: High Court Division Full List
 
Case Type
Case/Tender Number
Year
Parties
Short Description
 

Case Number Parties Short Description
1
M/S. Ashik Textile Mills Limited represented by the Managing Director Md. Kamrul Islam of Plot No. 27, Ward No. 69, Dailla, Noraibagh, Demra Staff Quarter, Police Station- Demra, District- Dhaka and others.-Vs-Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Law, Justice and Parliamentary Affairs, Bangladesh Secretariat, Dhaka and others
Discharged
2
Atul Chandra Kabiraj Vs. Ful Chand Dhali and others
.
3
Golam Kibria Tapon ... Defendant-Petitioner -Versus- White House Group ... Plaintiffs-Opposite Party
Disposed of
4
Md. Nazrul Islam ... Convict-Appellant -Versus- S. M. Alamgir and another ...Complainant-Respondents
The appeal is dismissed
5
Md. Nazrul Islam ... Convict-Appellant -Versus- S. M. Alamgir and another ...Complainant-Respondents
The appeal is dismissed
6
Md. Nazrul Islam ... Convict-Appellant -Versus- S. M. Alamgir and another ...Complainant-Respondents
The appeal is dismissed
7
Mrs. Shamsun Nahar and others. -VERSUS - Packstone Limited and others.
Dismissed.
8
Mosmmat. Morium Begum. -VERSUS - Marine Flour Mills (Pvt.) Ltd. and others.
Disposed of.
9
Transcom Beverage Limited, represented by its Managing Director. -Versus- TFG International S.r.l., represented by its President Mr. Daniele Pezzani, of Via Cavallotti, 21- 31015 Conegliano (TV) - Italy and others
Disposed of.
10
Dhirendra Kumar Shingha ... Convict-Petitioner -Versus- Krishna Rani Singha and another ...Complainant- Opposite Parties
The Rule is made absolute
11
Abdul Khalek and another Vs. Humayun Miah and others
First Appeal No.132 of 2-020
12
Z
Writ Petition No. 15620 of 2022 is disposed of, Writ Petition No. 3748 of 2021, Writ Petition No. 3749 of 2021 and Writ Petition No. 3750 of 2021 are made absolute
13
Md. Irshad Karim and anohter. -Versus- Registrar of Joint Stock Companies and Frims and others.
Disposed of.
14
Belal Hossain and others Vs. The State and another
Compromise in Section 138 matters.
15
Md. Khorshed Uddin Vs. The State and another
Compromise in Section 138 matters.
16
Md. Saiful Islam. -Vs - Safina Park Ltd. and others.
Disposed of.
17
Md. Jakirul Kayes @ Soeb -vs- The State
PW. 12 is the doctor who examined the victim and issued the injury certificate. This witness, in cross-examination, admitted that he did not mention the patient’s identifier name or registration number in the injury report. Moreover, this witness also admitted that he wrote in the report that the victim was admitted to a ‘‘Male Ward’’ in the hospital. Further, he admitted that the victim’s health condition was not necessary for hospital admission. In view of the above facts and circumstances, we are of the firm view that the injury report issued by the doctor, PW.12, has lost its credibility/authenticity and has no evidential value under Section 45 of the Evidence Act. Notably, a doctor must strictly observe the rules of medical ethics and jurisprudence, as well as have regard to the law of the country, in discharging professional duties. Since the prosecution has failed to prove that the victim received treatment at a hospital specified in the Ain, the charge under section 11(ga) of the Ain against the appellant is barred by the proviso so enumerated in section 32 of the Nari-O-Shisho Nirjatan Daman Ain, 2000.
18
if the cheque is found to have been issued by the drawer and it was dishonored in that event, there has been no scope for the drawer of the cheque to exonerate himself in committing the offense punishable under section 138(1) of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
19
Md. Iqbal Kabir-Vs-The Government of Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary Ministry of Education and others
Absolute
20
Md. Anisur Rahman @ Anis and others Vs. The State
Material contradictions in the prosecution case and application of Section 332 of the Penal Code.
21
Latiful Huda -Vs- The State and another.
Discharged
22
Siraj Mia ... Convict-Appellant-Petitioner -Versus- The State, represented by the Deputy Commissioner, Sylhet ... Respondent-Opposite Party
The Rule is discharged
23
Md. Masum Hossain ... Convict-Petitioner -Versus- The State and another ...Complainant-Opposite Parties
The appeal is dismissed
24
Md. Jamal Uddin ... Convict-Petitioner -Versus- The State and another ...Complainant-Opposite Parties
The Rule is discharged
25
Mawlana Md. Shahab Uddin ... Convict-Petitioner -Versus- The State and another ...Complainant-Opposite Parties
The Rule is discharged
26
Mukti Rani Chakroborti ...Convict-Appellant -Versus- The State and another ...Respondent
The appeal is allowed
27
S.M. Shadat Hossen ... Appellant -Versus- The State and another ... Respondents
The appeal is dismissed
28
Md. Nur Hossain Khan and another VS The Government of Bangladesh and others.
Disposed of with above direction
29
Md. Abul Bashar Molla and others Defendant Nos 29(Ka) to 29 (Cha)-vs- Atabur and others
Absolute
30
Discharged
31
A.B.M. Ashiquzzaman and others-Vs-Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Education and others
Disposed of with direction
32
Md. Sattar Khan being dead his legal heirs- Shahnaz and others Vs. Arafat Mahmud
...
33
Md. Atiqullah Sowdagar and others -Versus- Abdul Ghani being dead substituted by his legal heirs and heiresses Jakia Begum and others
------
34
Md. Anowar Hossain and another VS. House Building Finance Corporation, Zonal Office, Rajshahi and another
First Appeal
35
Md. Jahangir Hossain ... Convict-Petitioner -Versus- Mst. Naznin Sultana and another ...Complainant-Opposite parties.
The Rule is discharged
36
Md. Munsur Ali Pramanik Vs. Most. Rezia Begum and others
Discharged
37
Dr. Shaheda Begum ... Convict-Appellant -Versus- The State and another ...Complainant-Respondents
The Appeal is disposed of
38
Abdul Jalil ... Convict-Petitioner -Versus- The State and another ...Complainant-Opposite Parties
The Rule is discharged
39
Md. Fazlur Rahman … Petitioner -VersusBangladesh Bank and others … Respondents
Absolute
40
Nurul Azim Sohel … Petitioner -Versus- Judge, Artha Rin Adalat No. 1, Dhaka and another … Respondents
Discharged
41
Josimuddin and others Vs. Idris Ali and others
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
This Site is Visited :