Judgment : Appellate Division Full List
 
Case Type
Case/Tender Number
Year
Parties
Short Description
 

Case Number Parties Short Description
251
Hosneara Begum, Advocate Vs A.K.M. Bahauddin alias Bahar and others
252
Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Law, Justice and Parliamentary Affairs, Bangladesh Secretariat, Ramna, Dhaka and others Vs Shah Jamal Mollah and another
253
Kazi Rafiqul Islam Vs Md. Anwar Hossain Advocate and another
254
The Government of Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Law, Justice and Parliamentary, Bangladesh Secretariat, Dhaka Vs S.M. Abdur Rauf and another
255
Government of Bangladesh represented by the Secretary, Finance Department, Ministry of Finance, Bangladesh Secretariat Building, P.S.Shahabagh, Dhaka and others Vs Md. Salim Khan
256
Managing Director, Rupali Bank Ltd., Head Office, Dhaka Vs Md. Shahrier Perves and others
257
Government of Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Works, Bangladesh Secretariat, Ramna Dhaka
258
Rana Surong Vs Government of Bangladesh and others:
259
Khalishpur Jute Mills Ltd. Vs Rajdhani Unnayan Kartipakkha
260
National Bank Limited and another Vs M.R. Trading Company, represented by Alhaj Md. Mizanur Rahman and others
261
The State Vs. Professor Dr. Morshed Hasan Khan
262
Mrs. Jahanara Hossain and others VS Surajit Kumar Das and others
263
Election Commissoin for Bangladesh VS Md. Golam Mostafa and others
264
The Public Service Commission VS Ripon Chandra Shil and others
265
Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujib Medical University VS Dr. Zahidul Haq
266
Mohammad Alauddin
267
Md. Hafizuddin Vs. Mozaffor Mridha being dead his heirs:
268
Secretary, Ministry of Housing and Public Works, Government of Bangladesh, Bangladesh Secretariat, Dhaka
269
Monjur Morshed Khan and others Vs. Durnity Daman Commission(Anti Corruption Commission)and another
270
Parmalundra Joydhar Vs. Bhagirath Talukder and others
271
Biman Bangladesh Airlines and others Vs. Al Rojoni Enterprise
272
Bangladesh Railway, Dhaka Vs. Most. Monowara Begum and others
273
Government of Bangladesh and Allama Delwar Hossain Sayedee =Versus= Allama Delwar Hossain Sayedee and The Chief Prosecution (ICT)
274
Dr. Khairun Nahar and others vs Professor Dr. Iqbal Arshalan
275
Government of Bangladesh and others vs Advocate Asaduzzaman Siddiqui and others
276
Mohammad Zafar Iqbal and others: VS Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary of the Ministry of Liberation War Affairs, Bangladesh Secretariat, Ramna, Dhaka and others:
277
Bangladesh Bank vs East West Property Developments (Pvt.) Limited and others
278
Ataur Mridha @ Ataur vs The State
279
Government of Bangladesh represented by Secretary, Ministry of Finance, Bangladesh Secretariat, Ramna, Dhaka vs Rangamati Food Products Ltd. and others:
280
Bangladesh Bar Council, represented by its Chairman, Dhaka Vs. A.K.M. Fazlul Kamir and others
281
M/S. Gramsico Limited vs Bangladesh Textile Mills Corporation
282
Sohrab Ali Miah and others vs Bangladesh Sugar and Food Industries Corporation and another
283
Mufti Abdul Hannan Munshi alias Abul Kalam and another vs The State
Mufti Abdul Hannan Munshi alias Abul Kalam and another vs The State
284
Criminal Appeal No. 81 of 2016
Mufti Abdul Hannan Munshi alias Abul Kalam and another vs The State
285
The Vice Chancellor, University of Dhaka and others vs A.K.M.Muid and others
The Vice Chancellor, University of Dhaka and others vs A.K.M.Muid and others
286
Abdullah Chowdhury and others vs Janata Bank Ltd. and others
Abdullah Chowdhury and others vs Janata Bank Ltd. and others
287
Banichitra Pratisthan Limited and others VS Bilkis Begum and others
288
Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Law, Justice and Parliamentary Affairs and others vs. Bangladesh Legal Aid and Services Trust (BLAST) represented by Dr. Shahdeen Malik and others
Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Law, Justice and Parliamentary Affairs and others vs. Bangladesh Legal Aid and Services Trust (BLAST) represented by Dr. Shahdeen Malik and others
289
Bangladesh, represented by the Cabinet Secretary, Cabinet Division, Bangladesh Secretariat, Dhaka. vs. Md. Ataur Rahman and others
Bangladesh, represented by the Cabinet Secretary, Cabinet Division, Bangladesh Secretariat, Dhaka. vs. Md. Ataur Rahman and others
290
Civil Appeal 36/2011
291
President, Bangladesh Garments Manufacturers and Exporters Association(BGMEA) Vs. Bangladesh
The BGMEA has constructed a fifteen storied commercial complex on the “BegunBari Khal” and “Hatir jheel lake” which is natural waterbody (cÖvK…wZK Rjvavi) as has been specifically admitted in the schedule to the transfer deed, Annexure-K-2 as well as in the government record and in the Master Plan of the Dhaka City, as Lake/Jolashoy/Doba. As such from the above provision of law, the class or the nature and character of the same cannot be changed nor can be used in any other manner/purpose nor can the same be leased out, rented or transferred by any body. The law further provides that any person changing the nature and character of such “Joladhar” (water body),in violation of section 5 of the said Act of 2000, shall be dealt with in accordance with law as provided in section 8. Since BGMEA has constructed the multi-storied commercial building upon the said waterbody in violation of the law such illegal construction/obstruction must be demolished for which the BGMEA or any other person, notwithstanding anything contained in any other law, cannot claim any compensation as provided in Section8(2) of the Joladhar Ain 2000. ..........................................The petitioner is directed to demolish the building namely, “BGMEA Complex” situated on the waterbody of “Begunbari khal” and “Hatirjheel lake” at once, at its own costs, in default the RAJUK is directed to demolish the same within 90 days from the date of receipt of this judgment and realize the entire demolition costs from the petitioner, BGMEA.
292
Civil Appeal 8/2012
Civil Appeal 8/2012
293
Civil Review Petition 189/2015
294
Civil Appeal 83/2007
295
The State Vs. Advocate Md. Qamrul Islam, M.P. Minister, Ministry of Food and another
We are unable to accept the unconditional apology offered by the contemnors taking into consideration that the contemnors are sitting Cabinet Ministers holding constitutional posts. They are oath bound to preserve and protect the Constitution. The impugned statements/comments/remarks made by them apparently show that they made those comments intentionally with the object of maligning and undermining the office of the Chief Justice and the highest Court of the country. Their statements are so derogatory and contemptuous that if they are let off any person will be emboldened to make similar statements/remarks/comments interfering with the administration of justice and also undermining the authority of this Court in the estimation of the people in general. The prayer for unconditional apology is, therefore, refused. The contemnors are found guilty of gross contempt of this Court.
296
Mir Quasem Ali vs The Chief Prosecutor, International Crimes Tribunal, Dhaka Bangladesh
Mir Quasem Ali vs The Chief Prosecutor, International Crimes Tribunal, Dhaka Bangladesh
297
Wagachara Tea Estate Ltd vs. Muhammad Abu Taher and others
Wagachara Tea Estate Ltd vs. Muhammad Abu Taher and others
298
Chairman, Rajdhani Unnayan Kartipakkha (RAJUK), Dhaka VS Manzur Ahmed @ Manzoor Ahmed and others
Civil Appeal 81/2014 with Civil Appeal 82/2014, Civil Appeal 83/2014, Civil Review Petition 120/2014 and Criminal Petition 480/2015
299
Mir Quasem Ali v. The Chief Prosecutor, International Crimes Tribunal, Dhaka Bangladesh
300
Motiur Rahman Nizami vs The Chief Prosecutor, International Crimes Tribunal, Dhaka Bangladesh.
This Site is Visited :