Home : Supreme Court of Bangladesh

1

Criminal Appeal(H) 8058/2024
(Criminal Appeal(H) 8058/2024)

অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 18-OCT-26

Mohammad Obaidullah ...........Convict-Appellant -Versus- The State and another ------- Respondents

Allowed

2

Criminal Appeal(H) 7712/2014
(Criminal Appeal(H) 7712/2014)

অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 18-OCT-26

Md. Omar Faruk ...........Convict-Appellant -Versus- The State and others ------- Respondents

Allowed

3

Criminal Appeal(H) 7665/2024
(Criminal Appeal(H) 7665/2024)

অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 18-OCT-26

Mst. Sumi Rahman..........Convict-Appellant -Versus- The State and another ---- Respondents

Allowed

4

Criminal Appeal(H) 5795/2023
(Criminal Appeal(H) 5795/2023)

অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 18-OCT-26

Md. Mizanur Rahman Suman .........Convict-Appellant -Versus- The State ----- Respondents

Allowed

5

Criminal Appeal(H) 3625/2017
(Criminal Appeal(H) 3625/2017)

অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 18-OCT-26

Abdullah Al Noman ...........Convict-Appellant -Versus- The State ------- Respondent

Allowed

6

Civil Revision 3774/2013
(Civil Revision 3774/2013)

অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 18-OCT-26

Md. Ishaque Ali being dead his legal heirs Md. Mainul Haque and others ...Plaintiff-Petitioners Versus The Additional Deputy Commissioner and others ...Defendant-Opposite parties

Discharged

7

Civil Revision 4686/2004
(Civil Revision 4686/2004)

অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 18-OCT-26

Bangladesh Railway ... Defendant-Petitioner Versus Shafiqul Islam ...plaintiff-Opposite party

Absolute

8

First Appeal 721/2018
(First Appeal 721/2018)

অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 18-OCT-26

Abdul Rezzaque Bhuiyan and others Vs. Abdul Hossain Khan and others

Allowed

9

Civil Revision 4161/2016
(Civil Revision 4161/2016)

অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 18-OCT-26

Md. Monir Chowdhury ... Defendant-Petitioner -Versus- Uttara Bank Limited ... Plaintiff-Opposite Party

Discharged

10

Civil Revision 689/2020
(Civil Revision 689/2020)

অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 18-OCT-26

Jamal Hossain … plaintiff-Petitioner Versus Mabiya Khatun and others ... Defendant-Opposite parties

Discharged

11

Civil Revision 4894/2022
(Civil Revision 4894/2022)

অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 18-OCT-26

Azizul Haque ... Defendant-Petitioner Versus Abdul Gafur and others ... Plaintiff-Opposite parties

Discharged

12

Civil Revision 3343/2009
(Civil Revision 3343/2009)

অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 18-OCT-26

Md. Joydhar Ali … Defendant-Petitioner Versus Karamjan Bibi ... Plaintiff-Opposite Party

Discharged

13

Civil Revision 3164/2013
(Civil Revision 3164/2013)

অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 18-OCT-26

Mst Tohibun Huda … Plaintiff-Petitioner Versus Md Tahmidur Rahman and others ... Defendant-Opposite Parties

Disposed of

14

Criminal Appeal(H) 6867/2018
(Criminal Appeal(H) 6867/2018)

অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 17-OCT-26

Nizam Uddin Mahmud ... Complainant -Appellant -Versus- Nogina Hasin and another ... Accused-Respondents

The appeal is allowed

15

Writ Petition 2334/2018
(Writ Petition 2334/2018)

অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 15-OCT-26

Meherun Nesa and others vs Govt. of Bangladesh

Absolute

16

Civil Revision 2980/2022
(Civil Revision 2980/2022)

অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 15-OCT-26

Md. Joynal Mulla and others vs Golam Mustafa Mridha and others

Absolute

17

Civil Revision 1846/2025
(Civil Revision 1846/2025)

অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 15-OCT-26

Mosharaf Hossain (Musa Mia) and others vs Md. Helal Uddin and others

Disposed of

18

Civil Revision 902/2025
(Civil Revision 902/2025)

অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 15-OCT-26

Most. Shamsun Nahar -Versus- Md. Azizur Rahman Khan and others

Discharged

19

Civil Revision 5617/2024
(Civil Revision 5617/2024)

অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 15-OCT-26

Shahanaz Begum -Versus- Motiur Rahman, being dead, his heirs 1(Ka) Momotaj Begum and others

Absolute

20

Civil Revision 854/2024
(Civil Revision 854/2024)

অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 15-OCT-26

Md. Ibrahim and others vs Md. Fazlur Rahman

The is discharged

21

Civil Revision 1779/2001
(Civil Revision 1779/2001)

অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 15-OCT-26

Nurul Hoque alias Noor Mohammad Howlader The sole petitioner being dead, his heirs are given below: 1(a) Mrs. Anawara Begum alias Alea (Daughter) and others -Versus- Munshi Md. Isahak Ali Howlader, opposite party No. 1 being dead, his heirs are given below: 1(a) Md. Abul Jafar and others

Discharged

22

Company Matter 242/2020
(Company Matter 242/2020)

অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 13-OCT-26

Wilmington Trust Company. -Versus- HG AVIATION LTD. Regent Airways and others.

In exercising its winding-up jurisdiction, the Court must have due regard to the interests of the company as well as those of its creditors. Winding up is undoubtedly a serious remedy and ought not to be ordered where a debt is disputed on substantial and bona fide grounds or the company is experiencing a temporary commercial or financial difficulty. The position, however, is materially different where the debt is established and admitted by the company, remains unpaid, and the company has failed to honour an agreed arrangement/ schedule for its payment. In the present case, the respondent-company has not only acknowledged its liability towards the petitioner but has also entered into an arrangement for payment of the outstanding dues, which it subsequently failed to honour. Its own pleadings further disclose substantial outstanding liabilities to other creditors. In these circumstances, the mere assertion of a possibility of future investment or an improvement in the company’s financial position, without any concrete evidence demonstrating a present or reasonably certain ability to discharge its existing liabilities, cannot by itself constitute sufficient ground for withholding the winding-up order.

23

Company Matter 442/2022
(Company Matter 442/2022)

অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 13-OCT-26

A.F.M. Shahidul Islam Mamun -Versus- Sigma Fashions Ltd. and others.

Winding Up: The Companies Act 1994: i. Mere non-payment of a claimed amount does not invariably establish commercial inability to pay debts. Particularly where the underlying liability is itself bona fide disputed, non-payment cannot, without more, be treated as proof of insolvency or inability to pay within the meaning of section 241(v). ii. The winding-up jurisdiction cannot properly be converted into a forum for deciding such disputed contractual claims. The materials indicate that the goods were delivered to and received by the respondent-company. Such receipt is relevant to the petitioner`s underlying contractual claim, but does not, by itself, establish an unconditional liability for the entire amount claimed, particularly in view of the respondent`s allegations of delayed delivery, non-conformity of goods, consequential loss and adjustment of the claim. Those matters concern contractual liability and may be settled amicably or, failing settlement, determined by the competent forum in accordance with the parties` agreed dispute-resolution mechanism. The fact that some goods may have been delivered after the stipulated date does not, by itself, extinguish the petitioner`s claim; nor does receipt of the goods by the respondent-company, by itself, establish an undisputed debt for the purpose of winding up. iii. Where a petitioner seeks to invoke the statutory deeming provision under section 242(1)(i), compliance with the statutory requirements is essential. The demand must afford the company the period prescribed by law to pay, secure or compound for the debt to the reasonable satisfaction of the creditor. If, as appears from the notice relied upon by the petitioner, Respondent No.1 was called upon to make payment within seven days, such demand cannot be treated as a demand satisfying the statutory requirement of section 242(1)(i). Consequently, the petitioner cannot rely upon the alleged failure to comply with that notice as constituting the statutory basis for deeming the respondent-company unable to pay its debts.

