|
Case Number
|
Parties |
Short Description |
|
1 |
Civil Revision 67/2026
(Civil Revision 67/2026)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 23-APR-26
|
Md. Abdul Quddus Vs. Core-Spum Apparel Ltd. and others |
|
|
2 |
Civil Revision 68/2026
(Civil Revision 68/2026)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 23-APR-26
|
Md. Abdul Quddus Vs. Purbachal Apparel Ltd. and others |
|
|
3 |
Writ Petition 2349/2021
(Writ Petition 2349/2021)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 23-APR-26
|
Hafez Abdul Hannan Molla vs The Government of People’s Republic of Bangladesh and others |
|
|
4 |
Writ Petition 218/2016
(Writ Petition 218/2016)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 23-APR-26
|
Md. Abduz Jaker vs Bangladesh represented by Secretary, Ministry of Law, Justice and Parliamentary Affairs, Bangladesh Secretariat, Dhaka and another. |
|
|
5 |
Writ Petition 7378/2022
(Writ Petition 7378/2022)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 23-APR-26
|
Md. Ansar Ahmed vs The Government of Bangladesh and others |
|
|
6 |
Writ Petition 14313/2024
(Writ Petition 14313/2024)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 23-APR-26
|
Md. Abul Kalam vs Government of the Republic of Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Finance, Bangladesh Secretariat, Dhaka and others. |
|
|
7 |
Criminal Revision 162/2007
(Criminal Revision 162/2007)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 23-APR-26
|
Md. Sahidur Rahman and others -Versus- The State |
|
|
8 |
Writ Petition 15258/2024
(Writ Petition 15258/2024)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 23-APR-26
|
Mr. Shiplu Ahsan vs The Judge, Artha Rin Adalat, Court No.3, Dhaka and another. |
|
|
9 |
Writ Petition 9288/2025
(Writ Petition 9288/2025)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 23-APR-26
|
Md. Aman Ullah vs The Governor, Bangladesh Bank and others |
|
|
10 |
Civil Revision 3914/2014
(Civil Revision No. 3914/2014 with Civil Revision No. 3915/2014)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 23-APR-26
|
Mujibur Rahman Chowdhury ... Defendant-Respondent-Petitioner. -Versus- Dulal Ahmed and others ... Plaintiffs-Appellants-Opposite parties. |
The Rule in Civil Revision No. 3914 of 2014 is made absolute. The Rule in Civil Revision No. 3915 of 2014 is discharged. |
|
11 |
Civil Revision 3559/2025
(Civil Revision 3559/2025)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 23-APR-26
|
Mst. Zamena Khatun and others ... Opponent-Petitioners -Versus- Umme Kulsum and others ... Applicant-Opposite Parties |
Discharged |
|
12 |
First Appeal 209/1998
(First Appeal 209/1998)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 22-APR-26
|
Md. Abul Hossain and others versus Md. Khoda Baksh Hazra and others |
First Appeal No. 209 of 1998 is dismissed, First Appeal No. 287 of 1999 is allowed and First Appeal No. 59 of 2025 is dismissed for non prosecution |
|
13 |
First Appeal 285/1995
(First Appeal 285/1995)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 22-APR-26
|
Appellant Nos. 1 and 2, Md. Abdul Hakim Miah and Mosammat Belayetonnessa being dead their legal hires: 2(a) Md. Al-Mamoon and others versus Respondent No. 1, Abdul Goffer Miah, being dead, his legal heirs: 1(a) Most. Zaida Begum and others |
Allowed |
|
14 |
First Misc Appeal 191/1997
(First Misc Appeal 191/1997)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 22-APR-26
|
Ahsanul Haque Tota Vs. Sushil Sana and others |
Appeal is dismissed. |
|
15 |
Writ Petition 7426/2020
(Writ Petition 7426/2020)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 22-APR-26
|
Md. Haider Ali Molla @ Haider Ali Molla Vs. Government of Bangladesh and others |
Rule is made absolute. |
|
16 |
Writ Petition 6951/2022
(Writ Petition 6951/2022)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 22-APR-26
|
Tapan Kanti Dey Vs Government of Bangladesh and others |
Rule is discharged. |
|
17 |
Writ Petition 7220/2023
(Writ Petition 7220/2023)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 22-APR-26
|
Md. Jahangir Hossain and others |
Rule is discharged. |
|
18 |
Writ Petition 1790/2024
(Writ Petition 1790/2024)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 22-APR-26
|
Nur Alam Khan Vs. Government of Bangladesh and others |
Rule is discharged. |
|
19 |
Writ Petition 8994/2023
(Writ Petition 8994/2023)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 22-APR-26
|
Bir Muktijoddha Sohrab alias Budu Vs. Bangladesh represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Liberation War Affairs and others |
Rule is made absolte |
|
20 |
First Appeal 157/2017
(First Appeal 157/2017)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 22-APR-26
|
Abdul Ali alias Dhayennuddin Vs Deputy Commissioner and others |
Dismissed |
|
21 |
Writ Petition 15214/2024
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 22-APR-26
