|
Case Number
|
Parties |
Short Description |
151 |
Writ Petition 7890/2020
অনুবাদ (Google)
|
Kawsar Ahmad and another Vs. The Government of the Peoples Republic of Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Housing and Public Works, Bangladesh Secretariat, Ramna, Dhaka-1000 and others. |
|
152 |
Writ Petition 15089/2017
অনুবাদ (Google)
|
Eftekharul Alam Vs. Bangladesh represented by the Secretary Ministry of Law, Justice and Parliamentary Affairs, Bangladesh Secretariat, Shahbag, Dhaka and others |
|
153 |
Criminal Misc 16259/2017
অনুবাদ (Google)
|
Md. Nobi Hossain and another Vs. The State and another |
|
154 |
Criminal Appeal(H) 5498/2012
অনুবাদ (Google)
|
Md. Abul Kalam alias Abul Kalam Vs. The State and another |
|
155 |
Criminal Misc 33602/2018
অনুবাদ (Google)
|
Abdul Momin Majumder Vs. The State and another |
|
156 |
Writ Petition 10928/2019 (/)
অনুবাদ (Google)
|
Human Rights and Peace for Bangladesh (HRPB) represented by its Secretary-in-Charge, Advocate Md. Sarwar Ahad Chowdhury, Hall No. 2, Supreme Court Bar Association Bhaban, Dhaka, Bangladesh and others -Vs-Bangladesh represented by the Cabinet Secretary, Cabinet Division, Bangladesh Secretariat, Police Station- Ramna, Dhaka, Bangladesh and others. |
It is hereby declared that section 41(1) plL¡¢l Q¡L¢l BCe, 2018 (Act
No. 57 of 2018) published in the Official Gazette on 14.11.2018 and made
effective on 01.10.2019 by virtue of S.R.O No. 305-Ain/2019 dated
25.09.2019 (Annexure-‘A’ to the writ petition) void and ultra vires Articles
26, 27 and 31 of the Constitution of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh. |
157 |
Criminal Misc 49766/2021 (Criminal Misc 49766/2021)
অনুবাদ (Google)
|
Professor Muhammad Yunus @ Professor Dr. Muhammad Yunus Vs. The State |
Bangladesh Labor Ain, 2006:
In view of above specific allegations of violations we are unable to find any substance in the submissions of the learned Advocate for the petitioner that if above complaint is taken in its face value and accepted as true in its entirety even then no prima facie case of violations of above provisions of Bangladesh Labor Ain, 2006 against the GTC is made out.
....
The learned Advocate for the petitioner repeatedly submits that the GTC is a nonprofit company and registered under Section 28 of Companies Act. As such GTC is not liable to contribute 5% of the net profit to the Labor Welfare Fund. In support of above submission the learned Advocate produced the Memorandum and Articles and Association of the GTC. But there is no mention in above Memorandum that the GTC is a nonprofit company. On the contrary Article 71 of above Memorandum shows that GTC may earn profit but the profit shall be utilized for the advancement of the objectives as stated in the above Memorandum. Since the GTC is a profit earning company it is not understandable as to why the company will not contribute a very insignificant part of its net profit for the welfare of its labors. There is nothing in Section 28 of the Companies Act which exempts any Company registered under above provision from making above contribution to the Labor Welfare Fund.
.....
