|
Case Number
|
Parties |
Short Description |
|
1 |
Writ Petition 11082/2015
(Writ Petition 11082/2015)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 15-SEP-26
|
Md. Omar Faruque ……. Petitioner Vs. Bangladesh and others …Respondents |
Absolute |
|
2 |
Writ Petition 9286/2017
(Writ Petition 9286/2017)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 15-SEP-26
|
Govt. of Bangladesh represented by the Deputy Commissioner, Narsingdi, District- Narsinngdi. ……. Petitioner Vs. Md. Osman Mia being died his legal heirs. ……Respondents |
Discharged |
|
3 |
Writ Petition 8699/2015
(Writ Petition 8699/2015)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 15-SEP-26
|
Md. Golam Mostafa ……. Petitioner Vs. Govt. of Bangladesh represented by the Senior Secretary, Ministry of Public Administration, Bangladesh Secretariat, Ramna, Dhaka and others ……Respondents |
Discharged. |
|
4 |
Writ Petition 8128/2023
(Writ Petition 8128/2023)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 15-SEP-26
|
Jamuna Fertilizer company Limited Represented by the Managing Director ……. Petitioner Vs. Govt. of Bangladesh represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Labour and employment, Bangladesh Secretariat, Ramna, Dhaka. ……Respondents |
Discharged |
|
5 |
Writ Petition 7401/2024
(Writ Petition 7401/2024)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 15-SEP-26
|
Md. Jahidul Islam ……. Petitioner Vs. Govt. of Bangladesh represented by the Ministry of Law and Justice Division and others ……Respondents |
Discharged. |
|
6 |
Writ Petition 6429/2009
(Writ Petition 6429/2009)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 15-SEP-26
|
Md.Fazlul Karim and another ……. Petitioners Vs. Govt. of Bangladesh represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Educationand others ……Respondents |
Discharged. |
|
7 |
Writ Petition 4334/2009
(Writ Petition 4334/2009)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 15-SEP-26
|
Md. Muzammel Haque ……. Petitioner Vs. Govt. of Bangladesh represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Educationand others …Respondents |
Absolute |
|
8 |
Writ Petition (TN) 3241/2216
(Writ Petition 3241/2216)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 15-SEP-26
|
Kazi Mohammad Moazzam Hossain ……. Petitioner Vs. Govt. of Bangladesh represented by the Ministry of Law, Justice and parlimentary Affairs, Dhaka. ……Respondents |
Discharged. |
|
9 |
Writ Petition 2339/2025
(Writ Petition 2339/2025)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 15-SEP-26
|
Md. Tariqul Islam ……. Petitioner Vs. Govt. of Bangladesh represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Power Energy and Mineral Recouse, Ramna, Dhaka and others …Respondents |
Absolute |
|
10 |
Writ Petition 2327/2022
(Writ Petition 2327/2022)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 15-SEP-26
|
Md. Nasir Uddin ……. Petitioner Vs. Govt. of Bangladesh represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Law, Justice and parlimentary Affairs, Bangladesh Secretariat Building, Ramna, Dhaka and others. …Respondents |
Discharged |
|
11 |
Writ Petition (TN) 3241/2016
(writ petition)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 15-SEP-26
|
Kazi Mohammad Moazzam Hossain ……. Petitioner Vs. Govt. of Bangladesh represented by the Ministry of Law, Justice and parlimentary Affairs, Dhaka. ……Respondents |
Kazi Matter |
|
12 |
First Misc Appeal 60/2026
(First Misc Appeal 60/2026)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 15-SEP-26
|
SQ Birichina -Versus- Mercantile Bank PLC, Gulshan Branch, Gulshan, Dhaka and others |
This First Misc. Appeal is dismissed. |
|
13 |
First Appeal (TN) 283/2019
(First Appeal (TN) 283/2019)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 15-SEP-26
|
Jannatul Ferdous -Versus- Samina Sabiha (Ria) and others |
This First Appeal is allowed. |
|
14 |
Criminal Revision 1754/2023
(Criminal Revision No. 1754/2023)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 15-SEP-26
|
Md. Mofiz Ali ...Convict-Petitioner. -Versus- The State and another ... Opposite Parties. |
The Rule is disposed of |
|
15 |
Criminal Revision (TN) 3303/2019
(Criminal Revision No. 3303/2019)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 15-SEP-26
|
Md. Wali Ullah Patowari ...Convict-Petitioner. -Versus- The State and another ... Opposite Parties. |
The Rule is disposed of |
|
16 |
Criminal Revision 249/2025
(Criminal Revision 249/2025)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 15-SEP-26
|
