দায়বর্জন বিবৃতি (DISCLAIMER)

এই ওয়েবসাইটে প্রকাশিত রায় বা আদেশ আপনি google translation এর মাধ্যমে বাংলায় দেখতে পাচ্ছেন তা সুপ্রীম কোর্ট কর্তৃক বাংলায় অনূদিত নয়। জনসাধারণের বিচার-প্রক্রিয়ায় সহজ অভিগম্যতা নিশ্চিতকরণের অভিপ্রায়ে বাংলায় অনূদিত রায়-আদেশ দেখার ব্যবস্থা রাখা হয়েছে। অনূদিত রায় বা আদেশের অনুলিপি সইমোহরী/জাবেদা নকলের (certified copy) বিকল্প হিসেবে অথবা অন্য কোন উদ্দেশ্যে ব্যবহার করা যাবে না। রায় ও আদেশ বাস্তবায়নের ক্ষেত্রে মামলার নথিতে বিধৃত মূল রায় বা আদেশ প্রণিধানযোগ্য।
Microsoft Word - J. Nazrul - Final Judgement

1

Justice Md. Nazrul Islam Talukder

I have gone through the judgments proposed to be delivered by Mr. Justice Md. Shawkat Hossain and Mr. Justice Md. Abu Zafor Siddique. It appears that the judgment written by Mr. Justice Md. Shawkat Hossain is in English while the judgment laid down by Mr. Justice Md. Abu Zafor Siddique is in Bengali. I have also gone through the FIR, charge sheet, order of framing charge, evidence of the prosecution witnesses, evidence of the defence witnesses, inquest reports, post mortem reports, material exhibits, confessional statements of the accused and 342 statements of the accused. During hearing of the death reference along with connected appeals, I have also watched the video clippings at the court displayed by the prosecution with regard to movements and activities of the BDR rebels and recovery of dead bodies from the mass graves. In order to avert proliferation of volumes of judgment and to save the precious public time of the court, I am going to deliver this judgement in a concise manner without repeating the observations and findings that have been made in the judgements given by my two learned brothers. It may be mentioned that I along with the learned judges of the Special Bench have come to a unanimous decision in respect of the convictions and sentences of the accused of this case. However, I fully concur with the views, observations and opinions expressed in the judgment delivered by Mr. Justice Md. Abu Zafor Siddique for the reasons that his lordship has delivered the judgment considering and scrutinizing the facts and circumstances of the case, the legal evidence and other circumstances giving proper explanations and reasons. Apart from this, his lordship has elaborated his

Before coming to a conclusion in this matter, I would like to draw a brief history regarding the creation of Bangladesh Rifles (BDR) and Border Guard Bangladesh (BGB), which has become apparent to us from the submissions advanced by Mr. Mahbubey Alam, the learned Attorney-General for Bangladesh along with Mr. K.M. Zahid Sarwar, DAG and Mr. Mosharaf Hossain Kazol, the Government Prosecutor acted as Additional Attorney-General along with Mr. Sheikh Baharul Islam, D.A.G and Mr. Monjur Mohammad Shahnewaz Tipu, A.A.G.

Historical background of formation and creation of Bangladesh Rifles (BDR) and at present Border Guard Bangladesh (BGB).

I have come to know that Bangladesh Rifles was earlier known as BDR in short and now it has been renamed and is known as BGB after the BDR revolt in 2009. It is evident from the history that this paramilitary force was earlier known as ‘Frontier Protection Force’ under the Ramgarh Local Battalion which was established on 29 June, 1795 at Ramgarh at the instance of East India Company with a view to suppressing insurgent activities around the Ramgarh area. This said force established its first camp at Pilkhana, the present Headquarters of BGB. The Ramgarh Local Battalion performed its functions for a period of 65 years starting from 1795 to 1860. With the passage of time, the name, shape and size of Ramgarh Local Battalion became changed time to time. Later the Ramgarh Local Battalion was renamed as Frontier Guards which started its journey in 1861 and carried out its functions till 1890. In 1891, the Frontier Guards were reorganized and reequipped with modern weapons and renamed once again as the Bengal Military Police which existed and continued its functions till 1919. This force participated in the First World War which lasted from 28 July, 1914 to 11 November, 1918. Subsequently, Bengal Military Police was reorganized once again and renamed as the Eastern Frontier Rifles in 1920. This force having the name of Eastern Frontier Rifles performed its functions and existed from 1920 to 1946. It also took part in numerous military operations during the 2nd world war which lasted from 1939 to 1945.

After the partition of India, Eastern Frontier Rifles was regrouped and renamed as the East Pakistan Rifles in 1947. It was the primary border protection force of the then East Pakistan, now Bangladesh. During the liberation war of Bangladesh in 1971, the thousands of members of East Pakistan Rifles raised their arms against the Pakistan Army and its followers and many of them embraced martyrdom in that liberation war. On 29 January, 1972, the East Pakistan Rifles was renamed as the Bangladesh Rifles with the officers seconded from Bangladesh Army. On 25-26 February, 2009 while observing BDR week, 2009, some disgruntled BDR soldiers staged a mutiny and raised their arms against their officers who were seconded from Bangladesh Army for realisation of their demands and tried to take control of BDR Headquarters and BDR soldiers as a result of which 74 people including 57 army officers together with Director General of the BDR were mercilessly killed in that carnage. In the aftermath of the mutiny/revolt, the Bangladesh Rifles (BDR) was reorganised and

The Border Guard Bangladesh is a paramilitary force under the Ministry of Home Affairs. Its main responsibility is to defend the border security of the country, prevent smuggling, extend the government authority to remote and isolate areas and assist the Army during the war. During the war time, BGB comes under the direct control of the Ministry of Defence as an auxiliary force to Bangladesh Army. In addition to it, they also assist the Government in disaster management, maintenance of law and order, relief and rehabilitation work after any kind of natural disaster. In essence, the Border Guard Bangladesh is the vigilant sentinel of the national frontier and this paramilitary force always remains ever vigilant in the frontier. Before and after the independence of Bangladesh, this force resisted many thrust of invaders to safeguard our land and many of them died for those noble causes. There are many border conflicts among Bangladesh and the neighbouring countries but the BGB force faces those problems very bravely and

The BGB inherits a bright and glorious history of two hundred years from the time of their initial creation at Ramgarh in 1795. It has also a valiant and glorious role in the war of Liberation as it forged resistance against the invading Pakistani force at the call of the Father of the Nation Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman in 1971. It may be mentioned that on 7 March, 1971 Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman proclaimed independence of Bangladesh in a thunderous voice at a huge gathering at the Racecourse Maidan (now Suhrawardy Uddyan) and declared for a struggle for independence of Bangladesh. The said speech inspired the people of the then East Pakistan to participate in the struggle for independence of Bangladesh. Since Bangabandhu proclaimed independence of Bangladesh during the landmark speech on 7 March, 1971, on the night of 25 March, 1971, the Pakistan Armed Forces launched ‘Operation Searchlight’ in the Capital of East Pakistan rolling out their tanks on the streets of Dhaka and committed genocide, rape, arson and crime against peace and humanity in the different places of Dhaka. They also massacred students and intellectuals in Dhaka University, attacked the East Pakistan Rifles base at Pilkhana and Rajarbagh police line in Dhaka on that day killing a number of unarmed people. In the back drop of such events, Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman in the early hours of 26th March, 1971 declared independence of Bangladesh in the following manner:-

“This may be my last message, from today Bangladesh is Independent. I call upon the people of Bangladesh wherever, you might be and with whatever you have, to resist the army of occupation to the last. Your fight must go on until the last soldier of the Pakistan occupation army is expelled from the soil of Bangladesh and final victory is achieved.”

 Subsequently, at the order and instruction of Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman, some student leaders of Dhaka University handed over the aforesaid text of declaration to the then EPR Subedar Showkat Ali at Gate No. 2 of Pilkhana and thereafter the text of declaration was transmitted to all over Bangladesh through the transmitter of the then EPR-telegram and teleprinter. At the time of transmitting the text of declaration of independence, the invading Pakistan Army captured Subeder Major Showkat Ali and he was taken to Physical Training College at Mohammadpur. The Pakistan Army inhumanly and brutally tortured and persecuted him and thereafter he was mercilessly killed on 30.04.1971. However, his dead body was not found after killing him. Consequently, the declaration of independence of Bangladesh at the order, instruction and on behalf of the father of the Nation Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman was broadcasted across the country on 26 March, 1971 from Kalurghat Radio Station, Chittagong. On 30 October 2017, UNESCO recognised the aforesaid historic speech of Bangabandhu Sheikh Mujibur Rahman delivered on 7th March 1971 as the world’s documentary heritage adding it in the memory of the world international register. The BGB is a partner of glorious history of the independence of the country in 1971. The then East Pakistan Rifles joined the Mukti Bahini (freedom

 The aforesaid glorious history of BDR became tarnished a bit by the incident of BDR carnage happened on 25th and 26th February, 2009 at the BDR Headquarters, Pilkhana, Dhaka. It is very shocking to note that on that day, some disgruntled BDR soldiers raised their arms against their officers for materialising their demands. On 24th February, 2009, there was a ceremonial parade at Pilkhana ahead of BDR week 2009, in which Hon’ble Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina took salute of the parade. It was a very organised, beautiful, appealing and delightful parade. But the next two days were full of chaos, revolting, indiscipline and horror. It may be mentioned that on the 25th and 26th of February, 2009, a number of BDR members out of criminal conspiracy carried out an act of terror with utter disregard to human life and dignity in and around the Pilkhana premises killing 74 persons including 57 army officers. They inhumanly tortured the family members of the army officers, ransacked the valuable materials kept in the residence of the army officers and looted away their household goods

The prosecution case as established by the investigating officer and other prosecution witnesses.    

It is a long standing practice and tradition of Bangladesh Rifles (BDR), now the Border Guard Bangladesh, in short (BGB) to observe BDR Week at a convenient time every year at BDR Headquarters, Pilkhana, Dhaka in order to stage a good number of trainings and cultural events. Unlike every year, such a huge annual congregation of the BDR personnel under

the name of BDR week, 2009 was scheduled to be held from 23rd-27th February, 2009. In order to observe BDR week, 2009, many  BDR personnel including many army officers from different battalions, sectors and units of BDR participated in that programme coming from in and outside the BDR Headquarters. At the time of observance of BDR week, on 25th February, 2009 about 97 army officers of different ranks of Bangladesh Army from Pilkhana, Dhaka and many other officers from outside the BDR Headquarters and around 2500-3000 BDR personnel were present in the Darbar Hall of the BDR Headquarters at Pilkhana to attend the Darbar (Meeting) being presided over by Major General Shakil Ahmed, Director General of the then Bangladesh Rifles. Now I want to narrate how the BDR rebels, that is, the accused/convicts of this case

killed the army officers in and around the Darbar Hall and in other places of Pilkhana.   

The Killing of DG BDR Major General Shakil Ahmed, DDG Brigadier General Mohammad Abdul Bari and many other officers in and around the Darbar Hall. 

From the evidence led by the investigating officer and other prosecution witnesses namely PW 1 Nabo Joti Khisha, PW 3 Lieutenant Colonel Abu Tasnim, PW 4 Lieutenant Colonel Shamsul Alam Chowdhury, PW 5 Lieutenant Colonel Md. Abdul Mokim Sarker, PW 8 Lieutenant Colonel Md. Zahid Hasan, PW 9 Lieutenant Colonel Md. Maksudul Haque, PW 10 Major Md. Alamgir Hossain Dewan and PW 11 Major Md. Sujaul Haque, it appears that on 25th  February, 2009 at around 9:00 a.m, after the arrival of DG at the Darbar Hall at Pilkhana, the Darbar (meeting) was started with the recitation from Holy Quran. Afterward DG, BDR started delivering his speeches on different matters including the operation Dal-Vhat programme before the attendants. The DG of the BDR informed that the outstanding money earned from the operation Dal-Vhat programme would be used and spent for the welfare of the BDR members. As soon as the DG of the BDR told about the operation Dal-Vhat programme, Sepoy Moin of 13 Battalion entered the Darbar Hall, came over the stage with arms and pointed the same at DG. Subsequently, another Sepoy namely Kazol of 44 Battalion also entered the Darbar Hall. However, DDG Brigadier General Bari, Colonel Anis, Lieutenant Colonel Shams (PW 4), Lieutenant Colonel Elahi along with other officers present over there disarmed Sepoy Moin, but Sepoy Kazol of 44

The aforesaid fact of looting arms and ammunitions followed by criminal conspiracy is also noticeable from the 164 statements made by  Sepoy Selim Reza CS accused No. 6, Sepoy Md. Sajjad Hossain CS accused No. 10, Sepoy Kazol Ali CS accused No. 11 and Sepoy Md. Rafiqul Islam CS accused No.19.

After looting the arms and ammunitions, the BDR rebels assembled at Sultan ground and exchanged arms and ammunitions according to their pre-plan and conspiracy. Then the BDR rebels started roaming violently with arms and ammunitions and then proceeded towards the Darbar Hall, Darbar Hall area and different places of Pilkhana. Some BDR rebels very fiercely started firing outside the Darbar Hall and at one stage, under the leadership of Sepoy Selim Reza, Sepoy Kazol, Sepoy Rezaul, Sepoy Altaf, Sepoy Moin and Sepoy Rafiqul along with about 10/15 BDR rebels entered the Darbar Hall. In view of the aforesaid incident, out of fear of life, the army officers including the lady doctor officers took shelter behind the screen of the stage and in the different places of the Darbar Hall. Sepoy Selim Reza appeared in front of the stage taking arms in one hand and megaphone in another hand, pointed arms at them, ordered the army officers to come out from different hideouts, rebuked the army officers with highly objectionable filthy languages and directed them to surrender. Getting order from Sepoy Selim Reza, the officers being compelled came out from behind the screen of the stage raising their hands. Then Sepoy Selim Reza ordered the officers to go out of the Darbar Hall pointing arms at them. In the meantime, another group of BDR rebels came therein, directed

the 1st group of officers came out of the Darbar Hall, they were compelled to lie down on the road at the north-west side near water fountain of the Darbar Hall. Subsequently they were killed by opening several fires on them. The aforesaid killing incident was supported and corroborated by the confessional statements of Sepoy Selim Reza CS accused No.6 and Sepoy Md. Habibur Rahman CS accused No 26 and the evidence of  PW 9 Lieutenant Colonel Md. Maksudul Haque.

From the evidence of PW 9 Lieutenant Colonel Md. Maksudul Haque and the confessional statements of Sepoy Selim Reza CS accused No.6, Sepoy Md. Rafiqul Islam CS accused No. 19, Sepoy Md. Habibur Rahman CS accused No 26, Sepoy Md. Abdul Muhit CS accused No. 70 and Sepoy Md. Ibrahim CS accused No. 68, it is evident that

after killing the 1st group of the officers, a few minutes later, Sepoy Selim Reza of 44 Rifle Battalion again appeared near the stage and witnessing the movement of the screen of the stage, he came to know that some officers were concealed behind the screen of the stage. By using megaphone, he again ordered the army officers, that is, the another group of army officers who took shelter behind the screen of the stage and in other places to come out, rebuked them with highly objectionable filthy languages and issued threat of killing if they failed to come out. Then DG, DDG and 10/12 other officers came down from the stage. Sepoy Selim Reza further rebuked and ordered the officers to go “one by one” making a queue raising their hands. Thereafter at around 10:45 a.m, DG and other officers, that is, the another group of army officers started going out towards the north-west side of the Darbar

Hall maintaining a line. At that time Sepoy Selim Reza of 44 Rifle Battalion, Sepoy Sajjad Hossain of 13 Battalion, Sepoy Ibrahim of 44 Rifle Battalion, Sepoy Obaidul of 44 Rifle Battalion, Sepoy Rafiqul of 44 Rifle Battalion, Sepoy Emran of 24 Rifle Battalion and some other BDR rebels started going to the western side of the Darbar Hall aiming arms at the officers. At that time DAD Nasir was with the BDR rebels. As soon as the DG and others officers came out through north-west gate of the Darbar Hall, Sepoy Selim Reza, Sepoy Atoar of 44 Rifle Battalion, Sepoy Ibrahim, Sepoy Obaidul, Sepoy Rafiqul, Sepoy Sajjad, Lance Naik Ekram of 24 Rifle Battalion and other BDR rebels opened burst- fires on them as a result of which the army officers fell down on the floor receiving bullet injuries. The bodies of the army officers were riddled with a

spray of bullets as a result of which all the army officers instantly succumbed to the injuries and the dead bodies were fallen scattered in and outside the Darbar Hall. At that moment, DAD Nasir of 44 Rifle Battalion was present at the place of occurrence with the BDR rebels. It is evident from the confessional statement of Sepoy Md. Rafiqul Islam CS accused No. 19 that at the time of killing the army officers, DAD Nasir of 44 Rifle Battalion was also present there with the BDR rebels. After opening burst-fires and fires, the DG and officers fell down on the ground receiving bullet injuries. In order to ensure the death of the officers, the BDR rebels charged bayonets and kicked on the dead bodies of the officers in order to see whether the officers were alive or not. When the BDR rebels became confirmed that no officers were alive, then DAD Nasir of 44 Rifle Battalion left the place of occurrence. Apart from the aforesaid evidence and materials, the facts of killing of army officers are also evident from the evidence of PW 536 Brigadier General Waker-Uz-Zaman who has stated in his evidence that on 27.02.2009 at 10:30 a.m, this witness as Second-In-Command (2IC) of 17 East Bengal Regiment along with his brigade commander and other army officers entered the Pilkhana. He went to DG bungalow, Darbar Hall and different quarters of the officers. Going at DG bungalow and Darbar Hall, he found many alamots and marks of killing therein. However, he recorded some scenario of alamots and marks of killing of DG bungalow in his personal mobile. Subsequently, he converted those scenario into CD. Later, during trial of the case, this witness produced the CD before the court and the same was exhibited as exhibit No. CL XXXIV.

The Killing of Major Mostafa Asaduzzaman @ Asad

It appears from the evidence of PW 28, Sepoy Md. Anwar Hossain that on 25.02.2009 at about 8:30 a.m, this witness came to Head Office of Sadar Rifle Battalion for leave purpose and at that time DAD Touhid was present in his office and saw him leaving the office. Remaining therein he came to hear sound of firings at Darbar Hall area at 9:30 a.m. He came to see some BDR rebels to open fires. He witnessed Havildar Tariqul and 2/3 other BDR rebels to assault Major Asad. On that day, at about 9:50 a.m, DAD Touhid being excited ordered the BDR rebels to bring arms and to kill the army officers. It is learnt that immediately after outbreak of revolt, Major Asad being thrashed by the BDR rebels fell down near the stairs of Sadar Rifle Battalion and cried for help. Then

Major Asad was taken to the office room of Commanding Officer (CO) at the 1st floor by this witness. Within 2/1 minutes later, DAD Touhid entered the office room of Commanding Officer (CO). Major Asad asked DAD Touhid, “what is happening?”. In reply, DAD Touhid answered, “Do you not understand?”. Thereafter DAD Kader came therein. Then DAD Kader and DAD Touhid went out together. Within 4/5 minutes later Lieutenant Colonel Jahan Ara Begum came at the room of Commanding Officer (CO). After 2/1 minutes, Naib Subedar Nurunnabi opened fires towards the windows of the office room of the Commanding Officer (CO) from the outside and then went away from that place. The bullets struck the glasses of the windows as a result of which those were broken into pieces. On such situation Major Asad and Lieutenant Colonel Jahan

Ara Begum hid themselves in the room of Commanding Officer (CO) locking the door. This witness hid himself under the table of Commanding Officer (CO). About 10/15 minutes later, DAD Touhid along with Havildar Belayet, Naik Asad, Sepoy Aminar and 3 other BDR rebels being armed with weapons appeared at the room of the Commanding Officers (CO). Having not found Major Asad there, DAD Touhid ordered the BDR rebels to break down the doors of the bathroom and went away therefrom. Then they broke open the door of bathroom and brought Major Asad and Lieutenant Colonel Jahan Ara Begum from that place. Then Major Asad sat on the chair and then the BDR rebels brought Lieutenant Colonel Jahan Ara Begum from the room. Havildar Belayet, Naik Asad and Sepoy Aminar stayed at the room. After a while, DAD Touhid appeared at the room of Commanding Officer (CO) and looking at Major Asad, he ordered the BDR rebels to finish him. Then and there, Havildar Belayet, Naik Asad and Sepoy Aminar opened fires at Major Asad and went away killing him therein. This witness received bullet injuries in his hip and leg while he hid himself under the table of the Commanding Officer (CO). The dead body of Major Asad was fallen motionless and found careless therein. The aforesaid evidence has been supported and corroborated by  PW 16 Md. Ashifur Rahman Akash who has stated in his evidence that on 25.02.2009 before going to Darbar, Major Asad called this witness for attaching belt badge in his uniform. After attaching the belt badge, Major Asad went to Darbar. This witness came back to his tailoring shop inside the Pilkhana. On that day,

around 9.25 to 9:30 a.m he came to hear sound of firings from the Darbar Hall and then from the balcony he came to see the BDR personnel who were running to and fro coming out from the Darbar Hall. At that time, Havildar Tariqul, Sepoy Aminar Rahman were standing in front of the garage situated in south- east corner of the Sadar Rifle Battalion; when Major Asad came near the garden in front of the office of the Sadar Rifle Battalion coming out of the Darbar Hall, Havildar Major Tariqul caught hold of him and scolded him as a ‘son of bitch’. Thereafter, Sepoy Aminar Rahman and one unknown Sepoy caught Major Asad by holding his hands from both sides; thereafter, Havildar Tariqul opening his belt from the waist started beating on nose, mouth, chest and the backside of Major Asad; Major Asad pushing him aside came to the 1st floor of Sadar Rifle Battalion and

entered the room of Commanding Officer (CO). Sepoy Aminar followed him from the behind. At that time Havildar Tariqul staying at the soldiers line uttered and ordered by shouting that no BDR person would be in empty hand, everybody would go to Darbar Hall with arms and kill the army officers by opening fires as soon as army officers were seen and found. After a while Lieutenant Colonel Jahan Ara Begum was brought to the office of Commanding Officer (CO) at the 1st floor of the Sadar Rifle Battalion by a BDR rebel at gunpoint. At that time Havildar Belayet was seen with SMG while Naik Asad was seen with rifle. Both of them opened fires targeting the office of Commanding Officer (CO). Havildar Belayet uttered to bring out major Asad and rebuked him calling son of bitch and ordered the other BDR rebels to kill him in such a way so that he could not be survived. Then using the filthy languages, Havildar Belayet told Naik Asad that they would kill Major Asad and then both of them entered the Sadar Rifle Battalion. After a while 4/5 BDR rebels brought Lieutenant Colonel Jahan Ara Begum at the road from the 1st floor beating her left and right and compelled her to board the ambulance. Subsequently, Havildar Belayet, Naik Asad and Sepoy Aminur Rahman being armed with weapons entered the office room of Commanding Officer (CO) and this witness heard the sound of firings. Afterward at the lunch time, when this witness entered the Sadar Rifle Battalion, he came to see the dead body of Major Asad. The aforesaid incident has been supported and corroborated by PW 454 Lieutenant Colonel Jahan Ara Begum who has stated in his evidence to the effect that on 25.02.2009, she was present in the Darbar Hall. When a hue and cry was started in the

The Killing of Lieutenant Colonel Md. Lutfar Rahman Commanding Officer (CO) of 24 Rifle Battalion.

It is found from the evidence of  PW 24, Lieutenant Colonel Md. Asif Abdur Rouf that on 25.02.2009 this witness was present at his residence at Pilkhana. At around 10:45 a.m, the residence of this witness was attacked by the BDR rebels. When this witness was compelled to go with the BDR rebels, on the way he came to see Lieutenant Colonel Lutfar Rahman Commanding Officer (CO) of 24 Rifle Battalion to have been thrashed and assaulted by the BDR rebels. He identified Subedar Major Gofran Mollik, Havildar Taher, Lance Naik Karim, Sepoy Emran, Sepoy Aziz, Sepoy Arafat Hossain, Sepoy Mizanur Rahman among the rebels. He also found Subedar Major Gofran Mollik to lead the BDR rebels taking SMG in his hands. Subsequently he came to know that BDR rebels had killed Lieutenant Colonel Lutfar Rahman. Many other BDR rebels being armed with weapons came at the office area of 24 Rifle Battalion. Thereafter, at around 11:00 a.m, they brought out Lieutenant Colonel Lutfar Rahman, Commanding Officer (CO) of 24 Rifle Battalion from his office dragging, beating, humiliating and dishonouring him and took him at the backside of MT line of 13 Rifle Battalion. Sepoy Md. Azim Patowary CS accused No 17, the driver of Lieutenant Colonel Lutfar Rahman tied up the eyes of his own unit’s Commanding Officer (CO) with the red clothes and both hands with rope from the backside. Then Sepoy

The Killing of Major Muhammad Mosharof Hossain

On that fateful day of occurrence at Pilkhana, PW 74 Major Dr. Rownak Azad Anne and Major Mosharof were present in the Darbar Hall. When chaos and disordered situation were started at the Darbar Hall, then Major Doctor Rownak Azad Anne along with Major Mosharof coming out of the Darbar Hall came to the premises of Noor Mohammad Rifles Public School and College running through the field. Major Mosharof went to the tuition fee collection room of the college and took shelter at the tuition fee collection room. Major Mosharraf, Major Doctor Rownak Azad Anne, one Subedar of BDR and 2 civil employees entered the cash counter and took shelter under the box of the counter and shut the door from inside. At about 2:30 p.m-3:00 p:m, 3 armed BDR rebels entered the room breaking open the door and pointed their arms at them. When Sepoy Altaf, Bashar

and others came in front of  PW 74 Major Doctor Rownak Azad Anne, she introduced herself as a lady doctor and told them not to cause any harm to her as she used to provide treatment to them and their wives and children. At that time, they snatched away her mobile phone from her hands and brought out Major Mosharof from the cash box.  The BDR rebels scolded Major Mosharof and other persons stayed therein. However, at one stage, the rebels brought out Major Mosharof of the room and asked him to stand on the veranda moving back. When Major Mosharof moved back, they opened fire at him as a result of which Major Mosharof fell down on the veranda receiving bullet injuries and embraced death instantly. The aforesaid fact of killing has been supported and corroborated by the evidence of PW 56 Major Mohammad Rezaul Karim and the confessional statement of  Sepoy Haider Ali CS accused No.91.

The Killing of Major Abu Syed Gazzali Dastagir

PW 3 Lieutenant Colonel Md. Abu Tasnim has stated in evidence that on 25.02.2009 he was present at the Darbar Hall. At one stage of turbulent situation at the Darbar Hall, DG directed all the concerned commanders to control the troops of the respective units. Getting order from the DG, this witness started for Signal Sector. On his way to Signal Sector, he came to meet Major Mokbul and Major Gazzali near swimming pool. When he came near JCO’s Mess, he came to see 6/7 BDR rebels who were beating Major Gazzali. At that time this witness took shelter beside a building. Subsequently he heard shouting and sound of firings therein. After a while he came out of the hideout and came to see Naib Subedar Fazlul Karim, Havildar Anisuzzaman, Naik Wazed, Sepoy Motiur Rahman and other BDR rebels who were carrying the dead body of Major Gazzali by a jute sack. The aforesaid incident has been partly supported and corroborated by PW 20 Major Kamrul Hasan who saw 6/7 BDR rebels to take Major Gazzali towards the RSB field. He indentified Sepoy Mamun and Naik Wazed among the BDR rebels. The BDR rebels was taking Major Gazzali repeatedly beating him. Apart from the aforesaid evidence,  PW 30 Tarun Kanti Roy has stated in his evidence that on 25.02.2009 at around 12 at noon, when he came in front of the street of Signal Sector, he came to see Naib Subedar Fazlul Karim, Havildar Anisuzzaman and signalman Motiur Rahman who were carrying a dead body in a jute sack along the street of Signal Sector. Subsequently, he came to

The Killing of Doctor Major SAM Mamunur Rahman

It stands out from the evidence of PW 19 Naik Md. Keramot Ali Sheikh that on 25.02.2009 he was present in the Darbar Hall to participate in Darbar. Due to disordered situation at the Darbar Hall, when he was coming from Darbar Hall to his own unit, he came to see many BDR rebels to open fires aiming at the Darbar Hall. Thereafter, he came to his own unit at 24 Rifle Battalion and stayed at the 2nd floor of the soldiers line. While he was staying in the backside of the soldiers line, at around 12 noon, he came to see Lance Naik Mozammel, Sepoy Uttom Barua, Sepoy Jewel, Sepoy Harun, Sepoy Tarequl, Cook Mojibur and other BDR rebels who were taking Doctor Major Mamun towards the north-west corner of the soldiers mess in a humiliating, wounded and bleeding condition beating him repeatedly. This witness came to see that at the order of armed Naib Subedar Islam Uddin, Lance Naik Mozzamel and other BDR rebels killed Doctor Major Mamun opening

The Killing of Colonel Md. Mojibul Haque, Lieutenant Colonel Enayet and Major Mokbul

 It is apparent from the evidence of  PW 26 Havildar Md. Bazlur Rashid that on 25.02.2009 he was present in the Darbar Hall. A disordered situation occurred in the Darbar Hall. At the order of DG, this witness was going to his own unit at 36 Rifle Battalion. On his way to 36 Rifle Battalion, he came to see JCO Subedar Shahidur Rahman, Naik Idris, Naib Subedar Aziz, Naib Subedar Shahjahan, Naib Subedar Saidur Rahman, Naib Subedar Baten, Naib Subedar Kabir Uddin, Naib Subedar Khayer, Naib Subedar Assistant Ali Akbar, Subedar Ekramul Huque, Subedar Abdul Malek, Subedar Bari, Subedar Elias, Havildar Shahjahan, Havildar Yousuf, Havildar Omar, Sepoy Bazlur Rasid, Lance Naik Anowar and others who were counselling with each other. Havildar Major

Shahjalal entered the 4th floor of E Company and asked all them to go out. At that time, Subedar Major Shahidur was found with SMG. After a while, Havildar Omar, Subedar Ekramul, Sepoy Bazlur Rasid, Lance Naik Anowar and others brought Colonel Mujib and Lieutenant Colonel Enayet at the 4th floor. This witness came to see that Colonel Mujib was taken to a room while Lieutenant Colonel Enayet was also taken to another room. Subsequently a hue and cry was heard at the veranda situated in the western side. Thereafter he came to see that Havildar Yousuf, Sepoy Bazlu and Lance Naik Anowar with arms were coming to the east side from the west side. Havildar Yusuf entered into a room wherein Colonel Mojib was kept and opened fire at him by the arms in his hands. Havildar Yusuf and Lance Naik Anowar threw the dead body of Colonel Mojib to the ground from the 4th floor. At that time Lieutenant Colonel Enayet was also killed by the BDR rebels. Thereafter, Subedar Shahid and another also threw the dead body of Lieutenant Colonel Enayet to the ground from the 4th floor. At that time, M.L.S.S. Saifuddin @ Saidul helped the BDR rebels to show Major Mokbul who, at that time, was at the western side of the 2nd floor. Then Sepoy Alim Reza being armed with weapons went to a room at the western side and killed Major Mokbul by opening fire at him. The aforesaid evidence is also supported and corroborated by PW 37 Subedar Sheikh Abdul Quddus who has stated in his evidence that he was Naib Subedar of 36 Rifle Battalion. On 25.02.2009 at 9:40 a.m, hearing sound of firings he came in front of the soldiers line of his unit. A few minutes later, he came to see Lieutenant

Colonel Enayet, the Commanding Officer (CO) of his unit and Colonel Mojibul Haque to come in front of the Battalion running. At that time, Subedar Major Shahidur Rahman, Havildar Omar Ali, Subedar Ekramul Haque, Sepoy Bazlur Rashid, Lance Naik Anwarul Islam and many others took Colonel Mojib and Lieutenant Colonel Enayet at the 4th floor of the soldiers line. Subsequently he came to hear sound of firings from the 4th floor of the soldiers line. During that time, he also came to see MLSS Saifuddin who showed Major Mokbul by shouting and then Sepoy Alim Reza killed Major Mokbul by opening fire on him. After killing the aforesaid 3 officers, their dead bodies were thrown to the ground floor from the 4th floor by the BDR rebels. The aforesaid fact of killing stands supported and corroborated by the confessional statements made by MLSS Md. Saifuddin Miah CS accused No. 88, Havildar Md. Yusuf Ali CS accused No. 75, Naib Subedar Md. Shahjahan Ali CS accused No. 74 and Sepoy Alim Reza Khan CS accused No. 80. It further appears from the confessional statement of Sepoy Alim Reza Khan CS accused No. 80 that he killed Major Mokbul by opening fire on him by the SMG, which is corroborated and supported by PW 37 Naib Subedar Sheikh Abdul Quddus. It is noticeable from the confessional statement of  Havildar Md. Yusuf Ali that CS accused No. 75 that at the order of BHM Shahjalal, the quarter masters of all the companies kept two dead bodies at the water point attached with barbar shop of 36 Rifle Battalion. Then the soldiers namely Syed, Omar, Jalal and Ekram started shouting for removing the dead body from the 36 Rifle Battalion. Then the dead body of Colonel Mojib,

The killing of Lieutenant Colonel Doctor Robi Rahman

It is evident from the evidence of PW 72 Major Farzana Kalam that in order to observe BDR week, 2009, on 25.02.2009, she was at the Darbar Hall. She appeared there at 8:30 a.m and at about 9:00 a.m, the meeting at the Darbar Hall was started and the DG started giving his sermons. After sometimes when he was talking about operation Dal-Vhat programme, at that time a soldier being armed with weapon coming from the western side entered the Darbar Hall and pointed arms at DG BDR. The officers over there caught hold of him. In a moment, a hue and cry was started at the Darbar Hall. Many soldiers started going out through the doors and the window of the Darbar Hall. She along with some officers came towards the stage when firings were started in and around the Darbar Hall. This witness, Lieutenant Colonel Doctor Lutfor Rahman, Lieutenant Colonel Rabi Rahman, Lieutenant Colonel Yasmin and Major Rukhsana were there at the same place. In order to save themselves they took shelter behind the screen of the stage at the south-west corner of the Darbar Hall. DG, DDG, DOT, Captain Majahar, Lieutenant Colonel Kamruzzaman, Central Subedar Major and many others took shelter behind the screen at the other side of the stage. The sound of firings started increasing. The BDR rebels asked all the officers to come out

from behind the screen. At that time at the advice of Lieutenant Colonel Lutfor Rahman, the officers remaining in the south-east corner of the stage started coming out one after another. When they came down from the stage the BDR rebels caught hold of them and brought them out of the Darbar Hall. When they appeared in the middle place of the Darbar Hall, the BDR rebels opened fire at Lieutenant Colonel Kaisar and beat Lieutenant Colonel Lutfor Rahman. They pushed them out through the gate located in the north- east gate of the Darbar Hall. Bringing out from Darbar Hall, they called bad names of the officers and beat them mercilessly. Some of the BDR rebels wanted to take them to the firing squad. Sepoy Selim Reza came there and told them not to kill them as they are lady doctors and also told that they would be needed for their treatment purposes. At that time, this witness

found Major Saleh who came out from the Darbar Hall receiving bullet injury. When a pickup came, the BDR rebels picked her along with Lieutenant Colonel Yasmin and Major Roksana on the pickup. Lieutenant Colonel Rabi Rahman tried to ride on the pickup but the BDR rebels resisted them from riding on the pickup. At the moment of starting the pickup, the aforesaid Lieutenant Colonel Rabi Rahman were able to ride on the pickup but the BDR rebels pushed him down beating him by the bat of a rifle. The pickup came to the Hospital and dropped them thereat. The aforesaid story of beating the Lieutenant Colonel Robi Rahman has been supported and corroborated by the evidence deposed by  PW 73 Lieutenant Colonel Yasmin Akhter and PW 77 Major Rukhsana Khanam.  It may be mentioned that at that time, many army officers were killed by the BDR rebels in front of the fountain adjacent to north-south gate of the Darbar Hall. The dead body of Lieutenant Colonel Robi Rahman was found and recovered from mass grave near mortuary of the hospital and his dead body was identified by  PW 535 Colonel Md. Abdul Alim Tarafder.  

The killing of Major Mohammed Mominul Islam Sarker

It is found from the evidence of PW 15 Sepoy Fazlul Haque that on 25.02.2009 this witness was present in the Darbar Hall. Witnessing the violent situation, he left the Darbar Hall. When he came in the middle place of Sultan ground situated at north-west corner of Babor ground, he came to see Sepoy Masum of 24 Battalion and other BDR rebels namely Lance Naik Ekramul, Sepoy Paltan Chakma, Sepoy Mukul Alam being armed with weapons to come running. At that time, Major Mohammed Mominul Islam Sarker of 24 Battalion was also coming through the way situated in the north side of the pond which is situated at the east side of the Darbar Hall.  As soon as Major Mohammed Mominul Islam Sarker was seen, Sepoy Masum CS accused No. 224 opened fire on him from 25/30 yards away. Major Mohammed Mominul Islam Sarker receiving bullet injury fell down in a moment. It appears from the confessional statement of Sepoy Al Masum CS accused No.224 that at the time of occurrence he took SMG and ammunitions. The confessional statement of this accused indicates that he was the member of unlawful assembly following premeditated conspiracy together with common intention and common object to overthrow the army officers from the BDR force.        

It is noticeable from the confessional statement of Regiment  No. 75336 Sepoy Md. Saiful Islam CS accused No.61 that on 25.02.2009, this accused took one rifle and 20-round bullets from the Kote and Magazine. Then he opened 10-round fires towards the Darbar Hall. At around 10:45 a.m he took stand in the middle place of the main gate and the fountain in front of the Darbar Hall. In that place he found a dead body of an officer lying therein. Sepoy Altaf of 44 Rifle Battalion coming out of the Darbar Hall asked this accused to enter the Darbar Hall. Entering into the Darbar Hall, he took stand in the north corner in the front side of the store. In that time, Sepoy Altaf ordered the army officers to come out maintaining a line/queue. Sepoy Altaf had a megaphone and arms in his hands. Sepoy Altaf ordered the army officers to hand over the mobile phones to them. Thereafter this accused took two mobile phones from two army officers. Sepoy Altaf asked the army officers to go to the west gate maintaining a line. At that time an army officer tried to pick up his stick which was fallen from his hand but Sepoy Altaf threatened him not to pick up the stick saying that there was no necessity of it. Thereafter, the army officers were taken towards the west gate of the Darbar Hall marching them making a queue. Lieutenant Colonel Md. Badrul Huda who was the commanding officer of the former unit of this accused was among the other officers. When the army officers were going out through the door, the BDR rebels opened fires on them as a result of which some officers fell down on the ground

The Killing of an army officer in front of the teachers quarters.

It further seems from the confessional statement of Regiment No. 75336 Sepoy Md. Saiful Islam that on 25.02.2009 at around 11:00 a.m this accused coming out of the Darbar Hall went in front of the quarters of the teachers. This accused entered the residence of the principal of the college in order to see as to whether any officer was in hiding in that place or not. Entering into that residence, this accused found 3 children who took shelter under the Khat/bed out of fear of life. Having asked by this accused, the children replied that their parents had gone outside the house. When this accused was there in the room, Sepoy Jashim of 44 Rifle Battalion and another Sepoy Jashim of Mymensingh Sector entered the room. Sepoy Jashim of Mymensingh Sector had a LMG in his hands and a belt of bullet at his waist. Sepoy Jashim of 44 Rifle Battalion had a rifle in his hands. This accused along with two others went to the roof of a two storied building for taking defence. At around 12:15 p.m, from the roof they came to see an army officer who was being taken away by 3 BDR rebels dragging him. Looking at the aforesaid scenario,

The killing of Lieutenant Colonel Mohammad Sazzadur Rahman, Major Mohammad Maksum- Ul-Hakim and many officers who took shelter in the utensils and beside the utensils in the kitchen attached with Darbar Hall and some officers who took shelter at the bathroom.

It stems out from the evidence of  PW 25 Lieutenant Colonel Md. Iqbal Hasan that on 25.02.2009 he was present in the Darbar Hall. When some BDR rebels under the leadership of Sepoy Selim Reza entered the Darbar Hall, at that time he along with Lieutenant Colonel Badrul went to the green room and came to see some officers who took shelter therein. Within a short period of time, many BDR rebels entered the Darbar Hall as a result which this witness along with Colonel Aftab took shelter behind the big cooking pots coming therein through the ventilator of the washroom. At around 11:00 a.m, he came to hear sound of shooting to someone else. He came to hear sound of killing by opening fire and screaming of the victim officers who took shelter at the bathroom behind him. In the meantime Colonel Reza, Colonel Arefin, Lieutenant Colonel Sazzad and Colonel Zahid also took shelter with them coming through the ventilator of another bathroom. Within a short span of time, an unpleasant and horrible situation engulfed the Darbar Hall. The officers took shelter in the cooking pots kept in the kitchen. When 5/6 BDR rebels entered the kitchen, this witness took shelter beside a cooking pot kept in the kitchen. He identified Sepoy Sazzad, Sepoy Rubel Miah and Sepoy Shahadat. When the aforesaid 3 BDR rebels opened fires on the officers, the officers fell down receiving bullet injuries. When the BDR rebels went out of the kitchen, they addressed one BDR rebel as Sumon and told him to come out quickly. Instead of coming out from that place, Sepoy Sumon of 44 Rifle Battalion pushed some cooking pots as a

From the evidence of  PW 21 Major Syed Monirul Alam, it appears that on 25.02.2009, this witness was present in the Darbar Hall. Due to chaos at the Darbar Hall, the BDR members started going out of the Darbar Hall making a hue and cry. This witness came to see through glasses of window that the BDR rebels being armed with weapons were coming to the Darbar Hall opening fires. At that time DG was encircled by other officers. DG directed all the officers and the BDR members to come back to the Darbar Hall. Then he informed his wife of this matter. Intermittent firings were started around the Darbar Hall. On such situation, in order to save his life he entered the washroom.  He along with Major Maksumul took shelter under the basin. After a few time, 10/12 BDR rebels being armed with weapons entered the Darbar Hall and scolded the army officers with bad languages. Among the BDR rebels, he identified Sepoy Zia and Sepoy Razibul of 44 Rifle Battalion. Subsequently, changing his location he went behind the basin. He understood that BDR officers were being killed. Major Maksumul Hakim was beside him. After a while BDR rebels entered the washroom and uttered whether there were any son of bitch inside the washroom. Then the BDR rebels came to see Major

The Killing of one army officer in front of Shaheed Fazlul Haque English Medium School

Going through the confessional statement of Sepoy Md. Sazzad Hossain CS accused No.10, it appears that on 25.02.2009 at around 9:15 a.m, this accused along with other BDR rebels following the criminal conspiracy along with common intention and common object went to the central quarter guard at Pilkhana, broke open the same and looted arms therefrom. This accused took one SMG, loaded the arms with ammunitions taking from the Magazine, went to the Sultan ground beside the Darbar Hall and opened fires. Then he went towards the Shaheed Fazlul Haque English Medium School and saw one pickup wherefrom the BDR rebels were opening fires towards the Darbar Hall.  At that time one army officer was coming towards them running. The two BDR rebels who were with him opened fire on him and the BDR rebels also told this accused to open fires. He identified one of the two rebels who were with him and his name is sepoy Shahadat who came there to participate in the tattoo show and he was attached with 13 rifle battalion. This accused also opened fires on the army officers at the instruction of two BDR rebels who were with him. The aforesaid army officers were killed by the

The killing of 3 Army officers at Water pump

It is evident from the evidence of PW 36, Cook Md. Amanuddin, who has stated in his evidence that this witness was serving as cook in the house of Lieutenant Colonel Khabir. On 25.02.2009 at about 9:25 a.m he heard sound of firings from the Darbar Hall. In order to know the situation, he went out of the house and started coming towards the west side. When he reached near the water pump located in the south- west side of the Ripocks, the bullets started coming from the Darbar Hall. As a result, he entered the water pump and found 3 army officers who hid themselves there. After 3/4 minutes, No.51148 Lance Naik Hamidul, No. 77867 Sepoy Anisur both of 44 Rifle Battalion, No. 58589 Sepoy Bakibillah of 13 Rifle

Battalion along with 5/6 BDR rebels entered the water pump and brought them out from the water pump at gunpoint and attempted to fire on them. When this witness introduced himself as a cook, one of the BDR rebels thrashed him telling that what he was doing there. In the meantime, Lance Naik Hamidul, Sepoy Anisur Rahman, Sepoy Bakibillah opened fire at 3 officers who receiving bullet injuries fell down on the ground. Out of fear of life, he then came to his officer’s house running. The aforesaid fact of killing is evident from the confessional statement of  Sepoy Shahadat Hossain CS accused No.191 who has stated that Naib Subedar Torab Ali, Havildar Bashar, Naik Mokter and 8/10 BDR rebels took this accused and others at the water pump from the Darbar Hall crossing the field situated at the north side of the Darbar Hall. Going thereat, this accused came to see dead body of 3 army officers with blood tainted BDR uniform on the floor of the water pump house.

The Killing of one army officer on the bank of pond behind the Darbar Hall.

From the confessional statement of  Sepoy Shahadat Hossain CS accused No.191, it appears that Naib Subedar Torab Ali, Havildar Bashar, Naik Mokter and 8/10 BDR rebels took this accused and others at the bank of a pond situated behind the Darbar Hall.  Reaching there, this accused came to see a dead body of one army officer wearing black uniform. Thereafter, at the instruction of Naib Subedar Torab Ali and others they lifted the dead body on the truck.   

The Killing of an army officer near the coconut tree situated at the western side of the dining hall adjacent to cook house behind the soldiers line of 44 Rifle Battalion.

 It appears from the evidence of PW 68 MLSS Md. Razibul Islam that on 25.02.2009, when this witness was at the canteen at around 9:45 a.m to 10:00 a.m, he came to see Sepoy Hashibul Hasan of 44 Battalion who was pulling an officer by holding color of his uniform up to the canteen. At that time, Naik Shahajahan orchestra of that Battalion taking SMG came at that place, exchanged filthy languages coming to the officer and ordered the BDR rebels to kill the officer.  The aforesaid BDR rebels under the leadership of Naik Shahajahan caught and dragged the officer and tied his hands and legs to a coconut tree situated at the western side of the dining hall adjacent to cook house behind the soldiers line. Under the leadership of Shahjahan, the BDR rebels started beating the officer repeatedly. Shahjahan had a SMG with him while a long stick was also found at the hands of BDR rebels. After sometime, a big sound of firing was heard. After a while, he came to see a dead body of an army officer found lying therein. 

The killing of Major Shahnewaz, Major Saleh and one Subedar near gate No.5 of Pilkhana situated at the southern side of the Darbar Hall.

It appears from the evidence of PW 4 Colonel Shamsul Alam Chowdhury that on the date of occurrence on 25.02.2009, one Subedar who was supposed to be promoted as DAD on that day was coming crossing the road situated in front of JCO quarters and beside the southern side of the Darbar Hall. At that time, the said Subedar and two BDR rebels were locked in conflict. At one stage the aforesaid two BDR rebels shot him to death. The said Subedar fell in the ground receiving bullet injuries in a moment. After 5/7 minutes, the three BDR rebels dragged Major Shahnewaz towards gate No.5 of the Pilkhana. When Major Shahnewaz was being taken towards gate No.5 of the Darbar Hall raising his hands, a sound of firing was heard. After a while Major Saleh was also being taken towards gate No.5 by three BDR rebels and then a sound of firing was heard. In that way, one Subedar, Major Shahnewaz and Major Saleh were killed therein and their dead bodies were subsequently recovered from the mass graves.

The Killing of Mrs Naznin Shakil Shipu wife of DG BDR Shakil Ahmed, Lieutenant Colonel Delowar Hossain (Retd) friend of DG BDR, Mrs Delowar, maid servant Kolpana and Gardener Firoj Miah at DG Bungalow.

It is visible from the evidence of  PW 40 Havildar Md. Babul Miah that on 25.02.2009 he was the guard commander of DG Bungalow. On the date of occurrence he took charge from guard commander Havildar Rezaul. As many as 13 guards namely Naik Hasmat, Naik Sanaullah, Lance Naik Mostafa, Sepoy Arshad, Sepoy Zia, Sepoy Mobin, Sepoy Mostafa, Masum, Sumon, Zafar, Kamrul, Hafiz and Monju were also on duty with him. This witness appointed guards at the 3 posts of the DG Bungalow. At 8:00 a.m, the DG went out of the house through Government vehicle and at 8:50 a.m, DG went towards the Darbar Hall and at 9:30 a.m, this witness heard sound of firings from the Darbar Hall. He alerted the guards in that regard. He tried to make communication with Lieutenant Colonel Shams, Commanding Officer of 44 Rifle Battalion over telephone but failed. Subsequently Sepoy Selim Reza, Sepoy Obaidul, Sepoy Ibrahim, Sepoy Altaf, Sepoy Habib, Sepoy Shahin, Sepoy Mohsin, Havildar Jashim and 10/15 BDR rebels came at the DG Bungalow. This witness obstructed the BDR rebels from entering into DG Bungalow as a result of which Sepoy Selim Reza opened fire at him causing grievous injury in his left hip. Receiving injury he fell down on the ground. The BDR rebels entered the DG Bungalow opening fires through the ways. After sometime he heard shoutings and sound of firings from the inside of the Bungalow. Profuse blood came out from the injuries he received. Thereafter, he shouted for help. After a while, a pickup came at the DG Bungalow. Lance Naik Mostafa and Badrul picked him up on the

Habib and another BDR rebel. When they went to the 1st floor, a BDR rebel shot the maid servant from the front side and they also found there one male and one female person in civil dress. Then one of the BDR rebels opened fire on them. Each of this accused and Sepoy Atowar opened one round of fires and they instantly succumbed to the bullet injuries. Subsequently they came to hear that the deceased were of Colonel Delowar (retd) and his wife. Thereafter one of the BDR rebels injured the head of the wife of Colonel Delowar throwing TV on her head. When this accused and other BDR rebels came to the ground floor, they found dead body of DG madam in front of the door of cook house having multiple bleeding and wounding injuries in the different parts of her body. The incident of the aforesaid occurrence partly stands

supported by the confessions of Sepoy Md. Ershad Ali CS accused No.687 and Sepoy Md. Mohsin Ali CS accused No.386. Apart from the aforesaid evidence and materials, PW 536 Brigadier General Waker-Uz-Zaman in his evidence has stated that on 27.02.2009 at 10:30 a.m this witness as Second In Command (2IC) of 17 East Bengal Regiment along with his brigade commander and other army officers entered the Pilkhana. He went to DG bungalow, Darbar Hall and different quarters of the officers. Going at DG bungalow and Darbar Hall, he found many alamots and marks of killing therein. However, he recorded some alamots and marks of killing of DG bungalow in his personal mobile. Subsequently, he converted those scenario into CD. Subsequently, during trial of the case, this witness produced the CD before the court and the same was exhibited as exhibit No. CL XXXIV.  

The Killing of an army officer whose dead body was recovered from the left side of the entry gate of dairy farm

PW 535 Colonel Mohammad Abdul Alim Tafarder has stated in his evidence that on 25.02.2009 he was in charge of Commanding Officer of 17 East Bengal Regiment under 46 Independent Infantry brigade. On 27.02.2009 at around 10:30 a.m, this witness along with his Brigade Commander together with Major Waker, Major Imran, Major Arefen, Major Azad, Captain Saidul, Captain Azmi, Captain Adnan, Captain Reza, Lieutenant Mainul, Lieutenant Asif, Lieutenant Rashed along with 300 hundred officers and soldiers of different ranks and positions entered the Pilkhana premises through gate

No. 4. As follow-up teams, 4 East Bengal Regiment and 2 East Bengal Regiment also entered the Pilkhana. Thereafter, Major Kamrul of 2 East Bengal came to see a dead body of an army officer at the left side of the entry gate of the dairy farm. The dead body could not be identified by that time as the same was distorted one. 

The Killing of Colonel Mohammad Anisuz-Zaman at Darbar Hall area.

The incident of killing of Colonel Mohammad Anisuz-Zaman has been depicted in the confessional statement of Sepoy Md. Obaidul CS accused No. 48 who has stated in his confession that on 25.02.2009 this accused along with Sepoy Selim, Sepoy Habib, Sepoy Ibrahim, Sepoy Atowar, Sepoy Mintu and other BDR rebels entered the Darbar Hall. This accused and BDR rebel Atowar took one rifle and 10-round of bullets each. When they were proceeding towards the Darbar Hall Colonel Anisuzzaman came out of the Darbar Hall. At that time one of the rebels opened fire on Colonel Anisuzzamn as a result of which fell down on the ground. Subsequently, this accused and Sepoy Atowar opened fires on Colonel Anisuzzaman and as a result, Colonel Anisuzzaman succumbed to the bullet injuries.

The Killing of an Army officer whose dead body was recovered from the vehicle of DG BDR.

The evidence of PW 321 Mr. Mirza Azam MP suggest that on 26.02.2009 at 8:00 a.m, this witness and others went to Ambala Restaurant and talked with the BDR rebels over cell phone for resolving the crisis created by the BDR rebels. The BDR rebels spent time telling this and that. Being disappointed, this witness and others talked with the Hon'ble Prime Minister over cell phone at 1:30 p.m. Assessing all the situations, at 2:30 p.m the Hon'ble Prime Minister delivered a speech for the Nation and directed the BDR rebels to surrender immediately with a caution that if the BDR rebels failed to surrender within the time-frame, serious actions would be taken against the BDR rebels. Thereafter, the BDR rebels wanted to surrender. When BDR rebels wanted to surrender, this witness and others went to gate No. 5 of the BDR Headquarters. Thereafter, Hon'ble Home Minister, Finance Minister, Whip Mrs. Amili MP, Mr. Rashed Khan Menon MP, Mr. Hasanul Haque MP, Mrs. Chumki MP, Mrs. Sanjida MP and many others went inside the Pilkhana. Going thereat, this witness along with Mr. Menon MP, Home Minister and State Minister for Law, Justice and parliamentary Affairs riding on a pickup made miking in all the areas of the

Screening of dead bodies of the army officers and causing disappearance of evidence from the place of occurrence.

It appears from the evidence of PW 21 Major Syed Monirul Alam that on 25.02.2009, he was in the Darbar Hall. At one stage, the BDR rebels entered the Darbar Hall with arms and ammunitions and started killing the army officers as a result of which he took shelter in different places of the Darbar Hall and came to see many killings of army officers. This witness in order to save his life took shelter in the drain attached with the Darbar Hall and lay therein. During his stay at the drain, a pickup came in the afternoon. Thereafter, the BDR rebels picked up the dead bodies of army officers on the pickup and took them away from that place. In the night, when this witness was in the drain, some BDR rebels during their conversations said that still there were taints of blood and why the blood was not washed out yet. They ordered some BDR rebels to call NCE members and to wash out the blood from the place of occurrence. Subsequently, NCE members came to the place of occurrence beside the Darbar Hall and washed out the taints of blood. The water mixed blood also fell in his cheek. This witness stayed in the drain till 12:30 a.m on that day.   

From the confessional statement of MLSS Md. Saifuddin Miah CS accused No. 88, it appears that he was in service as MLSS in 36 Rifle Battalion. On 25.02.2009 he was on duty in his office room. In between 9:45 a.m to 9:50 a.m, this witness came to see CO Colonel Enayet, Sector Commander Mujib and Major Mokbul who were being brought towards the office of 36 Rifle Battalion encircling them by 30/35 BDR rebels. Remaining therein he heard sound of firings and saw some massacres committed by the BDR rebels. At one stage, when he went out of the office through the backside he came to see the bleeding and wounded dead bodies of Colonel Mujib and Lieutenant Colonel Enayet. At that time when he was thinking of his departure standing at one side of the veranda. At that time a dead body fell down from the upstairs. He came to see that the dead body was of Major Mokbul. By that time he shouted a lot. At around 11:00/11:30 a.m, this accused saw Havildar Yusuf who came there running from the east side taking SMG in his hands. During his stay at the barrack, he went to drink water and then he came to see Havildar Yusuf along with 4/5 BDR rebels wearing musk, who with the help of leaf of nut tree taking from the dustbin carried the dead bodies of Colonel Mojib, Lieutenant Colonel Enayet and Major Mokbul tying them and picked up the dead bodies

Havildar Md. Yusuf Ali CS accused No.75 in his confessional statement has stated that on 25.02.2009 at about 9:45 a.m, he took one SMG from the Kote of 36 Rifle Battalion and took 30 round of bullets in two Magazines containing 15 round of bullets each. He has categorically stated that he saw the BDR rebels to shoot Lieutenant Colonel Enayet at the 3th floor of 36 Rifle Battalion and this accused killed Colonel Mujibul Haque by opening two round of bullets on him. Thereafter, at the order of BHM Shahjalal, the quarter masters of all the companies kept the aforesaid two dead bodies at the water point attached to barber shop of 36 Rifle Battalion. Many BDR rebels were present there. At the order of EME Subedar (bearded), the aforesaid dead bodies were fallen in the manhole breaking its cover.  After that, Sepoy Alim Reza and MLSS Saifuddin killed Major Mokbul in front of the accused. The dead body of Major Mokbul was kept behind the

Naib Subedar Monoranjon Sarker CS accused No.169 in his confessional statement has stated that on 25.02.2009 at around 5:30 p.m Naib Subedar Torab Ali dropped this accused at the west side of the Darbar Hall by a pickup. Then he was taken inside the Darbar Hall by Naib Subedar Torab Ali. Then he came to see a dead body of DAD Masum in the north side of the stage of the Darbar Hall. Apart from this he came see 4/5 dead bodies therein. This witness saw 3-ton vehicle of BDR in west side of Darbar Hall. He found 25/30 dead bodies in line behind the vehicle. He also came to see two dead bodies in the east side of the bathroom. The BDR rebels were talking about taking the dead bodies at the MT garage. One of the BDR rebels ordered him to catch hold of cloth and then he caught hold of it. Other BDR rebels also caught hold of the cloth in another side. This accused and other BDR rebels caught hold of the cloth so that none could see the dead bodies from the outside. Then the BDR rebels lifted the dead bodies on the vehicle and took away the dead bodies therefrom.

From the confessional statement of  Naib Subedar Wali Ullah CS accused No.183, it appears that on 25.02.2009 at around 3:45 p.m, when he was in duty at ICU of BDR hospital, 3 unknown BDR rebels brought this accused along with Naib Subedar Torab Hossain, Naib Subedar Monoranjon Sarker with 12/15 BDR soldiers at the Darbar Hall by a 3-ton truck. Reaching there, he came to see 20 dead bodies lying outside in the west side of the Darbar Hall. Among the dead bodies, the dead body of DG of BDR was also there. Some unknown BDR rebels ordered this accused and Naib Subedar Torab Hossain to raise the screen up. Then the BDR rebels lifted the dead bodies on the 3-ton truck. Thereafter, this accused along with others carried the dead bodies to MT garage. Then, a pickup of the BDR rebels also came with the truck that carried the dead bodies. At that time this accused recognised Naib Subedar Malaker with arms in that vehicle. At around 6:00 p.m, one unknown BDR rebels told this accused and others to leave the place.      

From the confessional statement of  Havildar Md. Abul Basher CS accused No.178, it appears that on 25.02.2009 at around 3:30 p.m, this accused was at MI room of the BDR hospital. He received the telephone call made by Naib Subedar Medical Assistant Torab Ali who ordered this accused and 10 BTT soldiers to go to the Darbar Hall as quickly as possible. Then this accused went to the soldiers line of the hospital. Thereafter, at the order of Naib Subedar Torab Ali, this accused along with (1) Sepoy Razib Miah (2) Sepoy Rejaul (3) Sepoy Md. Shahadat (4) Sepoy Robiul Alam (5) Sepoy Shahjalal (6) Sepoy Thai Yong Marma and (7) Sepoy Sohel Rana wearing uniform went to the Darbar Hall at 4:45 p.m and reported to Naib Subedar Torab Ali.  Going to the Darbar Hall, he came to see everything broken, profuse blood scattered in different places inside the Darbar Hall and 4/5 dead bodies lying on the floor. Among the dead bodies, the dead body of commandant Colonel Moshiur Rahman of this accused was also there. He could not identify the dead bodies of other officers. Naib Subedar Torab Ali ordered him to lift the dead bodies on the truck

From the confessional statement of  Naib Subedar Torab Hossain CS accused No.181, it is evident that on 25.02.2009, he was present in the Darbar Hall. When chaos and disorder were started in the Darbar Hall, he came to BDR hospital. Then he went to ICU-2 of the BDR hospital. From there, he went to operation theatre (OT). During his standing at the OT, Colonel Yasmin Akhter, Major Rukhsana, Major Farzana and one male doctor entered the OT getting down from the lift. While this accused was getting down from the upstairs and he was going towards the MI room, Sepoy Alauddin aiming arms at him scolded him and compelled him to sit on the pickup. Havildar Humayun was with the pickup. Havildar Humayun then uttered that they needed more people. Sepoy Alauddin then caught and brought Naib Subedar Monoranjon there.  Then this accused and other BDR rebels were taken to gate No.5 of the Darbar Hall and in the middle place of the Darbar Hall and directed to lift the dead bodies on the vehicle. He came to see a 3-ton truck there. At that time, Naib Subedar medical assistant Waliur Rahman came to that place.  Havildar Humayun brought some BDR rebels being armed with weapons and directed them to lift the dead bodies. Sepoy Alauddin took this accused to get no 5 to make a telephone call, when this accused made a telephone call to MI room, Havildar Hashem Sarwar received the phone and then this accused directed him to

From the confessional statement of Naik Mokter Hossian CS accused No.179, it is apparent that on 25.02.2009, while he was at the MI room of BDR hospital, at around 3:00 p.m Naib Subedar Medical Assistant Torab Ali over telephone ordered this accused to send 10 Basic Trade Training (BTT) soldiers with Havildar medical assistant Bashar to the Darbar Hall right that time. This accused was also instructed to go there. Then this accused told him that there were no staffs in the MI room. Naib Subedar Torab Ali then told him to come there as there were no necessity of people in the MI room. At that time this accused started looking for Havildar Bashar and came to hear that Havildar Bashar went to the Darbar Hall taking the soldiers. Then he again returned to MI room. At around 3:30 p.m Naib Subedar Torab Ali directed this accused to go to the Darbar Hall by a phone call which was received by Naik Habib. Following that order, this accused went to the Darbar Hall. Going thereat, he came to see a 3-ton truck of the BDR in the south side of the Darbar Hall. He found 6/7 dead bodies on the truck. This accused also found 4/5 dead bodies lying on the ground. Looking at the dead body lying on the ground, one dead body appeared to him like the dead body of Doctor Lutfor Rahman. Then this accused started looking for Naib Subedar Torab. This accused found Naib Subedar Torab in the north side of the Darbar

Hall. At that time, Naib Subedar Torab along with Havildar Bashar and other BDR rebels was looking for the dead bodies. Looking at this accused Naib Subedar Torab ordered him to stay there.  Thereafter, Naib Subedar Torab taking other BDR rebels went to 3- ton truck. They lifted the dead bodies on the truck by the BTT rebels. After lifting the dead bodies on the truck, this accused and other BDR rebels under the leadership of Naib Subedar Torab Ali went near the water pump situated in the north side of the Darbar Hall, recovered 3 dead bodies from the inside of the water pump and lifted the dead bodies on another pickup van. Another dead body was there in the pickup. An ambulance came with the pickup van and Naib Subedar Medical Assistant Waliullah and others were there sitting inside the ambulance. Under the leadership of Naib Subedar

Medical Assistant Waliullah 3 dead bodies were taken to the east side. Then under the leadership of Naib Subedar Torab Ali, this accused and others started towards the hospital. On the way, Naib Subedar Torab Ali spoke that he had come doing practice of disposal of dead bodies. Then this accused came to the hospital. The aforesaid event of screening off the dead bodies has also been supported and corroborated by the confessional statements of  Sepoy Shahadat Hossian CS accused No.191,  Sepoy Thai Yang Marma CS accused No. 197, Sepoy Razib Mia CS accused No.195, Sepoy Md. Rabiul Alam CS accused No.193 (BTT Soldier), Sepoy Md. Rezaul Islam CS accused No.194 and Sepoy Shahjalal Sikder CS accused No.190.

From the confessional statement of  Havildar Driver Billal Hossain CS accused No.162, it is noticeable that this accused was a member of 15 Rifle Battalion and he was attached with Sadar Rifle Battalion as driver at the time of occurrence.  This accused would drive 3-ton truck No.1470 of the BDR. On 25.02.2009 at around 1:45 p.m, Naik Abdul Latif of MT control room ordered this accused to go to the Darbar Hall with a vehicle as quickly as possible. Thereafter this accused went to the Darbar Hall along the road beside the swimming pool taking a truck being No. Dhaka Metro-N-1470. He took stand in right side of the Darbar Hall crossing the vehicle of DG BDR. At that time, Naik Subedar Monoronjon giving signal by hand directed this accused to go to the gate of the west side of the Darbar Hall. Then he came to see Naib Subedar Wali wearing uniform standing beside Naib Subedar Monoranjon. At the order of Naib Subedar Monoranjon, he

brought the vehicle under the Koroy tree in front of the Darbar Hall pushing back the vehicle from the main road and came to see 15/20 dead bodies of army officers wearing uniform at the vacant place near the Darbar Hall. He also found 7/8 BDR rebels standing wearing musk in the north-west corner of the Darbar Hall. At the order of Naib Subedar Monoranjon and Naib Subedar Wali, the BDR rebels handing over their arms and ammunitions in the hands of one Lance Naik lifted 7 dead bodies on the vehicle of this accused. At that time Naib Subedar Wali embarked on the vehicle and sat on the seat beside this accused and asked him to go towards the hospital road. After coming some ways, Naib Subedar Wali ordered him to stop and then as per instruction, he stopped the vehicle there. Naib Subedar Wali got down from the vehicle instructing this accused to keep the vehicle in the corner of the field of 13 Rifle Battalion. He then went to the barrack keeping the vehicle in the corner of the field of 13 Rifle Battalion. When he was coming carrying the dead bodies at that time he came to see driver Havildar Solaiman along with some BDR rebels being armed with weapons going towards the Darbar Hall crossing him. At around 10:00 p.m MT Naik Abdul Latif again called this accused by a miking from the control room. When there was a delay in coming, another driver Naik Ali Hossain MT section asked this accused to go to vehicle as quickly as possible. At that time there was no electricity in that area. During his movement on the ways, he came to see Subedar Major Zobayer of 13 Rifle Battalion to come to him and then Subedar Major Zobayer ordered him to keep the vehicle in front of the mortuary. Getting instruction, this accused

The aforesaid incident of carrying dead bodies has been supported and corroborated by the confessional statement of Naik Md. Ali Hossain CS accused No.184, who was a member of 1 Rifle Battalion and was attached with Sadar Rifle Battalion as driver at the time of occurrence. On 25.02.2009 Naik Md. Ali Hossain drove 3-ton truck being No. Dhaka metro-E-2-11-0490.  

Dumping of dead bodies of the army officers and others in mass grave (Gono Kabor)

The BDR rebels in collaboration with each other following the criminal conspiracy killed the army officers and others and then they removed the dead bodies from the different places and dumped those dead bodies in mass graves (Gono kabor). The evidence of dumping of the dead bodies has been vividly described by PW 93 Sepoy Md. Shahjahan Ahmed, PW 63 Lance Naik Md. Nazimul Islam, PW 38 Naib Subedar Moniruzzaman, PW 455 Havildar Md. Ashraf Ali, PW 283 Lance Naik Md. Zamal Hossain, PW 341 Havildar Md. Delowar Hossain, PW 322 Lance Naik Assistant Md. Ashraful Alam, PW 71 Naib Subedar Medical Md. Hashim Uddin and PW34 Havildar Md. Abdul Malek.

PW 93 Sepoy Md. Shahjahan Ahmed  has stated in his evidence that on 25.02.2009, he was in service as Sepoy at Rifle Security Unit (RSU), Pilkhana and at that time, he was also the runner of Major Asad. On 25.02.2009 at 1:30 a.m this witness stood on the veranda of the 2nd floor of the Barrack and during that time he came to see JCO Yusuf Ali, Badge No. 5046 along with 3 armed BDR rebels who came at RSU. By that time No. 43347 Havildar Akter, No. 39995 Havildar Zakir, No. 44274 Havildar Ikbal, No. 45596 Naik Kaiyum and No. 53442 Lance Naik Mozammel Haque of RSU invoked the other BDR rebels to come down from the upstairs. Yusuf Ali then told that if the BDR rebels did not get down they would be shot. When he came down from the upstairs, he came to see No. 42947 Havildar Shafiqul, who unlocked the store room of RSU by keys and Naik Kaiyum thereafter took spade and shovel from the store room and put them on the ambulance. At that time JCO-5259 Naib Subader Rafiqul, of RSU was standing thereat. Subedar Yusuf, Habilder Zakir, Naik Kaiyum and other armed BDR rebels picked him up on the ambulance at gunpoint and dropped all of them at the BDR Hospital. He saw 3 vehicles thereat. Going forward a little bit, he found the dead bodies on the 3 vehicles. He came to see to bury the dead bodies

The evidence of burying dead bodies adduced by PW 93 Sepoy Md. Shahjahan Ahmed stands supported and corroborated by  PW 38 JCO-6317 Naib Subedar Moniruzzaman who has stated in his evidence that from 05.2.2007 he was working as instructor at RSU. On 25.02.2009 the regular classes were going on. While classes were going on in the classroom at the 2nd floor of RSU he was supervising class activities as JCO. Before sunset it was known that the BDR rebels had killed many army officers and it was also announced through mike that no BDR members would remain in the Barrack and they also announced directing all the BDR members to take their stand beside the gate and the wall taking arms. It was also announced that if BDR rebels were found without arms he would be finished. This witness went to the west side of RSU canteen. On 25.02.2009 at about 1:00 a.m he saw a ambulance entering RSU premises coming from the side of the Hospital. JCO Subedar Yusuf Ali being armed with weapons came down from the ambulance and with excited voice, he told all the BDR rebels to come down. Then in response to his call, No.45596 Naik Kaiyum, No.51857 Naik Nazrul, No.52602 Mojibur Rahman, JCO-5259 Rafiqul, No.43347 Havildar Akter, No.42947 Shafiqul, No.44274 Masud Iqbal, No.45199 Daud Ali, No.52253 Shahi Akter of RSU along with many others came down with arms and assembled with Subedar Yusuf. The aforesaid Yusuf said that they had killed 50/60 army officers and as such, it would not be wise to keep their dead bodies lying on the earth and those dead bodies would have to be concealed and for concealing the dead bodies, digging of grave in the west side of the Hospital is

PW 341 No. 41794 Havildar Md. Delwar Hossain of 12 BGB has stated in his evidence that on 25.02.2009 he was present in the Darbar. While this witness was at the soldiers line, at around 2300 hours, he felt pain in his chest. He went to the Hospital. Getting no doctor therein, when he was coming back to his respective unit, he came to see many people beside the mortuary of the Hospital and then he went therein. Going therein he found the dead bodies of the army officers. He found DAD Nurul Huda with arms and other BDR rebels who were

digging earth for burring the dead bodies of the army officers. 2/1 BDR rebels were making delay in digging the grave and for that reason DAD Nurul Huda told the BDR rebels that they had killed the army officers by shooting but the BDR rebels were making delay in burring them. DAD Nurul Huda asked them to complete the work quickly. In the evidence of PW34 Havildar Md. Abdul Malek, it is noticeable that on 25.02.2009 this witness was present in the Darbar Hall. Upon hearing of firings of bullets, this witness came to his office building at 13 Rifle Battalion. He heard sound of vehicles whole night from the field of 13 Rifle Battalion. He came to see 2/3 pickups from the balcony. At that time he also found 10/12 BDR rebels talking with each other. He found Subedar Zobayer beside the MT garage. Subsequently 3 trucks came

therein. One of the BDR rebels came down from the vehicle and then talked with Subedar Zobayer. After a while the truck went to the garage. He came to see to bring down the dead bodies from the vehicles whole night and to move the vehicles around that area. In the morning, he came to see some earth beside the MT garage of the 13 Rifle Battalion swelled. Killing the army officers, their dead bodies were buried therein.       

The evidence of aforesaid prosecution witnesses has also been reflected in the confessional statement of No.45596 Naik Md. Abdul Kaiyum CS accused No.165, member of Rifle Security Unit (RSU) who has stated in his confession, inter alia, that on 25.02.2009 at around 10.00 p.m Havildar Masud Iqbal told this accused that Subedar Yusuf wanted some people of RSU. The BDR rebels brought ambulance

in the ground floor and they wanted people for digging graves (Kabor). The BDR rebels would fire if any one refused to go there. Then he came down from the 4th floor. This accused along with Havildar Zakir, Naik Ershadul, Lance Naik Mozammel, Sepoy Shahjahan, Sepoy Saiful, Naik Shahi Akter, Lance Naik Enamul, Havildar Masud, Subedar Yusuf and Naik Nazrul came down and fell in. He came to see an ambulance along with 3/4 BDR rebels there. Subedar wanted belcha, spade and gati for digging earth from Havidar Shafiq who then told about it to storeman Sepoy Selim. Then storeman Sepoy Selim provided belcha, gati, shovel and spade to them. At the order of Subedar Yusuf and Havildar Masud this accused along with Zakir, Enamul, Nazrul, Shahi Akter embarked on the ambulance taking shovel and belcha. The remaining BDR rebels started going on foot. The BDR

rebels being armed with weapons were with them. The ambulance went to the morgue behind the hospital taking this accused and others. Going thereat, he came to see 3/4 BDR rebels with uniform digging the graves (Kabor). At a few distance, he found two 3-ton truck and one pickup containing the dead bodies of the army officers. When the graves were dug with a depth of 1-1½ hands, the BDR rebels who were digging the graves refrained from digging as soon as this accused and other BDR rebels reached there.  Thereafter this accused and others started digging the graves. It took a long time to dig the graves as the soil was very hard and full of concretes. On 26.02.2009 at 4:00 a.m the digging of graves was finished.  One BDR supervised when graves were digging. The place was surrounded by the BDR rebels with arms. Then this accused and other BDR rebels started bringing down the dead bodies from the vehicle. He and BDR rebel Naik Obaidur were at the bottom of the grave. At the time of putting the 1st dead body in the grave, one BDR rebel told that the dead body was of DG. This accused and Naik Obaidur put the dead body at the grave. 3/4 BDR rebels brought dead bodies from the vehicle and this accused and Naik Obaidur put the dead bodies at the grave. In that way, they put in all 35 dead bodies at the same grave. Thereafter this accused along with other BDR rebels buried the dead bodies with mud. Since all the dead bodies were not accommodated in that grave, a pickup taking the remaining dead bodies went towards the 13 Rifle Battalion and the other armed BDR rebels went with the pickup. After burring the dead bodies, he went to the barrack

From the confessional statement of No.44274 Havildar Masud Iqbal CS accused No.164, it appears that this accused lastly joined Rifle Security Unit (RSU) Dhaka zone on 03.12.2008, remained in the Pilkhana and performed his duties as admin. NCO. On 25.02.2009 he was present in the Darbar Hall. On 21.02.2009, he came to know from Naik Zahangir over mobile phone that one leaflet containing the charters of demands was attached beneath the stairs of an old building situated in front of the soldiers line of 24 Rifle Battalion. This accused informed senior JCO Naib Sabedar Rafiqul Islam of the leaflet. Thereafter, this accused along with senior JCO Naib Sabedar Rafiqul Islam went to that place and came to see the leaflet there. Accordingly they informed the Zone Commander Major Hossain Sohel Shahnewaz of the leaflet. Then the Zone Commander directed them to look for the leaflet or poster if any in the other places at the Pilkhana. Getting order they moved and found leaflets from the different places. The leaflet was written addressing the Hon’ble Prime Minister stating some objectionable remarks against the DG and the army officers. On getting leaflet, Zone Commander Major Shahnewaz along with other officers went to the office of commanding officer Lieutenant Colonel Enshad Ibn Amin and therefrom all the officers went to Headquarters. At 2:45 p.m, Major Hossain Sohel Shahnewaz came to his office from the Headquarters

and gave briefing stating that Hon’ble Prime Minister would come at Pilkhana on 24.02.2009 and for that reason, Zone Commander thanked Naik Zahangir for giving information about the leaflet and directed all to perform their duties opening eyes and ears. From that night, the officers and DAD were entrusted with 24 hours duty at Kote and Magazine and the duties of this accused and others were also increased. On 25.02.2009 at about 9:30/9:45 p.m JCO Subedar Yusuf of RSU told this accused to get down from the upstairs. Coming to ground, he came to see one ambulance and 3/4 armed BDR rebels. Subedar Yusuf told him to provide people. At that time he called Naik Kaiyum, Naik Mobarok, Lance Naik Joynal, Lance Naik Abu Hasan, Naik Yunus, Lance Naik Mozibur and Sepoy Kalam to come down standing at the 3rd and 4th floor of RSU building. When Subedar Yusuf

told this accused to provide spade, belcha and gati, he ordered Sepoy Selim (storeman), to provide the same. Subsequently Sepoy Selim and Havildar Shafi provide 10/12 belcha, spade and gati. Thereafter he went to the upstairs and the ambulance went away. In that night he could not sleep. In the morning after announcement of azan, Niak Kaiyum came and told him that the dead bodies of the army officers had been buried. The dead body of the DG was also there. This accused was directed to make a camouflage over the graves taking 6/7 BDR rebels. Thereafter this accused along with Havildar Major Akter and 6/7 trainee BDR’s who came at RSU for training purposes, went to the mortuary behind the hospital. Going thereat, they came to see that the work of burring dead bodies were completed. Thereafter they covered the mass graves (gono kabor) with the broken pieces of bricks, leafs of coconut trees and the dried leafs of mango and blackberry trees making camouflage over the mass graves so that none could understand that there were mass graves in that places.

