: High Court Division Full List
 
Case Type
Case/Tender Number
Year
Parties
Short Description
 

Case Number Parties Short Description
1
Md. Sukchan Ali -Vs- The State and another
“Intention to cheat must be proved to have existed at the time when the offence was committed, and subsequent conduct or failure to fulfill a promise would not constitute an offense under section 415 of the penal code. when a person promises to pay the price of goods, and on his undertaking to pay, the goods were delivered to him, but he fails to pay the price thereof, no case of cheating would lie against him.”
2
Kazi Jahanara Islam being died as her heirs Md. Habibur Rahman and others Vs. Md. Abul Basher Bhuiyan and another
Dismissed
3
Rahmat Ali and others Vs. Md. Anwar Hossain
Dismissed
4
Manager, Sonali Bank Limited Vs. Manager, Pubali Bank Limited and others
Dismissed
5
Badrunnessa and others Vs. Fatema Rahman and others
Dismissed
6
Md. Jahangir Alom (Bahar) -Vs- The State and another
If a husband demands dowry to his wife directly, instead of her parents or guardians, such demand will not come under the purview of section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1980.
7
Mostafizur Rahman Shahin and others ...........Convict-Appellants -Versus- The State ------- Respondent
Section 4 of the Explosive Substance Act
8
Md. Shahin Ferdous Vs. Md. Abdul Mannan and others
.
9
Md. Khalilur Rahman @ Md. Khalilur Rahman Mondol vs. The State and another.
When cognizance of the offence of section 468 PC is barred by section 195(1)(c) Cr.PC.
10
Md. Akter Hossain (Jamal) and others Vs. Md. Sayad and others
.
11
M/S Malancha Filling Station versus Bangladesh, represented by its Secretary, Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources, Bangladesh Secretariat, Ramna, Dhaka and others
Absolute
12
Md. Asadul Islam-Vs-The Government of Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Power, Energy and Mineral Resources and others
Absolute with direction
13
Md. Rafiqul Islam ... Convict-Petitioner. -VersusThe Sate and another ... Opposite Parties
The Rule is discharged
14
Md. Mokhlechur Rahman -Versus- The State and another
Discharged
15
Md. Mokhlechur Rahman -versus- The State and another
Discharged
16
Mohammad Alamgir versus Government of the People`s Republic of Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs, Bangladesh Secretariat, Police Station-Ramna, District- Dhaka and others
Discharged
17
Salauddin Ahmed versus Government of the People`s Republic of Bangladesh, represented by its Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs, Bangladesh Secretariat, Ramna, Dhaka others
Discharged
18
Md. Abdul Khaleque and another versus Government of the People`s Republic of Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs, Bangladesh Secretariat, Dhaka, and others
Discharged
19
Md. Kamruzzaman (Kabul) versus Government of the People`s Republic of Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Environment, Bangladesh Secretariat, Dhaka, others
Discharged
20
Probir Ghosh versus Government of the People`s Republic of Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs, Bangladesh Secretariat, Dhaka, others
Discharged
21
1. M/S. T.N. Bricks 2. M/S. Paragon Bricks 3. M/S. Juldha Bricks Manufacturing versus Government of the People`s Republic of Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Environment, Bangladesh Secretariat, Dhaka others
Discharged
22
Md. Aksatur Rahman versus Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs, Bangladesh Secretariat, Shahbag, Dhaka, and others
Discharged
23
Mst. Aklima Khatun, daughter of Akramul Haque, and Majeda Khanam, Assistant Teacher, Index No. 562457, Nilfamari Natun Bi-Lateral High School, District-Nilfamari versus Government of the People`s Republic of Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Education, Bangladesh Secretariat, Ramna, Dhaka 1000, and others
Disposed of
24
Md. Abdul Kader and another versus Government of the People`s Republic of Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs, Bangladesh Secretariat, Abdul Goni Road, Dhaka, others
Disposed of
25
Shafiul Bashar Moni versus Government of the People`s Republic of Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs, Bangladesh Secretariat, Police Station-Ramna, District-Dhaka others
Discharged
26
Md. Aktar Hossain versus Government of the People`s Republic of Bangladesh, represented by its Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs, Bangladesh Secretariat, Ramna, Dhaka others
Discharged
27
Md. Julhash Ahmed versus Government of the People`s Republic of Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Environment, Bangladesh Secretariat, Dhaka, others
Discharged
28
Mosammot Bilkis Ara Begum versus Md. Masud Sarkar (Kanak) and others
Allowed
29
A.M. Mahmudur Rahman. -VERSUS- Uttara Club Limited and others.
Dismissed
30
Md. Jahsim Uddin Ahmed ...Convict-Appellant -Versus- The State and another ...Respondent
The appeal is allowed
31
Shaila Shelley Khan and others. -VERSUS- Premier Bank PLC and others.
Disposed of.
32
Mohammad Humayan Akhter ... Plaintiff-Appellant -Versus- Akhter Kabir Chowdhury and others ... Defendant-Respondents
Dismissed
33
Mst. Nurjahan ... Convict-Petitioner -Versus- The State and another ...Complainant-Opposite Parties
The Rule is discharged
34
Md. Jashim Uddin -Versus- Jesmin Akter
.
35
Ananda Bag Mills Limited and others -Versus- Secretary, Ministry of Shipping, Government of Bangladesh, Dhaka and others
.
36
Md. Abdul Hannan Gazi and another Vs. Mustari Begum and others
.
37
Sukur Ali being dead his heirs: 1(a) Md. Baccu Mia and others Vs. Adam Ali and others
Thus, we are of the considered view that although a Court, in a simple suit for partition, may incidentally examine questions of title for the limited purpose of determining the shares of the co-sharers, it cannot adjudicate serious and complicated disputes relating to title in a suit framed merely for partition. Where the plaintiff`s title is under a cloud and partition cannot be effected without first determining such title, the suit must be appropriately framed with a prayer for declaration of title. In the absence of such a prayer, a simple suit for partition is not maintainable.
38
Md. Sofiqul Islam and another Vs. Nilu Barua and others
Accordingly, we are of the view that where third-party purchasers prima facie prove that they acquired title and interest in the suit property prior to the institution of the suit and that the decree was passed in their absence, the appellate court may set aside the ex parte decree, remand the suit for fresh trial, direct that they be added as defendants, and permit them to file written statements and contest the suit on merits.
40
Aleya Enterprise Limited and others-Vs-The Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Energy and Mineral Resources Division, Ministry of Power, Energy and Mineral Resources and others
Absolute
42
Md. Shahidullah and others. -VERSUS- Md. Monir Hossain and others.
Dismissed
43
Md. Nazrul Islam versus The Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh, represented by Secretary Ministry of Land, Bangladesh, Secretariat, Shahbag, Dhaka and others
Discharged
44
H.M. Steel and Industries Limited and M/s. R.B. Con-cast and Re-rolling Mills (Pvt.) Ltd. Vs. NBR and others
Rule disposed of
45
Md. Abu Jafar Vs. Munshi Khalilur Rahman and others
.
46
Mercantile Insurance Company Limited. -Versus- The Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh and others.
Dismissed
47
Md. Abu Sayeed and another ... Plaintiff-Petitioners -Versus- Alauddin Sarker and others ... Defendant-Opposite Parties
Disposed of
48
Noman Ahmed vs. The State and another
Compromise in section 138 cases, NI Act.
49
If the legal notice is found not to have been served, the trial is vitiated.
50
Md. Enayet Karim -Vs- The State and Anti-corruption Commission, Dhaka
Allowed
This Site is Visited :