Most. Rubina Yeasmin ... Convict-Petitioner -Versus- The State and another ...Complainant-Opposite Parties |
The Rule is discharged |
|
17 |
First Appeal (TN) 2874/2019
(First Appeal (TN) 2874/2019)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on :
|
Niko Resources (Bangladesh) Limited -Versus- The People’s Republic of Bangladesh, represented by its Secretary, Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources, Bangladesh Secretariat, Dhaka and others |
The Rule is made absolute. |
|
18 |
First Appeal 404/2013
(First Appeal 404/2013)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 15-SEP-26
|
Md. Bashir Miah Versus- Mst. Ajhara Akter Koli and others |
This First Appeal is allowed. |
|
19 |
Writ Petition 21054/2025
(Writ Petition 21054/2025)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 14-SEP-26
|
Auto Star Trade … Petitioner -Versus- Commissioner of Customs, Customs House, Mongla, Bagerhat, Bangladesh and others. … Respondents |
Disposed of |
|
20 |
Death Reference 53/2025
(Death Reference 53/2025)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 14-SEP-26
|
The State ..... petitioner -Versus- Md. Hitu Sheikh alias Etu Sheikh ..... condemned-prisoner |
In view of the discussion made hereinabove, the reference is accepted. The judgment and order of conviction and sentence of death passed by the Tribunal is hereby upheld. Accordingly, the criminal appeal is dismissed and the jail appeal is disposed of.
But in the evidence of witnesses, we find that the defence very casually cross-examined the prosecution witnesses which is very unwanted. The accused was charged with rape followed by murder which provides capital punishment. In such a case, if the accused is found unable to engage a competent Advocate to defend him, in that case the Court may on its own initiative can appoint an experienced Advocate to defend the accused. |
|
21 |
Civil Revision 4319/1997
(Civil Revision 4319/1997)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 14-SEP-26
|
Government of Bangladesh and others -Versus- Afsaruddin Beg and others |
A doubtful, unproved or legally infirm document cannot constitute the juridical foundation of title, and, in the absence of a prima facie title, an adverse entry in the record-of-rights, even if alleged to be erroneous, cannot ipso facto confer upon the plaintiff any declaratory or possessory right. Qui sentit commodum, sentire debet et onus (i.e., he who enjoys the benefit must also bear the burden) has no application to create a proprietary right where its legal source itself remains unproved. |
|
22 |
Company Matter 1393/2026
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 14-SEP-26
|
Nilima Yasmin and another Vs. Supermax Healthcare Ltd. and others. |
Allowed. |
|
23 |
Admiralty Suit (TN) 1393/2025
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 14-SEP-26
|
JG Facility Management Limited Vs. The Registrar of Joint Stock Companies and Firms and others. |
Allowed |
|
24 |
Writ Petition 5238/2025
(Writ Petition)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 13-SEP-26
|
M/S Moushumi Traders, its Proprietor Md. Nazmul Hasan, son of Siraj Ullah Bhuiyan and others.-Vs-Judge, Artha Rin Adalat No. 1, Dhaka and others. |
Discharged |
|
25 |
Writ Petition 6819/2026
(Writ Petition 6819/2026)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 09-SEP-26
|
Md. Roman Bhoyan …..Petitioner -Versus- Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs, Government of the People`s Republic of Bangladesh, Bangladesh Secretariat, Ramna, Dhaka and others |
Relating to passport of former Hon`ble Judges of the Supreme Court of Bangladesh |
|
26 |
Income Tax Reference 123/2019
(Income Tax Reference 123/2019, 124/2019 and 125/2019)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 09-SEP-26
|
The Commissioner of Taxes, Taxes Zone-1, Chattagram vs Confidence Cement Ltd., Chattagram |
The first question was decided based on the non-obstante clause of sub-section (1) of section 82C of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1984. Tax deducted at source (TDS) under section 53 of the Ordinance, on the import of goods by an industrial undertaking as raw materials for its own consumption (such as a cement factory), shall be assessed as regular source of income instead of under section 82C. Conversely, TDS under section 52 read with rule 16 shall be assessed under section 82C of the Ordinance. The second question was decided on the basis that the reduction and deletion of disallowances of claimed expenses, as well as the reduction of estimated sales are purely factual matters involving no complex question of law. Therefore, we are of the view that we should not disturb the factual findings legally settled by the Tribunal. |
