: High Court Division Full List
 
Case Type
Case/Tender Number
Year
Parties
Short Description
 

Case Number Parties Short Description
1
Transcom Beverage Limited, represented by its Managing Director. -Versus- TFG International S.r.l., represented by its President Mr. Daniele Pezzani, of Via Cavallotti, 21- 31015 Conegliano (TV) - Italy and others
Disposed of.
2
Md. Saiful Islam. -Vs - Safina Park Ltd. and others.
Disposed of.
3
Md. Jakirul Kayes @ Soeb -vs- The State
PW. 12 is the doctor who examined the victim and issued the injury certificate. This witness, in cross-examination, admitted that he did not mention the patient’s identifier name or registration number in the injury report. Moreover, this witness also admitted that he wrote in the report that the victim was admitted to a ‘‘Male Ward’’ in the hospital. Further, he admitted that the victim’s health condition was not necessary for hospital admission. In view of the above facts and circumstances, we are of the firm view that the injury report issued by the doctor, PW.12, has lost its credibility/authenticity and has no evidential value under Section 45 of the Evidence Act. Notably, a doctor must strictly observe the rules of medical ethics and jurisprudence, as well as have regard to the law of the country, in discharging professional duties. Since the prosecution has failed to prove that the victim received treatment at a hospital specified in the Ain, the charge under section 11(ga) of the Ain against the appellant is barred by the proviso so enumerated in section 32 of the Nari-O-Shisho Nirjatan Daman Ain, 2000.
4
if the cheque is found to have been issued by the drawer and it was dishonored in that event, there has been no scope for the drawer of the cheque to exonerate himself in committing the offense punishable under section 138(1) of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
5
Md. Iqbal Kabir-Vs-The Government of Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary Ministry of Education and others
Absolute
6
Md. Anisur Rahman @ Anis and others Vs. The State
Material contradictions in the prosecution case and application of Section 332 of the Penal Code.
7
Latiful Huda -Vs- The State and another.
Discharged
8
Siraj Mia ... Convict-Appellant-Petitioner -Versus- The State, represented by the Deputy Commissioner, Sylhet ... Respondent-Opposite Party
The Rule is discharged
9
Md. Masum Hossain ... Convict-Petitioner -Versus- The State and another ...Complainant-Opposite Parties
The appeal is dismissed
10
Md. Jamal Uddin ... Convict-Petitioner -Versus- The State and another ...Complainant-Opposite Parties
The Rule is discharged
11
Mawlana Md. Shahab Uddin ... Convict-Petitioner -Versus- The State and another ...Complainant-Opposite Parties
The Rule is discharged
12
Mukti Rani Chakroborti ...Convict-Appellant -Versus- The State and another ...Respondent
The appeal is allowed
13
S.M. Shadat Hossen ... Appellant -Versus- The State and another ... Respondents
The appeal is dismissed
14
Md. Nur Hossain Khan and another VS The Government of Bangladesh and others.
Disposed of with above direction
15
Md. Abul Bashar Molla and others Defendant Nos 29(Ka) to 29 (Cha)-vs- Atabur and others
Absolute
16
Discharged
17
A.B.M. Ashiquzzaman and others-Vs-Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Education and others
Disposed of with direction
18
Md. Sattar Khan being dead his legal heirs- Shahnaz and others Vs. Arafat Mahmud
...
19
Md. Atiqullah Sowdagar and others -Versus- Abdul Ghani being dead substituted by his legal heirs and heiresses Jakia Begum and others
------
20
Md. Anowar Hossain and another VS. House Building Finance Corporation, Zonal Office, Rajshahi and another
First Appeal
21
Md. Jahangir Hossain ... Convict-Petitioner -Versus- Mst. Naznin Sultana and another ...Complainant-Opposite parties.
