: High Court Division Full List
 
Case Type
Case/Tender Number
Year
Parties
Short Description
 

Case Number Parties Short Description
1
Sirajul Haque Chowdhury Vs. Govt. and others
Disposed of
2
Md. Mojibar Rahman ...Petitioner -Versus- Md. Abul Kashem being dead his heirs Md. Momtazul Islam and others. .…Opposite parties
Discharged
3
Md. Rokanuzzaman … petitioner -Versus- Bangladesh Bank and others. … respondents
Discharged
4
Zia Fertilizerr Company Limited Vs. The Dowla Prokaushal and another
Allowed
5
Amar Kumar Das being died his heirs Lili Rani Das and others Vs. Dr. Monoranjan Mohuri and others
Discharged
6
Syed Abdul Wadud … Plaintiff- Petitioner Versus Khulna City Corporation and others ...... Defendant-Opposite Parties
Absolute
7
Alhaj Mizanur Rahman (Badol) -Versus- Md. Ruhul Amin and others
Discharged
8
Mohammad Moazzam Hossain, Son of late Mvi K.M. Khaleque, of Vill-Kasba, P.S-Gournadi, District-Barishal, represented by his Constituted Attorney: Advocate Rabiul Islam Tarafder (Robin), House No: 08, Road No. 21, Sector: 04, Uttara Model Town, Dhaka. -Versus- Dr. Gias Uddin Miah and others
Dismissed.
9
Mayor, Dhaka North City Corporation and another -Versus- Ferdousi Sabur and others
Absolute
10
Alhaj Md Mukul Amin -Versus- Md. Alamgir and others
Discharged
11
Md. Abdur Razzak Bhuiyan @ Vhian and others -Versus- Abdul Mannan Hawlader and others
Absolute
12
The appeal, therefore, is dismissed and consequently the connecting Rule is disposed of. No order as to costs.
13
Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh, represented by the Deputy Commissioner, Narsingdi-Vs-District Judge, performing the function of Vested Property Restoration Appellate Tribunal, Narsingdi and others
Discharged
14
Abdur Razzak being dead his heirs No. 1(a) Md. Mahmud Hossain and others vs. Matiar Rahman and others
The rule is discharged
15
Kishan Chandra Shaha and others vs Pintu Chandra Das Shuklabaiddha and another
The Rule is discharged
16
Md. Saman Mollah being dead, his legal heirs: 1(a) Md. Siraj Ali Mollah and others -Versus- Md. Abdul Karim
Discharged
17
Peti: 01 being dead, his heirs are as follows: 1(a) Balaram Tarua and others -Versus- Sree Ranjit Kumar Parbat and others
Discharged
18
Mohammad Ali Munshi -Versus- The State and another
Absolute
19
Md. Saidur Rahman Letu Vs. M.V. ASIA ZIRCON II AND OTHERS.
The Rule issued in Admiralty Suit No. 82 of 2017 is discharged.
20
Sharif Shah Kamal and others Vs. RJSC and others.
Allowed.
21
Jannatul Ferdous -Versus- Samina Sabiha (Ria) and others
.
22
Md. Wali Ullah Patowari ...Convict-Petitioner. -Versus- The State and another ... Opposite Parties.
The Rule is disposed of
23
Al-Aksa Islami Multipurpose Co-operative Society Limited and -Versus- Md. Mohiuddin Mollah and others
.
24
Emon Tanchangya and others-vs-The Government of Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Chattogram Hill Tracts Affairs and others
Disposed of with directions
26
Moslem Uddin and others -vs- The State and another
Absolute
27
Syed Ahmed and others -Versus- Samsu Uddin and others
.
28
Rupali Bank Limited -Versus- Md. Foyjur Rahman being dead his heirs and successors- Md. Shoriful Islam and others
.
29
Mohd. Selim Kashai and others -Vs- The State
The principle of circumstantial evidence to prove the guilt of an accused is that all the circumstances must themselves be proved beyond all reasonable doubt and the chain of circumstances should be proved without reasonable doubt.

