Orders : High Court Division Full List
 
Case Type : 
Case/Tender Number : 
Year : 
Parties : 
Short Description : 
 

Case Number Parties Short Description
1
Wilmington Trust Company. -Versus- HG AVIATION LTD. Regent Airways and others.
In exercising its winding-up jurisdiction, the Court must have due regard to the interests of the company as well as those of its creditors. Winding up is undoubtedly a serious remedy and ought not to be ordered where a debt is disputed on substantial and bona fide grounds or the company is experiencing a temporary commercial or financial difficulty. The position, however, is materially different where the debt is established and admitted by the company, remains unpaid, and the company has failed to honour an agreed arrangement/ schedule for its payment. In the present case, the respondent-company has not only acknowledged its liability towards the petitioner but has also entered into an arrangement for payment of the outstanding dues, which it subsequently failed to honour. Its own pleadings further disclose substantial outstanding liabilities to other creditors. In these circumstances, the mere assertion of a possibility of future investment or an improvement in the company’s financial position, without any concrete evidence demonstrating a present or reasonably certain ability to discharge its existing liabilities, cannot by itself constitute sufficient ground for withholding the winding-up order.
2
Midland Bank Limited Vs. M.V. KALAMATA TRADER and others.
Application is allowed in modified form.
3
ICE(BD) Limited Vs. Chandra Spinning Mills Limited and another
Application for addition of party is rejected with cost of Tk. 10,000/-
4
LUFESA DIVER`S SCRL -VS-M.V. PRINCESS JIA JIA AND OTHERS
Application is allowed.
5
Discharged
6
Dismissed
7
Discharged
8
Md. Saidur Rahman Letu Vs. M.V. ASIA ZIRCON II AND OTHERS.
The Rule issued in Admiralty Suit No. 82 of 2017 is discharged.
9
Nautical Bulk Carriers S.A. and another Vs. M.V. PROSPERITY and others
Order passed
10
Prof. Dr. Ali Zaheer Al-Amin and others. - Versus - Impulse Health Services and Research Centre Limited and others
Constitutes an independent Interim Board of Directors.
11
Linde Bangladesh Limited Vs. The Registrar of Joint Stock Companies and Firms and others.
Application rejected.
12
Mr. Rofiqul Islam Sohel, Advocate Vs. Mr. Abdul Halim Biswas Advocate with Mr. Mohammad Ataul Gani Advocate,
By now, the question is no longer res integra. Order XL of the Code of Civil Procedure confers a wide discretionary power upon the Court to appoint a Receiver whenever it appears to be just, proper, and convenient to do so. In a partition suit, where a co-sharer having a substantial share in the joint property is kept out of possession and deprived of the benefits and income arising therefrom, the appointment of a Receiver is justified even in the absence of proof of waste, mismanagement, or deterioration of the property. Moreover, under Rule 1 of Order XL of the Code of Civil Procedure, the appellate Court has the jurisdiction to appoint a Receiver in an appropriate case during the pendency of an appeal.
13
Metrocem Cement Limited Vs. M.V. HAJI KAYES, M-7691 and others.
Application for return of the plaint is allowed.
14
Noman Ahmed vs. The State and another
Compromise in section 138 cases, NI Act.
15
BanBridge navigation, DMCC UAE Versus M.V. MAJESTIC VERA and others.
Allowed in different form
16
Md. Rakib Hossain Pias vs. The State and another
Compromise in Section 138 cases of NI Act.
17
ENMA LIMITED CORPORATION Vs. M.V. KITANA AND OTHERS.
disposed of
18
Sea Lead Shipping Pte. Ltd. Vs. Everbest Logistics Limited and others.
Application for return of plaint is rejected
19
Belal Hossain and others Vs. The State and another
Compromise in Section 138 matters.
20
Md. Khorshed Uddin Vs. The State and another
Compromise in Section 138 matters.
21
Bangal Cement Ltd and others
Dismissed
22
Rahimafrooz Global Ltd vs.
Dismissed
23
Discharged
24
Panmark Impex PIE Ltd. Vs. The Vessel A.M. Accord and others,
order passed
25
Zurich Insurnce Europe AG Vs. BM Container Depot Limited and others.
Application for return of the plaint is allowed.
26
Mund
Application for return of the plaint is allowed.
27
Falvey Insurance Group Vs. BM Container Deport and others
Application for return of the plaint is allowed.
28
Sabera Begum Vs. M.V. TITU 54 and others.
The application for release of the defendant No. 1 vessel from the order of arrest is disposed of.
29
Grandee Central East Shipping LLC Vs. M.V. PRINCESS JIA JIA and others.
The application for vacating the order of arrest is disposed of.
30
Satabdi Datta Gupta @ Satabdi Dutta (Arin) Vs. Silvester Datta Gupta
Suit decreed on compromise
31
Global Radiance Ship Management Pte. Ltd. Vs. The vessel M.T. ARIANA and others.
Application for rejection of plaint is rejected
32
Md. Mienul Hossen and others Vs. The vessel M.T. FADLE-E-RABBI and others.
The instant application be treated as Admiralty Suit No. 72 of 2017 (in Execution)
33
Mohammad Rashed Ali Vs. M.V.AGIA FEVRONIA and others.
Application for reduction of security amount is allowed.
34
Island Oil Limited Vs. M.T. MANDALA (IMO No. 95000598) and others.
The plaint of the suit is rejected and the security Bank Guarantee is returned to the defendants.
35
Anlima Energy Limited Vs. The Vessel M.V. ANSARY-1 AND OTHERS.
Allowed
36
Globe Ocean Pte. Ltd. Vs. M.V. TELERIG
Application for vacating the order of arrest is allowed.
37
Panmark Impex PIE Ltd. Vs. A.M. ACCORD and others
application rejected, auction confirmed and time extended
38
Md. Moshiur Rahman and another Vs. Secretary, Ministry of Finance and others.
Rejected summarily
39
The Peninsula Chittagong Ltd. and others Vs. National Board of Revenue(NBR) and others.
40
Md. Shameem Ahsan and others Vs. One-way Textile Limited and others.
The application for dismissal of the winding up petition is disposed of.
41
Chowdhury Md. Humayun Kabir and others Vs. The Registrar of Joint Stock Companies and Firms and others.
disposed of
42
Nirman Koushali Pre-engineered Steel Structures Limited Vs. Ranabir Kumar Roy and others
Rejected summarily
43
Human Rights and Peace for Bangladesh (HRPB) Vs. Govt of Bangladesh and others
White Stone
44
Brithish American Tobacco Bangladesh Company Limited vs. The Commissioner, Large Taxpayer`s Unit and another.
45
Mohd. Abul Kashem vs. Most. Anowra Begum
rejected summarily
46
Monjil Mia and another
47
48
Md. Manik Vs. The State
49
Abdus Salam Vs. The State
50
The State- Md. Yusuf Sikder
Advance order
এই সাইটটি প্রদর্শিত হয়েছে :