24

Company Matter 157/2023
(Company Matter 157/2023)

অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 13-OCT-26

Sajjad Ahmed Rubel and another -Versus- C.A. Tower Ltd.and others.

Section 43 of the Companies Act 1994 i. An allotment letter, by its very nature, evidences the original allotment or contractual arrangement in respect of the flat; it does not, without more, clearly establish the nature, extent or continuance of the proprietary or shareholding rights claimed by the allottee. The petitioners are required to demonstrate not only that their names appeared in the original allotment letter, but also that such allotment resulted in, and continued to confer upon them, a subsisting and enforceable interest in the flat and the corresponding shares. ii. The allotment letter may establish the position at the stage of the original allotment, but it cannot, standing alone and without any supporting subsequent evidence of subsisting rights, be treated as clear proof of the petitioners’ present title or entitlement to the shares. To hold otherwise would be to disregard the subsequent corporate record and the conduct of the parties over a prolonged period.

25

Company Matter 155/2020
(Company Matter 155/2020)

অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 13-OCT-26

Shaikh Farhana Haque -Versus- Mr. Shaikh Ehsanul Haque and others

Section 43 of the Companies Act 1994 i. The jurisdiction to rectify the register is not confined merely to correcting clerical or accidental errors. Where an entry in the register is alleged to have been made without a valid corporate act or on the basis of a transaction which did not confer a lawful title to the shares, the Court may examine the underlying transaction for the purpose of determining whether the impugned entry ought to remain on the register. ii. The contention of Respondent No.1 that the petitioner waived her pre-emption rights or acquiesced in the allotment also cannot assist him unless the underlying allotment is first shown to have been lawfully made. Acquiescence cannot, by itself, validate an allotment which was not authorised in accordance with law. Nor can an entry made in the Company`s records or subsequently recorded by the Registrar become immune from scrutiny merely because it has remained on record for some period.

26

Criminal Appeal(H) 8072/2025

অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 12-OCT-26

Md. Shakil -Vs- The State

If the witnesses already examined are reliable and the testimony coming from their mouth is unimpeachable the court can safely act upon it uninfluenced by the factum of non-examination of other witnesses.

27

Writ Petition 17727/2017
(Writ Petition)

অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 12-OCT-26

Grameen Kalyan, Grameen Bank Bhaban (8th Floor), Section-2, Mirpur, Dhaka represented by its Managing Director.-Vs-The National Board of Revenue, Rajashya Bhaban, Segunbagicha, Dhaka represented by its Chairman and others.

Discharged

28

Writ Petition 14364/2017
(Writ Petition)

অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 12-OCT-26

Grameen Kalyan, represented by its Managing Director Mr. Md. Imamus Sultan, Grameen Bank Bhaban (8th Floor), Section-2, Mirpur, Dhaka, Bangladesh.-Vs-The National Board of Revenue represented by its Chairman, Rajashya Bhaban, Segunbagicha, Dhaka and others.

Discharged

29

Criminal Misc 33272/2010
(Criminal Misc 33272/2010)

অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 12-OCT-26

Ismail Hossain vs. The state

Rule is made absolute. The proceedings in Complaint Case No. 04 of 2008, under sections 406/420 of the Penal Code, now pending before the Court of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Narayanganj, are hereby quashed.

30

Criminal Revision 1935/2026
(Criminal Revision 1935/2026)

অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 12-OCT-26

Md. Shiblu Hossain vs.The state

Rule is made absolute. The Court concerned is directed to retain only the requisite quantity of the seized rice as samples for evidentiary purposes and to release the remaining rice to the petitioner, namely, Md. Shiblu Hossain, upon execution of a bond of Tk.15,00,000/- (fifteen lakh). In the event that the alleged offence is proved, the amount secured by the bond shall be liable to forfeiture to the Government; otherwise, the bond shall stand discharged to the owner.

