: High Court Division Full List
 
Case Type
Case/Tender Number
Year
Parties
Short Description
 

Case Number Parties Short Description
1
Nabila Mahmud and another. -Versus- Hamid Spinning Mills Limited and others
Allowed
2
Md. Rezaul Karim Bazlu Vs The Court of the General Certificate Officer, Dhaka and another
Absolute
3
Sajjad Al Rana Vs Member, Labour Appellate Tribunal, Kakrail, Dhaka and others
Absolute
4
Prodeep Kumar Sarker and others Vs Judge, Arpito Sampatti Pratyarpan, Appellate Tribunal, Rajbari and others
Disposed of
5
Md. Amir Hossain Vs The Government of Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Education and others
Absolute
6
Dr. Nozmus Sakib Vs Bangladesh and others
Absolute
7
Md. Hatem Ali Sarder, being dead, his legal heirs (1) Mahmuda Khatun and others Vs Arpita Sampatti Pratyarpan Appeal Tribunal and District Judge, Madaripur and others
Absolute
8
Munshi Mohiuddin Ahmed- Vs- Bangladesh and others
Disposed of
9
Nabila Zaman Kotha- VS- The State and another
Discharged
10
Md. Tanvir Ahmed-Vs-The Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Road Transport and Bridges and others
Discharged
11
Tuhin Mahmud-Vs-Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Education and others
Disposed of
12
Dharmapur Girls’ High School attached Non-Government Primary School, of Police Station-Gobindaganj, District- Gaibandha, represented by the Headmistress Mosa. Rozina Begum vs.Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Education and others
Disposed of
14
Rakhi Mondal-Vs-Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Education, Bangladesh Secretariat, and others
Absolute
15
Md. Nurul Amin and others-Vs-Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Secondary and Higher Education Division, Ministry of Education and others
Disposed of
16
Mejor Md. Waliul Islam (Retd) … Petitioner -VersusJudge, Artha Rin Adalat, Barisal and Joint District Judge, 1st Court, Barisal and others. … Respondents
Discharged
17
Mohammed Shah Alam-Vs-Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs and others
Discharged
18
The State ...petitioner -Versus- Md. Zahidul Islam ...condemned-convict (Absconding)
In the result, the death reference is rejected. The death sentence is commuted to the sentence of imprisonment for life. The Tribunal is directed to recall the earlier conviction Warrant of Arrest and issue a fresh Warrant of Arrest mentioning the modified sentence.
19
The State ...petitioner -Versus- Sujan Bepari and another ...condemned-convicts (Absconding)
In the result, the death reference is rejected. The death sentence is commuted to sentence of imprisonment for life. The Tribunal is directed to recall the earlier Warrants of Arrest and issue fresh Warrants against the convicts for commutated sentence.
20
The State ...petitioner -Versus- Nur Mohammed ...condemned-prisoner
Let a copy of this judgment with a photostat copy of the confession exhibit-10 he recorded be sent to the Ministry of Law, Justice and Parliamentary Affairs, for taking appropriate steps against him.
21
The State ...petitioner -Versus- Chunnu Mural and others ...condemned-prisoners
In the result, the death reference is rejected. The appeals of condemned prisoners Selim Chowkider is allowed and the Rule issued in Miscellaneous Case so far it relates to Swapna Begum is made absolute. They are acquitted of the charges brought against them. Let condemned prisoners Selim Chowkider and Swapna Begum be set at liberty if not wanted in connection with any other case. The Jail Appeal Nos. 129 of 2019, 130 of 2019, 131 of 2019 and 132 of 2019 are disposed of. The death sentence awarded upon condemned prisoners Chunnu Mural and Nuru Mural is commuted to imprisonment for lifer. Let condemned prisoners Chunnu Mural and Nuru Mural be shifted to general cell from the condemned cell immediately.
22
The State .....petitioner -Versus- Md. Liton and 4 others .....condemned-prisoners
In the result, the reference is accepted on modification, the appeals filed are hereby dismissed and the Jail Appeals are disposed of.
23
The State .....petitioner -Versus- Md. Liton and 4 others .....condemned-prisoners
In the result, the reference is rejected. Appeals are allowed in modified form. The death sentences awarded upon the condemned petitioners under section 9(3) of the Ain are set aside. Each of them is sentenced to suffer imprisonment for life under section 9(1) of the Ain. Let the condemned prisoners be removed from the condemned cell and shifted to the general cell, if not required in connection with any other sentence. The jail appeals are disposed of.