The Rule is discharged
22
Md. Munsur Ali Pramanik Vs. Most. Rezia Begum and others
Discharged
23
Dr. Shaheda Begum ... Convict-Appellant -Versus- The State and another ...Complainant-Respondents
The Appeal is disposed of
24
Abdul Jalil ... Convict-Petitioner -Versus- The State and another ...Complainant-Opposite Parties
The Rule is discharged
25
Md. Fazlur Rahman … Petitioner -VersusBangladesh Bank and others … Respondents
Absolute
26
Nurul Azim Sohel … Petitioner -Versus- Judge, Artha Rin Adalat No. 1, Dhaka and another … Respondents
Discharged
27
Josimuddin and others Vs. Idris Ali and others
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
Most. Masuda Akhter @ Mina Begum being dead his heirs- Md. Rabbi Islam (Joni) and others Vs. Md. Masuduzzaman Milon and others
42
Nurunnahar Chowdhury and others Vs. dipak Banik and others
43
Md. Hamidur Rahman -Vs- The State and Anti-Corruption Commission
the entrustment of money by a person to the Post Master for opening a new Savings Bank Account would amount to `entrustment` within the meaning of Section 409, Indian Penal Code. "In the case of an offense by a public servant punishable under Section 409 IPC, the acquisition of dominion or control over the property must also be in the capacity of a public servant.....The gravamen of the offence is the dishonest misappropriation of the money or property which comes into the possession or under the control of a public servant who has the ostensible authority to receive it even though, technically speaking, from the point of view of the distribution of departmental duties under internal rules of an office, it may not be within the scope of his authority or duty to accept the money." (Para 12) "The fact that a public servant acts fraudulently in the exercise of his duties as a public servant to get dominion or control over some property will be an aggravating and not an exculpating circumstance. The `entrustment` results from what the person handing over money or property is made to think, understand, and believe about the purpose for which he hands over money or property to a public servant. If this takes place because of and due to the exercise of the official authority, the requirements of Section 409 IPC are satisfied." (Para 12) If the prosecution has discharged its burden of proving the Commission of the crime by the accused beyond any reasonable doubt, it may not be necessary to go into whether the accused has succeeded in proving the defense of alibi. "The actual manner of misappropriation, it is well settled, is not required to be proved by the prosecution. Once entrustment is proved as to how the property entrusted to him was dealt with in view of section 405 of the IPC. If the respondent had failed to produce any material for this purpose, the prosecution should not suffer therefor." the failure of the trial in not mentioning the particulars which are required to be mentioned under sections 221 and 222 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, while framing the charge, caused prejudice to the accused, and because this omission deprived him from taking a proper defense, and as such, the error in the charge definitely occasioned failure of justice. But there will be no prejudice or failure of justice where there was an error in the charge, and the Accused was aware of the error. "The defect in framing of the charges must be so serious that it cannot be covered under Sections 464/465 Code of Criminal Procedure, which
44
Naushad Imtiaz Vs. Sultana Nilufar Banu and others
Discharged
45
Abu Sufiyan Talukder Defendant No.6-appellant-petitioner Versus 1.Selina Monir and others Plaintiff-respondent-opposite party 2.Abul Kalam Azad and others Defendant-respondent-opposite parties Mr. Md. Serajul Haque, Advocate with Mr. Mohammad Abdulla Al Masud, Advocate Mr.Shibli Nomani, Advocate for the petitioners Mr. Jamir Uddin Sircar Senior Advocate with Mr. Kazi Raman (Manik), Advocate for the opposite party No.1
46
G. M. Salam Mia and aother Vs. Md. A. Gaffar and others
47
Partho Khaskel ...Convict- Petitioner. -Versus- The State and another ............... Opposite Parties.
The Rule is discharged
48
Mohammad Ali vs the state and another
49
Md. Sirajul Islam, son of late Haji Abdul Karim, of House-27, Nanda Kumar Dutta Road, Post Office: Posta, Police Station: Lalbagh, Dhaka-1211 and another.-Vs-National Board of Revenue represented by its Chairman, Rajashwa Bhaban, Plot- F1/A, Agargaon, Sher-E-Bangla Nagar, Dhaka-1207 and others
Absolute
50
Md. Shahjahan alias Md. Shahjahan Ali-Vs-Government of Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Public Administration and others
Discharged
This Site is Visited :