Judgment : High Court Division Full List
 
Case Type
Case/Tender Number
Year
Parties
Short Description
 

Case Number Parties Short Description
1
Panmark Impex PIE Ltd. Vs. A.M. ACCORD and others
application rejected, auction confirmed and time extended
2
Md. Alomgir being dead his legal heirs; (a) Ms. Shova Alom and others vs. Banani Property Development Limited, represented by its Managing Director and others
Absolute
3
Md. Ismael Hossein alias Jhontu Karmaker Vs. The Chairman, Jatio Muktijoddha Council and others
Rule is made absolute.
4
Md. Mojibor Rahman VS. Government of Bangladesh represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Liberation War Afairs
Rule is made Absolute.
5
Md. Tofazzal Hossain Bhuiyan alias Tofazzal Hossain Vs. Government of Bangladesh and others
The Rule is made Absolute.
6
Mohammad Arman Ali Vs. The Secretary, Ministry of Religious Affairs and Others
Rule is discharged as being in-fructuous.
7
Md. Abdul Kadir being dead his legal heirs: Mst. Sona Banu and others versus Md. Amanulla and others
Allowed
8
Md. Rasel Akon -Versus- The State
9
Md. Gias Mahmud -Versus- The State and another
10
A.K.M. Anower Hossain Vs. Most. Badrunnesa (Aleya) and others
11
Ahad Ali Biswas vs. Samsur Rahman and others
Absolute
12
Md. Amzad Hossain alias Amzad Ali, -Versus- Md. Rafiqul Islam and others.
Discharged
13
Samir Uddin. -Versus- Anowar Ali and others.
14
Gopal Chandra Debnath. -Versus- Rakhal Chandra Debnath being dead his legal heirs Raton Dev Nath and others.
Discharged
15
Md. Khairul Islam Lebu. -Versus- Mrs. Rupali Akter Rupa and another.
Discharged
16
Md. Zalal Uddin Bhuiyan -Vs- Md. Samim Uddin Bhuiyan and others
The Order IX Rule 13 of the Code of Civil Procedure provides that an ex parte decree can be set aside on two grounds: (I) that the summons was not duly served or (II) that any sufficient cause prevented him from appearing when the suit was called on for hearing.
17
Sub-rule 2 of rule 9 of Order 22 of the code allows an abatement to be set aside despite a delay in making an application in time if it can be shown that the applicant was prevented by sufficient cause from continuing the action. At the same time, section 5 of the Limitation Act has been specifically made applicable to the condonation of delay. As a logical sequel, an abetment can be set aside at any time, even beyond the period prescribed for making an application in that behalf if sufficient cause is shown to explain the delay. when there has already been a decree determining the rights of the parties, finally, there is no question of any right to sue surviving. If the right to sue has already culminated and merged into a decree of the Court, and the Suit has also come to an end to that extent, then the terms of Order 22, rule 3 or 4 of the Code of Civil Procedure are not at all applicable.
18
Md. Ruhul Amin Khandokar and others-Vs-Sarafat Ali being dead his legal heirs; 1(a) Renuara Begum and others
Absolute
19
Md. Showkat Ali Sardar Vs. Joint District Judge, 2nd Court, and Artha Rin Adalat, Naogaon and others.
Discharged.
20
Shafiqul Islam Vs. Bangladesh Bank and others.
Discharged
21
Sachindananda Sen Gupta ,FCA VS. Secretary, Ministry of Land and others.
Absolute
22
South Atlantic Shipping Ltd., Owners of the vessel M.V. S. Atlantic. ............ Plaintiff -VERSUS- Honour Ship Management Ltd. and others. .....…Defendants
23
Shapoorji Pallonji Forbes Shipping Limited. ............ Plaintiff -VERSUS- Ministry of Fisheries and Livestock and others. .....…Defendants
24
Md. Ashique Hossain Asha ... Defendant-Respondent-Petitioner. -Versus- Mosa. Kaniz Fatima Tumpa ... Plaintiff-Appellant-Opposite party.
The Rule is discharged
25
Mst. Rijiya Begum and others Vs. Government of Bangladesh and others
Rule is made absolute.
26
Md. Nur Alam and others Vs. Most. Shamsun Nahar being dead her legal heirs- Md. Nurul Iman Dula and others
27
Ayesha Begum and others ... Plaintiffs-Appellants-Petitioners -Vs- Mohammad Hanif and others … Defendants-Respondents-Opposite Parties
The rule is made absolute
28
Anwar Denim Limited Vs. Secretary, Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources, Bangladesh Secretariat, Ramna, Dhaka and others.
Disposed of with direction.
29
AT
Disposed of with direction.
30
Mohammad Riaz Hossain Khan and others-Vs-Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh represented by the Deputy Commissioner, Dhaka, Dhaka Collectorate Bhaban, Police Station- Kotwali, District- Dhaka and others.
Discharged
31
Md. Rafiqul Islam Vs. The Government of Bangladesh and others
Absolute
32
Hafez Md. Abdul Halim ... Defendant-Appellant-Petitioner. -Versus- Most. Rupali Khatun
The Rule is discharged
33
Md. Ismail, being dead his legal heirs: 1.(Kha) Abdul Mabud and another. -Versus- Omar Khair, being dead his legal heirs: 1(a) Nurul Alam and others.
Discharged
34
Md. Mofazzal Hossain.-Versus- Md. Monirul Islam
Discharged
35
Md. Abdul Halim Miah. -Versus- Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh, being represented by the Deputy Commissioner, Faridpur, Police-Station and District-Faridpur.
Discharged
36
Md. Parvej Hossain. -Versus- Mst. Shohana Shohgi.
Discharged
37
Kumarkhali Adibasi Kallyan Bahumukhi Samobay Samiti Ltd., represented by its president. -Versus- Md. Tuhin Biswas and another.
Discharged
38
Md. Abdul Jabber Gazi. -Versus- Abdur Rashid Howlader and others.
Absolute
39
Md. Nuru Mia and others. -Versus- Abdul Mannan alias Md. Mannan being dead his legal heirs Oli and others.
Discharged
40
Suo Motu Vs. Ministry of Local Government, Rural Development and Co-operatives.
Absolute
41
Eshak Miah being dead his heirs: (1) Mosammoth Rehana Begum and others vs.Safia Khatoon being dead his heirs: (2) Habibur Rahman and others
Discharged
42
Ms. Bizli Transport Agency Vs. Sec. Ministry of Housing and Public Works and others.
Discharged
43
Md. Monjurul Islam Vs. Bangladesh Bank and others.
Discharged
44
Ranjit Kumar Das and others. Vs. Sec. Ministry of Housing and PUblic Works and others.
Absolute
45
Md. Emdadul Haque Sarker Vs. Bangladesh Bank and others.
discharged
46
Mohammad Younus Vs. Bangladesh Bank and others.
discharged
47
Md. Harunur Rashid Vs. Sec. Ministry of Finance and others.
discharged
48
Md. Fokrul Islam Vs. Islami bank Bangladesh and others.
discharged
49
Quazi Nasibul Hasan alias Sannu Vs. Judge, Artha Rin Adalat, Dhaka and others.
discharged
50
Nipun Enterprise Vs. Sec. Ministry of Primary and Mass Education and others.
discharged.
This Site is Visited :