24
Md. Nurul Haque and others Vs Md. Shamsuddin Mondol and others
Absolute
25
Kamal Pradhan ... Convict-Petitioner -Versus- Md. Shohel Rana Pradhan and another ...Complainant-Opposite Parties
The Rule is discharged
26
Golam Muhiuddin Selim and another ... Appellants -Versus- Abu Saeem Md. Tofazzal Hossain and another ... Respondents
The appeal is dismissed
27
Md. Rabiul Islam Sumon ... Convict-Appellant-Petitioner -Versus- The State and another ...Complainant-Respondent-Opposite Parties
The Rule is discharged
28
The State ...petitioner -Versus- Md. Nuruzzaman ...condemned-prisoner
In the result, we hold that the reference is liable to be rejected and accordingly, it is rejected. The appeals filed by the condemned prisoner and other two convicts are allowed and the Jail Appeal is accordingly disposed of. Let the condemned prisoner be set at liberty if not wanted in connection with any other case. The other convict-appellants and their sureties are discharged from respective bail bonds.
29
Abdul Khaleque Chowdhury Vs Chairman, Cox`s bazar Pourashava and others
Discharged
30
Mrs. Rabia Basri - VS- Mohammad Habibur Rahaman and others
Absolute
31
Md. Emam Uddin @ Eman Ali -Versus- The Chairman, Civil Aviation Authority of Bangladesh, Headquarters, Kurmitola, Dhaka and another
.
32
Kalipada Das Vs. Ananda Chandra Das (Minor) and others
.
33
Md. Bulu Mia -Versus- Saiya Sultana Binu and others
.
34
Legend World Tank PTE, -Versus- Multinational Shipping Co. Ltd., and others
Differing, with the greatest respect, from the larger bench decision in Accom, this court is unable to subscribe to the reasoning adopted therein. In the considered view of this court, sections 7, 7A and 10 of the Arbitration Act, 2001 are capable of operating in aid of arbitral proceedings even where the juridical seat of arbitration is outside Bangladesh. Properly construed, these provisions are intended to facilitate and support the arbitral process by conferring limited judicial assistance, rather than by exercising supervisory jurisdiction over the arbitral proceedings themselves. Consequently, the invocation of section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, in place of section 10 of the Arbitration Act, 2001, as adopted in Accom, appears both unnecessary and unwarranted.
35
The Government of Bangladesh, represented by the Deputy Commissioner, Satkhira and others -Versus- Most. Masura Khatun and others
Absolute
36
Md. Rezaul Karim Sarder and others … Plaintiff-Petitioners Versus Mst. Laily Munnnujan Nesabanu and others ...Defendant-Opposite parties
Absolute
37
Sonali Jute Mills Ltd. represented by its Manager, Administrative, Sonali Jute Mills Limited, Thana Khan Jahan Ali, District Khulna -Versus- Executive Engineer, Sales and Distribution Division-2, Power Development Board, B.L. College Road, Doulatpur, District Khulna and others
Discharged
38
Md. Shahidul Islam and others -Versus- Md Saidul Islam and others
Absolute
39
Md. Fajlul Haque and others Vs. 1(a) Saiara Begum and others
We find no provision in the Code prescribing a separate stage or proceeding described as an “admission hearing” of an ordinary suit after the issues have been framed. A Court may, of course, hear the parties on any question of law or procedure arising in the suit; but merely fixing a suit for an “admission hearing” does not, by itself, create a jurisdictional basis for rejection of the plaint under section 151 of the Code. Where the suit has already proceeded beyond the stage of framing of issues and is pending for trial, any order bringing the suit to an end by rejecting the plaint must be traceable to a specific provision of the Code or other law conferring such jurisdiction. The inherent power under section 151 cannot be invoked to create a procedure or jurisdiction which is not otherwise provided by law.
40
Ecotech Consultants Limited vs The Government of Bangladesh
Discharged
41
Md. Sajjad Hossain Sarder, being dead, leaving behind the following heirs Aysha Begum and others -Versus- Mrs. Rokaya Bibi and others
Absolute
42
Discharged
43
Dismissed
44
Chita Sreerampur Matshyajibi Samabaya Samity Ltd ... Plaintiff-Appellant -Versus- Sajjadur Rahman (Shajid) and others ... Plaintiff-Respondents
Dismissed
45
Abdur Rahman and another ... Defendant-Appellants -Versus- Mohammad Mashuk and another ... Plaintiff-Respondents
Disposed of
46
Sirajul Alam Chowdhury ... Plaintiff-Appellant -Versus- Ahmed Nur Chowdhury and another ... Defendant-Respondents
Disposed of
47
Kad Banu ... Appellant -Versus- Amir Hossain and others ... Respondents
Dismissed
48
Sheikh Md. Nurullah ... Defendant-Petitioner Versus Ummeh Kulsum Tanzila ... Plaintiff-Opposite party
Discharged
49
Moniruzzaman Bari and others … Plaintiff-Petitioners Versus Kamruzzaman Miah and others ... Defendant-Opposite parties
Discharged
50
Dr. Md. Sajahan (Saju) being dead his legal heirs 1(a) Mst. Nurjahan and others ... Plaintiff-Petitioners -Versus- Government of Bangladesh and another ... Defendant-Opposite Parties
Discharged
This Site is Visited :