Judgment : High Court Division Full List
 
Case Type
Case/Tender Number
Year
Parties
Short Description
 

Case Number Parties Short Description
601
Abul Kalam being dead his legal heirs Chan Banu and others. -Versus- Government of Bangladesh and others
602
Gas Transmission Company Limited represented by its Managing Director of GTCL Bhaban, Plot No. F-18/A, Sher-E-Bangla Nagar Administrative Area, Agargaon, Dhaka-1207.-Vs-Dipon Gas Company Limited, T.K. Bhaban (3rd Floor), 13, Karwan Bazar Commercial Area, Dhaka-1215 represented by its Managing Director and another.
603
Kamal Hossain Bokaul -vs- Government of Bangladesh and others
604
Salah Uddin Badal Welfare Foundation and another
Disposed of
605
Md. Shafiqul Islam @ Shafi
Discharged
606
Md. Rafiqullah vs Md. Roustam Ali
607
Md. Shahab Uddin -Versus- Govt. of Bangladesh and others
Discharged for non prosecution
608
Md. Zakir Hossain Vs. The State
609
Md. Shah Alam hang and others v s A. Sobhan Khan and others
610
Hosne Ara Begum .... Petitioner -VersusM/S Shilpi Food Products Ltd and others ....Opposite-parties
611
Md. Asaduzzaman Apel Vs. The State
612
Md. Robiul Islam Vs. The State
613
Md. Miraj Khalifa Vs. The State
614
Md. Aminul Islam Vs. The State
615
Md. Rubel Vs. The State
616
Md. Sobuj Mia Vs. The State
617
Barik Mia Vs. The State
618
Md. Riad Hossain Vs. The State
619
Md. Arif Vs. The State
620
Md. Sabbir Hasan Sagar Vs. The State
621
Ellius Munshi Vs. The State
622
Foysal Vs. The State
623
Sumon Mia Vs. The State
624
Sumon Mia Vs. The State
625
Md. Miraj Biswas Vs. The State
626
Md. Fazar Ali Vs. The State
627
Aminul Islam Vs. The State
628
Md. Aminul Islam Vs. The State
629
Shandha Mandal Vs. The State
630
Suman Sheikh Vs. The State
631
Md. Asaduzzaman Roni and another Vs. The State
632
Md. Ripon Vs. The State
633
Md. Mizanur Rahman Vs. The State
634
Most. Shima Akter Vs. The State
635
Md. Hinju Vs. The State
636
Gosto Chandra Mahady Vs. The State
637
Md. Alauddin Bepary Vs. The State
638
Md. Lutfur Rahman being dead his heirs: 1(a) Numuna Khatun, wife of late Md. Safiuddin and others.-Vs-Lieutenant Colonel (Ret.) Nur Mohammad being dead his heirs: 1(a) Rabeya Mumtaz alias Most. Rabeya Mumtaz, wife of late Lieutenant Colonel (Ret.) Nur Mohammad and others.
639
Arab Ali being dead his legal heirs: 1 (ka). Gafor Prodania and others Plaintiff-Appellant-Petitioners Versus Abdur Rab Chokder being dead his legal heirs:- 1(ka). Md. Joynal Chokdar and others Contesting Defendants-Respondents-Opposite Parties
640
Orion Sports Limited-Versus- Bangladesh Cricket Board (BCB)
641
The State Vs. Milon Mondal
The Death Reference is accepted.
642
Rangs Properties Ltd. -Versus- The 4th Court of Artha Rin Adalat, Dhaka and another
Discharged for non prosecution
643
Md. Nurul Islam -Versus- Uttara Bank Ltd. and others
Discharged for non prosecution
644
645
Khan Mohammad Aby Nayem and others Vs. The State
646
Masrur Hasan Khan (Orin) and another Vs. Belal Hossain and others
647
Md. Humayun Kabir Shahin Vs. The State and another
The Rule is made absolute
648
Md. Omar Faruque Bani Vs. The State and another
The Rule is made absolute
649
Sofiur Rahman Vs. Equity Property Management (Pvt.) Limited Represented by the Managing Director and others
Sub-section (12) of section 12 of the Arbitration Act stipulates that the decision of the learned District Judge under sub-sections (3), (4) and (7) of section 12 of the Act, 2001 shall be final. Since the decision of the learned District Judge in respect of appointment of Arbitrator(s) under section 12 is final in view of the provision under sub-section (12) of the Arbitration Act, 2001 no revision under section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure is maintainable before this Court against such decision of the learned District Judge. Accordingly, this civil revision is not maintainable.
650
Fauji Chatkal Limited, represented by its Managing Director, Adamjee Court (2nd Floor), 115-120 Motijheel C/A, Dhaka. Vs Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary Ministry of Education, Bangladesh Secretariat, Ramna, Dhaka and others.
The consistent view of apex courts of this sub-continent is that not only a gift under Muhammadan Law but also under Transfer of property Act, a gift must be coupled with acceptance and delivery of possession. Where a donee of property is in bona fide possession of it, though the gift had not been perfected by a registered instrument in accordance with law, the donor or its representative cannot oust the donee who had been in undisturbed possession of the property for a long period though such period falls short of 12 years.
This Site is Visited :