From the confessional statement of  Naib Subedar Yusuf Ali CS accused No.180, it appears that on 06.02.2009 this accused was in service as Zone Commander at Rajshahi and he became attached with BDR headquarters getting message for the purpose of observing BDR week, 2009. On 24.02.2009, for the purpose of coming of Hon’ble Prime Minister and Home Minister at Pilkhana this accused was in intelligence security duty around the tea break stage and he performed his duty up to 2:00 p.m taking 9 soldiers. On 25.02.2009 this accused was at the 3rd floor of the soldiers barrack up to 8:30 p.m. When he

was going to take dinner towards the JCO mess, a ambulance came and stood there. One of the BDR rebels told by shouting that being entrusted by DAD Nasir he was cleaning the blood from the Darbar Hall but the senior members were sleeping snoring nose. Then that BDR rebels called the name of this accused in harsh voice. This accused went to him and then indentified him as Havildar Yusuf of 36 Rifle Battalion. Havildar Yusuf ordered him to get onto an ambulance giving a stroke of SMG at his belly. By that time he was also calling Subedar Mostafa. Thereafter he embarked on the vehicle and the same was stopped at the morgue of the hospital coming beside the 36 Rifle Battalion. Pointing at two 3-ton trucks (big size) and one pickup, Havilder Yusuf told this accused that all the dead bodies were there on the vehicles. Giving a focus of light on a dead body by a small torch light, Havildar Yusuf told this accused that the dead body was of DG. He came to see that maximum dead bodies were there without any dress. The dead bodies were found wearing long underwears and Guernseys. Havildar Yusuf uttered that DAD Nasir had ordered him to burn down the dead bodies along with vehicles pouring patrol taking them in the field of 13 Rifle Battalion. This accused then told Havildar Yusuf that the dead bodies of Muslims could not be burned down in that way. After that this accused again came back to the morgue. Havildar Yusuf told him to provide some people. Then he went to RSU by a vehicle and told Havildar Masud to provide 10/12 people. Thereafter he along with 10/12 people came back to morgue of the hospital. Coming thereat he

Recovery of dead bodies from the mass graves (Gono Kabor) by the people of Fire Brigade and others.

It may be mentioned that the BDR rebels following pre-planned criminal conspiracy together with common intention and common object barbarously killed 74 persons including 57 army officers in and around the Darbar Hall and different places at Pilkhana and then carried the dead bodies to mass graves using trucks and pickups. Thereafter the BDR rebels concealed the dead bodies in mass graves and kept the mass graves under camouflage spreading the broken pieces of bricks, leafs of coconut trees and the dried leafs of mango and blackberry trees over the mass graves so that the same could not be traced out. On 27.02.2009 at around 10:30 a.m, the Commanding Officer of 17 East Bengal Regiment under 46 Independent Infantry Brigade along with other army officers and troops entered the Pilkhana premises in order to carry out search rescue operation. Before entering of Army, the personnel of Fire Service, Police, RAB and the Intelligence Organizations were there at Pilkhana. As per evidence of PW 535 Colonel Md. Abdul Alim Tarafder, when the officers and troops of 4 East Bengal and 2 East Bengal as a follow up team of 17 East Bengal entered the Pilkhana, Major Kamrul of 2 East Bengal found a dead body in the left side of the entry gate of the dairy farm but the said dead body could not be identified as the same was decomposed. After the occurrence, on 27.02.2009  PW 536 Brigadier General Waker-Uz-Zaman, Second In

beside the mortuary. Among them, he identified Colonel Moshiur, DAD Masum, Lieutenant Colonel Earshad, Lieutenant Colonel (illegible), Major Rafique, Major Haider, Major Khalid, Colonel Nakib, Colonel Reza, Lieutenant Colonel Robee, Colonel Imam and Major Mosaddek.  In the next day on 28.02.2009, he discovered 3 more mass graves beside the mortuary. He recovered 4 dead bodies from the 1st mass grave, 4 dead bodies from the 2nd mass grave and 2 dead bodies from the 3rd mass grave. He also recovered dead bodies of Major Mahabub, Major Mosharaf and Major Mokbul therefrom. He also recovered the dead body of Begum Naznin Shakil. Her dead body was wrapped by the curtain of the residence of DG. On 28.02.2009, he again started search for the dead bodies after the sunset. The evidence with regard to recovery of dead

bodies from the mass graves has also been supported and corroborated by  PW 385 Md. Abdur Rashid, Deputy Director, Fire Service, PW 386 Masudur Rahman, Deputy Assistant Director, Fire Service, PW 387 Quazi Amzad Hossain, Station Officer, Fire Service, PW 390 Md. Tanharul Islam, Ware House Inspector, Fire Service, PW 391 Md. Milon Gazi, Fire man, Fire Service, PW392 Md. Abul Khaiyer, Diver, Fire Service and PW393 Md. Masudur Rahman, Fire man, Fire Service.

The evidence in respect to recovery of 8 dead bodies from the mortuary of the BDR hospital has been supported and corroborated by the evidence of PW535 Colonel Md. Abdul Alim Tarafder. Out of 38 dead bodies recovered from the largest mass grave (Gono Kabor),  PW 535 Colonel Md. Abdul Alim Tarafder identified 30 dead bodies and he failed to identify the remaining 8 dead bodies as those were decomposed. This witness also identified 6 dead bodies out of 8 dead bodies recovered from the mortuary of BDR hospital and he could not identify 2 dead bodies as the same were decomposed. Further this witness identified 5 dead bodies out of 10 dead bodies recovered from 3 mass graves (Gono Kabor) in the west side adjacent to MT garage of 13 Rifle Battalion. Apart from the aforesaid evidence of recovery of dead bodies from the mass graves, two dead bodies were recovered from the 1st floor of the residence of DG and one dead body from the drain, which was recovered by a driver. In this regard, PW384 Dilip Kumar Ghosh, Assist. Director of Fire Service has stated in his evidence that on 26.02.2009 in the afternoon at 5:30 p.m, under the leadership of one Monir Hossain, Assistant Director of

      The names of the army officers whose dead bodies were recovered from the largest mass grave and identified by  PW 535 Colonel Md. Abdul Alim Tarafder are as follows:- 

  1.            BA-1439 Major General Shakil Ahmed, ndc, psc, Director General, BDR.
  2.            BA-2441 Colonel Md. Akhter Hossain, psc, G+, Sector Commander, Chittagong.
  3.            BA-2508 Colonel Shamsul Arefin Ahmed, psc, Sector Commander, Kustia.
  1.            BA-2601 Colonel Md. Shawkat Imam, psc, G+, Sector Commander, Khagrachari.
  2.            BA-2440 Colonel Md. Rezaul Kabir, afwc, Director (Admin), Administrative Directorate.
  3.            BA-2409 Colonel Md. Naqibur Rahman, psc, Sector Commander, Comilla.
  4.            BA-2446 Colonel Nafiz Uddin Ahmed, psc, Commandant Rifle Training Centre and School (RTC&S).
  5.            BA-2526 Colonel Kazi Moazzem Hussain, psc, Sector Commander, Rangamati.
  6.            BA-2324 Colonel Mohammad Moshiur Rahman, psc, Director of Communication Directorate, Dhaka.
  7.      BA-2669 Colonel Md. Emdadul Islam, psc, Sector Commander, Khulna.
  8.      BA-2449 Colonel Quazi Emdadul Haque, psc, Sector Commander, Rajshahi.
  1.      BA-118018 Doctor Lieutenant Colonel Quazi Robee Rahman, Dental Surgeon, BDR Hospital, Dhaka.
  2.      BA-10086 Doctor Lieutenant Colonel Lutfar Rahman Khan, Psychology Specialist, BDR Hospital, Dhaka.
  3.      BA-2806 Lieutenant Colonel Md. Lutfar Rahman, psc, CO of 24 Rifles Battalion, Dhaka.
  4.      BA-2353 Lieutenant Colonel Md. Badrul Huda, CO of 13 Rifles Battalion Dhaka.
  5.      BA-2516 Lieutenant Colonel Md. Saiful Islam @ Saif @ Shahid, GSO-1 (Ops) Operation and Training Directorate, Dhaka.
  6.      BA-1891 Lieutenant Colonel Enshad Ibn Amin, G+, CO of Rifles Security Unit, Dhaka.
  7.      BA-3445 Major Humayun Haider, psc, Int Officer, 36 Rifle Battalion, Dhaka.
  1.      BA-3453 Major Md. Azharul Islam, psc, Second In Command(2IC), 23 Rifle Battalion, Khulna.
  2.      BA-2847 Major Mohammed Saleh, DAAG Administration, Dhaka
  3.      BA-4233 Major Mohammad Maksum-Ul-Hakim, Ops Officer, 24 Rifle Battalion, Dhaka.
  4.      BA-3393 Major Mustaque Mahmud @ Mahmud, psc, Second In Command(2IC), Sadar Rifle Battalion, Dhaka.
  5.      BA-3191 Major Mahmood Hasan, GSO-2 Sector HQ, Dhaka
  6.      BA-3396 Major Mahmudul Hasan, GSO-2 (Intelligence), Operation and Training Directorate, Dhaka.
  7.      BA-3716 Major Mahbubur Rahman.
  8.      BA-4098 Major Md. Mizanur Rahman, GSO-2 (Training) Training Branch, Dhaka.
  1.      BA-2711 Major Quazi Mosaddek Hossain, Second In Command (2IC), 33 Rifles Battalion.
  2.      BA-3689 Major Md. Khalid Hossain, GSO-2 (Cods), Secretary of Director General, Dhaka.
  3.      BA-4762 Major Md. Rafiqul Islam, JAG Head Quarters, BDR, Dhaka.
  4.      RDO-161 DAD Masum Khan, A RO, Recordss Wing.

      The 8 dead bodies which were recovered from the largest mass grave could not be identified by PW 535 Colonel Md. Abdul Alim Tarafder as the same were decomposed.

The names of the army officers and others whose dead bodies were recovered from the mortuary of the BDR hospital and identified by PW 535 Colonel Md. Abdul Alim Tarafder are as follows:-  

  1.            BA-3550 Major Md. Humayun Kabir Sarker, GSO-2 (Ops), Training Directorate, Dhaka.
  2.            RDO-87 AD Khandaker Abdul Awal, DAA And QMG, Dhaka Sector.
  3.            JCO-4377 Subedar Assistant Md. Abul Kasem, Head Assistant, Admin. Branch.
  4.            Naik Assistant-60835, Md. Boshir Uddin, Clerk Q and Ord Branch.
  5.            Lance Naik-51932 Md. Manik Miah, 36 Rifles Battalion.
  6.            Sepoy-66524 Ruhul Amin @ Bulbul, 37 Rifles Battalion.

      The 2 dead bodies which were recovered from the mortuary of the BDR hospital could not be identified by PW 535 Colonel Md. Abdul Alim Tarafder as the same were decomposed.

The names of the army officers and others whose dead bodies were recovered from the 3 mass graves situated at the west side of the field adjacent to MT garage of 13 Rifle Battalion and identified by PW 535 Colonel Md. Abdul Alim Tarafder are as follows:-  

  1.            BA-5306 Major Muhammad Mosharof Hossain, ATO Q and Ord Branch, Dhaka.
  2.            BA-2480 Major Md. Mokbul Hossain, Second In Command(2IC), 36 Rifles Battalion, Dhaka.
  3.            BA-4711 Major Syed Md. Idris Iqbal, Operation Officer-30 Rifle Battalion, Panchari, Khagrachari
  4.            BA-2624 Major Hossain Sohel Shahnewaz, ZSO, Dhaka.
  5.            Mrs. Naznin Shakil Shipu (Wife of DG BDR) The 5 dead bodies which were recovered from the 3 mass graves situated at the west side of the field adjacent to MT garage of 13 Rifle Battalion could not

be identified by PW 535 Colonel Md. Abdul Alim Tarafder as the same were decomposed.

It may be mentioned that the dead bodies which were not identified by PW 535 Colonel Md. Abdul Alim Tarafder were subsequently identified by the relatives of deceased and DNA test. The names of the army officers and others whose dead bodies were identified by DNA test as per evidence of PW 317 Professor Doctor Sharif Akhteruzzaman are as follows:-

  1.            BA-2527 Colonel Gulzer Uddin Ahmed, BPM (Bar), psc, Sector Commander, Sylhet.
  2.            BA-2358 Lieutenant Colonel Elahi Monzoor Chowdhury, SG Administration Branch, Dhaka.
  3.            BA-2790 Major Ahmed Azizul Hakim, DAQMG Protection and Construction Branch, Dhaka.
  1.            RDO-171 DAD Md. Fosi Uddin, GSO-3 (Cods), Deputy Direct General Office.

The BDR rebels made ruthless massacres in and outside the Darbar Hall and atrociously and barbarously killed 57 army officers, 9 BDR members, 7 civilians and one army person. The names of the martyred army officers are as follows:- 

  1.            BA-1439 Major General Shakil Ahmed, ndc, psc, Director General, BDR.
  2.            BA-1892 Brigadier General Mohammad Abdul Bari, ndc, psc, Deputy Director General, BDR.
  3.            BA-1480 Colonel Md. Mojibul Haque, Sector Commander, Dhaka Sector.
  4.            BA-1931 Colonel Mohammad Anisuz-Zaman, ndc, Director of Operation and Training Directorate, Dhaka.
  1.            BA-2324 Colonel Mohammad Moshiur Rahman, psc, Director of Communication Directorate, Dhaka.
  2.            BA-2409 Colonel Quadrat Elahi Rahman Shafique, ndc, psc, Sector Commander, Dinajpur.
  3.            BA-2441 Colonel Md. Akhter Hossain, psc, G+, Sector Commander, Chittagong.
  4.            BA-2440 Colonel Md. Rezaul Kabir, afwc, Director (Admin), Administrative Directorate.
  5.            BA-2446 Colonel Nafiz Uddin Ahmed, psc, Commandant Rifle Training Centre and School (RTC&S).
  6.      BA-2449 Colonel Quazi Emdadul Haque, psc, Sector Commander, Rajshahi.
  7.      BA-2487 Colonel BM Zahid Hossain, psc, Sector Commander, Mymensingh.
  8.      BA-2508 Colonel Shamsul Arefin Ahmed, psc, Sector Commander, Kustia.
  1.      BA-2409 Colonel Md. Naqibur Rahman, psc, Sector Commander, Comilla.
  2.      BA-2526 Colonel Kazi Moazzem Hussain, psc, Sector Commander, Rangamati.
  3.      BA-2527 Colonel Gulzer Uddin Ahmed, BPM (Bar), psc, Sector Commander, Sylhet.
  4.      BA-2601 Colonel Md. Shawkat Imam, psc, G+, Sector Commander, Khagrachari.
  5.      BA-2669 Colonel Md. Emdadul Islam, psc, Sector Commander, Khulna.
  6.      BA-2770 Colonel Md. Aftabul Islam, psc, Sector Commander, Rangpur.
  7.      BA-100310 Colonel Md. Zakir Hossain, Dph, M.Phil, Director, Medical Services, Medical Directorate, Dhaka.
  8.      BA-1891 Lieutenant Colonel Enshad Ibn Amin, G+, CO of Rifles Security Unit, Dhaka.
  1.      BA-1969 Lieutenant Colonel Shamsul Azam, psc, CEME, EME Branch, Dhaka.
  2.      BA-2296 Lieutenant Colonel Golam Kibria Mohammad Niamatullah, psc, G, SRO Records Wing, Pilkhana, Dhaka.
  3.      BA-2353 Lieutenant Colonel Md. Badrul Huda, CO of 13 Rifles Battalion Dhaka.
  4.      BA-2358 Lieutenant Colonel Elahi Monzoor Chowdhury, SG Administration Branch, Dhaka.
  5.      BA-2369 Lieutenant Colonel Md. Enayetul Haque, psc, CO of 36 Rifles Battalion, Dhaka.
  6.      BA-2452 Lieutenant Colonel Abu Musa Md. Ayub Kaiser, psc, AQMG (Construction), Dhaka.
  7.      BA-2516 Lieutenant Colonel Md. Saiful Islam, GSO-1 (Ops) Operation and Training Directorate, Dhaka.
  1.      BA-2806 Lieutenant Colonel Md. Lutfar Rahman, psc, CO of 24 Rifles Battalion, Dhaka.
  2.      BA-3292 Lieutenant Colonel Mohammad Sazzadur Rahman, ADOS Q and Ads Branch, Dhaka.
  3.      BA-118018 Lieutenant Colonel Quazi Robee Rahman, Dental Surgeon, BDR Hospital, Dhaka.
  4.      BA-10086 Lieutenant Colonel Lutfar Rahman Khan, Psychology Specialist, BDR Hospital, Dhaka.
  5.      BA-2480 Major Md. Mokbul Hossain, Second In Command(2IC), 36 Rifles Battalion, Dhaka.
  6.      BA-2605 Major Md. Abdus Salam Khan, Records Officer-2 Records Wing, Dhaka.
  7.      BA-2624 Major Hossain Sohel Shahnewaz, ZSO, Dhaka.
  8.      BA-2711 Major Quazi Mosaddek Hossain, Second In Command (2IC), 33 Rifles Battalion.
  1.      BA-2790 Major Ahmed Azizul Hakim, DAQMG Protection and Construction Branch, Dhaka.
  2.      BA-2847 Major Mohammed Saleh, DAAG Administration, Dhaka
  3.      BA-3190 Major Kazi Ashraf Hossain, Ops Officer, 13 Rifels Battalion
  4.      BA-3191 Major Mahmood Hasan, GSO-2 Sector HQ, Dhaka
  5.      BA-3393 Major Mustaque Mahmud, psc, Second In Command(2IC), Sadar Rifle Battalion, Dhaka.
  6.      BA-3396 Major Mahmudul Hasan, GSO-2 (Intelligence), Operation and Training Directorate, Dhaka.
  7.      BA-3445 Major Humayun Haider, psc, Int Officer, 36 Rifle Battalion, Dhaka.
  8.      BA-3453 Major Md. Azharul Islam, psc, Second In Command(2IC), 23 Rifle Battalion, Khulna.
  1.      BA-3550 Major Md. Humayun Kabir Sarker, GSO-2 (Ops), Training Directorate, Dhaka.
  2.      BA-3689 Major Md. Khalid Hossain, GSO-2 (Cods), Secretary of Director General, Dhaka.
  3.      BA-3716 Major Mahbubur Rahman.
  4.      BA-4098 Major Md. Mizanur Rahman, GSO-2 (Training) Training Branch, Dhaka.
  5.      BA-4233 Major Mohammad Maksum-Ul-Hakim, Ops Officer, 24 Rifle Battalion, Dhaka.
  6.      BA-4711 Major Syed Md. Idris Iqbal, Operation Officer-30 Rifle Battalion, Panchari, Khagrachari.
  7.      BA-4762 Major Md. Rafiqul Islam, JAG Head Quarters, BDR, Dhaka.
  8.      BA-5108 Major Abu Syed Ghazzali Dastagir, OIC, Eastern Desk RSU, Dhaka.
  9.      BA-5306 Major Muhammad Mosharof Hossain, ATO Q and Ord Branch, Dhaka.
  1.      BA-5344 Major Mohammed Mominul Islam Sarker, Int Officer, 24 Rifle Battalion, Dhaka.
  2.      BA-5558 Major Mostafa Asaduzzaman @ Asad, Ops Officer, 11 Rifle Battalion, Ramgarh.
  3.      BSS-100894 Major S A M Mamunur Rahman, DADMS, Medical Directorate, Dhaka.
  4.      BA-5987 Captain Mohammad Tanvir Haider Noor, Adjutant, 34 Rifles Battalion Rangpur.
  5.      BA-6119 Captain Md. Mazharul Haider, ADC to DG BDR, Dhaka.

The names of 9 BDR members who were killed by the BDR rebels during occurrence at Pilkhana are as follows:-

  1.               RDO-87 AD Khandaker Abdul Awal, DAA And QMG, Dhaka Sector.
  2.               RDO-161 DAD Masum Khan, A RO, Records Wing.
  1.            RDO-171 DAD Md. Fosi Uddin, GSO-3 (Cods), Deputy Direct General Office.
  2.            JCO-3849 Subedar Major Md. Nurul Haque, Central Suberdar Major, Pilkhana, Dhaka.
  3.            JCO-4377 Subedar Assistant Md. Abul Kasem, Head Assistant, Admin. Branch, Pilkhana, Dhaka.
  4.            Naik Assistant-60835 Md. Boshir Uddin, Clerk Q and Ord. Branch, Pilkhana, Dhaka.
  5.            Lance Naik-51932 Md. Manik Miah, 36 Rifles Battalion, Pilkhana, Dhaka.
  6.            Sepoy-66524 Ruhul Amin @ Bulbul, 37 Rifles Battalion.
  7.            M-163 Mali Md. Firoz Miah, BDR Sector Sadar Doptor, Rangpur (Attach Sadar Rifles Battalion)

The names of 7 Civilians who were killed by the BDR rebels are as under:-

  1. Lieutenant Colonel (Rtd) Delowar Hossain
  1. Mrs. Naznin Shakil Shipu (Wife of DG BDR)
  2. Rowsuni Fatema Akter Lovely (Wife of Lieutenant Colonel (Rtd) Delowar Hossain)
  3. Maid Servant Kolpana Begum who was working at DG Bangalow.
  4. Ridoy Bepary (Vegetable Seller)
  5. Tareq Aziz (student)
  6. Amzad Hossen (Rickshaw Puller)

The name of an army person who was killed by the BDR rebels is as follows:- 1.  Sainik Md. Jahirul Islam, 43 Engineer Battalion.

Summary of the killings

  1. Army Officers - 57
  2. BDR Persons - 09
  3. Civilians   - 07
  4. Army person - 01 In total   -  74

The BDR rebels created a reign of terror in the Pilkhana premises by killing the innocent officers and also causing aimless firings and continued their violent acts till the night of 26th February, 2009. The general civilians living around the Pilkhana area were also traumatized by indiscriminate firings of BDR rebels. Many disgruntled BDR rebels participated in the killing and atrocities sharing their common intention and common object with the masterminded BDR rebels. The prosecution witnesses in their evidence disclosed the names of the BDR rebels and narrated how the BDR rebels committed offences during the commission of BDR revolt at Pilkhana. The aforesaid fact of killing along with other offences has been vividly described in the confessional statements made by as many as 538 accused. Subsequently, on the same day, the BDR revolt were also accelerated and spread over in different BDR establishments across the country. The barbarous atrocities of the BDR rebels were exposed to the Nation with the greatest sorrow and sudden shock to all when the dead bodies of army officers were recovered from drains, manholes and mass graves (Gano Kabar at Pilkhana). The BDR rebels outside Dhaka ignored all the orders of the Commanding Officers. In spite of the order and call of the Commanding Officers directing the BDR members to remain calm and discipline within the chain of command, the BDR rebels broke open the armoury and Magazine, looted arms and ammunitions, chased some army officers to kill, kept some officers under hostage, burnt and looted properties of the army officers and their family members and created panic to the neighbouring place and people by opening indiscriminate firings.

The BDR rebels atrociously killed 74 people out of them 57 were high ranking, upright, brilliant, prospective and promising army officers including DG BDR, an officer of rank of Major General, who were valuable and precious assets of the Nation and who could glorify the country to a great extent if they would be alive. The army officers sustained injuries of bullets and bayonets of different shapes and sizes caused by the BDR rebels. The BDR rebels also ransacked, destroyed, and set fire to the army officer's private properties namely private cars and household valuable goods. They also vandalized and damaged the Government's properties including Government's vehicles and other valuable materials at Pilkhana. They also held army officer's family members and their children under hostage at gunpoint and put them under fear in quarter guard causing serious trauma on their minds.

Evidence with regard to post mortem reports of the dead bodies and the name of the witnesses who identified the dead bodies and made the inquest reports.

  1.            The dead body of DG BDR  BA-1439 Major General Shakil Ahmed was identified by PW 212 Major SM Moniruzzaman and the inquest report was prepared by PW 165 Md Imran Hossian, Sub Inspector, Lalbag Police Station. The post mortem on the dead body was done by PW 306 Doctor AKM Shafiuzzaman and the post mortem report was exhibited as exhibit-271 and his signature was exhibited as exhibit-271/1.

The findings of the post mortem report are reproduced verbatim:-

(I)  Bullet  injury-(a)  Entry-One  entry  bullet  wound measuring 1"x1 " found on the left side of the upper

2  2

neck e lies just below the left angle of the mandible (b) Exit wound- measuring 1"x12 " found on the left

side of the face e in 3  inch below the left Zygomatic

4

bone  (c)  Direction-Directed  upwards  &  medially. During  its  course-it  has  perforated  skin  soft  tissue muscle & injury or fracture to the left angle of the mandible  (2) Entry  –(a)  One   entry  bullet  wound measuring 1 "x12 " found in the right upper chest ē lies

2

11 " inch right from mid line & lies at the 5th ant

2

intercostal space (b) exit - One exit wound measuring 11 "x1" e lies middle of the left lateral side of the

2

abdomen e lies 9 1 inch left from mid line & 5 inch

2

above  from  left  Iliac chest  (c)  Direction-  obliquely founds medially & to the left. During its course it has

perforated skin, soft tissue muscle right lung, small intestine & large intestine & 5th ribs of right sides. (3)

(a)    Entry- One entry bullet wound in the left side of the lower chest e lies 1 inch below from left muscles 5 inch left from midline measuring 1 "x12 " (b) Exit-One

2

exit wound measuring 1"x1 " found in the back of the

2

left lower chest e lies 3 inch left from mid line (c) Direction-Directed  forwards,  upwards  obliquely  & medially  to  the  right.  During  its  course  it  has perforated  skin,  soft  tissue,  muscle,  left  4th  6th  ribs (upper margin), Lt. lung, heart & 8th ribs of Lt side of the back of the chest. (4) (a) Entry-One entry bullet wound measuring 1 "x1 " found in the right side of the

2 2

upper abdomen e lies 5 inch right from midline (b) Exit-One exit wound measuring 1"x1" found on the

2

back of the right side of the abdomen e lies 1 inch

right from midline (c) Direction-Directed forwards & backwards, During its course it has perforated, skin, soft tissue, muscle, liver, & larger intestine. (5) Entry- One entry bullet wound measuring 1 "x12 " found on the

2

middle of the chest e lies just below the Xiphisternum.

(b)  Exit-One exit wound found in the back of the right chest e lies 1 inch right from midline & the Rt 8th intercostal  space  (c)  Direction-Directed,  forwards, upwards backwards & to the right. During its course it has perforated, skin, soft tissue, muscles right lung & 8th ribs of back right side. (6) Entry-One entry bullet wound  found  in  the  medial  aspect  of  the  left  arm measuring 1 ʺx13 ʺ e lies 3 inch above from Lt elbow

3

joint (b) Exit wound-One exit wound measuring 3 " x1

4 2

"   found in the anterior lateral aspect of the left upper arm e lies 4 inch below from left shoulder joint (c) Direction-Directed obliquely upwards & to the right. During its course it has perforated, skin, soft tissue & muscle. Mentioned injury are ante-mortem. Liquid & clotted blood found in the thoracic & abdominal cavity which was ante-mortem. Ante-mortem congestion found in the mentioned wound. 

The opinion of the doctor is reproduced verbatim:-

The cause of death was due to haemorrhage followed by shock as a result of above mentioned bullet injury which was ante-mortem & homicidal in nature.

  1.            The dead body of BA-1892 Brigadier General Mohammad Abdul Bari was identified by wife of the deceased, Mrs. Farhana Bari and the inquest report was prepared by  PW-179 Md Shahinur Rahman, Sub Inspector, Lalbag Police Station. The post mortem on the dead body was done by PW 260 Doctor Md Habibuzzaman  and  the  post  mortem  report  was exhibited  as  exhibit-218  and  his  signature  was exhibited as exhibit-218(1).

The  findings  of  the  post  mortem  report  are reproduced verbatim:-

Entry wound:

(1)      On  the  sub  mental  region  side  2 ″x 2 ″x  cranial

3 3

cavity deep edge inverted.

(2)    On the left shoulder 12 ″x1 ″x through & through- 2

edge is inverted. 

Exit wounds:

(1)  On the occipital region 3″x3″. Edge is everted.

(2)  On the dorsal aspect of the left. Shoulder 2″x2″- edge is everted.

Entry  wounds on  the  rt.  arm 1 ″x1  &  exit  wound

3 3

5″x3″ on the medial aspect of the rt. arm with fracture of the rt. humours.

The opinion of the doctor is reproduced verbatim:-

The death is due to shock resulted from brain injury  caused  by  bullet  (fire  arm)  which  is  ante- mortem & homicidal in nature.

  1.            The  dead  body  of  BA-1480  Colonel  Md. Mojibul  Haque  was  identified  by  PW251  BJO- 20780 SWO Komol Kanti Das and the inquest report was  prepared  by  PW164  Md  Sarwar  Alam,  Sub Inspector, Kotoali Police Station. The post mortem on the dead body was done by PW271 Doctor Snigdha Sarker and the post mortem report was exhibited as exhibit-221 and his signature was exhibited as exhibit- 221(1).

The  findings  of  the  post  mortem  report  are reproduced verbatim:-

(A) Bullet injury (1) (a) entry wound on the chin 1″ rt. to midline measuring 1 in diameter having inverted &

3

circular margin (b) Exit wound 2″ above rt. ear. 5″ from occipital measuring 21 ″x1″ having everted &

2

irregular  margin  (c)  Direction  &  dissection.  From below upwards laterally & backwards causing injury

&    Perforation skin, soft tissue, bones, brain & cavity brain to expelled out. (2) Entry wound 1 ″ above the

2

umbilicus & 41 ″ from rt subcostal margin measuring 14

2

   in diameter having inverted margin (b) Exit wound on the back 4″ B + to midline at the level of L4 having everted  margin  measuring  2″x 1   (c)  direction  &

2

dissection  front  to  backward  &  medially  causing perforation of skin soft tissue & small intestine. (3) (a) entry  wound  3″  above  the  umbilicus  &  2″  from midline having 13 ″ in diameter & inverted margin (b)

Exit wound on the back 3″ from midline & 21 ″ from

2 subcostal margin having everted margin (c) Direction

&   dissection: From front to backwards & downwards causing  injury  to  small  intestine.  (4)  (a)  entrance wound on the abdomen 3″ rt to umbilicus & 4″ below subcostal  margin 1  in  diameter  having  inverted  &

3

circular margin (b) Exit wound: On the back 6″ below subcostal margin & 21 ″ from midline (c) Direction &

2

dissection:  Front  to  back  medially  &  downwards causing injury to skin, soft tissue & liver. (B) Post mortem abrasion of the back of the body & extremities

(c)    Lacerated wound above left eye brow measuring 1″x1 ″ (D) A stab wound on the left thigh 5″below the

2

lt.  arm  sup.  iliac  spine  &  6″  above  the  patella measuring 412 ″x3″ causing injury to skin & soft tissue.

The opinion of the doctor is reproduced verbatim:-

The  death  was  due  shock  &  haemorrhage resulting from above mentioned bullet injuries which was ante-mortem & homicidal in nature.

  1.            The dead body of BA-1931 Colonel Mohammad Anis-Uz-Zaman was identified by the brother-in-law of  the  deceased,  Samsul  Islam  and  Doctor  Atiar Rahman. The inquest report was prepared by PW-169 Md Nurul Amin, Sub Inspector, Kamragirchar Police Station. The post mortem on the dead body was done by PW-260 Doctor Md Habibuzzaman and the post mortem report was exhibited as exhibit-216 and his signature was exhibited as exhibit-216 (1).

The  findings  of  the  post  mortem  report  are reproduced verbatim:-

(1) Entry wound: On the right side of the chin 1 ″x13 ″x 3

cranial cavity, Exit wound: on the occipital area 4″x3″ laceration & edge is everted. (2) Entry wound on the back of the chest (right side) 13

″x13 ″x chest cavity- exit is on the rt. side of the front of the chest 212 ″x2″ (everted edge).

(3)   Entry wound on the rt. arm back-1 ″x1 ″ inverted &

3 3

Exit on the front of the rt. arm 2″x112 ″-edge everted.

(4)  Entry on the left hand 13 ″x1 ″ inverted (on the palm) 3

&     exit on the dorsum of the left hand size 1″x 2 3

laceration edge is everted.

The opinion of the doctor is reproduced verbatim:-

The death is due to shock resulted from brain injury  caused  rifle  bullet  injuries  which  is  ante- mortem & homicidal in nature.

  1.            The dead body of BA-2324 Colonel Mohammad Moshiur Rahman was identified by the relative of the deceased, Md. Monjurul Alam and the inquest report was prepared by PW-184 Md Shafiqul Islam, Sub Inspector, Lalbag Police Station. The post mortem on the  dead  body  was  done  by  PW-304  Doctor  Md Zubaidur Rahman and the post mortem report was exhibited  as  exhibit-247  and  his  signature  was exhibited as exhibit-247 (1).

The  findings  of  the  post  mortem  report  are reproduced verbatim:-

(1)         One entry wound of bullet found on Right Frontal region of Forehead 1″ right from right eye 1 ″x1 ″ in

2                     2

size  found  inverted  and  blackened.  (II)  One  exit wound of bullet found left parietal temporal region 112

″x1″ found everted (III) One entry wound of bullet

found on back of right side of chest 1 ″x1 in size

2  2

found blackened inverted. (IV) One exit wound of bullet found on upper part of right side of chest 1″ above right nipple 112 ″x1″ in size found everted. (V)

One entry wound of bullet found on back of left chest 1 ″x1 ″ 2″ left from midline blackened and inverted.

2  2

(VI) One Exit wound of bullet found on left side of chest in front 112 ″x1″ in size found everted. (VII) Entry

wound  of  bullet  found  on  right  side  of  back  of abdomen  upper  part  1 ″x 1  in  size  found  inverted

2  2

(VIII)  One  exit  wound  of  bullet  found  on front  of abdomen right side 11″x1 in size found everted on

2  2

detailed dissection –Injury No. (1) Bullet pierces the skin, muscle fractured the right side of frontal bone injured the meninges. Brain goes from right side to left side and right back side, Fractured the left parietal

temporal bone and goes out which is exit wound injury NO. (II). Brain, meninges found injured. Injury No. (III) and (IV), (V) and (VI) and (VII) and (VIII) Bullet injured the viscera and goes out. Right lung, left lung, heart, liver found injured. Chest and abdominal cavity contain liquid and clotted blood. Mentioned injures are ante-mortem as ante-mortem congestion and liquid, clotted blood found on mentioned wound. The opinion of the doctor is reproduced verbatim:-

The death was due to shock (Injury No. 1) as a result of above mentioned bullet injury which was ante-mortem and homicidal in nature.

  1.            The dead body of  BA-2409 Colonel Quadrat Elahi Rahman Shafique was identified by wife of the deceased, Mrs. Lubi Rahman and  PW272 Sayed Anwar Hossain. The inquest report was prepared by PW-165 Md Amran Hossain, Sub Inspector, Lalbag

1

Police Station. The post mortem on the dead body was done by PW-306 Doctor A. KHA. M. Safiuzzaman and the post mortem report were exhibited as exhibit- 273 and his signature was exhibited as exhibit- 273(1). The  findings  of  the  post  mortem  report  are reproduced verbatim:-

(I) Bullet wound-(a) Entry bullet wound found in the middle of the left side of the face measuring 1 "x12 " e

2

lies just below the left maxilla. (b) Exit wound –exit wound found measuring 10ʺx8ʺx brain matter & ē the expaletion of bone & brain matters (c) Directed and Dissected obliquely forwards, upwards & to the right. During its course, it has perforated skin, soft tissue, muscle, facial & intracranial bone, torn of meninges & laceration of brain. (II) Entry (a) Entry bullet wound found in the dorsal aspect of the right dorsum of the hand measuring 1"x1 " e lies 2 inch distal to the right

2  2


1

wrist joint (b) Exit wound are exit wound found in the plum aspect of the right thump, 912 ʺx1ʺ ē lies just

above the 1st carpometem carpal just of the right hand (c) Direction-Directed, forward, upwards & medially, During its course it has perforated skin, soft tissue muscle  &  injury  or  fracture  of  the  right  thump. Mentioned  injuries  are  ante-mortem,  ante-mortem congestion found on the mentioned wound.

The opinion of the doctor is reproduced verbatim:-

The cause of death was due to shock as a result of above  mentioned  bullet  injuries  which  was  ante- mortem & homicidal in nature.

  1.            The dead body of BA-2441 Colonel Md. Akhter Hossain was identified by Brother of the deceased, Md.  Mahmud  Hossain  and  the  inquest  report  was prepared  by  PW-158  Din-E-Alam,  Sub  Inspector, Lalbag Police Station. The post mortem on the dead

 


1

body was done by PW-286 Dr. Mohammad Maksud and the post mortem report was exhibited as exhibit- 236 and his signature was exhibited as exhibit-236 (1). The  findings  of  the  post  mortem  report  are reproduced verbatim:-

I(a) Bullet injuries entry wound is inverted margin on the middle of the chest 13 ″ in diameter circular 1″ from

the mid line lt. laterally & 4″ from the xipisternum process. (b) Exit wound. on the back 1″ Lt to the mid back line & 5 ″ lower to the scapular angle (Lt.). II. Abrasion & laceration present in different area of the body in different size & shape.

The opinion of the doctor is reproduced verbatim:-

The cause of death was due to haemorrhage & shock resulting from above mentioned bullet injury which was ante-mortem & homicidal in nature.

  1.            The dead body of BA-2440 Colonel Md. Rezaul Kabir was identified by brother of the deceased, PW- 284 Dr. Md. Fazlul kabir and the inquest report was prepared  by  PW-180  Md  Kamal  Hossain,  Sub Inspector, Lalbag Police Station. The post mortem on the dead body was done by PW-286 Dr. Mohammad Maksud and the post mortem report was exhibited as exhibit-246 and his signature was exhibited as exhibit- 246(1).

The  findings  of  the  post  mortem  report  are reproduced verbatim:-

I.  Bullet  injury  (a)  Entry  wound  central  portion  of forehead  measuring  1 ″.  Margin  inverted.  Rounded

3

entry point ē abrasion colour present. (b) Exit wound everted margin on the lt. maxillary region measuring 11 ″ in size everted margin (B)(a) Entry wound at the

2

front of Lt arm 3″ below from the shoulder jt inverted

margin ē abrasion colour present (b) exit wound at the back of arm 4″ below the tip of shoulder jt. everted margin, Direction of the bullet is downward forward

&   posteriorly. (II) Abrasion & bruise present in the Lt elbow jt.

The opinion of the doctor is reproduced verbatim:-

The cause of death is due to shock resulted from above mentioned injuries caused by bullet injuries which is ante-mortem & homicidal in nature.

  1.            The dead body of BA-2446 Colonel Md. Nafiz Uddin Ahmed was identified by elder brother of deceased,  PW-267 ASM Rashed and the inquest report was prepared by PW-165 Md Amran Hossain, Sub Inspector, Lalbag Police Station. The post mortem on the dead body was done by PW-304 Doctor Md Zubaidur Rahman and the post mortem report was exhibited  as  exhibit-249  and  his  signature  was exhibited as exhibit-249(1).

The  findings  of  the  post  mortem  report  are reproduced verbatim:-

(I) One Entry wound of bullet found on left side of lower part of neck in front side 1 ″x1 ″ in size found

2 2

inverted and blackened. (II) One exit wound of bullet found on right side of chest on Auxiliary line 8″ right from  midline  1 1  ″x1″  in  size  found  everted  by

2

fracturing the 4th right sided rib.

The opinion of the doctor is reproduced verbatim:-

The cause of death was due to haemorrhage and shock  as  a  result  of  above  mentioned  bullet  injury which was ante-mortem and homicidal in nature.

  1.      The  dead  body  of  BA-2449  Colonel  Quazi Imdadul Haque was identified by brother-in-law of the deceased, PW-272 Sayed Anwar Hossain and the inquest report was prepared by PW-165 Md Amran Hossain,  Sub  Inspector,  Lalbag  Police  Station.  The post mortem on the dead body was done by PW-304 Doctor Md Zubaidur Rahman and the post mortem report was exhibited as exhibit-252 and his signature was exhibited as exhibit-252(1).

The  findings  of  the  post  mortem  report  are reproduced verbatim:-

(I) One Entry wound of bullet found on right side and front of neck 12 ″x1 ″ in size inverted, blackened. (II)

2

One exit wound of bullet found on back of neck and left side 112 ″x11 ″″ in size found everted and lacerated.

2

(III) One entry wound of bullet found on right side of middle  of  abdomen  1  ″x 12   in  size,  inverted  and

2

blackened (IV) On Exit wound of bullet found on back of the body 1″ left of mid line 11 ″x1″ in size found

2

everted. (V) One entry wound of bullet found on right side  of  face  1  ″x 1   in  size  found  blackened  and

2 2

inverted. (VI) One Exit wound of bullet found on left side of occipital right 11 ″x1″ in size.

2

The opinion of the doctor is reproduced verbatim:-

The cause of death was due to shock as a result of above mentioned bullet injury which was ante-mortem and homicidal in nature.

  1.      The  dead  body  of  BA-2526  Colonel  Kazi Moazzem  Hussain  was  identified  by  PW-268  Md Rezaul Hossain and the inquest report was prepared by PW-141 Sheikh Abdul Motaleb, Sub Inspector, Kamragichar Police Station. The post mortem on the dead  body  was  done  by  PW-304  Doctor  Md Zubaidur Rahman and the post mortem report was exhibited  as  exhibit-248  and  his  signature  was exhibited as exhibit-248(1).

The  findings  of  the  post  mortem  report  are reproduced verbatim:-

(1) One entry wound of bullet found on Right side of face  1″  right  from  right  eye  1 ″x 1  in  size  found

2  2

inverted, blackening found. (II) One exit wound of bullet found on left side of head on occipital region 2″ left from midline 112 ″x1″ in size found everted (III)

One entry wound of bullet found on right side of chest 3″ right from midline on 3rd inter costal space 1 ″x1

2 2

in size found inverted. (IV) One exit wound of bullet found on right side of back of the chest 112 ″x1″ in size

found everted. 

The opinion of the doctor is reproduced verbatim:-

The cause death was due to shock as a result of bullet injury which was ante-mortem and homicidal in nature.

  1.      The dead body of BA-3689 Major Md. Khalid Hossain was identified by PW-241 Lt Col Aminul Islam (Retd) and the inquest report was prepared by PW-159  Md  Firoj  Hossain,  Sub  Inspector, Kamragichar Police Station. The post mortem on the dead body was done by PW-306 Doctor A. KHA. M. Safiuzzaman  and  the  post  mortem  report  was exhibited  as  exhibit-270  and  his  signature  was exhibited as exhibit-270(1).

The  findings  of  the  post  mortem  report  are reproduced verbatim:-

(I)  Bullet  injury-(a)  Entry-One  entry  bullet  wound measuring 1 "x1" found in the right side of the upper

2 2

abdomen e 1 inch right from mid line (b) Exit wound- ē  the  corresponding  exit  wound  measuring  11 "x1"

2 found in the left lateral sides of the abdomen e lies 4

inch above from left iliac chest & 9 12  inch right from midline (c) Dissection-Directed obliquely & medially

to right. During its course it has perforated skin, soft tissue, muscle, small intestine & large intestine. (2) Entry wound (a) Entry bullet wound measuring 1 "x1 "

2 2

in the left side of the chest e lies 1 inch lateral to the left  nipple  of  the  breast  (b)  Exit  –One  exit wound found measuring 11 "x1" found in the back of the left

2 2

chest e lies just below the in fro medial border of the scapula  left   (c)  Direction-Directed  backwards, medially  &  to  the  right.  During  its  course  it  has perforated skin, soft tissue, muscle, injury to the left upper rib, heart, left lung. Mentioned injuries are ante- mortem.

The opinion of the doctor is reproduced verbatim:-

The cause of death was due to haemorrhage followed by shock as a result of above mentioned bullet injuries which was ante-mortem & homicidal in nature.

  1.      The dead body of BA-10086 Lieutenant Colonel Lutfar Rahman Khan was identified by wife of the deceased, Doctor Rousonara Begum and  PW-294 Public G.M. Tashid. The inquest report was prepared by  PW-165 Md Amran Hossain, Sub Inspector, Lalbag Police Station. The post mortem on the dead body was done by  PW-304 Doctor Md Zubaidur Rahman and the post mortem report was exhibited as exhibit-257 and his signature was exhibited as exhibit- 257(1).

The findings of the post mortem report are reproduced verbatim:-

(I) One entry wound of bullet found on left side of face 1 "x12 "  found inverted and  blackened.  (II)  One

2

Exit wound of bullet found on left side of occipital region 11 "x1" in size found everted. (III) One Entry

2

wound  of  bullet  found  on  left  upper  arm  Dorsal surface 12 "x1 " in size found inverted, (IV) One Exit

2

wound of bullet found on left upper an ventral surface 112 "x1 " in size found everted. (V) One deface wound

found a left middle, Ring fingers (Amputation), Little fingers (partly amputated), (VI) One Entry wound of bullet found on Right upper part of shoulder 1 "x12 " in

2

size  found  in  verted  and  blackened  (VII)  One  exit wound of bullet found on back of right side11" in size

2

everted.

The opinion of the doctor is reproduced verbatim:-

The cause of death was due to shock as a result of above mentioned bullet Injury which was ante-mortem and homicidal in nature.

  1.      The dead body of BA-2806 Lieutenant Colonel Md. Lutfar Rahman was identified by PW-282 Md Abul  Basher  Talukder and the inquest report was prepared  by  PW-159  Md  Firoj  Hossain,  Sub Inspector,  Kamragichar  Police  Station.  The  post mortem  on  the  dead  body  was  done  by  PW-304 Doctor Md Zubaidur Rahman and the post mortem report was exhibited as exhibit-251 and his signature was exhibited as exhibit-251(1).

The  findings  of  the  post  mortem  report  are reproduced verbatim:-

(I) One Entry wound of bullet found on left side of forehead 1 ″x1 ″ in size found blackened (II) One exit

2 2

wound of bullet found on right side of forehead 11

2

″x1″ in size found everted. (III) Multiple bullet injury found on Different parts of the body of both entry and exit wound found.

The opinion of the doctor is reproduced verbatim:-

The cause of death was due to shock as a result of above mentioned bullet injury which was ante-mortem and homicidal in nature.

  1.      The dead body of  BA-4711 Major Syed Md. Idris Iqbal was identified by wife of the deceased, and  PW-289 Md Abdul Mannan and the inquest report was prepared by  PW-163 Sharee Bishnath Das Gupto, Sub Inspector, Kamragirchar Police Station. The post mortem on the dead body was done by PW-304 Doctor Md Zubaidur Rahman and the post mortem report was exhibited as exhibit-261 and his signature was exhibited as exhibit-261(1).

The  findings  of  the  post  mortem  report  are reproduced verbatim:-

(I) One entry wound of bullet found on left side back of  chest  1  "x 1 "  in  size  under  the  scapula  found

2 2

blackened  inverted.  (II)  One  Exit  wound  of  bullet found on right side of chest 5ʺ right from midline on 3rd intercostal space 11 "x1" in size found everted. (III)

2

One Entry wound of bullet found on right thigh in front side 12 "x1 " in size found inverted, blackened.

2

(IV) One Exit wound of bullet found on back side of right thigh both hands found tied from 11"x1 " in size

2

found everted. (V) One Entry wound of bullet found on left thigh back side in front side 1 "x1 " in size found

2 2

inverted, blackened, (VI) One Exit wound of bullet found on back side of left thigh 11 "x1" in size found

2

everted.

The opinion of the doctor is reproduced verbatim:-

The cause of death was due to haemorrhage and shock  as  a  result  of above  mentioned  bullet  Injury which was ante-mortem and homicidal in nature.

  1.      The  dead  body  of  BA-100310  Colonel  Zakir Hossain was identified by daughter of the deceased, PW-302  Dr.  Sadia  Hossain and the inquest report was  prepared  by  PW-163  Sharee  Bishnath  Das Gupto,  Sub  Inspector,  Kamragichar  Police  Station. The post mortem on the dead body was done by PW- 304  Doctor  Md.  Zubaidur  Rahman  and  the  post mortem report was exhibited as exhibit-266 and his signature was exhibited as exhibit-266(1).

The  findings  of  the  post  mortem  report  are reproduced verbatim:-

(I)    One entry wound of bullet found on left side of chest 1 "x12 " in size found inverted, blackened through

2

the 2nd intercostal space 3" left from mid line. (II) One Exit wound of bullet found on back of the chest 4" left from midline 11 "x1" in size found everted. (III) One

2

Entry wound of bullet found on right shoulder in front 1 "x12 " in size found blackened, inverted. (IV) One exit

2

wound of bullet found on back of the right shoulder 11

2 "x1" in size found everted.

The opinion of the doctor is reproduced verbatim:- The cause of death was due to haemorrhage and shock as a result of above mentioned bullet Injury which was ante-mortem and homicidal in nature.

  1.      The  dead  body  of  Public  Ridoy  Bepary (Vegetable  Seller)  was  identified  by  brother  of  the deceased, Jashim Bapary and the inquest report was prepared  by  Mohammad  Fokhrul  Haque,  Sub Inspector,  Dhanmondi  Police  Station.  The  post mortem  on  the  dead  body  was  done  by  PW-304 Doctor Md. Zubaidur Rahman and the post mortem report was exhibited as exhibit-245 and his signature was exhibited as exhibit-245(1).

The  findings  of  the  post  mortem  report  are reproduced verbatim:-

(1)     One entry wound of bullet found on left partial region behind left ear 1 ″x1 ″ in size found inverted,

2                     2

margin of hair found, (II) One exit wound of bullet found a left temporal region 112 ″x1″ in size. (III) One

entry  wound  of  bullet  found  on  left  leg  back  side upper part 1 ″x1 ″ in size (IV) One exit wound of bullet

2 2

found on left found on left leg front side upper part 11

2 ″x1″ in size.

The opinion of the doctor is reproduced verbatim:-

 


1

The cause of death was due haemorrhage and to shock as a result of above mentioned bullet injury which was ante-mortem and homicidal in nature.

  1.      The dead body of Public Tareq Aziz (Student) was  identified  by  PW-303  Mohammad  Shihab Uddin Ahmed and the inquest report was prepared by Mohammad  Fokhrul  Haque,  Sub  Inspector, Dhanmondi Police Station. The post mortem on the dead  body  was  done  by  PW-304  Doctor  Md. Zubaidur Rahman and the post mortem report was exhibited  as  exhibit-244  and  his  signature  was exhibited as exhibit-244(1).

The  findings  of  the  post  mortem  report  are reproduced verbatim:-

After removing the bandages from head (1) One entry wound of bullet found on right mastoid 112 ″ behind

right ear 1 ″x12 ″ in size found everted, Scapes of hair,

2


1

(II)  One Exit wound of bullet found on back of left ear 1 1 ″x1″ in size (dens) found everted.

2

The opinion of the doctor is reproduced verbatim:- The cause of death was due to shock as a result of above mentioned bullet injury which was ante-mortem and homicidal in nature.

  1.      The dead body of  BA-5108 Major Abu Syed Ghazzali  Dastagir was identified by  PW-275  Md. Shofiullah  and  the  inquest  report  was  prepared  by PW-162  Md.  Abdul  Kader,  Sub  Inspector, Kamragichar Police Station. The post mortem on the dead  body  was  done  by  PW-304  Doctor  Md. Zubaidur Rahman and the post mortem report was exhibited  as  exhibit-264  and  his  signature  was exhibited as exhibit-264(1).

The  findings  of  the  post  mortem  report  are reproduced verbatim:-

 


1

(I) One entry wound of bullet found on right side of abdomen 1 "x1" in size found inverted, blackened 41 "

2 2  2

right from midline 3" below umbilicus. (II) One Exit wound of bullet found on back of the abdomen 11 "x1"

2

of  the  body  3"  right  from  midline  at  12th  thoracic vertebra level. (III) One Entry wound of bullet found on  right  side  of  abdomen  1"  right  from  umbilicus inverted  blackened.  (IV)  One Exit  wound  of bullet found on back of the body (abdomen) 11"x1 " in size

2

found everted.

The opinion of the doctor is reproduced verbatim:-

The cause of death was due to haemorrhage and shock  as  a  result  of above  mentioned  bullet  Injury which was ante-mortem and homicidal in nature.

  1.      The dead body of BA-3453 Major Md. Azharul Islam was identified by wife of the deceased, Mst. Sahina and the inquest report was prepared by PW- 165  Md  Amran  Hossain,  Sub  Inspector,  Lalbag Police Station. The post mortem on the dead body was done  by  PW-304  Doctor  Md.  Zubaidur  Rahman and the post mortem report was exhibited as exhibit- 254 and his signature was exhibited as exhibit-254(1). The  findings  of  the  post  mortem  report  are reproduced verbatim:-

(I) One Entry wound of bullet found on right side of abdomen 1″x1 ″ in size 2″ right from midline 2″ above

2  2

umbilicus found everted and blackened. (II) One exit wound of bullet found on right side of back of the body 11 ″x1″ in size found everted. (III) One entry

2

wound found of bullet found and on back of right side of chest 1 ″x1 ″ in size found inverted, blackned. (IV)

2 2

On exit wound of bullet found on front of chest left

side though 2nd Intercostal space found everted 2″ left from mid line.

The opinion of the doctor is reproduced verbatim:-

The cause of death was due to haemorrhage and shock as a result of above wound by sharp cutting and pointed weapon which was ante-mortem and homicidal in nature.

  1.      The dead body of BA-3396 Major Mahmudul Hasan was identified by Mainul Hasan Tapon and the inquest report was prepared by PW-165 Md Amran Hossain, Sub Inspector, Lalbag Police Station. The post mortem on the dead body was done by PW-304 Doctor Md. Zubaidur Rahman and the post mortem report was exhibited as exhibit-255 and his signature was exhibited as exhibit-255(1).

The findings of the post mortem report are reproduced verbatim:-

(I) One Entry wound of bullet found on left side of forehead 1 ″x12 ″ in size found 1 ″ above from left eye

2 2

found  inverted,  blackened.  (II)  One  exit  wound  of bullet found on left parietal temporal region 11 ″x1″ in

2

size found everted. (III) One stab wound found on the back of right side of the body 11″x1″x cavity depth.

2  2

The opinion of the doctor is reproduced verbatim:-

The cause of death was due to shock as a result of above mentioned bullet injury which was ante-mortem and homicidal in nature.

  1.      The  dead  body  of  BA-2508  Colonel  Shamsul Arefin Ahmed was identified by Mehedi Hossain and the  inquest  report  was  prepared  by  PW-140  Read Mahmud, Sub Inspector, Lalbag Police Station. The post mortem on the dead body was done by PW-286 Dr. Mohammad Maksud and the post mortem report was exhibited as exhibit-248 and his signature was exhibited as exhibit-248(1).

The  findings  of  the  post  mortem  report  are reproduced verbatim:-

I.  Bullet  injuries  (A)(a)  Entry  wound-In  the  rt hypochondrium region of the abdomen measuring 1

3

inverted  margin  rounded  point  ē  abrasion  &  color present. (b) Exit wound-In the back 2″ from the mid back  line  rt.  sided  3″  above  from  post  iliac  chest.

(B)(a) Entry point-In the middle of the rt. thigh 12

measuring inverted margin, (b) Exit wound is the back of  the  rt.  thigh  1″  measuring  everted  margin  II. Abrasion & laceration present in the different size & shape in the different part of the body.

The opinion of the doctor is reproduced verbatim:-

The cause of death was due to haemorrhage & shock resulting from above mentioned bullet injuries which were ante-mortem & homicidal in nature.

  1.      The dead body of  BA-3393  Major  Mustaque Mahmud  was  identified  by  wife  of  the  deceased, Sahapar Khan Samia and  PW-291 Dr. Joy Hazra. The inquest report was prepared by  PW-140  Read Mahmud, Sub Inspector, Lalbag Police Station. The post mortem on the dead body was done by PW-286 Dr. Mohammad Maksud and the post mortem report was exhibited as exhibit-249 and his signature was exhibited as exhibit-249(1).

The  findings  of  the  post  mortem  report  are reproduced verbatim:-

(A)  Bullet  injuries  (I)(a)  Entry  wound-over  the  lt. temporal region 2″ above the ala of Lt ear measuring 1

2

      size  inverted  margin,  circularly,  abrasion   color

present (b) Exit wound over the Lt occipital region 2″ above from occipital protuberance size is 2″, everted margin  through  which  brain  is  expelled  out  partly. II(a) Entry wound Lt chest region 2″ laterally to the Lt nipple & another 212 ″ lt lateral to the Lt nipple (b) Exit

wound on the back of the body 4″ & 5″ Lt lateral from the mid back line everted margin 8″ below the tip of shoulder. III(a) Entry wound Lt hypochondriac region size 12 ″ inverted margin, 1″ below the subcostal angle

&   5″ Lt lateral from the umbilicus (b) Exit wound on the  wrist  in  mid  back  line  1″  above  the  coccy measuring 1″ in size everted margin. (B) Laceration present in the chest & back region.

The opinion of the doctor is reproduced verbatim:-

The cause of death was due to haemorrhage & shock resulting from above mentioned bullet injuries which were ante-mortem & homicidal in nature.

  1.      The dead body of BA-4098 Major Md. Mizanur Rahman was identified by brother of the deceased, BA-5842  Mojor  Md.  Fardous-Ur-Rahman  Khan and  PW-273  Nur  Hossain  the  inquest  report  was prepared by PW-140 Read Mahmud, Sub Inspector, Lalbag Police Station. The post mortem on the dead body was done by PW-286 Dr. Mohammad Maksud and the post mortem report was exhibited as exhibit- 251 and his signature was exhibited as exhibit-251(1). The findings of the post mortem report are reproduced verbatim:-

(I) Bullet injuries (A)(a) Entry wound- in the rt. sided of the neck 13 " in diameter, inverted margin, rounded

entry  point  ē  abrasion  &  colour  present.  (b)  Exit wound in the Lt. occipital region behind the Lt. ear measuring 2ʺx112 ʺ in size. Through this brain matter is  expelled out. During the course of injuries it passes the skin, scalp, temporal bone & occipital bones & brain matter.

The opinion of the doctor is reproduced verbatim:-

The cause of death was due to shock (neurogenic) resulting from above mentioned bullet injury which was ante-mortem & homicidal in nature.

  1.      The dead body of  BA-2624 Major Hossain Sohel Shahnewaz was identified by brother of the deceased, Hossain Shamim Ifthakhar and the inquest report was prepared by  PW-157 Riton Ray Chowdhury, Sub Inspector, Kamragichar Police Station. The post mortem on the dead body was done by PW-304 Doctor Md. Zubaidur Rahman and the post mortem report was exhibited as exhibit-262 and his signature was exhibited as exhibit-262(1).

The  findings  of  the  post  mortem  report  are reproduced verbatim:-

(I) One entry wound of bullet found on front of chest right side 1"x1" in size found inverted, blackened 2ʺ

2  2

right from midline at 3rd intercostal space. (II) One Exit wound of bullet found on back of the chest 112

"x1" in size found everted 3ʺ right from midline at 4th thoracic  vertebra  level.  (III)  One  Entry  wound  of bullet found on front of abdomen left side 2ʺ left from midline and 1ʺ above umbilicus 1 "x1 " in size found

2 2

inverted, blackened. (IV) One Exit wound of bullet found on 11 "x1 " in size everted both hands tied with

2

red ribbon on back of the abdomen 21 " left side at 15

2

lumbar vertebra level. (V) One Entry wound of bullet found on right side of abdomen 1"x1 " in size found

2  2

inverted,  blackened   right  from  midline  and  1"

above the umbilicus, (VI) One Exit wound of bullet found on back abdomen right side 4ʺ from midline at 11th  thoracic  vertebra  level  1 12 "x1"  in  size  found

everted. (VII) One entry wound of bullet found on right thigh in front 1 "x1 " in size found blackened,

2 2

inverted, (VIII) One Exit wound of bullet found on right thigh back side 112 "x1" in size found blackened.

The opinion of the doctor is reproduced verbatim:-

The cause of death was due to haemorrhage and shock  as  a  result  of above  mentioned  bullet  Injury which was ante-mortem and homicidal in nature.

  1.      The dead body of BA-3190 Major Kazi Ashraf Hossain was identified by Professor Doctor Mizanul Hoque, Forensic Medicin and the inquest report was prepared by  PW-157  Riton  Ray  Chowdhury, Sub Inspector,  Kamragichar  Police  Station.  The  post mortem  on  the  dead  body  was  done  by  PW-304 Doctor Md. Zubaidur Rahman and the post mortem report was exhibited as exhibit-268 and his signature was exhibited as exhibit-268(1).

The  findings  of  the  post  mortem  report  are reproduced verbatim:-

(I) One entry wound of bullet found on left side of chest 1 "x1 " in size found blackened and inverted, (II)

2 2

One Exit wound of bullet found on back side of chest 112 "x1" in size found everted. (III) One Entry wound

of bullet found on right side of chest 1 "x1 " in size

2 2

found inverted, blackened. (IV) One exit wound of bullet found on back of the chest 11"x1" in size found

2

inverted. (V) One entry wound of bullet found on left side  of  abdomen  1  "x 1  "  in  size  found  inverted,

2 2

blackened. (VI) One exit wound of bullet found on left

side of back of chest found everted. (VII)One injured wound found on left forearm 2ʺx1ʺ muscle depth.

2

The opinion of the doctor is reproduced verbatim:-

The cause of death was due to haemorrhage and shock  as  a  result  of above  mentioned  bullet  Injury which was ante-mortem and homicidal in nature.

  1.      The dead body of BA-1891 Lieutenant Colonel Enshad  Ibn  Amin  was  identified  by  wife  of  the deceased, Doctor Royena Motin and the inquest report was prepared by PW-165 Md Amran Hossain, Sub Inspector, Lalbag Police Station. The post mortem on the dead body was done by PW-306 Doctor A. KHA.

M.  Safiuzzaman  and  the  post  mortem  report  was exhibited  as  exhibit-269  and  his  signature  was exhibited as exhibit-269(1).

The  findings  of  the  post  mortem  report  are reproduced verbatim:-

 


1

(I)  Bullet  wound-(a)  Entry-One  entry  bullet  wound measuring 1 "x12 " found in the left lateral chest e lies 3

2

inch below from the left maxilla at the level of the 4th intercostal space and 10 inch lies left from mid line (b) Direction-Directed forwards medially & to the right. During  its  course  it  has  perforated  skin  soft  tissue subcutaneous muscle injury to the upper margin of the left fourth rib injury to the left side of the pleura left lung & heart & injury to the left medial aspect of the left  fourth  thoracic  vertebra.  One  deformed  bullet recovered from the body of the left thoracic vertebra

&  given to the constable no 19265 as alamot (2) About 2"x 1 "  One  perforated  wound  found  is  the  lateral

2

aspect of the left upper arm e lies 5 inch below from left  shoulder  joint  ē  the  corresponding  exit  wound measuring 21 "x1" found in the post aspect of the left

2


1

upper arm e lies 2 inch below from left maxilla. Mentioned injury are ante-mortem.

The opinion of the doctor is reproduced verbatim:-

The cause of death was due to haemorrhage followed by shock as a result of above mentioned bullet injuries which was ante-mortem & homicidal in nature.

  1.      The dead body of  RDO-171 DAD Md. Fosi Uddin was identified by  PW-317 Professor Dr. Sharif Aktaruzzaman and the inquest report was prepared by  PW-180 Md Kamal Hossain, Sub Inspector, Lalbag Police Station. The post mortem on the dead body was done by PW-271 Doctor Snigdha Sarker and the post mortem report was exhibited as exhibit-231 and his signature was exhibited as exhibit- 231(1).

 


1

The  findings  of  the  post  mortem  report  are reproduced verbatim:-

(A)(1) Bullet injury (a) Entry wound 1 ″ in diameter on 3

the  head  1″  below  &  behind  the  left  ear  having inverted round margin (b) Exit wound 5″x3″ on the back of the head in the occipital area (c) direction & dissection: Runs forwards to backwards medially & upwards  causing  perforation  &  injury  to  skin,  soft tissue,  scalp,  bones  (temporal,  occipital)  &  brain comes out. (2) Bullet injury (a) entry wound 1″x1 ″ on

2

the lateral aspect of rt wrist joint (b) Exit wound 3″x4″ on the midial aspect of the wrist & dorsum of right palm  (c)  Direction  &  dissection:  From  lateral  to medially causing injury & perforation of the skin, soft tissue, bones (Lower end of rt radius & ulna, carpal bones) & dislocation of rt. wrist joint. (B) Stab wound: Three stab wounds on the rt. chest 4cm, 2cm, 3cm

from  midlines  respectively  in  the  4th,  4th  &  6th intercostal  spaces  respectively  spindle  shaped measuring 11 ″x1″ having clear cut margin & pointed

2

ends causing injury & perforation to skin, soft tissue & laceration of right lungs.

The opinion of the doctor is reproduced verbatim:-

The cause of death was due to shock resulting from the above mentioned (No. 1) bullet injury which was ante-mortem & homicidal in nature.

  1.      The  dead  body  of  BA-118018  Lieutenant Colonel  Quazi  Robee  Rahman  was  identified  by wife of the deceased, Doctor Fouzia Rashid and the inquest  report  was  prepared  PW-180  Md  Kamal Hossain, Sub Inspector, Lalbag Police Station. The post mortem on the dead body was done by PW-286 Doctor Mohammad Maksud and the post mortem report was exhibited as exhibit-247 and his signature was exhibited as exhibit-247(1).

The  findings  of  the  post  mortem  report  are reproduced verbatim:-

I. Bullet injury (A)(a) Entry wound-at the 2″ behind & posterior  to  Lt.  ear  &  1  above  from  Lt  mastoid

2

process  measuring  1   round,  inverted  margin  ē

3

abrasion color present. (b) Exit wound 1″ posterior to rt  ear  &  1  above  in  rt.  mastoid  region,  everted

2

margin,  through  the  opening  portion  of  brain  & meninges comes out (c) Direction & dissection note lt. to rt. downwards forward &medially, during its course skin, scalp, bones & brain matter perforate, liquid & clotted blood found in the skull cavity. (B) (a) Entry wound at the central portion of the back 1″ rt. of mid back  line  12  in  size  &  circular  inverted  margin  ē  abrasion color present. (b) Exit wound rt. sided of the chest size 1″ & 3″ rt. to the rt. nipple everted margin (c)  Direction & Dissection Lt to rt. downwards, forwards & medially, during the course skin, subcutaneous tissue, fat, pleura, lungs pierced & heart pierced liquid & clotted blood present in the chest cavity, (II) Abrasion present in the different places of the chest & back region.

The opinion of the doctor is reproduced verbatim:-

The cause of death was due to & shock haemorrhage resulted from above mentioned bullet injuries which were ante-mortem & homicidal in nature.

  1.      The dead body of BA-4762 Major Md Rafiqul Islam was identified by brother of the deceased, Md. Asifur Rahman and the inquest report was prepared by PW-180 Md Kamal Hossain, Sub Inspector, Lalbag

Police Station. The post mortem on the dead body was done by PW-306 Doctor A. KHA. M. Safiuzzaman and the post mortem report was exhibited as exhibit- 274 and his signature was exhibited as exhibit-274(1). The  findings  of  the  post  mortem  report  are reproduced verbatim:-

(I)  Bullet  wound-(a)  Entry-one  entry  bullet  wound measuring 1 "x1 " found in the right upper chest e lies 34

2 2

inch  right  from  midline  &  lies  in the  line  of  right nipple & at the level of 4th intercostal space (b) Exit wound –one exit wound found measuring 1ʺx1 " in the

2

back of the right chest ē lies 3 inch right from midline at  the  level  of  6th  intercostal  space.  (c)  Direction- Dissected forwards, backwards, medial & to the right. During its course it has perforated skin, soft tissue, muscle, 4th rib heart & left lung (2) Entry wound-one

entry wound measuring 12 "x1 " e lies in the face just

2

above the right mid eye brow (b) Exit wound one exit wound found in the posterior aspect of the skull above the occipital region measuring 1ʺx 1 ʺ (c) Direction-

2

Directed  obliquely,  forward,  &  medially,  During course  it  has  perforated  skin,  soft  tissue  muscle, frontal laceration of frontal & occipital lobe of the brain & occipital bone of the skull. (3) Entry (a) One entry bullet wound found in the right side of the upper neck measuring 1 "x1 " e 112  inch below the right angle

2 2

of the mandible & 11  inch right from midline. (b) exit

2

wound-one exit wound fuond in the back of the Lt upper  neck  e,I.  1"x 12 "  e  lies 12 inch  below  the  Lt

mastoid  process.  (c)  Direction-Directed  forwards, upwards oblique & to the left. During its course it has perforated, skin, soft tissue, muscle & great vessels of the neck, injury or parietal Lt. temporal bone & laceration of the temporal lobe of brain (regal). Liquid

&     clotted blood found in the thoracic cavity. Ante- mortem congestion found on the mentioned wound. Mentioned injuries are ante-mortem.

The opinion of the doctor is reproduced verbatim:-

The cause of death was due to haemorrhage followed by shock as a result of above mentioned bullet injury which was ante-mortem & homicidal in nature.

  1.      The dead body of  BA-2409 Colonel Md. Naqibur Rahman was identified by  PW-212 Maj SM Moniruzzaman and the inquest report was prepared by  PW-180 Md Kamal Hossain, Sub Inspector, Lalbag Police Station. The post mortem on the dead body was done by PW-306 Doctor A. KHA.

M.  Safiuzzaman and the post mortem report were

 


1

exhibited as exhibit-F and his signature was exhibited as exhibit-276(1).

The  findings  of  the  post  mortem  report  are reproduced verbatim:-

(I) Bullet injury- (a) Entry bullet wound measuring 1 2

"x12 " found in the right side of the forehead e lies 3 4

inch  above  the  right  brow.  (b)  exit-Exit  wound measuring 1"x1 " found on the Lt temporal region of

2

the scalp e lies 12 inch above the left mastoid (illegible) (c)  Direction-Directed  obliquely  forwards  &  to  the left.  During  its  course  it  has  perforated  skin,  soft tissue, frontal bone, muscle, frontal lobe of the brow & temporal lobe of the brain, Lt temporal bone & scalp.

(2)    Entry- one entry bullet wound in the right upper

chest measuring 12 "x12 " e lies 1 inch right from right

nipple & 61  inch right from midline & at lies at the 4th

2


1

intercostal space (b) exit-Exit wound measuring in the back of the right chest e lies in the right from midline at the level 6 intercostal space (c) Direction-Dissected forwards, backwards, medially. During course it has perforated skin, soft tissue muscle, heart, left lung, 4th ribs of ant. Aspect & 6th ribs of post aspect. (3) (a) Entry -one entry bullet wound measuring 12 "x1 " found

2

in the left upper chest e lies 4 inch left from midline & lies at the 3rd intercostal space. (b) exit- exit wound found in the back of the left chest e lies 5th inch from midline at the level of 5th intercostal space. During its course it has perforated, skin, soft tissue, muscle, 4th ribs of Lt anterior aspect, left lung & 5th ribs of the back of Lt. Chest & directed forearm & backwards. Ante-mortem  congestion  found  on  the  mentioned wound. Liquid & clotted blood found on the thoracic, cavity. Mentioned injuries are ante-mortem.

 


1

The opinion of the doctor is reproduced verbatim:-

The cause of death was due to haemorrhage followed by shock as a result of above mentioned bullet injury which was ante-mortem & homicidal in nature.

  1.      The dead body of  BSS-100894 Major SAM Mamunur Rahman was identified by Relative of the deceased, SM Masudur Rahman and the inquest report was prepared by PW-180 Md Kamal Hossain, Sub Inspector, Lalbag Police Station. The post mortem on the dead body was done by  PW-304 Doctor Md Zubaidur Rahman and the post mortem report was exhibited as exhibit-256 and his signature was exhibited as exhibit-256(1).

The findings of the post mortem report are reproduced verbatim:-

(I)   One entry wound of bullet found on the right side of face 1 "x1" in size found inverted and blackened.

2 2

(II)    One Exit wound of bullet found on left parietal temporal region 11 "x1" in size found everted. (III)

2

One  Entry  wound  of  bullet  found  on  left  side  of abdomen 2" left and 1" below the umbilicus 1 "x12 " in

2

size found inverted, blackened. (IV) One Exit wound of bullet found on right and back side of the body 112

"x1 " found everted. 

The opinion of the doctor is reproduced verbatim:-

The cause of death was due to shock as a result of above  mentioned  Bullet  Injury  which  was  ante- mortem and homicidal in nature.

  1.      The dead body of  BA-3191 Major Mahmood Hasan was identified by PW-197 Md Iqbal Hossain and the inquest report was prepared by PW-158 Din- E-Alam, Sub Inspector, Lalbag Police Station. The post mortem on the dead body was done by PW-286 Dr. Mohammad Maksud and the post mortem report was exhibited as exhibit-235 and his signature was exhibited as exhibit-235(1).