The learned Advocate for the petitioner mentions that this case does not have a date of occurrence and the case is barred by limitation as the same has not been filed within six months as provided in Section 314 of the Bangladesh Labor Ain, 2006. The alleged violations were first detected by the complainant on 09.02.2020. He issued a letter to the GTC for taking remedial measures. No satisfactory reply having received a second inspection was held on 16.08.2021 and again the same violations were discovered. This Complaint was filed in the concerned labor court on 28.08.2021. As such, it prima facie appears that this case has a date of occurrence and the same has been filed within six months from the date of occurrence as provided in Section 314 of Bangladesh Labor Ain, 2006. Moreover it is well settled that a question of limitation is a mixed question of law and facts which can be determined on consideration of evidence to be adduced at trial. |
158 |
Writ Petition 11947/2021
অনুবাদ (Google)
|
Md. Salim Khan, Chairman, 10 No. Lakkhipur Union Parishad, Chandpur Sadar Upozilla, Chandpur, son of late Abdul Hye Khan of Ramdashdi Road, Puran Bazar, Police Station District-Chandpur and others vs. Government of Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Land, Bangladesh Secretariat Building, Police Station-Shahabag, Dhaka, and others |
Chandpur Science and Technology University |
159 |
Writ Petition 4437/2021
অনুবাদ (Google)
|
Tafsir Mohammad Awal Vs The Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Security Services Division, Ministry of Home Affairs, Secretariat, Bhaban Bangladesh Secretariat, Ramna, Dhaka-1000 and others. |
|
160 |
Criminal Revision 150/2020
অনুবাদ (Google)
|
Durnity Daman Commission Vs Md. Sayruddin Ahammad @ Shoiruddin Ahmed and another |
|
161 |
Writ Petition 3251/2020 (Writ Petition 3251/2020)
অনুবাদ (Google)
|
Md. Ziaur Rahman and others Vs. The Government of Bangladesh and others |
In respect of the seniority of employees of Bangladesh Power Development Board. |
162 |
Criminal Misc 15917/2015
অনুবাদ (Google)
|
Khandaker Abdus Sabur-Vs-Jamsher Ali and others |
|
163 |
Writ Petition 10454/2007
অনুবাদ (Google)
|
Upendra Mohan Bosak Vs Bangladesh and others |
|
164 |
Criminal Misc 35027/2022
অনুবাদ (Google)
|
Abdul Malek Vs The State |
|
165 |
Criminal Revision 1734/2019
অনুবাদ (Google)
|
Md. Abdul Momin Vs The State and others |
|
166 |
Writ Petition 155/2020
অনুবাদ (Google)
|
Mrs. Shahela Nazmul Vs Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh, represented by its Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs, Bangladesh Secretariat, Ramna, Dhaka and others. |
|
167 |
Writ Petition 6745/2014
অনুবাদ (Google)
|
Ideal Co-operative Society Limited represented by H.N.M Safiqur Rahman Vs Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh and others. |
|
168 |
Criminal Revision 2963/2019
অনুবাদ (Google)
|
Durnity Daman Commission Vs Md. Aourangageb Siddiquee (Nannu) and another |
|
169 |
Criminal Misc 15445/2010
অনুবাদ (Google)
|
Saleh Ahmed Vs The State and another |
|
170 |
Criminal Revision 2962/2019
অনুবাদ (Google)
|
Durnity Daman Commission Vs Syed Md. Hossain Imam Faruk (S.M.H.I. Faruk) and another |
|
171 |
Criminal Revision 2964/2019
অনুবাদ (Google)
|
Durnity Daman Commission Vs Muhammad Shawkat Ali alias Md. Shawkat Ali and another |
|
172 |
Criminal Misc 53717/2018 (/)
অনুবাদ (Google)
|
Md. Saidul Kabir @ Mukul @ Saidur Kabir and others vs The State and another |
|
173 |
Writ Petition 6290/2017
অনুবাদ (Google)
|
Aziz Co-operative Commerce and Finance Credit Society Ltd. represented by Tajul Islam Vs. Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs, Bangladesh Secretariat, Ramna, Dhaka-1000 and others |
|
174 |
Death Reference 103/2016 (Death Reference 103/2016)
অনুবাদ (Google)
|
The State VS Md. Rafiqul Islam and others |
|
175 |
Civil Revision 3653/2010
অনুবাদ (Google)
|
Md. Meraj Miah Vs. Mossammat Alufa Khatun and others |
|
176 |
Criminal Revision 2215/2017
অনুবাদ (Google)
|
Md. Shahadat Islam and another Vs. The Anti-Corruption Commission and another |
|
177 |
Criminal Misc 5245/2018
অনুবাদ (Google)
|
Professor Dr. Abul Khair Vs. The State and another |
|
178 |
Civil Revision 1253/2019
অনুবাদ (Google)
|
Rokeya Haider VS Hasan Shareef Ahmed and others |
• Document, documentary evidence, secondary evidence and marking of such evidences.
