Judgment : High Court Division Full List
 
Case Type
Case/Tender Number
Year
Parties
Short Description
 

Case Number Parties Short Description
1
Bilkis Begum vs. The state
Discharged
2
Hefajatur Rahman Vs. The state
Discharged
3
Mohammad Alauddin and others vs. The state
Discharged
4
Md. Hasan Chowdhury @ alias Sohel Vs. The state
Discharged
5
Md. Gazi Abdul Khaleque vs. The state
Discharged
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Md. Badiuzzaman Prang (Boida) -Versus- The State and another
13
Sheikh Abdur Rouf Vs. Md. Abul Hossain and another
Now the question is no longer a res integra. As per provision of section 21A(b) of the Specific Relief Act no contract for sale of any immovable property can be specifically enforced unless the balance amount of consideration of the contract is deposited in the Court at the time of filing the suit for specific performance of the contract. In other words, Failure of depositing the balance amount of the consideration money by the plaintiff at the time of filing the suit for specific performance of the contract for sale of immovable property it cannot be specifically enforced in view of the provisions under section 21A(b) of the Specific Relief Act, 1877 and such suit cannot be maintained.
14
15
The State. -Versus- Md. Atiar Rahman (absconding).
Rejected
16
Bank Asia PLC, Principal Office Branch, Dhaka situated at 111-113, Motijheel C/A, Dhaka-1000, Bangladesh.-Vs-The Court of Artha Rin Adalat, Court No. 02, Dhaka and others.
Discharged
17
Md. Harun_or-Rashid Vs. The Government of Bangladesh and others
Rule is made absolute.
18
Md. Anwar Hossain and others Vs. Government of Bangladesh
Rule is made absolute.
19
The State-Vs.-Md. Bachchu Hawlader
The death reference is rejected and the case is sent back on remand to the trial Court for re-trial.
20
Md. Abdul Khalek Vs. Government of Bangladesh and others
Rule is made absolute.
21
The State-Vs.-Abdul Aziz
Accepted
22
The State-Vs.-Md. Hanif Shikder
Rejected with modification
23
Md. Zahirul Islam and another Vs. Md. Afaz Uddin and others
24
Md. Selimuzzaman Bhuiyan and others-Vs-Government of the People‟s Republic of Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Secondary and Higher Secondary Education Division, Ministry of Education, Bangladesh Secretariat, Ramna, Dhaka and others.
Petitioner Nos.1-3 Rule is discharged and petitioner Nos.4-6 Rule is disposed of
25
Md. Khokon @ Mohammad Hossain and others, all are sons of late Md. Ibrahim of 24/2 Mukim Katara, Police Station- Lalbag, District- Dhaka.-Vs-The learned Judge, Artha Rin Adalat No. 4, Dhaka and others.
Absolute
26
Md. Abdus Salam and others -Vs- The state
Absolute
27
Md. Anowar Hossain -Vs- The State
Absolute
28
Md. Zahir Uddin Arif -vs- The state
Discharged
29
Md. Zahir Uddin Arif -Vs- The State
Discharged
30
Md. Zahir Uddin Arif vs. The state and another
Discharged
31
The State-vs-Md. Jafor and another
32
Tanvir Hasan
vs
The Government of Bangladesh and others.
33
Md. Shah Alam
vs
The Government of Bangladesh, and others.
34
Nazmunnahar Islam
vs
The Government of the Peope’s Republic of Bangladesh and others.
35
Jebun Nahar Yesmin Kana
vs
The Secretary Ministry of Housing and Public Works, Bangladesh Secretariat, Ramna, Dhaka and others.
36
Mohammad Rashed Ali Vs. M.V.AGIA FEVRONIA and others.
Application for reduction of security amount is allowed.
37
Md. Mahatab Uddin being dead his legal heirs Most. Mahfuza Begum and others vs. Executive Engineer and others
discharged
38
Bangladesh Jubo Arthanitibid Forum, a philanthropic organisation vs. The Government of Bangladesh and others
discharged
39
The Chairman, Rajdhani UnnayanKartipakkha (RAJUK) Vs. Haji Md. Abu Syeedand another
The provisions under section 8 of the Acquisition and Requisition of Immovable Property Ordinance, 1982 clearly stipulates that while making the award the Deputy Commissioner must determine the compensation on matters as mentioned in section 8 of the Ordinance. If any person interested challenges the determination of the compensation made by the Deputy Commissionerunder section 8(1)(a) of the Ordinance,he/she is required to prove that the average value of the properties of similar description and with similar advantages in the vicinity during the 12 months preceding the date of publication of the notice under section 3 was higher than that of determined by the Deputy Commissioner and if such aggrieved party challenges other matters in determining compensation as mentioned in section 8, sub-section (1) clause Nos. (b)-(f) and sub-section (2) of the Ordinance he must prove that while making the award the Deputy Commissioner did not determine the compensation on matters as mentioned in those Clause Nos. (b)-(f) of sub-section (1) and sub-section (2) of section 8.
40
Hajee Haris Ali and others versus The Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh, represented by the Deputy Commissioner, Sunamgonj and others
Dismissed
41
42
43
Rehena Akter ... Convict-Appellant -Versus- The State and another ...Complainant- Respondents.
The appeal is dismissed
44
Island Oil Limited Vs. M.T. MANDALA (IMO No. 95000598) and others.
The plaint of the suit is rejected and the security Bank Guarantee is returned to the defendants.
45
Upazila Nirbahi Officer and President Upazila Sech Committee, Shibgonj, Bogrura.
The Rule is disposed of as being infructuous.
46
State Vs. Md. Iqbal Hossain and Others
This Death Reference is accepted.
47
Md. Nazmul Haque-Vs.- Govt. of Bangladesh and others
Absolute
48
Md. Sheab Uddin (Sobuz)-Vs.- Govt. of Bangladesh and others
Absolute
49
Mrs. Monowara Begum-Vs.- The Government of Bangladesh and others
Disposed of with observations
50
Md. Yonus Babul alias Jang Babul and another ...Convict-Appellants-Petitioners -Versus- The State ...............Respondent-Opposite Party
The appeal is allowed
This Site is Visited :