The  findings  of  the  post  mortem  report  are reproduced verbatim:-

I. Bullet injury (A)(a) Entry wound over the lt mastoid region 11 ″ below the ala of lt. ear. inverted margin

2

abrasion  ē  color  size.  12  present  (b)  Exit  wound- everted margin over the lt. shoulder area measuring

1″x11 ″ in size (B)(a) Entry wound over the Rt. knee

2

jt. measuring 12 ″ inverted margin (b) Exit wound back of the Rt. leg 2″ below the knee jt. measuring 1″x1 in

2

size enverted margin. (C)(a) Entry wound over the lt hypochondrium  region 1  in  size. circular,  (b) Exit

3

wound back of the body 2″ lt laterally from mid back line  & 3″ above from poot occipital protuberance everted margin, II. Abrasion present over the chest area & lacerated area present over the Rt. mid arm measuring 2″x3″ in size.

The opinion of the doctor is reproduced verbatim:-

The cause of death was due to haemorrhage & shock resulting from above mentioned bullet injuries which were ante-mortem & homicidal in nature.

  1.      The dead body of  BA-2790 Major Ahmed Azizul Hakim was identified by PW-317 Professor Dr. Sharif Aktaruzzaman and the inquest report was prepared by  PW-184 Md. Shafiqul Islam, Sub Inspector, Lalbag Police Station. The post mortem on the dead body was done by  PW306 Doctor AKM Shafiuzzaman.

The  findings  of  the  post  mortem  report  are reproduced verbatim:-  

(I)  Bullet  wound-(a)  Entry-One  entry  bullet  wound measuring 1 "x1 " found in the left side of the upper

2 2

neck e lies just below middle of the left side of the mandible. (b) Exit –One exit wound found on the post aspect of the scalp over the occipital bone measuring 2"x11 ". (c) Direction-Directed forwards, upwards &

2

backwards  to  the  right.  During  its  course  it  has perforated skin, soft tissue muscle fractured of Lt side of the mandible injury to the great vessels of the left side of the neck, bone of the brain & occipital lobe of the brain meninges & occipital bone of the skull (2) one entry bullet wound found in the left side of the chest measuring 1"x1 " e lies in the 21  inch left from

2  2 2

midline  &  at  the  3rd intercostal  space  (b)  ē

corresponding exit wound in the left lateral side of the chest measuring 112 "x1  e lies 312  inch below from left

2

maxillary fold & joint left from midline (c) Direction- Dissected  obliquely,  forward,  lateral  &  to  the  left. During its course it has perforated skin, soft tissue, muscle, 4th ribs of left ante-mortem, heart lung (left) & 3rd ribs of the Lt. lateral chest, subcutaneous, muscle, skin.  Mentioned  injuries  are  ante-mortem,  ante- mortem  congestion  found  in the  mentioned  wound. Liquid & clotted blood found on the thoracic cavity which was ante-mortem.

The opinion of the doctor is reproduced verbatim:-

The  cause  of  death  was  due  to  haemorrhage followed  by  shock  as  a  result  of  above  mentioned bullet injuries which was ante-mortem & homicidal in nature.

  1.      The  dead  body  of  BA-2669  Colonel  Md. Emdadul  Islam  was  identified  by  brother  of  the deceased,  Major  Md.  Halal  Islam  and  the  inquest report was prepared by  PW-138 Md Shaha Jahan Khan, Sub Inspector, Lalbag Police Station. The post mortem  on  the  dead  body  was  done  by  PW306 Doctor  AKM  Shafiuzzaman  and  the  post  mortem report was exhibited as exhibit-278 and his signature was exhibited as exhibit-278(1).

The  findings  of  the  post  mortem  report  are reproduced verbatim:-

(I) Bullet wound- (a) Entry - 1 "x12 " bullet wound in the 2

left side of the face just in front of the left ear (b) Exit wound found in the right side of the parietal area of the  scalp  measuring  1"x 12  "  (c)  Direction-Directed

obliquely upwards medially & to the right. During its it has perforated skin, soft tissue, muscle, left temporal zygomatic bone meninges left temporal lobe of the brain. Rt. parietal lobe of the brain meninges & right parietal bone & scalp of right parietal region. (2) Entry

(a) One entry bullet wound in the front of the left upper chest e lies 12 inch above from left nipple & 5

inch left from midline at the level of 3rd intercostal space (b) exit wound in the back of the right lateral chest e lies 3 inch below from right maxilla & 10 inch right  midline  i.s  1"x 1  ".  (C)  Direction-Directed

2

forwards medially & to the right. During its course it has  perforated  skin,  soft  tissue,  muscle,  heart  both lung. 3rd ribs of the left side of chest & 4th ribs of right side of the chest. Liquid & clotted blood found in the thoracic cavity. Ante-mortem congestion found in the mentioned  wound.  Mentioned  injuries  are  ante- mortem.

The opinion of the doctor is reproduced verbatim:-

The  cause  of  death  was  due  to  haemorrhage followed  by  shock  as  a  result  of  above  mentioned bullet injuries which was ante-mortem & homicidal in nature.

  1.      The dead body of BA-2847 Major Mohammed Saleh was identified by brother of the deceased, Md. Nurul Haque and the inquest report was prepared by PW-156  Sharojid  Biswas,  Sub  Inspector,  Lalbag Police Station. The post mortem on the dead body was done by PW-286 Dr. Mohammad Maksud and the post mortem report was exhibited as exhibit-245 and his signature was exhibited as exhibit-245(1).

The findings of the post mortem report are reproduced verbatim:-

I. (a) Entry wound of bullet injury is found at 1″ below the chin margin is inverted rounded 1 ″ in diameter. (b)

2

Exit wound of bullet is found at in the occipital region

1″  from  the  occipital  protuberance  1″  in  diameter everted margin. 2.A. stab injury elliptical shape two pointed end present in the Lt hypochondrium region, measuring  3″x1 1  ″.  3.A.  Stab  over  the  Rt  thumb

2

measuring 1″x1″ in size.

The opinion of the doctor is reproduced verbatim:-

The cause of death was due to haemorrhage & shock resulting from above mentioned bullet injury which was ante-mortem & homicidal in nature.

  1.      The dead body of BA-2369 Lieutenant Colonel Md.  Enayetul  Haque  was  identified  by  Sanik Farhadd and the inquest report was prepared by PW- 162 Md. Abdul Kader, Sub Inspector, Kamragichar Police Station. The post mortem on the dead body was done by PW271 Doctor Snigdha Sarker and the post mortem report was exhibited as exhibit-230 and his signature was exhibited as exhibit-230(1).

The  findings  of  the  post  mortem  report  are reproduced verbatim:-

(A) Bullet injury (1) (a) entrance wound on rt. chest 3″ above  rt.  nipple  &  4″  below  rt.  midclavicular  line measuring 1 in diameter having circular & inverted

2

margin. (b) Exit wound on the back 5ʺ rt. from midline

&    61 from tip of rt. shoulder measuring 1″x1″. (c) 2  2

Direction  &  dissection:  From  front  to  backward, upward  causing  injury  &  perforation  of  skin,  soft tissue & rt. lung. (2)(a) entrance wound 11 rt nipple

2

&   3″ from midline having inverted & circular margin measuring 13 ″ in diameter (b) Exit wound on the back

2″ rt. to midline & 4″ from rt scapula angle measuring 1 1  ″x1″  having  everted  &  irregular  margin  (c)

2

Directions  &  dissection:  From  front  backwards  & medially causing injury & perforation of the rt. lungs. (3)(a) on rt. chest 4″ from midline & 2″ below rt. nipple measuring 1 in diameter having inverted &

3

circular margin (b) on rt back 2″ from midline & 41 2

from  scapular  lower  end  measuring  2″x 1  having 2

everted & Irregular margin (c) Direction & dissection: From front to backward medially, downwards causing perforation of rt. lung (4)(a) entrance on rt. abdomen. 1″ below costal margin & 4″ rt to midline measuring 1 ″ in diameter having inverted & circular margin (b)

2

Exit wound on the rt. back 6″ lateral to midline 2″x1″ at the level of L3 vertebra having everted & irregular margin  (c)  Dissection  &  direction:  From  front  to backward, laterally, downwards causing perforation of  liver,  (5)(a) entrance  2″  rt  from  umbilicus measuring  13  diameter  having  inverted  &  circular,

margin (b ) Exit wound on the back 112 rt. to midline

at the level of L5 (c) direction & dissection : Front to backward,  laterally,  downwards;  (6)(a)  entrance wound 3″ above & rt to symphystic pubis measuring

1

2 ″ in diameter having inverted & circular margin (b)

Exit wound on the back (rt) 5″ Medial to ant. sup. iliac skins and 4″ above coccyx, measuring 1″x1 having

2

everted margin (c) Direction & dissection : Front to backward & laterally causing perforation of urinary bladder, (7) Entrance wound on the back of rt. leg 2″x3″ & exit on the front of the leg measuring 5″x6″ causing # Rt tibia & fibula.

The opinion of the doctor is reproduced verbatim:-

The cause of death was due to haemorrhage and shock  resulting  from  the  above  mentioned  bullet injuries  which  was  ante-mortem  &  homicidal  in nature.

  1.      The dead body of BA-5344 Major Mohammed Mominul Islam Sarker was identified by Relative of the deceased, Sanjana Sonia and PW-282 Md Abul Basher Talukder. The inquest report was prepared by PW-138  Md  Shaha  Jahan  Khan,  Sub  Inspector, Lalbag Police Station. The post mortem on the dead body was done by PW-304 Doctor Md. Zubaidur Rahman and the post mortem report was exhibited as exhibit-250 and his signature was exhibited as exhibit- 250(1).

The  findings  of  the  post  mortem  report  are reproduced verbatim:-

(I)  One  Entry  wound  of  bullet  found  on  occipital region 12 ″x1 ″ in size 1″ left from mid line; (AcvV¨) of

2

hair and blackening found. (II) One exit wound of bullet found on right postal region 11 in size found

2

everted.

The opinion of the doctor is reproduced verbatim:-

The cause of death was due to shock as a result of above mentioned bullet injury which was ante-mortem and homicidal in nature.

  1.      The dead body of  Mrs.  Naznin  Shakil  Shipu was identified by the relative of the deceased, Yesmim Akther  and  PW-285  Sheik  Nahar  Mahmud.  The inquest report was prepared by PW-138 Md Shaha Jahan Khan, Sub Inspector, Lalbag Police Station. The post mortem on the dead body was done by PW- 304  Doctor  Md.  Zubaidur  Rahman  and  the  post mortem report was exhibited as exhibit-258 and his signature was exhibited as exhibit-258(1).

The findings of the post mortem report are reproduced verbatim:-

(I) One entry wound of bullet found on left side of chest on upper part of breast 2ʺ left from midline 1"x1

2  2

"         in  size  through  2nd  inter  costal  space  found blackened  inverted.  (II)  One  Exit  wound  of  bullet found on the back of the chest 3ʺ left from midline

(III) One Entry wound of bullet found on upper part of breast (left), 1" left from midline on 3rd inter costal space  level  1 "x 1  "  in  size  found  inverted  and

2  2

blackened,  (IV)  Corresponding  exit  wound  found everted on back of the chest left side (V) One entry wound of bullet found on lower part of left breast 1

2

"x1 " in size found inverted and blackened on 5th inter

2

costal space 3ʺ left from midline. (VI) Corresponding exit wound found on back of the right side of the body found everted. (VII) One Entry wound of bullet found on middle of chest on sternum 1 "x1 " in size found

2  2

blackened.  (VIII)  One  Exit  wound  of  bullet  1 "x1"

2 found on back of the chest right side of 3rd intercostal

space 3ʺ right from midline. (IX) One entry wound of bullet found on 1ʺ left of previous injury No. (VII)

found 12 "x1 " in size, blackened. (X) One Exit wound

2

of  bullet  found  on  back  of  the  body   left  from midline on 3rd intercostal space 11 "x1" in size found

2

everted  (XI)  One  Entry  wound  of  bullet  found  on lower  part  of  breast  (left),  1  "x 12  "  in  size  found

2

inverted, blackened, on 4th intercostal space 312 " left from midline. (XII) One Exit wound of bullet found

on back of the body left side 3ʺ left from midline on 5th intercostal space found everted.

The opinion of the doctor is reproduced verbatim:-     The cause of death was due to shock as a result of above mentioned bullet Injury which was ante-mortem and homicidal in nature.

  1.      The  dead  body  of  BA-5987  Captain Mohammad Tanvir Haider Noor was identified by wife of the deceased, Tasnuva Maha and PW-293 Md Mujiber Rahman. The inquest report was prepared by PW-138 Md Shaha Jahan Khan, Sub Inspector, Lalbag Police Station. The post mortem on the dead body was done by PW-304 Doctor Md. Zubaidur Rahman and the post mortem report was exhibited as exhibit-265and his signature was exhibited as exhibit- 265(1).

The  findings  of  the  post  mortem  report  are reproduced verbatim:-

(I) One entry wound of bullet found on right temporal region 1 "x12 " in dim found inverted, blackened. (II)

2

One Exit wound of bullet found on occipital region 11

2 "x1" in size found everted.

The opinion of the doctor is reproduced verbatim:-

The cause of death was due to shock as a result of above mentioned bullet Injury which was ante-mortem and homicidal in nature.

  1.      The dead body of BA-2296 Lieutenant Colonel Golam  Kibria  Mohammad  Niamatullah  was identified  by  wife  of  the  deceased  Mst.  Sharmin Kibria and PW-270 Md Monir Hossain. The inquest report was prepared by PW-136 Md Shaha Jalal, Sub Inspector, Lalbag Police Station. The post mortem on the dead body was done by PW-286 Dr. Mohammad Maksud and the post mortem report was exhibited as exhibit-237 and his signature was exhibited as exhibit- 237(1).

The findings of the post mortem report are reproduced verbatim:-

I. Bullet injuries, A(a) Entry wound at the back of the skull 1″ above the occipital protuberance 1 in size &

2

inverted margin abrasion & color present circularly (b) Exit wound on the Lt lower mandible everted margin 1″ in size. II(a) Entry wound- in the upper part of the chest wall 1 in size 1″ rt to the mid line & 3″ from

2

the xipisternum & inverted margin (b) Exit wound on the back 2″ Lt sided from mid back line measuring 2″ in size everted margin.

The opinion of the doctor is reproduced verbatim:-

The cause of death was due to shock (neurogenic) which  was  resulting  from  above  mentioned  bullet injuries  which  were  ante-mortem  &  homicidal  in nature.

  1.      The dead body of JCO-4377 Subedar Assistant Md. Abul Kashem was identified by brother of the deceased, PW-229 Rajob Ali and the inquest report was  prepared  by  PW-167  Md  Jamal  Uddin,  Sub Inspector, Lalbag Police Station. The post mortem on

 


1

the dead body was done by PW271 Doctor Snigdha Sarker and the post mortem report was exhibited as exhibit-223 and his signature was exhibited as exhibit- 223(1).

The  findings  of  the  post  mortem  report  are reproduced verbatim:-

(A) Bullet injury (1) (a) entrance wound on the middle of the chest (on the body of the sternum) at the level of 5th rib, circular & inverted margin 1 in diameter, (b)

3

Exit wound on the left side of the back 21 left from

2

midline & 3″ from Lt scapular angle measuring 2″x11

2

   (c) direction & dissection: From front to backwards, laterally causing laceration of heart and left lung.

(2) (a) entrance wound 4″ rt. from midline & 5″ from umbilicus measuring 1 ″ in diameter (b) Exit wound on

3

the  rt.  side  of  the  back  2″  right  from  5th  lumber

vertebrae measuring 1″x1 ″ (c) direction & dissection:

2

From  front  to  backwards  &  downwards,  medially causing perforation & injury of skin, soft tissue, (3) (a) entrance wound on the rt side of the back 4″ rt. from 1st  lumber  vertebrae  having  inverted  margin  1  in

3

diameter (b) Exit wound on the front of the abdomen just above the umbilicus (c) direction & dissection: From back to forward & Medially causing perforation

&      injury  to  skin,  soft  tissues  and  intestine  (small intestine) (3) (a) entrance wound 112 ″ above left pianna

of  the  ear  &  4″  from  occipital  measuring  1   in

3 diameter having circular & inverted margin (b) Exit

wound  just  lateral  to  rt.  angle  of  the  mandible measuring 3″x12 ″ having everted, irregular margin (c)

direction & dissection: From left to right, downwards, laterally  causing  injury  &  perforation  to  skin,  soft tissues, bone, brain, bones, soft tissue (scalp) & skin causing fracture of Lt temporal, sphenoid and laceration of the brain.

The opinion of the doctor is reproduced verbatim:-

The cause of death was due to shock and haemorrhage resulting from the above mentioned bullet injuries which was ante-mortem and homicidal in nature.

  1.      The dead body of  Rowsuni Fatema Akter Lovely was identified by brother of the deceased, Chowdhury Aminul Islam Shohal and PW-276 Nasir Uddin. The inquest report was prepared by PW-167 Md Jamal Uddin, Sub Inspector, Lalbag Police Station. The post mortem on the dead body was done by  PW271 Doctor Snigdha Sarker and the post mortem report was exhibited as exhibit-225 and his signature was exhibited as exhibit-225(1).

The  findings  of  the  post  mortem  report  are reproduced verbatim:-

(A) Bullet injury (1) (a) entry wound 1 ″ diameter on 3

the  back  of  the  chest in  below  3-4th  ribs  having inverted & circular margin (b) Exit wound: 2″x11 on

2

the front (lt side) 11 ″ above the midclavicle (2) (a)

2

entry  wound:  1   diameter  on  the  back  2″  below

3

occipital & 11 lateral to midline having inverted &

2

circular margin (b) exit wound, 2″x1″ on the front (Lt.) side 1 ″ above & lateral to 1st exit wound (3) (a)

2

Entry  wound  left  chest  2″  above  the  nipple  on  3rd intercostal  space  measuring  1   diameter  (b)  exit

3

wound| On the left side of back 1″x1 in measurement

2

5th intercostal space 2″ from midline having everted & irregular margin (4) (a) entry wound 1 on rt. chest 1″

2

 


1

above  rt  nipple  &  2 1  from  midline,  invented  &

2

circular margin (b) Exit wound on the back 2″ from midline  &  3″  medial  to  lower  end  of  scapula measuring 2″x1 ″ having everted & irregular margin

2

(5)  (a)  entry  wound:  on  the  right  breast  412  from midline measuring 1 in diameter (b) Exit wound: 11

3  2 ″x1 on the back 4″ from midline & just medial to lower end of the scapula having everted margin (6) Entry wound: on the left breast just above the nipple 13

   diameter, bullet found within the heart. (7) (a) Entry 1 ″ on left breast 1″ below the nipple in 6th intercostal

2

space (b) Exit on the back 2″ below the lower end of scapular & 312 ″ from midline measuring 2″x11 ″ (8)

2

(a)   Entry: On the back at the level of L3 vertebra, 2″ lateral toit, 1 ″ in diameter (b) Exit on the left side of

2


1

the abdomen 3″ lateral to umbilicus & 31 ″ above the

2

ast. sup iliac spine measuring 21 ″x11 (9) (a) Entry on

2 2

the abd. 1 ″ below the sub costal margin & 4″ from

2

midline measuring 1 ″ diameter (b) Exit on the back 112

3

″x1ʺ on the back 4″ from midline & just medial to lower end of scapula. (10) (a) Entry 1″x1 on the

2

medial aspect of the Lt wrist 1″ above the wrist joint

(b)  Exit on the lateral aspect of wrist joint 2″ above the Lt wrist joint measuring 21″x11 ″ (11) (a) Entry 1″x1

2  2 2

on the medial side forearm on the cubital fossa (b) Exit on the lateral side of forearm 1″ below elbow joint measuring 11 ″x1″.

2

The opinion of the doctor is reproduced verbatim:-

The cause of death was due to haemorrhage and shock  resulting  from  the  above  mentioned  bullet injury which was ante-mortem & homicidal in nature.

 


1

  1.      The dead body of RDO-161 DAD Masum Khan was identified by brother of the deceased,  PW-269 Md Mohibur Rahman Khan and the inquest report was prepared by PW-138 Md Shaha Jahan Khan. The  post  mortem  on  the  dead  body  was  done  by PW306  Doctor  AKM  Shafiuzzaman  and  the  post mortem report was exhibited as exhibit-275 and his signature was exhibited as exhibit-275(1).

The  findings  of  the  post  mortem  report  are reproduced verbatim:-

(I) Bullet wound-(a) Entry- 12 "x1 " entry bullet wound 2

found on the right upper chest e lies 3 inch right from midline & at 3rd intercostal space (b) exit 1"x1" exit

2

bullet wound found on the back of the right lower chest e lies 31 inch right from midline & at the 5th

2

intercostal  space  (c)  Direction-Directed  forwards,

 


1

backwards, and downwards slightly. During its course it has perforated skin, soft tissue, muscle, pleura & right lung injury to 4th ribs of right intestine chest & 6th rib of the back of the right side of the chest. (2) Entry- entry bullet wound measuring 1 "x12 " found on

2

the right side upper neck e lies 3inch below right side

4

of the mid chin. During its course it has perforated skin, soft tissue muscle, injury or frontal of the right side of the mandible & one deformed bullet recovered from the right side of chin just above the mandible & deformed bullet is given to the constable No. 12993 as alamot. (3) Entry (a) entry bullet wound measuring 1

2

"x1 " found on the dorsal as at aspect of the Lt hand e

2

lies 12  inch above from Lt wrist joint (b) exit- wound found in the palmer aspect of the Lt pal of the palm of

the hand i.e. 1ʺx1 " e lies just attached to Lt wrist joint.

2


1

During its course it has perforated, skin, soft tissue, muscle, lacerated ered of the left radius & left temporal bone. Mentioned injuries are ante-mortem. Ante-mortem congestion found on the mentioned wound. Liquid & clotted blood food is to thoracic cavity.

The opinion of the doctor is reproduced verbatim:-

The cause of death was due to haemorrhage followed by shock as a result of above mentioned bullet injury which was ante-mortem & homicidal in nature.

  1.      The dead body of  BA-2770 Colonel Md. Aftabul Islam was identified by wife of the deceased, Nasima Mosaraf and  PW-276 Nasir Uddin. The inquest report was prepared by PW-166 Md Abdul Woahab, Sub Inspector, Lalbag Police Station. The post mortem on the dead body was done by PW271

 


1

Doctor Snigdha Sarker and the post mortem report was exhibited as exhibit-226 and his signature was exhibited as exhibit-226(1).

The  findings  of  the  post  mortem  report  are reproduced verbatim:-

(A) Bullet injury (1) (a) entry wound: On the back in lumber region at the level of L2 in the midline (b) Exit wound: On the right chest 31 ″ left to right nipple & 21

2 2

      from  midline  measuring  112 ″x1  having  everted, 2

irregular  margin  (c)  Direction  &  dissection:  From backward  to  forward  laterally  &  upwards  causing perforation & injury to skin soft tissue, vertebrae L2- L3, Rt lungs. (2)(a) entry wound on the back 11 ″ right

2

to midline at the level of L2 vertebrae measuring 1 ″ in

2 diameter  having  inverted  circular  margin  (b)  exit

wound on right chest 2″ below the rt nipple & 512 ″ rt

from  midline  measuring  1″x 1  having  everted  &

2

irregular  margin  (c)  Direction  &  dissection  from backward to forward, laterally, upwards causing injury

&  perforation to skin, soft tissue, rt lungs.

The opinion of the doctor is reproduced verbatim:-

The cause of death was due to haemorrhage and shock  resulting  from  the  above  mentioned  bullet injury which was ante-mortem & homicidal in nature.

  1.      The  dead  body  of  Maid  Servant  Kolpana Begum was identified by husband of the deceased, Md. Rezaul Karim and  PW-276 Nasir Uddin. The inquest report was prepared by PW-166 Md Abdul Woahab, Sub Inspector, Lalbag Police Station. The post mortem on the dead body was done by PW271 Doctor Snigdha Sarker and the post mortem report was exhibited as exhibit-227 and his signature was exhibited as exhibit-227(1).

The  findings  of  the  post  mortem  report  are reproduced verbatim:-

(A) Bullet injury (1) (a) entrance wound on the front of rt. chest 3″ above rt. nipple & 31 ″ from midline on

2

3rd intercostal space measuring 1 in diameter having

3

circular and inverted margin (b) Exit wound on the rt. side of the back 21 from midline on 4th intercostal

2

space  measuring  2″x12  having  everted  &  irregular margin  (c)  Direction  &  dissection:  From  front  to

backward laterally & slightly upwards causing injury perforation of skin, soft tissues, rt. lung soft tissue, skin (2)(a) entrance wound 1″ left from Lt. nipple & 5″ from midclavicular line measuring 12 ″ in diameter

having circular & inverted margin (b) Exit wound on the  left  side  of  the  back  3″  left  from  midline. Measuring 2″x1″ having everted & irregular margin

(c)     Direction & dissection: From front to backward medially causing injury & perforation of this skin, soft tissue, Lt lung & heart, soft tissue & skin.

The opinion of the doctor is reproduced verbatim:-

The cause of death was due to haemorrhage and shock resulting from the above mentioned bullet injuries which were ante-mortem & homicidal in nature.

  1.      The dead body of No-51932 Lance Naik Md. Manik was identified by relative of  the deceased, Md. Sawkot Akbor and PW-276 Nasir Uddin. The inquest report was prepared by PW-166 Md Abdul Woahab, Sub Inspector, Lalbag Police Station. The post mortem on the dead body was done by PW271 Doctor Snigdha Sarker and the post mortem report was exhibited as exhibit-228 and his signature was exhibited as exhibit-228(1).

The  findings  of  the  post  mortem  report  are reproduced verbatim:-

(A) Bullet injury (1) (a) Entry wound on the Lt. groin 3 12   below  &  medial  to  Lt  ant  supilliae  spine

measuring 1 in diameter having inverted & circular

2

margin (b) Exit wound on the back of Lt thigh 212

above the cubital fossa measuring 11 ″x12 ″ in diameter

2

having  everted  &  irregular  margin  (c)  Direction  & dissection from above downwards, laterally causing injury & perforation of the skin, soft tissue, muscles, Lt. femoral artery. Profuse haemorrhage within the left thigh found.  

The opinion of the doctor is reproduced verbatim:-

The cause of death was due to haemorrhage & shock  resulting  from  the  above  mentioned  bullet injury which was ante-mortem & homicidal in nature.

 


1

  1.      The  dead  body  of  Lieutenant  Colonel  (Retd) Deloar  Hossen  was  identified  by  relative  of  the deceased,  Md.  Sawkot  Akbor  and  PW-276  Nasir Uddin. The inquest report was prepared by PW-166 Md  Abdul  Woahab,  Sub  Inspector,  Lalbag  Police Station. The post mortem on the dead body was done by  PW271  Doctor  Snigdha  Sarker  and  the  post mortem report was exhibited as exhibit-229 and his signature was exhibited as exhibit-229(1).

The  findings  of  the  post  mortem  report  are reproduced verbatim:-

(A) Bullet injury (1) (a) entrance wound on left chest 2″  for  midline  &  2 1   from  midclavicular  line

2

measuring 1 ″ having inverted & circular margin (b)

3

On the back 5ʺ below the tip of Lt. shoulder & 3″ from midline measuring 11 ″x1 ″ having everted & irregular

2 2


1

margin (c) Direction & dissection front to backward, laterally causing perforation & Lt lung (2)(a) entrance wound 212 ″ from midline & 3″ from midclavicular line

1

measuring 3 ″ having inverted margin (b) exit wound

on the back 4″ from tip of Lt shoulder & 31 from 2

midline measuring 2″x12 ″ having everted & irregular margin  (c)  Directions  &  dissection  from  front

backward, laterally (3)(a) entry wound on the chest 31

2

   Lt from midline on 4th intercostal space measuring 13

   in  diameter,  inverted  &  circular  margin  (b)  Exit wound on the back 6″ from midline & 2″ from lower part of scapula measuring 2″x1″ everted margin (c) Direction & dissection: Front to backward & laterally causing perforation of Lt. lungs (4)(a) entrance wound 4″ from midline 1″ above subcostal margin measuring

 


1

1 ″ in diameter & having inverted, circular margin (b) 3

Exit wound on the back 2″ below sub costal sub costal margin and 41 from midline measuring 2″x1 (c)

2 2

Direction  &  dissection:  From  front  to  backward  & laterally  causing  injury  &  perforation  of  skin,  soft tissue, liver (5) entry wound on Lt ant. auxiliary fold 412 from tip of shoulder measuring 1 in diameter

2

inverted margin (b) Exit wound on rt lat. wall of chest 9″ from midline at the level of 6th intercostal space passes to rt arm on medial side & exit on lateral aspect of arm (c) direction from front to backwards causing injury to skin. left lung, heart, rt. lung, (6)(a) Entry wound on the abdomen 3″ above the umbilicus having inverted & circular margin (b) Exit wound on the back 11 ″ rt. to 5th lumber vertebra (c) direction & dissection

2

:  From front to backward & laterally downwards causing perforation of small intestine.

The opinion of the doctor is reproduced verbatim:-

The cause of death was due to haemorrhage and shock resulting from the above mentioned bullet injuries which was ante-mortem and homicidal in nature.

  1.      The dead body of BA-2480 Major Md. Mokbul Hossain was identified by relative of the deceased, Colonel Md. Zakaria and the inquest report was prepared by  PW-167 Md Jamal Uddin, Sub Inspector, Lalbag Police Station. The post mortem on the dead body was done by  PW-304 Doctor Md. Zubaidur Rahman and the post mortem report was exhibited as exhibit-260 and his signature was exhibited as exhibit-260(1).

The  findings  of  the  post  mortem  report  are reproduced verbatim:-

(I) One entry wound of bullet found on left side of

abdomen 4ʺ above from umbilicus and 2ʺ left from midline 1"x1 " in size found blackened, inverted. (II)

2  2

One Exit wound of bullet found on right side of back of abdomen 112 "x1" in size found everted 2ʺ right from

midline at 2nd lumbar vertebra level.

The opinion of the doctor is reproduced verbatim:- The cause of death was due to haemorrhage and shock as a result of above mentioned bullet Injury which was ante-mortem and homicidal in nature.

  1.      The dead body of BA-5306 Major Muammad Mosharof Hossain was identified by brother of the deceased,  PW-230  Md  Mobarak  Hossain  and  the inquest report was prepared by PW-167 Md Jamal Uddin, Sub Inspector, Lalbag Police Station. The post mortem  on  the  dead  body  was  done  by  PW-304 Doctor Md. Zubaidur Rahman and the post mortem report was exhibited as exhibit-263 and his signature was exhibited as exhibit-263(1).

The  findings  of  the  post  mortem  report  are reproduced verbatim:-

(I) One entry wound of bullet found on left side of fore head on left. Frontal region 12 "x1 " in size found

2

blackened. (II) One Exit wound of bullet found on right side of occipital region 11 "x1" in size found

2

everted.  (III)  One  Entry  wound  of  bullet  found  on back of the chest right side 3ʺ right from midline 1 "x12

2

"     in  size  found  inverted,  blackened.  (IV)  One  Exit wound of bullet found on right side of chest in front 1ʺ above right nipple 11 "x1 " in size everted. (V) One

2

Entry wound of bullet found on back of the bone, 3ʺ

right from mid line 1 "x12 " in size found inverted, (VI)

2

One Exit wound of bullet found on left side of upper abdomen 11 "x1" in size found everted from which

2

stomach comes out 1ʺ left from midline (VII). One entry wound of bullet found on right side of back of abdomen  1 "x 1 "  in  size  found  inverted  blackened.

2  2

(VIII) One Exit wound of bullet found on right side front of abdomen 112 "x1" in size found everted. (IX)

One entry wound of bullet found on right side back of abdomen 12 "x1 " in size found blackened inverted. (X)

2

One exit wound of bullet found on front of abdomen 1ʺ left from midline at umbilical level 11 "x1" in size.

2

The opinion of the doctor is reproduced verbatim:-

The cause of death was due to shock as a result of above  mentioned  Bullet  Injury  which  was  ante- mortem and homicidal in nature.

  1.      The  dead  body  of  JCO-3849  Subeder  Major Md.  Nurul  Haque  was  identified  by  wife  of  the deceased,  Asia  Begum  and  PW-310  Shibli.The inquest report was prepared by PW-167 Md Jamal Uddin, Sub Inspector, Lalbag Police Station. The post mortem  on  the  dead  body  was  done  by  PW-304 Doctor Md. Zubaidur Rahman and the post mortem report was exhibited as exhibit-267 and his signature was exhibited as exhibit-267(1).

The  findings  of  the  post  mortem  report  are reproduced verbatim:-

(I)  One  entry  wound  of  bullet  found  on  front  of forehead 12 "x12 " in size found inverted, blackened. (II)

One  Exit  wound  of  bullet  found  on  left  side  of occipital region 11 "x1" in size found everted. (III)

2

One  Entry  wound  of  bullet  found  on  right  mid

auxiliary line at the right nipple level 1 "x12 " in size

2

found inverted. (IV) One exit wound of bullet found on left side of abdomen in front 1ʺ left from umbilicus 11 "x1" in size found everted. (V) One entry wound of

2

bullet found on back of the abdomen right side 6ʺ right from midline 1 "x12 " in size found inverted. (VI) One

2

exit wound of bullet found on left side of abdomen 11

2 "x1" in size found everted.

The opinion of the doctor is reproduced verbatim:-

The cause of death was due to shock as a result of above mentioned bullet Injury which was ante-mortem and homicidal in nature.

  1.      The  dead  body  of  Amzad  Hossen  (Rickshaw Puller) was identified by wife of the deceased, PW- 231  Rasheda  Begum  and  the  inquest  report  was prepared  by  PW-175  Md  Kamal  Hossen,  Sub

Inspector, Hajaribag Police Station. The post mortem on the dead body was done by PW-304 Doctor Md. Zubaidur Rahman and the post mortem report was exhibited  as  exhibit-246  and  his  signature  was exhibited as exhibit-246(1).

The  findings  of  the  post  mortem  report  are reproduced verbatim:-

(1)   One entry wound of bullet found on 1 ″ left of Mid 2

line of a vault of the skull, 1 ″x1 ″ size found inverted

2                    2

and surgery of hair present.

The opinion of the doctor is reproduced verbatim:-

The cause of death was due to shock as a result of bullet injury which was ante-mortem and homicidal in nature.

  1.      The dead body of No-1442120 Snk Md. Zahirul Islam was identified by PW-250 BJO-15153 SWO Md  Akmol  Hossain  and  the  inquest  report  was prepared  by  PW-155  SI  Md  Afzal  Hossain,  Sub Inspector, Dhaka Cantonment Police Station. The post mortem  on  the  dead  body  was  done  by  PW-304 Doctor Md. Zubaidur Rahman and the post mortem report was exhibited as exhibit-259 and his signature was exhibited as exhibit-259(1).

The  findings  of  the  post  mortem  report  are reproduced verbatim:-

(I) One entry wound of bullet found on left side of left parietal region of head 1 ʺx1 ʺ in size after removal of

3                   3

bandage. (II) One Exit wound of bullet found on 1 " 2

right from midline on occipital region 11 "x1" in size 2

found everted.

The opinion of the doctor is reproduced verbatim:-

The cause of death was due to shock as a result of above mentioned bullet Injury which was ante-mortem and homicidal in nature.

  1.      The dead body of BA-2358 Lieutenant Colonel Elahi  Mozoor  Chowdhury was identified by  PW- 317  Professor  Dr.  Sharif  Aktaruzzaman  and  the inquest  report  was  prepared  by  PW-141  Sheikh Abdul Motaleb, Sub Inspector, Kamragichar Police Station. The post mortem on the dead body was done by PW-306 Doctor A. KHA. M. Safiuzzaman and the post mortem report was exhibited as exhibit-277 and his signature was exhibited as exhibit-277(1).

The  findings  of  the  post  mortem  report  are reproduced verbatim:-

Bullet injury- (a) Entry wound measuring 1 "x1 " found

2 2

in the left lower chest e lies 31  inch left from midline

2

at the level 5th intercostal space. (b) Exit- measuring

112 " found in the left lateral chest e lies 7 inch below

from left auxiliary fold & 912 inch left from midline (c)

Direction-Directed  obliquely  laterally  to  the  left. During its course it has perforated skin, soft tissue, muscle, 5th ribs left lung & heart 8th ribs of the left lateral  chest.  Liquid  &  clotted  blood  found  on  the thoracic cavity. Mentioned injuries are ante-mortem. Ante-mortem congestion found on mentioned wound. The opinion of the doctor is reproduced verbatim:-

The  cause  of  death  was  due  to  haemorrhage followed  by  shock  resulting  from  above  mentioned bullet injury which was ante-mortem & homicidal in nature.

  1.      The dead body of No-60835 Naik Assistant Md. Boshir  Uddin  was  identified  by  brother  of  the deceased,  Md.  Abdul  Mutalab  and  PW-276  Nasir Uddin. The inquest report was prepared by PW-167 Md  Jamal  Uddin,  Sub  Inspector,  Lalbag  Police Station. The post mortem on the dead body was done by  PW271  Doctor  Snigdha  Sarker  and  the  post mortem report was exhibited as exhibit-222 and his signature was exhibited as exhibit-222(1).

The  findings  of  the  post  mortem  report  are reproduced verbatim:-

(A) Bullet injury (1) (a) entrance wound on the back 1″  rt  from  midline  at  the  level  of  L4  vertebra measuring 13 ″ in diameter having circular & inverted

margin (b) Exit wound on the left side of the abd. 512 ″ left from midline measuring 5″x3″ having everted &

irregular  out  line  (c)  Direction  &  dissection:  From back to forward laterally & downwards causing injury

&     perforation skin, soft tissue, vena cara ē exit of intestine outside the abdomen.

(2)      (a)  entrance  wound  on  the  back  1 12  rt.  from

midline at the level of L2 vertebra measuring 1 ″ in

2 diameter  having  circular,  inverted  margin  (b)  Exit

wound 2″ left & below the umbilicus & 6″ below the Xihoid  process  measuring  2″x1″  having  everted  & irregular outline (c) Direction & dissection: From back to  front,  laterally.  Downwards  causing  injury  & perforation of skin, soft tissues and intestine (small intestine).

The opinion of the doctor is reproduced verbatim:-

The cause of death was due to haemorrhage and shock  resulting  from  the  above  mentioned  gunshot injuries  which  was  ante-mortem  and  homicidal  in nature.

  1.      The dead body of M-163 Mali Md. Firoz Miah was identified by the Mother of the deceased, Fatima Akther and PW-276 Nasir Uddin. The inquest report

was  prepared  by  PW-167  Md  Jamal  Uddin,  Sub Inspector, Lalbag Police Station. The post mortem on the dead body was done by PW271 Doctor Snigdha Sarker and the post mortem report was exhibited as exhibit-232 and his signature was exhibited as exhibit- 232(1).

The  findings  of  the  post  mortem  report  are reproduced verbatim:-

(A)(1) Bullet injury (a) entrance wound on the left check 1″ left from Lt angle of mouth, measuring 1 ″ in

3

diameter having circular & inverted margin, (b) Exit wound 21 ″ behind the rt. ear & 3″ from occipital on rt.

2

occipital  area  measuring  3″x11  having  everted  &

2

irregular margin (c) Direction & dissection: Upward, backward & laterally causing perforation & injury to skin, soft tissue, bone, brain, scalp & brain comes out. (2)  Bullet injury (a) entrance wound 2″ at from midline at the level of C4 having circular & inverted margin 3″x2″ (b) Exit wound on rt. axilla measuring 3″x2″ having everted, irregular margin (c) Direction & dissection: From back to forward, laterally & downwards causing perforation & injury to skin, soft tissue, things, soft tissue & skin.

The opinion of the doctor is reproduced verbatim:-

The cause of death was due to haemorrhage and shock resulting from above mentioned bullet injuries which was ante-mortem and homicidal in nature.

  1.      The dead body of BA-2605 Major Md. Abdus Salam Khan was identified by brother of the deceased, Md. Mobarak Hossain and  PW-308 Md Habul. The inquest report was prepared by PW-156 Sharojid Biswas, Sub Inspector, Lalbag Police Station. The post mortem on the dead body was done by PW-286 Dr. Mohammad Maksud and the post mortem report was exhibited as exhibit-245 and his signature was exhibited as exhibit-245(1).

The  findings  of  the  post  mortem  report  are reproduced verbatim:-

I. Bullet injury (A) Entry wound- on the Lt sided of the forehead measuring 1 inverted margin round with

3

abrasion colour present 2″ above the rt. supra-orbital ridge (B) Exit wound on the occipital area of the skull measuring  3″x2″  in  size  everted  margin,  2″  above from occipital protuberance. II. Abrasion & laceration present in the different places of the body.

The opinion of the doctor is reproduced verbatim:-

The cause of death was due to neurogenic shock resulted  from  above  mentioned  bullet  injury  which was ante-mortem & homicidal in nature.

  1.      The  dead  body  of  BA-2527  Colonel  Gulzer Uddin Ahmed was identified by PW-317 Professor Dr. Sharif Aktaruzzaman and the inquest report was prepared  by  PW-169  Md.  Nurul  Amin,  Sub Inspector, Kamragi Police Station. The post mortem on the dead body was done by PW260 Doctor Md. Habibuzzaman  and  the  post  mortem  report  was exhibited  as  exhibit-213  and  his  signature  was exhibited as exhibit-213(1).

The  findings  of  the  post  mortem  report  are reproduced verbatim:-

*      Entry  wound:  On  the  sub  mental  region  13 ″x 1 x 3

cranial cavity.

*  Exit on the occipital region 1 1″x 1 edge is everted.

2                      2

*   On the left arm for arm entry-02= each 1 ″x1 ″ & exit

3                    3

-02=each 11 x1 ″ edge.

4 4

*  On the rt. arm & forearm same as left arm.

6(six) entry on the back of the chest each 1 ″x1 ″x chest

3 3

cavity edge inverted & 6 (six) exit wound on the front of the chest each about 11 ″x1″ to 2 ″x2 ″ edge everted.  

4 3 3

The opinion of the doctor is reproduced verbatim:-

The cause of death is due to shock resulted from above mentioned rifle bullet injuries which is ante- mortem & homicidal in nature.

  1.      The  dead  body  of  BA-6119  Captain  Md. Mazharul Haider was identified by elder brother of the deceased, Mahbubul Haidar and the inquest report was  prepared  by  PW-169  Md.  Nurul  Amin,  Sub Inspector, Kamragi Police Station. The post mortem on the dead body was done by PW260 Doctor Md. Habibuzzaman  and  the  post  mortem  report  was exhibited  as  exhibit-214  and  his  signature  was exhibited as exhibit-214(1).

The  findings  of  the  post  mortem  report  are reproduced verbatim:-

*    Entry wound: On the face at the right side of the nose 1″x1x cranial cavity deep-edge is everted.

3  3

*  Exit wound:- On the left side of the occipital area 3 1 2

″x3″ edge is everted ē extrusion of meninges tissue . The opinion of the doctor is reproduced verbatim:- The cause of death is due to shock resulted from brain injury caused rifle bullet which is ante-mortem

&  homicidal in nature.

  1.      The dead body of BA-2487 Colonel BM Zahid Hossain was identified by relative of the deceased, Anwar Hossain and the inquest report was prepared by PW-169 Md. Nurul Amin, Sub Inspector, Kamragi Police Station. The post mortem on the dead body was done by PW260 Doctor Md. Habibuzzaman and the post mortem report was exhibited as exhibit-215 and his signature was exhibited as exhibit-215(1).

The  findings  of  the  post  mortem  report  are reproduced verbatim:-

(1)    Entry wound on the front of the right side of the chest 1 ″x1 ″x chest cavity deep. Exit wound on the

3 3

back of the right side of the chest 1 1 ″x1 1 ″ edge is

2                             2

everted.

(2)   Entry wound on the front of the rt. shoulder 1 ″x1

3                    3

&   through- Exit wound on the back of the rt. shoulder (edge is inverted) x through (3″x2″x edge everted.

(3)    Entry wound on the lateral (Radial) aspect of the rt. wrist 13 ″x1 ″x through & through-Exit wound on the

3

rt. wrist 2″x1 1″-edge is everted. 

2

The opinion of the doctor is reproduced verbatim:-

The  cause  of  death  is  due  to  haemorrhage  & shock  resulted  from  above  mentioned  rifle  bullet injuries which is ante-mortem & homicidal in nature.

  1.      The dead body of BA-1969 Lieutenant Colonel Shamsul  Azam  was  identified  by  Warrant  officer Shamsul Haque and the inquest report was prepared by  PW-142  Md  Mokbul  Hossen,  Sub  Inspector, Lalbag Police Station. The post mortem on the dead body was done by PW-286 Dr. Mohammad Maksud and the post mortem report was exhibited as exhibit- 239 and his signature was exhibited as exhibit-239(1). The  findings  of  the  post  mortem  report  are reproduced verbatim:-

(A) Bullet injury I(a) Entry wound-over the rt. eye 1 2

above  rt.  orbit  inverted  margin,  abrasion  &  colour present measuring 13 ″ (b) Exit wound- over the central

portion of the skull 3 ″ apart from the rt. supra-orbital

ridge on the frontal area everted margin size 2″x1″. II

(a)     Entry wound over the Lt. palm inverted margin size is 12 ″ (b) Exit wound back of the Lt palm through

&                through  opening.  Through  which  skin, subcutaneous tissue, metacarpal bone pierced.

The opinion of the doctor is reproduced verbatim:-

The cause of death was due to haemorrhage & shock resulting from above mentioned bullet injuries which were ante-mortem & homicidal in nature.

  1.      The dead body of BA-2516 Lieutenant Colonel Md. Saiful Islam was identified by cousin brother of the deceased, PW-213 Md Aiyub Ali and the inquest report was prepared by PW-142 Md Mokbul Hossen, Sub Inspector, Lalbag Police Station. The post mortem on  the  dead  body  was  done  by  PW-286  Dr. Mohammad Maksud and and the post mortem report was exhibited as exhibit-240 and his signature was exhibited as exhibit-240(1).

The  findings  of  the  post  mortem  report  are reproduced verbatim:-

(A)  Bullet  injury  I(a)  Entry  wound-over  the  Lt temporal region 2″ Lt lateral to the ala of Lt. ear. inverted margin size 1 ″ ē abrasion & colour present

3

(b)   Exit wound over in occipital region 1″ downwards of  occipital  protuberance  size  2″  in  size  everted margin II(a) Entry wound over the Rt chest cage 2″ Lt from the Lt nipple size 1 (b) exit wound in the back

3

2″ Lt lateral to the mid back line size 3 ″ III(a) Entry

4

wound Lt hypochondrium region measuring 1 ″ in size

2

inverted  margin  (b)  Exit  wound  on  the  back of  Lt thigh 2″ in size everted margin (IV) (a) entry wound over the front of the Lt thigh measuring 1 ″ (VI) Exit

2

wound back of the lower Lt thigh measuring 12 ″ in size everted margin.

The opinion of the doctor is reproduced verbatim:-

The cause of death was due to haemorrhage & shock resulting from above mentioned bullet injuries which were ante-mortem & homicidal in nature.

  1.      The dead body of BA-2353 Lieutenant Colonel Md. Badrul Huda was identified by brother of the deceased,  Tasrirul  Huda,  PW-279  Md  Hafizur Rahman  and  PW-142  Md  Mokbul  Hossen,  Sub Inspector, Lalbag Police Station. The post mortem on the dead body was done by PW-286 Dr. Mohammad Maksud and the post mortem report was exhibited as exhibit-141 and his signature was exhibited as exhibit- 141(1).

The  findings  of  the  post  mortem  report  are reproduced verbatim:-

(I) Bullet injury (A) Entry wound-over the occipital region 1″ from the occipital region above measuring 112 ″x1″ rounded, inverted margin, through which brain

is expelled out. (B) Exit wound over the rt. temporal region measuring 2″x1″ in diameter, everted region of margin. II(A) Entry wound over the rt. chest 1″ below the rt nipple measuring 1 ″ inverted margin, abrasion &

3

colour present (B) Back of the body everted margin 2″in size 6″ from the rt. shoulder jt. everted margin exit wound. III(a) Entry wound on the Lt leg in groin region measuring 1 ″ inverted margin abrasion & color

2

present. (b) Exit wound back of the mid portion of the thigh everted margin, measuring 2″ in size.

The opinion of the doctor is reproduced verbatim:-

The cause of death was due to haemorrhage & shock resulting from above mentioned bullet injuries which were ante-mortem & homicidal in nature.

  1.      The dead body of BA-3716 Major Mahbubur Rahman  was identified by brother of the deceased, PW-211  Md  Mahfuzur  Rahman  and  the  inquest report was prepared by PW-142 Md Mokbul Hossen, Sub Inspector, Lalbag Police Station. The post mortem on  the  dead  body  was  done  by  PW-286  Dr. Mohammad Maksud and the post mortem report was exhibited  as  exhibit-242  and  his  signature  was exhibited as exhibit-242(1).

The  findings  of  the  post  mortem  report  are reproduced verbatim:-

(I) Bullet injury (A)(a) Entry wound-1″ Lt sided below the Lt nipple measuring 1 inverted margin, abrasion

3

&   colour present. (b) Exit wound Lt back of the body

112 ″x1″ in size everted margin 11 ″ from the mid back

2

line (B)(a) Entry wound In the Lt hypochondrium 1

3 inverted margin (b) Lt back exit wound 12 ″ in size 3″

Lt  from  mid  back  line.  (C)(a)  Entry  wound  Rt abdomen  13  diameter  margin  inverted  abrasion  &

colour present (b) Exit wound in the back 3″ below Lt shoulder jt. everted margin (II) Lacerated injury over the  calf  muscle  of  the  Lt  leg  &  abrasion  over  the different parts of the body.

The opinion of the doctor is reproduced verbatim:-

The cause of death was due to haemorrhage & shock resulting from above mentioned bullet injuries which were ante-mortem & homicidal in nature.

  1.      The dead body of BA-4233 Major Mohammad Maksum-Ul-Hakim was identified by elder brother of the deceased,  PW-236 Md Khairul Anam  and the inquest report was prepared by PW-142 Md Mokbul Hossen,  Sub  Inspector,  Lalbag  Police  Station.  The post mortem on the dead body was done by PW-286 Dr. Mohammad Maksud and the post mortem report was exhibited as exhibit-243 and his signature was exhibited as exhibit-243(1).

The  findings  of  the  post  mortem  report  are reproduced verbatim:-

Bullet  injuries  I(a)  Entry  wound-  Rt  sided  of  the hypochondric region measuring1 inverted margin (b)

2

exit  wound  measuring  2″  everted  margin  in the  Lt hypochondriac region II(a) on the Rt sided of the chest entry  wound 1  diameter,  inverted  margin  (b)  exit

2

wound is on the back 2″ from the mid back line. III(a) front of the Lt leg entry wound 1 ″ inverted margin (b)

2

back of the leg 1″ diameter everted margin IV(a) entry

wound Rt mid arm region 4″ from the tip of shoulder 1

2

  diameter inverted margin (b) exit wound –Back of Rt mid  arm  everted  margin  1″  in  size,  shaft  of  rt. humorous fractured (V)(a) entry wound on the knee jt of Lt leg 1″ from knee jt 1 diameter (b) exit wound is

2

back of left lower thigh everted margin.

The opinion of the doctor is reproduced verbatim:-

The cause of death was haemorrhage & shock resulting from above mentioned bullet injuries which were ante-mortem & homicidal in nature.

  1.      The  dead  body  of  BA-2601  Colonel  Md. Shawkat  Imam  was  identified  by  relative  of  the deceased,  PW-253 Md Elias Shah and the inquest report was prepared by PW-142 Md Mokbul Hossen, Sub Inspector, Lalbag Police Station. The post mortem on  the  dead  body  was  done  by  PW-286  Dr. Mohammad Maksud and the post mortem report was exhibited  as  exhibit-238  and  his  signature  was exhibited as exhibit-238(1).

The  findings  of  the  post  mortem  report  are reproduced verbatim:-

I. Bullet injuries, A(a) Entry wound on the chest rt. sided  2″  from  the  rt  nipple,  on  the  rt.  sided  3″  & another is 4″ from the rt sided of the chest margin is inverted circular abrasion & color present measuring

1

size is 3 ″ & rounded 3 in no (b) Exit wound 3 in no.

on the back of the body margin is everted on the back 3″,4″ & 5″ from the rt. mid back line.

The opinion of the doctor is reproduced verbatim:

The cause of death was due to haemorrhage & shock resulting from above mentioned bullet injuries which was ante-mortem & homicidal in nature.

  1.      The dead body of BA-2452 Lieutenant Colonel Abu Musa Md. Ayub Kaiser was identified by elder brother of the deceased, Md. Anamul Haque and the inquest report was prepared by PW-169 Md. Nurul Amin,  Sub  Inspector,  Kamragi  Police  Station.  The post mortem on the dead body was done by PW-260 Doctor  Md.  Habibuzzaman  and  the  post  mortem report was exhibited as exhibit-217 and his signature was exhibited as exhibit-217(1).

The  findings  of  the  post  mortem  report  are reproduced verbatim:-

*    Entry wound: On the back of the right side of the upper part of the chest 12 ″x1 ″x chest cavity & neck.

2

*      Exit  wound  on  the  front  of  the  neck  below  the thyroid  cartilage  size  1 1 ″x1 1  lacerated  &  edge  is

2  4

everted.

The opinion of the doctor is reproduced verbatim:-

The  cause  of  death  is  due  to  haemorrhage  & shock  resulting  from  above  mentioned  rifle  bullet injury which is ante-mortem & homicidal in nature.

  1.      The  dead  body  of  BA-3550  Major  Md. Humayun Kabir Sarker was identified by sister of the deceased, Shakila Akter and the inquest report was prepared  by  PW-168  Md  Delowar  Hossain,  Sub Inspector, Lalbag Police Station. The post mortem on the dead body was done by PW271 Doctor Snigdha Sarker and the post mortem report was exhibited as exhibit-224 and his signature was exhibited as exhibit- 224(1).

The  findings  of  the  post  mortem  report  are reproduced verbatim:-

(A) Bullet injury (1) (a) Entry wound 1 ″ diameter on 3

the back of the chest, 112 ″ left from midline at the level

of T2 vertebra (b) Exit wound on the front 1 ″ above

2

the  jugular  notch  measuring  11 ″x1″.  (2)  (a)  Entry

2

wound 1 ″ in diameter on the back of the left chest 1″

2

left from midline at the level of T4 vertebra (b) Exit wound 11 ″x1 ″ on the front of the chest 4″ lateral to

2 2

midline & at the level of 5th & 6th ribs (3) (a) entry wound on the back 2″ Lt from midline & 3″ from Lower and of scapula measuring 13 in diameter (b)

Exit  wound  on  the  front  of  rt.  chest  1  lateral  to

2

midline between 5th & 6th rib measuring 2″x11 ″ (4) (a)

2

entry wound 1″ below behind the left ear measuring 1 3

in diameter (b) Exit wound on the rt side of the head 1

2

      above  the  pianna  of  rt  ear  measuring  2″x1″  (B) Multiple gunshot injuries of various size are found in different part of the body, two pallets like substance found on the front of right chest at the level of 3rd & 4th rib and 5th & 6th ribs.

The opinion of the doctor is reproduced verbatim:-

The cause of death was due to shock resulting from the above mentioned firearm injuries which was ante-mortem & homicidal in nature.

  1. The dead body of No-66524 Sepoy Ruhul Amin

@     Bulbul was identified by father of the deceased, Bazlur Rahman and  PW-276 Nasir Uddin. The inquest report was prepared by PW-168 Md Delowar Hossain, Sub Inspector, Lalbag Police Station. The post mortem on the dead body was done by PW271 Doctor Snigdha Sarker and the post mortem report was exhibited as exhibit-219 and his signature was exhibited as exhibit-219(1).

The findings of the post mortem report are reproduced verbatim:-

(A) (1) Bullet injury (a) entrance wound 1″ below the rt. angle of mandible & 31 below the rt. mastoid

2

process. Margin is inverted & circular measuring 1 in 3

diameter.  (b)  Exit  wound  2″  below  the  Lt  mastoid process  and  11  behind  the  Lt  angle  of  mandible

2

measuring  2 1 ″x1″  margin  is  everted,  irregular  (c)

2

Direction & dissection: From right to left upwards, backwards  and  laterally  during  its  course  it  has perforated and injured skin, soft tissues, muscles, rt. carotid vessels trachea, Lt carotid vessels, soft tissues and skin.

(2) Bullet injury (a) entrance wound on the rt. side of the back 5″ lateral from midline & 2″ from scapular angle measuring 1 ″. Circular inverted margin. (b) exit

2

wound on the rt. chest measuring 11 ″x1″, situated 21

2 2 from midline & 512 ″ from rt. midclavicular line having

everted & irregular Margin (c) Direction & dissection; From back foreland, medially causing perforation of rt. lungs ē soft tissues & skin (B) Abrasion on forehead and rt. check which is ante-mortem in nature. The opinion of the doctor is reproduced verbatim:-

The cause of death was due to haemorrhage and shock resulting from above mentioned bullet injuries which was ante-mortem and homicidal in nature.

  1.      The dead body of  RDO-87 AD Khandaker Abdul Awal was identified by son of the deceased, Major Monir Hossain and PW 276 Nasir Uddin. The inquest report was prepared by PW-168 Md Delowar Hossain, Sub Inspector, Lalbag Police Station. The post mortem on the dead body was done by PW271 Doctor Snigdha Sarker and the post mortem report was exhibited as exhibit-220 and his signature was exhibited as exhibit-220(1).

The  findings  of  the  post  mortem  report  are reproduced verbatim:-

(A) A stab injury spindle shaped on the left side of the chest  5″  left  from  midline  &  5 1  below  the  left

2

midclavicular line measuring 2″x3 ″ in size margin is

4

clean  cut  &  everted,  two  ends  of  the  wound  are pointed,  directing  from  front  to  backwards, downwards & laterally in the 5th intercostal during its course  it  has  perforated  skin,  soft  tissues  and  Ltd. lung, Liquid & clotted blood found in the chest cavity. The opinion of the doctor is reproduced verbatim:-

The cause of death was due to haemorrhage and shock  resulting  from  above  mentioned  stab  injury caused by sharp cutting pointed weapon which was ante-mortem and homicidal in nature.

  1.      The  dead  body  of  BA-2711  Major  Quazi Mosaddek Hossain was identified by elder brother of the deceased, PW-196 Kazi Md. Moniruzzaman and  the inquest report was prepared by PW-158 Din-E- Alam, Sub Inspector, Lalbag Police Station. The post mortem on the dead body was done by PW-286 Dr. Mohammad Maksud and the post mortem report was exhibited  as  exhibit-234  and  his  signature  was exhibited as exhibit-234(1).

The  findings  of  the  post  mortem  report  are reproduced verbatim:-

I. Bullet injuries (A)(a) Entry wound at Lt sided of the chest  measuring  1   in  size  inverted  margin  with

2

abrasion & color present (b) Exit wound on the back of  the  body  3″  rt  from  the  mid  back  line  everted margin. (b)(a) Entry wound on the front of the thigh measuring 1 ″ inverted margin (b) On the back of the

2

thigh  measuring  34 ″x1″  everted  region  (C)(a)  Entry

wound-on the lt hypochondrium region measuring 1 3

inverted margin (b) exit wound-on the back 5″ lt from the mid back line & 3″ from post iliac creast abovely.

The opinion of the doctor is reproduced verbatim:- The cause of death was due to haemorrhage & shock resulting from above mentioned bullet injuries which was ante-mortem & homicidal in nature.

  1.      The dead body of  BA-3445  Major  Humayun Haider  was  identified  by  brother  of  the  deceased, PW-198  Hamim  Daneyel  Haider  and  the  inquest report  was  prepared  by  PW-158  Din-E-Alam,  Sub Inspector, Lalbag Police Station. The post mortem on the dead body was done by PW-286 Dr. Mohammad Maksud and the post mortem report was exhibited as exhibit-233 and his signature was exhibited as exhibit- 233(1).

The  findings  of  the  post  mortem  report  are reproduced verbatim:-

  1. Bullet injury (a) Entry wound on the rt eye brow measuring 1  inverted  margin,  rounded  entry  point

3

abrasion color present (b) Exit wound- on the rt. sided of  the  throat  measuring  2″x1″  everted  margin  just below the chin.

  1. Abrasion present in the different size of the body one lacerated wound over the chest measuring 4″x3″ in size.

The opinion of the doctor is reproduced verbatim:-

The cause of death was due to haemorrhage & shock resulted from above mentioned bullet injuries which was ante-mortem & homicidal in nature.

  1.      The dead body of BA-3292 Lieutenant Colonel Mohammad  Sazzadur  Rahman  was  identified  by wife  of  the  deceased,  Sarmin  Nishat  and  PW-274 Mehedi Hasan. The inquest report was prepared by PW-140  Read  Mahmud,  Sub  Inspector,  Lalbag Police Station. The post mortem on the dead body was done by PW-286 Dr. Mohammad Maksud and the post mortem report was exhibited as exhibit-250 and his signature was exhibited as exhibit-250(1).

The  findings  of  the  post  mortem  report  are reproduced verbatim:-

(A) Bullet injury (I)(a) Entry wound-over the occipital area of the skull, inverted margin ē abrasion & colur present 12 ″ size (b) Exit wound over the occipital area

of the skull 2″ above the entry wound everted margin measuring 2″ in size through which brain expelled out. (2)(a) Entry wound on the back 2″ Lt lateral to the mid back line inverted margin (b) Exit wound through the umbilical region measuring 1″ everted margin (3)(a) On the waist 1″ above the post occipital protuberance

&  1″ from mid back line (lt laterally) measuring 6″x1″ in size (b) Exit wound Lt upper thigh inverted margin 8″x2″ in size (4)(a) Entry wound over the back of rt. thigh 12 ″ (b) Exit wound over the front of rt. thigh 1″

size  everted  margin  5(a)  Entry  wound  over  the  rt. buttock 3 in no measuring 1 inverted margin (b) Exit

3

wound upper part of the rt thigh measuring about 2″ in size everted region B(a) Abrasion & laceration present over  the  Lt  elbow  jt  &  different  size  &  shape  in different parts of the body.

The opinion of the doctor is reproduced verbatim:-

The cause of death was due to haemorrhage & shock resulting from above mentioned bullet injuries which were ante-mortem & homicidal in nature.

  1.      The  dead  body  of  BA-5558  Major  Mostafa Asaduzzaman was identified by the brother-in-law of deceased,  PW-218  Abdullah  Al  Morshed  and  the inquest report was prepared by PW 165 Md. Amran Hossain, Sub Inspector, Lalbag Police Station. The post mortem on the dead body was done by PW-304 Doctor Md. Zubaidur Rahman and the post mortem report was exhibited as exhibit-253 and his signature was exhibited as exhibit-253(1).

The  findings  of  the  post  mortem  report  are reproduced verbatim:-

(I) One Entry wound of bullet found on left Forearm 1 2

″x1 in size blackened and inverted on ventral side (II)

2

One exit wound of bullet found on left forearm 11 ″x1″

2

in  size  on  Dorsal  side  found  everted.  (III)  One punctured wound found on right side of upper chart in front  2″x1″x  Thoracic  cavity depth  near  right shoulder.

The opinion of the doctor is reproduced verbatim:-

The cause of death was due to haemorrhage and shock as a result of stab wound by sharp cutting and pointed weapon which was ante-mortem and homicidal in nature.

Steps/Solutions taken by the Hon’ble Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina to resolve the crisis.

However, the Hon’ble Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina after hearing the shocking incidents came to the office, discussed the matter with responsible persons and authorities. Many persons suggested solutions in many ways. In order to find out a solution to the crisis, on 25.02.2009 at about 1.30-2.00 pm, the Hon’ble Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina with her own wit, wisdom and farsightedness sent Mr. Jahangir Kabir Nanak, MP and Whip Mr. Mirza Azam MP of the National Parliament of Bangladesh to Pilkhana for making communication with the BDR members in order to settle the crisis in a peaceful manner through discussion. Getting order from the Hon’ble Prime Minister, Mr. Jahangir Kabir Nanak, MP and Whip Mr. Mirza Azam, MP went to the Pilkhana, tactfully met the BDR members, conveyed the instructions of the Hon’ble Prime Minister, held a long discussion and negotiation with the BDR rebels and at one stage, they persuaded the BDR rebels to lay down the arms and they showed interest to resolve the crisis through discussion with the Hon'ble Prime Minister, Sheikh Hasina. As a result, a 14 members delegation under the leadership of DAD Touhidul Alam met the Hon’ble Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina at Jamuna, an official residence of the Hon’ble Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina on the same day at 4:00 p.m, but in order to implement their demands and evil designs, the BDR rebels concealed the killings and massacres they

surrender in the morning. On 26.02.2009 at 8:00 a.m Mr. Jahangir Kobir Nanok, MP and others assembled at Ambala restaurant and asked the BDR rebels to surrender their arms but the BDR rebels took dillydallying approach in surrendering the arms. Being anxious and depressed and finding no other ways, Mr. Jahangir Kobir Nanok, MP and Whip Mr. Mirza Azam, MP talked with the Hon’ble Prime Minister about the latest situation over cell phone at 1:30 p.m. Eventually, at 2:00 p.m, the Hon’ble Prime Minister delivered a speech for the Nation and ordered the BDR rebels to surrender in no time. Following the speech of the Hon’ble Prime Minister, the BDR rebels wanted to surrender their arms. Thereafter, Mr. Jahangir Kabir Nanok MP, Whip Mr. Mirza Azam, MP, Hon’ble Home Minister, Finance Minister, Whip Amili MP, Rashed Khan Menon MP, Hasanul Haque

MP, Chumki MP and Sanjida MP entered the Pilkhana premises. Then the BDR rebels surrendered their arms to the Hon’ble Home Minister. Apart from these, Mr. Jahangir Kabir Nanok MP, Whip Mr. Mirza Azam, MP, Home Minister and State Minister for Law, Justice and Parliamentary Affairs embarking on a pickup made a miking in all places of the BDR Headquarters at Pilkhana, and visited different places and recovered the army officers and their family members from the Operation Theatre (OT) of BDR hospital and other places. Following the decision of the Hon’ble Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina, the aforesaid Ministers and MPs and others went inside the Pilkhana taking a huge risk for their lives and displayed extreme courage by going to the BDR Headquarters during the armed revolt on 25 and 26 February, 2009. The aforesaid facts have been supported and corroborated by the evidence of  PW 321 Whip Mr. Mirza Azam MP, Building No.4, Flat No.902, NAM Bhaban, Manik Miah Avenue, Sangsad Bhaban Area, Tejgaon, Dhaka who has stated in his evidence that at the relevant time of the occurrence he was the member of parliament as well as Whip of the National Assembly. On 25.02.2009 in the morning Advocate Janagnir Kabir Nanok, the State Minister for Local Government as well as Chairman of Awami Jubo League informed him over cell phone that firings were being happened at BDR Headquarters, Pilkhana. He also told him that he was going to the residence of the Hon'ble Prime Minister and told him to come to Jamuna later. Subsequently, he went to Jamuna and came to see Mr. Nanok, Senior Ministers and the senior leaders of Awami League therein. Mr. Jahangir Kabir Nanok was there from before. The senior

In this regard, PW 328, Mr. Jahangir Kabir Nanok, State Minister for Local Government, Rural Development and Co-operative Ministry has stated in his evidence that on 25.02.2009 at around 10:00 a.m, he started for his Ministry. When he reached near fishery building (Matshaw Bhaban) he came to know over phone that firings were being opened at the Pilkhana. He received information from 2/1 more sources. Instantly he informed this matter to Whip Mr. Mirza Azam, Member of Parliament and requested him to come at Jamuna. Thereafter, he went to the residence of Hon'ble Prime Minister at Jamuna. Entering into Jamuna, he found a panic situation therein. Hon'ble Prime Minister discussed the matter with the cabinet minister and the National senior leaders. At 1:00 p.m, Hon'ble Prime Minister told this witness and Whip Mr. Mirza Azam to go to the Pilkhana in order to resolve the problem by discussing with the BDR members. He started thinking over the matter. Thereafter, they started for Pilkhana via City College. When they reached Ambala Sweets they came to hear intermittent sounds of firings. He along with DG RAB, DGFI and higher officials of the police was present there. Taking hand mikes from the police he and Mr. Mirza Azam announced the instructions of

With regard to the steps taken by the Hon’ble Prime Minister, PW634 Advocate Sahara Khatun, Hon'ble Minister for Post and Telecommunication Ministry of Government of Bangladesh  has stated in his evidence that at the time of occurrence she was the Home Minister. The alleged occurrence took place on 25.02.2009. In the morning of that day at around 9:30 a.m, she was informed of the firings at the BDR Headquarters from a nearby place of BDR Headquarters at Zigatala. Having received the information she decided to go to Jamuna, the Government residence of the Hon'ble Prime Minister and accordingly went therein. Before going there, as part of her duty as a Home Minister, She informed IGP Nur Mohammad, DMP Commissioner Naim Ahmed and DG RAB Khandaker Mahmud Hasan of the incident of BDR Headquarters over telephone and directed them to take necessary steps having observed the situation of the incident. As soon as she reached the residence of the Hon'ble Prime Minister she found her very anxious and depressed. However, in the meantime, the Hon'ble Prime Minister summoned the 3 Chiefs of 3 forces. The Hon'ble Prime Minister directed them to deploy army soldiers around the BDR Headquarters and to bring tanks therein. The Chief of Army Staff informed the Hon'ble Prime Minister that it would take two hours to deploy the army soldiers.

The aforesaid fact also stands supported by PW 368 Mr. Kamrul Islam, State Minister for Law, Justice and Parliamentary Affairs, who has stated in his evidence that at the time of occurrence he was in charge of State Minister of the Ministry of Law, Justice and Parliamentary Affairs. On 25.02.2009 he was at his residence in the morning. On the way to Secretariat at 10:00 a.m, he got massage of firings at Pilkhana and also received the same kind of message after arrival at office. He watched the incident of firings on TV sitting in the office room. At around 2:30-3:00 p.m, he came to the residence of the Hon'ble Prime Minister at Jamuna and found many leaders and the Chiefs of Army, Air and Navy forces. After a while he started for the Parliament. In the evening, watching Television, he came to see the Hon'ble Home Minister along with Minister for LGED and Whip Mr. Mirza Azam MP to have discussion with the BDR members sitting at Ambala Restaurant. Thereafter, he started for Ambala Restaurant situated near gate No.4 of BDR. He reached the Ambala Restaurant very quickly. Going therein he found 10/15 BDR members under the leadership of DAD Touhid discussing with some political leaders and then he also participated in that discussion. The BDR rebels raised their charters of demands. Some of the BDR rebels

With respect to the steps taken by the Hon’ble Prime Minister, PW 575 Barrister Mr. Fazle Noor Tapash, MP has stated in his evidence that he is a member of the parliament from constituency No.12 in Dhaka. He started his election campaign having nominated from Awami League in 2008. His election office was at road No.32 (old) at Dhanmondi. During the election campaign in November of 2008 some civil uniformed persons came to his election office and introduced themselves as the members of BDR as well as voters of his election area. In the context of election discussions they told him to inform about their grievances to the people’s leader Sheikh Hasina regarding their 100% ration facilities, promotion and going abroad in mission and then he assured them to apprise those grievances to the people’s leader Sheikh Hasina. Accordingly, he informed the people’s leader of their grievances. In the middle of December, 2008 some BDR members under the leadership of Zakir came to him again and then he told them that he had already informed the people’s leader of their grievances. On the date of election on 29.12.2008 he inspected the vote centres of his election area. On that

With reference to the roles and steps taken by the Hon’ble Prime Minister,  PW 316 Mr. Nur Mohammad, Inspector General of Police, Police Bhaban, 6 Mintu Road, DMP Dhaka has stated in his evidence that at present he has been serving as Ambassador in Morocco. Before joining as Ambassador in Morocco he served as IGP of Bangladesh Police. On 25.02.2009 while he was on duty in his office DG of RAB informed him of the firings at BDR Headquarters, Pilkhana and then he informed the incident to the Hon’ble Home Minister. On hearing she directed to take legal steps. He conveyed this message to the commissioner of Dhaka Metropolitan Police (DMP) and ordered him to deploy forces. He watched everything in TV channels. At around 10:00 a.m, DG of RAB, DMP Commissioner and DIG Battalion came to his office. He ordered them to deploy forces. The Hon’ble Home Minister informed him that the Hon’ble Prime Minister was discussing the matter with the chiefs of respective forces. Thereafter, he came to know that State Minister Mr. Jahangir Kabir Nanok MP and Whip Mr. Mirza Azam MP were entrusted with the responsibility by the Hon’ble Prime Minister to

In relation to the steps taken by the Hon’ble Prime Minister,  PW 331 Hassan Mahmud Khandaker, IGP and former DG of RAB has stated in his evidence that he was in active service joining as Inspector General of Bangladesh Police on 31.08.2010. He joined as DG of RAB on 20.08.2007 and performed his duty up to 30th August, 2010. On 25.02.2009 at 9:30 a.m, he was coming to the police headquarters for the purpose of Government work. On that time Lieutenant Colonel Shamsuzzaman Commanding Officer of RAB-2 informed him over cell phone that firings and chaos were being happened at the Darbar Hall of BDR Headquarters, Pilkhana. On receiving information this witness gave him necessary direction and informed this matter to the IG of Police. He reached the Police Headquarters at 10:00 a.m in the morning. The IG of Police was discussing the matter with the other officers of the Police. Thereafter, he directed Additional Director General and his commandant of RAB to take necessary steps in that regard. At around 10:30 a.m to 11:00 a.m the members of RAB took their position around the BDR Headquarters. The first group went near the BDR Headquarters and got intermittent sounds of firings. At

Regarding the steps taken by the Hon’ble Prime Minister,  PW 447 Md. Naim Ahmed, Additional IGP has stated in his evidence that at present he has been working as Principal in Police Academy at Sarda, Rajshahi. His rank is Additional IG of Police. On 25.02.2009, he had been working as Police Commissioner in Dhaka. In the morning at 9:50 a.m of 25.02.2009, he came to know about the firings at the Pilkhana over wireless conversations with Joint Commissioner (Traffic). As soon as he got the message he went to the Police Headquarters and discussed with IGP over the matters and then he came to police control room at Shahbag. Sitting in the control room, he directed DC Ramna and Lalbagh to deploy officers and forces to the respective area. He came to comprehend that something was happened inside the BDR premises. He started delivering order to all concerned in that regard. He got information to the effect that the State Minister Mr. Jahangir Kabir Nanok MP and Whip Mr. Mirza Azam MP would be appeared at gate No.4. For that reason he directed DC Ramna to remain with them. He transmitted 4 microphones there from Rajarbag. He came to know over radio that one farmer and one police constable

As to the steps taken by the Hon'ble Prime Minister,  PW 313 BA-1967 Major General Miah Md. Zainul Abedin has stated in his evidence that at present he is in service as Military Secretary to Hon'ble Prime Minister. He served as Director General of SSF from 19.01.2009-27.11.2011. On 25.02.2009 he was in routine briefing of SSF at the Prime Minister’s office. At 9:30 a.m, he got information that chaos was being happened at the Darbar Hall of BDR Headquarters, Pilkhana. Thereafter, he came to Jamuna, the Government residence of the Hon'ble Prime Minister at 10:15 a.m. The high officials and the security officers started coming to the Jamuna. He came to hear that firings were being opened at the Darbar Hall, BDR Headquarters, Pilkhana. Then he was trying to collect information of the incident. At 3:45 p.m, he got news to the effect that some BDR members had been brought at the main gate of Jamuna for the purpose of discussions with the Hon'ble Prime Minister. When the BDR members entered the main building of Jamuna through the main gate their bodies were searched at the archway. At that time he wrote down

With regard to the aforesaid video disk and a list containing the names of the BDR representatives who came to Jamuna for discussions and went away therefrom making discussions with the Hon’ble Prime Minister,  PW 314, BA-2962 Lieutenant Colonel Syed Ahmed Ali, has stated in his evidence that he is the director (operation) of Special Security Force (SSF) of Prime Minister’s Office, Dhaka. This witness further stated that on 30.12.2009 at 2:15 p.m, Major General Joynul Abedin DG SSF, PW 313 handed over a video CD and a list of names of BDR representatives who came to Jamuna on 25.02.2009 and went away therefrom after holding discussions with the Hon’ble Prime Minister during the time of BDR revolt and massacres at Pilkhana, BDR Headquarters happened on 25.02.2009, to Mr. Abdul Kahar Akand, the Investigating Officer (IO), The CD and a list contained the names of the BDR representatives This witness watched the video. He put his signature on the seizure list and on the alamats. The seizure list was exhibited as exhibit-280 and his signature was exhibited as exhibit-280(1). He put his signature on the CD which was exhibited as exhibit-LXXXIV+A. The CD was displayed before the Court. He signed the list containing the names of 12 persons. His signature was exhibited as exhibit-279(1).