|
Fokhrul Hasan vs The Administrator, Sylhet City Corporation, Nagar Bhaban, Sylhet-3100 and others |
Disposed of |
|
22 |
Writ Petition 4447/2025
(With Writ Petition 8826/2023)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 22-APR-26
|
Md. Jamal Uddin, General Secretary, Chattogram Bandar Byaboharkari Sramik Karmachari Union vs The Labour Appellate Tribunal and others (In writ petition No. 4447 of 2025 and Chattogram Bandar Byaboharkari Sramik Karmachari League and another vs The Labour Appellate Tribunal and others (In writ petition No. 8826 of 2023) |
|
|
23 |
Criminal Revision 1024/2007
(Criminal Revision 1024/2007)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 21-APR-26
|
Abdul Aziz -Versus- The State |
|
|
24 |
Criminal Revision 1008/2007
(Criminal Revision 1008/2007)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 21-APR-26
|
Md. Moktarul Islam alias Md. Moktarul Is: -Versus- The State |
|
|
25 |
Criminal Revision 1043/2007
(Criminal Revision 1043/2007)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 21-APR-26
|
Abul Hossain and others -Versus- The State |
|
|
26 |
Criminal Revision 1088/2007
(Criminal Revision 1088/2007)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 21-APR-26
|
Haroon or Rashid -Versus- The State |
|
|
27 |
Criminal Revision 967/2007
(Criminal Revision 967/2007)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 21-APR-26
|
Md. Abdul Karim -Versus- The State |
|
|
28 |
Criminal Revision 278/2023
(Criminal Revision 278/2023)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 21-APR-26
|
Mamunur Rashid @ Abdullah Al Mamun -Versus- The State and another |
|
|
29 |
Criminal Revision 2677/2025
(Criminal Revision 2677/2025)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 21-APR-26
|
Md. Kabil Hossain Kazi -Versus- The State and another |
|
|
30 |
Criminal Revision 2349/2019
(Criminal Revision 2349/2019)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 21-APR-26
|
Md. Jashijul Hoque -Versus- The State and another |
|
|
31 |
Criminal Revision 2787/2025
(Criminal Revision 2787/2025)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 21-APR-26
|
Md. Rofiqul Islam -Versus- The State and another |
|
|
32 |
Writ Petition 8602/2007
(Writ Petition 8602/2007)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 21-APR-26
|
Md. Abdul Latif being dead his legal heirs 1(a) Saleha Begum and others Vs. The Government and others |
Absolute |
|
33 |
First Misc Appeal 373/2007
(First Misc Appeal 373/2007)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 21-APR-26
|
Shahera Begum and others Vs. Md. Sekander Hayat alias Abdul Jalil Miah and others |
Dismissed |
|
34 |
First Misc Appeal 193/1997
(First Misc Appeal 193/1997)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 21-APR-26
|
Taslimuddin Ahmed being dead his heirs:- Ferdous Ahmed and others Vs. Md. Habibullah, Manager, Dhaka Nowab Estate, Court of Wards and another |
Dismissed |
|
35 |
First Misc Appeal 216/2002
(First Misc Appeal 216/2002)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 21-APR-26
|
Kutubuddin Miah Vs. Surjiban Chandra Sirker and others |
Dismissed |
|
36 |
First Misc Appeal 328/2008
(First Misc Appeal 328/2008)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 21-APR-26
|
Mahfuzur Rahman Vs. Government of Bangladesh and others |
Dismissed |
|
37 |
First Misc Appeal 268/2000
(First Misc Appeal 268/2000)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 21-APR-26
|
Shamsun Nahar and others Vs. Eastern Housing Ltd. and others |
Dismissed |
|
38 |
First Misc Appeal 140/2000
(First Misc Appeal 140/2000)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 21-APR-26
|
Begum Roqaiya Hossain and others Vs. Ummul Fateh (Khuku Moni) and others |
Dismissed |
|
39 |
VAT Appeal 28/2015
(VAT Appeal 28/2015)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 21-APR-26
|
Airtel Bangladesh Limited -Versus- Customs, Excise and VAT Appellate Tribunal, Dhaka and another |
Appeal dismissed |
|
40 |
First Misc Appeal 144/1999
(First Misc Appeal 144/1999)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 21-APR-26
|
Fanindra Chandra Roy and others Vs. Sree Bhabesh Chandra Roy and others |
Dismissed |
|
41 |
Writ Petition 8214/2024
(Writ Petition 8214/2024 with 8213/2024 with 17296/2025)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 21-APR-26
|
S. Alam Vegetable Oil Limited -Versus- The Commissioner, Customs, Excise |
Rules are dicharged |
|
42 |
Writ Petition 7939/2009
(Writ Petition 7939/2009)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 21-APR-26
|
Buildtrade Engineering -Versus- Customs, Excise and VAT Appellate Tribunal and others |
Absolute-in-part |
|
43 |
Writ Petition 14074/2025
(Writ Petition 14074/2025)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 21-APR-26
|
Sartaaj Steel Mills Limited and others -Versus- Artha Rin Adalat No. 2, Dhaka and others |
