: High Court Division Full List
 
Case Type
Case/Tender Number
Year
Parties
Short Description
 

Case Number Parties Short Description
1
Md. Didrul Alam Chowdhury vs. The state and another
Discharged
2
The State ..... petitioner -Versus- Akash alias Mithu ..... condemned-prisoner
Consequently, the death reference is rejected. The criminal appeal is dismissed. The judgment and order of conviction passed by the Tribunal under section 11(Ka) of the Nari-o-Shishu Nirjatan Ain, 2000 against the condemned-prisoner is hereby converted to one under section 302 of the Penal Code and his sentence of death is commuted to imprisonment for life with a fine of Taka 10,000/-, failing to pay the fine he shall suffer imprisonment for 03(three) months more. The jail appeal is accordingly disposed of.
3
Mohammad Rashid and another -Vs- The State
The rule of law that the evidence of one party should not be received as evidence against another party without the latter having an opportunity of testing it by cross-examination.

In the absence of a chemical examination report under Section 50 of the Madok Drobbo Niyantran Ain, 1990, it cannot be said that the alleged Yaba Tablets or any ingredient of narcotics contained any ingredient of amphetamine or narcotics.

The doubtful and suspect nature of the evidence sought to be relied upon to substantiate the circumstances suffered from serious infirmities and lacked legal credibility.
4
Popy Banarjee, Advocate, District Bar Association, Khulna-Vs-The Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Security Service Division, Ministry of Home Affairs and others
Absolute
5
Abdul Aziz Vs. Unidev Trading (BD) Limited and others
.
6
মোঃ মাছুম বিল্লাল - বনাম- রাষ্ট্র গং
The assessment of valuation made by the Income Tax Department has legal validity which should not be quostioned by another independent government department.
7
Bangladesh Textile Mills Association (BTMA). -Versus- Chan Chao International Co. Ltd. and others.
Arbitration Appllication Nos. 36/2025 and 44/2025 -dismissed; Arbitration Application No. 45/2025 -Allowed.
8
Md. Abdul Baset ...Convict-Appellant -Versus- The State and another ...Respondent
The appeal is allowed
9
The State ...petitioner -Versus- Md. Nuruzzaman ...condemned-prisoner
In the result, we hold that the reference is liable to be rejected and accordingly, it is rejected. The appeals filed by the condemned prisoner and other two convicts are allowed and the Jail Appeal is accordingly disposed of.
10
Ala Uddin and others Vs. Government
The learned cognizance Magistrate concerned is however directed to hear on the naraji application, afresh and then hold a further inquiry in the case under section 202 of the Cr.P.C. on the allegation made in the naraji about to discover the truthness and falsehood of the allegation as made and then if so the case stand under section 302 of the Penal Code, shall send the record towards the Court of Sessions for taking cognizance and also for holding trial thereto.
11
The State ...petitioner -Versus- Md. Nuruzzaman ...condemned-prisoner
So, it can be safely concluded that the deceased committed suicide at the house of the accused persons. Therefore, we hold that the condemned prisoner is under no more obligation to explain, how his wife died at his house. Such being the case, we hold that the learned Judge of the Tribunal has awarded sentence upon the accused persons misreading the evidence on record and, therefore, reached in such an erroneous decisions regarding conviction and sentence of the accused persons. In the result, we hold that the reference is liable to be rejected and accordingly, it is rejected. The appeals filed by the condemned prisoner and other two convicts are allowed and the Jail Appeal is accordingly disposed of. Let the condemned prisoner be set at liberty if not wanted in connection with any other case. The other convict-appellants and their sureties are discharged from respective bail bonds.
12
The State ...petitioner -Versus- Subir Kumar Roy alias Babu and 3 others ...condemned-convicts (Absconding)
Accordingly, the reference is accepted in part so far it relates to condemned-convict Subir Kumar Roy. The death penalty awarded upon convict Subir Kuar Roy by the Judge, Nari-o-Shishu Nirjatan Daman Tribunal-1, Sirajganj is hereby confirmed and upheld. Convicts Dr. Sushil Kumar Roy, Sunil Kumar Roy and Monaranjon Roy are found not guilty of the charges leveled against them under sections 11(Ka) and 30 of the Nari-o-Shishu Nirjatan Daman Ain, 2000 and, therefore, they are acquitted of the same. Let the conviction warrant or warrant of arrest issued against Dr. Sushil Kumar Roy, Sunil Kumar Roy and Monaranjon Roy be recalled.
13
The State ..... petitioner -Versus- Md. Abdullah ..... condemned-prisoner