Concerning the aforesaid video and the list of names of BDR representatives,  PW 315, BD-8880 Squardon Leader Md. Khalid Bin Salam, Deputy Director, Special Security Force (SSF), Prime Minister’s Office, Dhaka has stated in his evidence that he was Deputy Director of SSF. On 30.12.2009 at 2:15 p.m, a video CD and a list containing the names of BDR representatives were handed over to

Investigating Officer (IO) at the office room of DG, SSF in presence of this witness and  PW314 Lieutenant Colonel Syed Ahmed Ali. The said CD was displayed before handing over the same to the Investigating Officer (IO). Subsequently, he put his signature on the same as witness. The signature on the seizure list was exhibited as exhibit-280(2) and his signature on the disk was exhibited as exhibit- LXXXIV (B) and his signature on the list of the names of 12 persons was exhibited as exhibit-279(2).

As regards the steps taken by the Hon'ble Prime Minister, PW 288 Vice Admiral Zahiruddin Ahmed has stated in his evidence that he has been performing his duty as Chief of Bangladesh Navy from 29.01.2009. On 25.02.2009 at around 10:00 a.m, he was informed by his director (intelligence) of the chaotic situation which was being committed at the BDR Headquarters, Pilkhana, Dhaka. Subsequently, at about 1300 hours this witness was asked to meet the Hon'ble Prime Minister at Jamuna from the office of the Hon’ble Prime Minister. Having received the information he started for Jamuna instantly and reaching there he came to see Chief of Army Staff and Chief of Air Force. At that time the Hon'ble Prime Minister was in meeting with the members of cabinet at the 1st floor. During that time Major General Tarek Ahmed Siddiqui (Retd.), Security Adviser to the Hon'ble Prime Minister was present there. After an hour the Hon'ble Prime Minister came down and seated in the office taking them. During discussions Hon'ble Prime Minister said that there were 2 ways opened before them for resolving the issue arisen at BDR Headquarters, Pilkhana - one is compromise and another is Military Operations and on that

As far as the steps taken by the Hon'ble Prime Minister,  PW 301, Air Marshal Shah Md. Ziaur Rahman, Ex-Air force Chief  has stated in his evidence that he performed his duty as Air Force Chief from 08.04.2007 to 12.06.2012. While he was in Command Flight Safety Meeting on 25.02.2009, he received a phone call from Major General Tareq Ahmed Siddique (Retd), the Security Adviser to the Hon'ble Prime Minister at 9:30 a.m. He informed this witness of the chaotic situation happened inside the BDR Headquarters at Pilkhana and for that purpose whether he had any aircraft ready to fly at once. He informed Major General Tareq Ahmed Siddique (Retd), the Security Adviser to the Hon'ble Prime Minister that Helicopters were ready. He ordered this witness to fly the helicopters over the Pilkhana as quickly as possible and to give report as to what was being happened inside the Pilkhana after observing the situation from the sky. Pursuant to that order, at 10:30 a.m, he sent 2 Helicopters. One Helicopter was flown by Wing Commander Fakhruddin and another was flown by Wing Commander Nabi. After their observations, they informed this witness by radio set that many BDR rebels were involved in the incident remaining in different places such and such the roads and in between the trees. Initially, he directed them to

wilfully suppressed about the killing of army officers. Subsequently, this witness came to know that 57 army officers along with many others in total 74 persons were killed in the massacres at the Pilkhana. After the discussion at about 5:00 - 5:30 p.m, the delegation of BDR rebels went to the Pilkhana for the purpose of their surrender. Mr. Jahangir Kabir Nanok MP and Whip Mr. Mirza Azam MP also went with them at the Pilkhana. On 26.02.2009 at 11:00 a.m, as per direction, this witness sent FC-130 transport Biman to Sylhet for bringing the members of Para- commando Battalion in Dhaka and pursuant to that he brought a huge number of members of Para- commando Battalion in Dhaka at around 2:00 - 2:30 p.m.

The steps and initiatives taken by the Hon'ble Prime Minister for resolving crisis is highly praiseworthy and manifestation of mature leadership of the Hon'ble Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina. If on that time, the Hon'ble Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina could not have taken the necessary steps for the resolving the crisis, the newly formed Government headed by the Hon'ble Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina following the general election held in 2008 would have been detrimentally affected resulting in causing serious damage to the democracy in Bangladesh. The way the Hon’ble Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina resolved the crisis, the people of Bangladesh would remember the contribution of the Hon’ble Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina forever. The killing of 74 persons including 57 army officers, 9 BDR members, 7 civilians and one army person in the aforesaid BDR carnage incident is very gruesome, barbaric, diabolical and ghastly in nature.

The Steps taken by Army at the order of Hon’ble Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina, the Head of the Government.

Following the incident occurred at Pilkhana, the Hon’ble Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina became very anxious about the army officers in BDR and the BDR soldiers thinking of the situations that were prevailing at Pilkhana at that time. As soon as the Hon’ble Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina came to know about the revolt of BDR rebels at Pilkhana, she summoned three Chiefs of three forces and directed them to deploy army around the BDR Headquarters bringing tanks therein. On such situation, the Chief of Army Staff informed the Hon’ble Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina that it would take about two hours to deploy the army. The Hon’ble Prime Minister also directed them to send helicopters to see the situation from the sky and following the order of the Hon’ble Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina, the concerned Chief of Air Force sent some helicopters which flew several times over the Pilkhana. At that time, some BDR rebels opened fires aiming at the helicopters. The aforesaid facts of calling three Chiefs of three forces and the order of deployment of army around the pilkhana by the Hon’ble Prime Minister Sheikh Hasina has been described in the evidence of  PW634 Advocate Sahara Khatun, Hon'ble Minister for Post and Telecommunication Ministry of Government of Bangladesh, who has stated in her evidence that at the time of occurrence, she was the Home Minister. The alleged occurrence took place on 25.02.2009. In the morning of that day at around 9:30 a.m, she was informed of the firings at the BDR Headquarters from a nearby place of BDR Headquarters at Zigatala.

With regard to the steps taken by Bangladesh Army at the order of the Hon’ble Prime Minister, PW 534 BA-2046 Brigadier General Md. Abdul Hakim Aziz, PSC (Retd), Commander of 46 Independent Infantry Brigade, Dhaka Cantonment, Dhaka has stated in his evidence that he joined in Bangladesh Army in 1979. Having obtained commission he performed his service in different places in home and abroad and thereafter he joined as a commander of 46 Independent Infantry Brigade on 14.01.2007. On 24.02.2009 he was posted at School and Infantry Tactics (SI&T). But he performed his duty as a commander of 46 Independent Infantry Brigade from 25.02.2009 following the situation arisen therein. On 25.02.2009 at 9:00 a.m, he was staying in his office. On that day the Hon’ble President was supposed to place flower wreath at Shika Anirban under the supervision of his Brigade and to visit guard of honour at Senakunja. In the afternoon of that day there was a concluding day for final athletic competition in between the inter-forces. More or less all the units subordinate to his Brigade were entrusted with such duties. In the morning after inspecting rehearsal of guards this witness was staying at his office at 9:30 a.m. In the meantime, his staff officer Brigade Major Mahmudul Kabir informed him of firings at the BDR premises. From the Directorate of Military Operations (MO), 3 companies of his Brigade were directed to proceed towards the Headquarters at Pilkhana.

Thereafter, this witness directed Brigade Major to prepare 3 companies taking one from 2nd East Bengal, 4 East Bengal and 17 East Bengal each. Immediately after leaving of Brigade Major from his office, Lieutenant Colonel Alim Commanding Officer (at present Colonel) of 17 East Bengal, who was subordinate to him informed this witness that PSO, AFD Lieutenant General Abdul Mobin talked with Lieutenant Colonel Alim over telephone and directed Lieutenant Colonel Alim to proceed towards the BDR Headquarters with a company taking 1st line pouch ammunitions and arms. At that time this witness assured Colonel Alim of sending forces and also informed him of the orders given by the higher authorities. This witness told Lieutenant Colonel Alim about the order given from the Directorate of Military Operations (MO). This witness also informed him that

Brigade Major would co-ordinate the matter. After talking with Colonel Alim, the then Director, Military Operations (MO) Brigadier General Zia told him over telephone that 46 Independent Infantry Brigade would have to be proceeded towards the BDR Headquarters at Pilkhana after assessing the future situation. After completion of some activities in his Brigade he was entrusted with a duty to encircle the Pilkhana and to make communication with BDR rebels collecting microphones from the nearby mosques. He was also directed not to open any fire without the order of Military Operations (MO) Director and to operate Military Operations subject to the order of the authority. On getting such order this witness summoned his Brigade Major to his office and also directed him to give order to all the units to proceed towards the Headquarters, Pilkhana taking maximum forces, but keeping sufficient forces in the Brigade. At the same time this witness also directed all the CO and OCs to join his briefings. At around 9:45-10:15 a.m. all the CO and OCs came to his office for briefings and orders. Thereafter, he gave his briefing and order to all of them. He ordered that 2nd East Bengal Regiment would proceed towards the way situated at the backside of Pilkhana coming from Kamrangirchar and take ambush therein and 4 East Bengal and 17 East Bengal Regiment would go near gate No.4 adjacent to Rifles Square through the way coming from Dhanmondi area and take ambush therein and 4 Field Regiment Artillery would go towards gate No.3 of the Pilkhana through the New Market area and take ambush therein. He also directed that among the other units of brigade, 43 Field Company (Engineers), 102 Brigade Signal Company and ad hoc field workshop

witness and his subordinate CO's in the cantonment for attending to the briefing of the Chief of Army Staff (CAS). At around 2.00 hours they all remained present at CAS Secretariat at Army Headquarters. In that place, at 2.30 hours at noon, Chief of Army Staff General Moeen-U-Ahmed briefed them and gave his order. In that place other Brigade Commanders, CGS, DMO, DMI, Director Air operations were present. In that briefing they were directed to take possession of Pilkhana. The time for raid was fixed at 16.30 hours. Subsequently, it was decided to be held at 17.00 hours. After coming back from the briefing, this witness briefed about the order to his CO and OC's and co- ordinated different matters together. Immediately after that decision Tanks and APC joined with them at Dhanmondi. Thereafter, all the units finally took their stand to make raid at Pilkhana. Before doing that they

assembled in front of Stamford University to make raid at Pilkhana. A few time ago of around 17.00 hours he was informed that the situation was going to be improved gradually through political discussion. As a result the earlier fixed time for attack at 17.00 hours was cancelled and his entire brigade was directed to return at abahani field. On 26.02.2009, at around 11.00 hours in the night this witness was directed that search and rescue operation would be conducted inside the Pilkhana from 8.30 hours in the morning of 27.02.2009. Chief of General Staff directed him in that regard. Before starting search and rescue operation inside the Pilkhana he was also directed to make coordination with the police deployed therein by that time. In the said night, in order to carry out search and rescue operation this witness briefed all the CO/ OCs and distributed works among them. In the morning of 27.02.2009 they could not start that operation because one of the police officer could not join them by that time. As a result, on that day in the morning at 10.30 hours, when the advanced group of his brigade reached gate No. 4 of BDR Headquarters, they found the same under lock and key and also found many members of police and RAB and some members of fire brigade. When they reached there the police officer on duty talked with his higher officer and thereafter he opened the gate. They entered therein and found many arms and ammunitions lying scattered in different places and assisted the police for collecting the same. In the first day they recovered in all 38 dead bodies from a mass grave beside the mortuary adjacent to BDR hospital. On 28.02.2009 they got information of 3 mass graves behind MT garage near the field of 13 rifles Battalion and

With respect to the steps taken by Bangladesh Army at the order of the Hon’ble Prime Minister, PW 535 Colonel Md. Abdul Alim Tarafder, at present Comilla Cantonment has stated in his evidence that

on 25.02.2009, he was in active service as commanding officer of 17 East Bengal under 46 Independent Infantry Brigade at Dhaka cantonment. On that day there were 2 events of his units to be performed- one was to give guard of honour to the Hon’ble President at Senakunja and the other was to conduct final athletic competition in between the inter- forces at army stadium. On 25.02.2009 in the morning at 9:30 a.m Principal Staff Officer (PSO) of Armed Forces Division (AFD) informed him over land phone of the firings happened at the Pilkhana a few times ago. On hearing of the news, this witness rapidly directed the concerned officer to make arms and 1st line pouch ammunitions along with soldiers ready for going to the Pilkhana forming a company from 17 East Bengal. Thereafter, this witness instantly informed this matter to the brigade commander of 46

Independent Infantry Brigade and ordered his subordinate officers to march towards the Pilkhana under the leadership of Major Imran taking a company of army soldiers. In the meantime, Major Mahmud, Brigade Major of 46 Independent Infantry Brigade informed him that except the on-duty soldiers and the highly responsible persons, entire battalion would have to be prepared with 1st line pouch arms and ammunitions. Brigade Commander also ordered this witness to take RR, Machine Gun (MG), Light Machine Gun (LMG), 60 m.m mortar, grenade firing rifle and rocket launcher (RL) with them. This witness instantly informed this matter to all officers present at the battalion and told them to get ready. In the meantime, brigade commander from the Brigade Sadar summoned all the commanding officers for his briefings. Brigade Commander gave primary order after describing the whole situation and at the same time, he also communicated the said order to all his subordinate commanding officers. As per order, 17 East Bengal was directed to remain in the opposite side of gate No. 4 at Pilkhana and to take their stand in a convenient place and 4 East Bengal was directed to follow up them. At that time it was at about 9:45 hours in the morning. It was mentioned in that order that no firing could be opened without the order of brigade commander and subsequent necessary order would be given considering the situation. Coming back to his working place from Brigade Sadar, at around 10 hours in the morning, this witness quickly sent Major Arefin and Captain Saidul under the leadership of Major Waker of the 1st company. At that time at the order of M.O of Army Headquarters and the brigade commander he sent Major Imran for special operation

and told him to go to the Army Headquarters. At around 10:15 to 10:30 a.m, taking the 1st group, Major Waker took stand at tactic places at the neighbouring places of Japan Bangladesh Hospital opposite to gate No.4 of Pilkhana. At around 11:30 a.m, this witness along with Captain Azmi, Captain Reza and Lieutenant Mainul started for the destination of Major Waker and reached there at 12.10 at noon and at that time, 106 m.m RR, MG, 60 m.m Mortar, GP Rifle and rocket launcher (RL) were with him. On arrival thereat, he came to see Major Waker who at the order of this witness was giving declaration through miking repeatedly in order to stop firings by the BDR rebels and to resolve the problems through discussions. When this witness informed that matter to his brigade commander, he directed them to continue the same and to ascertain the location of heavy and deadly

weapons and other locations of the BDR rebels. At that time intermittent firings were continuing inside the BDR Headquarters at Pilkhana. With the help of using mike, they tried to make communication with the BDR rebels and they also tried to identify their locations from their hiding places. At around 9:30 p.m, the brigade commander of 46 Independent Infantry Brigade directed commanding officer of 17 East Bengal to shift their stand from present position to the Abahani field. According to the order this witness with his troops went there and waited there with war like preparation for further order. On 26.02.2009 at around 1:30 p.m all the commanding officers were directed to go to the cantonment from brigade Headquarters. This witness rushed to that place as quickly as possible. At that time, 2IC Major Waker was with him. At around 2:30 p.m, Chief of Army Staff (CAS) in presence of Chief of General Staff (CGS) briefed them directing to take over position of Pilkhana within afternoon of 26.02.2009 through Military Operations. After returning to the Battalion this witness made necessary briefing to all officers showing them eye-sketch map and briefed all the soldiers with regard to their movements making them fall-in. On that day at around 4:30 p.m, this witness prepared his whole battalion for attacking Pilkhana. After a while tank and APC merged with them. On that time, Military Operations time was fixed at 4:30 p.m. Subsequently, the time for attacking Pilkhana was refixed at 5:00 p.m shifting from 4:30 p.m. After about 1 hour, brigadier commander informed them that the time for attacking Pilkhana was changed. Subsequently, it was informed that the time for attacking Pilkhana would be fixed in the

  1.            BA-1439 Major General Shakil Ahmed, ndc, psc, Director General (DG), BDR.
  2.            BA-2441 Colonel Md. Akhter Hossain, psc, G+, Sector Commander, Chittagong.
  3.            BA-2508 Colonel Shamsul Arefin Ahmed, psc, Sector Commander, Kustia.
  4.            BA-2601 Colonel Md. Shawkat Imam, psc, G+, Sector Commander, Khagrachari.
  1.            BA-2440 Colonel Md. Rezaul Kabir, afwc, Director (Admin), Administrative Directorate, BDR Headquarters, Pilkhana.
  2.            BA-2409 Colonel Md. Naqibur Rahman, psc, Sector Commander, Comilla.
  3.            BA-2446 Colonel Nafiz Uddin Ahmed, psc, Commandant Rifle Training Centre and School (RTC&S).
  4.            BA-2526 Colonel Kazi Moazzem Hussain, psc, Sector Commander, Rangamati.
  5.            BA-2324 Colonel Mohammad Moshiur Rahman, psc, Director of Communication Directorate, BDR Headquarters, Pilkhana, Dhaka.
  6.      BA-2669 Colonel Md. Emdadul Islam, psc, Sector Commander, Khulna.
  7.      BA-2449 Colonel Quazi Emdadul Haque, psc, Sector Commander, Rajshahi.
  1.      BA-118018 Doctor Lieutenant Colonel Quazi Robee Rahman, Dental Surgeon, BDR Hospital, Dhaka.
  2.      BA-10086 Doctor Lieutenant Colonel Lutfar Rahman Khan, Psychology Specialist, BDR Hospital, Dhaka.
  3.      BA-2806 Lieutenant Colonel Md. Lutfar Rahman, psc, CO of 24 Rifles Battalion, BDR Headquarters, Pilkhana, Dhaka.
  4.      BA-2353 Lieutenant Colonel Md. Badrul Huda, CO of 13 Rifles Battalion, BDR Headquarters, Pilkhana, Dhaka.
  5.      BA-2516 Lieutenant Colonel Md. Saiful Islam @ Saif @ Shahid, GSO-1 (Ops) Operation and Training Directorate, BDR Headquarters, Pilkhana, Dhaka.
  1.      BA-1891 Lieutenant Colonel Enshad Ibn Amin, G+, CO of Rifles Security Unit, BDR Headquarters, Pilkhana, Dhaka.
  2.      BA-3445 Major Humayun Haider, psc, Int Officer, 36 Rifle Battalion, BDR Headquarters, Pilkhana, Dhaka.
  3.      BA-3453 Major Md. Azharul Islam, psc, Second- In- Command (2IC), 23 Rifle Battalion, Khulna.
  4.      BA-2847 Major Mohammed Saleh, DAAG Administration, BDR Headquarters, Pilkhana, Dhaka.
  5.      BA-4233 Major Mohammad Maksum-Ul-Hakim, Ops Officer, 24 Rifle Battalion, BDR Headquarters, Pilkhana, Dhaka.
  6.      BA-3393 Major Mustaque Mahmud @ Mahmud, psc, Second-In-Command (2IC), Sadar Rifle Battalion, BDR Headquarters, Pilkhana, Dhaka.
  1.      BA-3191 Major Mahmood Hasan, GSO-2 Sector Headquarter, BDR Headquarters, Pilkhana, Dhaka.
  2.      BA-3396 Major Mahmudul Hasan, GSO-2 (Intelligence), Operation and Training Directorate, BDR Headquarters, Pilkhana, Dhaka.
  3.      BA-3716 Major Mahbubur Rahman.
  4.      BA-4098 Major Md. Mizanur Rahman, GSO-2 (Training) Training Branch, BDR Headquarters, Pilkhana, Dhaka.
  5.      BA-2711 Major Quazi Mosaddek Hossain, Second-In-Command (2IC), 33 Rifles Battalion.
  6.      BA-3689 Major Md. Khalid Hossain, GSO-2 (Cods), Secretary of Director General, BDR Headquarters, Pilkhana, Dhaka.
  7.      BA-4762 Major Md. Rafiqul Islam, JAG Head Quarters, BDR Headquarters, Pilkhana, Dhaka.
  1.      RDO-161 DAD Masum Khan, ARO, Records Wing, BDR Headquarters, Pilkhana, Dhaka.

      The 8 dead bodies which were recovered from the largest mass grave could not be identified by this witness as the same were decomposed.

This witness came to see 8 dead bodies which were recovered from the mortuary of the BDR hospital and names of the dead bodies identified by this witness are as follows:-  

  1.            BA-3550 Major Md. Humayun Kabir Sarker, GSO-2 (Ops), Training Directorate, BDR Headquarters, Pilkhana, Dhaka.
  2.            RDO-87 AD Khandaker Abdul Awal, DAA And QMG, Dhaka Sector, BDR Headquarters, Pilkhana, Dhaka.
  1.            JCO-4377 Subedar Assistant Md. Abul Kasem, Head Assistant, Admin. Branch, BDR Headquarters, Pilkhana, Dhaka.
  2.            Naik Assistant-60835, Md. Boshir Uddin, Clerk Q and Ord Branch, BDR Headquarters, Pilkhana, Dhaka.
  3.            Lance Naik-51932 Md. Manik Miah, 36 Rifles Battalion, BDR Headquarters, Pilkhana, Dhaka.
  4.            Sepoy-66524 Ruhul Amin @ Bulbul, 37 Rifles Battalion.

      The 2 dead bodies which were recovered from the mortuary of the BDR hospital could not be identified by this witness as the same were decomposed.

On that day, he recorded the video of 1st mass grave by his personal mobile. During trial this witness submitted a CD of the video before the court and the same was exhibited as CLXXXIII.

On 28.02.2009 at around 10:30 a.m, 3 mass graves situated side by side were discovered from the west side of the field adjacent to MT garage of 13 Rifle Battalion and 10 dead bodies were recovered there from. The names of the army officers and others whose dead bodies were recovered from the 3 mass graves and identified by this witness are as follows:-  

  1.            BA-5306 Major Muhammad Mosharof Hossain, ATO Q and Ord Branch, BDR Headquarters, Pilkhana, Dhaka.
  2.            BA-2480 Major Md. Mokbul Hossain, Second- In-Command(2IC), 36 Rifles Battalion, BDR Headquarters, Pilkhana, Dhaka.
  3.            BA-4711 Major Syed Md. Idris Iqbal, Operation Officer-30 Rifle Battalion, Panchari, Khagrachari
  1.            BA-2624 Major Hossain Sohel Shahnewaz, ZSO, Rifle Security Unit (RSU), BDR Headquarters, Pilkhana, Dhaka.
  2.            Mrs. Naznin Shakil Shipu (Wife of DG BDR)

In order to perform the work of recovery of dead bodies, it became night. After the recovery of dead bodies, this witness went to different quarters, officers mess and soldiers line. On 28.02.2009 at around 3:15 p.m he went to the soldiers lines of 44 Rifle Battalion. Going thereat, he came to see bullet proof jacket, LMG, monies and gold ornaments fallen scattered in the different floors. The amount of those items was so huge that looking at them this witness presumed that many BDR soldiers of 44 Rifle Battalion were involved in the commission of BDR revolt. He came to see many vehicles in a burnt condition. They set up their camp at Nur Mohammad School and college at Pilkhana and stayed therein till 17.03.2009.   

As regards the steps taken by Bangladesh Army at the order of the Hon’ble Prime Minister, PW 536 BA-2902 Brigadier General Waker-Uz-Zaman, commander of 46 Independent Infantry Brigade, Dhaka Cantonment has stated in his evidence that on 25.02.2009, he was working as Second-In-Command (2IC) of 17 East Bengal Regiment situated in Dhaka Cantonment. On that day at around 9:30 a.m his Commander Lieutenant Colonel Alim informed him of the chaos committed by the BDR rebels inside the Pilkhana and for that reason they had to go there. At the order of his Commander, taking a troop of 40 soldiers along with arms and ammunitions this witness started for Pilkhana in the morning at around 10:10 a.m. In the morning at around 10:45 a.m, they reached a place at Sath Masjid road which was 100-150 yards in the north from gate No. 4 of Pilkhana. At that time violent firings were being opened inside the Pilkhana. He disbursed the troops and deployed them in different places and went on the roof of Japan Bangladesh Hospital walking through the inside and tried to assess what was being happened inside the Pilkhana. He stayed therein for the subsequent order. At the order of his commander, this witness called the BDR rebels remaining inside the Pilkhana to be calm and quiet through the announcement by microphone and tried to know about the incident. For the convenience of discussion with the BDR rebels he stayed in the western side at Road No. 27 at the order of his commander till 6:00 p.m on that day and spent the night therein. On 26.02.2009 at around 2:30 p.m this witness went to cantonment in order to participate

The aforesaid steps taken by army at the order of the Hon’ble Prime Minister have been supported and corroborated by the evidence given by PW-537 BA- 4784 Lt Col Mahmudul Kabir, psc, PW-538 BA- 4815 Maj Arefin, PW-539 BA-5541 Maj Barkot Ullah Chowdhury, PW-540 BA-6670 Capt AFM Rahmot Ullah, PW-541 BA-6834 Capt Mahmudur Rahman Roman and PW-542 BA-7025 Capt ABM Shah Reza.

The legal steps taken by the State for the killings and massacres committed by the BDR rebels at Pilkhana.

For the aforesaid incident, an FIR was lodged by PW 1, Nabo Jothi Khisa, officer-in-charge of Lalbag Police Station, Dhaka. Having received the FIR, the same was registered as Lalbag Police Station Case No. 65 dated 28.02.2009 under Sections 120B/121/121A/ 124A/148/149/447/448/332/333/353/342/343/324/325

/

326/307/435/436/427/380/382/411/302/201/114/109/3

4 of the Penal Code. After receiving the FIR, Mr.

Nabo Jothi Khisha, Officer-in-Charge, Lalbag Police

Station was appointed as investigating officer of the

case. Subsequently, the case was transferred to CID

for investigation by the order of the Police

Headquarters under Memo No. Aciva-1/10- 2009(wewWAvi)/684 ZvwiL 01/03/2009. Then Mr. Abdul

Kahar Akando was appointed as investigating officer

as per order under Memo No. wmAvBwW XvKv †g‡U«v/wcwe/13- 09/1613/1(4) ZvwiL 01/03/2009. On 05.04.2009, the

investigating officer of the case filed an application to

the court for transferring the case from Lalbag Police

Station to New Market Police Station on the ground

that the Pilkhana was included to New Market Police Station as per Notification published in the Bangladesh Gazette on 06.06.2005 and thereafter the learned judge of the Court below allowed the application transferring the case from Lalbag Police Station to New Market Police Station as per Section 529 and 531 of the Code of Criminal Procedure on 05.04.2009. Thereafter, Lalbag Police Station Case No. 65 dated 28.02.2009 was transferred to New Market Police Station under Memo No. wmGgGg-09/367 ZvwiL: 06/04/2009, and the same was registered as New Market Police Station Case No. 09 dated 06.04.2009.

After the occurrence, the concerned authorities were hanging in balance as to whether the trial of the offenders would be held under the Army Act or under the Bangladesh Penal Code in criminal Court. Under the circumstances, the Hon’ble President of the

country acting through the Ministry of Law, Justice and Parliamentary Affairs vide Memo. No. wePvi-3/1 Gg-6/2009-685 dated 17.08.2009 sent a reference to the Appellate Division addressing the Registrar of the Supreme Court of Bangladesh for reporting its opinion back to him on the following two questions raised in the backdrop of the facts stated in the Letter of Reference.

(A)        Whether the provisions of the Army Act, 1952 (Act XXIX of 1952) can be applied against the BDR personnel involved in the incident aforesaid?

(B)         In the event, the answer to the aforesaid question “(A)” is in the negative, whether the provisions of Army Act, 1952 can be applied against the said BDR personnel by issuing notification under Section 5 of the Army Act, 1952?

The Appellate Division by its opinion held the view that the provision of the Army Act, 1952 cannot be applied to the BDR personnel who perpetrated the Pilkhana carnage during the period between 25th and 26th February, 2009 and they cannot even be tried under the provision of Army Act, 1952 even after publication of a notification under Section 5 of the said Act. In view of the decision of reference case No.1 of 2009 the trial of the offenders of such incident took place under the Penal Code in Ordinary Criminal Court.

Mr. Abdul Kahar Akando, the investigating officer, after completion of the investigation submitted the charge-sheet against 824 accused on 12.07.2010 under

Sections120B/121/121A/124A/148/149/447/448/332/ 333/353/342/343/324/325/326/307/435/436/427/380/ 382/411/302/201/114/109/34 of the Penal Code. The charge-sheet was accepted on 26.07.2010 by Mr. Sk. M.  Tofayel Hasan, Metropolitan Magistrate, Dhaka and thereafter on 23.09.2010 after taking cognizance, the records of the case was sent to the court of Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Dhaka for trial. The records of the case was received on 03.10.2010 by the Court of Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Dhaka and the same was registered as Metropolitan Sessions Case No. 9629 of 2010. On 05.01.2011, the learned Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Dhaka having considered the prosecution materials on records took cognizance against the accused of the case under Sections 120B/121/121A/ 124A/148/149/447/448/332/333/353/342/343/324/325

/

326/307/435/436/427/380/382/411/302/201/114/109/3

4 of the Penal Code. On 03.02.2011, the State through Public Prosecutor filed an application for further investigation of the case before the trial court and the learned Judge of the trial Court allowed the application on the same date. On receipt of the order dated 10.02.2011 through Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Dhaka, the investigating officer being appointed as investigating officers under Memo No. wmAvBwW/XvKv †g‡U«v/wcwW/13-09/15-26 ZvwiL 14/02/2011, further investigated the case and after further investigation submitted the supplementary charge- sheet against 26 accused under Sections 120B/121/121A/124A/148/149/ 447/448/332/333/353/342/343/324/325/326/307/435/ 436/427/380/382/411/302/201/114/109/34 of the

Penal Code. On 22.03.2011, the supplementary charge-sheet was accepted by the Metropolitan Magistrate, Dhaka and thereafter the records was sent to the Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Dhaka for trial. On 23.03.2011 the supplementary charge-sheet was received by the Metropolitan Sessions Judge, Dhaka for trial.

The learned trial judge took cognizance and framed charge against the accused.

       On 28.03.2011, the learned Judge of the trial Court in consideration of prosecutions materials took cognizance in respect of 26 accused under Sections 120B/121/121A/124A/148/149/447/448/332/333/353/ 342/343/324/325/326/307/435/436/427/380/382/411/ 302/201/114/109/34 of the Penal Code.

The learned Judge of the trial Court considering the facts and circumstances of the case and the prosecution materials on records framed charge against 850 accused under Sections120B/121/121A/124A/148/149/447/448/ 332/333/353/342/343/324/325/326/307/435/436/427/ 380/382/411/302/201/114/109/34 of the Penal Code and the same was read over to the accused and they pleaded not guilty and prayed for trial.

       The prosecution examined as many as 654 witnesses to prove the prosecution case and on the other hand, the defence examined in all 24 witnesses in support of their defence pleas. Before delivery of the judgment, the accused were examined under Section 342 of the Code of Criminal Procedure wherein they once again pleaded not guilty and claimed to be innocent. Before the pronouncement of the judgment, the charge was altered on 20.10.2013. The delivery of judgment by the learned trial judge

After conclusion of the trial, on 05.11.2013, the learned Judge of the trial Court considering the evidence of 654 prosecution witnesses, confessional statements of the accused, the attending facts and circumstances of the case  and the evidence of 24 defence witnesses along with other prosecution and defence materials handed down death sentence to 152 accused, life imprisonment to 160 accused, imprisonment for various terms to 256 accused and acquitted 278 accused of the charge levelled against them. It may be mentioned that 4 accused died during trial of the case and 11 accused died after delivery of the judgement by the learned trial judge and during hearing of the death reference together with the connecting criminal appeals. Anyway, after delivery of judgment, the learned Judge of the trial Court sent the above named death reference to this Court under Section 374 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

Being aggrieved by the judgment and order of conviction and sentence passed by the learned judge of the trial Court in Metropolitan Sessions Case No. 9629 of 2009, the condemned prisoners and the convicts being appellants preferred the above mentioned criminal appeals and Jail appeals before this Court. The State also preferred Government Criminal Appeal No. 03 of 2014 against 69 accused out of 278 accused, who got acquittal of the charges by the said judgment and order.

        It may be stated that immediately before conclusion of hearing of death reference and other criminal appeals, the State submitted Government Criminal Rule No.125 (Con-A) of 2017 for condonation of delay of 1063 days in filing the petition of appeal before this court under Section 417(1)(a) of the Code of Criminal Procedure against the judgment and order by which C.S accused No. 105 Pachok/3861 Md. Selim and 193 others were acquitted of all the charges levelled against them under Section 302 and other sections of the Penal Code by the learned trial Judge, Government Criminal Rule No.124 (Con-A) of 2017 for condonation of delay of 1063 days in filing the petition of appeal for enhancement of sentence before this court under Section 417A of the Code of Criminal Procedure against the judgment and order by which C.S accused No. 14 Subedar (Retd) Hazi Md. Torab Ali and 157 others who were convicted under Section 302 and other sections of the Penal Code to suffer rigorous imprisonment for life by the learned trial Judge and Government Criminal Rule No.123 (Con-A) of 2017

dated 06.06.2017 dismissed the aforesaid criminal appeals of the ground of limitation as those were not filed before the court within the period of limitation. Defence Case of the convicts/accused.

       The defence case of the convicts/accused, in short, is that the convicts/accused are not involved in the commission of murder and other offences as has been brought against them in the prosecution materials and in the evidence. The convicts/accused are totally innocent and they have been falsely implicated in this case out of previous enmity and grudge at the instance of some designing quarters. There is no corroborative evidence on the records in order to connect the convicts/accused with the alleged offence of murder and other offences. The confessional statements taken from the convicts/ accused are not true and voluntary since those were extracted from them out of physical

torture, threat and duress. Moreover, at the time of recording confessional statements, the provisions of Sections 164 and 364 of the Code of Criminal Procedure have not been properly complied with in accordance with law. From the trend of cross- examinations, it is further evident that the investigation of the case was not done properly following the mandate of law as a result of which the whole investigation report has become perfunctory in nature. Apart from this, the convicts/accused were not identified on the dock as per Section 9 of the Evidence Act, 1872. The order of framing charge is defective and the post-mortem report does not tally with the story of killing of the army officers by the BDR rebels. Furthermore, the statements of the convicts/accused at the time of examining them under Section 342 of the Code of Criminal Procedure have

not been considered in proper perspective. Under the aforesaid defence case as made out by the convicts/accused, the death reference should be rejected and the criminal appeals against the convicts sentence are liable to be allowed for ends of justice and the accused are liable to be acquitted of the charge levelled against them. Since the defence case of the convicts/accused, the defence materials, the evidence of defence witnesses (DWs), the legal decisions and the statements submitted before the trial court at the time of examining them under Section 342 of the Code of Criminal Procedure have been thoroughly discussed and elaborately explained by Mr. Justice Md. Abu Zafor Siddique, I have taken decision not to discuss and explain the selfsame matters for coming to a decision in the matter of defence case as it will cause repetition of the same facts, materials and evidence on record.     

Hearing of Death Reference together with other connected appeals by this Special Bench

The learned Judges of this Special Bench have taken up all the criminal appeals, Jail appeals, the Government appeals and death reference together for hearing.

Arguments advanced by the learned Attorney- General.

        Mr. Mahbubey Alam, the learned Attorney- General for Bangladesh along with Mr. K.M. Zahid Sarwar, the learned Deputy-Attorney appearing on behalf of the State, categorically submits as under:-

  1. that the convicts/accused following conspiracy taken in different places taking common intention and common object in order to eliminate the army officers from the BDR atrociously killed 74 persons making unlawful assembly and the prosecution by adducing reliable, cogent and satisfactory evidence before the court has proved the offences against the convicts/accused beyond all reasonable doubt and suspicion.
  1. That most of the convicts/accused made inculpatory 164 statements involving themselves with offences and the same appear to be true and voluntary and in that view of the matter, the convicts were rightly convicted and sentenced by the learned trial judge and in the same manner, the accused should also be convicted and sentenced by this court.
  1.         That in view of Section 10 of the Evidence Act, 1872, the confession of an accused may be used as evidence against the other co-accused and the materials like leaflets can also be used as evidence against the convicts/accused.
  2.        That though charge has been framed against the convicts/accused both under Sections 34 and 149 of the Penal Code but the fact remains that Section 149 of the penal Code is more wider than Section 34 of the penal Code and as such, the application of Section 149 of the penal Code is applicable in the present case at hand.
  3.            that there are positive, tangible and circumstantial evidence on records with regard to criminal conspiracy, common intention, common object and unlawful assembly against the convicts/accused.
  1. that the commission of murder committed by the convicts has been proved beyond doubt by direct evidence as well as by medical evidence.
  2. that an accused may be convicted and sentenced basing on an evidence of a single witness provided that the evidence is not tainted by any means and it has legal weight putting the same in legal scale and weight.

VIII.that the BDR rebels at the time of commission of murder and other offences carried very heavy and deadly weapons with them and they also used highly

objectionable filthy languages towards the army officers and committed very barbarous, horrendous and atrocious massacres in and around the BDR Headquarters at Pilkhana, from which it is crystal clear that the BDR rebels following the criminal conspiracy together with common intention and common object killed the army officers and committed other offences.    

Mr. Mahbubey Alam, the learned Attorney- General for Bangladesh along with Mr. K.M Zahid Sarwar, the learned Deputy Attorney-General, in support of his contentions and deliberations has referred a number of decisions in the cases of Kehar Singh and others V. The State (Delhi Admin) reported in AIR (1988)(SC)1833, popularly known as Indira Gandhi Murder Case,  The State V. Nalini, AIR(1999)(SC)2640, popularly known as Rajib Gandhi murder case, Major Md. Bazlul Huda (artillery) and others V. The State, ADC vol. VI(A)(2010)=18BLT(AD)03 popularly known as Bangabandhu Sheik Mujibur Rahman murder case, Zulfikar Ali Bhutto V. The State, PLD(1979)(SC)53, Barendra Kumar Ghose V. Emperor, AIR (1925) PC1, Yakub Abdul Razak Memon and others V. State of Maharashtra, (2013)13SCC1, Bhuboni Sahu V. The State, AIR (1949)PC 257, Kashmira Singh V. The State of Madhya Pradesh, AIR (1952) (SC)159, Sahoo V.  The State of Uttar Pradesh, AIR (1966)(SC)40, Mirza Akbor V. The King Emperor, AIR (1940)PC176, State V. Novjot Sandhu @ Afsan Guru, (2005), 11 SCC 600 , Tukaram Gonapat V. State of Maharashtra AIR(1974) (SC)514, Kasab @ Abu

Mujahid V. State of Maharashtra, (2012) 9SCC1, Rosul Bux V. The State, 22DLR(SC)297, Tozammel Hossain V. The State, 28DLR(AD)270, A.K.M Abdus Samad and others V. The State, 44DLR(AD) (1992)233, the case of Mufti A. Hannan Munshi @ Abdul Kalam and others V. The State, Mobile Kader case, Abdus Sattar and others V.  State 14BLD(AD)(1994)133, Altaf Hossain V. The State, 50DLR(AD)(1998)120, ASI Md. Ayub  Ali Sarder and another V. State, 23BLD(HCD) (2003)181, The State V. Tajul Islam and 8 others,  15BLD (1995)(HCD)53, Shahadat Khan and others V. Home Secretary to the Government of West Pakistan and others, 21DLR(SC)(1959)323, Bangladesh V. Abed Ali, 36DLR (AD) (1984)234, Abu Sayed and another V. The State, 38DLR(1986)17, Bhagwan Swarup V. The State of Maharashtra, AIR(1965)(SC)682, Moqbool Hossain V. The State, 12DLR(SC)217, Hargun  Sundar Das V. State of Maharashtra, AIR (1970)(SC)1514,  Ram Sanjiwan Singh V. State of Bihar, AIR 1996SC3265, Suresh Chandra Bahri V. Gurbachan Singh, AIR 1994 SC 2420, Sarder Sadrul Singh Caveeshar V. State of Maharashtra AIR1965SC 682, (1973) 2 Supreme Court Cases 793, 1988 (Supp) Supreme Court Cases 241, (1999) 9 Supreme Court Cases 525, (2000) 1 Supreme Court Cases 247, (2002) 8 Supreme Court Cases 381, (2005) 6 Supreme Court Cases 101, (2006) 3 Supreme Court Cases 374, (2004) 10 Supreme Court Cases 692, (2008)  12 Supreme Court Cases 51, (1971) 3 Supreme Court Cases 432, 2003 Supreme Court Cases (Cri) 2033, (1981) 2 Supreme Court Cases 443, AIR 1961 Supreme Court 1762, (1977) 4 Supreme Court Cases 540, (2001) 7 Supreme Court Cases 596, (2002) 7 Supreme Court

Arguments made by the learned Government prosecutor acted as Additional Attorney-General.

Mr. Mosharraf Hossain Kazol, the Government Prosecutor acted as Additional Attorney-General along with Mr. Monjur Mohammad Shahnewaz, Assistant Attorney-General appearing for the State, submits as follows:-

  1. that the convicts/accused following the criminal conspiracy went to different places and met different persons for materializing their demands like removal of army officers from BDR, participation in UN peace keeping mission, appointment of superior authority through BCS examination and other demands, which indicates their involvement in the criminal conspiracy to overthrow the army officers from the BDR.
  2. that since common intention and common object are overlapped each other and have become one and same, both Sections 34 & 149 of the penal Code are applicable in the instant case.
  3. that since the convicts have implicated themselves in the offences by making inculpatory 164 statements, the same may be accepted as evidence against the co-accused as per Section 3 of the Evidence Act, 1872.
  1. that the prosecution has proved the case against the convicts/accused by adducing sufficient legal, medical and circumstantial evidence.
  2. that the criminal conspiracy, common intention and common object may be inferred from the conducts and behaviours of the convicts/accused they played at, before and after the commission of offences and they may also be proved even by the circumstantial evidence and the prosecution has been able to prove the same by adducing reliable and satisfactory evidence before the court and as such, there is no illegality in convicting and sentencing the convicts by the learned trial judge and the accused who were acquitted may also be convicted and sentenced by this court.
  1. that the convicts/accused may be convicted and sentenced solely on the basis of 164 statements as those were recorded in compliance with the provisions of Section 164 and 364 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
  2. that leaflets distributed by the BDR rebels before commission of murder and other offences at Pilkhana may be used as evidence against the BDR rebels as per Section 10 of the Evidence Act, 1872.

VIII.that the BDR rebels were engaged in criminal conspiracy in order to eliminate the

army officers from the BDR and the aforesaid fact of conspiracy is very much apparent from the evidence of PW 343 Reporter Sultanul Mohakkani Babu @ SM Babu (ATN Bangla), PW 575 Barrister Mr. Fazle Noor Tapash MP, PW 345 Sheik Fazlul Karim Salim MP, PW 337 Public Md Shamsuzzaman @ Anu, PW 338 Public KM Kamrul Ahsan Sah @ Sapon, PW 576 Public Miraj Ahmed Razib, the confessional statements of Sepoy Selim Reza, Sepoy Zakaria Mollah and Sepoy Habibur Rahman and others and the leaflets produced before the trial court by PW 624 BA-6612 Major Md. Nuruzzaman Sheikh.

Mr. Mosharraf Hossain Kazol, the Government prosecutor acted as Additional Attorney-General along with Mr. Monjur Mohammad Shahnewaz, the learned Assistant Attorney-General, in support of his submissions, has referred to the following legal decisions. 4 BLD (AD) 324, 36 DLR (AD) 234, 4 BLD (HCD) 257, 29 DLR (SC) 246 Hazrat Ali and others Vs. The State, 7 BLD(AD) 248 Ibrahim Mollah and others Vs. The State, 8 BLD(AD) 101 Amar Kumar Thakur and others Vs. The State, Md. Chan Mia alias Chand Miah Vs. The State, 9 BLD (AD) 155, AIR 1945 (PC) 118, AIR 1955 (SC) 216, 15 DLR (SC) 65, 29 DLR (SC) 246, 8 BLD (AD) 157, S. K. Baharul Islam Vs. The State, 11 BLD (HCD) 158, AIR 1955 (Patna)161 (169), PLD 1979 (Karachi)72, Anil Krishna Somaddar and others Vs. The State 1 BLD (HCD) 401, AIR 1956 (SC) 181, AIR 1959 (SC) 572, 22 DLR 620, 1954 Cr. L. J. 507, Ali Akbar Khan and others Vs. The State 2 BLD (HCD) 170, AIR

Arguments submitted by the learned Advocates for the condemned prisioners and convict-appellants.

The learned Advocates for the condemned prisoners/convicts/accused namely Mr. Khandker Mahbub Hossen, Mr. Jamiruddin Sircar, Mr. Abdul Baset Majubder, Mr. Md. Mohsen Rashid, Mr. S.M. Shahjahan, Mr. A.S.M Abdul Mobin, Mr. Syed Mizanur RAhman, Mr. Md. Aminul Islam, Mrs. Sultana Akter Rubi, Mr. Shameem Sarder, Barrister Jyotirmoy Barua and other Advocates submit as under:-

  1. that there is no legal evidence to maintain the conviction and sentence against the convicts.
  2. that the confessional statements are not true and voluntary since those were taken from them out of physical torture, coercion, threat and duress and in not complying with the provisions of Sections 164 and 364 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
  3. that there is no corroborative evidence on record to maintain the conviction and sentence against the convicts.
  4. that the convicts were not identified in dock as per Section 9 of the Evidence Act, 1872.
  5. that there are many convicts bearing the same name and as such, identification in dock was greatly needed but the prosecution has failed to do the same.
  1. that the investigation was not properly done and the same appears to be perfunctory in nature.
  2. that the confessional statement of one accused cannot be used as evidence against other co-accused as per Section 10 of the Evidence Act, 1872.

VIII. that charge both under Sections 34 and 149

of the penal code can’t be framed together against the accused/convicts.

  1. that the statements given by the convicts/accused at the time of examining them under Section 342 of the Code of Criminal Procedure were not properly considered.
  1. that the charge framed against the accused is defective and not sustainable in the eye of law.
  2. that the post-mortem reports do not appear to be compatible with the prosecution story.

The learned Advocates for the condemned prisoners/ convict-appellants, in support of their submissions, have referred decisions in the cases of Rustum and others-Vs-The State 14 BLT(HCD) (2006) 435, Ishwar Sing-Vs-State of Uttar Prodesh, Ilam Sing and others-Vs-Uttar Prodesh AIR 1976 (SC) 2423, Alla China Apparao and others-Vs-State A.P 2003 (SCC)(Cri) 87, Shamsu Nahar @ Maina-Vs-The State 4 BLD (1984) (AD)206, The State-Vs-Paran Chandra Baroy 6 BCR (AD) 225, Ruhul Amin Khan-Vs- State 56 DLR (2004)632, The State-Vs- Azahar Gazi and others 23 DLR 32, Hakim Ali and others –Vs-The Crown 6 DLR 171, Chotto Abu-Vs-The State 12 DLR 392, Moosa Abdul Rahman and another-Vs-State of Karala, 1982 Cr.L.J 2087, Chandro Sharkhar Bind and others-Vs-The State of Bihar Crl. L.J.4693, Sukhdeb Sing-Vs-The State of Panjab Crl. L.J.1988 HCD, Patna, Shahadat Hossain and others-Vs-The State 39 DLR (1987)73, Ratan Kha-Vs-The State 40 DLR (HCD)186, Lejzor Teper-Vs-The Queen 6 DLR (Privy Council)604, The State-Vs-Kanchan Sing AIR 1954 All 153, The State-Vs-Babul Mia 63DLR (AD) (2011)10, Alauddin Khan Pathan and others-Vs-The State 19 DLR (HCD)74, The State-Vs-Manik Bala (HCD)435, The State-Vs-Ali Kabria 43 DLR (HCD) 512, Safar Ali and others-Vs-The State, 36DLR (HCD)320, The State-Vs-Mafizuddin and others, 15BLT(AD)104, The State-Vs-Lieutenant Colonel Syed Farook Rahman 53 DLR 287, Zahid

Hossain@Paltu and others-Vs-State 55 DLR 160, Rezaul Karim (Md.) alias Rezaul Alam Rickshawa- Vs-State 55 DLR 382, Jafor and another-Vs-The State 14 BLD (1994)280, Habibur Rahman and others-Vs- The State 18 MLR(AD)(2013)109, Muslim Uddin and others-Vs-The State 38 DLR (AD)(1986)311, Kazi Mahbubuddin Ahmed-Vs-State 57 DLR 2205 (HCD) 512, Fazlul Huq-Vs-The State 11DLR163, PLD 1959 Dacca 931, Nur Hossain-Vs-The State 31DLR405, Trilokya Nath Das-Vs-Kenaram Das 61 C.L.J.551, Vigian Rajan-Vs-The State of Kerala AIR 1999(SC) 1086, Kehar Sing-Vs-The State AIR 1988(SC)1883, Jobaida Rashid-Vs-The State 49 DLR(1997)373, Emperor of India-Vs-Abani Bhusan Chakrabarty 15 CWN 25, Mirza Akbor –Vs-King Emperor, AIR 1940 (P.C)176, Moqbul Hossain-Vs-The State, 12 DLR SC 217, State of Tamil Nadu-Vs-Nalini AIR SC (1999) 2641, Bhuboni Shah-Vs-The King AIR 1949 P.C. 257, The State of Tamil Nadu-Vs-Nalini AIR SC (1999) 2691, Addus Sattar and others-Vs-The State, 14 BLD (AD) (1994)133 and 44 DLR (AD)(1992) 233, Altaf Hossain-Vs-State 50 DLR (AD) (1998)120, State-Vs- Ayub Ali Sardar and another 23 BLD (HCD) (2003) 181, Nawab Ali-Vs-State of Uttar Pradesh, 4 SCC (1974)600, Sydul Haque–Vs-Abul Kashem, 38 DLR (HCD)17, Dharma Pal and others-Vs-State of Haryana, AIR (1978) SC 1492, Khondkar Md. Moniruzzaman-Vs-The State, 14BLD (HCD)308, AIR 1968(SC) 829, Abdur Gafur-Vs-State 20 BLD(AD) 90, Mahabub Alam and others-Vs-State 15 BLD (AD)(1995)54, The State-Vs-Monjur 15 BLD (HCD) (1995)193, 4 BLD (AD) 206 Shamsun Nahar @ Maina Vs. The State, 6 BCR (AD) 225, 59 DLR (HCD) 653 State Vs. Al Hasib Bin Jamal, 14 BLT

Ayub Ali Sardar & another, 4 SCC (1974) 600, 38 DLR (HCD) 17, AIR (1962) All. 272, AIR (1978) SC 1492, AIR (1987) SC 826, Cr. L.J. 3519 (SC), AIR 1989 (SC) 1593, 16 DLR (HCD) 189, 54 DLR (HCD) 221 Mofizul Islam Vs. State, 46 DLR (AD) 241 State Vs. Ashraf Ali, 14 BLT (AD) 33, 45 DLR (HCD) 267 State Vs. Giasuddin, AIR 1957 (SC) 469, BLD (AD) 90, PLD 1954 Lah. 127 Muhammad Hussain Qureshi Vs. The Crown, 14 BLT (HCD) 502, 30 DLR (HCD) 401 Sadeq Ali Vs. State, 41 DLR (HCD) 349, 42 DLR (HCD) 511 Ashrafuddin Vs. State, 15 BLD (HCD) 193 The State Vs. Manjur, 6 DLR (HCD) 106, 15 BLD (AD) 54 Nowabul Alam and others Vs. The State, 1986 BLD (AD) 1, BCR 1985 (HCD) 164, 18 BLT (AD) 2010 (Bangabandhu Murder Case), 1998 P.Cr. L.J. 35, 1994 SCMR 749, PLD 1955 Federal Court 79, 58 DLR (AD) 60 State Vs. Wasikur Rahman, 51 DLR (HCD) 439 Moktar Ali Bepari Vs. State, 40 DLR (AD) 286 Mafizuddin Vs. The State, 13 MLR (AD) 302 Khandker Zillul Bari & another Vs. The State, 14 BLC (AD) 01 Ruhul Amin Vs. Mahaluxmi Bank.

Evidence with regard to development of conspiracy to eliminate the army officers from the BDR following dissatisfactions of BDR members.

It may be mentioned that before the revolt at Pilkhana on 25 and 26 February, 2009, the grievances and dissatisfactions of the BDR soldiers arising out of non-fulfilment of their demands were actually started in 1991. On 1st December 1991, five hand written leaflets were recovered from the different places of 1 Rifle Battalion, Naogaon. After recovery of the same, the aforesaid leaflets were handed over to the Commanding Officer (CO) BSS-1162 Major Khairul Alam. Subsequently an inquiry was held in order to find out the BDR members who were involved in publishing and distributing the leaflets in different places of 1 Rifle Battalion, Naogaon. It may be added that on 30 November 1991 at around 2200 hours, there was an arrangement of Tattoo Show at the Headquarters of Bangladesh Rifles at Pilkhana, Dhaka. In that programme 17 BDR soldiers of 1 Rifle Battalion, Naogaon participated and after completion of Tattoo Show, the aforesaid BDR soldiers returned to their own Battalion at 1 Rifle Battalion, Naogaon. The Commanding Officer (CO) Major Khairul Alam doubted that the BDR soldiers who came from Dhaka after participating in Tattoo Show had been involved in the activities of publishing and distributing of leaflets. From that apprehension of mind, the Commanding Officer (CO) made an arrangement for

to Sector Headquarters, Rajshahi, the BDR soldiers of

1 Rifle Battalion, Naogaon in spite of being members

of discipline force taking bamboo sticks and woods in

their hands assembled at the training ground and

chanted various types of slogans such as ÒwewWAvi ‰mwbK

GK nIÓ ÒAvgv‡`i `vex gvb‡Z n‡eÓ Ò‡mbv Awdmvi †dir bvIÓ ÒMvwoi PvKv Nyi‡e bvÓ ÒˆmwbK ‰mwbK fvB fvBÓ, Ò†eZ‡bi mgZv PvBÓ Òbv‡qK AvdRvj‡K †m±‡i †h‡Z †`Iqv n‡e bvÓ and obstructed the escort party from taking Naik Afzal to

Sector Headquarters, Rajshahi violating Section 10A (1) of the Bangladesh Rifles order,1972. Hearing a hue and cry of the BDR soldiers, the Commanding Officer

(CO) Major Khairul Alam went to the training ground

in order to know the reasons of such shouting,

excitement and aggressive attitude of the BDR

soldiers and tried to appease them. The BDR soldiers

without paying any heed to the speeches of the

Commanding Officer (CO) divided into different groups, raised objectionable slogans, started for the Battalion rest house, residences of Deputy Commanding Officer and Medical Officer shouting and making a hue and cry, scolded the Commanding Officer (CO) with objectionable and obscene languages and tried to beat him. At that time Commanding Officer (CO) of 35 Rifle Battalion Major Monis Deowan was present in the rest house as guest. The unruly BDR soldiers encircled Major

Monis Deowan at the rest house and scolded him with indecent and vulgar languages and damaged useable materials kept at the bed room. The BDR soldiers also attacked the residences of two officers and called the bad names of the officers and their family members in objectionable, obnoxious and repulsive languages. At the unbecoming activities and behaviour of the arrogant BDR soldiers the officers out of fear of life went to the residence of superintendent of police and then made contact with the Sector Commander remaining therein. Subsequently they came back to their own unit getting instruction from the Sector Commander, Rajshahi when the situation became normal. In the meantime the BDR soldiers made a false pretext that in order to suppress the BDR revolt, the officers called army soldiers from Bogura Cantonment. On that plea, some BDR soldiers from the training ground participated with the unruly BDR soldiers. Then they went to the quarter guard, tried to break open the Kote and loot the arms and ammunitions. However, the breaking of Kote was saved from the hands of excited and indiscipline BDR soldiers at the interference of DAD Wahed and others as a result of which the Sector Commander and Unit

The five leaflets were produced before the trial court by PW 624 BA-6612 Major Md. Nuruzzaman

Sheikh and same were exhibited as exhibit-1131

series.

The contents of the leaflets were as follows:-    

19 `dv gvb‡Z n‡e|

GgwU fvq Mvox Pvjv‡e bv|

Avgx©i mvg‡b we.wW.Avi evwnwb Pj‡e bv|

GjvKv Qvo GjvKv Qvo Avgx©i Awdmvi we.wW.Avi GjvKv Qvo

bq Av¸b Rj‡e we.wW.Avi fvq GK nI|

19 `dv gvb‡Z n‡e bv gvbv ch©šÍ we.wW.Avi fvq mKj KvR eÜ Ki| Avgx©i Awdmvi‡K †Kvb mbgvb †`‡e bv|

3 w`‡bi g‡a¨ we.wW.Avi Awdmv‡ii wbKU `vqxZ¡ eywSqv `vI| we.wW.Avi fvq GK nI|

Avgv‡`i `vex gvb‡Z n‡e| bq Av¸b Rj‡e|

Mvoxi PvKv Nyi‡e bv|

19 `dv gvb‡Z n‡e|

we.wW.Avi fvq GK nI|

GKevi hLb †b‡gwQ (i³) w`‡q joe|

19 `dv gvb‡Z n‡e| Avgv‡`i `vex gvb‡Z n‡e| bq‡j msMÖvg Pj‡e|

GK evi hLb †b‡gwQ (i³) w`‡q joe|

we.wW.Avi fvq GK nI| 1| 19 `dv gvb‡Z n‡e|

2| Aviwgi Awdmvi we.wW.Avi GjvKv Qvo|

bq Av¸b Rj‡e Mvox hw` P‡j Zvi Dci nvgjv Pj‡e| we.wW.Avi fvq GK nI|

The inquiry report with opinions and recommendations of the court of inquiry (C of I) constituted on 30 December 1991 was produced before the trial court by the PW 624 BA-6612 Major Md. Nuruzzaman Sheikh and same was exhibited as exhibit-1131 series.

The contents of the inquiry report were as under:-

Av`vjZ KZ©„K D`NvwUZ Z_¨vejx

1|  30 b‡f¤^i 91 Bs ivZ AvbygvwbK 2200 NwUKvq m`i `dZi

evsjv‡`k ivB‡djm&, XvKvq AbywôZ wWªj cÖwZ‡hvwMZvq Ask M nÖ b †k‡l 1 ivB‡dj e¨vUvwjqb, bIMuv Gi 17 Rb ‰mwbK e¨vUvwjq‡ cÖZ¨vMgb K‡i|

2| 01 wW‡m¤^i Ô91 Bs ZvwiL mKv‡j wcwUÕi mgq e¨vUvwjq‡bi wewfbœ ¯ v’ b †_‡K †hgb- Awd‡mi c~e© w`K, cv¤ú qvD‡mi c~e© w`K,

†Uªwbs †k‡Wi c~e© w`K, Dc-AwabvqK I †gwWK¨vj Awdmv‡ii evmfe‡bi †cQb w`‡K GKwU K‡i †gvU 5wU (msêbx ÔKÕ-AvB †¯‹P)

nv‡Z wjLv cÖPvicÎ (Leaflet) D×vi Kiv nq (msêbx ÔLÕ-cÖPvicÎ

mg~n) Ges e¨vUvwjqb AwabvqK weGmGm-1162 †gRi Lvqi“j Avj‡gi wbKU n¯ÍvšÍi Kiv nq|

3| e¨vUvwjqb AwabvqK †gRi Avjg NUbvwU †m±i AwabvqK K‡b©j GmGg Rvnv½xi, wcGmwm †K AewnZ Ki‡j †m±i AwabvqK Zuv‡K (‡gRi Avjg) †K ev Kviv H cÖPvicÎ ¸‡jv wj‡L‡Q Ges BDwb‡Ui wewfbœ ¯’v‡b jvwM‡q‡Q Zv D˜NvU‡bi †Póv Kivi wb‡`©k †`b|

4| AwabvqK †gRi Avjg XvKv †_‡K m`¨ cÖZ¨vMZ wWªj cvwU©i m`m¨‡`i GB Kg©Kv‡Û RwoZ m‡›`‡n cvwU©i 17 Rb m`‡m¨i nv‡Zi

wjLv cix¶vi e¨e¯ v’ K‡ib Ges Zv‡`i ga¨ †_‡K 26238 bv‡qK

AvdRvj †nv‡m‡bi nv‡Zi ms‡½ cÖPvi c‡Îi wjLvi wgj LuyR ‡cvb| (msêbx ÔMÕ- bv‡qK AvdRv‡ji nv‡Zi wjLv)

5| AwabvqK †gRi Avjg wRÁvmvev‡`i gva¨‡g NUbvi ms‡½ RwoZ e¨vw³‡`i mbv³ Kiv Z_v msNwUZ Kg©Kv‡Ûi g~j Drm Luy‡R †ei Kivi j‡¶¨ bv‡qK AvdRvj‡K †m±i m`i `ßi ivRkvnx‡Z

†bIqvi Rb¨ †m±i Awabvq‡Ki wbKU mycvwik K‡ib|

6| ‡m±i AwabvqK evsjv‡`k ivB‡djm& m`i `߇ii cwiPvjK, cÖ‡qvM I cÖwk¶b K‡b©j mvgmy¾vnvb wcGmwm Gi ms‡½ civgk©µ‡g bv‡qK AvdRvj‡K Av‡iv wRÁvmvev‡`i Rb¨ †m±i m`i ivRkvnx‡Z cvVv‡bvi wb‡`©k †`b|

7| wb‡`k©vbymv‡i e¨vUvwjqb AwabvqK †gRi Avjg h_vh_ ÔGmKU©Õ Gi gva¨‡g Hw`b A_©vr 01 wW‡m¤^i 91Bs we‡K‡ji g‡a¨B bv‡qK AvdRvj‡K †m±i m`i, ivRkvnx‡Z cvVv‡bvi Rb¨ e¨vUvwjqb my‡e`vi †gRi‡K cÖ‡qvRbxq wb‡`©k cÖ`vb K‡ib|

8| 01 wW‡m¤^i AvbygvwbK †ejv 1730 NwUKvi mgq ÔGmKUÕ cvwU© hLb bv‡qK AvdRvj‡K wb‡q ˆmwbK e¨vivK †_‡K wb‡P bvgwQj, wVK

ZLb wKQz msL¨K ‰mwbK Dk„•Lj I D‡ËwRZ Ae¯ v’ q euv‡ki jwV v, KvV

BZ¨vw` nv‡Z wewfbœ †k v¬ Mvb †hgb, ÒwewWAvi ‰mwbK GK nIÓ ÒAvgv‡`i `vex gvb‡Z n‡eÓ Ò‡mbv Awdmvi †dir bvIÓ ÒMvwoi PvKv

Nyi‡e bvÓ ÒˆmwbK ‰mwbK fvB fvBÓ, Ò†eZ‡bi mgZv PvBÓ Òbv‡qK AvdRvj‡K †m±‡i †h‡Z †`Iqv n‡e bvÓ BZ¨vw` mn ˆn ‰P I wPrKvi

K‡i gvigyLx iƒ‡c cÖwk¶b gv‡V GKwÎZ nq|

9| AwabvqK †gRi Avjg wbR evmfeb †_‡K ˆmwbK‡`i ˆn ‰P I

wPrKvi ï‡b ev¯Íe NUbv Rvbvi Rb¨ cÖwk¶b gv‡Vi D‡ËwRZ I gvigyLx ‰mwbK‡`i gv‡S Dcw¯ Z’ nb Ges Zv‡`i‡K wewfbœ fv‡e eywS‡q

kvšÍ Kivi †Póv K‡ib|

10| Dk„•Lj I D‡ËwRZ ˆmwbKMb Awabvq‡Ki K_vq Kb©cvZ bv

K‡i wewfbœ `‡j wef³ n‡q gvigyLx i“c avib K‡i AvcwËKi

†k v¬ Mvb, ˆn ‰P I wPrKvi Ki‡Z Ki‡Z e¨vUvwjqb Ò†ió nvDmÓ, Dc-

AwabvqK I †gwWK¨vj Awdmv‡ii evmfe‡bi w`‡K Qz‡U hvq| Zviv AwabvqK †gRi Avjg‡KI AK_¨ I Ak x¬ j fvlvq MvwjMvjvR K‡i

Ges cÖnv‡ii †Póv K‡i|

11| 02 wW‡m¤^i 91Bs Zvwi‡L ivRkvnx K¨v‡WU K‡jR ÒG· K¨v‡WUÓ c~Ytwgjbx Drm‡e †hvMv`v‡bi Rb¨ AvMZ 35 ivB‡dj e¨vUvwjq‡bi AwabvqK †gRi gbxl †`Iqvb H mgq e¨vUvwjqb †ió

nvD‡m Ae¯ v’ b KiwQ‡jb| D‡j¬L¨ †h †gRi gbxl †`Iqvb †gRi

Avj‡gi †Kvm©‡gU Ges GKB K¨v‡WU K‡j‡Ri ÒG· K¨v‡WUÓ| D‡ZwRZ I gvigyLx ‰mwb‡Ki GKwU `j Ò†ió nvD‡mÓ †gRi gbxl †`Iqvb‡K wN‡i †d‡j Zv‡K AK_¨ I Ak x¬ j fvlvq MvwjMvjvR K‡i

Ges Zvi kqb K‡¶ iw¶Z e¨envh© wRwbm c‡Îi ¶wZmvab K‡i|

12| †gRi gbxl NUbvi AvKw¯gKZvq nZwenej n‡q c‡ob Ges µgvebwZkxj cwiw¯ w’ Z wbqš¿‡b Zuvi n¯Í‡¶c ïfdj e‡q Avb‡ebv

†f‡e BDwbU Ò‡ió nvDmÓ Z¨vM K‡i mgMÖ NUbv †m±i AwabvqK†K Rvbv‡bvi D‡Ï‡k¨ Zuvi c~e©cwiwPZ bIMuvÕi †Rjv cÖkvmK wgt D K¨ †Rb Gi ms‡M bIMuv mvwK©U nvD‡m †hvMv‡hvM K‡ib| H mgq m wK U© nvD‡m R‰bK gš¿x Ae¯ v’ b KiwQ‡jb|

13| Ò‡ió nvDm †_‡K D‡ËwRZ ˆmwbKMb e¨vUvwjqb Dc-AwabvqK †gRi Aveyj Kvjvg AvRv` Ges ‡gwWK¨vj Awdmvi K¨v‡Þb gy¯ÍvwdRyi

ingv‡bi evmvq nvgjv K‡i| Zviv AwdmviØq Ges Zv‡`i cwiev‡ii

m`m¨‡`i Ak x¬ j fvlvq MvwjMvjvR K‡i, Dc-Awabvq‡Ki †Uwj‡dvb

†mU †f‡½ †d‡j, GKwU IqvwK UwK †mU wQwb‡q †bq Ges evm fe‡bi

`iRv fv½vi †Póv K‡i|

14| Dc-AwabvqK †gRi Aveyj Kvjvg AvRv`, whwb gvÎ `y-v gm c~‡e© e¨vUvwjq‡b †hvM`vb K‡ib, g¨v‡jwiqv R¡‡i AvµvšÍ Ae¯ v’ q Gm, AvB,

wKD (SIQ) wQ‡jb| wZwb I †gwWK¨vj Awdmvi K¨v‡Þb gy¯ÍvwdRyi ingvb D‡ËwRZ I gvigyLx ˆmwbK‡`i AvµgbvZ Kœ nvgjv, e¨vUvwjqb Awabvq‡Ki ms‡½ †hvMv‡hvMnxbZv Ges Awabvq‡Ki cwibwZ m¤^‡Ü A¯^”Q avibvq nZwenej n‡q c‡ob|

15| ÒwmI k¨vlÓ ÒnvwZqvi AvbÓ, ÒG‡`iI †kl KwiÓ, †KvqvU v© i MvW© GjvKv †_‡K µgvMZ cvMjv N›Uvi AvIqvR Ges me©cwi cici wZbwU ¸wji kã (hv ¸wji bq cUKvi kã wQj) ï‡b Dfq Awdmvi

mgMÖ cwiw¯ w’ Z †m±i AwabvqK‡K Rvbv‡bvi D‡Ï‡k¨ wbR wbR evmfeb Z¨vM K‡i cvk©e¦ Z©x b`x cvi n‡q †Rjv cywjk mycv‡ii evmvq hvb Ges

†m±i Awabvq‡Ki ms‡½ †emvgwiK †Uwj‡dv‡b †hvMv‡hvM K‡ib| †m±i Awabvq‡Ki wbKU †_‡K cwiw¯ w’ Z kvšÍ †R‡b Ges ZuviB wb‡`©‡k Dfq Awdmvi BDwb‡U wd‡i Av‡mb Ges Awabvq‡Ki ms‡½ Zuvi evmvq mv¶vZ K‡ib Ges we¯ÍvwiZ AewnZ nb|

16| Dc-AwabvqK I †gwWK¨vj Awdmv‡ii evmv †_‡K Dk„•Lj I D‡ËwRZ ˆmwbKMb †KvqvUv©i Mv‡W©i w`‡K hvq| cÖwk¶b gvV †_‡KI wKQz Dk„•Lj ˆmwbK, Zv‡`i ms‡½ †hvM ‡`q| †KvqvUvi Mv‡W© hvIqvi

c‡_ Zviv BDwb‡Ui mKj †Uwj‡dvb jvBb wew”Qbœ K‡i Ges †hvMv‡hvM

e¨e¯ v’ e¨vnZ K‡i| †gRi gbxl ‡`Iqvb wek„„•Ljv `g‡bi Rb¨ e¸ov

†mbvwbevm †_‡K †mbv`j Zje K‡i‡Qb Ges H †mbv`j wkNªB Zv‡`i †gvKvwejvi Rb¨ Avm‡Q GB ARynv‡Z Zviv Ô†KvZÕ †f‡½ A¯¿ †ei Kivi †Póv K‡i| AwabvqK †gRi Avjg Ges wb‡qvMavix wewfbœ

c`exi Awdmvi/‰mwbK e„›` †hgb wWGwW Iqv‡n`, my‡e`vi g †Ri †gRevDj Bmjvg, nvwej`vi †gRi wjqvKZ, wWDwU †RwmI †`jIqvi

†nv‡mb, †KvqvU v© i gv÷vi nvwej`vi Avãyj nvB, ÔAviwc GbwmIÕ bv‡qK AvwRR cÖgyL e¨vw³eM© D‡ËwRZ I Dk„•Lj ‰mwbK‡`i kvšÍ Ki‡Z mg_© nb Ges ‡kl ch©šÍ †KvqvU©vi Mv‡W©i Ô†KvZÕ fv½v †_‡K †invB cvq|

17| Dk„•Lj ˆmwbK‡`i cÖavb `vex wQj bv‡qK AvdRvj‡K †m±i

m`i `ßi ivRkvnx‡Z †h‡Z bv †`Iqv| e¨vUvwjqb AwabvqK †gRi

Avjg BDwb‡Ui †Uwj‡dvb jvBb bó _vKvq wKQymsL¨K ˆmwbK cwie¨vß

n‡q kn‡ii †Kvb GK †emvgwiK †Uwj‡dv‡b †m±i Awabvq‡Ki ms‡½ Avjvc K‡ib Ges cwiw¯ w’ Z e¨vL¨v K‡i bv‡qK AvdRvj‡K H iv‡Z A_©vr 01 wW‡m¤^i 91Bs Zvwi‡L ivRkvnx bv cvVv‡bvi AbygwZ MÖnb

K‡ib|

18| D‡ËRbv I wek„•Lj cwiw¯ w’ Z PjvKv‡j †Kvb GK mgq wKQzmsL¨K ˆmwbK wWGwW Iqvwn`‡K Kuv‡a Zz‡j Dj v¬ m K‡i Ges wZwb (wWGwW Iqvwn`)‡K Zv‡`i bZzb AwabvqK e‡j †Nvlbv K‡i| wWGwW Iqvwn` ˆmwbK‡`i G Kv‡R evav cÖ`vb K‡ib Ges weeªZ Ae¯ v’ q Zuv‡K

†invB †`Iqvi R‡b¨ ˆmwbK‡`i evi evi Aby‡iva Rvbvb|

19| ivwÎ cÖvq 2130 NwUKvi mgq cwiw¯ w’ Z kvšÍ n‡q Av‡m Ges mKj ˆmwbK e¨viv‡K wd‡i hvq| AwabvqK †gRi Avjg †Uwj‡dvb

jvBb c~btcÖwZwôZ K‡i †m±i AwabvqK‡K we¯ÍvwiZ AewnZ K‡ib|

20| c‡ii w`b A_©vr 02 wW‡m¤^i 91Bs Zvwi‡L †m±i AwabvqK e¨vUvwjq‡b hvb Ges `ievi MÖnb K‡ib| Dcw¯ Z’ mKj ¯Í‡ii ˆmwbK e„›` K…ZK‡g©i Rb¨ AbyZß nq Ges KZ©…c‡¶i AbyK¤úv cÖv_ K ©bv‡i| †m±i AwabvqK ivRkvnx †divi mgq bvqK AvdRvj‡K ms‡½ wb‡q

hvb|

21| bv‡qK AvdRvj †m±i m`i `߇i Db¥y³ Ae¯ v’ q bRi e›`x

Av‡Q|

22| bv‡qK AvdRv‡ji nv‡Zi wjLvi ms‡½ cÖPvi c‡Îi wjLvi h‡_ó

wgj Lyu‡R cvIqv hvq| we‡kl K‡i Òi³Ó I ÒfvBÓ kã `ywUe ivb vb

†hfv‡e ÒiµÓ I ÒfvqÓ wnmv‡e cÖPvi c‡Î wjLv n‡q‡Q Zv †_‡K Gi

cÖgvb cvIqv hvq|

23| NUbvi w`b A_©vr 01 wW‡m¤^i 91 Bs Zvwi‡Li AevwÂZ I AcÖxwZKi cwiw¯’wZ m„wó‡Z wbgè ewY©Z ˆmwbKMb AZ¨šÍ DM Ö,Dk„•Lj I RNb¨ f~wgKv cvjb K‡iwQj|