|
27 |
Writ Petition 6604/2024
(Writ Petition 6604/2024)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 09-SEP-26
|
OnMobile Global Limited vs National Board of Revenue and others |
The issuance of a notice under section 213 of the Income Tax Act, 2023 to revise the erroneous assessment order passed by the DCT, after the expiry of four years from the date of the order sought to be revised, is declared to have been issued without lawful authority and to be of no legal effect. |
|
28 |
Writ Petition 6163/2008
(Writ Petition 6163/2008)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 09-SEP-26
|
Solar Television Mfg. Ltd. vs Customs, Excise and VAT Appellate Tribunal, Dhaka and others |
The Customs, Excise and VAT Appellate Tribunal is required to dispose of an appeal by passing such order or orders as it deems fit upon consideration of the merits of the case, thereby confirming, modifying, or annulling the decision or order appealed against. The order of the Tribunal, dismissing the appeal for default, is hereby declared to have been passed without lawful authority and hence, is of no legal effect. |
|
29 |
Writ Petition 2508/2026
(Writ Petition 2508/2026)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 09-SEP-26
|
Engineer Md. Mohosin vs Commissioner of Taxes, Taxes Zone-1, Chattogram and others |
The legislature intends for a person to be given a fair opportunity to defend him or herself before any decision is made that negatively impacts his or her rights, property, or status. The person must be given a genuine opportunity to present his or her side of the story, submit evidence, and challenge or cross-examine the evidence brought against him or her. A court must fix a date that gives the defendant reasonable and sufficient time to prepare his or her defense and travel to the court. Therefore, the matter is remanded back to respondent No. 1 for a rehearing. This will afford the petitioner a meaningful opportunity to be heard and to adduce further evidence, if any. |
|
30 |
Writ Petition 1671/2021
(Writ Petition 1671/2021 and 1672/2021)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 09-SEP-26
|
BSRM Steels Limited vs Commissioner of Taxes, Large Taxpayer’s Unit (LTU), Dhaka |
The first issue was decided on the basis that the disallowance of expenses from the profit and loss accounts and the manufacturing and trading accounts are purely factual matters involving no complex question of law. Therefore, we are of the view that we should not disturb the factual findings legally settled by the Commissioner of Taxes in disposing of the revisional application under section 121A of the Ordinance. The second issue was decided based on the non-obstante clause of sub-section (1) of section 82C of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1984, The business income of the petitioner was classified correctly by the DCT based on deduction of tax at source for recovery of minimum tax under section 82C of the Ordinance. As such, the Rules in above two writ petitions are hereby discharged. |
|
31 |
VAT Appeal 76/2015
(VAT Appeal 76/2015)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 09-SEP-26
|
Kaniz Fatema vs Customs, Excise and VAT Appellate Tribunal, Dhaka and others |
We are of the view that the redemption fine should be aligned with the rationalized standard deemed reasonable by the Legislature and subsequently codified in the Finance Act, 2014. Accordingly, respondent No.4 is directed to modify the redemption fine and fix it at 50% of the actual evaded VAT amount in place of an astronomical amount. |
|
32 |
Income Tax Reference 582/2019
(Income Tax Reference 582/2019)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 09-SEP-26
|
IPCO Developments (Bangladesh) Limited vs The Commissioner of Taxes, Taxes Zone-6, Dhaka. |
For the purpose of computing income or losses, as assessee must first have income under section 28 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1984. From that income, allowable expenses shall be deducted under section 29 of the Ordinance, subject to certain circumstances where deductions are not admissible as provided under section 30 of the Ordinance. We find that the Tribunal was fully justified in upholding the rejection of the claim of business loss. The statutory mechanics of the Ordinance dictate that business deductions cannot be claimed against a non-existent revenue stream prior to the commencement of commercial operation. |