• Notarized photocopy cannot be admitted in evidence and marked as exhibits unless prior notice under Section 66 of the Evidence Act, 1872 is given to the party in custody/ possession of the originals to produce the same. |
179 |
First Misc Appeal 76/2021
অনুবাদ (Google)
|
Asian Consumer Care (Pvt.) Limited, represented by its Director, Rakesh Kumar Agrawal of South Breeze Square (5th Floor), 52 Gulshan Avenue, Gulshan, Dhaka-1212. VS Marico Limited |
• “Mark” and “Trade Mark” clarified.
• The goodwill of a product having customer connection is protected under the trade mark law. However, such protection cannot be given in respect of a particular colour or shape of bottle if it is found that such colour or shape has already acquired a common use in respect of a particular type of products.
• The test in a passing-off case is to determine whether the alleged product is confusingly similar. |
180 |
Writ Petition 11455/2018
অনুবাদ (Google)
|
হিউম্যান রাইটস এন্ড পিস ফর বাংলাদেশ বনাম বাংলাদেশ ও অন্যান্য |
|
181 |
First Appeal 589/2018
অনুবাদ (Google)
|
Jahanara Begum died her heirs- Md. Asraf Hossain alias Babul and others VS Monira Begum and others |
• A ‘pardanashin lady’ in our sub-continental social context is a lady who lives secluded life and deals with the external world from behind her pardah or screen with any male person except a few male relations.
• The lady in question was educated and employed under the family planning department and as such she was not a pardanashin lady as understood in our social context. |
182 |
First Misc Appeal 178/2019
অনুবাদ (Google)
|
Md. Mostafizur Rahman VS Ms. Amin Maria and others |
• The term “Arbitration Agreement” under Section 2(n) read with the explanation to Section 9 of the Arbitration Act, 2001 may, in a given context, refer to a relationship between parties beyond the said agreement.
• A reference in a written contract as regards a document containing arbitration clause itself may constitute an arbitration agreement. |
183 |
Criminal Misc 11219/2011
অনুবাদ (Google)
|
Anti-Corruption Commission Vs. The State and others |
|
184 |
Criminal Revision 1525/2022
অনুবাদ (Google)
|
Durnity Daman Commission Vs. Ismail Chowdhury Samrat and others |
|
185 |
Writ Petition 3829/2019
অনুবাদ (Google)
|
Md. Atiqur Rahman, Director, Jamuna Bank Limited and Chairman, Standard Group Limited and Standard Stitches Limited and another Vs. Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Law, Justice and Parliamentary Affairs and others. |
|
186 |
Writ Petition 1087/2019
অনুবাদ (Google)
|
Standard Stitches Limited, represented by its Chairman Md. Atiqur Rahman and another Vs. Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Law, Justice and Parliamentary Affairs and others. |
|
187 |
Civil Revision 1173/2021
অনুবাদ (Google)
|
Mrs. Mohsina Rahman Vs. A.K.M. Zakaria Hossain Chowdhury and another |
• “Party” in arbitration agreement has been clarified.
