
31
Md. Suruj Miah, son of late Haji Afizuddin Prodhan, Proprietor of M/S Madanpur Enterprise, 2/1, Nawab Street, Wari, Police Station- Sutrapur, Dhaka.-Vs-Bangladesh Bank, Head Office, Bangladesh Bank Bhaban, Motijheel Commercial Area, Dhaka represented by its Governor and others.
Discharged
32
Shamala Khatoon vs Karim Ali and others
Absolute
33
Suruj Miah Jute Spinning Mills Ltd. represented by its Managing Director Md. Suruj Miah, having its place of business at Sena Kallyan Bhaban (16th Floor), Suite No. 1603, 1604, 195, Motijheel Commercial Area, Dhaka-1000 and another.-Vs-Bangladesh Bank, Head Office, Bangladesh Bank Bhaban, Motijheel Commercial Area, Dhaka represented by its Governor and others.
Discharged
34
Md. Adnan Ahmed -Versus- The State and another
35
Md. Abdus Salam. -Versus- S.M. Sohrab Uddin is being dead his legal heirs: 1(ka) Dr. Sayma Sultana Smrity and others.
Discharged
36
Md. Minhazul Huq Shah, son of Nazmul Huq Shah and mother’s name- Most Moksuda Begum, Assistant Teacher (Social Science) Porsha High Madrasah cum High School, Police Station- Porsha, District- Naogaon.-Vs-Secretary, Ministry of Education Bangladesh Secretariat, Dhaka-1000 and others.
Absolute
37
Alif Casual Wear Ltd. -Versus- Changzhou Hengwangjia Textile Co. Ltd. and others.
Discharged.
38
M/S. Wills Sports Wear Ltd. vs. Trading Corporation of Bangladesh, Principal Office, T.C.B. Bhaban, Karwan Bazar, Dhaka, and others
Allowed
39
Md. Tarik Ullah vs. BRAC Bank Limited, Head Office 1, Gulshan Avenue, Gulshan, Dhaka-1212, and others
Discharged
40
41
Md. Ayub Ali Kha and others vs Md. Moslem Uddin Molla being died his legal heirs Most. Julekha Bibi and others
Disposed of
42
Md. Alamgir Hawlader and others vs. Md. Ibrahim Hawkader and others
dismissed
43
Mr. Muztaba Newaz Md. Zavid Vs. Sayeda Kanij Kamruj Jahan.
Discharghed
44
Md. Jasim Uddin Vs. Sumiya Akter
Discharged
45
Krishna Pada Bawali being dead his legal heirs: 1(a) Shadhan Bawali and others. -Versus- People’s Republic of Bangladesh and others.
Discharged.
46
Md. Sohrab Hossain … Petitioner -VersusThe Government of Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources and others. … Respondents
The Rule is made absolute
47
Md. Abul Hashem Chowdhury … Petitioner -VersusThe Government of Bangladesh, represented by its Secretary, the Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources and others. … Respondents
The Rule is made absolute
48
Samir Chandra Sajwal being dead his legal heirs 1. Sudhir Chandra Sawjal and others.-Vs-The Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh represented by the Deputy Commissioner, Barishal and others.
Absolute
49
Mohammad Nurul Alam Chowdhury alias Ukil and another -Vs- Sree Shibu Prashad Dutta and others
Sub-section 3 of Section 96 of the State Acquisition and Tenancy Act stipulates that an application for preemption must be accompanied by a deposit of the entire consideration money of the property transferred, as stated in the notice under Section 89, together with compensation at the rate of 10% thereof. The statutory deposit being a condition precedent to the application being entertained, its non-compliance renders the application liable to be dismissed. The appellate court below failed to consider that the State Acquisition and Tenancy Act,1950, is a special law wherein the statutory provision for deposition of consideration money with compensation for filing a case for preemption under the Act is provided as a condition precedent with consequence.
50
Md. Mostafa Sheikh and another. -Versus- Md. Awal Kabir and others.
Disposed of.
This Site is Visited :