|
33 |
Income Tax Reference 317/2018
(Income Tax Reference 317/2018)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 09-SEP-26
|
BBC Bangladesh Limited vs The Commissioner of Taxes, Taxes Zone-8, Dhaka |
The disallowance of expenses from the profit and loss accounts is purely factual matters involving no complex question of law. Therefore, we are of the view that we should not disturb the factual findings legally settled by the Tribunal. We find no provision of law that allows for the determination of foreign currency invested as a “share money deposit” as income under section 28 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1984. While the Tribunal is competent to decide all questions of fact and law and serves as the final arbiter of factual matters, the legal aspects were entirely ignored. |
|
34 |
Income Tax Reference 316/2018
(Income Tax Reference 316/2018)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 09-SEP-26
|
BBC Bangladesh Limited vs The Commissioner of Taxes, Taxes Zone-8, Dhaka |
The disallowance of expenses from the profit and loss accounts is purely factual matters involving no complex question of law. Therefore, we are of the view that we should not disturb the factual findings legally settled by the Tribunal. The second question was decided based on that we find no provision of law that allows for the determination of foreign currency invested as a “share money deposit” as income under section 28 of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1984. While the Tribunal is competent to decide all questions of fact and law and serves as the final arbiter of factual matters, the legal aspects were entirely ignored. |
|
35 |
Income Tax Reference 303/2018
(Income Tax Reference 303/2018 and 304/2018)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 09-SEP-26
|
Zen International Limited, Dhaka vs The Commissioner of Taxes, Taxes Zone-10, Dhaka. |
The first question was decided on the basis that the disallowance of expenses, including losses from burglaries, from the profit and loss accounts are purely factual matters involving no complex question of law. Therefore, we are of the view that we should not disturb the factual findings legally settled by the Tribunal. The second question was decided based on the principle that the estimation of commission receipts is also a factual matter unless proved otherwise with verifiable evidence. In the present case, the applicant received commissions from bKash Limited (a BRAC Bank subsidiary) which is supported by verifiable evidence. Hence, we are of the view that the Tribunal estimated the commission receipts without applying a judicial mind. |
|
36 |
Income Tax Reference 258/2015
(Income Tax Reference 258/2015)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 09-SEP-26
|
Alltex Industries Limited vs The Commissioner of Taxes, Large Taxpayers Unit (LTU), Dhaka |
It is our considered view that while section 35(3) of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1984 directs the applicant company to furnish a trading account, a profit and loss account, and a balance sheet certified by a Chartered Accountant, such certification does not dispense with the statutory requirement to produce primary, verifiable evidence in support of the specific financial claims made therein. The disallowance of claimed expenses and estimation of gross profit are purely factual matters, involving no complex questions of law. Therefore, we are of the view that we should not disturb the factual findings legally settled by the Tribunal. |
|
37 |
Income Tax Reference 48/2018
(Income Tax Reference 48/2018 and 02/2023)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 09-SEP-26
|
Hatil Complex Limited, Dhaka vs The Commissioner of Taxes, Taxes Zone-7, Dhaka |
It is our considered view that while section 35(3) of the Income Tax Ordinance, 1984 directs the applicant company to furnish a trading account, a profit and loss account, and a balance sheet certified by a Chartered Accountant, such certification does not dispense with the statutory requirement to produce primary, verifiable evidence in support of the specific financial claims made therein. The disallowance of claimed expenses and estimation of sales are purely factual matters, involving no complex question of law. We are of the view that we should not disturb the factual findings legally settled by the Tribunal. |
|
38 |
First Appeal 312/2018
(First Appeal 312/2018)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 09-SEP-26