31

Criminal Appeal(H) 3081/2026
(Criminal Appeal(H) 3081/2026)

অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 12-OCT-26

Tasmim Mahid Chanchal vs. The state

appeal is dismissed. The accused-appellant is directed to surrender before the learned trial Court within 30 (thirty) days from the date of receipt of this judgment by the learned trial Court, failing which the learned trial Court shall be at liberty to secure his arrest in accordance with law.

32

Criminal Misc 51964/2026
(Criminal Misc 51964/2026)

অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 12-OCT-26

Rubel Kotwal vs. The State

Rule absolute

33

Criminal Misc 51852/2026
(Criminal Misc 51852/2026)

অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 12-OCT-26

Md. Shakawat vs. The state

Rule Absolute

34

Criminal Misc 51854/2026
(Criminal Misc 51854/2026)

অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 12-OCT-26

Md. Shakhawat Hossain @ Showkot vs. The state

Absolute

35

Criminal Revision 2654/2025
(Criminal Revision 2654/2025)

অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 12-OCT-26

Md. Rabiul Islam ... Convict-Petitioner -Versus- The State ...Opposite Party

The Rule is made absolute

36

Civil Revision 633/2009
(Civil Revision 633/2009)

অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 12-OCT-26

Abdur Rashid Patwri and others ........ Petitioners -Versus- Mst. Raihana Begum and others ....... opposite parties

Absolute

37

Writ Petition 12915/2024
(Writ Petition 12915/2024)

অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 12-OCT-26

Nahid Akthar … Petitioner -Versus- The Judge, Artha Rin Adalat, 1st Court, Dhaka and others. … Respondents

Discharged

38

Writ Petition 10505/2025
(.../)

অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 12-OCT-26

Prime Ship Recycling Limited and others … Petitioners -VersusThe Learned Artha Rin Adalat No. 2, Dhaka and another … Respondents

Absolute

39

Criminal Appeal(H) 6464/2024
(Criminal Appeal(H) 6464/2024)

অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 12-OCT-26

Nil Baran Tripura ...Convict-Appellant -Versus- The State and another ...Respondent

The appeal is allowed.

40

Criminal Revision 915/2025

অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 11-OCT-26

Anowar -Vs- The State

It is notable that for grievous hurt there must exist an intention to cause such a hurt or knowledge that such an action would be the natural and probable consequences causing grievous hurt; otherwise, the hurt would be a simple one to cause simple hurt only.

The benefit of doubt must be given to the accused.

In a criminal case, the allegations have no legal value unless reliable and credible witnesses testify to them, and the prosecution must prove them beyond any reasonable doubt.

41

Criminal Revision 3622/2022

অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 11-OCT-26

Iqbal Hossain -Vs- The State and another

Absolute based on the compromise petition.

42

Criminal Revision 6176/2024

অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 11-OCT-26

Mahbuba Mohammad Babon -Vs- The State and another

The demand for money is not even alleged to be made as a consideration of the marriage. Neither money nor any other property can be said to be dowry unless they satisfy the definition of dowry as under the Act.

The language of Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act,1980 is clear and unambiguous, which suggests that the demand of dowry should be made to the parent or guardians of the bride or bridegroom, as the case may be, to bring a person under the dragnet of Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act,1980.