In view of the discussion made hereinabove, we find no legal evidence against the condemned-prisoner to sustain the conviction. Accordingly, the reference is rejected. The Rule issued in Criminal Miscellaneous Case 40470 of 2022 is hereby made absolute. The judgment and order of conviction and sentence passed by the learned Judge of the Tribunal convicting the condemned-prisoner under section 11(Ka) of the Ain, 2000 and sentencing him thereunder to death is hereby set aside. The condemned-prisoner is acquitted of the charge levelled against him.
14
Dayem Khandker... Petitioner and The Governemnt and others
Habeas Corpus matter
15
Mohammad Quyaum and another. -Versus- National Drug Co. Limited and others.
Allowed in part.
16
Bangladesh Finance Limited (formerly known as BD Finance Limited) of 27 Dilkusha Commercial Area, Motijheel, Dhaka and others vs Government of the People of Bangladesh
BD finance Limited Judgment against show cause
17
Md. Salah Uddin vs The Government of Bangladesh
Discharged
18
Md. Afsor Uddin VS The Government of The People’s Republic of Bangladesh
Discharged
19
Md. Taib Hossain-Vs-Government of Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary Ministry of Education and others
Absolute
20
Md. Yousuf Ali Hawlader Vs. Md. Jahidur Rahman Sheikh and others
.
21
The State.-Versus- Md. Alamgir Hossain and others
Rejected
22
Shakhawat Hossain Sohel and others Vs. F.V. Amuse Nowshin and others.
The application for return of the plaint is allowed.
23
Md. Zakir Hossain and another Vs. M.V. CRYSTAL GOLD and others.
Suit decreed
24
Md. Salah Uddin and another VS The Government of Bangladesh
Discharged
25
Niramoy Indu Halder and others Vs.Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Education, Technical and Madrasha Education Division and others
Absolute
26
Sheikh Firoz Ikbal Vs.Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs and others
Absolute
27
Sheikh Mahbub Ikbal Vs.Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs and others
Absolute
28
Sampa Bepari and others Vs.Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Technical and Madrasah Education Division, Ministry of Education Bangladesh and others
Absolute
29
Mohammad Jakir Hossain and others VsGovernment of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Primary and Mass Education and others
Discharged
30
Mohammad Aktaruzzaman-Vs-The Government of Bangladesh, represented by its Secretary, Ministry of Power and Electricity and others
Disposed of with direction
31
Fatema Begum and others ... Defendant-Petitioners -Versus- Government of Bangladesh and others ...Plaintiff-Opposite parties
Discharged
32
Md. Hanif Howlader Vs. md. Ali Reaz Khan and another
Disposed of
33
Md. Roki Chowdhury ... Appellant -Versus- Md. Rezaul Karim and another ... Respondents
The appeal is dismissed
34
Md. Nazmul Haque Bhuiyan versus Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Education, Bangladesh Secretariat, Ramna, Dhaka and others
Discharged
35
SKM Mohsin Reja, Security Supervisor, Service ID No. P-35802, Security Department, Biman Bangladesh Airlines Limited versus Biman Bangladesh Airlines Limited, represented by its Managing Director and Chief Executive Officer (CEO), Head Office, Balaka Bhaban, Kurmitola, Dhaka-1229, Bangladesh and another
Absolute
36
Abdul Malek -Versus- Abdus Sattar Mollah and others
.
37
Md. Delbar Miah -Versus- Mst. Amena Khatoon being dead his heirs- Maleka Begum and others
.
38
Saad Muhammad Hayder -Vs.- Md. Jahangir Alam and Others
Absolute
39
Md. Raihul Karim and othersGovernment of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Primary and Mass Education, Bangladesh Secretariat and others
Discharged
40
Md. Asadul Haque Mamun -Vs- The State
The appeal is allowed and the judgment and order of conviction and sentence dated 01.02.2021 passed by the learned Additional Metropolitan Sessions Judge, 2nd Adalat, Dhaka
41
Md. Sohel Rana -Vs.- The State
Framing charge against the accused-appellant
42
The IBN SINA Polymer Industries Ltd. Vs. The Registrar, Joint Stock Companies and Firms and another.
Allowed.
43
Most. Tanzila Begum-Vs-Superintending Engineer (Management
Disposed of with direction
44
Golok Chandra Mallik @ Mondal and others -Versus- Heirs of late Pachu Mallik @ Mondal:- Kalipada Mallik @ Mondal and others
.
45
The Chittagong Co-Operative Housing Society Limited -Versus- Wahid Malek
.
46
Abdur Rahim and others -Versus- Monsur Ahmed (Kalam) and others
.
47
Proshika Manobik Unnayan Kendra represented by its Chairman Rokeya Islam -Versus- Dr. Qazi Faruque Ahmed
.
48
Md. Rashidunnabi, son of Al-haj Ramzan Ali Sharkar, Proprietor of Trade Engineering, 193, Kabi Jashimuddin Road, Pagar, Tangi, Gazipur/Customs, Excise and VAT Appellate Tribunal, Dhaka and others
Appeal allowed in part.
49
Jacinth Electronics Ltd./National Board of Revenue and others
Absolute
50
M/s. Green World Fashion Ltd./Customs, Excise and VAT Appellate Tribunal, Dhaka and others
Allowed in part
This Site is Visited :