K| 40959 wmcvnx †gvt AvwRRyi ingvb 1 ivBt e¨vUvt

L| 48659 wmcvnx nvwdRyi ingvb  1 ivBt e¨vUvt

M| 49887 wmcvnx †Mvjvg †nv‡mb  1 ivBt e¨vUvt

N| 44145 wmcvnx Rwgi Avjx 1 ivBt e¨vUvt

O| 40982 wmcvnx eveyj Av³vi wgTv  1 ivBt e¨vUvt

P|  47261 wmcvnx ûgvqyb Kwei   1 ivBt e¨vUvt Q|  51329 wmcvnx Bg`v`yj nK   1 ivBt e¨vUvt

R|  46452 wmcvnx we`y¨r Kzgvi gvivd  1 ivBt e¨vUvt S|  52981 wmcvnx Iqvwn`yj Bmjvg  1 ivBt e¨vUvt T|  23809 nvwej`vi nv‡kg Lvb   1 ivBt e¨vUvt

U|  25263 bv‡qK gxi gvmy`  1 ivBt e¨vUvt

V|  44106 wmcvnx 濫ybv_ `vm  20 ivBt e¨vUvt W|  45221 wmcvnx †mvjvqgvb mi`vi  20 ivBt e¨vUvt X|  46300 wmcvnx Avãyi ingvb   20 ivBt e¨vUvt Y|  50239 wmcvnx Avãyj gv‡jK   20 ivBt e¨vUvt Z|  47097 wmcvnx kvnRvnvb Avjx  31 ivBt e¨vUvt _|  47855 wmcvnx †iRvDj Kwig  31 ivBt e¨vUvt

`|  45529 wmcvnx bvwRg DwÏb   31 ivBt e¨vUvt a|  52774 wmcvnx Avjx Bmjvg   31 ivBt e¨vUvt b|  53547 wmcvnx Aveyj Kvjvg AvRv`  31 ivBt e¨vUvt Av`vj‡Zi gZvgZt-

1| 01 wW‡m¤^i 91Bs ZvwiL mKv‡j 1 ivB‡dj e¨vUvwjqb, bIMuv

Gi BDwbU GjvKvi wewfbœ ¯’v‡b AvcwËKi e³e¨ m¤^wjZ †h cuvPwU cÖPvicÎ cvIqv hvq Zv BDwb‡UiB †Kvb ˆmwb‡Ki GKB nv‡Zi wjLv|

2| evsjv‡`k ivB‡djm, m`i `ßi, wcjLvbv, XvKv †_‡K cÖZ¨vMZ

e¨vUvwjqb wWªj cvwU©i m`m¨ bs-26238 bv‡qK †gvt AvdRvj †nv‡m‡bi nv‡Zi wjLvi ms‡½ cÖPvi c‡Îi wjLvi h‡_ó wgj Ges

Av`vj‡Z cÖ`Ë e³e¨ †_‡K DrNvwUZ Z_¨vw` †_‡K cÖgvwbZ nq †h

cÖPvi cÎ ¸wj bv‡qK AvdRv‡jiB nv‡Zi wjLv|

3| bs-26238 bv‡qK AvdRvj‡K †m±i m`i `ßi, ivRkvnx‡Z

Av‡iv wRÁvmvev‡`i D‡Ï‡k¨ †bIqv‡K Dcj¶ K‡i 01 wW‡m¤^i 91Bs

ZvwiL we‡Kj 1730 NwUKv †_‡K ivZ 2130 NwUKv ch©šÍ BDwb‡U Abwf‡cÖZ, AevwÂZ I D‡ËRbvKi cwiw¯ w’ Z m„wó Z_v BDwb U AwabvqKmn Ab¨vb¨ Kg©KZ©ve„‡›`i ms‡½ Akvjxb I Dk„•Lj AvPi‡bi

gva¨‡g †h †eAvBbx I k„•Ljv cwicwš’ Kg©KvÛ msNwUZ Kiv nq Zvi

Rb¨ g~jZ wb¤è ewY©Z e¨w³eM© `vqx t

K| 40959 wmcvnx †gvt AvwRRyi ingvb 1 ivBt e¨vUvt

L| 48659 wmcvnx nvwdRyi ingvb  1 ivBt e¨vUvt

M|  49887 wmcvnx †Mvjvg †nv‡mb  1 ivBt e¨vUvt N|  44145 wmcvnx Rwgi Avjx   1 ivBt e¨vUvt O|  40982 wmcvnx eveyj Av³vi wgTv  1 ivBt e¨vUvt P|  47261 wmcvnx ûgvqyb Kwei   1 ivBt e¨vUvt Q|  51329 wmcvnx Bg`v`yj nK   1 ivBt e¨vUvt

R|  46452 wmcvnx we`y¨r Kzgvi gvivd  1 ivBt e¨vUvt S|  52981 wmcvnx Iqvwn`yj Bmjvg  1 ivBt e¨vUvt T|  23809 nvwej`vi nv‡kg Lvb   1 ivBt e¨vUvt

U|  25263 bv‡qK gxi gvmy`  1 ivBt e¨vUvt

V|  44106 wmcvnx 濫ybv_ `vm  20 ivBt e¨vUvt W|  45221 wmcvnx †mvjvqgvb mi`vi  20 ivBt e¨vUvt X|  46300 wmcvnx Avãyi ingvb   20 ivBt e¨vUvt Y|  50239 wmcvnx Avãyj gv‡jK   20 ivBt e¨vUvt Z|  47097 wmcvnx kvnRvnvb Avjx  31 ivBt e¨vUvt _|  47855 wmcvnx †iRvDj Kwig  31 ivBt e¨vUvt

`|  45529 wmcvnx bvwRg DwÏb   31 ivBt e¨vUvt a|  52774 wmcvnx Avjx Bmjvg   31 ivBt e¨vUvt

b| 53547 wmcvnx Aveyj Kvjvg AvRv` 31 ivBt e¨vUvt

4| D™¢~Z cwiw¯’wZ †gvKv‡ejvq e¨vUvwjqb AwabvqK weGmGm- 1162 †gRi Lvqi“j Avjg mvnwmKZv, `„pwPËZv I KZ©e¨civqbZvi

D¾j `„óvšÍ ¯’vcb K‡i‡Qb| Zuvi mg‡qvwPZ I mwVK c`‡¶c cwiw¯’wZi m¤¢ve¨ ¸i“Zi AebwZ †iv‡a mvnvh¨ K‡i‡Q|

5| Amy¯ Z’ v (g¨v‡jwiqv R¡‡ii Kvi‡b †K¬v‡ivKyBb AvB,wf Wªc PjwQj) NUbvi AvKw¯§KZv, 70/80 Rb Db¥Ë I D‡ËwRZ gvigyLx ˆmwb‡Ki AvµgbvZ¥K nvgjv, Awabvq‡Ki mv‡_ †hvMv‡hvM nxbZv Ges me©cwi Zvi (Awabvq‡Ki) cwibwZ mg¦‡Ü A¯^”Q avibv e¨vUvwjqb Dc-AwabvqK weG-2489 †gRi Aveyj Kvjvg AvRv`‡K BDwb‡Ui cwiw¯ w’ Z m¤ú‡K© AenwZ Z_v cwiw¯’wZ wbqš¿‡b †m±i Awabvq‡Ki n¯—‡¶c Kvgbvi D‡Ï‡k¨ wbR evmfeb Z¨vM K‡i wbKU¯’ †hvMv‡hvM

e¨ve¯ v’ i mÜv‡b †Rjv cywjk mycv‡ii evmvq †h‡Z DØyØ K‡w iQj|

6| ‡iwR‡g›Uvj †gwWK¨vj Awdmvi weGmGm-100570 K¨v‡Þb †gvt †gv¯ÍvwdRyi ingvb NUbvi w`b cÖ_g †_‡K †kl ch©šÍ e¨vUvwjqb Dc-AwabvqK †gRi Aveyj Kvjvg AvRv‡`i ms‡½ wQ‡jb| Zuvi mKj Kg©KvÛ †gRi Aveyj Kvjvg AvRv‡`i civgk©/wb‡`©‡kB wbqwš¿Z n‡q‡Q|

7| e¨vUvwjq‡bi ms‡½ evB‡ii †hvMv‡hvM-nxbZv Ges µgvebwZkxj

cwiw¯ w’ Z wbqš¿‡b Zvi n¯’‡¶c ïf dj e‡q Avb‡ebv †f‡e weG-

1152 †gRi gbxl †`Iqvb cwiw¯ w’ Z m¤ú‡K© †m±i AwabvqK‡K AwewnZ Kivi D‡Ï‡k¨ e¨vUvwjqb †ió nvDm Z¨vM K‡i Zuv ic~e© cwiwPZ bIMuv Gi †Rjv cÖkvm‡Ki ms‡½ †hvMv‡hvM K‡iwQ‡jb|

8| D‡ËRbvKi I wek„•Lj cwiw¯ w’ Z wbqš¿‡b e¨vUvwjqb †KvqvU©vi gvóvi Avi,wW,I-70 wWGwW †gvt Iqvwn`yj Bmjvg Avkv e¨vÂK mvov

cÖ`v‡b e¨_© n‡q‡Qb|

Av`vj‡Zi mycvwikt-

1| AvcwËKi e³e¨ m¤^wjZ cÖPvicÎ wj‡L ˆmwbK‡`i gv‡S Am‡šÍvl, we‡Øl I wek„•Ljv m„wói `v‡q †`vlx bs-26238b v‡qK †gvt

AvdRvj  †nv‡m‡bi  wei“‡×  k„•Ljvg~jK  e¨e¯ v’  (Disciplinary

Action) MÖnb Kiv ‡nvK|

2| 01 wW‡m¤^i 91Bs ZvwiL we‡Kj 1730 NwUKv †_‡K ivZ 2130 NwUKv ch©šÍ mgqKv‡j 1 ivB‡dj e¨vUvwjqb bIMuv‡Z AevwÂZ, Abwf‡cÖZ  I  D‡ËRbvKi  cwiw¯ w’ Z  m„wó,  e¨vUvwjqb  AwabvqKmn Ab¨vb¨ Kg©KZ©v‡`i ms‡½ Akvjxb I Dk„•Lj AvPib, †Uwjd ‡vb †mU fv½vmn BDwb‡Ui †Uwj‡dvb jvBb web‡ói gva¨‡g miKvix m¤úwËi ¶wZmvab  Ges  me©cwi  cÖPwjZ  AvBb  I  k„•Ljv  cwicwš’  Kg vÛ msNU‡bi `v‡q wb¤œ ewY©Z ˆmwbK e„‡›`i wei“‡× k„•Ljvg~jK e¨e¯ v’ (Disciplinary Action) MÖnb Kiv †nvK|

K|  40959 wmcvnx †gvt AvwRRyi ingvb 1 ivBt e¨vUvt

L|  48659 wmcvnx nvwdRyi ingvb  1 ivBt e¨vUvt

M|  49887 wmcvnx †Mvjvg †nv‡mb  1 ivBt e¨vUvt

N|  44145 wmcvnx Rwgi Avjx  1 ivBt e¨vUvt

O|  40982 wmcvnx eveyj Av³vi wgTv  1 ivBt e¨vUvt

P|  47261 wmcvnx ûgvqyb Kwei   1 ivBt e¨vUvt

Q|  51329 wmcvnx Bg`v`yj nK   1 ivBt e¨vUvt

R|  46452 wmcvnx we`y¨r Kzgvi gvivd  1 ivBt e¨vUvt

S|  52981 wmcvnx Iqvwn`yj Bmjvg  1 ivBt e¨vUvt

T|  23809 nvwej`vi nv‡kg Lvb   1 ivBt e¨vUvt

U|  25263 bv‡qK gxi gvmy`  1 ivBt e¨vUvt

V|  44106 wmcvnx 濫ybv_ `vm  20 ivBt e¨vUvt

W|  45221 wmcvnx †mvjvqgvb  20 ivBt e¨vUvt

X|  46300 wmcvnx Avãyi ingvb   20 ivBt e¨vUvt

Y|  50239 wmcvnx Avãyj gv‡jK   20 ivBt e¨vUvt

Z|  47097 wmcvnx kvnRvnvb Avjx  31 ivBt e¨vUvt

_|  47855 wmcvnx †iRvDj Kwig  31 ivBt e¨vUvt

`|  45529 wmcvnx bvwRg DwÏb   31 ivBt e¨vUvt

a|  52774 wmcvnx Avjx Bmjvg   31 ivBt e¨vUvt

b|  53547 wmcvnx Aveyj Kvjvg AvRv`  31 ivBt e¨vUvt

3|  mvnmx,  mwVK  I  mg‡qvwPZ  c`‡¶c  MÖn‡bi  gva¨‡g  D™¢zZ cwiw¯ w’ Z Kvh©Ki fv‡e †gvKvwejv, wbqš¿b Ges Gi m¤¢ve¨ ¸i“Zi cwibwZ †iv‡a mg_©Zvi Rb¨ e¨vUvwjqb AwabvqK weGmGm-1162 †gRi Lvqi“j Avjg‡K cÖkswmZ Kiv †nvK|

4|  e¨vUvwjqb  Dc-AwabvqK  weG-2489  †gRi  Aveyj  Kvjvg AvRv`  I  †KvqvU©vi  gvóvi  Avi,wW,I-70  wWGwW  †gvt  Iqvwn`yj Bmjvg‡K AbwZwej‡¤^ cÖkvmwbK e¨ve¯ v’  wnmv‡e Ab¨Î e`jx Kiv ‡nvK|

5| ‡Uwj‡dvb †mU I †Uwj‡dvb Zvi webó Kvix‡`i †h‡nZz wbfz©jfv‡e mbv³ Kiv m¤¢e nqwb †m‡nZz G eve` miKvix m¤úwËi

¶wZ †gvU 3000/- (wZb nvRvi) UvKv  (‡Uwj‡dvb †mU-2600/- wUG¨vÛwU KZ…K wba©vwiZ Ges †Uwj‡dvb Zvi eve` Ayg vv bwbK 400/-) ivóª KZ„ K© enb Kiv ‡nvK|

mfvcwZt

¯^v¶i A¯úó

(weG-100118 K‡Y©j gbRyi Avn‡g`

†gvj−v)

m`m¨t

1|    ¯^v¶i A¯úó        

  (weG-348 †jt K‡Y©j ‡gvt BDbym Lvb)

2|    ¯^v¶i A¯úó        

(weG-2624 †gRi  †nv‡mb †mv‡nj

kvn‡bIqvR)

3|  ¯^v¶i A¯úó

(AviwWI-54 wWGwW ‡gvt AvwRRyi ingvb)

It may be mentioned that in 1991, the BDR members were regulated by the Bangladesh Rifles Order, 1972. As per Article 4(3) of the Bangladesh Rifles Order, 1972, the BDR force shall be a discipline force within the meaning of Article 152 of the constitution of the Peoples Republic of Bangladesh. Article 10A(1) of the Bangladesh Rifles Order, 1972 contemplates as under:- A Subordinate officer or a Rifleman or a Signalman who...

(a)          begins, excites, causes or joins in any mutiny or sedition or, being present at any mutiny or sedition does not make his utmost endeavours to suppress it, or knowing, or, having reason to believe in the existence of any mutiny or sedition, does not, without delay, give information thereof to his Commanding Officer or superior officer, or

(b)         uses, or attempts to use, criminal force to, or commits an assault on, his superior officer, knowing or having reason to believe him to be such, whether on or off duty; or

(c)          abandons or delivers up any garrison, fortress, post or guard or wireless station which is committed to his charge or which it is his duty to defend; or 

(d)         in the presence of an enemy or any person in arms against whom it is his duty to act, casts away his arms or his ammunition, or intentionally uses words or any other means to induce any other subordinate officer or Rifleman or Signalman to abstain from acting against the enemy, or any such person, or to discourage any such subordinate officer or Rifleman or Signalman from acting against the enemy or such person, or who otherwise misbehaves; or

(e)          directly or indirectly holds correspondence with, or communicates intelligence to, or assists, or relieves, any enemy or person in arms against the State, or omits to discover immediately to his Commanding Officer or superior officer any such correspondence or communication coming to his Knowledge; or

(f)           directly or indirectly assists or relieves with money, victuals or ammunition, or knowingly harbours or protects any enemy or person in arms against the state; or

(g)         without authority leaves his Commanding Officers, or his post or party, to go in search or plunder, or

(h)         quits his guard, picket, party or patrol without being regularly relieved or without leave; or

(i)            uses criminal force to, or commits and assault on, any person bringing provision or other necessaries to camp or quarters, or forces a safeguard, or without authority breaks into any house or any other place for plunder, or plunders, destroys or damages any property or any kind; or

(i)            intentionally causes or spreads a false alarm in action, camp, garrison or quarters, 

shall, on conviction by the Special Court, be punished with rigorous imprisonment for a term which may extent to seven years, and shall also be liable to fine which may extend to Taka one hundred.

It is worthwhile to mention that in 1991, some unruly BDR soldiers of 1 Rifle Battalion, Naogaon published and distributed leaflets among the BDR soldiers with a view to removing the army officers from the BDR, made dissatisfaction and excitement among the BDR soldiers against the army officers making adverse comments, raised a hue and cry and assaulted the Commanding Officer (CO) and other army officers and their family members, attacked the residences of army officers and the rest house, tried to break open the Kote and loot the arms and ammunitions and damaged the government properties by which the BDR soldiers of 1 Rifle Battalion, Naogaon committed mutiny which was punishable under order 10A(1) of the Bangladesh Rifles Order, 1972.  Despite the aforesaid provisions of law, the then government in 1991 miserably failed to try the BDR soldiers who committed mutiny under order 10A(1) of the Bangladesh Rifles Order, 1972. If the

then government in 1991 would take decision to try the BDR soldiers of 1 Rifle Battalion, Naogaon under the existing law of the then time, the occurrence as to brutal killings and barbarous massacres happened on 25 and 26 February 2009 at Pilkhana would never be happened and repeated once again. It will not be out of place to mention that the Bangladesh Rifles Order, 1972 has been abrogated as soon as the Border Guard Bangladesh Ain, 2010 came into force from 10th December 2010. From the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, it is crystal clear that the BDR members in order to eliminate the army officers from the BDR started making conspiracy from 1991 and it was their initial plan and design as to conspiracy to overthrow the army officers from the BDR.

Further, the conspiracy of the BDR rebels in order to eliminate the army officers from the BDR has also been reflected in the confessional statement of No.56942 Sepoy Md. Habibur Rahman CS accused No.26 who has stated, inter alia, that on 16.10.2005 he joined in 44 Rifle Battalion at Pilkhana. One and a half years before the BDR carnage at Pilkhana, this accused happened to meet Sepoy Selim in the afternoon in front of the soldiers line. On meeting, Sepoy Selim told him about the appointment of their own officers in the BDR removing the army officers. Sepoy Selim further told him that he had talked with an advocate in that regard and it would require a lot of money to implement the same. In reply, this accused told Sepoy Selim that if he talked that sort of speeches, his service might have been terminated. From the aforesaid confessional statement, it is crystal clear that the BDR rebels were involved in conspiracy

With regard to the conspiracy, the confessional statement of No.71318 Sepoy Md. Ziaul Haque CS accused No.27, indicates that about six months before the occurrence at Pilkhana, this accused happened to meet Sepoy Selim Reza of 44 Rifle Battalion, who told him, ‘would they not go to the mission and would they not need their own officers in BDR?’ At that time Sepoy Mehedi was present at that place. However, on 01.02.2009, this accused was appointed as guard at DG Bungalow. The aforesaid confessional statement suggests that the BDR rebels were involved in the conspiracy to remove the army officers from the BDR force.

As far as the conspiracy, the confessional statement of No.73929 Sepoy Md. Abdul Motin CS accused No.12 of 44 Rifle Battalion, speaks out that about five/six months before the occurrence at Pilkhana, the BDR soldiers of 44 Rifle Battalion used to talked about the money of operation Dal-Vhat. This accused got nine thousand taka from the Dal-Vhat programme. The BDR soldiers present over there were engaged in conversation with each other that each of the BDR soldiers was supposed to get 30/35 thousand taka from the Dal-Vhat programme.

From the confessional statement of  No.65707 Sepoy Md. Emran Chowdhury CS accused No.34 of 24 Rifle Battalion, it appears that this accused would know that there was an implied grievances and dissatisfactions in between the army officers in BDR and the BDR soldiers over 100% ration facilities, time scale, leave for two months, appointment of the own officers like cadre services, increase of border allowances, opportunity to participate in foreign missions, equal salary scale with that of the army soldiers and dividends accrued from the operation Dal-Vhat programmes.

It appears from the confessional statement of No.58078 Sepoy Sheikh Md. Ayub Ali CS accused No.38 of 16 Rifle Battalion attached with Sadar Rifle Battalion that this accused was the runner of Brigadier General SM Golam Rabbani, DDG and on that advantage he was introduced with one Zakir Hossain, the owner of prime coaching centre. After retirement of Brigadier General SM Golam Rabbani, DDG, he was attached with Sadar Rifle Battalion giving posting thereto. Before the National Parliamentary election in 2008, the aforesaid Zakir Hossain carried out election campaign among this accused and others and told that if the Awami League went to the power, an opportunity to get time scale of BDR soldiers for a period of eight years, to get 100% ration facilities and to go to the foreign missions would be created.

It stems out from the confessional statement of No.63907 Sepoy Md. Selim Reza CS accused No.6 of 44 Rifle Battalion that this accused was in service as clerk at E company of 44 Rifle Battalion. He would know about every soldier of E company. He would notice that the BDR soldiers used to discuss about their grievances and demands. The demands among others were to give opportunity to go to the UN missions, to provide 100% ration facilities from 60% ration facilities to the BDR soldiers, to make appointment of their own officers through BCS examination, to increase border allowances from taka 260, to enact law for the BDR soldiers like the PRB of police, not to depute the army officers in BDR forces, to give promotion according to their qualifications and performances and to remove the discrimination with regard to the salaries etc. In 1991 the BDR soldiers committed a mutiny for materializing their demands and for that reasons, the services of many BDR soldiers were terminated. In the month of January, 2009, the Hon’ble Home Minister and the State Minister visited BDR Headquarters. After 2/1 days, Sepoy Moin of 13 Rifle Battalion informed this accused that Colonel Anisuzzaman, Director (Administration) presented the demands of the BDR soldiers to the Hon’ble Ministers comparing their facilities with that of the facilities of police. Keeping apart the demands of BDR soldiers, the army officers only apprised the Hon’ble Ministers of their family residences, vehicles and necessary arms and ammunitions. DG BDR did not submit the demands of

It is apparent from the confessional statement of RDO-153 DAD Mirza Habibur Rahman CS accused No.3, that he was DAD and in charge of quarter master of 13 Rifle Battalion, BDR Headquarters at Pilkhana. The BDR soldiers used to discuss and talk about their grievances and demands on 100% ration facilities, removal of discrimination of their salaries, increase of border allowances, opportunity to go to the foreign missions and appointment of their own officers. It is palpable from the aforesaid confessional statements that the BDR soldiers were dissatisfied with the army officers for the reasons stated above and they were making plans for implementing their evil designs to overthrow the army officers from the BDR.             

It is manifest from the confessional statement of No.46194 Havildar Assistant Md. Moniruzzaman, CS accused No.29 of records wing that this accused was in service as Havildar clerk at Headquarters records wing. Before the parliamentary election in 2008, one Zakir Hossain, a civilian would work for parliamentary election on behalf of Barrister Mr. Fazle Noor Tapash PW575. One day Zakir Hossain took this accused and other BDR soldiers to the office of Barrister Mr. Fazle Noor Tapash and introduced them with him. On that day this accused along with Naik Mahbub, Lance Naik clerk Lutfur and Sepoy Tareque with 2/1 BDR soldiers went there. Going thereat, they discussed with Barrister Mr. Fazle Noor Tapash PW 575 about their different demands such as 100% ration facilities, participation in UN missions, increase of border allowances, introduction of defence allowances and appointment of their own officers through BCS examination and requested him to keep eyes on these matters. Barrister Mr. Fazle Noor Tapash requested them to work for him assuring that he would see the matters if they went to the power. 

It may be mentioned that as many as 538 accused made 164 statements involving themselves with the commission of offences as well as disclosing their grievances and dissatisfactions over the army officers. Going through the 164 statement given by Sepoy Md. Selim Reza, we find that the BDR members submitted as many as 55 demands to the APS of the then Home Minister as they could not meet the then Home Minister Mrs. Sahara Khatun. Some of the demands were as follows:-

  1. to give opportunity to participate in UN peace mission programmes .
  2. to increase ration facilities from 60% to 100%.
  3. to appoint their own officers through BCS examination.
  4. to increase border allowances.
  5. to enact law like the police.
  6. not to bring any army officer in BDR.
  7. to give promotion considering their qualifications and performances.

VIII. to remove the discrimination with regard

to their salaries.

Some of the grievances and dissatisfaction of the BDR members were as under:-

  1.                 that the BDR members made a revolt at Pilkhana in 1991 for realization of their demands as a result of which many BDR members were terminated from their service.
  2.             that many BDR members were engaged in operation Dal-Vhat programme but proper payments were not made to them rather the army officers in BDR took their signature in blank bills and for those reasons, a huge dissatisfaction and excitement was prevailing in the minds of BDR members.
  3.         that many BDR members were punished to suffer imprisonment and many of them were reverted to lower rank for not giving proper weight of rice and oil to the customers.
  1. that the BDR members engaged in operation Dal-Vhat programme would not get the sack of rice and the container of soyabean oil in proper weight but they had to give payment for the full amount of rice and soyabean oil as a result of which they would not give proper weight of rice and oil to the customers but the army officers in BDR did not try to understand the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the BDR members, for which the BDR members were very dissatisfied with the army officers in BDR.

          However, the BDR members in order to materialize their demands went to PW 575 Barrister Fazle Noor Tapash and exchanged their views with aforesaid matters, which are evident from the evidence given by PW 575 Barrister Mr. Fazle Noor Tapash, MP who  has stated in his evidence that he is the member of parliament from constituency No. 12 in Dhaka. He started his election campaign having nominated from Awami League in 2008. His election office was at road No.32 (old) at Dhanmondi. During the election campaign in November of 2008 some civil uniformed persons came to his election office and introduced themselves as the members of BDR as well as voters of his election area. In the context of election discussions they told him to inform about their grievances to the people’s leader Sheikh Hasina regarding their 100% ration facilities, promotion and going abroad in mission and then he assured them to apprise the people’s leader Sheikh Hasina of those grievances. Accordingly, he informed the people’s leader of their grievances. In the middle of December some BDR members under the leadership of Zakir came to him again and then PW 575 Barrister Fazle Noor Tapash told them that he had already informed the people’s leader of their grievances. On the date of election on 29.12.2008 he inspected the vote centres of his election area. On that day he went to Hazaribag area through gate No.2 of the Pilkhana. He inspected the vote centres inside the Pilkhana and while he was there the BDR members again placed their charters of demands to him.

From the aforesaid evidence it is clear that the BDR members along with one Jakir Hossain, son of former BDR Subedar Kanchan Ali being members of a discipline force went to PW 575 Barrister Sheikh Fazle Noor Tapash with a view to implementing and materializing their demands behind the back of the authority in a clandestine manner violating the laws and rules of the discipline force. It appears that the initial conspiracy to kill the army officers and to defy the authority of the army officers were started in the year of 1991 and 2008 which transpires from the aforesaid evidence of PW 575 and the confessional statements of the accused.

As regards the conspiracy, it is evident from the confessional statement of No.47474 Lance Naik Md. Ekramul Islam, CS accused No.35 that after holding parliamentary election in 2008, 2/3 days after the election, this accused along with Sepoy Selim Reza of 44 Rifle Battalion and 3 other BDR soldiers assembled in the field of Basketball and talked with each other about their different demands. The discussions over their grievances and demands were started immediately after Maghreb prayer. Upon holding discussions, they came to a conclusion that their grievances with regard to 100% ration facilities, time scale, border allowances and others should be intimated to the local MP Mr. Fazle Noor Tapash. After 3/4 days, Sepoy Selim informed this accused that MP Mr. Fazle Noor Tapash had been informed of their grievances. After 4/5 days Sepoy Selim again informed this accused that MP Mr. Fazle Noor Tapash could not address their grievances. The confessional statement made by  No.47474 Lance Naik Md. Ekramul Islam, CS accused No.35 has been supported and corroborated by the confessional statement given by  No.47474 Lance Naik Md. Ekramul Islam CS accused No.35.

It appears from the confessional statement of RDO-153 DAD Mirza Habibur Rahman CS accused No.3 that 2/1 days after coming to power by Awami league government, this accused was at his office. At 11:00 a.m, Sepoy Moin, regimental clerk of 13 Rifle Battalion came to this accused and told him that despite many good reasons, their demands were not being fulfilled and for those reasons, they were making communication with the Ministers and MPs. Being senior officer, he had to go with them. This accused assured him of going with them. Firstly they asked him to go to local MP Mr. Fazle Noor Tapash but he could not go because of his pre-occupation. Apart from that, the newly elected MP Mr. Fazle Noor Tapash did not give any emphasis on the demands of the BDR soldiers.

It is visible from the confessional statement of No.46194 Havildar Assistant Khandaker Moniruzzaman CS accused No.29  that 15/20 days after election, this accused and others again went to the residence of MP Mr. Fazle Noor Tapash but they could not meet him on that day. The maternal uncle of MP Mr. Fazle Noor Tapash suggested them to place their problems in black and white. After 3/4 days this accused handed over a written copy to one Zakir writing their problems therein.    

The conspiracy against the army officers was gradually developed to eliminate them from the BDR with the passage of time as a result of which the BDR rebels started talking about their demands with different persons and the same are evident from the evidence of  PW 343 Sultanul Mohakkakin Babu alias S.M. Babu who has stated in his deposition that at the relevant time he was the journalist of ATN Bangla. For that reason, on 06.2.2009 one Sepoy Selim Reza talked with him over cell phone No.01190803305. He made a phone call for talking about the demands of BDR members.  PW 343, Sultanul Mohakkakin Babu alias S.M. Babu gave him time to come to his office in the afternoon of 15.02.2009. Sepoy Selim Reza and another came to his ATN Bangla office. At that time, Sepoy Selim Reza showed some leaflets and some torn notes of monies having laminated. He told that those torn notes of monies were of Dal-Vhat programme. The BDR officers took the original money in exchange of fake money. PW 343, Sultanul Mohakkakin Babu alias S.M. Babu kept the torn notes of monies along with leaflets containing the demands of the BDR members. Then he told Sepoy Selim Reza and another that for

        From the aforesaid evidence, it stems out that Sepoy Selim Reza and another went to ATN Bangla office to meet the  PW 343  for discussion on the monies involved in Dal-Vhat programme. They also requested him to publish a report on the demands of BDR members showing him some leaflets and torn monies which were allegedly given to them by the army officers. They also expressed grudge against the army officers and requested him to broadcast the news over the issues in the television. It is also a part of conspiracy as the BDR members behind the back of the authority made contact with  PW 343  for materializing their demands. The BDR soldiers being the members of discipline force defying the authority and command of the higher authority as well as violating the laws and rules of the discipline force made contact with  PW 343 Sultanul Mohakkakin Babu alias S.M. Babu,  which shows that the BDR soldiers in order to fulfil their demands were involved in secret conspiracy with a evil design to uproot the authority and command of the army officers from BDR.

As a part of conspiracy and in the garb of realizing demands, on 13.02.2009, the BDR rebels namely DAD Jalil, DAD Habib, Sepoy Selim, Sepoy Moin, Sepoy Tareq and Sepoy Ayub went to the residence of PW 345 Sheikh Fazlul Karim Selim, MP who has stated in his evidence that on 13.02.2009 the local people met him coming to his residence. At that time 6/7 persons took their seats in front of him and they introduced themselves as the BDR members. They introduced themselves as DAD Jalil, DAD Habib, Sepoy Selim, Sepoy Moin, Sepoy Tareq and Sepoy Ayub. They wanted to say about their grievances to him. PW 345 Sk. Fazlul Karim Selim, MP told the BDR members to place their charters of demands to the Ministry of Home. They told him about their problems on ration, vehicle and going to mission. They also told about their problems including the admission of their children to the school and college. Thereafter, PW 345 Sk. Fazlul Karim Selim,

With regard to the conspiracy of the BDR rebels, PW 634 Advocate Sahara Khatun, MP and former Home Minister has stated in her evidence that after the occurrence she came to know that some BDR rebels went to her government residence to meet her but they could not meet.

In order to fulfil their demands, the story of going of the BDR rebels to  PW575 Barrister Mr. Fazle Noor Tapash, MP, PW 345, Mr. Sk. Fazlul Karim Selim, MP and PW 634 Advocate Sahara Khatun, MP and Hon’ble Home Minister, has been supported and corroborated by the confessional statement of No. 63907 Sepoy Md. Selim Reza CS accused No.6 who has categorically stated in his confession that on 13.02.2009 at 12.00 noon Lance Naik Shahab Uddin of E Company of 44 Rifle Battalion informed this accused that in order to talk with regard to the demands of BDR members, they would go to the residences of Mr. Sheikh Fazle Noor Tapash MP and Mr. Sheikh Fazlul Karim Selim MP and for that reason he requested him to remain at the ground floor of Japan Bangladesh Hospital at 7:00 a.m near gate No.4 of Pilkhana. Subsequently, he informed that matter to Sepoy Moin, Sepoy RP Reza and Sepoy Kazol. On that day, that is, on 13.02.2009 after roll call at 7:30 p.m, this accused went to the ground floor of Japan Bangladesh Hospital at around 8:00 p.m. After his arrival, Sepoy Moin, Sepoy Rubel, Sepoy Shahadat, Havildar Monir, Lance Naik Shahab Uddin, Lance Naik Ekram, Lance Naik Tareq, Sepoy Ayub,

@      central RP Rezaul, Sepoy Rafiqul of 44 Rifle

Battalion, Sepoy Ayub of Sadar Rifle Battalion, Sepoy Sajjad of 13 Rifle Battalion, driver of DAD Habib of 13 Rifle Battalion and this accused went there. Going thereat, the BDR members did not find the Home Minister. Taking phone number from that chamber, Sepoy Rezaul talked with the Minister over mobile phone. The Minister informed him that she was busy with a party at the residence of one Minister and for that reason she requested him to come in the next day at the evening. Thereafter, in the next day, the BDR members went to the government residence of Home Minister at Baily road but the police on duty at the gate of Home Minister informed them that the Minister would not meet anyone on that day. Then all the BDR members came back to Pilkhana. Subsequently the BDR members namely Sepoy Moin, Sepoy Rezaul, Sepoy Ayub, Sepoy Kazol and this

accused under the leadership of DAD Habib and DAD Jalil went to the residence of the Hon’ble Home Minister several days in order to meet and talk with her regarding their demands, but they could not meet her. Then the BDR members talked with Mosharaf Hossain, APS to the Hon’ble Home Minister and handed over a charter of 55 demands to him and requested him to show the same to the Hon’ble Home Minister. The aforesaid facts have been supported and corroborated by the confessional statements of RDO- 153 DAD Mirza Habibur Rahman CS accused No.3, RDO-165 DAD Abdul Jalil CS accused No.5 and No-63922 Sepoy Kazol Ali CS accused No.11.  

After going to the residence of Hon’ble Home Minister and MPs for several times, the BDR members without waiting for the outcome of the decision from the Hon’ble Home Minister and MPs further made communication with each other for implementation of their demands from 22.02.2009. As per confession of  Sepoy Md. Kazol Ali, on 22.02.2009 accused  Sepoy Md. Kazol Ali CS accused No.11 went to bring medicine from the hospital, he happened to meet Sepoy Moin there. On meeting Sepoy Moin told Sepoy Md. Kazol Ali to meet him at his office. When Sepoy Md. Kazol Ali met Sepoy Moin at his office, Sepoy Moin told him that they could not do anything making communication with the Hon’ble Home Minister and the MPs. Now they had to distribute leaflets. Sepoy Moin told Sepoy Md. Kazol Ali that he would compose and distribute the leaflets. Thereafter Sepoy Md. Kazol Ali came back there from. On 23.02.2009 at around 8:00 p.m Sepoy Selim came to Sepoy Md. Kazol Ali and then they went to the field of 44 Rifle

         From the aforesaid evidence and the confessional statements, it indicates that the BDR members namely DAD Habib, DAD Jalil, Sepoy Selim Reza, Sepoy Kazol, Sepoy Moin, Lance Naik Tareq, Havildar Monir, Sepoy Ayub, Sepoy RP Reza, Lance Naik Shahabuddin, Lance Naik Ekram, Sepoy

Rubel, Sepoy Sajjad, Sepoy Shahadat, Sepoy Mehedi along with one Jakir Hossain, son of former BDR Subedar Kanchan Ali and owner of prime coaching centre being the members of discipline force went to PW 345 Mr. Sheikh Fazlul Karim Selim, MP PW 575 Barrister Mr. Sheikh Fazle Noor Tapash, MP, PW 634 Advocate Sahara Khatun MP and PW 343 Sultanul Mohakkakin Babu alias S.M. Babu for talking about their demands and grievances and they also expressed unholy dissatisfactions against the army officers, which was not permissible under the provisions of the Bangladesh Rifles Order, 1972. The aforesaid evidence shows about the pre-planned conspiracy of the BDR rebels to root out the army officers from the BDR. The aforesaid evidence further indicates that the BDR rebels were very alert before the occurrence in implementing their demands. They also talked with  PW 634 over cell phone as per confessional statement of Sepoy Selim Reza but non- fulfilment of demands prompted them to make criminal conspiracy to eliminate the army officers from BDR.

Evidence with respect to composing leaflets at Prime Coaching Centre.

        The BDR rebels in order to realize their demands went to different responsible persons and side by side they also composed leaflets containing their demands and grievance with a view to distributing the same to different places of BDR quarter and neighbouring places of BDR Headquarters. The aforesaid fact is evident from the evidence of PW 31 No-60737 Sepoy Feroj Hossain Daptari, Recordss wing, pilkhana, Dhaka who has stated in his evidence that at the time of occurrence, by the permission of the authority, he along with his family members would live at Kenadi Bhaban, 26/6/A Monasshar Road, 1st Lane, Hajaribag, Dhaka outside Pilkhana gate No.5. His daughter was studying at Bir Shrestho Noor Mohammad Rifles Public School. In order to have some discussions on the admission issue of his daughter, he went to Prime Coaching Centre on 15.02.2009. When he was talking with Zakir, the owner of the Prime Coaching Centre, he found Havildar Assistant Khandaker Moniruzzaman of BDR Records wing thereat. He found him to compose some write-ups on the computer and also found one Zakir, the owner of the Prime Coaching Centre sitting beside him. The aforesaid Zakir asked him to wait for a while, when he wanted to talk with him over admission matters. Thereafter, he went near the computer and found that

The story of composing leaflets at the prime coaching centre by the BDR rebels has been supported and corroborated by the evidence of  PW 429 Md. Iqbal Hossain (Civilian) who  has stated in his evidence that at the time of occurrence, he would work as a manager in the Prime Coaching Centre and he would reside in the class mess of Prime Coaching Centre. The children of BDR members would study in the said Prime Coaching Centre. One Zakir son of BDR Subedar Kanchan Ali was the owner of the said Prime Coaching Centre. For that reason, he had good relationship with the BDR members. The BDR members would frequently come to the said coaching centre and would talk with Zakir regarding their different demands and grievances. The said Zakir would listen to the problems of the BDR members and would give advice to them. Ahead of observance of BDR week, Sepoy Ayub, Sepoy Tareq, Sepoy RP Reza, Sepoy Shahbuddin, Sepoy Mofiz, Lance Naik Mojibur, Naik Sharif, Havildar Mohiuddin, Havildar Monir, Sepoy Badal, Sepoy Latif, Naib Subedar Saidur, F.S. Khairul and many others would come to Zakir for having advice for realization of their demands. In the evening of 17.02.2009 and 18.02.2009 at 7:00/8:00 p.m, the aforesaid accused came to the coaching centre and held a meeting there

It may be mentioned that the leaflets which were composed at the Prime Coaching Centre were distributed to different places of BDR Headquarters and the same were subsequently found and recovered by the BDR authority.

In this regard, PW 7 Major Tarek Md. Vawali has testified in his evidence that on the occasion of BDR week in the month of February, 2009, he was entrusted with distribution of invitation card to the invitees and accordingly he joined BDR Headquarters on 14.02.2009. After joining, he used to come to his office at Pilkhana from his residence at Nakhalpara. On 21.02.2009, some leaflets were distributed in BDR Headquarters premises. Under the circumstances, 11 Major of BDR were posted at important establishments and he was entrusted with duty officer at quarter guard on 23.02.2009 from 14:00 p.m to 22:00 p.m. On 24.02.2009, while he was on duty, he happened to meet Major Shahnewaz at 10:00 hours. At that time Major Shahnewaz informed him of leaflets recovered on 21.02.2009. He was reported that Sepoy Selim Reza, Sepoy Moin, Lance Naik Ekram distributed the leaflets. The leaflets were composed in the computer from the prime coaching centre of Zakir adjacent to gate No. 5. At the end of his duty on 24.02.2009, he returned to his residence.

The story with regard to composing leaflets arising out of dissatisfactions of BDR members and recovery of the same from the Pilkhana premises have been categorically described in the evidence of PW 6 Major Rezaul Mostafa Md. Asad-Ud-Daula who has stated in his evidence that he went to mission and joined in the BDR on 02.10.2006. After joining in BDR he performed his duty as zonal field officer for two months at Cox’s Bazar. Thereafter he joined as Western Desk Staff Officer of Rifle Security Unit (RSU) at BDR Headquarters, Pilkhana. During that time, he would also work as co-ordination officer of Khulna, Rajshahi, Dinajpur and Rangpur Zone of BDR. He was also in charge of quarter master and also discharged administrative functions. Major Gazzali was in charge of Eastern Desk and co-ordinated the works of Mymensingh, Dhaka, Sylhet, Khagrachari, Rangamati, Comilla and Cox’s Bazar zones. In the absence of Adjutant, he was also in charge of Adjutant

note books, they wrote down the contents which were to be written in the counter leaflets. The points were of welfare activities in the BDR for last 3/4 years, expenditures on marriage of the children of the BDR soldiers, medical allowances, developments of treatment in the hospital, communications of BDR soldiers from the remote and inapproachable area by helicopter, distribution of money of operation Dal- Vhat, increase of admission quotas for the children of BDR members to Pilkhana School, development of ration facilities and accommodations and purchase of new vehicles. He was asked to inform Major Gazzali who was absent at that time. Later on, he informed Gazzali of the matter. DG also talked with Commanding Officer (CO). Subsequently Commanding Officer (CO) asked them to prepare counter leaflet on that day instead of the next day and

ordered Lieutenant Colonel Sayeed, Lieutenant Colonel Sajjad and other officers to collect information. Major Shahnewaz was asked to send information of Dal-Vhat programme. Commanding Officer and Shahnewaz thereafter went to Dhaka sector. He returned to his office and asked others to collect information. Lieutenant Colonel Sayeed called him and asked for a copy of the leaflet. He informed him that it was available with major Shahnewaz. He then collected the said copy from Major Shahnewaz, kept a copy with him and collected information. On discussion with Major Shahnewaz, this witness came to know that Sepoy Moin of 13 Rifle Battalion, Sepoy Selim Reza of 44 Rifle Battalion and Lance Naik Ekram of 24 Rifle Battalion composed and distributed the leaflets at Pilkhana premises. Afterwards they had discussion with Commanding Officer (CO) over the matter. The Commanding Officer (CO) replied that he had a talk with DG and necessary steps would be taken. Counter leaflets did not require to be published. On 25.02.2009 at 8:00 a.m police sergeant Ahad, a relative of Major Gazzali informed this witness over phone of recovery of a leaflet concerned with BDR matters at Farmgate. He informed the Commanding Officer (CO) of the leaflets. Major Gazzali confirmed that the leaflets recovered from Pilkhana and farmgate were of same nature. Commanding Officer (CO) directed Major Shahnewaz to collect more information in that regard.

With respect to leaflets, PW 13 Major Munshi Mahbubur Rahman, BUP-Mirpur Cantonment, Dhaka stated in his evidence that on 05.01.2009 he joined as Second-In-Command (2IC) of 44 Rifle Battalion, Pilkhana. On 22.02.2009, he got

information for discussion on leaflet matters which were found at Pilkhana. After Maghreb prayer, he attended the conference meeting. In that meeting, he along with Major Shahnawaz and Lieutenant Colonel Shamsul Islam was present in the meeting. A discussion was held on leaflets in that conference but no decision was taken in that regard. Major Shahnawaz informed that the leaflets were distributed from 44 Rifle Battalion. The subject matter of the leaflets was that the BDR soldiers would not like to be controlled by the army officers. The other subject matter of the leaflets was of dissatisfaction over Dal- Vhat operation, the steps taken by the DG of BDR in not awarding financial benefits and other allowances to the BDR soldiers. Subsequently, the security at the Pilkhana was enhanced.

The evidence with regard to composing and distributing leaflets at Pilkhana premises stands supported and corroborated by the confessional statements of No.44274 Havildar Md. Masud Iqbal of Rifle Security Unit (RSU) CS accused No.164 who has stated in his confession that this accused lastly joined Rifle Security Unit (RSU) Dhaka zone on 03.12.2008, remained in the Pilkhana and performed his duties as admin. NCO. On 21.02.2009, when this accused was at the 3rd floor of RSU building, he came to know from Naik Zahangir over mobile phone that one leaflet containing the charters of demands was attached beneath the stairs of an old building situated in front of the soldiers line of 24 Rifle Battalion. This accused informed senior JCO Naib Sabedar Rafiqul Islam of the leaflet. Naib Subedar Rafiqul Islam told him to come at the ground floor from the upstairs. Then Naib Subedar Rafiqul came there from JCO mess. Thereafter, this accused along with senior JCO Naib Sabedar Rafiqul Islam went to that place by a motor cycle and came to see the leaflet beneath the stairs. At that time Naik Jahangir was also present there. Accordingly, JCO Naib Sabedar Rafiqul Islam informed the Zone Commander Major Hossain Sohel Shahnewaz of the leaflet. Then the Zone Commander directed them to come to him picking up the leaflet there from. Picking up the leaflet they went to the officers mess by a motor cycle and handed over the same to Zone Commander Major Hossain Sohel Shahnewaz. The zone commander further directed them to look for the leaflet or poster if any in the other places at the Pilkhana. Getting order from zone commander they moved to different places and found one poster attached with a tree at Sultan ground, one

poster near JCO mess and one poster in front of Noor Mohammad College. Picking up all the posters from the different places they handed over those posters to zone commander Major Shahnewaz. The leaflets were written addressing the Hon’ble Prime Minister stating some objectionable remarks against the DG and the army officers. The aforesaid posters contained, ‘DG BDR purchases precious vehicles for them but the BDR soldiers use broken vehicles, perform their duties on foot, do not get proper monies from operation Dal- Vhat programme and monies of breakfast while on duty at Bissho Estema (World Muslims congregation) as those monies were misappropriated by the army officers’. In the posters a proper justice was solicited from the Hon’ble Prime Minister. On getting leaflets/posters, Zone Commander Major Shahnewaz, Major Gazzali Dostogir and Major Asad Ud Doulah

went to the office of Commanding Officer (CO) Lieutenant Colonel Enshad Ibn Amin and there from all the officers went to Headquarters. At 2:45 p.m, Major Hossain Sohel Shahnewaz came to his office from the Headquarters and gave briefing stating that Hon’ble Prime Minister would come at Pilkhana on 24.02.2009 and for that reason, Zone Commander thanked Naik Zahangir for giving information about the leaflet and directed all to perform their duties opening eyes and ears. From that night, the officers and DAD were entrusted with 24 hours duty at Kote and Magazine and the duties of this accused and others were also increased.

The aforesaid fact stands supported and corroborated by the confession of  No.45596 Naik Kaiyum CS accused No.165 who has stated in his confession that on 16.02.2009, he was brought to Dhaka Zone from Rifle Security Unit (RSU), Dinajpur Zone. On 21.02.2009, after completion of duty, he stayed at the barrack. At 8:30 a.m RSU Naik Jahangir informed Havildar Major Masud Iqbal over mobile phone that a leaflet with regard to demands was attached beneath the stairs of an old building of 24 Rifle Battalion. He came to know about that news from Masud Iqbal as he was with him. Later Masud Iqbal informed senior JCO of the matters and then he started for taking information. This accused along with other F.S members went out towards another place. This accused did not find anything but Havildar Masud Iqbal got a leaflet. On that day, at around 3:00 p.m in the afternoon, zone commander gave thanks to them for picking up leaflets.

Apart from this, JCO 5046 Subedar Md Yusuf Ali Khan, Rifle Security Unit (RSU), CS accused No.180 has stated in his confession that on 06.02.2009 when this accused was performing his duty as zone commander, he got message with regard to holding BDR week. Getting message, he came to Dhaka and became attached with BDR Headquarters at pilkhana, Dhaka. On 21.2.2009 at 8.00 a.m, coming to his office he came to know from Havildar Assistant Harun that a leaflet was distributed at Pilkhana. Getting that news he went to Subedar Rafique and wanted to know about the incident. Subedar Rafique told him that a leaflet was found. Havildar Zahangir told Havildar Masud that a leaflet was being attached with an old building of Dhaka sector. Having received the news Havildar Major Masud informed Naib Subedar Rafique of the same and then Rafique informed zone commander Major Helal of that news instantly. Major Helal ordered Subedar Rafique to bring the leaflets picking

Regarding leaflets,  No.25829 Havildar Md. Yusuf Ali CS accused No.75 has stated in his confession that he was a member of 36 Rifle Battalion. On 23.02.2009 at the time of fall-in of 36 Rifle Battalion, commander Naik Siraj told them that some leaflets were found at 24 and 44 Rifle Battalions. He came to hear that the aforesaid leaflets contained some write-ups with regard to 100% ration facilities of BDR soldiers like police personnel, demand of increase of border allowances and opportunity to go to foreign missions like police personnel. 

With respect to leaflets, No.63922 Sepoy Md. Kazol Ali CS accused No.11 has stated in his confession that on 22.02.2009 when he went to the hospital to bring medicine he was happened to meet Sepoy Moin who told this accused to meet him at his office. When this accused met Sepoy Moin who told him that nothing was availed going to the MPs and Ministers. Now they had to distribute leaflets. Sepoy Moin told him that he would compose and distribute the leaflets. Then this accused came back.

RDO/153 DAD Mirza Habibur Rahman CS accused No.3 has stated in his confession that on 22.02.2009 at 1:00 p.m, Unit Subedar Major Zobayer Hossain of 13 Rifle Battalion informed him that going to the meeting with regard to holding BDR week at central SM office, Subedar Major Zobayer Hossain came to know that the BDR members distributed leaflets in respect of their demands. Being aware of the leaflets, on 23.02.2009 at 8:30 a.m, when this accused got Sepoy Moin in veranda of his office, he asked Sepoy Moin with angry tone as to whether he was distributing leaflets. At that time Sepoy Moin denied that fact. But Sepoy Moin told him that he had taken a plan to distribute leaflets with regards to their demands in the different places of Dhaka City. Then he went away from that place.

As regards the leaflets, No.63907 Sepoy Md. Selim Reza CS accused No.6  has stated in his confession that Havildar Monir of records wing composed leaflets with regard to the demands of the BDR members in the prime coaching centre of Zakir Hossain. Thereafter the BDR members went to the residence of Mr. Sheikh Fazlul Karim Selim MP at Banani. The BDR members discussed with him about their demands.

As for the leaflets, RDO-105 DAD Touhidul Alam CS accused No.1 has stated in his confession that he was serving as Motor Transport Officer (MTO) at Sadar Rifle Battalion from June, 2008. 6/7 days before the occurrence on 25.02.2009, his acting commander Major Mostak Mahmud called him in his office and told, ‘a leaflet has been distributed, do you know about it?’ In reply, this accused told him that he did not know anything about it. Then his commander told him that alright if he did not know anything, then he could form a committee. Thereafter this accused namely DAD Touhid constituted a committee of 4/5 members being chairman of the same. In that committee, this accused namely DAD Touhid along

with senior JCO Subedar Munshi Jahangir, B.H.M

Havildar Tareq, RP NCO (could not recall the name)

and 2/1 Sepoy (could not recall the name) was

member. The members of the committee inquired into

the matters.    

The leaflet which was distributed by the BDR

rebels at Pilkhana before occurrence was produced

before the trial court by  PW626 JCO-5310 Naib

Subedar Md. Abdul Matin  and the same was

exhibited as exhibit-1132. The contents of the said

leaflet run as follows:- gvbbxq cÖavbgš¿x

Avgiv evsjv‡`k ivB‡djm GKwU ¯^vwab ‡`‡ki civaxb Ae‡nwjZ evwnbx| GB evwnbx‡Z †mbvevwnbxi Awdmvi Av‡m KgvÛ Kwi‡Z| Zviv wb‡R‡`i Pjvi Rb¨ KZ¸‡jv cvRv‡iv wbkvb †c‡U«vj wejvm

eûj Mvox wejvk eûj †KvqvUvi evs‡jv †iónvDm `iKvi †mRb¨ miKv‡ii gš¿x gvbbxq cÖavbgš¿x Kv‡Q wWgvÛ ‡ck K‡ib| mvaviY ˆmwb‡Ki †Kvb AviR wi‡cvU© miKv‡ii cÖwZwbwai Kv‡Q Ki‡ †`qbv| Avi Iiv †Zv ej‡ebv| miKvi wRÁvmv Kwi‡jI Iiv e‡j †`q wewWAvi Gi †Kvb mgm¨v †bB| GgbwK †`‡ki †Kvb mvsevw`K wewewm,

msev` `vZv ch©š— Avgv‡`i BDwb‡Ui wfZ‡i wK n‡”Q Zvnv Rvbvi Rb¨B KLbB Av‡mbv|

gvbbxq cÖavbgš¿x Avcwb MZ 1996 Bs m‡b Avcbx ¶gZvq Avmvi

c‡i ˆmwbK‡`i gv‡S †Lvjv `ievi wb‡qwQ‡jb| Avgv‡`i mvaviY ˆmwbK‡`i AviR †ck K‡iwQjvg, Zv‡Z A‡bK ˆmbx‡Ki mvRv/PvKzix

nviv‡Z n‡q‡Q| hvnv Avcbvi Kv‡Q Rvb‡Z †h‡Z cvwibvq| Gi c‡i

iv‡ó«i ¶gZv G‡m‡Q †eZb ˆelg¨i †bÎx Lv‡j`v wRqv, whwb †`‡k‡ cÖavbgš¿x n‡q cywjk wewWAvi Gi †eZb GK †KvUvq Avb¨ †mbvevwnbxi †eZb we‡kl †KvUvq| wZwb AwaKvsk mgq wcjLvbv G‡m‡Q ˆbk‡fv‡R| †mbvevwnbxi Awdmv‡ii mv‡_ †fvR K‡i P‡j hvB‡Zb| hvIqvi mgq K‡qK kZ cvRv‡iv Mvox Avi wewWAvi †K

klb I †kvlY AZ¨vPvi AwePvi Kivi Rb¨ wKQyKv‡jv AvB‡bi aviv

w`‡q hvq| Lv‡j`v wRqv wb‡R Ges Zvi †Kvb mivó«gš¿xi †iKW© †bB|

†h wewW Avi Gi ‡Kvb cÖwZwbwai mv‡_ †Lvjv `ievi †bIqv| A_P

Avcbvi ZrKvjxb ¯^ivó«gš¿x †gRi Aet iwdKzj Bmjvg wZwb wmgvš— K¨v‡¤ú wMqv mvavib ‰mwb‡K AviR wi‡cvU© ïb‡Zb|

gvbbxq cÖavbgš¿x

Avcbvi Kv‡Q Avgv‡`i GKwU gvÎ `vex wewW Avi †_‡K †mbvevwnbxi Awdmvi Zy‡j †bIqv nDK| cywj‡ki g‡Zv wewmGm cvk mywkw¶Z Awdmvi wb‡qvM w`‡q Avgv‡`i 100 eQ‡ii `vex cyiY Kivi Rb¨ Avcbvi Kv‡Q web‡qi mv‡_ AviR Kwijvg|

gvbbxq cÖavbgš¿x I‡`i `~Yx©wZi Kvh©Kjvc Avcbv‡K KvMR ‡wj‡L me Rvbv‡bv hv‡ebv| Aviwg Awdmvi Qvov Avgv‡`i †Lvjv `ievi wb‡j me

ej‡Z cvi‡ev| wewWAvi ev‡R‡Ui †Kvb UvKv LiP bv K‡i wewWAvi wWGwW my‡e`v‡ii KvQ †_‡K Pv‡ci gy‡L wmK‡bPvi wb‡qv M KR Kj‡g KvR †`wL‡q UvKv AvZ¥mvr K‡i| †Kvb iKg Reve w`wnZv Qvov gb hvnv Pvq ZvB K‡ib| †Kn gyL Lyj‡e †h Rb¨ me mgq kvwiixK KvR

K‡g©i gva¨‡g Pvgv‡ii g‡Zv e¨envi K‡i| †h‡nZy Mi“ evwnbxi Awdmvi Aa© wkw¶Z Zvnv‡Zv †`‡ki mevB Rv‡b|

GZw`b Avgiv ˆah¨© a‡i w`‡bi A‡c¶v K‡iwQ wKš‘ eZ©gv‡b I‡`i AZ¨vPv‡ii †kvlY Avi kvm‡bi R¡vjvq Avgv‡`i wcV †`qv‡j ‡V‡K †M‡Q| cÖwZ BDwb‡U GKwU ˆmwbK †gm Av‡Q| †mLv‡b ˆmwb‡Ki cÖvc¨ Lvbv †`qv nq bv | †gm KgvÛvi gv‡mi †k‡l Pvi j¶ UvKv e¨v‡j›m

bv †`Lv‡j Zvi ciewZ© cÖ‡gvlb eÜ _v‡K| Pvh©wmU evwb‡q mvRv w`‡q

†`q| Avi †mB UvKv †iwR‡g›Uvj Znwej bv‡g Rgv iv‡L| nvm Avi

nvwZi g‡Zv †mB UvKv w`qv LvB‡Z _v‡K| hZw`b wewWAvi G_v‡K ZZw`b Zv‡`i †eZb UvKv LiP K‡ibv| Ges j¶ j¶ UvKv hvIqvi

mgq wewWAvi †_‡K wbqv hvq| †Kvb Revew`wnZv †bB| gb hvnv Pvq

ZvB K‡i|

 gvbbxq cÖavbgš¿x

 eZ©gvb wWwR XvKv †m±i KgvÛvi K‡b©j gwReyj nK Wvj fvZ Gi gvjvgvj ÷K K‡i `vg evwo‡q A‡bK UvKv AvZ¥mvr K‡i‡Q †h Uv v

cÖvq 600 †KvwU UvKv †gRi gvnvey‡ei †bZ„‡Z¡ we‡`‡k cvv Pi Kivi

mgq wRqv wegvb e›`‡i aiv c‡i| Zvi ci †mbvcÖavb wMqv †m UvKv

wbqv hvq| gvbbxq cÖavbgš¿x H UvKv †Kv_vq miKvi Avgv‡`i Wvjfv‡Zi wej w`‡q‡Q †m UvKv Avgv‡`i‡K †`qbv `yBwU bv‡gi ZvwjKv K‡i GKwU‡Z e−vsK mB wb‡q‡Q Avi GKwU mvgvb¨

1000/500 UvKv K‡i w`‡q‡Q| evKx UvKv wWwR| †mt KgvÛvi †Pvi

¸‡jv‡Z AvZ¥mv` K‡i‡Q|

gvbbxq cÖavbgš¿x ej‡Z j¾v jv‡M Iiv GZ †QvU g‡bi †QvU N‡ii

gvbyl BR‡Zgv wWDwU‡Z ˆmwb‡Ki bv¯—vi ev‡R‡Ui UvKv †L‡q †d‡j‡Q| A_P cywjk e‡j Avcbv‡`i UvKv wbqv †M‡Q| wbe©vP‡bi wej

GLb ch©š— †`qbv I‡Z`i Gi g‡a¨ e`jx Avm‡j †Kvb iKg Reve

w`wnZv Qvov †m‡i hv‡e| ZvB eZ©gvb wWwR kvwKj Avn¤§` †mt KgvÛvi K‡b©j gywReyj nK Ges wWwRi ¯¿x H Kvj bvwMbxi e¨vsK GKvD›U Z`š— K‡i Acv‡ikb Wvjfv‡Zi KZ UvKv `yYx©wZ K‡i‡Q wewWAvi `ievi nj †Kb †m wb‡R Kg UvKv jR wbj Ges Wvjfv‡Zi

UvKv w`qv j¶ j¶ UvKvq Mvox wK‡b †m Mvox Avevi wb‡RivB wbjvg

K‡i 8 j¶ UvKvi Mvox 1 j¶ UvKvq wb‡q‡Q| Gi wePvi PvB|

wewWAvi evwnbx‡Z I‡`i †`L‡Z PvBbv cÖ‡qvR‡b Av›`j‡bi gva¨g

KzKz‡ii b¨vq mive| 

The recovery of the aforesaid leaflet from the

Pilkhana premises has been supported and

corroborated by the seizure list witnesses PW643 BA-

2536 Lieutenant Colonel Md. Atiquzzaman  and PW627 No.69407 Naik Assistant Md. Shariful Islam. The aforesaid fact of composition and distribution of leaflets at the Pilkhana premises by the BDR rebels indicates that the BDR rebels joined their hands with each others making pre-planned conspiracy in order to remove the army officers from the BDR force before the occurrence and the same is also conceived and inferred from the behaviours and conducts of the BDR rebels and from the objectionable languages used in the leaflets. From the leaflets, it is reasonable ground to believe that the BDR rebels conspired together to commit the offence of murder and other actionable wrongs if their demands are not fulfilled. Furthermore, the composition and distribution of leaflets are the outcome of the mala fide intention of the BDR rebels, which was first entertained by them before the occurrence. The aforesaid fact of composition and distribution of leaflets is a proof of conspiracy to remove the army officers from the BDR force and to commit the offence of murder and other offences and the BDR rebels were parties to the conspiracy as they were spotted in and around the Darbar Hall and other places at the time of occurrence at Pilkhana using and carrying the heavy and deadly weapons with ammunitions and killing the army officers and others. Under the circumstances, these leaflets are taken into consideration as proof of conspiracy of the BDR rebels in killing the army officers in view of Section 10 of the Evidence Act, 1872 and it may be used as evidence against the conspirators. It may be mentioned that the conspiracy is always done in secret. It is not always possible to prove conspiracy by direct

Evidence with regard to the secret meetings held by the BDR rebels in different places in order to implement their charters of demands through their evil designs and criminals conspiracy. 

Before the occurrence, that is, in the night of 24.02.2009, the BDR rebels held meeting at the rented house of  No. 41584 Lance Naik Signal Zakaria Mollah CS accused No.23 of 13 Rifle Battalion, wherein they decided about the roles to be played by them in the commission of offences at Darbar Hall and at different places, which are evident from the evidence of PW 337 Md. Shamsuzzaman @ Anu, son of late Abdul Hamid,  who has stated in his evidence that his mother and wife would reside at 39/2, Moneshwar Road, Dhaka. One BDR Sepoy namely Zakir hired his residence on payment of rent but he would not live in that room. His two sons would reside in that room. Sepoy Zakir would live in the ground floor of a 3-storied building situated at the eastern side of the road crossing 2/3 houses. The wife of Zakir would maintain a Beauty Parlour in that building. Two sons of Zakir remaining in the room would study in that room and would reside there now and then. On 24.02.2009 at 8:00 p.m he was gossiping with others in front of his house. One Rajib told Swapan that 2/3 persons had entered into the residence of Anu. Then he along with Swapan entered the room

         The evidence of PW 337 Md. Shamsuzzaman

@    Anu with regard to meeting at the rented house of No. 41584 Lance Naik Signal Zakaria Mollah was supported and corroborated by PW 338 K.M Kamrul Ashan Shah @ Swapan  who  has stated in his evidence that on 24.02.2009 at 8:30 p.m, he along with Rajib and Milton was gossiping standing there and at that time there was no electricity in that area. At that time, one Anu was with them. Rajib told him that some people in a group of 2/3 persons had been entering the house of Anu. He told Anu that who had been entering their house. Then Anu taking him entered his house. The tin shed house of Anu was consisted of 4 rooms. The family members of Anu remained in 2 rooms and one taxi driver remained in

another room on rent basis. The remaining rooms were taken on rent basis by BDR member Zakaria Molla @ Zakir for the purpose of study of his 2 sons. Going in front of the room, he and Anu found 2/3 persons standing in front of the door. Going inside the room, he found a burning candle therein and also found 11/12 persons seated around the candle. On query of Anu, they told him that they had come here to attend the milad-mahafil. Anu introduced himself as the owner of the house and one of them told him that they would go away after having some conversations. Thereafter, they kept the room under lock and key. After 10/12 minutes they went away from the room. One of them made handshake with Anu and introduced him as Moin and told that they were all BDR members. He further told that all the senior and junior members were there and that they had taken a decision. On hearing so, he went to his residence. In the morning he heard sound of firings and found photograph in the newspaper and thereby identified Sepoy Moin in a lying condition on the floor. It was his firm belief that Sepoy Moin and others were engaged in conspiracy of the massacres at Pilkhana and that they made conspiracy sitting in the rented room of Zakaria Molla following which the incident at the BDR Headquarters was happened on 25.02.2009. 

The story of going of the BDR members to the house of  No.41584 Lance Naik Signal Zakaria Mollah and their discussions by lighting up candle have been supported and corroborated by  PW576 Miraz Ahmed Rajib who has stated in his evidence that in the night of 24.02.2009, some people entered the residence of Anu. The maternal uncle of Anu namely Swapan told Anu that some people had entered his residence. Thereafter, both Swapan and Anu entered inside the residence of Anu. After 20/25 minutes later 10/12 persons went out of the residence. Then Anu told that those people had come to the room of BDR Zakaria, the tenant. At the time of departure, one of them made handshake with Anu and introduced himself as Moin. Anu told this witness that they had been discussing in the room of Zakaria lighting up the candle. After hearing sounds of bullets on 25.02.2009 he remained in his residence.

After holding meeting and taking decision with regard to their roles to be played in the commission of offences taken at the rented house of Zakaria Mollah, the BDR members came to Pilkhana through gate No.5. The aforesaid fact has been supported and corroborated by  PW 61 No.43607 Havildar Md. Ashrafuddin who has stated in his evidence that on 24.02.2009 at about 9:30 p.m, while he was coming to his residence after watching Tattoo show and reached gate No.5, he came to see Sepoy Rahman, Sepoy Ayub, Sepoy Atiqur Rahman, Sepoy Sadullah, Sepoy Kamrul, Sepoy Mezbahuddin, Sepoy Selim and many others of 44 Rifle Battalion, who were coming from the outside. On query, Sepoy Mizanur Rahman replied that they went to the house of Zakaria for realization of their demands.

The story of holding meeting and taking decision for implementation of their demands have also been supported and corroborated by the confessional statement of  No.41584 Lance Naik Md. Zakaria Mollah  CS accused No.23  who has stated in his confessional statement that he was in service as signal operator. On 24.02.2009, this accused was in duty at signal centre from 6:30 a.m to 2:00 p.m. After completion of duty he came to his residence at Hazaribag. On that day again he was entrusted with a duty from 6:30 p.m to 7:00 a.m. He would live in a rented house taking two rooms behind the beauty parlour at Hazaribag. One room was situated in the inner side a bit. Two rooms were in two separate buildings. At 8:30 p.m, Sepoy Bashar wanted the key of the room of a tin shed building from this accused. This accused told his wife to deliver the key of the room if wanted by Sepoy Bashar. At 9:00 p.m, coming at signal centre Sepoy Bashar informed him that Sepoy RP Azad, Naik signal Moinul, Signalman Tofazzal and 12/14 BDR members held a meeting at the house of this accused and made plans that they would implement their designs tomorrow as per the plans. In that plan, it was decided that in order to press their demands, Sepoy Moin would go to the Darbar

It appears from the confessional statement of No. 63907 Sepoy Md. Selim Reza CS accused No.6 who has stated in his confessional statement that on 24.02.2009, Sepoy Moin made a phone call to this accused and told him to meet at the field of 44 Rifle Battalion in the evening. After roll call, he went to the field. Going thereat, this accused came to see Sepoy Moin, Sepoy Shahadat, Sepoy Rubel of 13 Rifle Battalion, Sepoy Mizan, Sepoy Hasibul, Sepoy Kazol of 44 Rifle Battalion and 14/15 BDR members. Sepoy Moin told this accused that there was a residence outside gate No.5 of Pilkhana and it would be convenient to talk therein. Sepoy Moin then started for that place taking all the BDR members. Going out through gate No.5 and approaching 200 yards, they went to an empty house of a tin shed building. Reaching there, this accused came to see 30/35 BDR members. He recognised Lance Niak Ekram of 24 Rifle Battalion, but others were not known to him. However, Sepoy Moin was known to them. At that there was no electricity in that area. Sepoy Moin and others started discussions lighting up candle. It was decided in the discussions that tomorrow on 25.02.2009, all the BDR members would be assembled at the field of 44 Rifle Battalion within 7:00 a.m and thereafter they would loot the arms and ammunition from the Kote and Magazine keeping the officers under hostage. It was further decided that the officers would be put under hostage and then they would be confined to Rifles Public School and college. Thereafter that incident

It is evident from the confessional statement of No. 63922 Sepoy Md. Kazol Ali CS accused No.11 who has stated in his confessional statement that on 24.02.2009, a parade was held. On that day at 7:45 p.m, Sepoy Moin along 5/6 BDR members told this accused that there would be a meeting and for that reason he had to go outside. Sepoy Moin and others went to a tin shed house which was 70/80 yards straight away from gate No.5 and this accused after sometime at around 9:00 p.m went to gate No.5 and then Sepoy Rezaul showed him the meeting place. In that meeting this accused along with Sepoy Moin, Sepoy Rubel, Sepoy Mizan, Sepoy Habibul, Lance Naik Akram, Sepoy Habib and 30/35 BDR members was present.  It was decided therein that on 25.02.2009 at the time of holding Darbar, the officers would be kept under hostage at gunpoint looting the arms and ammunition from the Kote and Magazine and then it would be informed to the Government. The officers would be put under hostage until realisation of their demands and in that case, their demands would be fulfilled. The aforesaid fact of holding meeting and taking decision stands supported and corroborated by the confessional statements of No. 47474 Lance Naik Ekramul Islam CS accused No.35, No. 56942 Sepoy Md. Habibur Rhaman CS accused No.26 and No. 71318 Sepoy Md Ziaul Haque CS accused No.27.

Apart from this, another meeting was held on 24.02.2009 at around 10:00 p.m, at the office of Subedar Major SM Gofran Mollik of 24 Rifle Battalion, which is evident from the confessional statement of  No.65702 Sepoy Md. Emran Chowdhury CS accused No.34, runner of Lieutenant Colonel Lutfur Rahman Commanding officer of 24 Rifle Battalion, who has stated in his confession that on 24.02.2009 at 8:00 p.m this accused went to Shahjahanpur taking the mother-in-law of his Commanding Officer (CO). This accused came back there from at around 10:00 p.m. Thereafter he attended the meeting held at the office room of Subedar Major SM Gofran Mollik of 24 Rifle Battalion. In that meeting, this accused along with Subedar Major Gofran Mollik, Sepoy Azim Patwary, driver of Lieutenant Colonel Lutfur Rahman Commanding Officer (CO) of 24 Rifle Battalion, Havildar Taher and Lance Naik Karim both of 24 Rifle Battalion was present. It was decided in that meeting that in the next day, that is, on 25.02.2009 the army officers would be kept under hostage at the Darbar Hall and they would be killed if necessity arose. Gofran Mollik told this accused that if the chaos arose at the Darbar Hall, the Commanding Officer (CO) might go to his office. Subedar Major Gofran Mollik also told this accused to inform him over wireless set if the Commanding Officer (CO) went to his office and then he would go to the office. 1/1½ months before the occurrence, this accused would hear Subedar Major Gofran Mollik to say now and then in his office that the army officers would be kept under hostage for realisation of their demands if

It appears from the confessional statement of RDO. 133  DAD Md. Nasir Uddin Khan CS accused No.2 that he was attached with 44 Rifle Battalion as Deputy Assistant Director (DAD). On 24.02.2009 at 4:00 p.m, Sepoy Selim of 44 Rifle Battalion informed this accused that a meeting with regard to the demands of BDR members would be held at the field of Rifle Sports Board (RSB) at 8:00 p.m. In that meeting DAD Touhid, DAD Habib, DAD Jalil, DAD Rahim and many others would remain present. This accused was supposed to go there but he could not attend as there was a rehearsal programme for tattoo show. Moreover, on that night he was entrusted with a duty at central Magazine.        

Apart from aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, the following fact also enticed and inflamed the BDR members for which they became highly dissatisfied and furious with the army officers. It is noticeable from the confessional statement of  No. 61489 Sepoy Md. Abdul Muhit CS accused No.70 that on 24.02.2009 this accused was present at the parade which was arranged for observance of BDR week, 2009 as well as for the purpose of coming of the Hon’ble Prime Minister at Pilkhana. After taking salute at the parade, the Hon’ble Prime Minister did not deliver any speech in respect of the demands of the BDR members. Arising out of this matter, there was an implied dissatisfaction among the BDR soldiers. Unlike every year, the BDR soldiers were not invited with their family members and being aggrieved by the same, this accused without participating in the lunch purchased a hen and enjoyed the lunch with his family members. DG BDR misappropriated taka 600/- crore from Dal-Vhat programme. The shares of the BDR soldiers were not given to them. The officers took signature of the BDR soldiers on white papers but they did not provide any money to them. For those reasons, the BDR soldiers were highly dissatisfied with the army officers. Subsequently this accused came to hear that Sepoy Selim, Sepoy Kazol, RP Reza and others in order to realize their demands made contact with different political leaders.  

Evidence with respect to looting of arms breaking open the Kote/armoury.

It may be mentioned that in order to overthrow the army officers from the BDR, the BDR rebels looted the arms breaking open the Kote following their pre-planned criminal conspiracy and the aforesaid fact is evident from the evidence of PW 33 Lieutenant Colonel Md. Reazul Karim  who has stated in his evidence that on 25.02.2009, that is, on the date of occurrence, he was in service at BDR Headquarters. On that day, at about 6:00 a.m, he was on duty at the Central Quarter Guard. At about 8:50 a.m, he was sitting at the room of duty officer. Looking through the door he found that 20/25 BDR members were looking to and fro. Feeling doubt, he went to them, asked what they were doing and also asked the guard commander how they came there. Hearing his speeches, the BDR soldiers came upon this witness calling him as a son of bitch and gave him a good thrash by fists and kicks. On that time he saw that the guards of the Kote remained silent standing thereat. The soldiers took him there from lifting his body, tied his hands and legs with rope and chain and tried to kill

The aforesaid fact of looting arms from Kote has been supported and corroborated by the evidence of PW  453 Regiment No. 79173 Sepoy Ripon Kumar Biswas of 4 BGB, who has stated in his deposition that on 25.02.2009 and 26.02.2009, he had been working at 24 Rifle Battalion at Pilkhana. On that day they were assigned to a duty at the central quarter guard. At around 9:00 a.m of 25.02.2009, the BDR rebels attacked the quarter guard. Getting sound he tried to come out but the BDR rebels pointed their arms at him and told him that he would be shot down if moved anyway. In the meantime 5/7 BDR rebels took away the boxes of ammunitions breaking open the door of the Magazine. At that time he found duty officer Major Riaz who was kept confined in a JCO room under lock and key. The number of the BDR rebels was around 30/35 persons. After a while the BDR rebels went away from the quarter guard taking arms breaking open the door of the Kote. Among them he identified Sepoy Selim Reza Regiment No. 63907, Sepoy Kazal Ali Regiment No. 63922, Sepoy Rafiqul Regiment No. 74852, Sepoy Jashim Mollik Regiment No. 74694, Sepoy Habibur Rahman Regiment No. 56942, Sepoy Sajjad Regiment No. 77224 of 13 Rifle Battalion and Lance Naik Ekramul Regiment No. 47474. Immediately after the same he heard sound of firings from the Darbar Hall.