43

Criminal Revision 2309/2016

অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 11-OCT-26

Mst. Rotna Khatun -Vs- The State

From a plain reading of sub-section (1) of section 103 of the Code of Criminal Procedure it is abundantly clear that the search by the Police must be conducted in the presence of at least two respectable inhabitants of the locality and the things which are to be seized in connection with any case are to be seized during the course of such search conducted in presence of at least two respectable local inhabitants. The requirements of sub-section (2) of section 103 read with sub-section (1) of section 103 are that the entire search from the beginning to the end must be conducted in the presence of two respectable local inhabitants and the requirements are not fulfilled if the search and the seizure have taken place either preceding the arrival of the local inhabitants or take place after they departed from the place of search. The provision relating to search and seizure provided in sub-section (1) and sub-section (2) of section 103 of the Code of Criminal Procedure are mandatory, and any search and seizure without strictly complying with the aforesaid provisions must be deemed to be illegal and as such, must be left out of consideration in a criminal trial.

44

Criminal Appeal(H) 120/2024

অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 11-OCT-26

Md. Rashel Uddin - Vs- The State and another

The convict appellant demanded Tk.1,00,000/- for business purpose from his wife (complainant); therefore we are of the firm view that the prosecution failed to prove that the convict appellant demanded money as dowry at the relevant time of the occurrence. Therefore, the alleged demand of money of Tk. 1,00,000/- does not fall within the purview of the definition of dowry contemplated in section 2(ঞ ) of the Ain.

45

Criminal Revision 6587/2024
(Jahor Miah -Vs- The State and another)

অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 11-OCT-26

“The learned Judges of the High Court Division failed to consider that from plain reading of the complaint, it is abundantly clear that it does not disclose any offense against the petitioner and that a normal financial deal between the debtor and creditor does not come within the scope of any offence and as such the impugned judgment and order is liable to be set aside for the ends of justice.”

46

Civil Revision 5219/2024
(Civil Revision 5219/2024)

অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 08-OCT-26

Eakub Ali -Versus- Shanzida Nasrin

The Rule 28 (1) (Ka) of the Muslim marriages and Divorces (Registration) Rules, 2009 formulates a Form for Nikahnama in which columns 13-15 are specifically endorsed with the amount of Mahr. prompt/deferred dowers, and the paid amount of mohrana, respectively, and thereby column 14 is beyond the ambit of the Qur`anic verses unless the bride agrees to the deferred dowers. Consequently, any kind of imposed deferred dower would be considered as prompt dower after being claimed by the wife. Prompt dower must be payable immediately or on demand, according to the terms of the marriage contract and applicable Muslim law, However, I am of the firm view that the wife must not wait until divorce or death to get the dower merely because the Nikahnama contains a dower obligation. The standard position is that prompt dower is a debt owed by the husband to the wife, and that it is an unsecured debt and an actionable claim; it must be paid forthwith, and if a wife has to come to Coult for realization of prompt dower, the trial Court has the discretion to award compensation to the wife on the basis of the facts of its own case, where the husband deferred the dower, having financial capacity.

47

Civil Revision 6171/2022
(Civil Revision 6171/2022)

অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 06-OCT-26

Md. Ahamed Ali and others -Versus- Md. Abul Hossain and others

Discharged

48

Writ Petition 15214/2024
(Writ Petition 15214/2024)

অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 05-OCT-26

Fokhrul Hasan Vs. The Administrator, Sylhet City Corporation, Nagar Bhaban, Sylhet-3100 and others

Disposed of

49

Writ Petition 16666/2025
(Writ Petition 16666/2025)

অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 05-OCT-26

Md. Matiur Rahman and others Vs. Government of Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Public Affairs, Bangladesh Secretariat, P.S-Ramna, District-Dhaka and others

Disposed of

50

Writ Petition 7199/2025
(Writ Petition 7199/2025 with Writ Petition 17114/2025)

অনুবাদ (Google)
Uploaded on : 05-OCT-26

M/S Abdul Malek Enterprise(In writ petition No. 7199 of 2025) and Md. Kibria Helal (In Writ Petition No. 17114 of 2025) Vs.Government of Bangladesh and others

Writ Petition No. 7199 of 2025 is disposed of and Writ Petition No. 17114 of 2025 is made absolute-in-part.