Judgment : High Court Division Full List
 
Case Type
Case/Tender Number
Year
Parties
Short Description
 

Case Number Parties Short Description
1
Md. Amir Hamja Asif and others-Vs-Vice Chancellor, Patuakhali Science and Technology University (PSTU) and others
Disposed of
2
Sree Hori Sarker ... Plaintiff-Appellant-Petitioner -Versus- Sree Dhirendra Nath Sarker and others ... Defendants-Respondents-Opposite parties
The Rule is discharged
3
The State-Versus-Md. Shafiqul Islam @ Shafique
4
Mojibal Haque vs. Jannatul Ferdous Begum and others
absolute
5
Abdul Jabbar Talukder and another vs. Dewan Shamsul Alam being dead his legal heirs Hasna Ara Begum and others
absolute
6
Mojibal Haque vs. Jannatul Ferdous Begum and others
absolute
7
Md. Fazlur Rahman and others ...Plaintiff-appellant-petitioners -Versus- Government of Bangladesh represented by the Deputy Commissioner, Pabna. …Defendant-respondent-opposite party
8
Melimas Shipping S.A. ….. Plaintiff -VERSUS- Bangladesh Chemical Industries Corporation and others. .....…Defendants
9
Dhaka Bank Limited Vs. Otto Textile Mills Limited and others
10
Md. Al-Mamunur Rashid VS. Most. Dilara Parvin @ Dulali
11
Md. Amir Hamja Asif and others-Vs-Vice Chancellor, Patuakhali Science and Technology University (PSTU) and others
Disposed of
12
The State.-Versus- Md. Abdul Kuddus
Rejected
13
Syed Mohammad Rahman represented by his constituted attorney Mohammad Rashed. -Versus- The People’s Republic of Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Housing and Public Works, Secretariat Bhaban, Ramna, Dhaka and others.
14
Redwan Ahmed, Ex Minister of State, Ministry of Liberation War Affairs and Ex- Chairman, Central Command Council, Bangaldesh Muktijoddha Sangsad.Redwan Ahmed, Ex Minister of State, Ministry of Liberation War Affairs and Ex- Chairman, Central Command Council, Bangaldesh Muktijoddha Sangsad. -Versus- The State and another.
15
Ansar Ali and others Vs. Abdul Matin and others
16
Md. Sheikh Sadi ... Petitioner -Versus- The Sate and another ... Opposite Parties
The Rule is discharged
17
Md. Ashraful Islam ... Convict-Appellant-Petitioner -Versus- The State and another ... Respondent-Opposite Parties
The Rule is made absolute
18
Md. Khursed Alam and others-Vs-Bangladesh and others
Discharged
19
Rubel Ahmed Pabel-Vs-Government of Bangladesh and others
Absolute
20
China Begum ...Convict- Petitioner -Versus- The State and another ............... Opposite Parties.
The Rule is discharged
21
Md. Mostafa ...Convict-Petitioner. -Versus- The State and another ...............Respondent-Opposite Parties.
The Rule is discharged
22
Md. Abul Hashem @ Rubel ...Convict-Appellant-Petitioner -Versus- The State ...............Respondent-Opposite Party
The Rule is made absolute
23
Sajjatuz Jumma ...Convict- Petitioner -Versus- The State and another ............... Opposite Parties
The Rule is discharged
24
Md. Nur Hossain-Vs-Bangladesh and others
Absolute
25
Bilkis Begum vs. The state
Discharged
26
Hefajatur Rahman Vs. The state
Discharged
27
Mohammad Alauddin and others vs. The state
Discharged
28
Md. Hasan Chowdhury @ alias Sohel Vs. The state
Discharged
29
Md. Gazi Abdul Khaleque vs. The state
Discharged
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
Md. Badiuzzaman Prang (Boida) -Versus- The State and another
37
Sheikh Abdur Rouf Vs. Md. Abul Hossain and another
Now the question is no longer a res integra. As per provision of section 21A(b) of the Specific Relief Act no contract for sale of any immovable property can be specifically enforced unless the balance amount of consideration of the contract is deposited in the Court at the time of filing the suit for specific performance of the contract. In other words, Failure of depositing the balance amount of the consideration money by the plaintiff at the time of filing the suit for specific performance of the contract for sale of immovable property it cannot be specifically enforced in view of the provisions under section 21A(b) of the Specific Relief Act, 1877 and such suit cannot be maintained.
38
39
The State. -Versus- Md. Atiar Rahman (absconding).
Rejected
40
Bank Asia PLC, Principal Office Branch, Dhaka situated at 111-113, Motijheel C/A, Dhaka-1000, Bangladesh.-Vs-The Court of Artha Rin Adalat, Court No. 02, Dhaka and others.
Discharged
41
Md. Harun_or-Rashid Vs. The Government of Bangladesh and others
Rule is made absolute.
42
Md. Anwar Hossain and others Vs. Government of Bangladesh
Rule is made absolute.
43
The State-Vs.-Md. Bachchu Hawlader
The death reference is rejected and the case is sent back on remand to the trial Court for re-trial.
44
Md. Abdul Khalek Vs. Government of Bangladesh and others
Rule is made absolute.
45
The State-Vs.-Abdul Aziz
Accepted
46
The State-Vs.-Md. Hanif Shikder
Rejected with modification
47
Md. Zahirul Islam and another Vs. Md. Afaz Uddin and others
48
Md. Selimuzzaman Bhuiyan and others-Vs-Government of the People‟s Republic of Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Secondary and Higher Secondary Education Division, Ministry of Education, Bangladesh Secretariat, Ramna, Dhaka and others.
Petitioner Nos.1-3 Rule is discharged and petitioner Nos.4-6 Rule is disposed of
49
Md. Khokon @ Mohammad Hossain and others, all are sons of late Md. Ibrahim of 24/2 Mukim Katara, Police Station- Lalbag, District- Dhaka.-Vs-The learned Judge, Artha Rin Adalat No. 4, Dhaka and others.
Absolute
50
Md. Abdus Salam and others -Vs- The state
Absolute
This Site is Visited :