Evidence with regard to looting ammunitions breaking open the Magazine by the BDR rebels.

The BDR rebels in order to implement their evil design and to uproot the army officers from the BDR also looted ammunitions breaking open the Magazine following their pre-planned conspiracy taken in different meetings held in different places. The story of looting ammunitions breaking open the Magazine has been described in the evidence of PW 35 Sepoy Md. Tobbas Ali, who has stated in his evidence that on 25.02.2009, he was on duty at the central Magazine. On that day, Havildar habibur, Havildar Majid, Havildar Kalam, Sepoy Munnaf, Sepoy Lutfor, Sepoy Al-Amin and Sepoy Abu Bakar were also on duty with him. He was assigned to duty from 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m. Handing over the charge of duty, he went to guard room for rest at 9:00 a.m. At about 9:15 a.m, 14/15 BDR rebels entered the Magazine. The BDR rebels directed them to open the door failing which they gave threat to kill them. Among the BDR rebels, this witness identified Sepoy Altaf, Sepoy Siddique and Sepoy Mizan of 44 Rifle Battalion and Sepoy Paltan Chakma and Sepoy Lutfor Alam of 24 Rifle Battalion. Before that event, DAD Miraj took the arms from the guards on duty and other guards and kept those under the lock and key. Being unarmed, this witness could not make any resistance to the BDR rebels. The BDR rebels took away arms and ammunitions shutting the door from the outside, while he remained inside the Magazine. He came out from the back door and found hundreds of BDR rebels who were opening fires repeatedly with their arms. Out of fear of life, he came to 24 Rifle Battalion running and hid himself thereat.

The event of looting arms and ammunitions breaking open the Kote and Magazine also stands supported and corroborated by the confessional of No. 63907 Sepoy Md. Selim Reaz of 44 Rifle Battalion CS accused No.6, who has stated in his confession to the effect that on 25.02.2009 at around 6:30 a.m, this accused went to the field of 44 Rifle Battalion in order to be fall-in for the purpose of attending the Darbar. 10/12 BDR soldiers of E company of 44 Rifle Battalion also fell-in in the field with him. This accused told Sepoy Rafique that he should not go to the Darbar. When the BDR soldiers were marching towards the Darbar Hall this accused went out of the lines in the name of making water. This accused again came to the field along the dophikhana (cloth washing room) road. At that time, looking at Sepoy Mehedi with fatigue dress, this accused asked him that where he was going. In reply, Sepoy Mehedi informed this accused that he was going to I.N.T for working. This

Evidence with regard to killings and massacres at the Darbar Hall and at different places at Pilkhana following the criminal conspiracy, common intention and common object of the BDR rebels.

PW 5 BA-3015 Lieutenant Colonel Md Abdul Mukim Sarkar, Army Headquarters, Dhaka Cantonment has vividly described as to how the BDR rebels entered the Darbar Hall and committed the offences of murder along with other offences. PW 5 Lieutenant Colonel Md. Abdul Mukim Sarker has

stated in his evidence that he joined BDR in the year 2007 from army. On 25.02.2009 he had his seat in the middle place of the officers row of the Darbar Hall. Darbar was started at 9:00 a.m with the recitation from the Holy Quran. At the very outset of Darbar, after discussing 2/1 issues, DG BDR started making speech on Dal-Vhat programme. DG BDR told the BDR soldiers that all the benefits earned from Dal-Vhat Programme would be given to all the BDR soldiers. The BDR soldiers who did not participate in that programme were also given daily allowances (DA) for 10 days. DG BDR further told that the outstanding demand of the government was paid from the benefits of the Dal-Vhat programme and the remaining outstanding demand of the government amounting to taka 4 crore would also be paid gradually. DG BDR further told that the money, by selling the remaining

goods of the Dal-Vhat programme, would be used for the welfare of the BDR soldiers. After telling the aforesaid fact, DG BDR started talking over smuggling affairs. DG BDR further told adding that 33 Rifle Battalion and 22 Rifle Battalion had stood 1st and 2nd respectively.   DG BDR categorically said that goods amounting to taka about 1 crore were being caught every day but goods amounting to taka about 9/10 crore were being lost regularly. At one stage, DG tried to get support of the BDR soldiers in support of his deliberations but he did not find any response. Afterwards, DG BDR spoke on 2/1 more issues. At that moment Sepoy Moin and Sepoy Kazol entered into Darbar Hall with arms from left side of DG. By shouting, Sepoy Moin came up to the stage and pointed arms at DG. Under the aforesaid situation, the BDR soldiers stood up and there happened a hue and cry. This witness heard sound of firings and then the BDR soldiers began to run to and fro. This witness came to see that BDR personnel started going out of the Darbar Hall by breaking down the glasses of windows of the north side of the Darbar Hall. At one stage he also came out of the Darbar Hall through that window and became perplexed. Thereafter he proceeded towards the north side of the field and happened to meet two RP soldiers. He asked them about the occurrence but they did not give any reply. Then this witness proceeded towards the north side a bit and came to see 10/12 soldiers who were proceeding towards Darbar Hall with arms. He became afraid of seeing their mood and then he went towards the training shed in the east side. After a while, among the BDR rebels who were proceeding towards the Darbar Hall, he identified

PW 9 Lieutenant Colonel Md. Maksudul Hoque has also given description as to commission of offences at the Darbar Hall by the BDR rebels by stating the same in his evidence that on 15.02.2009, he got President Rifle Award from BDR Comilla Sector. For receiving award, he was attached with Pilkhana and attended Darbar on 25.02.2009 at 8:40 a.m. Darbar was started at 9:00 a.m. Initially DG exchanged greetings. At about 9:30 a.m, DG was delivering his speech over Dal-Vhat programme saying that the dividends from Dal-Vhat programme would be deposited in the welfare account of BDR officers and soldiers. At one stage of speech of DG, Sepoy Moin of 13 Rifle Battalion with arms at hands entered the Darbar Hall and pointed arms at DG. Thereafter Sepoy Kazol of 44 Rifle Battalion also entered the Darbar Hall. During that time, DDG remained seated beside the left side of DG. DDG caught hold of Sepoy Moin and then other officers disarmed him. Sepoy Moin fell down on the stage. He came to see one officer from medical core to untie the button of the shirt of Moin. At that time Sepoy Kazol escaped from the Darbar Hall. Afterwards he heard a sound of firing and instantly one of the BDR personnel made a sound shouting a words ‘Jago’

("Rv‡Mv') . At that time there happened violence in the Darbar Hall and some BDR soldiers stood up. DG told the BDR soldiers to be calm and quiet and wanted to hear their speeches. Then some of the BDR soldiers started leaving the Darbar Hall. DG directed them not to leave the Darbar Hall but the BDR soldiers started leaving the Darbar rapidly. The BDR soldiers started leaving the Darbar Hall breaking down the glasses of the doors and the windows. This witness came to hear sound of firings from the outside of the Darbar Hall. The sound of firings started increasing gradually. DG also directed all the commanders to control their respective troops. At one stage, the senior officers taking DG took shelter behind the screen of the stage. As firings were coming inside the Darbar Hall, they all laid down on the floor. Subsequently, the Darbar Hall became empty. This witness was observing all the

situations concealing himself behind the screen of the stage. All of a sudden, 10/15 BDR rebels with arms and ammunitions entering the Darbar Hall started opening firings indiscriminately and asked all officers under shelter in different places to come out raising their hands over the head. Many officers started coming out at the order of BDR rebels. The BDR rebels took 10/15 officers at gunpoint outside the Darbar Hall raising their hands. Afterwards he heard heavy sound of firings outside the Darbar Hall. A few minutes later, Sepoy Selim Reza of 44 Rifle Battalion appeared near the stage raising arms in hands and megaphone and asked the officers remained behind the stage to come out by megaphone, failing which he threatened to kill them. At that time, DG and DDG along with 10/12 officers came out from the stage. Then Sepoy Selim Reza rebuking the officers ordered them to go ‘one by one’. Getting order, DG and other officers started going towards the west side of the Darbar Hall maintaining a line. At that time, apart from Sepoy Selim Reza, Sepoy Sajjad Hossain of 13 Rifle Battalion, Sepoy Ibrahim, Sepoy Obaidul, Sepoy Rafiqul of 44 Rifle Battalion and Lance Naik Ekran of 24 Rifle Battalion and some others BDR rebels were also proceeding towards the west side of the Darbar Hall aiming arms at the army officers. As soon as the DG and other officers went out of the Darbar Hall through west-north gate of the Darbar Hall, the violent firings were started. The officers started fleeing away for shelter. He came to see Sepoy Selim Reza, Sepoy Atoar of 44 Rifle Battalion, Sepoy Ibrahim, Sepoy Obaidul, Sepoy Rafiqul, Sepoy Sajjad,

From the evidence of P.Ws. 3, 4, 5, 6, 8, 9, 10, 11, 13, 15, 17, 19, 20, 21, 25, 26, 27, 34, 36, 38, 41,42, 43, 45, 48, and 49 it appears that on 25.02.2009, the meeting at the Darbar Hall was started at 9:00 a.m with the recitation from the Holy Quran. In that meeting around 97 officer along with 2500-3000 BDR soldiers were present. DG of BDR delivered speech on Dal-Vhat programme and on smuggling issues and disclosed that the dividends earned from Dal-Vhat programme would be used for the welfare of BDR members. The DG of BDR delivered speech stating that illegal goods worth Tk. 1 (one) crore were being seized everyday but the fact remained that the goods worth Tk 9/10 crore were always found missing. At one stage, DG tried to get support of the soldiers in support of his deliberations but he did not find any response. Thereafter, DG spoke about other matters. At that moment, Sepoy Moin being armed with weapon entered the Darbar Hall from the left side of

With regard to the attack at the Darbar Hall and killing of the army officers inside the Darbar Hall, PW21 BA-5450 Major Syed Monirul Alam, at present A.R.T, Savar Cantonment has stated in his evidence that he joined as commissioned officer in Bangladesh Army on 3rd January, 1995. On 1st May, 2007, he joined in BDR on deputation. For the purpose of observance of BDR week, he joined in BDR Headquarters from 26 Rifle Battalion. He used to attend the office by a Motorbike from his Rampura residence. On 24.02.2009, the Hon’ble Prime Minster visited the parade held on the occasion of BDR week, 2009. In that parade, he acted as contingent commander. A meeting for the BDR officers and forces was scheduled to be held at Darbar Hall on

25.02.2009 at 8:00 a.m. In order to participate in that meeting, he started from his residence at 7:00 a.m, reached 24 Rifle Battalion within 20 minutes therefrom and started waiting therein. He made a phone call to Major Momin and came to know that the meeting would be held at 9:00 a.m instead of 8:00 a.m. At about 8:30 a.m, he along with Major Momin and Major Maksumul Hakim went to Darbar Hall to participate in the meeting and took their respective seats. At 9:00 a.m, the DG of the BDR appeared in the meeting and started delivering his speeches on different matters including the operation Dal-Vhat. After a while, the DG of BDR informed that the outstanding money earned from the operation Dal- Vhat would be used for the welfare of the BDR members. As soon as the DG of the BDR told about the operation Dal-Vhat, sepoy Moin of 13 Battalion

came over the stage with arms and pointed the same at DG. Then and there all the BDR members stood up. At that time, he heard of a firing. The DDG of the BDR escaped the DG and detained the sepoy Moin with the help of other BDR officers. On such situation, the BDR members started leaving the Darbar Hall raising a hue and cry thereat. Looking through the glass, he found that the BDR rebels were coming towards the Darbar Hall opening fire in the air. The DG encircled by other BDR officers ordered all to come in the Darbar Hall again. He informed his wife of the incident. The terrible firings were started around the Darbar Hall. In order to protect him, he entered into the washroom and took shelter in a basin with Major Maksumul. A gang consisting of 10/12 BDR rebels entered into the Darbar Hall and used filthy languages towards the BDR officers. During that period, he identified Sepoy Zia and Sepoy Razibul of 44 Battalion. Thinking of danger he changed his shelter place. After a while the BDR rebels entered into the washroom, found Maksumul Hakim and opened fire on him. As a result, he died on the spot. Being afraid of, he lay on the floor and remained there as a dead man. Then one of the rebels told Sepoy Zia and Sepoy Razibul to leave the place making a comment that all sons of the bitches had died. He found 5/6 BDR rebels through the window and among them, he identified Sepoy Sajjad, Sepoy Rubel and Sepoy Shahadat of 13 Battalion. As soon as the BDR rebels opened fire on the BDR-Army officers, they fell down on the floor. Afterwards, when the situation became calm and quite, he lay on the drain attached to the Darbar Hall. Therefrom, he informed his wife of his whereabout. After 15/20 minutes some BDR rebels

In cross examination on behalf of Sepoy Razibul and Sepoy Shahadat, he stated that he came to BDR Headquarters in the previous night of the occurrence in order to see rehearsal of Tattoo show. Till then it was not within his knowledge that meeting in the Darbar Hall would be held at 9:00 a.m. For the practice for parade two retired honorary Captains were brought. He did not actually know whether BDR members or NCOs or JCOs would participate in the practice. He took his respective seat in the last part of second line. He denied the suggestion that for the convenience of fleeing away after the occurrence, he took his seat in the last part of the last line. He further stated that at one stage of the occurrence all the BDR members left the Darbar Hall. He then stated that he could not remember whether there was any screen on the glass of the Darbar. The I.O of the case did not want to know about his phone number. He tried his best to talk with his commander over phone but did not connect him. On that time he did not inform anyone of the cantonment of the incident. The duty of the Runer is to provide assistance to his officers. The washroom is about 30 yards away from the sitting place. The drain is 16 inches wide. He remained in the drain one sided vertically. He denied the suggestion that it was not possible on his part to conceal himself in the drain. He also denied the suggestion that there was a slab over the drain. There was a frame of table over the drain. There were as many as 4/5 basins in the washroom. He and Major Maksumul Hakim took shelter under the different basins located side by side. It is possible to stay in a vacant place of a basin.

In cross-examination on behalf of Sepoy Shazzad Hosen, he stated that the kitchen room is situated beside the washroom. A passage goes along washroom and kitchen room. His dress became blood stained. He did not handover the blood stained garments to the I.O.  He did not make any conversation with anyone over the stage. The washroom and kitchen room are attached with the Darbar Hall. One can go to the washroom from the Darbar Hall opening a door only. There is no corridor in front of the washroom. A toilet is situated after a washroom. There is no urinary attached to the basin. The door of the Darbar Hall was

opened. It is not a fact that one has to go to the south side coming out from the washroom. The roof over the washroom is comparatively low than the roof of the Darbar Hall. It is not a fact that the upper roof is attached to the wall. It is also not a fact that the basins are situated in the western side of the kitchen. It is not a fact that the kitchen room is separated from the Darbar Hall. The washroom stands beside the toilet and the kitchen. To the southern side of the kitchen, there is a way of exit. The back side of the Darbar Hall indicates the east side. The sewerage drain is adjacent  to the Darbar Hall. He does not know the names of all the soldiers. He does not know how many Sazzad is there in his battalion. He did not tell about the batch number of Sazzad to the I.O. He identified him watching his photography. He denied the suggestion that he implicated this accused in this case at the

instruction of others. He denied the suggestion that the kitchen room is not visible from the washroom. He denied the suggestion that he did not go to the washroom. He also denied the suggestion that he did not come out through the window. He denied the suggestion that the BDR rebels did not enter into the Darbar Hall or he did not see anyone being armed with weapons. He denied the suggestion that there is ceiling at the Darbar Hall. He denied the suggestion that the ceiling is nine feet away from the roof of the Darbar Hall. He denied the suggestion that none else died at the Darbar Hall. He stated that one person was killed at the washroom and the another at the drain. He denied the suggestion that he participated in the killings following BDR mutiny. He denied the suggestion that he did not hear the name of Sazzad. He stated that he saw Sazzad to kill officers by opening fire on them. He denied the suggestion that he deposed against this accused falsely.

In the cross-examination on behalf of sepoy Rubel, he stated that he gave statements to the I.O at noon for about an hour. The I.O recordsed the statements and typed in the computer as well. The I.O recordsed the statements for about 30/40 minutes and the same was typed then and there. At the time of occurrence, he was in service at 13 Battalion. He denied the suggestion that Rubel was not happened to meet with him. He did not know whether accused Rubel was runner of a DAD. He denied the suggestion that Rubel was not present at the time of occurrence. He denied the suggestion that he did not see any officers to enter into the kitchen room. He denied the suggestion that he deposed falsely against this accused.

In cross-examination on behalf of Sepoy Zia, he stated that on the very day of occurrence, he stayed in the ways of Darbar Hall from 9:00 a.m to 9:15 a.m. He remained in the washroom from about 9:15 a.m to 11:15 a.m and in the drain from about 12:00 p.m to 12:30 p.m. He denied the suggestion that it was not possible on his part to see the Darbar Hall form the washroom. At the time of occurrence, he saw Zia with arms having a name-plate on his uniform and identified him. In the month of February, he saw Zia at 44 Battalion. He did not have direct conversation with Zia. He denied the suggestion that he did not identify accused Zia or that at the time of occurrence, he was not present. The drain is situated in the east side of the washroom. There is a drain around the Darbar Hall. The depth of the drain is about 3 feet and his whole body was inside the drain. Both of them remained in the drain side by side. He did not receive any bullet injury in his body. He got DA (daily allowance) for 10 days. He denied the suggestion that they were dissatisfied. He denied the suggestion that he had a conflict with Major Maksumul. He did not know of the dissatisfaction over money derived from Dal-Vhat programme. He denied the suggestion that the killings were committed by the cross fire of both the parties. He denied the suggestion that he participated in the killings. As they were unarmed, they could not resist the situation. He does not know the name of the soldier who uttered the name of Sepoy Zia. He denied the suggestion that he did not see anything remaining in the drain. While he was in drain there was a rolling carpet on him. He did not identify Sepoy Zia at the video footage. He denied the suggestion that whip knew that he was there in the drain. It is not a fact that

In cross-examination on behalf of accused Shahidul, he denied the suggestion that Shahidul was in service in 26 Battalion. He also denied the suggestion that the accused was in duty at Baipak. He did not know whether the accused was arrested by RAB at Nawabgonj on 26.02.2009. He denied the suggestion that he deposed falsely against the accused.

In cross-examination on behalf of accused Moin (absconded), he stated that Sepoy Moin was not in service under him. He does not know how many Main is there in service. He denied the suggestion that he deposed falsely against him and that he did not know him.

In cross-examination on behalf of accused Kamrul (absconded), he stated that he watched TV channels. He had acquitance with accused Kamrul from a long time. He recognized the accused since he along with the accused was in service together. He denied the suggestion that he deposed falsely against the accused.

The attack at the Darbar Hall and the killing of army officers as described by  PW 9 Lieutenant Colonel Md. Maksumul Hakim have been supported and corroborated by the evidence of  PW25 Lieutenant Colonel Md. Iqbal Hassan who has stated in his evidence that on 25.02.2009, being a Major he was in service at BDR Hospital as Deputy Commander. His residence was situated at the 3rd floor of a building by name ‘Taranga’ at the BDR Hospital. On the occasion of BDR week, on 25.02.2009 he along with other Doctors went to Darbar Hall before 9:00 a.m. and took his respective seat. At 9:00 a.m. DG of BDR started meeting at Darbar Hall and told about Dal-Vhat programme. At that time a Sepoy by name Moin of 13 Battalion being armed with weapons came over the stage and pointed his arms at the DG. Subsequently, another Sepoy by name Kazal also came over the same. On such situation everybody stood up and started moving towards the western gate. He found that the officers present therein caught hold of Sepoy Moin. He found Major Aziz, Major Khalid and others at the spot. During that period of time he heard sound of firing outside the Darbar Hall. He also found DG and Colonel Gulzar standing on the stage. He also found some BDR rebels to come towards Darbar Hall opening fire. He heard Colonel Gulzar to say Sir, sent the force as early as possible otherwise

In cross-examination on behalf of Sepoy Sajjad Hossain, he stated that on 26.04.2008, he joined as Doctor of BDR Hospital at Pilkhana. There were 27 Doctors at Pilkhana Hospital. Out of those Doctors 17 Doctors were Military Officers and 10 Doctors were from the Ministry of Health. In 161 statements he stated that the persons who were inside the Darbar Hall rushed towards the western gate. He took seat in the officer’s row which was 25/30 yards away from the stage. There was a door in the southern side. The green room was situated in the eastern side of the Darbar Hal and in the southern side of the stage. The doors of the green room and the bathroom were quite separate. The bathroom is situated besides the green room. The green room is not situated in the western side. He went out from the bathroom through the ventilator and came at the kitchen. He went to the green room for once. There was no dining beside the kitchen. He took shelter beside the cooking pot available in the kitchen. He denied the suggestion that there were no such big cooking pot in the kitchen. He denied the suggestion that it is not possible to go to kitchen through the ventilator. He did not shut up the door of the bathroom. He did not try to open the door of the kitchen. He denied the suggestion that it was not mentioned whom Sajjad and his cohorts killed. Sajjad killed Colonel Jahid, Sepoy Rubel killed Colonel Reza

In the cross-examination on behalf of Sepoy Selim Reza and Sepoy Shahadat, he stated that he told before the I.O. that he is a Doctor. The I.O. recordsed his statements and the computer operator typed the same in the computer. After being composed the same was shown and read over to him. He cannot say about the excess amount of money derived from Dal-Vhat programme. He told about Selim Reza of 44 Battalion to the I.O. giving his badge number as 63907. The I.O. wrote down the necessary statements as required. During the firing DG asked to stop fire. He cannot say to whom Colonel Gulzar talked over phone. He came back again to his unit on 12.03.2009. He did not disclose anything before making any statements before the I.O. He cannot remember where he had been on 16.02.2009 and 21.04.2009. He met I.O on 26.03.2009 for the first time. The register in respect of admission of patient to the Hospital is normally maintained. On 25.02.2009 the overall administration of the Hospital was not normal. Since he was not at Pilkhana on 27.02.2009 he cannot not say what actually happened in the Hospital on that day. When he gets time he reads newspapers and watches TV. He cannot say whether on 27.02.2009 the hon'ble Home Minister sent accused Selim Reza to the Red Crescent Hospital for treatment. He cannot say whether Baishaki TV Channel aired any programme on Selim Reza. He

In the cross-examination on behalf of Sepoy Rubel Miah, he stated that he did not work with Sepoy Rubel. However, he told about his father’s name, badge number and address to the I.O. He cannot say whether the I.O. penned down his statements while speaking those before the I.O. The statements were not read over to him. The statements made by him do not contain the address of the accused. He denied the suggestion that to tell about the address of the accused before the I.O. was false. In order to save his life he hid himself behind the cooking pots. He denied the suggestion that at that time, he had no mental state to see all the things. He denied the suggestion that he did not see anything or that he deposed falsely. He stated that he told about the cooking pots found passing through the ventilator of the bathroom. There were no cooking pots at the bathroom. He denied the suggestion that he deposed falsely. He cannot say whether I.O. seized any cooking pots. He denied the suggestion that Rubel was not known to him. He stated that accused Rubel, Sajjad and Shahadat were

In cross-examination on behalf of Sepoy Kazal Ali, he stated that he told before the I.O. that he saw Sepoy Kazal of 44 Battalion coming over the stage. In front of the stage, he found so many persons coming and going. Accused Kazal was not previously known to him. He saw Kazal fleeing away from the Darbar Hall and thereafter identified him looking at the photograph. He cannot say whether the photograph of Kazal was available in the camera fitted inside the Darbar Hall. He cannot say when accused Kazal joined in BDR. He was not directly involved with the Dal-Vhat programme. He got TA for 10 days. He denied the suggestion that the alleged occurrence took place for the interest of some political groups as he was not satisfied with the TA of 10 days. He denied the suggestion that the alleged occurrence took place out of cross firing among the BDR members.  He denied the suggestion that he deposed falsely against the accused.

In cross-examination on behalf of Sepoy Sumon, he stated that he did not say whether there was a programme of games at Pilkhana on 25.02.2009. Usually, the uniforms of the BDR members bear the name of the BDR members. The name of Sepoy Sumon was written on his uniform. Lieutenant Colonel Sajjad came to their room coming through the ventilator of another bathroom. He disclosed the name and address of Sumon to the I.O. but it is upto the I.O. whether he wrote it or not. He denied the suggestion that he did not mention about the arms by which he opened fire. Accused Sumon opened fire on Lieutenant Colonel Sajjad as a result of which his brain matters came out and touched his legs. He denied the suggestion that he did not say to the I.O. that Sumon opened fire at Sajjad. He did not get any copy of 161 statements. He cannot say whether I.O. wrote to the effect that the brain matter of Lieutenant Colonel Sajjad touched his legs. The I.O. wrote down whichever he liked. He told to the I.O. that the cooking pots are made of brass. He denied the suggestion that his evidence were not correct. He denied the suggestion that he did not say about Sumon to the I.O. He denied the suggestion that he could not see anything as he kept himself hiding. He denied the suggestion that Sumon did not open any fire or that he was not Sumon of 44 Battalion. He denied the suggestion that he deposed falsely against the accused for the death of his colleagues. He denied the

In cross-examination on behalf of Sepoy Moin, an absconded accused by the State defence lawyer, he stated that he never worked with Moin. He denied the suggestion that he did not say the names and address of Moin to the I.O. He cannot say how many persons were there by name Moin. He did not remember the badge number of Moin and there might be many persons by name Moin but he specifically stated that he told about this Moin. Later on Colonel Aftab died. He denied the suggestion that this accused is not the actual Moin and that he deposed falsely against him.

With regard to the attack and killing of army officers, PW 72 Major Farzana Kalam, has testified in her evidence that in order to observe BDR week she was at the Darbar Hall on 25.02.2009. She appeared there at 8:30 a.m and at about 9:00 a.m, the meeting at the Darbar Hall was started and the DG started giving his sermons. After sometimes when he was talking about operation Dal-Vhat programme at that time a soldier being armed with weapons coming from the western side entered into the Darbar Hall and pointed arms at him. The officers over there caught hold of him. In a moment a hue and cry was started at the Darbar Hall. Many soldiers started going out through the doors and the window of the Darbar Hall. She along with some officers came towards the stage when firings were started in and around the Darbar Hall. She, Lieutenant Colonel Dr. Lutfor Rahman, Lieutenant Colonel Rabi Rahman, Lieutenant Colonel Yeasmin and Major Roksana were there at the same place. In order to save themselves they took shelter behind the screen of the stage at the south-west corner

As far as the attack at the Darbar Hall and in other places of Pilkhana and killing the army officers, PW 73 Colonel Yasmin, has stated in her evidence that on 01.03.2005 she joined in BDR Hospital as pathologist and was in service till 25.02.2009. On 25.02.2009 at about 9:00 a.m, she along with her colleagues namely Major Roksana, Major Farzana, Lieutenant Colonel Lutfor, Major Ani and doctor Majhar went to the Darbar Hall to attend the meeting and took their respective seat thereat. The meeting at the Darbar Hall was started at 9:00 a.m, in the morning. When the meeting was going on at about 9:30 a.m, a BDR soldier being armed with weapons entered into Darbar Hall from the south-east corner and pointed arms at the DG. On that moment, the BDR soldiers seated over there started running here and there and started making a hue and cry. While she was going out from the Darbar Hall she heard an announcement to come back to the Darbar Hall. As a result, she along with Major Farzana and Major Roksana went back to the Darbar Hall. An that time intermittent firings were going on outside the Darbar Hall. When she came to the stage she found a BDR soldier lying on the stage, who actually came to attack the DG, BDR. She came to know that the name of the said BDR soldier is Moin of 13 Battalion. At the

As regards the attack at the Darbar Hall and the other places of Pilkhana and killing of the army officers, PW 77 Major Roksana Khanom, has stated in her evidence that she joined in the BDR Hospital as pathologist on 03.09.2007. On 25.02.2009, in order to participate in the meeting at the Darbar Hall she along with her colleagues went to the Darbar Hall at 8:45 a.m through the microbus and took their respective seats. At 9:30 a.m a BDR soldier being armed with weapons entered into the Darbar Hall. The name of that Sepoy is Moin. Subsequently, Sepoy Kazal also entered into the Darbar Hall. The officers over there disarmed Sepoy Moin as a result of which the other BDR soldiers stood up and started feeling away from the Darbar Hall. She was coming out from the Darbar Hall, she stayed there at the order of the DG. She along with Lieutenant Colonel Yeasmin, Major Farzana also stayed thereat. After 5/7 minutes getting sound of firings from the northern side she became frightened and went to the stage at the call of DG and hid themselves beside the screen. At 10:30 a.m the BDR rebels entered into the Darbar Hall opening fire thereat. One of the BDR rebels directed them to surrender making announcement by a hand mike. All of them raising hands started getting down from the stage. In front of the stage she found 10/15 BDR

With respect to attack at the official residence of DG BDR by the BDR rebels, PW 40 Havildar Md. Babul Miah, has stated in his evidence that on 25.02.2009 at about 7:00 a.m. he was on duty as guard commander at the Bungalow of DG. On that day he took over charge of duty from guard commander Havildar Rezaul. As many as 13 guards namely Naik Hasmat, Naik Sanaullah, L/Naik Mostafa, Sepoy Arshad, Sepoy Zia, Sepoy Mobin, Sepoy Mostafa, Masum, Sumon, Zafar, Kamrul, Hafiz and Monju were also on duty with him. He appointed guards at the 3 posts of the DG Bungalow and guarded it up to 8:00 a.m. The DG of BDR went out of the house through Government vehicle. At 8:00 a.m, DG of BDR went towards the Darbar Hall and 9:30 a.m, he heard sound of firing from Darbar Hall and alerted the guard in that regard. He tried to make communication with Lieutenant Colonel Shams, commanding officer of 44 Battalion over telephone but failed. Subsequently Sepoy Selim Reza, Sepoy Obaidul, Sepoy Ibrahim, Sepoy Altaf, Sepoy Habib, Sepoy Shahin, Sepoy Mohasin, Havildar Jashim and 10/15 BDR rebels came at the DG Bungalow. He obstructed them from entering into DG Bungalow as a result of which Sepoy Selim Reza opened fire at him causing grievous injury in his left hip. Receiving injury he fell

As per evidence led by the prosecution and confessional statements made by the accused, the places in which the army officers were mercilessly killed are as follows:-

Place No. 1: Darbar Hall and Darbar Hall area:   In the aforesaid places, on 25.02.2009 Major General Shakil Ahmed, DG BDR, Brigadier General MA Bari, DDG, Colonel Anis, Director Operation and Training (DOT), Lieutenant Colonel Enshad Ibn Amin, Commanding Officer (CO) Rifle Security Unit (RSU), Lieutenant Colonel Md. Badrul Huda, Commanding Officer (CO) of 13 Rifles Battalion Dhaka and many other officers were brutally and barbarously killed by the BDR rebels. From the evidence of PW 72 Major

Farzana Kalam, PW 73 Colonel Yasmin, PW 77 Major Rokhsana Khanom and PW 9 Lieutenant Colonel Md. Maksudul Haque  and from the confessional statement of  Sepoy Selim Reza CS accused No.6 and Sepoy Md. Habibur Rahman CS accused No.26, It appears that on 25.02.2009 at around 9:30 a.m, when the DG BDR was delivering his speech on different matters including DAl-Vhat Programme, one BDR soldier namely Sepoy Moin of 13 Rifle Battalion being armed with weapon entered the Darbar Hall. Following Sepoy Moin, another BDR soldiers namely Sepoy Kazol of 44 Rifle Battalion with arms entered the Darbar Hall. Sepoy Moin pointed arms at DG but the officers present over there disarmed him. At that time Sepoy Kazol went out of the Darbar Hall through the southern gate of the Darbar Hall opening a fire. At that time one of the BDR soldiers made a shouting saying ‘Jago’ as result of which all the BDR soldiers stood up and a chaotic and disordered situation was arisen therein. On that situation, DG BDR tried to control the situation and directed the BDR officers and soldiers to remain seated and wanted to hear their speeches, but the BDR soldiers ignoring the order of DG started leaving the Darbar Hall. At that point of time, DG directed the concerned commanders to control the troops of their respective units. On getting order of DG some of the officers went out of the Darbar Hall with a view to controlling the troops. In the midst of aforesaid situation, the intermittent firings in and around the Darbar Hall were started. On that situation, at the instruction of DG BDR, one group of the officers took shelter behind the screen at the south-east corner of the stage while another group of the officers took

Lieutenant Colonel Robi Rahman were found and

recovered from the mass grave (Gono Kobor) near

mortuary of BDR hospital on 27.02.2009. The dead

body of Major Saleh was found and recovered from

near MT garage of Pilkhana on 27.02.2009.

The aforesaid evidence of assaulting and killing

has been described in the evidence of PW 72 Major

Farzana Kalam who has stated in her evidence as

follows:-

         25/2/09 Zvs Avwg wcjLvbvq Aew¯’Z wewWAvi mßvn

Dcj‡¶  wWwR,  wewWAvi  Gi  `iev‡i  Dcw¯ Z’  wQjvg|  .............

`iev‡ii n‡ji Av‡k cv‡k †Mvjv¸wj ïi“ n‡j Avwg †jt K‡Y©j Wvt

jyrdzi ingvb, †jt K‡Y©j iwe ingvb, †jt K‡Y©j Bqvmwgb,†gRi

†ivLmvbv GK mv‡_ wQjvg| Avgiv g‡Âi wcQ‡bi c`©vi `w¶Y cye©

†Kv‡b c`©vi Avov‡j AvZ¥i¶vi Rb¨ `vovB| g‡Âi Aci cv‡k¦© c`©vi

Avov‡j wWwR, wWwWwR, wWIwU, K¨v‡Þb gvRnvi, †jt K‡Yj © Kvgi“¾vgvb, †K›`ªxq my‡e`vi †gRi mn AviI A‡b‡K wQj| evw‡ ni

†Mvjv¸wji AvIqvR evo‡Z _v‡K| we‡`ªvnxiv Avgv‡`i c`©vi Avovj

†_‡K †ei n‡q Avmvi wb‡`©k †`q| H mgq †jt K‡Y©j jyrdi ingv‡bi civg‡k© `w¶b cye© †Kv‡b hviv wQjvg Zviv G‡K G‡K †ei

n‡q Avwm| Stage †_‡K bvgvi ci ciB GK`j mk¯¿ ˆmwbK

Avgv‡`i a‡i †d‡j| †U‡b wnP‡o `ievi nj †_‡K †ei K‡i| `ievi

n‡ji gvSvgvwS Avm‡j mk¯¿ ˆmwbKiv †jt K‡Y©j Kvqmvi‡K ¸wj K‡i| †jt K‡Y©j jyrdi‡K gvi‡avi K‡i| Zviv Avgv‡`i `ievi n‡ji

DËi cwðg †MBU w`‡q †ei K‡i| evwn‡i G‡b Avgv‡`i MvwjMvjvR I

gvi‡avi K‡i| †KD †KD Avgv‡`i †PvL †e‡a dvqvwis Squad G wb‡q

†h‡Z ˆZix n‡j H mgq mk¯¿ wmcvnx †mwjg †iRv †mLv‡b Av‡m Ges

e‡j Giv gwnjv Wv³vi, G‡`i gvwim bv| Giv GLb Avgv‡`i wPwKrmv

†bqvi Kv‡R jvM‡e| wVK H mgq `ievi n‡ji wfZi †_‡K †gRi

mv‡jn †K ¸wj we× Ae¯ v’ q †ei n‡q Avm‡Z †`wL| GKwU wcK Avc

G‡m _vg‡j mk¯¿ ˆmwbKiv Avgv‡Kmn †jt K‡Y©j Bqvmwgb I †gRi †ivKmvbv‡K wcKAv‡ci wcQ‡b DVvq| †jt K‡Y©j iwe ingvb Mvox‡Z

DVvi †Póv Ki‡j mk¯¿ ˆmwbKiv Zv‡K Mvox‡Z DV‡Z †`q bv| Mvox †Q‡o †`qvi cye© gyû‡Z© wZwb Mvox‡Z DV‡Z m¶g n‡j wKQy`yi hvIqvi c‡i mk¯¿ ˆmwbKiv ivB‡d‡ji evU w`‡q AvNvZ K‡i Mvox †_‡K bvwg‡q †`q| wcKAvcwU nvmcvZv‡j Av‡m| Zviv Avgv‡`i bvwg‡q †`q|

The aforesaid evidence of  PW 72 has been corroborated and supported by  PW 73 Colonel

Yasmin who has stated in her evidence as under:-

     25/2/09 Zvs AvbygvwbK mKvj †cŠ‡b 9.00 Uvq Avgvi mnKgx©

†gRi †ivLmvbv, †gRi dviRvbv, Lieutenant Colonel jyrdi,

†gRi A¨vwb I Wv³vi gvRnvimn `ievi n‡j wWwR `iev‡i attend

Ki‡Z hvB Ges h_v¯’v‡b Avmb MÖnb Kwi|..................wWwR g‡nv`‡qi wb‡`©kµ‡g Avwg †gRi dviRvbv I †gRi †ivLvmvbmn AviI K‡qKRb Awdmvi g‡Âi `w¶Y cye© †Kv‡b c`©vi Avov‡j AvkÖq †bB| Ab¨vb¨ †ek K‡qKRb Awdmvi g‡Âi DËi cye© †Kv‡b c`©vi Avov‡j AvkÖq †bb| †gvevB‡j Avwg Avgvi ¯^vgx I gv mn Ab¨vb¨ AvZ¥xq ¯^R‡bi mv‡_ †hvMv‡hvM Kwi| wWwR g‡nv`q †gvevB‡j mvnvh¨

†P‡q DשZb Kg©KZ©v‡`i mv‡_ K_v e‡jb| mKvj A ygvb 10.30 NwUKvq A¯¿avix wewWAvi ˆmwbKiv ¸wj Ki‡Z Ki‡Z `ievi n‡j cÖ‡ek K‡i| n¨vÛ gvBK †hv‡M Zviv Avgv‡`i mevB‡K `iev‡ii evB‡i †h‡Z e‡j| Avgiv Lady doctor iv AviI Wv³vi mn nvZ

DPz K‡i †ei n‡q Avwm| g †_‡K Ab¨vb¨ AwdmviivI gv‡V †b‡g Av‡m| wmcvnx †mwjg 44 ivB‡dj e¨vUvwjqb Avgv‡`i w`‡K A¯¿ ZvK K‡i `ievi n‡ji evB‡i wb‡q †h‡Z _v‡K| wVK ZLbB Aci GKwU we‡`ªvnx MÖ“c Avgv‡`i MwZ‡iva K‡i| Avgv‡`i ï‡q co‡Z e‡j I i¨vsK e¨vR Ly‡j †dj‡Z e‡j| Avgiv ï‡q cwo| wVK H g‚ûZ ‡© GKRb ˆmwbK Lieutenant Colonel Kvqmvi‡K ¸wj K‡i nZ¨v

K‡i| Zviv Avevi Avgv‡`i D‡V `vov‡Z e‡j| Avgiv DV‡j `ievi

n‡ji evB‡i wb‡q Av‡m| `ievi n‡ji evB‡i Iiv Avgv‡`i jvBb K‡i

`vo Kivq Ges A¯¿ nv‡Z wb‡q ¸wj Ki‡Z D‡`¨vM †bq| Zv‡`i g‡a¨ GKRb Lieutenant Colonel jyrdi Gi †c‡U jvw_ gvi‡j wZwb

mn Avgiv 3 Rb Lady doctor gvwU‡Z c‡o hvB| we‡`ªvnx‡`i g‡a¨ GKRb †gRi Rvwn‡`i ivB‡d‡ji evU w`‡q †Pvqv‡j AvNvZ K‡i| †gRi Rvwn` I †gRi †ivLmvbv‡K eyU w`‡q jvw_ w`‡q w`‡Z Ges ivB‡d‡ji evU w`‡q AvNvZ Ki‡Z _v‡K| †mB mgq wmcvnx Iqvwn`,

XvKv †mK&Ui Avgv‡`i D‡V `vov‡Z e‡j| Avgiv D‡V `vov‡j †m Avgv‡`i GKwU wcKAv‡c DV‡Z e‡j| Avwg mn †gRi †ivLmvbv I †gRi dviRvbv wcK Av‡c DwV| 2 Rb cyi“l Wv³vi‡K Iiv evav

cÖ`vb K‡i I wcK Av‡c DV‡Z †`qwb| wcK Av‡c 3 Rb A¯¿avix ˆmwbK wQj| wcK Av‡c 3 wU ¸wji ev· wQj| Gi g‡a¨ wcK AvcwU

†Q‡o w`‡j K‡Y©j iwe wcK Av‡c D‡V c‡o| wcK AvcwU wKQy`yi hvIqvi ci ˆmwbKiv K‡Y©j iwe‡K Pjš— wcK Avc †_‡K ivB‡d‡ji

evU w`‡q AvNvZ K‡i †d‡j †`q| wmcvnx Iqvwn` A¯¿mn Avgv‡`i

wcK Av‡c wQj| †m nvmcvZv‡j Avgv‡`i bvwg‡q †`q|

The aforesaid evidence of killing stands

supported and corroborated by the evidence of PW 77

BA-100624 Major Rukhsana Khanam who has

stated in her evidence as under:- MZ 25/2/09 Zvwi‡L wWwR

Gi `iev‡i †hvM`v‡bi Rb¨ 8-45 wgt nvmcvZvj †_‡K iIqvbv nB gvB‡µvevm‡hv‡M Ab¨ mnKvix‡`i ms‡M| wbw`©ó ¯’v‡b Avmb MÖnb Kwi| 9-30 wgt GKRb mk¯¿ ‰mwbK `ievi n‡j cÖ‡ek K‡i| Zvi

bvg wmcvnx gvBbDwÏb| Zvic‡i wmcvnx KvRj cÖ‡ek K‡i| wmcvnx

gvBb‡K Awdmviiv wbi¯¿ K‡i| ˆmwbKiv ZLb `vwo‡q hvq I cvjv‡Z

_v‡K| Avwg `ievi nj †_‡K †ei nIqvi cÖv°v‡j wWwR Av‡`‡k `ievi  n‡j  †_‡K  hvB|  Avgvi  ms‡M  †jt  Kt  Bqvmgxb,  †gRi dviRvbv †_‡K hvb| 5/7 wgwbU c‡i DËi w`K †_‡K ¸wji kã †c‡q

fxZ  n‡q  hvB  I  wWwR  Gi  Avnev‡b  g‡Â  DwV  c`©vi  Avov‡j

1

AvZ¥‡Mvcb Kwi| 102 Uvi mgq mk¯¿ we‡`ªvnxiv ¸wj Ki‡Z Ki‡Z

`ievi n‡j cÖ‡ek K‡i| GKRb n¨vÛ gvB‡K Avgv‡`i AvZ¥mgc©‡bi wb‡`©k †`q| Avgviv nvZ DPz K‡i †_‡K †b‡g Avwm| g‡Âi mvg‡b 10/15 Rb mk¯¿ we‡`ªvnx‡K †`L‡Z cvB| G‡`i g‡a¨ A¯¿ I †gMv‡dvb nv‡Z wmcvnx †mwjg †iRv‡K †`L‡Z cvB| †m A¯¿ ZvK K‡i Avgv‡`i †ei n‡q hvIqvi Av‡`k †`q| Ab¨ GKUv we‡`ªvnx MÖ“c G‡m Avgv‡`i e¨vP Lyj‡Z e‡j I ï‡q †h‡Z e‡j gvwU‡Z ïqv ev’ q GKRb we‡`ªvnx †jt Kt Kvqmvi‡K ¸wj K‡i nZ¨v K‡i| wmcvnx †mwjg †iRvi wb‡`©‡k Avgiv D‡V `vovB Ges †m Avgv‡K `ievi n‡ji cwðg †MU w`‡q †ei K‡i †`q| evB‡i _vKv we‡`ªvnxiv Avgv‡`i jvBb

K‡i `vo Kivq Zv‡`i GKRb †jt Kt jyrd‡ii †c‡U jvw_ gvi‡j

jyrdi mn Avgiv 3 Rb gwnjv Wv³vi gvwU‡Z c‡i hvB| Aci GKRb we‡`ªvnx †gRi Rvwn`‡K jvw_ †g‡i †d‡j †`q| Zv‡K cÖPÛ gviai

K‡i| wmcvnx Iqv‡n`yj XvKv †mKU‡ii wb‡`©‡k D‡V `vovB| †m Avgv‡`i GKwU Pickup G DV‡Z eva¨ K‡i| Pickup G 3 Rb

A¯¿avix wQj I 3 ev· ¸wj wQj| †jt Kt jyrdi KvRx iwe ingvb I

†gRi Rvwn`‡K Pickup G DV‡Z †`qbv| Pickup †Q‡o w`‡j †jt

Kt KvRx iwe Pickup G jvd w`‡q D‡V c‡ib| Zv‡K A¯¿avixiv †d‡j †`q| wmcvnx Iqv‡n‡`i †bZ…‡Z¡ Pickup Uv Avgv‡`i nmwcUv‡j Av‡b I I wU †Z P‡j †h‡Z eva¨ K‡i|

In this regard  PW 9 Lieutenant Colone Md.

Maksudul Haque has stated in his evidence as

follows:-

25/2/09 Zvwi‡L mKvj 8.40 wgt DG  Gi `iev‡i Ask

MÖn‡bi Rb¨ `ievi n‡j Dcw¯ Z’ nB| mKvj 9 Uvq `ievi ïi“ nq|

DG `ievi ïi “ K‡ib| Kzkjvw` wewbgq K‡ib DG | mKvj Abygvb 9.30  wgt DG e‡jb Wvjfv‡Zi jf¨vs‡ki UvKv Awdmvi  I

ˆmwbK‡`i Kj¨vb Znex‡j Rgv Kiv n‡e| DG g‡nv`‡qi e³‡e¨i

GK ch©v‡q wmcvnx gBb 13 ivB‡dj e¨vUwjqb A¯¿ nv‡Z `ievi n‡j cÖ‡ek K‡i| †m DG Gi w`‡K A¯¿ ZvK K‡i& Zvici wmcvnx KvRj 44 e¨vUvwjqb `ievi n‡j cÖ‡ek K‡i| DDG, DG Gi evg cv‡k

emv wQ‡jb| wZwb wmcvnx gBb‡K a‡i †d‡jb Ab¨ Awdmviiv gBb‡K wbi¯¿ K‡i| wmcvnx gBb †ó‡R c‡i hvq| Avwg GKRb Medical

†Kv‡ii Awdmvi‡K gB‡bi mv‡U©i eyZvg Lyj‡Z †`wL| H mg qwmcvnx KvRj `ievi nj Z¨vM K‡i| Avwg Gi c‡i GKwU ¸wji AvIqvR ïwb

Ges BDR m`m¨‡`i GKRb ÒRv‡MvÓ e‡j PxrKvi K‡i| ZLb `ievi n‡j wek„sLjvi m„wó nq Ges †ek wKQz ˆmwbK `vwo‡q hvq| DG  e‡jb Avcbviv Pzc Ki“b Avwg Avcbv‡`i K_v ïb‡ev| ZLb wKQy BDR m`m¨ `ievi nj Z¨vM Ki‡Z _v‡K| DG e‡jb Avcbviv

`ievi nj Z¨vM Ki‡eb bv| ˆmwbKiv `ª“Z `ievi nj Z¨vM Ki‡Z

_v‡K| ‰mwbKiv n‡ji `iRv Rvbvjv †f‡½ nj Z¨vM K‡i| Avwg ZLb

`ievi n‡ji evB‡i ¸wji kã ïwb| ¸wji AvIqvR µ‡gB evo‡Z

_v‡K| DG mKj Awdmvi‡`i‡K wbR wbR ˆmwbK‡`i wbqš¿b Ki‡Z

e‡jb|  GK ch©v‡q wmwbqi AwdmviMb DG mv‡ne‡K †÷‡Ri wcQ‡b

wb‡q Avkªq MÖnb K‡i| `ievi n‡j ¸wj Avm‡Z _vK‡j mK‡j ï‡q

c‡i| c‡i `ievi nj cÖvq dvKv n‡q hvq| Avwg †÷‡R c`©vi Avov‡j

jywK‡q †_‡K cwiw¯ w’ Z ch©‡e¶b Kwi| nVvr 10/15 Rb BDR Gi

mk¯¿ we‡`ªvnx `ievi n‡j Xy‡K G‡jvcv_vix ¸wj Ki‡Z _K v‡| wewfbœ RvqMvq jywK‡q _vKv Awdmvi‡`i gv_vi Dci nvZ Zz‡j †ei n‡q Avm‡Z e‡j| Zv‡`i Av‡`‡k A‡b‡KB †ei n‡q Avm‡Z _v‡K| Awdmvi‡`i 10/15 R‡bi GKwU `j‡K gv_vi Dci nvZ Zz‡j `ievi

nj †_‡K A‡¯¿i gy‡L †ei K‡i wb‡q hvq| wKQz¶b ci `iev in‡ji

evB‡i cÖPÛ ¸jv¸wji kã ïwb|

With regard to the killing of the aforesaid army

officers,  PW 8 BA-4397 Lieutenant Colonel Md

Zahid Hasan has stated in his evidence as follows:-

..........25/2/09 mKv‡j `ievi n‡ji D‡Ï‡k¨ iIqvbv ‡`B

Officer’s Mess †_‡K| mKvj 9 NwUKvq `ievi ïi“ nq| Abygvb 9.30 wgt wmcvnx gBb Stage G D‡V gnvcwiPvjK‡K A¯¿ ZvK K‡i|

ZLb K‡qKRb Awdmvi gBb‡K wbi¯¿ K‡i| wmcvnx gvCb gvwU‡Z

c‡o hvq| ZLb BDR m`m¨iv wew¶ßfv‡e Pvjv‡div K‡i| ZLb

DG  mv‡ne mevB‡K `iev‡i emvi Rb¨ Avnevb K‡ib| hvi hvi Awab¯—‡`i wbqš¿‡bi wb‡`©k †`b| mKvj Abygvb 9.35 wgwb‡U Avwg ¸wji kã ïb‡Z cvB| Ab¨vb¨ BDR m`m¨‡K `ievi n‡ji w`‡K A¯¿

wb‡q Avm‡Z †`wL Awdmvi‡`i nZ¨vi D‡Ï‡k¨| DG  mevB‡K kvš—

n‡q A¯¿ †i‡L `iev‡i Avm‡Z e‡jb Zv‡`i mKj `vex `vIqv gvbv

n‡e e‡j Rvbvb| ZLb `ievi n‡j AbM©j ¸wj nq| ZLb Director

K‡Y©j AvwbQ kvš— _vK‡Z †Nvlbv †`q wKš‘ ˆmwb‡Kiv kvš— nq bvB I ¸wj el©b Ki‡Z _v‡K| Avgiv gnvcwiPvjK kvwKj weª‡MwWqvi †Rbv‡ij evix, 4 Rb cwiPvjK Aci †m±i KgvÛvi 7/8 Rb †jt

K‡Y©j c`vwZK Awdmvi 15/16 Rb †gRi c`ex Awdmvi 2 Rb gwnjv Wv³vi Ges 2 Rb ‡jd‡Ub¨v›U c`vwZK Awdmvi 2 Rb Bgvg 2 Rb my‡e`vi †gRi 40/50 Rb `ievi n‡j AvUwK‡q cwo| BwZ ga ‡¨ DG

†dv‡b mvnvh¨ Pvb mKvj 10.15 wgt wmcvnx †mwjg †iRv mn 4/5 Rb

BDR m`m¨ mn †gMv‡dvb wb‡q A¯¿ mn D‡ËwRZ Ae¯ v’ q `ievi n‡j cÖ‡ek K‡i| wmcvnx †mwjg †iRv †gMv‡dv‡b Avgv‡`i †ei n‡Z e‡j

I AvZ¥mgc©‡bi wb‡`©k †`b KvD‡K wKQz Kiv n‡e bv g‡g© †Nvlbv †`b| Avgiv ZLb 15/20 Rb †ei n‡q Avwm Avgv‡`i nvZ DPz Kivi

wb‡`©k †`q | H mgq `ievi n‡j evB‡i 20/25 Rb ˆmwbK‡K `ievi

nj †NivI K‡i ivL‡Z †`wL| wmcvnx †mwjg †iRv Avgv‡K jvBb cwRk‡b †h‡Z e‡jb Avgiv mvg‡bi ‡g‡S‡Z ï‡q cwo| wmcvnx †mwjg †iRv, wmcvnx Beªvwng wmcvnx nvwee I wmcvnx iwdKzj wmcvnx Avwe`yj I nvi“byi iwk` 2 Rb 24 ivB‡dj Avgv‡`i Dci ¸wj el©b

K‡i| H ¸wj‡Z †jt K‡b©j Kvqmv‡ii Mjvq ¸wjwe× nq| m‡½

AviI 2 Rb ¸wj we× nq| Zv‡`i g‡a¨ ‡gRi AvwRRyj nvwKg I

†gRi iwdK, Avwg †jt K‡Y©j Kvqmv‡ii Wvb cv‡k ï‡qwQjvg| Zv‡K

¸wjwe× †`‡L `vwo‡q cwo, Zv‡K DVv‡bvi †Póv Kwi| Avgv‡K †`‡L 2

Rb Awdmvi `vwo‡q c‡i Zv‡`i bvg ‡jt K‡Y©j iwe, I ‡jt K‡Y©

jyrdi| Avgiv 6 R‡b wg‡j †jt K‡Y©j Kvqmvi‡K DVvB, Zv‡K `ievi

n‡ji evB‡i wb‡q Avwm| BDR m`m¨iv Avgv‡`i evav †`q| ¸wjwe× Awdmvi‡`i nvmcvZv‡j wb‡Z †`q bvB| Avgiv cybivq A‡¯¿i gy‡L

`ievi n‡j XyK‡Z eva¨ nB ‡jt K‡Y©j Kvqmvi‡K †i‡L| `ievi n‡j

2Rb Awdmvi‡K †g‡S‡Z c‡o _vK‡Z †`wL| Ab¨vb¨ Awdmvi‡`i‡K

†ei n‡Z mvwie× `vov‡Z †`wL| Avgv‡K H jvB‡b `vov‡Z e‡j| Avwg

DAG  ‡gRi mv‡j‡ni wcQ‡b jvB‡bi `vovB | `iRv w`‡q †ei nIqvi mgq †gRi mv‡jn †c‡U ¸wjwe× nq| Zv‡K bv gvivi Rb¨

Abybq webq K‡ib| Zv m‡Z¡I Zv‡K †U‡b †nP‡o ‡ei K‡i †bq ‰mwbKiv| Avgv‡K GKRb A¯¿avix ˆmwbK Avgv‡K Kjvi †P‡c a‡i I Avgvi †gvevBj wb‡q †bq †gvevBj b¤^i 01711883372 †m Avgvi

i¨vsK Ly‡j †dj‡Z e‡j| i¨vsK Ly‡j †m Avgvi †PvL †e ‡† ad‡j|

†PvL evavi Av‡M 2 Rb gwnjv Wv³vi‡K nvUz ‡M‡o e‡m _vK Z †`wL, ZLb ch©š— Ab¨vb¨ BDR m`m¨ Dcw¯ Z’ wQj| Lye KvQ †_‡K ¸wji kã †c‡q Avwg ï‡q cwo| ZLb GKRb ˆmwbK e‡j I Òg‡iwb gviÓ|

ZLb A¯¿avix ‰mwbK Avgvi †Pvqv‡j ivB‡dj w`qv AvNvZ K‡i I 2wU nvZ †f‡½ †`q| Avwg †Pv‡L evav Kvco Ly‡j †`L‡Z cvB  2Rb Wv³vi‡K A‡¯¿i gy‡L Mvoxi wcQ‡b DVv‡bv n‡”Q| wcK Avc wU †Q‡o hvIqvi g~û‡Z© †gRi wgRvb‡K †`Š‡o Pickup G DV‡Z ‡`wL| GKRb ˆmwbK Avgv‡K SvcwU‡q a‡i| Avgvi †Pvqv‡ji `vZ 2 fvM n‡q †M‡Q eyS‡Z cvwi| ZLb H ˆmwbK 50/60 MR `y‡i GKUv N‡i AvUwK‡q

iv‡L| Avgvi †PvL Ly‡j †`wL Avwg 5 bs †M‡Ui MvW©i“‡i g ev_i“‡g| H ‰mwbK evBi †_‡K Avgv‡K AvUwK‡q ¯ v’ b Z¨vM K‡i| Avwg ev_i“‡gi Rvbvjvi duvK w`‡q †`wL `ievi cÖavb `iRvq 1Uv

Mvox ivLv Av‡Q| iv¯—vi Dc‡i Pickup PjvPj KiwQj| Avwg c PÖ Û

¸wji kã cvB| Abygvb 11.25 wgt GKRb BDR m`m¨ ev_i“‡gi

evB‡i †_‡K G‡m gv_vi †nj‡gU Ly‡j A¯¿ bx‡P †i‡L †gveB vj G PÆMÖv‡gi AvÂwjK fvlvq e‡j DG †K Avgiv †g‡i Avmjvg 1Uv ¸wj

Kivi c‡iI `uvov‡bv wQj c‡i AviI 2Uv ¸wj K‡iwQ| c‡i1 2Uvq

AviI GKRb BDR m`m¨‡K Mobile †dv‡b Rvbv‡Z ïwb †h DG

Gi evmfe‡b hviv cÖ‡ek K‡iwQj Zviv DG g¨vWvg‡K mvBR K‡i‡Q

Mnbv I kvox wb‡q †M‡Q| Abygvb 12 Uvi mgq H MvW© i“‡gi Dc‡i

fvwi A¯¿ ivLvi kã cvB I †gwkb Mvb, gUvi Pvjv‡bvi †mj‡di Dc‡i

DVvi Rb¨ WvKvWvwK K‡i| Gi g‡a¨ GKRb A P C- (Armer

Personal Carrier) Gi Dc‡i BDR I GjvKvevmxi D‡Ï‡k¨

e³„Zv w`‡Z ïwb Ges e‡j Avgv‡`i GB Av‡›`vjb wKQy msLK ¨ BDwbdg©avix mš¿vmx‡`i wei“‡× Ges hviv `ybxwZ©evR| GjvKvevmx‡K

Avnevb K‡i mvnv‡h¨i Rb¨| mš¿vmx‡`i gy‡Lvm D‡¤§vP‡b iK_v e‡j| BDR ‡`i A¯¿ †Mvjvevi“` †ndvR‡Z ivL‡Z e‡j| †mbvevwnbx Avµgb Ki‡j cÖwZnZ Ki‡eb| †mbvevwnbx I Avgv‡`i GKB A¯¿| GjvKvevmx Avgv‡`i mv‡_ Av‡Q| †mbvevwnbx Avmvi c~‡eA © vgv‡`i mZK© Ki“b| Abygvb we‡Kj ‡cŠ‡b 5Uvq 2Rb BDR m`m¨

ev_i“‡g bK K‡i I `iRv †Lv‡j †`q| Avwg wfZi †_‡K wQUKvwb

Ly‡j †`B I †`wL 2 RbN CO,  GKRb nvwej`vi I 1Rb j¨vÝt

bv‡qK| Avgvi cwiPq Rvb‡Z Pvq I we¯—vwiZ ï‡b Avgvi NUbv| ZLb GKRb nvwej`vi e‡j Avcbvi A‡bK nvqvZ ZvB †e‡P †M‡Qb| `ievi nj †_‡K †KD evP‡Z cv‡i bvB Zviv Avgv‡K wfZi w`‡q `iRv

eÜ K‡i ivL‡Z e‡j| Avwg nvmvcvZv‡j †h‡Z PvB, e‡j hvIqv m¤¢e

bv| wcQb w`‡q ¸wj Ki‡e GLb ˆmwbK Av‡Q| Avgv‡K e‡j Avcwb _v‡Kb †`wL KZ¶b evwP‡q ivL‡Z cvwi| GB e‡j Zviv 2 Rb-B H RvqMv Z¨vM K‡i| 10 wgwbU ci 5Rb BDR m`m¨ evwni †_‡K

`iRv †Rv‡i av°v ‡`q I Lyj‡Z e‡j Avwg `iRv Lyj‡j 3Rb Avgv‡K

¸wj Ki‡Z DÏZ nq GB wZbRb n‡”Q wmcvnx Avj gvgyb, wmcvnx

AvwbQ, 2 RbB 44 ivB‡dj e¨vUvwjqb I 36 e¨vUvwjqb wmcnx Kvgi“j| GB 3 Rb‡K Aci 2 Rb evav ‡`q I e‡j ïb‡Z †`|

Zv‡`i‡K me NUbv ewj| 3 Rb Avgv‡K euvwP‡q ivLvi c‡¶wQ j bv 2

Rb Avgv‡K gvi‡Z evav †`q| H 3 Rb †mbvevwnbx‡K D‡Ïk¨ K‡i MvjvMvwj K‡i| BwZg‡a¨ c~‡e©i nvwej`vi Dcw¯ Z’ nq I G‡m kvš—

Kivi †Póv K‡i| 3 R‡b D”P ¯^‡i nvwej`vi‡K Mvwj †`q| GKRb

ˆmwbK Avgvi nv‡Z _vKv †gvevBj wQwb‡q †bq| e¨vw³MZ Mobile

b¤^i 01712014990 | c‡i Rvwb H wmcvnxi bvg cjUb PvKgv| GKUz c‡i Avgvi I/D Card I nvZ Nwo wdwi‡q †`q| iv‡Z gvB‡K

ïb‡Z cvB gvbbxq ¯^ivóªgš¿x wcjLvbvq cÖ‡ek Ki‡eb I we‡`ªvnx‡`i

ms‡M Av‡jvPbv Ki‡eb| BDR iv A¯¿mgc©b Ki‡Z wb‡la K‡i|

26/2/09 mKvj ‡cŠ‡b 6 Uvq gvB‡K e‡j †mbvevwnbx Avµgb Ki‡Z

cv‡i cÖ¯ Z‘ _v‡Kb| mKvj ‡cŠ‡b 10 Uvq Avgv‡K ev_i“g †_‡K †ei

K‡i Pickup Gi wcQ‡b DVvq Ges e‡j †mbvevwnbx G‡m‡Q Avcbv‡K wb‡q hv‡e| mKvj 10 Uvq †K›`ªxq †KvqvU©vi MvW© K‡q`x †m‡j Avgv‡K AvUK K‡i| Avwg ‡mLv‡b Awdmvi I cwievi‡K †`L‡Z cvB| 3 Uvi

mgq ‡iW wµ‡m›U Gi D×vi Kgx©iv wcjLvbvq cÖ‡ek K‡iI gwnjv I

wkï‡`i wb‡q hvq| ‡cŠ‡b 4 Uvi mgq Gg.wc †Mvjvg †iRv †KvqvU©vi

Mv‡W© Dcw¯’Z nb, mKj NUbv ï‡b KvM‡R wj‡L †bb| ZLb wZwb e‡jb DAD ‡ZŠwn‡`i AbygwZ Qvov Avcbv‡K Qvov n‡e bv| wZwb AbygwZ msMÖ‡ni Rb¨ P‡j hvb| wKQz¶b c‡i †diZ Av‡mb | Abyg b

4.15 wgt Avgv‡K †KvqvU©vi MvW© †_‡K 4 bs †M‡U Av‡bb| BDR m`m¨iv †MU Lyj‡Z A¯^xKvi K‡i| ZLb DAD †ZŠwn‡`i

AbygwZ ï‡b †MU Ly‡j †`b| Avgiv 4 bs †MU w`‡q †ei n‡q Avwm|

50/60 MR Avmvi c‡i †MU †_‡K Avgv‡`i Dci ¸wj el©b K‡i ZLb

†`Šo w`‡q mevB ¯ v’ b Z¨vM K‡i| Avgv‡K 2 Rb DGFI Gi Awdmvi

Zvnv‡`i Car G DVvq I Avgv‡K City K‡j‡Ri mvg‡b Av‡b| Avwg

¯¿xi m‡½ †hvMv‡hvM Kwi| we‡Kj 6Uvq XvKv CMH G wPwKrmvi Rb¨

fwZ© nB| GK gv‡mi AwaK wPwKrmvaxb wQjvg|

With regard to the killing of the aforesaid army officers,  PW 3 BA-2255 Lieutenant Colonel Md Abu Tasnim has stated in his evidence as follows:-

...........25-2-09 Zvwi‡L wW.wR g‡nv`q `iev‡i wQ‡jb `ievi

n‡j| `ievi ïi“ nIqvi 4/5 wgwbU c~‡e© `ievi n‡j †cŠw, Q ZLb

Abygvb 8.55 wgt n‡e| mKvj 9.00 NwUKvq `ievi ïi“ nq| wWwR

g‡nv`q e³e¨ ‡`Iqvi mgq 9-30 wgwb‡U 1 Rb wmcvnx ivbv œ N‡ii

`iRv w`‡q cÖ‡ek K‡i| †m Stage  G G‡m wWwR eivei A¯¿ ZvK K‡i| c‡i Stage G Dcw¯ Z’ wWwR g‡nv`q I K‡qKRb Awdmvi H ‰mwbK‡K a‡i †d‡j| ZLb ˆn‰P ïi“ nq| Avwg Stage Gi w`‡K

GwM‡q hvB ZLb Ab¨ GKRb ˆmwbK A¯¿ mn †`Šo †`q| †gRi iv‡k`

H ‰mwbK‡K aivi Rb¨ avIqv K‡i| c‡i Avwg Rvb‡Z cvwi Stage ‡h D‡VwQj Zvi bvg ˆmwbK gvCb, †h ‰mwbK cvjvBqv hvq Zvi bvg KvRj| K‡Y©j AvwbQ ZLb `ievi ïi“ n‡e e‡j mevB‡K Avm‡Z

e‡j| H mgq Avwg `ievi nj †_‡K †ei n‡q 5 bs †M‡Ui KvQvKvwQ

hvB| ZLb †gRi gKeyj I †gRi Kvgi“j Dcw¯ Z’ wQ‡jb| Avgiv ˆmwbK‡`i `ievi n‡j †dir Avm‡Z Aby‡iva KiwQjvg| Avw g†`L‡Z

cvB `ievi n‡j DËi cwðg †Kv‡b gv‡Vi Dci 3/4 Rb ˆmwbK `vwo‡q Av‡Q A¯¿ mn| ïb‡Z †cjvg ZvovZvwo †NivI K‡iv GKRb I

†hb ‡ei n‡Z bv cv‡i| 1Uv Pickup `ievi n‡ji w`‡K Avm‡Z

†`wL| Avwg ZvovZvwo `ievi n‡ji w`‡K AMÖmi nB| H mgq †gRi gKeyj Ges †gRi Mv¾vjx ILv‡b `uvwo‡q wQj| Avwg ZvovZwo v `ievi n‡j cÖ‡ek Kwi| `ievi n‡j ZLb cÖPzi ˆn ˆP nw”Qj| `ievi

n‡j I gv‡V dvqvwis nw”Qj| Avwg wWwR mv‡ne †K ewj We are encircled. DG mv‡ne wb‡`©k †`b take care of troops. Avwg

wb‡`©k †c‡q `ievi nj †_‡K †ei nB Ges Signal Sector  Gi

D‡Ï‡k¨ iIqvbv †`B| hvevi mgq †`L‡Z cvB exi DËg b~i† gvnv¤§`

¯‹z‡ji Kv‡Q †dvqvivi cv‡k GKwU Pickup Mvox `vwo‡q Av‡Q| 2/3

Rb ˆmwbK A¯¿ mn Mvox †_‡K †b‡g‡Q| Signal Sector  hvIqvi

c‡_ Swimming Pool Gi Kv‡Q †gRi gKeyj I †gRi Mv¾vjxi

m‡½ †`Lv nq| Zviv Avgv‡K e‡j Sir Rank Ly‡j †djyb| Avwg Lywj

bvB| Zvici Zviv 2 Rb P‡j hvq| Avwg JCO’s Mess Gi KvQvKvwQ hvB| ZLb †gRi Mv¾vjx‡K 6/7 Rb ˆmwbK wcUv‡”Q †`wL| Avwg ZLb `vjv‡bi cv‡k jywK‡q hvB| ZLb Avwg wPrKvi ïwb I ¸wji kã cvB| GKUz ci Avwg †ei nB ZLb bv‡qK my‡e`vi dRjyj

Kwig, nvwej`vi AvwbQz¾vgvb, bv‡qK Iqv‡R`, ˆmwbK gwZDi ingvb

mn Av‡iv wKQz ˆmwbK A¯¿ mn Qvjvi Dci Mv¾vjx mv‡n‡ei g„Z †`n wb‡q hv‡”Q| ZLb wKQz ˆmwbK †`Šwo‡q G‡m e‡j 36 I 13 e¨vUvwjq‡b †KvZ (A¯¿vMvi) †f‡½ †djv n‡q‡Q GB e‡j Zviv P‡j

hvq| 2Rb J.C.O G‡m Avgv‡K Zv‡`i †g‡m wb‡q hvq| Avwg J.C.O

‡g‡m wKQz¶b Ae¯ v’ b Kwi| c‡i H †g‡mi wfZ‡i Avwmqv Avgvi gv_vq A¯¿ a‡i e‡j Av‡iKUv‡K †c‡qwQ †K †Kv_vq AvwmQ Avq| 7/8

Rb ˆmwbK Avgv‡K †NivI K‡i wcUv‡bv ïi“ Ki‡jv| Avgv‡K gvi‡Z

gvi‡Z RSB `vjv‡bi Kv‡Q wb‡q hvq| ZLb j¨vÝ bv‡qK †iRvDj I

3/4 Rb ˆmwbK G‡m Avgv‡K jvB‡b wb‡q †Mj| 26-2-09 D×vi nIqv ch©š— Avwg ILv‡bB wQjvg| wewfbœ mgq Avwg †gvevB‡j K‡Y©j Avwid, K‡Y©j gwkDi, †gRi Zv‡iK I my‡e`vi †gRi Avbv Qixi m‡½

K_v ewj| Rvb‡Z cvwi DAD ‡ZŠwn`, DAD nvwee, DAD bvwmi,

DAD Rwjj I DAD iwng mn 14 m`‡m¨i `j gvbbxq cÖavbgwš i¿

m‡½ mv¶vr K‡i‡Q| BDR  we‡`ªvn I nZ¨vKv‡Ûi K_v cÖKvk K‡i bvB| 26-2-09 Zvwi‡L mܨv 5 Uvq Avgv‡K D×v‡ii ci wgicyi

†mbvwbev‡m †bIqv nq| c‡i Avwg evmvq Mgb Kwi| †mLv‡bAvgvi ¯¿xi m‡½ mv¶vr nq Ges Rvb‡Z cvwi Zv‡`i we‡`ªvnxiv †KvqvU©vi Mv‡W© e›`x K‡i †i‡LwQj I Avgvi miKvix evmv BDR Gi wfZ‡i we‡`ªvnxiv jyU K‡i| c‡i cwÎKv TV gva¨‡g Ab¨ Awdmvi‡`i gva¨‡g Rvb‡Z cvwi DAD  ‡ZŠwn`, DAD  bvwmi, DAD  nvwee, DAD

iwng, nvwej`vi iwdK, ˆmwbK gwbi“¾vgvb, ˆmwbK †mwjg †iRv I ˆmwbK gwbi, DAD Rwjj mK‡j cÖavb gš¿xi m‡½ mv¶vr K‡i‡Q I †mLv‡b nZ¨vKv‡Ûi K_v cÖKvk K‡i bvB| cieZ©x‡Z Avgvi †gvevBjUv ˆmwbK wRj−y‡ii k¦ï‡ii evmvq Zvi ¯¿x Pvqbv †eM‡gi KQ v †_‡K D×vi nq|

With regard to the killing of the aforesaid army officers, PW4 BA-3012 Colonel Md Shamsul Alam Chowdhury has stated in his evidence as follows:-

Avwg eZ©gv‡b National Security intelligence G Kg©iZ|

MZ 1-2-09 †_‡K 11-3-09 ch©š— Avwg wcjLvbvq 44 e¨vUvwjq‡bi AwabvqK wnmv‡e Kg©iZ wQjvg|.............25-2-09 Zvwi‡L

wcjLvbvi `ievi n‡ji mvR m¾v I †givgZ e¨e¯ v’ cbvi `vwqZ¡ 44

ivB‡d‡ji Dc‡i b¨v¯— wQj| H w`b we‡Kj 15.30 wgt n‡Z cvMjv

wRg Lvbvi `vwqZ¡ 44 ivB‡dj e¨v‡Uwj‡q‡bi Dci b¨v¯— wQj| BwZc~‡e© 24-2-09 Zvwi‡LB DR mßvn Dcj‡¶ drill Kiv‡bvi

`vwqZ¡ Avgvi I 24 ivB‡dj e¨vUvwjq‡bi AwabvqK ‡jt K‡Y©j knx`

jyrd‡ii Dci b¨v¯— wQj| 24-2-09 Zvwi‡L BDR  mßvn Dcj‡¶

wcjLvbv‡Z gvbbxq cÖavbgš¿xi AvMgb Dcj‡¶ Avgv‡K gvbbxq cÖavbgš¿xi cÖavb wbivcËv Kg©KZ©v wnmv‡e `vwqZ¡ †`Iqv nq| Avwg Avjv−ni †g‡nievbx‡Z D³ `vwqZ¡ mwVKfv‡e m¤úbœ Kwi| 25-2-09 Zvwi‡L mKvj 08 NwUKvq Avwg `ievi n‡ji e¨ve¯ v’ cK wnmv‡e `ievi

n‡j AvMgb Kwi| `ievi n‡ji mvwe©K Z`viwK m¤úbœ c~e©Kˆm wbK‡`i

emvi e¨e¯ v’ cbv Ges cyi¯‹vi weZi‡bi mvwe©K e¨ve¯ v’ m¤úbœ Kwi|

mKvj Abygvb 9 NwUKvq cweÎ †Kvivb †Z‡jvqv‡Zi gva¨‡g 25-2-09 ZvwiL `ievi ïi“ nq| DG mv‡n‡ei `iev‡i e³e¨ cÖ`vb ïi“

K‡ib| wZwb wKQz¶b e³e¨ †`Iqvi GK ch©v‡q Wvj fvZ Kg©m~Pxi Dc‡i we¯ v—wiZ Av‡jvPbv ïi“ K‡ib| Avwg ZLb Awdmvi‡`i emvi