|
Azahar Uddin Bhuiyan, being dead, his legal heirs, 1(b) Md. Anowarul Salam Bhuiyan and others Vs. Chandraban Bibi and others |
Allowed |
|
39 |
Civil Revision 6619/2023
(Against Order)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 09-SEP-26
|
Aziz Al Kaiser Vs. Mrs. Tabassum Kaiser and others |
Order of Injunction |
|
40 |
Writ Petition 12205/2024
(Writ Petition 12205/2024)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 09-SEP-26
|
Md. Alkas Uddin Ahmed verus The Government of the People`s Republic of Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Education, Secretariat Building, Ramna, Dhaka and others |
Disposed of |
|
41 |
Criminal Revision 6579/2024
(Criminal Revision 6579/2024)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 08-SEP-26
|
Md. Thandu Mia vs. The State and another |
S.138A NI Act has overriding effect over S.246(2A) of the Cr.PC. |
|
42 |
Writ Petition 8325/2014
(.../)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 08-SEP-26
|
Bangladesh Environmental Lawyers Association (BELA) vs. Government of Bangladesh and others |
Judgment of Bakkhali River flowing from Cox`s Bazar to the Bay of Bengal. |
|
43 |
Civil Revision 5342/2024
(Civil Revision 5342/2024)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 08-SEP-26
|
Md. Abdur Rob Howlader and others ... Defendant-Petitioners -Versus- Dita Majumder and others ...Plaintiff-Opposite Parties |
Discharged |
|
44 |
Death Reference 140/2019
(Death Reference 140/2019)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 08-SEP-26
|
The State .....petitioner -Versus- S.M. Sirajuddowla and 15 others .....condemned-prisoners |
In the result, the reference is accepted in part, so far it relates to condemned prisoners S.M. Sirajuddowla and Shahadat Hossain Shamim and rejected in respect of others. The criminal appeals 13886 and 14698 of 2019 filed by the condemned prisoners S.M. Sirajuddowla and Shahadat Hossain Shamim respectively are dismissed. Criminal Appeals 13887, 13888, 14097, 13885 of 2019 filed by Nooruddin, Shakhawat Hossain Jabed, Saifur Rahman Md. Zubayer and Umme Sultana Poppy respectively are hereby dismissal with commutation of their death sentence to imprisonment for life. The Criminal Appeals 12019, 12268, 12296, 12293, 13882, 14096, 14473, 14637 and 14697 of 2019 filed by the condemned prisoners Mohammad Shamim, Ruhul Amin, Maksud Alam Councilor, Afsaruddin, Hafez Abdul Kader, Abdur Rahim Sharif, Iftekharuddin Rana, Imran Hossain Mamun, Mohiuddin Shakil and Quamrunnahar Moni respectively are allowed and they are acquitted of the charges levelled against them. Let them be immediately set at liberty, if not wanted in connection with any other cases. Jail Appeals are accordiongly disposed of. |
|
45 |
Civil Revision 2848/2025
(Civil Revision 2848/2025)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 08-SEP-26
|
Halima Yeasmin and others Vs Jaheda Begum and others |
It is made clear that the question of limitation and exclusion of time under Section 14 of the Limitation Act shall be determined by the competent appellate Court in accordance with law and upon consideration of the facts and circumstances relating to the prosecution of the proceeding before the wrong forum. Nothing contained herein shall be construed as an automatic or unconditional condonation of delay. |
|
46 |
First Appeal 49/2021
(First Appeal 49/2021)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 08-SEP-26
|
Mohammad Jinna Miah and another -Versus- Mosarrof Hossen and others |
This First Appeal is allowed. |
|
47 |
First Misc Appeal (TN) 290/2018
(with Civil Rule No. 236 (FM) of 2022)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 07-SEP-26
|
Globe Construction Limited -vs- Rajdhani Unnayan Kartipakkha (RAJUK) and others |
Appeal Dismissed. Rule Discharged |
|
48 |
Civil Revision 4437/2010
(Civil Revision 4437/2010)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 07-SEP-26
|
Md. Yasin Ali Sheikh VS Md. Mohammad Ishaq and others |
Absolute |
|
49 |
Criminal Revision 2952/2023
(Criminal Revision 2952/2023)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 07-SEP-26
|
Babu Prodeep Kanti Das ... Convict-Appellant-Petitioner -Versus- The State and another ... Opposite parties |
The Rule is disposed of |
|
50 |
Criminal Appeal(H) 1058/2025
(Criminal Appeal(H) 1058/2025)
অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 07-SEP-26
|
Reaz Uddin Shepai ...Convict-Appellant -Versus- The State, represented by the Deputy Commissioner, Dhaka ...Respondent |
The appeal is allowed |