• In view of the development-agreements in question, the term ‘party’ in an arbitration proceeding has to be given an extended meaning in view of the provisions under Section 2 of the Arbitration Act, 2001 and as such the term ‘party’ shall include the purported real owner behind the scene. |
188 |
Civil Revision 1091/2020
অনুবাদ (Google)
|
Dr. Muntassir Uddin Khan Mamoon alias Muntassir Mamoon Vs. Begum Munnujan Sufian (M.P.) and others |
• If a relief sought in plaint is apparently barred by limitation, such relief may be struck-out on an application under Order VII, rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure. |
189 |
In re : Writ Petition 2696/2022
অনুবাদ (Google)
|
Mohammad Shishir Manir and others Vs. Chairman, Anti-Corruption Commission and others. |
|
190 |
Criminal Revision 2072/2021
অনুবাদ (Google)
|
Durnity Daman Commission Vs. Dr. S.M. Nazmul Huq and another |
|
191 |
Writ Petition 5508/2017
অনুবাদ (Google)
|
মোহাম্মদ জহিরুল ইসলাম বনাম বাংলাদেশ সরকার ও অন্যান্য |
|
192 |
First Appeal 209/2016
অনুবাদ (Google)
|
Accom Travels and Tours Limited, represented by its authorized person Md. Humayun Kabir Vs. Oman Air S.A.O.C and others. |
Larger Bench Decision (Arbitration Matter):
• In view of the provisions under Sections 3(1) and 3(2) of the Arbitration Act 2001, the provisions of the said Act, except the provisions under Sections 45, 46 and 47, are not applicable in respect of an arbitration where the seat of such arbitration is in a foreign country. Thus, the provisions under Sections 7, 7A and 10 cannot be invoked in such a case except that the power of the Court concerned to take interim measures under Section 7A of the said Act may only be invoked at the stage of enforcement of foreign arbitral award.
• In spite of such non-applicability, the Court below should have stayed the further proceedings of the said suit in exercise of its inherent power under Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908; |
193 |
First Appeal 207/2013
অনুবাদ (Google)
|
Sadrul Huq being dead his legal heirs Ziaul Haque and others. VS Farhana Firdousi and another. |
• Anyone can undertake to pay dower on behalf of husband in Muslim marriage;
• Any valid property, cash or valuables may take the form of dower under Muslim Law;
• Landed properties may be recovered as dower by filing suit before the Family Court as established under the Family Court Ordinance, 1985. |
194 |
Civil Revision 2742/2019
অনুবাদ (Google)
|
South East Bank Limited VS Md. A.S. M Rubaiyat Forman and others. |
• The interest of auction purchaser pre-exists the auction sale and as such he is entitled to challenge auction sale under Order XXI, rule 90 of the Code of Civil Procedure to correct any mistake or fraudulent act. |
195 |
Civil Revision 545/2021
অনুবাদ (Google)
|
Md. Anower Hossain VS M.A. Nasir and others. |
• Civil revision not maintainable against interlocutory orders passed by the Vested Property Return Tribunal or Appellate Tribunal;
• Single bench decision in Surotunnessa case, 68 DLR-463 on maintainability of civil revision is not correct. |
196 |
Writ Petition 14068/2019 (W.P 14669 of 2019 with WP14861 of 2019 with 14862 of 2019 with WP 14863 of 2019 .....)
অনুবাদ (Google)
|
A.S.M. Mahadi Hassan Vs. The Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh and others |
|
197 |
Writ Petition 2480/2019
অনুবাদ (Google)
|
Dr. Shahidul Alam Vs. Bangladesh represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs and others. |
|
198 |
Writ Petition 6377/2016
অনুবাদ (Google)
|
Dipok Guho Roy and another vs. the Government of Bangladesh and others |
Regarding the application of the limitation Act in filing application under Section 10(1) of the Arpita Shampatti Prattarpan Ain, 2001. |
199 |
Criminal Appeal(H) 3537/2009 (Criminal Appeal(H) 3537/2009)
অনুবাদ (Google)
|
Haji Md. Salim (Ex. M.P.) - Versus- The State and another |
Conviction and Sentence Under Section 27(1) of the দুর্নীতি দমন কমিশন আইন, ২০০৪. |
200 |
Writ Petition 13604/2018
অনুবাদ (Google)
|
Md. Moshiar Rahman vs. Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Public Administration, Bangladesh Secretariat, Ramna, Dhaka and others |
Regarding to ascertain the age of the petitioner who is a government employee on the basis of the Secondary School Certificate. |