2q mvwi‡Z 3q †Pqv‡i emv wQjvg| DG g‡nv`q mK‡ji D‡Ï‡k¨

e‡jb †h, Avcbviv wK H e¨vcv‡i me eyS‡Z †c‡i‡Qb ZLb ˆmwb‡Ki

Reve Avkvbyi“c bv nIqvq wZwb c~bivq Wvjfv‡Zi Dci      w¯ e—

vwiZ e³e¨ ïi“ K‡ib| GK ch©v‡q wZwb e‡jb Wvjfv‡Zi DׄZ A_© ev jf¨vsk BDR Gi Kj¨v‡b e¨vq Kiv n‡e| ZLb DG g‡nv`‡qi

evg cv‡k¦© n‡Z I `ievi n‡ji `w¶b cye© †Kvbv n‡Z GKRb ˆmwb

A¯¿ wb‡q DG g‡nv`‡qi w`‡K †`Š‡o Avm‡Z _v‡K| Avwg ZLb PxrKvi K‡i ai ai Ki‡Z Ki‡Z †÷‡Ri w`‡K †`Šwo‡q hvB| mv‡_

mv‡_ knx` K‡Y©j gywRe, K‡Y©j AvwbQ I K‡Y©j Gjvnx m nAv‡iv A‡b‡K †÷‡R D‡V c‡ob| BwZ g‡a¨ H ˆmwbK DG g‡nv`‡qi gv_vi evgcv‡k¦© ivB‡d‡ji e¨v‡ij jvwM‡q †d‡j‡Q| H †Q‡jUv‡K ZLb †L e

bvf v© m g‡b nw”Qj Avwg GwM‡q wM‡q 13 ivB‡d‡ji e¨vUvwjq‡bi D³ ˆmwbK gvBb‡K a‡i †dwj Ges GK SUKvq A‡¯¿i e¨v‡ij wd« K‡i †dwj| †mB g~û‡Z© †÷‡R Dcw¯ Z’ weªt †Rbv‡ij evix (whwb GB NUbvq wbnZ) knx` K‡Y©j AvwbQ, knx` K¨vc‡Ub gvbœvb, knx` ‡jt K‡Y©j Gjvnx mn AviI wKQy Awdmvi gvBb‡K cvKovI K‡i †÷‡R †d‡j

†`q| Avwg ZLb DG g‡nv`q‡K `ievi †_‡K P‡j †h‡Z Aby‡iva Kwi| DG g‡nv`q e‡jb `ievi n‡e| †Zvgiv Troops Control

Ki| †mB g~û‡Z© †÷R †_‡K wb‡P †b‡g Avwm Ges Troops  ‡`i

wbqš¿b Kivi †Póv Ki‡Z _vwK| ZLb `ievi n‡ji cwðg `iRvi w`K

†_‡K GK ivDÛ dvqv‡ii AvIqvR ïb‡Z cvwi| Gi ci AviI K‡qK

ivDÛ ¸wji kã cvB| BwZg‡a¨ `ievi nj †_‡K BZ¯ Z— wew¶ß

Ae¯ v’ q †h hvi gZ cvjv‡Z ïi“ K‡i‡Q Avwg dvqvi Kiv ‰mwbK‡`i Zvov Ki‡Z ewj Ges wb‡RI Zvov Kwi| †m gyû‡Z© `ievi n‡ji DËi cv‡k¦©i gv‡V Avwg 6/7 Rb BDR ‰mwbK‡K †eë Uzcx Qvov wew¶ßfv‡e NyivNywi Ki‡Z †`wL| †mB g~û‡Z© `iev‡ii wfZ‡i Dcw¯’Z Awdmv‡iiv wKsKZ©e¨ weg~p n‡q hvB Ges JCO iv wKQz eyS‡Z cviwQj bv| Avwg DG mv‡n‡ei Kv‡Q Stage G P‡j Avwm| Avwg ZLb K‡Y©j AvwbQ mn Ab¨vb¨ Awdmvi‡`i‡K DG g‡nv`q‡K Mvwo‡Z K‡i wb‡q †h‡Z Aby‡iva Kwi| AvwgD G mv‡ne‡K P‡j †h‡Z Aby‡iva Ki‡Z _vwK| DG mv‡n‡ei MvoxwU ZL‡bv `uvo Kiv‡bv wQj|D G g‡nv`q

ZLb Av‡`k †`b †Zvgiv †Zvgv‡`i Troops Control Ki Ges

Zv‡`i‡K wfZ‡i Avb| `ievi n‡e| Avwg ZLb Stage †_‡K wb‡P

†b‡g hvB| Awdmviiv QzUvQzwU Ki‡Q †KD †KD RU cvwK‡q Av‡jvPbv Ki‡Q| Avwg Zv‡`i ewj DG  g‡nv`q Troops Control K‡i

wfZ‡i Avb‡Z e‡j‡Qb| Avwg DG wb‡`©k cvj‡bi R‡b¨ Troops

†`i wfZ‡i Avbq‡bi j‡¶ cÖavb dUK w`‡q evB‡i †h‡Z _vwK `ievi

nj ZLb Lvwj n‡q †M‡Q| Avwg hvevi mgq Avgvi wcQz wcQz LT. K‡Y©j Gbv‡qZ AwabvqK 36 e¨v‡Uwjqb, ‡gRi kvn‡bIqvR, †gRi ûgvqyb, †gRi mv‡jn I †gRi knx` mn AviI wKQz Awdmvi‡K Avgv‡K Abymib Ki‡Z †`wL| hvevi mgq `ievi n‡ji Dcw¯ Z’ JCO

‡`i Avwg wb‡`©k †`B Troops Control Ki‡Z| Avgvi wb‡`©k gZ

Avgvi BDwb‡Ui my‡e`vi wgivR my‡e`vi BmgvBj, bvt e m` yvi ‡ mvB`yj

mn AviI A‡b‡K evB‡i hvb| `ievi n‡ji  evB‡i †h‡q Avwg Troops K‡›Uªvj Kivi †Póv Ki‡Z _vwK| Troops  ‡`i wewfbœ

RvqMvq `vwo‡q _vK‡Z †`wL| Avwg eo As‡ki mvg‡b wQjvg| GUv `ievi n‡ji `w¶b cv‡k¦©i iv¯ v—i cv‡k¦©| Avwg Dcw¯ Z’ ‰mwbK‡`i eySv‡bvi †Póv KiwQjvg †h D”Q„sLjvi gva¨‡g mgm¨vi mgvavb nq bv| †Zvgiv DG g‡nv`‡qi I Awdmvi‡`i †i‡L †Kv_vq hvI †Zvgiv `iev‡i †diZ Pj  Ges ‡Zvgv‡`i `vwe _vK‡j Avgiv Av‡jvPbvi

gva¨‡g mgvavb Ki‡Z cvie| ˆmwbK‡`i ZLb wm×vš n—xbZvq fyM‡Z †`‡LwQ| Giv mevB `iev‡i AskMÖnbiZ mvavib ˆmwbK| PZzw`©‡K ZLb Fire nw”Qj Ges ˆn ‰P nw”Qj| Avgvi K_v nqZ †kvbv hvw”Qj bv| ˆmwbKiv ZLb Avgv‡K ïbvi †Póv KiwQj| †m g~û‡Z© Avgvi g‡b n‡qwQj `iev‡i ˆmwbKiv  †diZ Avm‡Z Pv‡”Q|  cv‡k  Av‡iv wKQz Awdmvi‡`i  †`‡LwQjvg| Troops  Control  Kivi  †Póv  Ki‡Z|

ZLb Avgvi Wvb cv‡k¦© wcQb †_‡K 4/5 Rb nvwej`vi I bv‡qK c`exi  ‰mwbK Av‡m  Ges wPrKvi K‡i e‡j DwbI  44  Gi CO DwbI‡Zv Army Officer Dbviv GK Rv‡Zi Ges †Kvb DcKvi

Ki‡e  bv|  13  ivB‡d‡ji  hviv  AvwQm  Zviv  Pj  e¨vUvwjq‡b|

e¨vUvwjq‡b wM‡q wm×vš— †be| ZLb Avgvi mvg‡b cÖvq 1/11 nvRvi

2

ˆmwbK wQj| Zv‡`i wb‡`©k g‡Z GKUv weivU Ask 13 ivB‡d‡j P‡j †h‡Z _v‡K| ZLb Avgvi cv‡k A‡bK JCO Dcw¯ Z’ wQj| †mLv‡b wmMb¨vj †m±‡i my‡e`vi †gRiS M AvjgvQ exi cÖwZK‡K ewj Avcwb

Zv‡`i‡K K‡›Uªvj K‡ib I †diZ Av‡bb| wKš‘ Troops  P‡j †h‡Z

_v‡K| ZLb Avgvi mvg‡b †_‡K nvwej`vi ev‡qRx` D¾vgvb I bv‡qK

`wjj wPrKvi K‡i e‡j 36 G hviv AvwQm ZvivI P‡j Avq| Zv‡`i

wb‡`©k gZ nvwej`vi Kv‡kg, †jvKgvb, dvi“K †kL knx` j¨vt bv‡qK

ev‡iK I j¨vt bv‡qK kvgxg mn Aci GKwU Ask Avgvi mvg‡b †_‡K

P‡j hvq H mgq wPrKvi K‡i e‡j Pj hvB †Kv‡Z (A¯¿vMvi) hvB| †Kv‡Z wM‡q e¨ve¯ v’ wbe| †mB g~û‡Z© Avgvi evg cv‡k¦© c wQ‡b 36 e¨vUvwjq‡b AwabvqK knx` ‡jt K‡Y©j Gbv‡qZ I knx` K‡Y©j gywRe‡K †`wL| Avwg K‡Y©j Gbv‡qZ‡K ewj Avcbvi ˆmwbKivI P‡j hv‡”Q| wZwb ZLb Zvi ˆmwbK‡`i ej‡Z _v‡K †Zvgiv †Kv_vq hvI †Zvgv‡`i `vex _vK‡j Avgv‡K ej GB ej‡Z K‡Y©j Gbv‡qZ Zvi ˆmwbK‡`i Abymib K‡i| ZLb Avgvi mvg‡b 3/4 kZK ˆmwbK wQj| Avwg Zv‡`i‡K `iev‡i Avbvi †Póv KiwQjvg| GK ch©v‡q Avwg `ievi

n‡j Dcw¯ Z’ DG  Ges Ab¨ Awdmvi‡`i Ae¯ v’ Rvbvi Rb¨ `ievi

n‡j AMÖmi n‡Z _vwK| ZLb `ievi n‡ji evB‡i 10/12 Rb we¶zä ˆmwbK‡K mk¯¿ Ae¯ v’ q NyivNywi Ki‡Z †`wL| Avwg Zv‡`i g‡a¨ 44 e¨v‡Uwjq‡bi wmcvnx †mwjg †iRv ( Zvi GK nv‡Z A¯¿ Ab¨ nv‡Z †gMv ‡dvb wQj), wmcvnx Ievq`yj Ges wmcvnx iwdKzj‡K wPb‡Z cvwi| ZLb 5 bs †M‡Ui w`K †_‡K K‡qKRb‡K eªvk dvqvi Ki‡Z Ki‡Z Avgv‡`i w`‡K Avm‡Z †`wL| ZLb Dcw¯ Z’ mK‡jB ‡`Šov †`Šwo ïi“ K‡i| Avgv‡K JCO iv av°v‡Z _v‡K, Avgvi wbKU¯’ JCO †KvqvU©v‡ii cÖvPx‡ii cv‡k¦© Avkªq †bB| ZLb Avgiv Ae¯v’ b †_‡K 10-

12 MR `y‡i GKRb ˆmwbK‡K `ievi nj j¶ K‡i ¸wj Pvjv‡Z† `wL

†m ZLb wPrKvi K‡i e‡j Avgiv Awdmvi‡`i PvB Zviv Kv‡iv eÜz

bq| me dvqv‡ii j¶¨ wQj `ievi nj| JCO iv Avgv‡K wN‡i †d‡j

†KD GKRb Avgvi gyL †P‡c a‡i Avgvi Rank Ly‡j †d‡j nvZ Nwo

wQ‡o †`q, Avgv‡K wbKU¯’ evmvi w`‡K av°v‡Z _v‡K| Avwg ZLb ewj P‡jb Awd‡m hvB, ZLb BDR  Gi GKwU cyivZb Pickup Mvox

iv¯ v—i cv‡k¦© ˆmwbK‡`i cv‡k¦© Ae¯ v’ b ‡bq| Pickup Gi wcQ‡b

15/16 Uv ev Zvi †ekx ¸wji ev· wQj| Gi g‡a¨ 3/4 Uv evK ª & ‡Lvjv

wQj| G‡`i g‡a¨ wK¬‡c jvMv‡bv ¸wj wQj| ‰mb¨‡`i H ¸wj w`‡Z †`wL| Pickup Gi wcQb †_‡K `yB Rb mk¯¿ ˆmwbK SMG mn jvd

w`‡q bv‡g Ges `ievi nj j¶¨ K‡i ¸wj K‡i| ZLb GKRb J.C.O

e‡j mgq †kl G‡`i wbqš¿b Kiv m¤¢e bv| Ab¨ Rb Avgv‡K e‡j

Avcbvi eqm Kg A‡bK wKQz †`‡Lbwb G‡`i Avi wbqš¿b Kiv m¤ e¢

bv| ZLb J.C.O †KvqvU©v‡i 3 Zvjvq Avgv‡K wb‡q hvq J.C.Oiv|

Avwg evmvq XyKvi mgq †KD †KD wb‡P †b‡g Av‡m I my‡e`i v BmgvBj, my‡e`vi wmivR, bvt my‡e`vi mvB`yj I bvt my‡v ei ` iwng I

nvwej`vi RvwKi Avgvi mvg‡b wQj| Avwg ZLb BDwbdg© cwiwnZ| Avwg 3 Zvjvq Xy‡K Rvbvjv w`‡q evwn‡ii Ae¯ v’ b †`wL|` i vi n‡j

`w¶b cv‡k 20/22 Rb mk¯¿ ˆmwbK ¸wj KiwQj| `ievi n‡ji

wfZ‡i ZLb jvMvZvi ¸wji kã cvB| Avwg ZLb Amnvq n‡q cwo|

Avjv−n Zvqvjvi mvnvh¨ cÖv_©Yv Kwi| ZLb `ievi n‡ji w`K †_‡K

GKRb my‡e`vi †mw`bD AD c‡` c`vbœwZ cvevi K_v wQj †m iv¯ v—

cvi nIqvi mgq 2 Rb BDR wmcvnxi mv‡_ K_v KvUv KvwU nw”Qj|

GK ch©v‡q H ˆmwb‡Kiv DAD  ‡K ¸wj K‡i| wZwb ZLb iv¯ v—q

jywU‡q c‡ob| Gi 5/7 wgwbU c‡i †gRi kvn‡bIqvR‡K nvZ Dc‡i

Zz‡j 3 Rb ˆmwbK wcQ‡b A¯¿ a‡i 5 bs †M‡Ui w`‡K wb‡qh vw”Qj|

wKQz `yi hvIqvi c‡i ¸wji kã cvB| Gi wKQz¶‡bi g‡a¨B †gRi

mv‡jn‡K nvZ Dc‡i Zz‡j 3 Rb ‰mwbK A¯¿ ZvK K‡i 5 bs †M‡Ui w`‡K wb‡q hvq, wKQz¶b c‡i ¸wji kã cvB| Avwg ZLb nZvk n‡q cwo| `ievi n‡ji wfZ‡i I evB‡i ¸wji AvIqvR cvB | Avgvi

mv‡_ _vKv JCOiv Zv‡`i g‡a¨ Av‡jvPbv K‡ib Avgv‡K †eWi“‡g

wb‡q Av‡m| JCOiv Zviv Avgv‡K mv`v cvRvgv cvÄvwg ci‡Z †`q| Avgvi ID Card Mobile  nvZNwo e¨vR me wb‡q hvq| Avgv‡K cv‡ki i“‡g wb‡q Av‡m I e· Lv‡Ui cvUvZb Zz‡j Gi wfZi XyKv‡Z Pvq| Avwg Zv‡`i ewj hLb `iKvi nq ZLb XyKe| ZLb †KD G‡m

av°v w`‡j my‡e`vi BmgvB‡ji ¯¿x `iRvq wM‡q e‡j wZwb GKv Av‡Qb| c‡i Avgv‡K Kv‡jv wR‡Ýi cÖ¨v›U I Kv‡jv ‡MwÄ ci‡Z †`q| Avwg wRÁvmv Kwi mgq KZ ZLb e‡j mgq 11.35 wgt| ZLb `ievi

n‡ji `w¶b cv‡k© cÖPzi BDR ˆmwbK mk¯¿ Ae¯’v‡b wQj| APC

(Armur Personal Carrier) I Pickup Mvwo‡Z †c‡Uªvwjs Pj‡Z _v‡K| GKUv Pickup G gvBwKs nq | Pickup Gi wcQ‡b †jLv wQj

m`i| H Pickup I gvBwKs K‡i ejwQj BDR Gi `vex gvb‡Z n‡e

Avwg© Awdmviiv †`‡ki I Zv‡`i kΓ | Avwg© wN‡i †i‡L‡Q Avµgb

Ki‡Z cv‡i Ggb K_v gvBwKs nwPQj| †Kvb Awdmvi‡K evP‡Z †`Iqv hv‡e bv| Zviv Qq gvm hy× Ki‡Z cvi‡e g‡g© ‰mwbK‡`i Avk^¯’ KiwQj| evmvq Ae¯’vbiZ ‰mwbK I JCO †`i iv¯—vq †b‡g we‡`ªvnx‡`i m‡½ GKwÎZ n‡Z AvnŸvb KiwQj| G Ae¯ v’ q Avgvi mv‡_ _vKv JCOiv e‡j m¨vi‡K evPv‡bv hv‡ebv| Ab¨ JCOiv e‡j

Avgv‡`i g„Zz¨i c‡i †hb m¨v‡ii g„Zz¨ nq| †mB g~û‡Z© g‡ vK B ïwb †nwjKÞvi †_‡K dvqvi n‡”Q, mevB‡K ‡nwjKÞvi‡K fire K Z

wb‡`©k †`q| ZLb A‡bK ˆmwbK A¯¿ nv‡Z Dc‡i †nwjKÞvi‡K fire K‡i| eû ˆmwbK ZLb ¸jv¸wj K‡i| Avwg Zv‡`i ga¨ n‡Z wmcvnx Rvwn`yj I wmcvnx ivLvj P›`ª‡K wPb‡Z cvwi| Avgvi wbR¯^ †gvevBjwU

`ievi n‡j XyKvi Av‡M Avgvi ivbvi †K †`B| H †gvevB‡jwewfbœ

bv¤^vi Save wQj| Avgvi m‡½ miKvix †h †gvevBjUv wQj H †gvevBjUv JCO  iv wb‡q †bq| JCO  BmgvB‡ji †Q‡j iv‡m‡ji

Mobile Uv †bB Ges Avgvi gv evev fvB †evb‡K NUbv H †gvevB‡j RvbvB I †`vqv Ki‡Z ewj| Avgvi †Q‡j‡K †dvb Kwi Ae¯ v’ RvbvB

Ges  SSF Gi gnvcwiPvjK weªt †Rt Avwgbxi bv¤^vi Avgvi †Q‡ji

KvQ †_‡K msMÖn Kwi| †Rbv‡ij Avwgbx‡K †dvb Kwi I NUbv RvbvB| mvnvh¨ cÖv_©bv Kwi| wZwb e‡jb e¨e¯ v’ MÖnb Kiv n‡”Q Gfv‡eB w`bUv †K‡U hvq| †mw`b we‡Kj †_‡KB 5 bs †M‡Ui w`‡K wgwQj wgwUs Pj‡Z _v‡K| mܨvi mgq gvMwi‡ei bvgv‡Ri mgq JCO mv‡ne‡`i civg‡k©

†`qvj UcwK‡q cvjv‡bvi cwiKíbv K‡iwQjvg| wKš‘ ˆmwbK‡`i Ae¯’v‡bi Kvi‡b m¤¢e nq bvB| dR‡ii bvgv‡Ri c‡i wcjLvbv †_‡K cvjv‡bvi cwiKíbv K‡i e¨_© nB| iv‡Zi †ejv my‡e`vi Bmv gB‡ji

†Q‡j iv‡mj Radio tody ïbvi ci Mobile  G evB‡ii Ae¯ v’

Rvbvq| iv‡Z GK mgq gvB‡K ïb‡Z cvB Zv‡`i cÖwZwbwa `j gvbbxq cÖavbgš¿xi Kv‡Q †M‡Qb| †mLvb †_‡K †diZ Avmvi ci cÖ‡qvRbxq e¨e¯ v’ wb‡eb| gvB‡K Ah_v ¸wj AcPq bv Kivi wb‡`©k †`qv nB‡Z

wQj| Mfxi iv‡Î gvbbxq ¯^ivóª gš¿xi AvMg‡bi Lei gvB‡K cÖPvi nw”Qj| Zv‡`i wewfbœ `vex wb‡q †¯−vMvb ‡`b I A¯¿ Z¨vM bv Kivi wb‡`©k †`b| 25-2-09 gvMwi‡ei bvgv‡Ri ci `ievi n‡ji cv‡k

jvBU eÜ n‡q hvq| evB‡ii Av‡jv‡Z wKQz †jvK‡K †`Lv hvB‡Z wQj| GKwU mv`v G¨v¤^y‡jÝ I 1UvP ickup Nb Nb `ievi n‡j hvq I

RSB Gi w`‡K hvq| Avwg ZLb Lvwj †cvkvK civ Svo `– vi‡`i `yB PvKvi gqjvi Mvwo av°v‡q I evjwZ wb‡q `ievi n‡ji w`‡K †h‡Z

†`wL| G¨v¤^y‡jÝ IP ickup `ievi n‡j Avmv hvIqvi ci cyKz‡ii cv‡k¦© gvRv‡ii Kv‡Q hvq I ‡dir Av‡m| Svo `– viiv MÖvDÛkx‡U K‡i

fvix e¯—v 13 ivB‡dj †_‡K wb‡q ‡h‡Z †`wL| ciw`b mKv‡jI GKB

Ae¯ v’ †`wL| me Mvoxi mvBU jvBU R¡jwQj †Kvb †nW jvBU R¡‡j bvB| 26-2-09 Zvwi‡L GKBfv‡e gvBwKs PjwQj BDR  Gi `vex

gvb‡Z n‡e †k−vMvb PjwQj| Av‡Mi w`‡bi GKB K_v ej‡ZwQj| gvBwKs  G  †emvgwiK  e¨vw³‡`i  ejwQj RAB  ev  †mbvevwnbx‡K mvnvh¨ bv Ki‡Z| mKvj 10 Uvq `ievi n‡ji cwðg cvk©¦ eivei

DAD ‡ZŠwn` wR›`vev` g‡g© †k−vMvb ïwb| m¤¢eZ ˆmwbKiv †kv−Mvb w`w”Qj| Avwg Rvbvjv w`‡q me †`L‡ZwQjvg| wKQz¶b c‡i DAD ‡Zvwn` Rx‡c K‡i Avgvi AvwkªZ evmvi mvg‡b Av‡m| ZLb BDR Gi ˆmwbKiv DG  ‡ZŠwn` wR›`vev` e‡j †kv−Mvb †`q| DAD ZLb

Zv‡`i m‡½ K_v e‡j P‡j hvq| †mw`b mgq 1121  †_‡K 12 Uvi w`‡K BTV  dz‡U‡R †`wL gvbbxq cÖavbgš¿x fvlb w`‡eb| ZLbM obile

Network eÜ| ZLb wKQz ˆmwbK ej‡Q BDR Gi ˆmwbKiv fvM‡Q| Avi †KD †hb bv fv‡M| 12 Uvi w`‡K 1 Uv wgwQj 5 bs MU w`‡q Xy‡K `ievi n‡ji cwðg cv‡k© eivei wM‡q ‡diZ Av‡m| wgwQ‡j A‡bK we‡`ªvnx ˆmwbK wQj e‡j g‡b n‡q‡Q| †ejv 1 21 -2 Uvq 1wU wgwQj 5

bs †MU w`qv Xy‡K I `ievi n‡ji cwðg †MU w`‡q c~bi† vqe i n‡q

hvq| wgwQ‡j g‡b n‡q‡Q A‡bK we‡`ªvnx ˆmwbK †ei n‡q †Mj| `ycyi

2/21  Uvi w`‡K 2 Rb ˆmwbK Avgvi AvwkªZ evmvq Av‡m I `iRv

2

Lyjvi Rb¨ av°v †`q| iv‡m‡ji ¯¿x gybgyb e‡j wZwb evmvq GKv| ˆmwbK 2 Rb ¸wj K‡i evmvq XyKvi ûgwK †`q GK ch©v‡q `iRv gybgyb Ly‡j †`q| ‰mwbKiv Xy‡J KC O ‡`i m‡½ ivMvwš^Z n‡q K_v

e‡j| BwZg‡a¨ iv‡mj Avgv‡K Lv‡Ui bx‡P XywK‡q †`q| ˆmwb iv e‡j Awdmvi‡`i w`‡q †`b| JCO  iv e‡jb Zviv mvivivZ evB‡i wQj mKv‡j G‡m‡Q Avevi evB‡i hv‡e| JCOiv wg_¨v e‡j Zv‡`i eySv‡bvi

†Póv K‡i| GK ch©vq ˆmwbK 2 Rb evmvq Ae¯ v’ b K‡i| GKRb JCO GKRb ˆmwb‡Ki A¯¿ †K‡o †bIqvi †Póv KiwQj| Ab¨ ˆmwbK A¯¿ ZvK K‡i I †g‡i †djvi ûgwK †`q I Awdmvi‡`i †diZ w`‡Z

e‡j| ZLb JCOiv A¯¿ †Q‡o w`‡Z eva¨ nq| ˆmwbK 2 Rb †eWi“‡g

cÖ‡ek K‡i ZLb Kjgv cowQjvg| nvwej`vi RvwKi‡K H ˆmwbKiv ivB‡dj w`qv AvNvZ K‡i| 3 Rb JCO, gybgyb iv‡mj‡K Zviv wb‡P

wb‡q hvq| Avwg ZLb †PŠwK †_‡K †ei n‡q Avwm I Avwg Uq‡j‡U Xy‡K

hvB| ZLb bv‡qK my‡e`vi iwng e‡j Uq‡jU wbivc` bv| †m Avgv‡K

cybivq †eW i“‡g wb‡q hvq| ˆmwbKiv c~bivq Dc‡i Av‡m iwng †PŠwK bx‡P Xy‡K hvq ZLb Avwg ey‡Ui kã cvB| Avwg †PŠwKi ‡P wb Avkªq †bB| GKRb JCO  e‡j gvbbxq cÖavbgš¿x mvavib ¶gv †Nvlbv K‡i‡Qb| mevB A¯¿ Rgv w`‡”Q †ZvgivI A¯¿ Rgv `vI| ˆmwbKiv e‡j

A¯¿ Rgv w`‡j Avgv‡`i wb¯—vi bvB| ˆmwbKiv bx‡P †b‡g †M‡j gybgyb

I iv‡mj Dc‡i Av‡m| nvwej`vi RvwKi‡K ¸wj Kivi g~û‡Z© †m e‡jb

†m Awdmvi bv Zvi ZvB Zviv c~bivq Avgv‡K LyR‡Z Dc‡i Av‡m| Avwg ZLb †ei n‡q Avwm| ˆmwbK 2 Rb Avevi Dc‡i Av‡m| A¯¿

Rgv †`Iqv K_v I mvavib ¶gv Kiv ejvq ˆmwbKiv bx‡P hvq| v qK

my‡e`vi mb` GKUP v ickup wb‡q Av‡m| my‡e`vi mvBdzj bx‡P †h‡Z e‡j Avgv‡K| Avwg bx‡P wM‡q Zv‡`i mk¯¿ Ae¯ v’ q †`wL| Avwg

Zv‡`i K_vgZ H Pickup G DwV| ZLb gvbbxq msm` m`m¨ †iRv

1Uv PAJERO  Mvox‡Z Av‡m Ges Awdmvi‡`i †Luv‡R| Avwg ZLb Pickup  ‡_‡K msm` m`‡m¨i Mvox‡Z DwV| Avwg ZLb fxZ wQjvg Avgv‡K 4 bs †M‡U Av‡b H Mvox‡Z c‡i Avj−vni ing‡Z i¶v cvB

GB nZ¨v KvÛ †_‡K|

With regard to the killing of the aforesaid army

officers,  PW 5 BA-3015 Lieutenant Colonel Md

Abdul Mukim Sarkar has stated in his evidence as

follows:-

.............MZ 25†k †deª“qvix, 2009 m‡b wcjLvbv `ievi

n‡j Awdmvi mvwii gvSvgvwS ¯’v‡b emv wQjvg| mKvj AvbygvwbK 9.00 Uvi mgq wbqwgZ †KviAvb †ZjvIqv‡Zi gva¨‡g `ievi ïi“ nq| `iev‡ii ïi“‡ZB wWwR g‡nv`q 2/1 wU cÖm½ D‡j−L Kivi ci

Wvj fvZ Kg©m~Px cÖm‡½ K_vevZ©v ïi“ K‡ib| wZwb e‡jbH cÖK‡í hv jvf n‡q‡Q Zvi mg¯— A_© ˆmwbK†`i †`qv n‡e| H cÖK‡í †h mg¯— ˆmwbK Ask MÖnb K‡iwb Zv‡`i‡KI b~¨bZg 10 w`‡bi wW G cÖ`vb Kiv n‡q‡Q| wZwZ e‡jb jvf †_‡K miKv‡ii cvIbv UvK cwi‡kva Kiv n‡q‡Q Ges AviI AvbygvwbK 4 †KvwU UvKv evKx Av‡Q

hv cwi‡kva Kiv n‡e| wZwb e‡jb AviI wKQz gvjvgvj Av‡Q h wewµ

Kiv n‡j cÖvß A_© wewWAvi Gi Kj¨v‡b e¨q Kiv n‡e| Gi ci wZwb

†Pviv Pvjvb cªm‡½ K_vevZ©v ïi“ K‡ib| wWwR mv‡ne AviI e‡jb

33 I 22 ivB‡dj e¨v‡Uwjqvb h_vµ‡g 1g I 2q ¯ v’ b AwaKvi K‡i‡Q| wZwb e‡jb cÖwZw`b AvbygvwbK 1‡KvwU UvKvi gvjvgvj aiv c‡o Ges cÖvq 9/10 †KvwU UvKvi gvjgvj †Lvqv hvq| Gici wWwR

mv‡ne †dvm©‡`i wbKU †_‡K mg_©b Av`v‡qi †Póv Ki‡j wZwb h‡_ó mvov cvb bv| Gi ci wZwb AviI 2/1 wU welq K_v e‡jb| AZtci

`ievi n‡ji wWwR g‡nv`‡qi evg w`‡K †_‡K wmcvnx gvBb I wmcvnx

KvRj A¯¿mn `ievi n‡ji cÖ‡ek K‡ib| wmcvnx gBb wPrKvi K‡i

Stage G D‡V Av‡m Ges wWwR g‡nv`‡qi w`‡K A¯¿ ZvK K‡i a‡i| GB chv©‡q `iev‡i Avmv ˆmwbKiv `vwo‡q hvq Ges nƇMv‡ji m„wó nq| G mgq †Mvjv ¸wji kã ïb‡Z cvB| `iev‡i n‡ji ˆmwbKiv wew¶ßfv‡e wewfbœ w`‡K QzUvQzwU ïi“ K‡i| Avwg j¶¨ Kwi `ievi n‡ji DËi w`‡K 1wU Rvbvjvi KvPu †f‡½ ˆmwbKiv †ei n‡ qhv‡”Q|

Avwg GK ch©v‡q H Rvbvjv w`‡q †ei nB I nZevK n‡q hvB| AZtci

Avwg gv‡Vi DËi w`‡K AMÖmi n‡Z _vwK Ges 2 Rb Aviwc ˆmwbK †K †`L‡Z cvB| Avwg Zv‡`i NUbvi Kvib wRÁvmv Kwi‡j Zviv †Kvb

DËi †`q bv| Avwg AviI GKUz DËi w`‡K G¸‡j †`L‡Z cvB 10/12

Rb ‰mwbK A¯¿ mn `ievi n‡ji w`‡K AMÖmi n‡”Q| Avwg Zv‡`i fvegywZ© †`‡L fq cvB Ges c~e© w`‡K †Uªwbs †k‡Wi w`‡K P‡j hvB| wKQz¶‡bi g‡a¨ †mB mg¯— A¯¿avix ‰mwbKiv G¸‡Z _vK‡j Zv‡`i g‡a¨Kvi wmcvnx L›`Kvi kvnv`vr, wmcvnx kvnxb, Ges wmcvnx mv¾v`‡K wPb‡Z cvwi| Gi ci Avwg DËi w`‡K wKQzUv AMÖmi n‡q m`i ivB‡dj e¨v‡Uwjqv‡bi c~e© w`‡K 1wU †`vZjv wewìs‡qi wbP Zjvq

†÷vi i“‡g Xy‡K cwo| †mB mgqS toreman ivav store G Dcw¯’Z

wQj| Avwg †XvKvi mv‡_ mv‡_ †m H store Gi `iRv eÜ K‡i †`q|

Gici Avgiv †mLv‡b mKvj 10.00 †_‡K 13.00 NwUKv ch š© — A‡c¶v Kwi| H mgq evB‡i cÖPÛ †Mvjv¸wj Pj‡Z _v‡K| ˆmwbK iv Avgv‡`i store Gi PZzw`©‡K gv‡Vi g‡a¨ cwRkb wb‡q _v‡K| Avwg store Gi Rvbvjv w`‡q j¶¨ Kwi 14/15 Rb A¯¿avix ˆmwbK

Avgv‡`i store Gi evivÜvq cwRkb wb‡q Av‡Q| Avwg Zv‡`i wfZi †_‡K wmcvnx myRvDj, bv‡qK myi“¾vgvb, wmcvnx AvKei †nv‡mb I wmcvnx mwdKzj Bmjvg mK‡jB m`i ivB‡dj e¨v‡Uwjqv‡bi m`m¨, Zv‡`i wPb‡Z cvwi| storeman Avgv‡K evi evi P‡j hvIqvi ZvwM`

†`q I Avgvi cwiPq Rvb‡Z PvB‡j Avwg Zv‡K 25 ivB‡dj e¨v‡Uwjqv‡bi ‰mwbK e‡j cwiPq †`B| Zvici 14.30 NwUKvi mgq storeman H store ‡Q‡o P‡j hvq Ges hvIqvi mgq Avgv‡K evB‡i †_‡K Zvjve× K‡i P‡j hvq | Avwg †mLv‡b ZLb bvgvR cwo I iw¶Z wKQz Lvevi LvB| †ejv AbygvwbK 15.30 NwUKvi mgq j¶¨ Kwi Avgvi store Gi Zvjv †Lvjv n‡”Q| 5/6 Rb ˆmwbK store Gi Zvjv

Ly‡j Avgv‡Ks tore  †_‡K †ei K‡i| Zv‡`i KviI nv‡Z A¯¿ Ges

KviI nv‡Z jvwV wQj| Zviv Avgvi cwiPq Rvb‡Z PvB‡j Avwg 25 ivB‡dj e¨v‡Uwjqv‡bi ˆmwbK cwiPq †`B| G ch©v‡q Zviv Avgv‡K

k³ K‡i †eu‡a †d‡j Ges Avgvi c‡KU †_‡K †gvevBj I gvwbe¨vM wQwb‡q †bq| H †dvbwU Avgvi Awdwmqvj †dvb wQj| Zviv Avgv‡K gviwcU Ki‡Z _v‡K Ges Avgv‡K †g‡i †djvi cwiKíbv Ki‡Z _v‡K|

Zviv ivB‡d‡ji evU w`‡q Avgvi Kvu‡a AvNvZ K‡i| ZvivA vgvi Wvb

†Pv‡L AvNvZ Ki‡j †Pv‡L RLg cÖvß nB| Zviv Avgvi evg nvUz‡Z

AvNvZ K‡i| Gfv‡e Zviv Avgv‡K gvi‡Z gvi‡Z GKwU gv‡Vi Kv‡Q

wb‡q hvq| †mLv‡b cÖPzi ˆmwbK Rgv nq| †mLv‡b †_‡K GKRb ˆmwbK Avgv‡K †U‡b jvB‡b wb‡q hvIqvi †Póv K‡i| Avi GKRb ˆmwbK Avgvi gv_vq wc¯—j †VwK‡q †U‡b wb‡q Ab¨ w`‡K hvIqvi †Póv K‡i|

AZtci Zv‡`i K‡qKRb e‡j 2/1 Rb‡K wRw¤§ ivLv cÖ‡qvRb mKj‡K

gvwim bv| GKRb e‡j Gbv‡K Øviv Statement  ‡jLv‡Z n‡e| Gi

ci Zviv Avgv‡K wewfbœ fv‡e wbh©vZb Kivi ci GKwU †MvjN‡i †PvL

†eu‡a emvq| †mLv‡b wKQz¶b Avgv‡K Zviv wewfbœ fv‡e wbhvZ©b K‡i| Zrci Avgv‡K Zviv 1wU e¨v‡Uwjq‡bi †KvqvU©vi Mv‡W©i K‡q`x †m‡j cÖ‡ek Kivq| mܨvi w`‡K Zviv KvMR Kjg wb‡q G‡m Avgvi Statement  ‡jLvi Rb¨ Pvc cÖ‡qvM K‡i| Avwg Pv‡ci gy‡L Zv‡`i K_vg‡Zv 1wU Statement wj‡L †`B| cieZ©x‡Z Rvb‡Z cvwi †h, H Statement wU Zviv wUwf‡Z cÖPv‡ii Rb¨ cvwV‡q †`q| Avgv‡K hviv AvU‡K †i‡LwQj Zv‡`i g‡a¨ †_‡K 1 R‡bi bvg wmcvnx ivwKeyj Ges

bv‡qK iwdKzj Bmjvg, 44 ivB‡dj e¨v‡Uwjqb e‡j Rvb‡Z cvwi|

ivwÎ 22.00 NwUKvq 1 Rb my‡e`vi Av‡m Ges Avgv‡K i¶vK ivi

B”Qv †cvlb K‡i| wZwb Avgv‡K †KvqvUv©i Mv‡W©i g‡a¨ Zvjv e× K‡i

iv‡Lb Ges gv‡S gv‡S Lvevi w`‡q hvb| wewfbœ mg‡q ˆmwbKiv Av‡m

Ges Avgv‡K †mLvb †_‡K a‡i wb‡q hvIqvi †Póv K‡i| c‡ii w`b

`ycyi †ejvq ˆmwbKiv A¯¿ Rgv †`q Ges mܨvi w`‡K j¶¨ Kwi K‡qK

Rb †jvK Avgvi †m‡ji evB‡i K_vevZ©v ej‡Q| Zviv Avgvi †m‡ji

Zvjv †f‡½ Avgv‡K D×vi Ki‡j Avwg †`L‡Z cvB K‡qKRb msm`

m`m¨ Avgv‡K D×vi Ki‡Z G‡m‡Qb| Zviv Avgv‡K D×vi K‡i Avgvi

evox †cŠwQ‡q †`b| ciw`b wcjLvbv Avwm Ges Avgvi i“‡g wM‡q

Avgvi wRwbm cÎ †LvuR Ki‡Z hvB| †mLv‡b wM‡q †`L‡Z cvB Avgvi

wKQz K¨vk UvKv, 1wU j¨vcUc Kw¤úDUvi, 1wU †gvevBj †mU, wKQz cÖ‡qvRbxq KvMRcÎ I 1wU Nwo Avgvi K¶ †_‡K jywÚZ n‡q‡Q| Avgvi e¨vw³MZ †gvevBj †mU b¤^i wQj 01727-591170, †bvwKqv

jywÚZ nq| Gici wewfbœ MYgva¨g Ges Ab¨vb¨ Awdmvi‡`i wbKU

†_‡K Rvwb‡Z cvwi wWGwW †ZŠwn‡`i †bZ…‡Z¡ wW,GwW iwng, wWG Rwjj, wW,GwW bvwmi, wWGwW nvwee, wmMb¨vj g¨vb gwbi,wmcvnx

gwbi“¾vgvb nvwej`vi iwdK, wmcvnx †mwjg †iRv mn 14 R‡bi 1wU

`j gvbbxq cÖavbgš¿xi wbKU Zv‡`i wKQz `vex `vIqv Dc¯ v’cb K‡i| †mLv‡b Zviv wcjLvbvi 67 Rb †mbv Awdmvi‡K mn me©‡gvU 74 Rb‡K nZ¨vi NUbv, Mvox I evox‡Z AwMœ ms‡hvM Nievox jy›U‡bi NUbv †Mvcb K‡i Ges Zviv Zv‡`i NUbv‡K Pvcv †`qvi †Póv K‡i| wewWAvi we‡`ªvnxiv cwiKwíZ fv‡eB nZ¨vKvÛ msNUb K‡i|

With regard to the killing of the aforesaid army officers,  PW 10 BA-3094 Major Md Alamgir Hossain Dewan has stated in his evidence as follows:-

...........MZ 22/2/09 Zvwi‡L cyi¯‹vi MÖn‡bi Rb¨ BDR        mßvn Dcj‡¶ wcjLvbvq †hvM`vb Kwi| BDR G †mŠif †KvqvUv‡i DwV| 25/2/09 mKvj 8-55 wgwb‡U `ievi n‡j †cŠ‡Q Awdmvi‡`i mvwi‡Z ewm| 9 Uvq DG `ievi ïi “ K‡ib| hLb WvjfvZ m¤ú‡K© A_© wnmv‡ei K_v e‡jb ZLb Stage G GKRb ˆmwbK DG g‡nv`q

eivei A¯¿ ZvK K‡i| Zvi bvg wmcvnx gCb| GKUz c‡i 2 ivDÛ dvqvi nq| ZLb me ˆmwbKiv †ei n‡Z D×Z nq Ges `iRv Rvbvjv

fvs‡Z _v‡K| Avwg Zv‡`i av°vq `iRvi w`‡K †h‡Z eva¨ nB| ZLb

`ievi n‡ji Pvi w`‡K ˆmwbKiv ¸jv¸wj Ki‡Q| 10/12 Rb mk¯¿

‰mwbK dvqvi Ki‡Z Ki‡Z GwM‡q Av‡m| Zv‡`i g‡a¨ wmcvnx gwZb, wmcvnx wg›Uz †kL, wmcvnx Kvgvj †gvj−v, wmcvnx mvB`yj Bmjvg mK‡j

44 e¨vUvwjqv‡bi, Avwg Zv‡`i wPb‡Z cvwi| Gi ci my‡ev `i †ejv‡qZ

Avgv‡K av°v w`‡q e‡j m¨vi Avcwb P‡j hvb| c‡i Avevi G‡m e‡j

Avcwb P‡j hvb| Avwg ZLb `ievi n‡ji DËi w`‡Ki gvV †cwi‡q

XvKv †m±‡ii w`‡K hvB| †mLv‡b †M‡U ˆmwbK‡`i K_v ej‡Z †`wL I Avgvi w`‡K m‡›`‡ni `„wó‡Z ZvKvq| Avwg cwiw¯’wZ AbyK~‡j bv †`‡L Avgvi evmvq P‡j hvB| Avwg ZLb DGFI  ‡W‡¯‹ I †gRi AvQv`

DGFI, K‡Y©j gnwmb, K‡Y©j Avwid†K welqUv AewnZ Kwi| ZLb 1021 Uv †e‡R †M‡Q| ZLb mg¯— ˆmwbK‡`i nv‡Z A¯¿ †`wL I Zviv

†Mvjv¸wj Ki‡Q †`wL| evmvq †M‡j K‡Y©j Av³v‡ii ¯¿x I Ab¨vb¨ Awdmvi‡`i  ¯¿xMY  Avgvi  evmvq  Avkªq  †bq|  evmvi  bx‡P  †gRi BDmy‡diP rivate Car  G Av¸b jvwM‡q †`q| Avwg Uniform

e`jv‡q Av¸b wbqš¿‡b Avbvi †Póv Kwi| wKQz ˆmwbK Avgvi w`‡K ¸wj

Ki‡j Avwg evmvq P‡j hvB| ¸wj Avgvi gv_vi Dci w`‡q hvq|

mK‡jB evmvi wfZ‡i `iRv AvUwK‡q _vwK I Abygvb 11-15 wgt 6Rb mkª¯¿ ˆmwbK `iRv †f‡½ N‡i cÖ‡ek K‡i I mK‡ji †gvevBj‡dvb wQwb‡q †bq| Avwg Zv‡`i †gngvb cwiPq w`‡q i¶v

cvB| GKRb ˆmwbK Avgvi ¯¿x‡K ivB‡dj w`‡q wc‡V AvNvZ K‡i| Abygvb 11 Uvi w`‡K Avgv‡`i mKj‡K †KvqvUvi Mv‡W© wb‡q hvq| wmcvnx gwRei e‡j cv‡R‡iv Mvox‡Z DVvi gRv eyS‡e| wmcvnx gwRei

mk¯¿ wQj| †KvqvU©vi Mv‡W© ïb‡Z cvB I †`L‡Z cvB GKRb nvwej`vi I wKQz ‰mwbK ejv ewj Ki‡Q `ievi n‡j me Awdmvi‡`i

nZ¨v Kiv n‡q‡Q, wewfbœ BDwb†U Mobile K‡i e‡j GLvbKvi me

Awdmvi‡`i nZ¨v K‡iwQ †ZvgivI ‡Zvgv‡`i Awdmvi‡`i nZ¨v Ki|

c‡ii w`b 26/2/09 †ejv 3Uvq Avgv‡`i cwiev‡ii m`m¨‡`i 4bs

†MU w`‡q †Q‡o‡Q| Abygvb 5Uvq MP ‡Mvjvg †iRvi mnvqZvq Avgiv

Qvov cvB| c‡i BDR m`m¨iv Avgvi evmvi me gvjvgvj jyU K‡i|

UvKv cqmv j¨vcUc| Mobile me wb‡q hvq| evmvi me wRwbl jyUcvU K‡i| 25 fwi ¯^Y© †bq|

With regard to the killing of the aforesaid army

officers, PW 11 BA-3861 Major Md Sujaul Haque

has stated in his evidence as follows:-

..........25/2/09 Zvwi‡L mKvj 6-30 wgt Awdmvi †g‡m ‡gRi Rv‡q`xi ms‡M mKv‡j bv¯ v— Kwi| Zvi c~‡e© †gRi kvn Avj‡gi †`Lv nq| wZwb Rvbvb `ievi 1N›Uv wcwQ‡q 9Uvq AbywôZ

n‡e| Avwg 9Uvi c~‡e©B `ievi n‡j Dcw¯ Z’ n‡q wcQ‡bi` w‡K ewm|

9Uvq `ievi ïi“ nq| 9.30 wgt `ievi PjvKv‡j wmcvnx gvCb A¯¿ nv‡Z `ievi n‡j cÖ‡ek K‡i I DG  Gi w`‡K A¯¿ ZvK K‡i| GB

mgq `ievi n‡j Dcw¯ Z’ ˆmwbK Mb `uvwo‡q hvq I wewfbœ ` w‡K ‡`Šov‡`Šwo ïi“ K‡i| GB mgq Avwg ¸wji AvIqvR ïb‡Z cvB| c‡i Ab¨vb¨ mK‡ji gZ Avwg `ievi nj †_‡K †ei n‡q DËi w`‡K hvB|

GB mgq Avwg ¸wji AvIqvR ïb‡Z cvB| Avwg ZvwK‡q ‡`wL 20/25

Rb BDR Gi mk¯¿ `j `ievi n‡ji w`‡K †`Šwo‡q Avm‡Q †KD †KD `ievi n‡ji w`‡K ZvK K‡i dvqvi Ki‡Q| Avwg Mv‡Qi Avov‡j hvB|

†mB mgq ‡h mKj mk¯¿ BDR ˆmwbKMb Avgvi mvg‡b w`qv A¯¿ mn †`Šwo‡q hvq, Zviv n‡jb nvwej`vi Lwjj, nvwej`vi †mwjg, j¨vt bv‡qK †gvdv¾j, j¨vt bvt nvi“b, wmcvnx mv‡bvqvi, wmcvnx †`‡jvqvi, wmcvnx gÄyi mevB 36 e¨vUvwj‡q‡bi m`m¨| c‡i Ae¯ v’ AebwZ †`‡L

`ievi n‡ji cwð‡g Aew¯ Z’ cvwievwiK evm¯’v‡b cÖ‡ek Kwi| evmvi bv¤^vi hgybv-4, c‡i Rvwb evmvUv bv‡qe my‡e`vi kvn Aj v‡gi e mv| evmvq ‡cŠ‡Q kvn Avj‡gi ¯¿x I 3 mš—vb I 2 Rb BDR m`m¨

hv‡`i bvg nvwej`vi gwgb whwb DDG  Awd‡mi KiwbK, bv‡qK kvnv`vZ B‡jw± w« kqvb I 36 e¨vUvwj‡q‡bi Bgvg mvB`yj‡K †`L‡Z cvB| BDR m`m¨iv Uniform  cwiwnZ wQ‡jb| kvn Avjg ZLb evmvq wQ‡jb bv| c‡i †Mvjv¸wj I we‡ùvi‡bi kã ïwb| ZLb bv‡qK kvnv`v‡Zi civgk©µ‡g Avwg Uniform Ly‡j †dwj| †m Avgv‡K evmv †_‡K jyw½ I Rvgv †`q| Avwg †mUv cwiavb Kwi| Abygvb 11.30 wgt kvn Avjg evmvq Av‡mb| Abygvb 4.30 wgt bv‡qK kvnv`vZ msev` Avbvi Rb¨ evmv †_‡K †ei nq| †m ivZ 8.30 wgt evmvq ‡diZ Av‡m| †m Avgv‡K mveav‡b _vK‡Z e‡j| evmv †_‡K P‡j hvq| Gi c‡i mk¯¿ GKRb ˆmwbK H evmvq cÖ‡ek K‡i †m iv‡Z †L‡q ivwÎ hvcb K‡i| c‡i kvn Avj‡gi †Q‡ji KvQ †_‡K Rvb‡Z cvwi ˆmwbKwU

Zv‡`i cwiwPZ| 26/2/09 Zvwi‡L mKvj 7.30 wgt kvn Avj‡gi cwievi evmv †Q‡o P‡j hvb| c‡i kvn Avjg, Avwg, bv‡qK kvnv`vZ

I nvwej`vi gwgb 4_© Zvjvq hvB Ges †mLv‡b Ae¯ v’ b Kwi| wKQz mgq c‡i kvn AvjgI kvnv`vZ P‡j hvq| Abygvb 16.30 wgt bv‡qK kvnv`vZ †gvevB‡j Avgv‡K e‡j m¨vi Avcwb m‡i c‡ob| c‡i Abygvb we‡Kj 5Uvq wcjLvbvq cwð‡gi cÖvPxi AwZµg K‡i evB‡i Avgvi evmvq P‡j hvB|

The aforesaid fact of killing has been supported

and corroborated by  Sepoy Md. Habibur Rahman

CS. Accused No. 26  who in his confessional

statement has narrated as under:-

weMZ 1/11/1992 Bs‡iRx Avwg wmcvnx c‡` we,wW,Avi G †hvM  w`B| PUªMªv‡g 6 gvm †Uªwbs Gici Rvgvjcyi †hvM w`B| Rvgvjcyi, mvZ¶xiv,  Kywóqvq wewfbœ †gqv‡` PvKix Kivi ci 16/10/2005 Bs‡iRx  44  ivB‡dj e¨vUvwjq‡bi  Aaxb XvKv wcjLvbvq †hvM w`B| Abygvb cÖvq †`o eQi Av‡M ‰mwbK jvB‡bi

mvg‡b weKvj †ejvq wmcvnx †mwj‡gi mv‡_ Avgvi †`Lv n‡j †m e‡j

†h, Avgv‡`i we,wW, Avi G †m Avwg© Awdmvi Av‡Q Zv‡`i‡K mwi‡q Avgv‡`i wbRm¦ Awdmv‡ii e¨e¯nv Ki‡Z n‡e| GRb¨ DwK‡ji mv‡_ K_v e‡j‡Q Ges †ek wKQy UvKv cqmv LiP n‡e| ZLb Avwg Zv‡K e‡jwQjvg †h, Gme ej‡j †Zvi PvKix _vK‡e

bv|

weMZ 24/02/09 Bs‡iRx ivZ Abygvb 10.00 Uvi mgq wmcvnx wgRv‡bi (Avgvi 44 ivB‡dj e¨vUvwjq‡bi) mv‡_ Avgvi

†`Lv nq| wgRvb e‡j †h, P‡jb cvb †L‡q Avwm| ZLb Avwg Avi

wgRvb 5 b¤¦i †MU w`‡q †ei nB| cvb †L‡q nvuU‡Z nuvU‡Z  `w¶b w`‡K Abygvb 400/500 MR `y‡i hvB| †divi c‡_ 5  b¤¦i †MB‡Ui Abygvb 100 MR `w¶b w`‡K GKwU  evwoi cv‡kiv¯—vi

Dci `yRb ‰mwbK‡K †`L‡Z cvB| Zv‡`i‡K †`‡L Avwg Avi wgRvi †KŠZynjx n‡q evmvi mvg‡b `uvovB| evmvi wfZi DwK w`‡q K‡qKRb we,wW,Avi ‰mwbK †`L‡Z cvB| ZLb Kv‡i›U wQj bv| Zviv †gvgevwZ R¡vwj‡q e‡mwQj| Avgiv †`wL‡q Zviv G kc_ wb‡”Q |

Zviv kc_ KiwQj †h, Awdmvi‡`i wRw¤§ Kiv n‡e,aiv co‡j

†KD KviI K_v ej‡ev bv| H ‰mwbK‡`i g‡a¨ Avwg wmcvnx gvBb, wmcvnx †mwjg, wmcvnx KvRj, wmcvnx nvwme, nvwej`vi iwdK‡K wPb‡Z cvwi| Avi KvD‡K wPb‡Z cvwiwb| †fZ‡i evwn‡i

me wgwj‡q AvbygvwbK 14/15 Rb †jvK wQj| H mgq evox Iqvjvi

GK †jvK e‡j †h, Avcbviv GZ¸‡jv †jvK GZiv‡Z wK K‡ib? Zvi

K_v ï‡b Avwg Avi wgRvb P‡j Avwm| Ab¨ivI Zv‡`i wb‡R‡`i gZ

K‡i P‡j hvq|

weMZ 25/02/2009 Bs‡iRx mKvj Abygvb mvZUvi mgq nvwej`vi  Bg`v`  Avgv‡`i e¨vUvwjq‡bi  Abygvb 95/96 Rb ‰mwbK‡K djBb Kwi‡q `ievi n‡ji w`‡K wb‡q hvq| Abygvb †cŠ‡b

8 Uvi w`‡K Avwg `ievi n‡j cÖ‡ek K‡i gvSvgvwS RvqMvq ewm| mKvj 9.00 Uvq `ievi ïi“ nq| Abygvb 9.30 Uvi mgq wW,wR, mv‡ne hLb WvjfvZ Kg©myPx wel‡q e³„Zv w`w”Q‡jb nVvr K‡i 13 ivB‡dj e¨vUvwj‡q‡bi wmcvnx gBb g‡Â D‡V wW,wR i w`‡K Gm,

Gg, wR ZvK K‡i| ZLb ‰n‰P ïi“ nq mevB †Pqvi †Q‡o `vwo‡q hvq

Ges †h hvi gZ `ievi nj †_‡K †ei n‡q hvq| Avwg cwðg †MU

w`‡q `ievi nj †_‡K †ei n‡q Avm‡j myjZvb MªvDÛ Giw` K †_‡K

3/4 Rb gy‡Lvkciv wmcvnx‡K A¯¿ DwV‡q `ievi n‡jiw` ‡K †h Z

†`wL| ZLb Avwg gv‡Vi w`‡K bv wM‡q †m›Uªvj Gm,Gg, Gi evmvi mvg‡bi iv¯—v w`‡q 44 ivB‡dj e¨vUvwjq‡bi jvB‡b Avwm| Zvici

44 ivB‡dj e¨vUvwjq‡bi jvB‡b Avwm| Zvici mKvj Abygvb 9.40

Uvi mgq †K›`ªxq †Kvqv©Uvi MvW© †Kv‡Z hvB| we †Kv¤cvbxi †KvZ †_‡K GKwU Gm, Gg, wR, bsР  44/we/13 wbB Ges  GKwU g¨vMvwRb †jvW Kwi| A¯¿ mn Avwg 44 ivB‡dj e¨vUvwjq‡bi mvg‡b

P‡j Avwm| HLv‡b Avwg A¯¿ nv‡Z wKQy wKQy ‰mwbK †`L‡Z cvB| †cŠ‡b 10Uvi w`‡K Avwg 4_© †kÖYxi  d¨vwgwj †KvqvU©vi Gi cye©

cv‡k Avi, wc †cv‡ó hvB|†cv‡ói mvg‡b †Lvjv Ae¯nvq ¸wji e·

†`‡L g¨vMvwRb †jvW Kwi Ges GKwU duvKv dvqvi Kwi| HLvb †_‡K e¨viv‡K G‡m mvg‡b¨ bv¯—v K‡i †nj‡gU wbB| Zvici HLvb †_‡K

†ei n‡q KmvB †gv‡o hvB| KmvB †gv‡oi cv‡k d¨vwgwj †KvqvU©v‡ii

5g Zjvi Qv‡`i Dci A¯¿ nv‡Z wmcvnx nvwme‡K †`L‡Z cvB| Zvi

mv‡_ AviI K‡qKRb wQj wPb‡Z cvwiwb| HLvb †_‡K †WBix dvg©

n‡q byi †gvnv¤§` K‡j‡Ri †MB‡Ui `w¶b cv‡k Avwm| Hnv‡b

wmcvnx gywnZ‡K A¯¿ nv‡Z †`wL| wmcvnx gywn‡Zi mv‡_ Avwg `ievi

n‡ji `w¶b cv‡ki †gBb `iRvi Kv‡Q hvB|  `ievi n‡ji wfZ‡i

wmcvnx †mwjg Gi nv‡Z n¨vÛ gvBK wQj| †m gvBK w`‡q mKj Awdmvi‡K c`©vi Avovj n‡Z †ei n‡q Avm‡Z ejwQj| †mwj‡gi mv‡_ AviI 5/6 Rb A¯¿ avix wQj| Avwg I gywnZ ZLb `ievi

n‡ji `w¶b cwðg cv‡k hvB| G mgq my‡e`vi eveyj‡K `w¶b †MU

w`‡q †ei n‡q †RwmI †g‡mi w`‡K †h‡Z ‡`wL| Zvici 5/6 Rb A¯¿

avix mn †mwjg‡K Awdmvi‡`i jvBb K‡i cwðg †M‡Ui w`‡K wb‡q †h‡Z †`wL| Zviv Awdmvi‡`i cwðg cv‡ki `iRv w`‡q †ei

K‡i †dvqvivi DËi cv‡k `ievi n‡j XyKvi iv¯—vq †kvIqvwnqv

iv‡L| GKUy c‡i GKwU Mvox Av‡m| Mvox‡Z WªvBfvi Ges Kv‡jv †Pnvivi GKRb ‰mwbK wQj| MvoxwU `ievi n‡ji `w¶‡bi iv¯—v

w`‡q G‡m ï‡q _vKv Awdmvi‡`i DËi cwðg cv‡k `vuovq | Zvici

Mvwoi †m‡KÛ mx‡U emv wmcvnx Awdmvi‡`i w`‡K GKwU eªvk dvqvi K‡i 5 bs †M‡Ui w`‡K P‡j hvq| mv‡_ mv‡_ wd‡i G‡m

Avevi eªvk dvqvi K‡i| Zvici MvwowU `ievi n‡ji cwðg cvk

w`‡q myBwgs cy‡ji w`‡K P‡j hvq| ZLb ‰mwbKiv Awdmvi‡`i‡K

†ei K‡i wb‡q Av‡m ZvivI Awdmvi‡`i w`‡K eªvk dvqvi K‡i|

The aforesaid fact of killing of the army officers

stands supported by the confessional statement of

Sepoy Selim Reza CS accused No.6, which runs as

follows:-

..........Avwg 25/02/09 Bs ZvwiL Abygvb 6.30 wgwb‡Ui mgq

44 ivB‡djm e¨vUvwjq‡bi gv‡V wM‡q `iev‡ii D‡Ï‡k¨ dwjb nB|

Avgvi mv‡_ ÔBÕ ‡Kv¤úvbxi 10/12 dwjb nq| Avwg wmcvnx iwdK‡K ewj †h †Zvgvi `iev‡i †h‡Z n‡e bv| gvP© K‡i `iev‡ii w`‡K hvevi

mgq Avwg cÖmve Kivi bvg K‡i jvBb n‡Z †ei n‡q hvB| Avwg ZLb a~wcKvbvi iv¯—v w`‡q Avevi gv‡V Avwm| G mgq 44 e¨vUvwjq‡bi wmcvnx †g‡n`x‡K †dwUM †W«‡m †`‡L †Kv_vq hv‡”Q ‡m- wRÁvmv Ki‡j †m Rvbvq †h, AvB.Gb.wUi IqvwK©s-G hv‡”Q| Avwg Zv‡K `ievi n‡j Avm‡Z ewj| GKUy ci wmcvnx gCb, i“‡ej, kvnv`Z, mv¾v` mn 18/20 Rb BDR RIqvb gv‡V Av‡m| cÖ‡Z¨‡Ki Mv‡q `iev‡i hvevi BDwbdg© civ wQj| Avgiv AviI wKQy¶b A‡c¶v Kwi| Avi †Kn Avm‡Q bv ‡`‡L Avwg ewj †h GZ Kg †jvK wb‡q `ievi nj G¨vUvK

Kiv hv‡e bv| Avwg `iev‡i hvevi Rb¨ ewj| ZLb Avgiv mevB `ievi

n‡ji w`‡K iIbv ‡`B| 7.30 Uvi w`‡K myjZvb MÖvD‡Û †cŠuwQ| †`wL

44 e¨vUvwjq‡bi wmcvnx nvwee Ges wmcvnx AvjZvd gv‡V Mí KiZv‡Q| wmcvnx nvwee P‡j Avmvi Kvib Rvb‡Z Pvb| Avwg ewj †jvKRb bvB| KvR n‡e bv ZvB P‡j Gjvg| wmcvnx nvwee Avgv‡`i‡K m`i †g‡m †h‡Z e‡j| Av‡iv e‡j †h, `ievi n‡e 9.00

Uvi w`‡K Ges wZwb †jvK cvVv‡eb e‡j Avgv‡`i‡K Rvbvb| Avwg wmcvnx gCb Ges Avi.wc †iRvDj‡K wb‡q m`i †g‡m Avwm| †gm n‡Z wmcvnx gCb †gvevB‡j †dvb K‡i| 13 e¨vUvwjq‡bi wmcvnx i“‡ej, wmcvnx mv¾v` mn 10/12 Rb we wW Avi Av‡m| Gici wmcvnx AvjZvd Av‡m (44 e¨vUvwjqb)| wmcvnx AvjZvd †dvm©‡K `yBfvM K‡i| GK MÖ“c †KvZ †f‡½ A¯¿ wb‡e Ges Ab¨ MÖ“c g¨vMwRb †f‡½ †Mvjv evi“` wb‡e| ‡KvZ fv½v MÖ“‡c Avwg, wmcvnx i“‡ej, wmcvnx mv¾v`, wmcvnx gCb, wmcvnx KvRj, j¨v›mbv‡qK AvKivg mv‡_ AviI 13 e¨vUvwjq‡bi ‰mwbK wQj| Avgiv †gvU 15 R‡bi g‡Zv ne| g¨vMwRb fv½v MÖ“‡c wmcvnx AvjZvd, Avi. wc †iRvDj, G we wmwÏK (wmcvnx 44 e¨vUvwjqb) mn 13 e¨vUvwjq‡bi ˆmwbK wQj| Av‡iv A‡bK BDR  m`m¨ G‡m †hvM †`q| Avgvi `j

†KvZ n‡Z A¯¿ Avb‡e Avi AvjZv‡di `j g¨vMwRb n‡Z ¸wj Avb‡e|

Zvici A¯¿ I ¸wj wb‡q `yB `j GK n‡q A¯¿ I ¸wj wewbgq K‡i

`ievi nj A¨vUvK Kivi cwiKíbv †bIqv nq| Avgvi `j ‡m›U«vj

‡KvqvU©vi Mv‡W© hvB| †cQb w`K †_‡K Avgiv †KvqvU©vi Mv‡W© cÖ‡ek Kwi| †`wL †KvqvU©vi Mv‡W©i mvg‡b Ges †cQ‡b `yÕRb wmcvnx A¯¿ mn wWDwU Ki‡Q Ges ‡gRi wiqvR m¨vi Awdmvm© i“‡gi `iRv‡Z `uvwo‡q

Av‡Q| Avwg, mv¾v` I i“‡ej †gRi m¨vi‡K a‡i †dwj Ges ‡kvwq‡q

†d‡j †PvL, nvZ, cv †eu‡a †dwj| mv¾v` m¨v‡ii †gvevBj c‡KU

‡_‡K wb‡q †bq| m¨vi e‡jb, Avgv‡K gvwim bv; Avgv‡K †Q‡o †`|

i“‡ej m¨vi‡K †Kv‡Zi Pvwei K_v wRÁvmv Ki‡j m¨vi Szjv‡bv _ Kv

Pvwe †`wL‡q †`q| mv¾v` Avi i“‡ej i“g n‡Z ‡ei n‡q hvq|

m¨vi‡K Zvici Avwg i“‡g AvUwK‡q `iRvq Zvjv jvwM‡q †`B| Avgv‡`i mv‡_ GKRb †KvqvU©vi Mv‡W©i wWDwU‡Z _v‡K| Zvi nv‡Z ivB‡dj wQj wKš‘ ¸wj bv _vKvq wWDwUiZ wmcvnx‡K g¨vMwRb n‡Z ¸wj Avb‡Z cvVvB| †m ¸wj wb‡q Av‡m| wmcvnxwU 13 e¨vUvwjq‡bi|

†mI Avgv‡`i mv‡_ †hvM †`q| Gi g‡a¨ gCb, GKivg, mv‡_ Av‡iv

BDR  A¯¿ †KvZ n‡Z wb‡q `iev‡ii w`‡K hvq| Avwg †KvqvU©vi

Mv‡W©i wcQb w`K w`‡q 24 ivB‡dj e¨vUvwjq‡bi mvg‡b w`‡q †ei n‡q

hvB| Avwg `iev‡ii w`‡K †h‡Z _vwK| Abygvb 9.30 Uv mgq n‡e|

Ggb mgq †`wL BDR m`m¨iv mevB †`ŠovBqv †KvqvU©vi Mv‡W©i w`‡K Avm‡Q| `ievi n‡ji cwð‡g ¯‹y‡ji mvg‡b GKwU wkï Mv‡Qi wbK‡U

GKRb BDR  †K nv‡Z ey‡jU cÖ“d R¨v‡KU Ges †nj‡gU cwiwnZ

Ae¯ v’ q †`L‡Z cvB| cÖPÛ ¸wj n‡”Q| Avwg R¨v‡KU Ges †nj‡gU Avgv‡K w`‡Z ewj| †m R¨v‡KU Ges †nj‡gU Ly‡j w`‡j Ag vw cwiavb

Kwi Ges Zvi wbKU n‡Z ivB‡dj †bB| wVK Ggb mgq DËi w`K

n‡Z BDR- Gi GKwU wcK-Avc Avm‡Z †`wL| wcK Avc †_‡K gvB‡K mevB‡K A¯¿ wb‡Z e‡j| Avwg Mvox _vgvB| wcK AvcwU nvZ

Zy‡j _vgvB| wcK Avc †_‡K Avwg g¨vMv‡dvb †bB| †`wL Wvb cv‡ki

myBwgs cy‡ji (DËi-c~e© w`K) w`K n‡Z gy‡Lvk cov A¯¿av† ij x vKRb Avm‡Q| Pvwiw`K n‡Z A¯¿avix BDR  `ievi n‡ji w`‡K Avm‡Z

_v‡K| Ges mvg‡b dvqvi n‡Z _v‡K| Avwg g¨vMv‡dvb wb‡q `ie i

n‡ji wfZ‡i cÖ‡ek Kwi| `ievi n‡ji wfZ‡i me †Pqvi †Uwej DjU

cvjU Kiv| †÷‡Ri mvg‡bi c`©vi bovPov †`L‡Z eyS‡Z cvwi †mLv‡b

Awdmviiv jywK‡q Av‡Q| Avwg g¨vMv‡dv‡b ewj, ÔÔm¨vi, Avcbviv †ei n‡q Av‡mb, Avcbv‡`i‡K wbivc` RvqMvq wbqv hv‡evÕÕ| ZLb †m›U«vj Gm. Gg Ges Avi.wc †RwmI †ei n‡q Av‡m| Zvici wZbRb gwnjv Wv³vi †gRi i“Lmvbv, †jt K‡b©j Bqvmgxb Ges †gRi Rvnvbvi Avevi e‡jb †jt K‡b©j Rvnvbviv mn 5/6 Avwg© Awdmvi Ges 40 e¨vUvwjq‡bi †gRi ‡ei n‡q Av‡mb| Avwg †`wL GKRb A¯¿avix gy‡Lvk civB DR  RIqvb ¸wj Ki‡Z Pvq| Avwg wb‡la Kwi| Avwg Zvici wZbRb gwnjv Wv³vi‡K cwðg cv‡k¦©i †MBU w`qv †ei K‡i †`B| wVK ZLbB `ievi n‡ji evwni evwni n‡Z GKwU ¸wj G‡m GKRb Avwg© Awdmv‡ii gv_vq jvM‡j wZwb gvwU‡Z c‡o hvb|

The aforesaid fact of killing of the army officers

stands supported by the confessional statement of

No.75014 Sepoy Md. Kamal Mollah CS accused

No.69, which runs as follows:-

............†W«m †PÄ K‡i †cŠ‡b `kUvi w`‡K Avwg †Kv‡Z wM‡q GKwU ivB‡dj wbB Ges †Kv‡Zi evB‡i GKwU Ggywbkb e· †_‡K `k ivDÛ ¸wj wbB| ivB‡dj wb‡q Avgvi e¨viv‡Ki w`‡K Avmvi mgq †`wL

44 e¨vUvwjq‡bi ingZ Mvwo Pvwj‡q wb‡q Avm‡Q| †m Avgv‡K agK

w`‡q Mvwo‡Z DV‡Z e‡j| wKQy`~i hvIqvi ci Avgvi 44 e¨vUvwjq‡bi wmcvnx Avwgbyj‡K †`L‡Z †c‡q ingZ Avwgbyj‡KI Mvwo‡Z Zy‡j †bq| ingZ MvwowU `ievi n‡ji w`‡K wb‡q hvq| Mvwo `ievi n‡ji

mvg‡b Avm‡j Avwgbyj jvd w`‡q †b‡g hvq| Zvi nv‡Z ivB‡dj wQj|

ingZ Avgv‡K †R.wm.I †KvqvU©v‡ii †Kvbvq bvwg‡q †`q| ZLb `ievi

n‡ji DËi w`K †_‡K wmcvnx mvBdzj‡K `ievi n‡ji w`‡K ¸wj Ki‡Z

†`wL Ges Awdmvi‡`i MvjvMvwj Ki‡Z †`wL| mvBdz‡ji mv_ ‡ AvwgI

GK ivDÛ ¸wj Kwi| c‡i mvBdzj‡K `ievi n‡ji †gBb †M‡Ui w`‡K

†`Š‡o †h‡Z †`wL| ZLb Avwg `ievi n‡ji cwðg w`‡K hvB| HLv‡b

15/20 Rb we.wW.Avi †Rvqvb‡K 7/8 Rb Awdmvi‡K ‡dvqvivi cv‡k

¸wj K‡i nZ¨v Ki‡Z †`wL| H we.wW.Avi RIqvb‡`i g‡a¨ Avgvi e¨vUvwjq‡bi wmcvnx gwZb wmcvnx gywnZ fvB‡K †`wL| HLv‡b wW.G.wW bvwmi Ges wmcvnx iwdKI (44 e¨vUvwjq‡bi) wQj| GKUy c‡i wmcvnx igRvb‡K (15 ivB‡dj ) GKwU mv`v gvB‡µvev‡m K‡i Avb‡Z †`wL

Ges Zuv‡K Mvwo‡Z e‡m ¸wj Ki‡Z †`wL| G mgq nvmcvZv‡ji wZbRb gwnjv Wv³vi‡K †dvqvivi cv‡k †`wL|

The aforesaid fact of killing of the army officers

stands supported by the confessional statement of No.

61489 Sepoy Md. Abdul Muhit CS accused No.70,

which runs as follows:-

..........Na 25.02.09 ¢MËx pL¡m 8.00 O¢VL¡u clh¡l öl¦ qh¡l Lb¡ b¡L¡u pL¡m 7.00 O¢VL¡u B¢j clh¡−l B¢pz clh¡l 9.00 O¢VL¡u q−h ö−e B¢j h¡p¡u Q−m k¡Cz Aafl h¡p¡u ®b−L ¢Q¿ ¡¹ L¢l clh¡−l k¡h ¢Le¡z h¡p¡u b¡L¡hÙÛ¡u B¢j …¢ml në f¡Cz Aafl

¢ia−l Y¤¢L 5 eðl ®NV ¢c−uz ®pM¡−e ®b−L HLSe °p¢e−Ll ¢eLV q−a 1V¡ l¡C−gm ®eCz HLV¤ p¡j−e ®k−u B¢j ¢pf¡q£ q¡¢hh, ¢pf¡q£ −p¢mj−L f¡Cz ®pM¡−e B¢j J A−e−L ¢Rm a¡−cl ¢Q¢e e¡z HC S¡uN¡V¡ qm clh¡l q−ml c¢re f¡−nÄÑl ®jCe ®NCVz ®pM¡−e b¡L¡hÙ ¡Û u p¤−hc¡l h¡h¤m−L clh¡l qm q−a ®hl q−u Bp−a −c¢Mz ¢pf¡q£ ®p¢mj

−jN¡ ®g¡e q−a ®O¡oe¡ ¢c−u A¢gp¡l−cl−L h¡¢q−l Bp−a h−mz aMe

pju Ae¤j¡e 10.30 O¢VL¡z Bj¡l p¡j−e A−eL A¢gp¡l−cl …¢m L−l qaÉ¡ L−lz

It may be mentioned that the 1st group of officers being compelled came out from different hideouts of the Darbar Hall at the order of Sepoy Selim Reza and then the officers including the lady officers were taken outside through the west gate of the Darbar Hall at gunpoint by Sepoy Selim Reza and the other BDR rebels. Subsequently, having gone out of the Darbar Hall, the officers were persecuted physically and mentally. The lady officers were also persecuted and tortured physically and mentally for some times and then taken to the hospital by the BDR rebels picking them on the backside of the pickup on the plea that the lady doctor army officers would come to their use for medical treatments. Lastly the remaining officers were mercilessly killed by the BDR rebels at the north-west entry way of the Darbar Hall situated in the north side

of the fountain opening several burst-fires and fires on them.