Abscondance of an accused by itself proves no guilt.
30
Mr. Helal Miah -vs- The State
To convict of an accused under 25B of the Special Powers Act, it has to be fully established that the seized goods are contraband goods and were illegally imported into Bangladesh without payment of customs duties and other taxes. Those are actually recovered from the accused’s possession within Bangladesh territory.

From the discussion of the evidence on record, it appears that the prosecution version suffers from material inconsistencies. It lacks independent corroboration of the alleged recovery and the appellant’s involvement. Thus, on careful consideration of the witnesses discussed above, it is very difficult to rely on their evidence, given the glaring omissions and contradictions in their court testimony.
31
Md. Sairat Ali @ Md. Ameer Hossain Sairat vs Abdul Hamid and others
Discharged with cost of Tk. 1000(one thousand)
32
Most. Shamsun Nahar Begum and others vs Most. Mondirer Nahar and ors
Discharged
33
Mohammad Abdul Bashar Miah vs Nurjahan Begum and others
Discharged
34
Dr. Nobokrishno Gosh vs Suvash Chandra Gosh and others
Discharged
35
Banobihari Sarder vs Sree Gobinda Chandra Mondal and others
Absolute
36
Md. Tariqul Islam Tokon vs Md. Allek Ali and others
The Rule is discharged.
37
Abdul Azis Sarkar and others vs.Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Land and others
Absolute in part
38
Syed Ali and others ...defendant No. 1, 2(a)-2(f), 3-4- appellants-petitioners Versus Mohammad Ali and others ...Plaintiff-respondent-opposite parties Mr. Md. Hamidur Rahman with Mr. Md. Shahinozzaman with Mr. Md. Delwar Hossain with Mr. Ramesh Chandra Roy and Ms. Shahinur Akter, Advocates ... for the petitioners Mr. Md. Abdul Kader Bhuiyan, Advocate ..for the opposite parties
absolute
39
Nautical Bulk Carriers S.A. and another Vs. M.V. PROSPERITY and others
Order passed
40
Omar Kader Chowdhury ... Petitioner Versus Principal Rafiqul Islam and others ... Opposite parties
Absolute
41
Khandaker Md. Omor Faruk Kamal -Versus- The State and another
The appeal is allowed.
42
Khandaker Md. Omor Faruk Kamal -Versus- The State and another
The appeal is allowed.
43
The inclusion of land measuring an area of .0404 acres published in the Bangladesh Gazette additional issue dated 06.05.2012, so far it relates to SA plots 3335 and 3336 is hereby declared to have without lawful and of no legal effect. The respondents are directed to delete SA plots 3335 and 3336 measuring an area of .0404 acres from the aforesaid list of Arpita Sampatti enlisted at serial 209 of page 41475 in the official gazette published on 06.05.2012.
44
However, the judgment passed in these writ petitions will not preclude the petitioners from taking legal steps to get their compensation in accordance with law. If the petitioners being dissatisfied with the award amount approach before the Arbitration Tribunal as per the provisions of the Ordinance, 1982 the limitation prescribed in the law shall not be stand as bar.
45
Md. Jashim Uddin -Versus- Mosobbir Mia and others
Disposed of
46
Singair Bilateral High School and another -Versus- Md. Ismail Hossain and others
.
47
Shukur Ali Master and others -Versus- Doraj Kazi and others
.
48
Prof. Dr. Ali Zaheer Al-Amin and others. - Versus - Impulse Health Services and Research Centre Limited and others
Constitutes an independent Interim Board of Directors.
49
Md. Abdul Malek being dead his legal heirs Md. Monjur Morshed and others. -Versus- Jessore Plastic Industries Limited and others
Allowed.
50
Md. Shafiqul Islam and others. -VERSUS- Nigom Builders Limited and others
Disposed of.
This Site is Visited :