Judgment : High Court Division Full List
 
Case Type
Case/Tender Number
Year
Parties
Short Description
 

Case Number Parties Short Description
101
Hazera Begum and others vs. Md. Shafiqul Islam and others
Amendment of plaint
102
Md. Abu Sufian Vs. Nasira Sultana Shammi
Discharged.
103
Sohel Vs. The State
104
Md. Kamal Mia Vs. Md. Abul Kashem and others.
Discharged.
105
Md. Saher Ali and others. Vs. Keramot Kazi and others.
Disposed of.
106
Md. Shafiqul Islam Vs Md. Rafiqul Islam and others.
Disposed of.
107
Dulal Krishno Dewari and others Vs. Abdul Sattar being dead his heirs- Abdul Ahad and others
108
Md. Liton Mia vs- The state
Absolute
109
Ferdousi Amin Mithun and others ...Petitioners -Versus- Abdul Sabur and others …Opposite Parties
110
Md. Bazlur Rahman and others ...Plaintiff-petitioners -Versus- Md. Abu Bakkar Siddique alias Lalu and another …Defendant-opposite parties
111
Md. Meinul Hossen and others vs. M.T. FADL-E-RABBI and others
DECREED-IN-PART
112
Al-Safa Tower Ltd. ....Petitioner -Versus- B.N.S. Read Estate Ltd. and others ….Opposite parties
113
Tapan Chandra Shill Vs. Gopal Chandra Shill and others
114
Abu Hanif Vs. The State
116
Md. Jamal Hossain Bhuiyan vs. The Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Finance, Internal Resources Division, Government of the People`s Republic Bangladesh, Segunbagicha, Police Station-Ramna, Dhaka, and others
Absolute
117
Md. Fakhrul Alam vs. Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs, Bangladesh Secretariat, Ramna, Dhaka and others
Discharged
118
Md. Abuzar Gaffari -Versus- The State and another
119
Akabbar @Ali Akbar and another Vs. The State
120
Md. Haider Ali and others -Versus- Md. Ahmad Ali Dewan and others
Absolute
121
Prince Builders Limited and another Opposite party nos. 9 and 10-Appellants -VersusNajmun Nahar and others Applicants-Respondents
The appeal is allowed.
122
The State Vs. Md. Kamrul Islam Dhali
123
The State Vs. Azim Uddin
124
Ms. Momtaj Begum (Ruma) vs. the State and another
Absolute
125
Md. Ansar Ali, being dead, his legal heirs: Md. Barek Ali and others. Vs Md. Md. Abu Bakar Siddique and others.
When a suit is barred by law, the court can dismiss the suit under Order 7 Rule 11 and also take recourse to section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure.
126
Md. MOtiyar Rahman @ Moti being dead his heirs- Mst. Fenci Begum and others Vs. Md. Abdul Gani and others
127
Rupali Bank Limited, Narsingdi Branch, Dhaka Vs. Md. amjad Hossain Bhuiyan
Discharged
128
Md. Jane Alam vs The state
Absolute
129
Khaleda Parvin Vs. Government of Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Education, Dhaka
Absolute
130
Md. Ismail Hossain and another -Versus- The Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Secondary and Higher Education Division, Ministry of Education, Secretariat Building, Ramna, Dhaka and others,
131
Ahmmed Nabi Chowdhury Vs. Bangladesh Bank Others.
132
Md. Nizam Uddin vs the state and another
133
Md. Rahat Ali being dead his legal heirs: 1(Ka) Karamat Ali and others vs. Md. Vadu Pramanik being dead his legal heirs: 1(Ka) Abu Musa and others
Discharged
134
Nargis Akter and others vs.Sayed Mahbub-E-Jamil
Discharged
135
Md. Omar Faruque Khan-Vs-Zonal Manager, Bangladesh House Building Finance Corporation Zonal Office, Zone-1, 1046 Khan A Sabur Road, Power House Moor, Sadar, Khulna and others
Discharged
136
Md. Iftekar Ahmod Sakil, being Minor represented by his father, Md. Hussain Ahmod Lokus and another … Defendants-Appellants. -VersusMd. Abdul Basit and others …Plaintiffs-Respondents.
The appeal is dismissed
137
The above considerations in the light of the relevant case-law lead to the following enunciations: (1) that the necessity of making a second demand, called the talab-i-istishhad, is dispensed with if the first demand, called the talab-i-mawasibat, was made in the presence of the vendor or the vendee or on the premises sold and in the presence of witnesses who heard that demand, even though there was no invocation of those witnesses at the time, and (2) that the necessity of making a reference to the first demand at the time of making the second demand is dispensed with if the first demand was made in the presence of the vendor or the vendee or on the premises sold. If the first demand is made in the presence of witnesses of the vendor or vendee, or on the premises sold and in the presence of witnesses who heard the demand, it was not necessary to mention the fact of the first demand at the time of the Talab-i-isshad. We can sum up in this way that the case laws declared by any superior court other than Bangladesh including Pakistan after 25th March, 1971 (that is after independence of Bangladesh) and that of India after 13th August, 1947 (that is after partition of Pakistan) are not applicable in our jurisdiction as binding precedents.
138
Md. Jalal Ahmmed -Versus- The State and another
139
Syed Ahmed Mall and others -Versus- The State and another
140
Md. Shahidullah Miah -Versus- The State and another
141
Abdul Mannan vs. The State
142
Md. Abu Taleb and others Vs. Sree Binod Chandra Paul
143
Md. Nasir Uddin vs the state another
144
Md. Mamonor Rashid Vs. Government of Bangladesh and others
145
Md. Mamonor Rashid Vs. Government of Bangladesh and others
146
Mohammad Sohel vs- The State
In view of the above discussion, this appeal is allowed summarily and the order dated 05.01.2025 passed by the learned judge of the Tribunal in Nari-O-Shishu Nirjatan Daman Case No. 702 of 2018 is set aside. It is further ordered that the learned judge of the Tribunal shall summon the prosecution witnesses No. 1-6 to provide the appellant an opportunity to cross-examine them.
147
Dr. Zubaida Rahman -Versus- The State and others
148
Robi Aciata Limited represented by its Managing Director Vs. Daily Jugantor represented by its Acitng Editor and others
Appeal is dismissed.
149
Md. Ayub Ali vs the state
150
Md. Jamir Hossain Sarder -Versus- The State and another
This Site is Visited :