Judgment : High Court Division Full List
 
Case Type
Case/Tender Number
Year
Parties
Short Description
 

Case Number Parties Short Description
751
Omar Ali Sheikh Vs. Abdur Rouf Gazi and others
752
Md. Hasen Ali Vs. Md. Mohsin Ali and others
753
Md. Abdul Gafur and another Vs. Md. Badsha Matbor and others
754
Mossammat Maleka Begum and others Vs. Most. Jarina Begum and others
755
Md. Mahabub Alam and others Vs. Bangladesh represented by the Deputy Commissioner, Dinajpur and others
756
Government of Bangladesh on behalf of land Reforms Board Vs. Jamina Khatun and others
757
The Government of Bangladesh Vs. Md. Abdul Latif Pramanik
758
Trust Bank Limited … Plaintiff-Appellant -VersusMessrs Nabi Steel Industries and others …Defendants-Respondents
759
The United States Missionary Board represented by Mr. Reverend Tapan Kumar Borman ... Plaintiff-Appellant -VersusMd. Abdus Salam (Shahjahan) and others …Defendants-Respondents
760
761
The State Vs. Asfak Ahmed Shihab and others
762
Rohela Leena Choudhury, daughter of Dr. Abdul Bari Laskar and Nur Jahan Laskar of Flat No. B-4, House No. 50, Road No. 1, Block-1, Police Station- Banani, District- Dhaka represented by her constituted attorney Shaifullah Sojib, Gyanda Nagar, Sabgari-6450, Gurudaspur, Natore.-Vs-Abdul Kadir Laskar, son of Dr. Abdul Bari Laskar and Nur Jahan Laskar of Flat No. C-5, House No. 50, Road No. 1, Block-1, Police Station- Banani, District- Dhaka and others.
Disposed of
763
Trust Bank Limited-Vs-Messrs Zardhi Steel and others
Allowed
764
Md. Abdul Mannan and others-Vs-Rupali Bank Limited and others
Absolute
765
Enamul Huq and others Vs. Ohidur Rahman and others
766
Delowara Begum and others Vs. Golam Mohiuddin Hasam and others
767
Abdur Rashid Bepari Vs. Abdul Baten Mridha and others
768
Md. Shah Alam Bhuiyan Vs. Jamuna Bank Ltd and others
769
Bimol Chandra Karmoker Vs. Dilip Karmoker being dead his heirs: 1(a) Palash Kumar Karmaker and others
770
Yunus Ali and others Vs. Md. Sarpat Ali being dead his heirs- Md. Mohir Uddin and others
771
Abdur Rashid and others Vs. Government of Bangladesh
772
Md. Shorifullah Patwary @ Md. Jilan Patwary Vs. Jahee Ali Ajgar and others
773
Chand Mia and another Vs. Md. Ali Ahammad and others
774
Tareq BIn Hasan and others Vs. Md. Muktal Hossain
775
Rahima Khatun Vs. Chattogram Port Authority, Chattogram and others
776
Khan Ashraful Alam Vs. Md. Golam Hossain Khan and others
777
Arun Chandra Bhadra and others Vs. Amar Chandra Dutta and others
778
Bir Muktijodda Sarder abdur Rashid Advocate Vs. Nehal Uddin Mrida Waqf Estate and others
779
Mohiuddin Ahammad and another-Vs-Md. Daulat Miah and others
Absolute
780
Abul Lias @ Abul Haris and others Vs. Aklus Ali and others
781
Md. Abu Jafor Mollah @ Abu Fajor and another Vs. Sree Subash Chandra Sarker and others
782
Kazi Moinul Islam and others Vs. Mrs. Moriom Begum and others
783
Md. Shahidur Rahman Vs. Most. Ranjina Akhter and another
784
Hashem Ali Vs. Sukur Ali
785
Achia Khatun and others Vs. Khalilur Rahman and others
786
Aymona BIbi being dead her heirs 1(a) Jomshed Ali and another Vs. Government of Bangladesh and others
787
Md. Sadek Vs. Sub Divisional Engineer, Noakhali
788
Surobala Nath Vs. 1(a) Norattam Deb Nath and others
789
Most. Nahida Akter and another Vs. Jahera Khatun and others
790
Aminul Hossain Vs. Md. Abdul Baten Miah and others
791
Md. Tayeb Ali being dead his legal heirs_ 1(a) Ms. Sajiron Begum and others Vs. Aftab Uddin being dead his legal heris Md. Mizanur Rahman Bablu and others
792
Rakhal Chandra Majumder Vs. Lalita Bala Majumder and others
793
Ahamad Hossen and others Vs. Hamid Ullah and others
794
Government of Bangladesh Vs. Haji Nurul Haque and others
795
Md. Siddiqur Rahman Vs. Md. Asharaf Hossain and others
796
Prokash Chandra Mondal and others Vs. Narendra Nath Mondal and another
797
Government of Bangladesh Vs. Masud Mia and others
798
1(Ka) Dishad Chowdhury and others Vs. Abdul Quddus and others
799
Md. Abdul Halim Faragi Vs. Shikh Mojibur Rahman
800
Mr. Nazmul Afaq - Vs- Taher Uddin alias Abu Mia and others
“Formal defect” has not been defined anywhere in the Code. However, some suitable authorities believe the expression “formal defect” should receive wide and liberal meaning. Even when a plaintiff cannot withdraw his suit with liberty to sue afresh on the grounds of any “formal defect,” the Court may still allow him to do so on any other ground sufficient for the satisfaction of the Court.
This Site is Visited :