Rule Absolute |
|
44 |
Writ Petition 9316/2024
(Writ Petition 9316/2024)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 21-APR-26
|
M/s. Integral Electric Company -Versus- Bangladesh Bank and others |
Rule Discharged |
|
45 |
First Appeal 149/2020
(.../)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 21-APR-26
|
Md. Nur Islam and others ...Appellants. -Versus- Bodu Mia and others ....Respondents. |
Article 95 of the First Schedule of the Limitation Act stipulates the period of limitation of filing a suit to set aside a decree obtained by fraud or for other relief on the ground of fraud and said period is three years which begins to run when the fraud become known to the party wronged. This suit comes under section 39 of the Specific Relief Act. An ex-parte decree can be set aside by filing application under Order IX rule 13 of the Code of Civil Procedure and the limitation for filing such application is 30 days from the date of ex-parte decree or where the summons has not been duly served, 30 days from the date when the defendants came to know about the ex-parte decree.
Moreover, section 10 of the Code enacts a rule of procedure pure and simple and as such a decree passed in contrary to section 10 is not a nullity and cannot be disregarded in another suit as per decision of the case of Jamani Kanta Roy Chowdhury and ors. vs. Aswini Kumar Haldar and ors. reported in 12 DLR 755. |
|
46 |
First Appeal 34/2025
(.../)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 21-APR-26
|
Sree Dipok Ranhjan Kar .....Appellant. -Versus- Sree Babul Ranjan Kar ......Respondent. |
Thus, after considering the question from different angles, we are of the view that the contentions proceeding for grant or refusal of probate or letters of administration is not a suit in substance and the order in the said proceeding is not a decree, as it does not fulfil the ingredients of decree as defined under the Code. There is no requirement in law that an order in a contentious proceeding should be followed by a decree. In that view of the matter, a decree is not required in law, to be filed along with the memorandum of appeal under section 299 of the Succession Act and as such, this appeal cannot be held to be incompetent due to non-filing of a copy of a decree along with the memorandum of appeal.
The provisions of sections 19-C, 19-H and 19-I of the Court Fees Act, 1870 clearly suggest that the court-fees according to the valuation fixed under section 19-H of the Act will be payable at a stage if and when an order entitling the grant of probate or letters of administration would be made and not any previous stage.
The provisions of sections 19-C, 19-H and 19-I of the Court Fees Act, 1870 clearly suggest that the court-fees according to the valuation fixed under section 19-H of the Act will be payable at a stage if and when an order entitling the grant of probate or letters of administration would be made and not any previous stage.
Above citations clearly suggest that if the evidence adduced is not succeeded in removing the legitimate doubt as to the mental capacity of the testator; if the dispositions made in the will appears to be unnatural, improbable or unfair in the light of the relevant circumstances, or, if the will otherwise indicate that the said dispositions is not the result of the testator`s free will and mind, such legitimate suspicions should be completely removed before the document is accepted as the last will of the testator. Moreover, even if the caveator does not raise the question of testamentary capacity i.e the testator had full sense, he was in sound mind and he understood the nature and effect of his action in putting his signature or placing his mark on the document, yet the propounder is not exonerated from the incumbent duty to prove that the testator had sound and disposing mind and that he fully understood the nature and effect of his action in executing the will. Moreover, all legitimate suspicions should be completely removed before the document is accepted as the last will of the testator. |
|
47 |
Criminal Revision 4249/2025
(Criminal Revision 4249/2025)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 21-APR-26
|
Md. Ahsanul Haque vs. The state and another |
Discharged |
|
48 |
Criminal Revision 4242/2025
(Criminal Revision 4242/2025)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 21-APR-26
|
Md. Ahsanul Haque vs. The state and another |
Discharged |
|
49 |
Criminal Revision 4248/2025
(Criminal Revision 4248/2025)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 21-APR-26
|
Md. Ahsanul Haque vs. The state and another |
Discharged |
|
50 |
Criminal Revision 4247/2025
(Criminal Revision 4247/2025)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 21-APR-26
|
Md. Ahsanul Haque vs. The state and another |
Discharged |