After killing the 1st group of officers, Sepoy Selim Reza again came back at the stage with arms and megaphone. By using the megaphone, Sepoy Selim Reza ordered the army officers to come out from the different hideouts of the Darbar Hall. In spite of ordering the army officers to come out, the officers did not come out as a result of which Sepoy Selim Reza scolded the army officers with the filthy languages and issued threat to kill them. When the DG, DDG and other officers came out from the stage, Sepoy Selim Reza scolded and ordered the army officers to go ‘one by one’ maintaining a line raising their hands. Then the officers started going towards the west side of the Darbar Hall maintaining a line as per order of the Sepoy Selim Reza. At the same time,

Sepoy Selim Reza, Sepoy Sajjad Hossain of 13 Rifle Battalion, Sepoy Ibrahim, Sepoy Obaidul, Sepoy Rafiqul of 44 Rifle Battalion and Lance Naik Ekram of 24 Rifle Battalion and other BDR rebels followed the army officers aiming arms at them. As soon as the DG and other officers went out of the Darbar Hall through west-north gate, the BDR rebels namely Sepoy Selim Reza, Sepoy Ibrahim, Sepoy Rafiqul, Sepoy Obaidul, Sepoy Abdul Matin, Sepoy Muhit, Sepoy Kamal Mollah of 44 Rifle Battalion, Sepoy Sajjad of 13 Rifle Battalion, Lance Naik Ekram of 24 Rifle Battalion opened burst-fires and fires on the army officers as a result of which the army officers succumbed instantly to the bullet injuries. The aforesaid BDR rebels also charged bayonets and kicked on the dead bodies to ensure the death of the officers. When the BDR rebels became confirmed

about the death of the officers, they went away from

the place of occurrence. DAD Nasir was present with

the BDR rebels at the time of taking out the officers

from the Darbar Hall at gunpoint and at the time of

killing the army officers.    

     The aforesaid fact of killing is evident from the

evidence of  PW 9 Lieutenant Colonel Md. Maksudul Haque who came to Pilkhana from

Kumilla to receive President’s Rifles Madel. He categorically stated in his evidence that............GK

ch©v‡q wmwbqi AwdmviMb DG mv‡ne‡K †÷‡Ri wcQ‡b wb‡q Avkªq MÖnb K‡i| `ievi n‡j ¸wj Avm‡Z _vK‡j mK‡j ï‡q c‡i| c‡i `ievi nj cÖvq dvKv n‡q hvq| Avwg †÷‡R c`©vi Avov‡j jywK‡q †_‡K cwiw¯ w’ Z ch©‡e¶b Kwi| nVvr 10/15 Rb BDR Gi mk¯¿ we‡`ªvnx `ievi n‡j Xy‡K G‡jvcv_vix ¸wj Ki‡Z _v‡K| e wwfbœ RvqMvq jywK‡q _vKv Awdmvi‡`i gv_vi Dci nvZ Zy‡j †ein ‡q Avm‡Z e‡j| Zv‡`i Av‡`‡k A‡b‡KB †ei n‡q Avm‡Z _v‡K|

Awdmvi‡`i 10/15 R‡bi GKwU `j‡K gv_vi Dci nvZ Zy‡j i `evi

nj †_‡K A‡¯¿i gy‡L †ei K‡i wb‡q hvq| wKQy¶b ci `iev  in‡ji

evB‡i cÖPÛ ¸jv¸wji kã ïwb| wKQy¶b ci wmcvnx †mwjg †iRv 44 e¨vUvwjqb  nv‡Z  A¯¿  Zy‡j  g¨vMv‡dvb  wb‡q  †÷‡Ri  Kv‡Q  Gm ‡ Awdmvi‡`i †ei n‡q Avm‡Z e‡j| †ei bv n‡j ¸wj Kivi ûgwK

†`q| ZLb DG DDG mn cÖvq 10/12 Rb Awdmvi †ei n‡q

†÷‡R †_‡K †b‡g Av‡mb| wmcvnx †mwjg MvjvMvwj w`‡q Av‡`k †`b

go one by one DG mn Awdmviiv mvwie×fv‡e n‡ji cwðg

w`‡K †h‡Z _v‡K| wmcvnx †mwjg †iRv QvovI wmcvnx mv¾v` û‡mb

13 e¨vUvwjqb ¢pf¡q£ ChË¡¢qj 44 hÉ¡V¡¢mu¡e ¢pf¡q£ Ievq`yj 44

e¨vUvwjqb wmcvnx wmcvnx iwdKzj  44  e¨vUvwjqb  I j¨v›m bv‡qK GKivg 24 e¨vUvwjqb mn AviI wKQy BDR m`m¨ Awdmv‡`i w`‡K

A¯¿ ZvK K‡i `ievi n‡ji cwðg w`‡K †h‡Z _v‡K| DG `ievi n‡j

cwðg DËi †MU w`‡q †ei nIqvi gvÎB cÖPÛ †Mvjv¸wj ïi“ nq| Awdmviiv Avkª‡qi Rb¨ cvjv‡Z _v‡K| wmcvnx †mwjg †iRv wmcvnx Av‡Zvqvi 44 e¨vUvwjqb| wmcvnx Beªvnxg, wmcvnx Ievq`yj, wmcvnx

iwdKzj, wmcvnx mv¾v`, j¨vt bv‡qK GKivg 24 e¨vUvwjqb mn A‡b‡KB Awdmvi‡`i w`‡K ¸wjel©©Y Ki‡Z †`wL| cwiw¯ w’ Zi fqvenZv Dcjw× K‡i GK my‡hv‡M `ievi nj †_‡K ‡ei n| B

The aforesaid fact of killing of the army officers

stands supported by the confessional statement of

Sepoy Selim Reza CS accused No.6.  The relevant

portion of confessional statements runs as follows:-

..........Avwg Avevi `ievi n‡ji †÷‡Ri mvg‡b G‡m g¨vMv‡dv‡b Awdmvi‡`i †ei n‡q Avmvi Rb¨ WvwK| ZLb †m±i Gm.Gg my‡e`vi †gRi †ei n‡q Av‡m| Zvi †cQ‡b wW wR, W wwWwR m¨Ai, K‡b©j Avwbm mn 7/8 Rb Awdmvi †ei n‡q Av‡m| Avwg g¨vMv‡dv‡b ewj, ÔÔ‡Mv Iqvb evB IqvbÕÕ| †mbviv ZLb `ievi n‡ji wfZ‡ii DËi cvk w`qv cwðg †MU w`qv †ei nevi Rb¨ hvq|wW wR

m¨vi jvB‡bi Av‡M P‡j Av‡mb| wW wR m¨vi mn 6/7 Rb Awdmvi cwðg †MBU w`qv †ei n‡ZB †dvqvivi w`K †_‡K GKwU eªvk Kiv nq| wWwR m¨vi mn 4/5 Rb `iev‡ii evwn‡i Ges AviI 3/4  Rb

`iev‡ii †fZ‡i c‡o hvq| ZLb GKUv ¸wj Avgvi evg nv‡Z Av‡iKUv ¸wj Avgvi cvQvq jv‡M| Avwg ZLb DËi- cwðg `iRv w`‡q †ei nB MovBqv MovBqv| BwZg‡a¨ 12/13 Awdmvi gviv †M‡Q|

The aforesaid fact of killing of the army officers

stands supported by the confessional statement of No.

74852 Sepoy Md. Rafiqul Islam CS accused No.19.

The relevant portion of confessional statements runs

as follows:-

..........Avwg A¯¿ wb‡q `ievi n‡ji w`‡K hvB| `ievi n‡ji

cwðg cv‡k¦© wkgy Mv‡Qi wb‡P `uvovB| ILv‡b Av‡M †_‡K †mwjg `uvov‡bv wQj| †Mvj cvwbi PZ¡‡ii cvk †_‡K wmcvnx KvRj I wmcvnx †iRvDj `ievi n‡ji w`‡K ¸wj KiZv‡Q| †mwjg Avgv‡K e‡j wW. G. wW bvwmi m¨vi KB? Avwg ewj Rvwb bv| ZLb †mwjg e‡j, Pj wfZ‡i wMqv †`wL| Avwg ewj, hvebv| ZLb †mwjg Avgv‡K e‡ , bv Pj| Zvici Avwg Avi †mwjg `ievi n‡ji wfZ‡i XywK| †`wL me

†Pqvi G‡jvcv_vwi †djv‡bv| †Kvb gvbyl †`Lv hvq bv| Avgv‡K wW.

G. wW m¨vi †Kv_vq †`L‡Z e‡j †mwjg| Avwg `ievi n‡ji †÷‡Ri mvg‡b hvB| †`wL †÷‡Ri cv‡ki †`qv‡j wW. G. wW bvwmi m¨vi †njvb w`qv e‡m Av‡Q| Avwg Ibv‡i nvZ a‡i UvBbv wbqv Avwm| Ibvi †`Lv‡`wL ‡m›U«vj Gm. Gg. †KI Iqv‡ji Avovj n‡Z ‡ei n‡q Av‡m| `iev‡ii gvSvgvwS `uvwo‡q wmcvnx †mwjg n¨vÛgvBK w`‡q †h mg¯— Awdmvi †÷‡Ri †cQ‡b c`©vi Avov‡j, ivbœvN‡i, Uq‡j‡U jywK‡q Av‡Q- Zv‡`i‡K †ei n‡q Avm‡Z e‡j| ZLb `ievi n‡j wmcvnx †iRvDj, wmcvnx KvRj, wmcvnx AvjZvd, wmcvnx gCb Xy‡K| Zv‡`i mevi nv‡Z A¯¿ wQj| †mwjg K‡qK evi gvB‡K ejvi ci ‡Kn †ei nq bvB| ZLb †mwjg MvwjMvjvR K‡i Awdmvi‡`i‡K †ei n q Avm‡Z e‡j| e‡j, ÔÔevb‡Pv‡Ziv, gv`vi †Pv‡`iv †eiv n‡q Avq, bv

nq ¸wj KieÕÕ| Gici `yB GKRb `yB GKRb K‡i †ei n‡q Am v‡| Avwg ZLb `ievi n‡ji gvSvgvwS‡Z Avwm| Gici G‡K G‡K c`©vi Avovj, ivbœvNi Ges Uq‡jU n‡Z 8/10 Rb Awdmvi †ei n‡q Av‡m|

wW wR m¨vi c`©vi Avovj †_‡K †ei n‡Z †`wL| Awdmviiv †ei nevi

ci wmcvnx †mwjg gvB‡K e‡j, GZw`b †Zviv Avgv‡`i wm‡½j jvB‡b

dj Bb KivBQm GLb †Zviv mevB wm‡½j jvB‡b dj Bb n|

Awdmviiv jvBb a‡i `uvovq, ZLb mevi mvg‡b wQj wW wR| GKRb Awdmvi e‡j D‡V, ÔÔ‡Zvgv‡`i wK mgm¨v, `vex `vIqv Avgv‡`i e‡jv, †Zvgv‡`i `vex `vIqv c~ib Kie, Avgv‡`i‡K †g‡ivbvÕÕ| ZLb wmcvnx

KvRj e‡j, GZw`b gvbv nq bvB, GLb Avi wK gvbv n‡e| Gici me Awdmvi‡`i‡K jvBb K‡i cwðg †MB‡Ui w`‡K †bIqv nq| Avwg Awdmvi‡`i †cQ‡b _vwK| mv‡_ wW. G. wW bv‡mi wQj| Awdmvi v †MB‡Ui gy‡L †cuvQ‡j †MB‡Ui KvQ †_‡K wmcvnx gywnZ me© cÖ_g ¸wj K‡i| mv‡_ mv‡_ wW wR m¨vi c‡o hvq| Gici Avwg, wmcvnx †iRvDj, wmcvnx gCb, wmcvnx AvjZvd, G‡jvcv_vwi ¸wj Ki‡Z _vwK| †cQb n‡Z Avwg ¸wj Kwi| Avgvi ¸wj‡K jvB‡bi †cQ‡bi

†gRi i¨vs‡Ki `yBRb Awdmvi gviv hvq| Gici Avgiv mevB

†cÖq‡bU w`‡q ¸wZ‡q, jvw_ †g‡i †`wL †h †Kn RxweZ Av‡Q wK bv| Avgiv wbwðZ nB †Kn RxweZ bvB| wmcvnx †mwjg Avgv‡K wW. G. wW bvwmi m¨vi‡K wbqv P‡j †h‡Z e‡j| Abygvb 1.00/ Uvi ci Avwg wW. G. wW bvwmi m¨vi‡K wb‡q 4_© d¨vwgwj †KvqvU©vi-G eveywP© m B`y‡ i evmvq hvB|

The aforesaid fact of killing of the army officers

stands supported by the confessional statement of No.

56942 Sepoy Md. Habibur Rahman CS accused

No.26. The relevant portion of confessional statements

runs as follows:-

...........c‡i †mwjg  Avevi  gvB‡K `ievi n‡j  _vKv Awdmvi‡`i jvBb a‡i †ei n‡Z e‡j| wW,wR K‡Y©j Avwbm m¨vi mn 5/6 Rb Awdmvi cwðg cv‡ki KuvP fvsMv `iRv w`‡q jvBb a‡i †ei nIqvi mgq wWwRmn 2/3 Rb†ei n‡q Avm‡j wmcvnx gywnZ eªvk dvqvi K‡i| ZLb wW,wR mn wZbRb Awdmvi gvwU‡Z jywU‡q c‡o| Zvi g‡a¨ K‡Y©j Avwbm m¨viI wQj | ZLb †mwj‡gi

mv‡_ _vKv Ab¨vb¨ ‰mwbKivI eªvk dvqvi ïi“ K‡i| ZLb `ievi n‡ji wfZ‡i I ¸wji kã ïwb| G mgq AvwgI 2/3 ivDÛ

duvKv dvqvi Kwi| HLvb †_‡K Avwg 44 ivB‡dj e¨vUvwjq‡bi †Uªwbs †k‡W G‡m ewm|

The aforesaid fact of killing of the army officers stands supported by the confessional statement of No. 70906 Sepoy Md. Ibrahim CS accused No.68. The relevant portion of confessional statements runs as follows:-

............¸wji k‡ã A‡bK Awdmvi `iev‡ii †÷‡Ri

†cQ‡bi c`©vi Avov‡j jyKvb Avevi A‡bK Awdmvi `ievi nj ‡_‡K

cvjvBqv hvb| Zvici 44 ivB‡dj e¨vUvwjq‡bi wmcvnx †mwjg

†÷‡Ri evg cvk w`qv †÷‡R D‡V Av‡m| †m n¨vÛgvBK w`qv c` v© i

Avov‡j _vKv- jywK‡q _vKv Awdmvi‡`i‡K †ei n‡Z e‡j| †m Bs‡iwR‡Z e‡j- ÔAj Awdmvm© Iqvb jvB‡b dwjbÕ| AviI Bs‡iRx‡Z

e‡j| Avwg me eywS bvB| Rvbvjv w`qv `ievi n‡ji evwn‡i ‡K‡gv

†MwÄ Ges A¯¿ nv‡Z A‡bK BDR RIqvb‡K †`wL| wmcvnx †mwj‡gi GjvD‡›m cÖ_‡g 03 Rb gwnjv Awdmvi 4/5 Rb cyi“l Awdmvi †ei

nq| Zvici Av‡¯— Av‡¯— wWwR, wWwWwR, †m±i KgvÛviMb mn AvbygvwbK 15/16 Rb Awdmvi †ei nq| wmcvnx †mwjg me Awdmvi‡`i‡K e‡i ÔÔ‡Mv Iqvb evB IqvbÕÕ| `iev‡ii wfZ‡i ZLb

20/22 Rb A¯¿avix BDR Ges A¯¿ Qvov AviI K‡qKRb BDR me Awdmvi‡`i‡K jvBb a‡i cwðg w`‡Ki †MB‡Ui w`‡K wbqv hvq| evwn‡i ZLb cÖPyi ‡Mvjv¸wj nw”Qj| Avwg ZLb †÷‡Ri mvg‡b wQjvg| A‡¯¿i gy‡L Awdmvi‡`i jvB‡bi cÖ_‡g wWwR Zvici‡ m›U«vj Gm.Gg mn Ab¨vb¨ Awdmviiv wQj| Awdmvi‡`i jvBb hLb †ei nw”Qj, `iRvi Kv‡Q Avm‡ZB evwni nevi mv‡_ mv‡_ evwni n‡Z eªvk

nq| mv‡_ mv‡_ wWwR m¨vi, †m›U«vj Gm.Gg c‡o hvq| Gici Avevi A‡bK ¸wj nq- eªvk nq| ZLb 5/6 Rb Awdmvi c‡o hvq| Zvici

wmcvnx †mwjg Avgv‡K GKUv ivB‡dj w`‡q ¸wj Ki‡Z e‡j Avwg ZLb `w¶b †MB‡Ui Kv‡Q| `iev‡ii wfZ‡ii `w¶b w`‡Ki †MBU| Zvici Avwg ivB‡dj w`‡q GKRb Awdmvi‡K ¸wj Kwi| †m c‡o hv|

Avwg GB Awdmv‡ii bvg Rvwb bv| Zvici A¯¿ †hLv‡b †d‡j 44

ivB‡dj e¨vUvwjq‡bi Awd‡m P‡j hvB|

The aforesaid fact of killing of the army officers stands supported by the confessional statement of No.

75014 Sepoy Md. Kamal Molla CS Accused No.

69.The relevant portion of confessional statements

runs as follows:-

       ............H mgq wmcvnx  †mwjg‡K  †`Š‡o  †h‡Z †`wL|  c‡i wW.wR m¨v‡ii mv‡_ Ab¨vb¨ Awdmviiv †ei nIqvi mgq wmcvnx gywnZ

mn AviI gy‡Lvkavix A‡bK we.wW.Avi RIqvb‡K wW.wR mi ¨v mn Ab¨vb¨ Awdmvi‡`i ¸wj K‡i nZ¨v Ki‡Z †`wL| H mgq NUbv¯’‡j wmcvnx gwZb, wmcvnx iwdK, wW.G.wW. bvwmi m¨vi wQj| c‡i Avwg e¨viv‡K P‡j hvB|  

The aforesaid fact of killing of the army officers

stands supported by the confessional statement of No.

61489 Sepoy Md. Abdul Muhit CS accused No.70.

The relevant portion of confessional statements runs

as follows:-

..........Be¤j¡¢eL ®hm¡ ®f±−e 11 V¡l ¢c−L ¢X¢S p¡−qh H,H,¢S p¡−qh pq L−uL Se A¢gp¡l clh¡l q−ml f¢ÕQj ®NV ¢c−u

−hl q−u Bp¢Rmz aMe B¢j J ¢pf¡q£ q¡¢hh Bj¡−cl q¡−a b¡L AÙ»

¢c−u a¡−cl …¢m L¢lz aMe a¡l¡ ®pM¡−eC …¢m ¢hÜ q−u f−sk¡u Hhw jªa¥ÉhlZ L−lz ®kM¡−e ¢X,H,¢X e¡¢pl pq L−uLSe pnÙ» ¢pf¡q£ Ef¢ÙÛa ¢Rmz clh¡l q−ml f¢ÕQj f¡−nÄÑ ¢X¢X ®m. L−ZÑm Hm¡q£ j” l¤ pq 7/8 Se A¢gp¡−ll m¡n f−l ¢Rmz

The aforesaid fact of killing of the army officers

stands supported by the confessional statement of No.

73929 Sepoy Md. Abdul Matin CS accused No.12.

The relevant portion of confessional statements runs

as follows:-

...........HL¢V Q¡C¢eS l¡C−gm J 10 l¡Eä …¢m ®eCz pL¡m Ae¤j¡e 9.45 O¢VL¡l pju 5ew ®N−Vl p¡j−e k¡Cz k¡Ju¡l pju ®c¢M

ph¡C AÙ» ¢e−u ®c±s¡ ®c±¢s Ll−Rz 5ew ®N−V f§−hÑ ®b−LC HLSe q¡¢hmc¡lpq A¡−l¡ ¢h ¢X A¡l pcpÉ ¢XE¢V Ll¢RmzaMe ®c¢M HLSe cy¡¢sJu¡m¡ ®pe¡ A¢gp¡l h¤−L …¢m¢hÜ AhÙÛ¡u z A¡¢j H¢N−u ¢N−u a¡−L A¡j¡l X¡e h¡ý−a ¢e−u ¢Q¢Lvp¡l SeÉ q¡pf¡a¡−m ¢e−a 5ew

®N−Vl h¡¢q−l ¢eu¡ k¡Ju¡l ¢Q¿¹¡ L¢lz Ipju ®c¢M ¢X¢S, ¢X¢X¢S

j−q¡cu J A¡−l¡ c¤CSe j¢qm¡ X¡š²¡l A¢gp¡l−L ¢pf¡q£ j¤¢qa Hhw

A¡−l¡ 4Se ¢h¢XA¡l pcpÉ clh¡l qm ®b−L h¡l¡¾c¡ ¢c−u ®hl Ll−Rz j¤¢q−al ®qm−jV fs¡ ¢Rm a−h j¤−M¡n fs¡ ¢Rme¡z a¡R¡s¡ a¡l h −¤ L ®ej−fÔV ®c−M a¡−L A¡¢j ¢Qe−a f¡¢lz h¡L£ 4Se ¢h¢XA¡l pc−pÉl ®qm−jV J j¤−M¡n c¤−V¡C fs¡ ¢Rmz g−m a¡−cl−L A¡¢j ¢Q¢e e¡Cz qW¡v HL fkÑ¡−u ¢X¢S J ¢X¢X¢S j−q¡cu HL¢V ¢fm¡−ll p¡−b h−p f−sz aMe A¡¢j ®c¢M ¢pf¡q£ j¤¢qa ¢X¢S J ¢X¢X¢S j−q¡cu−L hСn g¡u¡l Ll−Rz A¡¢j aMe M¤h L¡−RC ¢Rm¡jz A¡j¡l h¡ý−a cy¡¢sJu¡m¡ ®pe¡ A¢gp¡l ¢Rmz ¢pf¡q£ j¤¢qa h−m ®k, n¡m¡ dl−h a¡−LJ …¢m Ll¡ q−hz A¡¢j aMe AÙ»pq m¡C−e Q−m k¡Cz 

The fact of killing of Lieutenant Colonel Enshad

Ibn Amin, Commanding Officer (CO) of Rifles Security Unit (RSU), Dhaka and Lieutenant Colonel

Md. Badrul Huda, Commanding Officer (CO) of 13

Rifles Battalion Dhaka in the Darbar Hall area has

been described in the confessional statement of  No. 75336 Sepoy Md. Saiful Islam CS accused No.61;

the relevant portion of his confessional statement runs

as follows:-

........... we,wW,Avi mßvn Dcj‡¶ U¨vÆy †kv‡Z Ask Mªn‡bi

Rb¨ Rvbyqvix gv‡mi 8 Zvwi‡L XvKvq Avwm| 24/02/09 Bs‡iRx Avwg U¨vÆ †kv‡Z Ask Mªnb Kwi| 25/2/09 Bs‡iRx †fv‡i D‡V bvgvR c‡o Avwg Avevi Nywg‡q hvB| mKvj 9.10/9.20 wgwb‡Ui

mgq ¸wji kã ï‡b Nyg †fs‡M hvq|............bx‡P bvgvi ci 44

ivB‡dj e¨v‡Uwjq‡bi wmcvnx Rmxg Avgv‡K GKwU ivB‡dj †`q| H ivB‡dj wb‡q Avwg `ievi n‡ji cv‡k †RwmI †KvqvUv‡ii mvg‡b

P‡j hvB| H Lv‡b wM‡q Avwg 44 e¨vUvwjq‡bi wmcvnx Kvgvj‡K dvqvi Ki‡Z †`wL| †m `ievi n‡ji w`‡K dvqvi KiwQj| Avgvi

ivB‡d‡j ¸wj bv _vKvq Kvgvj‡K wRÁvmv Kwi †h, ¸wj †Kv_vq cve ? Kvgvj GKwU wi·v †`wL‡q wi·v †_‡K ¸wj wb‡Z e‡j| Avwg wi·v †_‡K 20 ivDÛ ¸wj wbB| Avwg `ievi n‡ji w`‡K 10 ( k)

ivDÛ duvKv ¸wj Kwi| Abygvb 10.45 Uvi w`‡K Avwg `ievi n‡ji mvg‡b ‡dvqviv I gyj †M‡Ui gvSvgvwS ¯nv‡b hvB| H Lv‡b Avwg© Awdmv‡ii jvk c‡o _vK‡Z †`wL| `ievi n‡ji wfZi †_‡K wmcvnx

AvjZvd (44 e¨vUvwjqb) †ei n‡q Avgv‡K `ievi n‡ji wfZ‡i

XyK‡Z e‡j| `ievi n‡j Xy‡K Avwg †÷v‡i mvg‡b DËi † Kv‡b

`uvovB| HLv‡b  wmcvnx  AvjZvd  Avwg©  Awdmvi‡`i‡K jvB‡b `uvwo‡q †ei n‡q Avm‡Z e‡j| AvjZv‡di Kv‡Q †gMv‡dvb wQj|

A¯¿ I wQj| AvjZvd Avwg© Awdmvi‡`i‡K †gvevBj w`‡q w`‡Z e‡j| Avwg `yB Rb Awdmv‡ii `ywU †gvevBj wbB| Gici wmcvnx AvjZvd Avmvgx‡`i‡K jvBb a‡i cwðg w`‡Ki †MB‡U †h‡Z e‡j|

GK Awdmv‡ii w÷K c‡o †M‡j AvjZvd ÷xK Zyj‡Z n‡e bv e‡j agK †`q| Gici Awdmvi‡`i‡K gvP© Kwi‡q cwðg w`‡Ki †M‡Ui

w`‡K wb‡q hvq| Awdmvi‡`i g‡a¨ GKRb †gRi e`i“j Avjg

Avgvi cy‡e©i e¨vUvwjq‡bi wmI wQ‡jb| Awdmviiv `iR vw`‡q †ei

nIqv Ae¯nvq evB‡i †_‡K we,wW, Avi wmcvnxiv eªvk dvqvi K‡i| K‡qK Rb Awdmvi c‡o hvq| mvg‡b †_‡K GKRb Awdmvi Bbkv` m¨v‡ii bvg a‡i †`Šo w`‡Z e‡j| Bbkv` m¨vi `w¶b w`‡Ki †MB‡Ui

w`‡K †`Šo w`‡j Avwg Bbkv` m¨vi‡K `yB ivDÛ ¸wj K wi| Bbkv`

m¨vi c‡o hvb| H mgq Avwg QvovI Avi I A‡bK we,wW, Avi wQj

Zv‡`i‡K Avwg wPwb bv| HLv‡b †h Awdmviiv wQj Zviv mevB ¸wj

†L‡q HLv‡bB c‡o hvq| Abygvb 11.00 Uvi w`‡K Avwg `ievi nj †_‡K †ei n‡q wk¶K‡`i †KvqvU©v‡ii mvg‡b hvB|  

The  DG, Major General Shakil Ahmed  and DDG, Brigadier General M.A. Bari of BDR and many army officers were brutally and barbarously killed by the BDR rebels opening fires and burst-fires

on them near north-west gate and south-east gate of

the Darbar Hall at Pilkhana. Subsequently 38 dead bodies of the army officers were found and recovered

from the mass grave (Gono Kobor) near mortuary of

the BDR hospital. Out of 38 dead bodies, PW 535 Colonel Mohammad Abdul Alim Tarafder identified 30 dead bodies but he could not identify 8

dead bodies as those were decomposed. The dead bodies which were identified by  PW 535 Colonel Mohammad Abdul Alim Tarafder are as follows:-

  1.            BA-1439 Major General Shakil Ahmed, ndc, psc, Director General, BDR.
  2.            BA-2441 Colonel Md. Akhter Hossain, psc, G+, Sector Commander, Chittagong.
  3.            BA-2508 Colonel Shamsul Arefin Ahmed, psc, Sector Commander, Kustia.
  4.            BA-2601 Colonel Md. Shawkat Imam, psc, G+, Sector Commander, Khagrachari.
  5.            BA-2440 Colonel Md. Rezaul Kabir, afwc, Director (Admin), Administrative Directorate.
  6.            BA-2409 Colonel Md. Naqibur Rahman, psc, Sector Commander, Comilla.
  7.            BA-2446 Colonel Nafiz Uddin Ahmed, psc, Commandant Rifle Training Centre and School (RTC&S).
  8.            BA-2526 Colonel Kazi Moazzem Hussain, psc, Sector Commander, Rangamati.
  1.            BA-2324 Colonel Mohammad Moshiur Rahman, psc, Director of Communication Directorate, Dhaka.
  2.      BA-2669 Colonel Md. Emdadul Islam, psc, Sector Commander, Khulna.
  3.      BA-2449 Colonel Quazi Emdadul Haque, psc, Sector Commander, Rajshahi.
  4.      BA-118018 Doctor Lieutenant Colonel Quazi Robee Rahman, Dental Surgeon, BDR Hospital, Dhaka.
  5.      BA-10086 Doctor Lieutenant Colonel Lutfar Rahman Khan, Psychology Specialist, BDR Hospital, Dhaka.
  6.      BA-2806 Lieutenant Colonel Md. Lutfar Rahman, psc, CO of 24 Rifles Battalion, Dhaka.
  7.      BA-2353 Lieutenant Colonel Md. Badrul Huda, CO of 13 Rifles Battalion Dhaka.
  1.      BA-2516 Lieutenant Colonel Md. Saiful Islam @ Saif @ Shahid, GSO-1 (Ops) Operation and Training Directorate, Dhaka.
  2.      BA-1891 Lieutenant Colonel Enshad Ibn Amin, G+, CO of Rifles Security Unit, Dhaka.
  3.      BA-3445 Major Humayun Haider, psc, Int Officer, 36 Rifle Battalion, Dhaka.
  4.      BA-3453 Major Md. Azharul Islam, psc, Second In Command(2IC), 23 Rifle Battalion, Khulna.
  5.      BA-2847 Major Mohammed Saleh, DAAG Administration, Dhaka
  6.      BA-4233 Major Mohammad Maksum-Ul-Hakim, Ops Officer, 24 Rifle Battalion, Dhaka.
  7.      BA-3393 Major Mustaque Mahmud @ Mahmud, psc, Second In Command(2IC), Sadar Rifle Battalion, Dhaka.
  1.      BA-3191 Major Mahmood Hasan, GSO-2 Sector HQ, Dhaka
  2.      BA-3396 Major Mahmudul Hasan, GSO-2 (Intelligence), Operation and Training Directorate, Dhaka.
  3.      BA-3716 Major Mahbubur Rahman.
  4.      BA-4098 Major Md. Mizanur Rahman, GSO-2 (Training) Training Branch, Dhaka.
  5.      BA-2711 Major Quazi Mosaddek Hossain, Second In Command (2IC), 33 Rifles Battalion.
  6.      BA-3689 Major Md. Khalid Hossain, GSO-2 (Cods), Secretary of Director General, Dhaka.
  7.      BA-4762 Major Md. Rafiqul Islam, JAG Head Quarters, BDR, Dhaka.
  8.      RDO-161 DAD Masum Khan, A RO, Recordss Wing.

Place No.2:-  Green room, bathroom, washroom, utensils, behind the cooking pots and inside the toilets of the Darbar Hall.

 It appears from the evidence and the confessional statements of the accused that Lieutenant Colonel Sazzad,  Colonel Zahid, Colonel Reza, Colonel Arefin, Colonel Quazi Emdadul Haque, Major Maksum-Ul-Hakim and many other officers who took shelter at the aforesaid places were atrociously killed by the BDR rebels. When the armed BDR rebels under the leadership of Sepoy Selim Reza entered the Darbar Hall opening fires, at that time DG BDR along with other officers took shelter behind the screen of the stage of the Darbar Hall. Apart from DG and others, in order to save lives, many officers took shelter at green room, bathroom, washroom, utensils, behind the cooking pots and inside the toilets of the Darbar Hall.

Colonel Reza, Colonel Arefin, Lieutenant Colonel Sazzad, Colonel Zahid and PW 25 Lieutenant Colonel Md. Iqbal Hasan took shelter beside the cooking pots at the kitchen. At one stage, the BDR rebels went to the aforesaid places and looked for the army officers who took shelter therein in order to save their lives. The officers who took shelter at the bathroom were brutally killed by the BDR rebels at around 11:00 a.m. The BDR rebels entering the kitchen found the officers who took shelter beside the cooking pots at the kitchen and then Sepoy Sazzad, Sepoy Rubel Miah and Sepoy Shahadat opened burst- fires on the officers killing them mercilessly. At that time, when Sepoy Sumon of 44 Rifle Battalion pushed the cooking pots, Lieutenant Colonel Sazzad who hid therein was seen and then BDR rebel Sepoy Sumon of 44 Rifle Battalion killed him by opening fires on him.

It appears from the evidence of PW 25 Lieutenant

Colonel Iqbal Hasan that this witness was cross-

examined by Sepoy Sazzad Hossain and this witness

stated categorically in his cross-examination that

Sepoy Sazzad Hossain killed Colonel Zahid, Sepoy

Rubel killed Colonel Reza and Sepoy Shahadat killed

Colonel Arefin by opening fires on them. 

The aforesaid fact of killing has been described

by  PW 25 Lieutenant Colonel Md. Iqbal Hasan

who has stated in his evidence as under:-

.........Avwg †jt Kt e`i“j mn MÖxb i“‡g ‡`wL wKQz Awdmvi        †mLv‡b AvZ¥‡Mvcb K‡i Av‡Q| wKQz¶‡bi g‡a¨ AviI A‡bK mk¯¿ BDR  m`m¨ `ievi n‡j Xy‡K co‡j Avwg K‡Y©j AvdZve mn ev_i“‡gi †fbwU‡jUi w`‡q wcQ‡b UvswKi cvwZ‡ji Avov‡j jyKvB|         Abygvb 11 Uvq wcQ‡b ¸wj K‡i †g‡i †djvi AvIqvR ïb‡Z cvB|         Avgiv wcQ‡b ev_i“‡gi g‡a¨ †h me Awdmvi cvwj‡q wQ‡jb Zv‡`i

eªvk dvqvi K‡i †g‡i †d‡j I Zv‡`i AvZ©bvZ ïwb GiB g‡a¨ Aci

ev_i“‡gi †fbwU‡jUi w`‡q K‡Y©j †iRv, K‡Y©j Av‡iwdb, j¨vt K‡Y©j

mvRv` Ges AviI GKRb K‡Y©j Rvwn` G‡m Avgv‡`i g‡a¨ Avkªq MÖnb K‡i| `ievi n‡j me wKQz w’ gZ n‡q hvq| Avgiv ivb vœ N‡i

nvwo cvwZ‡ji g‡a¨ Avkªq MÖnb K‡i _vwK| Gi g‡a¨ 5/6 Rb A¯¿avix ˆmwbK Avm‡j Avwg †Ww¯‹i Avov‡j jyKvB| Zv‡`i g‡a¨ wmcvnx mv¾v`, wmcvnx i“‡ej wgqv, wmcvnx mvnv`Z‡K wPb‡Z cvwi|

Zviv 3 Rb Awdmvi‡`i‡K eªvm dvqvi Ki‡j Awdmviiv jywU‡q c‡i|

Zviv †ei nIqvi mgq GKRb‡K mygb e‡j WvKv I e‡j ZvovZvwo

Avq| wmcvnx mygb 44 e¨vUvwjq‡bi| mygb †ei bv n‡q †WKwP av°v

w`‡q †d‡j †`q Ges †mLv‡b AvZ¥‡Mvcb K‡i _vKv †jt Kt mv¾v`‡K

¸wj K‡i nZ¨v K‡i| Avwg I K‡Y©j AvdZve H gyû‡Z© †e‡P hvB| Avwg ZLb e¨vP Ly‡j †dwj| 25/2 Gkvi Avhv‡bi mgq Rvbj vv †f‡½

evB‡i hvB| c‡i Avwg nvUv ïi“ Kwi| GKRb ˆmwbK wRÁvmv ‡i

†K ? Avwg ewj Avwg evwm Avb‡Z hvB| Avwg ZLb DËi w`‡K iIqvbv

nB| c‡_ 7/8 R‡bi GKwU A¯¿avix `j Avgv‡K †K e‡j wRÁvmv

K‡i| Avwg ewj Avwg Rwni evwk Avb‡Z hvB‡ZwQ| Rvwn‡`i evmvi mvg‡b wM‡q †`wL A‡bK A¯¿avix ˆmwbK cÖ‡Z¨K evmvq Zj−vkx Ki‡Q| Avwg ev‡g ivBcK‡m Xy‡K cwo| Avwg wfZ‡i ei K‡ bemv mvg‡bi bx‡P Xy‡K cwo| Avwg †mLv‡b mvivivZ c‡ii w`bm vivw`b

_vwK|

XXX (wmcvnx mv¾v` û‡mb)

wcjLvbvq Avwg †hvM`vb Kwi BDR nmwcUv‡j       26-

4-08 Zvwi‡L Avwg Wv³vi| wcjLvbv nmwcUv‡j †gvU 27 Rb Wv³vi wQjvg| Zvi g‡a¨ 17 Rb †mbvKg©KZ©v 10 Rb ¯^v¯’ gš¿bvj‡q †emvgwiK wPwKrmK wQj `ievi n‡j 17 Rb wPwKrmi †hvM`vb Kwi|

`ievi n‡ji wfZ‡i hviv wQj Zviv cwðg w`K †M‡U †`Šwo‡q hvq

e‡jwQ 161 avivi Revbe›`x‡Z| Avwg Stage †_‡K 25/30 MR `y‡i Awdmvi‡`i evwo‡Z wQjvg| `w¶b w`‡K `iRv Av‡Q| MÖxb i“g `ievi n‡j c~e© w`‡K Stage Gi `w¶b w`‡K| MÖxb i“‡gi I

ev_i“‡gi `iRv Avjv`v| MÖxb i“‡gi cv‡k¦© ev_i“g| MÖxb i“‡gi

cwð‡g ev_i“g bv|Avwg ev_i“‡gi †fbwU‡jUi w`‡qB evB‡i †ei

nB| †fbwU‡jUi w`‡q †ei n‡q wK‡P‡b cwo| MÖxb i‡g GKeviB hvB|

wK‡P‡bi cv‡k¦© WvBwbs bvB| †WKwP ¸wj wK‡P‡b wQj Avwg Zvi

Avov‡j Avkªq †bB| Bnv mZ¨ b‡n wK‡P‡b eo eo †WKwP wQj bv| Bnv mZ¨ b‡n ev_i“‡gi ‡fbwU‡jUi w`‡q wK‡P‡b hvIqv hvq bvB| Avwg ev_i“‡gi `iRv eÜ Kwi bvB| Avwg wK‡P‡bi `iRv †Lvjvi †Póv Kwi bvB| mv¾v`iv Kv‡K †g‡i‡Q Zv D‡j−L bvB Bnv mZ¨ bq| mv¾v` K‡Y©j Rvnx`‡K ¸wj K‡i nZ¨v K‡i wmcvnx i“‡ej K‡Y©j †iRv‡K nZ¨v K‡i| kvnv`Z nZ¨v K‡i K‡Y©j Av‡iwdb‡K|

The aforesaid fact of killing has been partly

supported and corroborated by the evidence of PW 21

Major Syed Monirul Alam who has stated in his

evidence as follows:-

.............c‡i Avwg Rvbvjv w`‡q †ei n‡Z _vK‡j 5/6 Rb

mk¯¿ we‡`ªvnx ivbœvN‡i Xz‡K Zv‡`i g‡a¨ wmcvnx mv¾v` ,wmcvnx i“‡ej I wmcvnx kvnv`vZ‡K wPb‡Z cvwi Zviv mevB 13 e¨vUvwjq‡bi| Zviv †mbv Awdmvi‡`i eªvkdvqvi Ki‡j †mbv AwdmviMY wPrKvi K‡i jywU‡q c‡o|

It may be mentioned that when the armed BDR

rebels entered the Darbar Hall and scolded the army

officers with filthy languages, at that time, in order to save lives, BA-4233 Major Mohammad Maksum-Ul- Hakim, Ops Officer, 24 Rifle Battalion, Dhaka and PW 21 Major Syed Monirul Alam took shelter under basin of the washroom. At one point of time, the BDR rebels entered the washroom and uttered whether there were any son of bitch therein. At one stage, the BDR rebels came to see Major Maksum-Ul-Hakim and opened fires on him causing bullet injuries wherefrom blood was coming out and at one stage, he fell down on the ground. Injured Major Maksum-Ul-Hakim requested the BDR rebels to send him to hospital as he sustained bullet injuries. The BDR rebels addressed him as son of bitch and uttered to send him to the hospital forever. On that situation, the BDR rebels opened fires on him as a result of which he succumbed instantly to the bullet injuries. The aforesaid fact of

killing has been vividly depicted by PW 21 Major

Syed Monirul Alam who has stated in his evidence as

follows:-

..........Avwg Kvu‡Pi M−vm w`‡q evB‡i ZvwK‡q †`wL wewWAvi Gi we‡`ªvnx m`m¨iv A¯¿ nv‡Z `ievi n‡ji w`‡K GwM‡q Avm‡Q I

dvuKv ¸wj Ki‡Q| wWwR‡K Ab¨ Awdmviiv †NivI K‡i iv‡L| wWwR

cyYivq `iev‡i mevB‡K Avm‡Z e‡j| Avgvi ¯¿x‡K welqUv AewnZ

Kwi| `ievi n‡ji Pviw`‡K cÖPÛ †Mvjv¸wj ïi“ nq| Avwg AvZ¥i¶v‡_© Iqvki“‡g cÖ‡ek Kwi| Avwg I †gRi gvKmygyyj †ewm‡bi

bx‡P AvkÖq †bB| 10/12 Rb m`m¨ A¯¿ nv‡Z `ievi n‡j cÖ‡ek K‡i

I Awdmvi‡`i MvjvMvwj K‡i| Zv‡`i g‡a¨ 44 e¨vUvwjq‡bi wmcvnx

wRqv, wmcvnx ivwReyj‡K wPb‡Z cvwi| Avwg ¯ v’ b cwieZ©b K‡i †ewm‡bi wcQ‡b hvB| Avwg eyS‡Z cvwi wewWAvi m`m¨iv Awdmvi‡`i

†g‡i †dj‡Q| Avgvi cv‡k †gRi gvKmygyj nvwKg wQ‡jb| wKQy c‡i

we‡`ªvnx wewWAvi Iqvk i“‡g cÖ‡ek K‡i I e‡j "wfZ‡i †Kvb KzËvi

ev”Pv AvQ bvwK|" we‡`ªvnxiv †gRi gvKmygyj nvwKg‡K †L `‡Z c q I we‡`ªvnxiv Zv‡K ¸wj K‡i I wZwb hLgcÖvß nb I co‡Z _v‡K| GKch©v‡q wZwb c‡o hvb| wZwb we‡`ªvnx‡`i e‡jb Zvi Mv‡q ¸wj †j‡M‡Q Zv‡K †h nvmcvZv‡j †bIqv nq| we‡`ªvnxiv ZLb e‡j KzËvi ev”Pv‡K AvRxe‡bi gZ nmwcUv‡j cvVv| wmcvnxiv Zv‡K j¶¨ K‡i cyYivq ¸wj Ki‡j wZwb †mLv‡bB gviv hvb| Avwg Zvi kixi †_‡K S‡o Avmv Kcv‡j jvwM‡q ï‡q cwo givi fvb K‡i| we‡`ªvnx‡`i

g‡a¨ GKRb e‡j D‡V wRqv, ivwReyj Pj KzËvi ev”Pviv gviv †M‡Q| BA-2449 Colonel Quazi Emdadul Haque, psc,

Sector Commander, Rajshahi took shelter in the

toilet beside the drain adjacent to the Darbar Hall

when the BDR rebels attacked the Darbar Hall. At one

stage, the BDR rebels came to the toilet and knocked

the door of the toilet asking who was there inside the

toilet and ordered him to come out, otherwise they

would shoot him. One officer from the toilet introduced him as the Sector Commander of Rajshahi

and asked the BDR rebels what they wanted. The

BDR rebels asked him, ‘sir please come out’. When

Sector Commander of Rajshahi came out of the toilet,

the BDR rebels killed him opening fires on him.

The aforesaid fact of killing is evident from the

evidence of PW 21 Major Syed Monirul Alam who

has stated in his evidence as under:-

..........Gi wKQy¶Y ci cwiw¯’wZ wKQyUv kvš— n‡j Avwg `ievi nj msjMœ †Wª‡b ï‡q cwo| Mv‡qi Dci GKUv Kv‡c©U w`‡q †X‡K ï‡q cwo| †Wª‡bi wfZi †_‡K Avgvi Ae¯ v’ b ¯¿x‡K wbwðZ Kwi| 15/20 wgwbU ci K‡qKRb mk¯¿ wewWAvi m`m¨ †Wª‡bi cv‡k¦© G‡m Uq‡j‡Ui `iRv eÜ K‡i| we‡`ªvnxiv e‡j wfZ‡i †K AvQ †ei nI bB‡j ¸wj

Ki‡ev| wfZi †_‡K GKRb e‡j Avwg ivRkvnx †m±i KgvÛvi †Zv iv

wK PvI| we‡`ªvnxiv e‡j I m¨vi Avcwb †ei n‡q Av‡mb| ZLb wZwb

†ei n‡j Zv‡K we‡`ªvnxiv ¸wj K‡i I nZ¨v K‡i| Zviv Avgv‡K †`‡L

bvB|

Place No.3 :- 36 Rifle Battalion Area:

It is evident from the evidence and the confessional statements of the accused that Colonel Md. Mojibul Haque, Lieutenant Colonel Md. Enayetul Haque and Major Md. Mokbul Hossain were brutally killed by the BDR rebels at the 2nd and 4th floor of 36 Rifle Battalion. On 25.02.2009, that is, on the date of occurrence, when a turmoil situation was started at the Darbar Hall of the Pilkhana, the BDR rebels went out of the Darbar Hall running to and fro ignoring the order of DG BDR. At that time DG BDR directed all the commander to control and manage their soldiers. In order to carry out the order of the DG BDR, Lieutenant Colonel Enayet, Commanding Officer (CO) of 36 Rifle Battalion, Colonel Md. Mojibul Haque, Sector Commander, Dhaka and Major Mokbul, Second-In-Command (2IC) of 36 Rifle Battalion went to 36 Rifle Battalion. PW 26 Havildar Md. Bazlur Rashid also went in front of the soldiers line of 36 Rifle Battalion following the aforesaid

with barbar shop of 36 Rifle Battalion. The dead body of Major Mokbul was kept behind the backside of 3- ton vehicle which was standing in front of the shop of MT garage. Subsequently some of the BDR rebels namely Syed, Omar, Jalal and Ekram started shouting in order to remove the dead bodies. Then, at the order of EME Subedar (bearded) and at the presence of Subedar Major Kaiyum and one Subedar (bearded), MT Lance Naik Mozammel, Driver Mahbub, NCE Abul and NCE Jaman put the two dead bodies in the manhole breaking its cover. Subsequently, on 25.02.2009 at aroung 2:30 p.m, the dead bodies of aforesaid officers were found at sewerage gate near Beribadh at Nawabgonj under Lalbag Police Station. The aforesaid fact of killings is palpable from the evidence of  PW 26 Havildar Md. Bazlur Rashid who has stated in his evidence as follows:-

............`ievi nj †_‡K 36 e¨vUvwjq‡b hvIqvi c‡_ K‡b©j

gywdR, †jt Kt Gbv‡qZ †gRi gKey‡ji m‡½ †`Lv nq| AvwgZ v‡`i wcQ‡b 36 e¨vUvwjq‡b ˆmwbK jvB‡bi mvg‡b hvB| hvIqvi mgq K¨vw›U‡bi  mvg‡b  ‡R.wm.I  my‡e`vi  knx`yi  ingvb,  bv‡qK Bw`ªm, bv‡qK my‡e`vi AvwRR, bv‡qK my‡e`vi kvnRvnvb bvt e m` yvi ‡ mvB`yi ingvb, bv‡qK my‡e`vi ev‡Zb, bv‡qK my‡e`vi Kwei Dw, Ïbbvt myt Lv‡qi, bvt myt mnKvix Avjx AvKei, my‡e`vi GKivgyj nK  ,my‡e`vi

Avt gv‡jK, my‡e`vi evix, my‡e`vi Bwjqvm, nvwej`vi vn kRvnvb, nvwej`vi BDmyd, nvwej`vi Igi, wmcvnx eRjyi iwk` Ges j¨vt bv‡qK Av‡bvqvi mn A‡bK‡K civgk© Ki‡Z †`wL| Avwg 4_© Zjvq B †Kv¤úvbx‡Z hvB| nvwej`vi †gRi kvnRvjvj 4_© Zjvq cÖ‡ek K‡i I mKj‡K †ei n‡Z e‡j| Avwg wmwoi mvg‡b my‡e`vi †gRi kn w`yi Gm.Gg.wR  mn  †`wL|  nvwej`vi  Igi,  my‡e`vi  GKivgyj,  wmcvnx eRjyi iwk` I j¨vÝ bv‡qK Av‡bvqvi mn A‡b‡K K‡b©j gywRe, †jt

Kt Gbv‡qZ‡K wb‡q 4_© Zjvq D‡V| Avwg wmwoi mvg‡b †`wL K‡b©j gywRe‡K GKUv K‡¶ wb‡q hvq| †jt Kt Gbv‡qZ‡K Ab¨ K‡¶ wb‡q hvq|  Avwg  cwðg  cv‡k¦©  eviv›`vq  ˆn  ‰P  ïb‡Z  cvB|  c‡i †`wL

nvwej`vi BDmyd, wmcvnx eRjy, j¨vt bv‡qK Av‡bvqvi A¯¿ nv‡Z cwðg †_‡K cye© w`‡K Avm‡Z‡Q| K‡b©j gywR‡ei N‡i  nvwej`vi BDmyd cÖ‡ek K‡i| nvwej`vi BDmyd Zvi nv‡Z nv‡Z _vKv A¯¿ w`‡q K‡b©j gywRe‡K ¸wj K‡i| nvwej`vi BDmyd I j¨vt bv‡qK A‡bvqvi

2 Rb K‡b©j gywR‡ei jvk 4_© Zjv †_‡K †d‡j †`b| c‡i ‡jt Kt Gbv‡q‡Zi jvk my‡e`vi knx` I Ab¨ Rb 4_© Zjv †_‡K †dj ‡ †`q|

Avwg wmwo w`‡q wb‡P bvgvi mgq 2q Zvjv †M‡j M.L.S.S mvBdzwÏb

e‡j †gRi gKeyj 2q Zvjv cwðg cv‡k¦© Av‡Q| ZLb wmcvnx Avjxg

†iRv cwðg cv‡k¦©i i“‡g hvq A¯¿ nv‡Z †gRi gKeyj‡K †m ¸wj K‡i

nZ¨v K‡i| Avwg Ae¯ v’ †eMwZK †`‡L Avgvi miKvix evmfe‡b P‡j

hvB|

The aforesaid fact of killings also stands

supported by the evidence of PW 37 Naib Subedar

Sheikh Abul Qddus of 36 Rifle Battalion who has

stated in his evidence as follows:-

...........25-2-09 Zvwi‡L mKvj 8.50 wgt 36 e¨vUvwjq‡b

AvMgb Kwi| ZLb AwdmviMY wWwR Gi `iev‡i wQj| Avwg 36

e¨vUvwjqb bv‡qK mnKvix iwdKzj Bmjvg I j¨vÝ bv‡qK mnKvix wRqvDwÏb m‡½ Awd‡m †`Lv Kwi| Zviv Avgv‡K Awabvq‡Ki Rb¨ A‡c¶v Ki‡Z e‡j| mgq 9.40 wgt ¸jv¸wj kã ïwb ZLb Avwg

ZLb ˆmwbK jvB‡bi mvg‡b Avwm| ZLb my‡e`vi †gRi kwn`  yiingvb bv‡qK my‡e`vi Bw`ªm bv‡qK my‡e`vi AvwRR bv‡qK myvi ‡e k `vnRvnvb

Avjx, bv‡qK my‡e`vi mvB`yi ingvb, my‡e`vi evKx, bK v‡q my‡e`vi

ev‡Zb,  bv‡qK  my‡e`vi  gwgbDwÏb,  bv‡qK  my‡e`vi  Aveyj v‡q Li, bv‡qK my‡e`vi mnKvix Avjx AvKei, nvwej`vi kvnRvjvj  ,nvwej`vi

BDmyd Avjx, nvwej`vi Igi Avjx, wmcvnx eRyji iwk`, j¨vÝ bv‡qK

Av‡bvqvi“j Bmjvg, bv‡qK k¤¢y Kzgvi kg©v, nvwej`vi byi“j Bmjv‡g

36  e¨vUvwjq‡bi  Ab¨vb¨‡`i  m‡½  D‡ËwRZ  Ae¯ v’ q  A¯¿  mnKv‡i K_vevZ©v  I  civgk©  Ae¯ v’ q  †`wL|  wKQz  ¶‡bi  g‡a¨  BDwb‡Ui AwabvqK  †jt  K‡Y©j  Gbv‡qZzj  nK  I  K‡Y©j  gwReyj  nK  †`Š‡o e¨vUvwjq‡bi  mvg‡b  Av‡m|  ZLb  my‡e`vi  ‡gRi  knx`yi  ingb v, nvwej`vi Igi Avjx, my‡e`vi GKivgyj nK, wmcvnx eRjyi w ik` j¨vÝ

bv‡qK Av‡bvqvi“j Bmjvg mn Av‡iv A‡b‡K m¨vi‡`i wb‡q ˆmwbK jvB‡bi 4_© Zvjv hvq| c‡i 4_© Zvjv ¸wji kã ïwb| NUbv Rvbvi

Rb¨ mgq M.L.S.S mvBdyj‡K †`wL| †m wPrKvi K‡i e‡j †gRi gKeyj mv‡ne  GB w`‡K Av‡Q ZLb wmcvnx Avjxg †iRv gKeyj m¨vi‡K ¸wj K‡i nZ¨v K‡i| Zv‡`i 3wU jvk Dci †_‡K wb‡P †d‡j

†`q|

The aforesaid fact of killing of the army officers

stands supported by the confessional statement of No.

25829 Havildar Md. Yusuf Ali CS accused No.75;

the relevant portion of his confessional statement runs

as follows:-

........Aaxfl B¢jJ e¡−uh p¤−hc¡l HÉ¡XS¤−V¾V C¢âp 36 hÉ¡V¡¢mu¡−e ¢N−u AÙ»N¡l ®b−L 1¢V SMG, ¢eCz C¢âp ®eu 1¢V

¢fÙ¹mz Bj¡−cl AÙ» −eh¡l SeÉ A−eL …−m¡ ®m¡LS−el j−dÉ e¡−uh p¤−hc¡l Bë¥m B¢SS Hl Lã öe−a f¡Cz B¢j 2¢V jÉ¡N¡¢S−e 15

l¡Eä L−l 30 l¡Eä …¢m ®eCz Hlfl 1ew ®N−Vl ¢c−L H−p ®c¢M ØV£−ml ®Qu¡−l ¢pf¡q£ B¢mj ®lS¡ q¡−a SMG ¢pf¡q£ hSm¤ q¡−a

1¢V ¢fÙ¹m mÉ¡x e¡−uL B−e¡u¡−ll q¡−a 1¢V L¡−m¡ lw Hl ¢fÙ m¹ , q¡¢hmc¡l ®L¡u¡VÑ¡l j¡ØV¡l n¡q£c¤m Cpm¡j q¡−a SMG Hhw a¡l

pLm ØV¡gl q¡−a SMG J ¢fÙ¹mz L¡−l¡ q¡aM¡¢m e¡Cz e¡x p −¤ hc¡l B¢SS Bj¡−L 4 am¡u EW−a h−m L¡le ®pM¡−e e¡¢L 2 B¢jÑ f¡lpe m¤¢L−u B−Rz 4 am¡ °p¢eL m¡C−e ¢N−u ®c¢M p¤−hc¡l ®jSl n¡q£c

q¡−a SMG , C.Q p¡Cc q¡¢hmc¡l Jjl, q¡¢hmc¡l hSm¤, q¡¢hmc¡l

n¡q S¡m¡m, p¤−hc¡l BLl¡j H−cl fÊ−aÉ−Ll q¡−a SMG J ¢fÙ¹mz

−qX LÓ¡ÑL BLhl f−l l¡C−gm ¢e−u B−pz 4 am¡u f§hÑ f¡−nÄÑ L−Z mÑ

j¤¢Sh J ®mx L−ZÑm He¡−ua p¡−qh−L f¢ÕQj f¡−nÄÑ ®c¢Mz BHM S¡m¡m Hl ®r¡i ¢Rm ®mx L−ZÑm He¡−ua Hl Eflz Aaxfl e¡−uh p¤−hc¡l B¢S−Sl ¢e−cÑ−n mÉ¡x e¡−uL B−e¡u¡l J ¢pf¡q£ hSm l¤ ln£c

…¢m L−l ®mx L−ZÑm He¡−ua p¡−qh−L …¢m L−l qaÉ¡ L−lz Aaxfl ®qX LÔÑ¡L BLh−ll ¢e−cÑ−n B¢j 4bÑ am¡u L−ZÑm j¤¢Sh¤m qL-®L 2 l¡Eä …¢m L−l qaÉ¡ L¢lz Aaxfl BHM n¡qS¡m¡−ml ¢e−c −Ñ n

pLm ®L¡Çf¡e£l ®L¡u¡VÑ¡l j¡ØV¡ll¡ Eš² 2¢V m¡n 36 hÉ¡−V¢mu¡−el e¡¢faM¡e¡l p¡−b m¡N¡−e¡ f¡¢el f−u−¾Vl ¢eLV l¡−Mz aMe p¡Dc,

Jjl, S¡m¡m, HLl¡j, pL−m ¢QvL¡l L−l m¡n…−m¡ p¢l−u ®gm−a

h−m 36 hÉ¡V¡¢mu¡e ®b−Lz m¡n…−m¡ pl¡C Hj¢V mÉ¡x e¡−uL ®j¡S¡−Çjm, XÊ¡Ci¡l j¡qh¤h, NCE Bh¤m NCE- S¡j¡ez ®pM¡−e

Ef¢ÙÛa ¢Rm BlJ p¤−hc¡l ®jSl L¡CEj, p¤−hc¡l (c¡y¢sJu¡m¡)z C,Hj,C p¤−hc¡l (c¡¢sJu¡m¡) Hl ¢e−cÑ−n m¡n 2¢V jÉ¡e−q¡−ml X¡Le¡

®i−‰ ¢ia−l ®g−m ®cJu¡ quz Hlfl ¢pf¡q£ Bm£j ®lS¡ J cf¹¹l£ p¡Cg¥¢Ÿe ¢j−m ®jSl jLh¤m ®L qaÉ¡ L−l Bj¡l p¡j−e z ®jSl jLh¤−ml m¡n MT NÉ¡−l−Sl ®c¡L¡−el p¡j−e c¡ys¡−e¡ 3 Ve N¡¢sl ¢fR−e l¡M¡ quz

The aforesaid fact of killing of the army officers

stands supported by the confessional statement of No.

57264 Sepoy Md. Alim Reza CS accused No.80; the

relevant portion of his confessional statement runs as

follows:-

..........Abygvb 9.15 Uvi w`‡K wcjLvbvi wfZ‡i †Mvjv¸wji kã ïwb| †kvbvi mv‡_ mv‡_ j¨vÝ bv‡qK jvj wgqv †`vZjvi nvmcvZv‡ji †MU eÜ K‡i †`q| c‡i i³v³ RLgx i“Mxiv Avmv

ïi“ n‡j †cŠ‡b GMviUvi w`‡K †MU Ly‡j †`q| ZLb evwn‡ ihvIqvi my‡hvM bv †c‡q e¨v‡Uwjqvb wM‡q nvwRi nB| nvwRi nev ici †`L‡Z cvB †h, c‡i e‡jb ïwb‡Z cvB †h, †m±i KgvÛvi K‡Y©j gywReyj nK

Ges 36 ivB‡dj e¨v‡Uwjq‡bi CO ‡j: K‡Y©j Gbv‡qZyj nK †K †K

ev Kvnviv gvwiqv †d†j‡Q Ges †`L‡Z cvB †h cvwbi c‡q‡›Ui cv‡k Zv‡`i‡K avix (euv‡ki PvUvB) w`‡q ‡cPvq ivL‡Q| Gici Avwg Ávb

nvivq †dwj| Gici mvBdzwÏb (Gg.Gj.Gm.Gm) †Rv‡i †Rv‡i wPrKvi K‡i ej‡Z _v‡K †h †gRi gKeyj, e¨v‡Uwjq‡bi Dc AwabvqK, †eu‡P Av‡Qb| Avwg ˆmwbK jvB‡bi wbPZjv n‡ZG KwU Gm,Gg,wR †`L‡Z †c‡q †mUv wb‡q †`vZjvi w`‡K hvB| Avwg HGm,Gg.wR w`‡q †gRi gKeyj‡K ¸wj Kwi| KqUv ¸wj KiwQ †Lqvj

bvB| Avwg Gici wb‡P †b‡g wM‡q jvB‡b wM‡q Pvicvqvi Dci ky‡q cwo| `ycy‡i Gm.Gg.wR wb‡q †L‡Z hvB|

The aforesaid fact of killing of the army officers

stands supported by the confessional statement of No.

MLSS-36 Md. Saifuddin Miah CS accused No.88;

the relevant portion of his confessional statement runs

as follows:-

..........bv‡qK Igi Avjx G‡m e‡j †h, `ievi n‡j eªvk dvqvi

n‡”Q| wmcvnx knx`I wmcvnx bvwRg GKB K_v e‡j| Gi 5 wgwbU

c‡i 30/35 Rb wmcvnx, †K‡gv †MwÄ I dzjc¨v›U civ, wmI K‡Y©j Gbv‡qZ, †m±i KgvÛvi gywRe I ‡gRi gKeyj †K wN‡i wb‡q Awd‡mi w`‡K Av‡m| wmI Gbv‡qZ m¨vi †m±i KgvÛvi K‡Y©j gywRe m¨vi‡K e‡jb †h m¨vi Avcwb Avgvi Awd‡m e‡mb, Avwg MÛ‡Mvj _vvq Avwm|..........wKQz¶‡bi g‡a¨ Pviw`K †_‡K 300/400 Rb wmcvnx

A¯¿ nv‡Z ¸wj Ki‡Z Ki‡Z e¨v‡Uwjqvb Awdm wN‡i ¸wj Ki‡Z _v‡K Ges e¨viv‡K e¨viv‡K A¯¿ wb‡q D‡V hvq| wmcvnx‡`i †ekxi f ‡Mi

gyL euvav wQj| Zv‡`i g‡a¨ _vKv 36 ivB‡d‡ji nvwej`vi BDmyd,

j¨vÝ bv‡qK Av‡bvqvi, wmcvnx eRjy, wmcvnx Avjxg †iRv, wmcvnx knx`, wmcvnx wbRvg Giv ivB‡dj nv‡Z Ges nvwej`vi BDmyd I wmcvnx Avjxg †iRvi nv‡Z Gm,Gg,wR wb‡q Zviv mevB Awd‡mi wewfbœ RvqMvq hvq| wmI mv‡n‡ei iæ‡g nvwej`vi BDmyd, wmcvnx Avjxg †iRv, wmcvnx eRjy I j¨v: bv‡qK Av‡bvqvi Xz‡K| Zviv Awd‡mi wfZ‡i ¸wj K‡i me wKQz fvsPzi K‡i|......... Dc‡i †Mvjv¸wji kã cvB| Avwg Awd‡mi wcQb w`‡q †ei n‡Z wM‡q †`wL K‡Y©j gywRe I †j: K‡Y©j Gbv‡qZ m¨v‡ii i³v³ jvk c‡o Av‡Q| Avwg Gici eviv›`vi GKw`‡K `vwo‡q †Kvbw`‡K hve wPšÍv Ki‡Z _vwK| Ggb mgq †`wL GKUv jvk Dci †_‡K wb‡P coj| †`wL †h †hUv †gRi gKey‡ji jvk|.......... e¨viv‡K cvwb †L‡ZwM ‡q †`wL †h, nvwej`vi BDmyd Zvi mv‡_ gy‡Lvk evav 4/5 Rb ˆmwbK‡K b w‡q Wvówe‡b c‡o _vKv †nvMjv w`‡q K‡Y©j gywRe, †j: K‡Y©j Gbv‡qZ I †gRi gKey‡ji jvk †e‡a wb‡q mvB‡Kj M¨v‡i‡Ri wcQ‡b iL vv wcK

Avc Mvwo‡Z DVvq|

The aforesaid fact of killing of the army officers

stands supported by the confessional statement of

JCO/4555 Naib Subedar Shahjahan Ali CS accused

No.74; the relevant portion of his confessional

statement runs as follows:-

..........11.30 Uvi w`‡K BDmyd (nvwej`vi) G‡m eªvk dvqvi

K‡i e‡j hviv GL‡bv A¯¿ †bbwb, Zviv G¶ywb A¯¿ †bb; Zv bv n‡j ¸wj K‡i gviv n‡e| GB K_v ï‡b f‡q Avwg †Kv‡Z wM‡q ivB‡dj I

20 ivDÛ ¸wj wbB| ˆmwbK jvB‡b G‡m ‡`wL K: gywRe I †j: K: Gbv‡qZ Ges †g: gKeyj Gi jvk c‡o Av‡Q|..........Zvici †ejv 1

Uvi w`‡K H ¯’v‡b †`wL jvk †bB| K¨vw›U‡bi eqMb e‡j †h, nvwej`vi BDmyd 2/3 Rb †jvK wb‡q Pick up G wb‡q †M‡Q|

Place No.4: At the backside of MT line of 13 Rifle Battalion area:

The evidence of prosecution witnesses and the confessional statements of the accused, indicates that Lieutenant Colonel Md. Lutfar Rahman, psc, Commanding Officer (CO) of 24 Rifles Battalion, Dhaka was killed by the BDR rebels opening gunshots on him at the backside of MT line of 13 Rifle Battalion. From the evidence, it has come into sight that on 25.02.2009, when a disordered and chaotic situation arose at the Darbar Hall, in order to perform the duty as per order of the DG BDR, Lieutenant Colonel Md. Lutfar Rahman came to his own office at the 1st floor of 24 Rifle Battalion and remained in his office. After a while, Subedar Major Gofran Mollik informed his Commanding Officer (CO) Lieutenant Colonel Md. Lutfar Rahman that he had to go at 13 Rifle Battalion as all the officers were there. After some times, under the leadership of armed Subedar Major Gofran Mollik, the armed BDR rebels namely Havildar Taher, Lance Naik Karim, Sepoy Emran Chowdhury, Sepoy Azim Patowary, Sepoy Arafat Hossain, Sepoy Mizanur Rahman, Sepoy Sohrab Mollik and other armed BDR rebels brought out Lieutenant Colonel Md. Lutfar Rahman from his office at gunpoint and at around 11:00 a.m took him at the backside of MT line of 13 Rifle Battalion along the front street of DG Bungalow dragging, beating, humiliating and dishonouring him. Thereafter Sepoy Azim Patowary CS accused No.17, the driver of Lieutenant Colonel Md. Lutfar Rahman tied up the eyes of his own unit’s Commanding Officer (CO) with

The aforesaid fact of killing of  Lieutenant

Colonel Md. Lutfar Rahman has been described in

the evidence of  PW 24 Lieutenant Colonel Md.

Ashif Abdur Rouf who has stated in his evidence

among others as follows:-

........ mKvj 10 Uvq wWwR fe‡bi GjvKv †_‡K ¸jv¸wji kã ïb‡Z cvB| Avwg evmvi `iRv e›` K‡i †`B| Abygvb 10.45 wgt GKRb ˆmb¨ Avgvi evmv Avµgb K‡i `iRv †fs‡M| ZLb evmvq Avgvi ¯¿x 2 mš—vb Batman I  WªvBfvi Amy¯’ gv I 24 e¨vUvwjq‡bi cvPK wgjb wQj| Zv‡`i N‡ii †g‡S ï‡q ivwL| we‡`ªvnxiv hLb dvqvi K‡i Avwg 2 nvZ Dc‡i Zz‡j ¸wj Ki‡Z wb‡la

Kwi I Zv‡`i wb‡`©k gvb‡Z PvB| Avwg Zv‡`i g‡a¨ wmcvnx dqmvj‡K wPb‡Z cvwi| Avgv‡K mcwiev‡i evmv †_‡K †ei K‡i wb‡q hvq| hvIqvi mgq 24 e¨vUvwjq‡bi AwabvqK jyrdi ingvb‡K av°vavw° gviai Ki‡Z †`wL|Avwg Zv‡`i g‡a¨ †Mvdivb gwj−K, nvwej`vi Zv‡ni, Avt Kwig, wmcvnx AvwRR, wmcvnx Bgivb, wmcvnx wgRvb, wmcvnx AvivdvZ‡K wPb‡Z cvwi| †Mvdivb gwj−K‡K A¯¿nv‡Z †bZ…Z¡

w`‡Z †`wL| c‡i Rvwb we‡`ªvnxiv †jt Kt jyrdi ingvb wewWAvi

ˆmb¨iv nZ¨v K‡i‡Q| Avgv‡K †KvqvU©vi MvW© wb‡q hvIqv Kv‡j 24 e¨vUvwjq‡bi w`K †_‡K K‡qKRb we‡`ªvnx †`Š‡o G‡m dvKv dvqvi K‡i I Avgv‡K ivB‡d‡ji evU w`‡q AvNvZ K‡i, wKjNywl gv‡i| Avwg gvwU‡Z c‡o hvB| Zviv Av‡iv AvNvZ K‡i Avwg gviv †h‡Z cvwi g‡b

K‡i D‡V `vwo‡q †KvqvUvi Mv‡W©i w`‡K nvU‡Z _vwK| ZLb Zviv Avgv‡K mcwiev‡i wcÖRb †m‡j e›`x K‡i iv‡L Ab¨‡`i ms‡M| 

The aforesaid fact of killing has also been

described in the evidence of PW 12 Major Md. Shah

Alam who has stated in his evidence, inter alia, as

follows:-

..........BDR mßvn 2009 ZvwiL Avgvi 24 ivB‡dj          e¨vUvwjqb‡K mvs¯‹„wZK Abyôv‡bi `vqxZ¡ †`Iqv nq| GB `vwq‡Z¡i mvgMÖxK KvR Kg© †`Lvïbvi Rb¨ 25/2/09 mKvj 6.15 wgt P.T     drees XvKv †mKU‡i `w¶‡b Mjd gv‡V Dcw¯ Z’ nB|.......... mKvj 8.45 wgt Avwg bv¯—v Kivi Rb¨ 24 ivB‡dj e¨vUvwjq‡b Avgvi Awdm K‡¶ hvB| bv¯ v— †L‡q Pv LvIqvi mgq 24 e¨vUvwjq‡bi DËi

w`‡K ¸jv¸wjI PxrKv‡ii ïwb| ZLb mgq Abygvb 9 21 Uv|

..........†ek wKQz mg‡qi ci Avwg cwiw¯ w’ Z ch©‡e¶‡bi Rb¨ Store

i“g Gi `iRvi cv‡k `vovB Ges `iRv dvK w`‡q †`wL AwabvqK †jt

K‡Y©j jyrdi‡K wmcvnx Ggivb †PŠt nvwej`vi Zv‡ni wmcvnx AvwRg cv‡Uvqvix, j¨vÝ bv‡qK Kwig wmcvnx AvivdvZ Ges my‡ev `i †gRi †Mvdivb gwjK− mn Av‡iv K‡qKRb mk¯¿ Ae¯ v’ q AwabvqK‡K wN‡i †d‡j‡Q  Ges  Zv‡K  gviwcU  Ki‡Z  Ki‡Z  †U‡b  wnP‡i DG  Gi

evs‡jvi w`‡K wb‡q hvB‡Z‡Q| Avwg cybivq H i“‡gi e‡·i gv‡S e‡m

_vwK Abygvb 14.00 NwUKvq Avwg BDR ˆmwbK‡`i ejvewj Ki‡Z

ïwb 33 Rb †mbv Awdmvi‡K nZ¨v Kiv n‡q‡Q Ges wKQz mgq ci ci wPrKvi ïwb|

The  aforesaid  fact  of  killing  has  also  been

described in the evidence of  PW 14 Naik Enamul

Haque who has stated in his evidence, inter alia, as

follows:-

.........MZ 25/2/09 ZvwiL mKvj 6.15 wgt Avwg 24 ivB‡dj              e¨vUvwjq‡bi wmMbvj IqvK©m‡c `vwq‡Z¡ Avwm|  mKvj 6.30 wgt KZ©‡e¨ wb‡qvwRZ nB| mKvj 9Uv 30 wgt cÖ_‡g K‡qKwU ¸wji kã ïb‡Z cvB|...... c‡i Avwg evivÜvq Avwm| wKQz¶b ci †`wL      AwabvqK jyrdi ingvb `ª“Z †n‡U G‡m †`vZjvq Zvi Awd‡m Ae¯ v’ b      †bb| ZLb †`wL †mvnive gwjK− m‡½ nvwej`vi Zv‡ni j¨vÝ bv‡qK         Kwig wmcvnx Ggivb, wmcvnx AvwRg cv‡Uvqvix wmcvnx AvivdvZ û‡ b

Ges wmcvnx wgRvbyi ingvb mn AviI A‡b‡K mk¯¿ Ae¯ v’ q 24 e¨vUvwjq‡bi Awdm GjvKvq Av‡m| c‡i AwabvqK j~rdi mv‡ne‡K †U‡b wnP‡o bx‡P bvwg‡q Awd‡mi mvg‡bi iv¯ v— w` q Acgvb RbK

fv‡e DG Gi Kvh©¨vj‡q w`‡K P‡j hvq|

The aforesaid fact of killing has also been

described in the evidence of PW 22 Major Abdullah

Al Mamun who has stated in his evidence, inter alia,

as follows:-

...........25/02/09 Zvwi‡L mKvj 9Uvq †Mvjv¸wji kã ïb‡Z

cvB| †`vZvjv evmvi Rvbvjv w`‡q †`wL 24 e¨vUvwjq‡bi eviv›`v

20/25 Rb wewWAvi m`m¨ mk¯¿ Ae¯ v’ q wPrKvi Ki‡Q †KD †KD ¸wj Ki‡Q| Zviv `ªZ A¯¿ wb‡Z ej‡ZwQj| Avwg NUbv Rvbvi Rb¨ ` Zª Awd‡m P‡j Avwm I Awd‡mi eviv›`vq 7/8 Rb K¬vK© I ivbvi‡K †`L‡Z cvB| GKRb ivbvi G‡m Avgv‡K cvwj‡q †h‡Z e‡j Ges e‡j wewWAvi-iv we‡`ªvn K‡i‡Q I K‡qKRb‡K nZ¨v K‡i‡Q| Avwg `ªZ evmvq P‡j Avwm I cyYivq Awd‡m Avmvi †Póv Kwi| cyivZb wWwR fe‡bi w`K †_‡K Avgvi evmvi w`‡K 2/3 Rb wewWAvi mk¯¿ Ae¯ v’ q Avm‡Q| Avwg wcQb w`K w`‡q Awd‡m Avmvi †Póv Kwi| ZLb`wL 24 e¨vUvwjq‡bi AwabvqK †jt K‡Y©j jyrdi‡K 7/8 Rb we‡`ªvnx †U‡b wnP‡o 24 e¨vUvwjqb †_‡K wb‡q hvB‡ZwQj| Zviv K‡Y©j jyrdi‡K gviwcU K‡i| G‡`i K‡qKRb‡K wPwb| Zviv n‡jb my‡e`vi g †Ri †Mvdivb gwj−K, nvwej`vi Zv‡ni, j¨vt bv‡qK Avt Kwig, wmcvnx Bgivb, wmcvnx AvivdvZ Ges wmcvnx AvwRg cv‡Uvqvix| Ab¨‡`i wPb‡Z cvwi bvB| H mk¯¿ `j †jt K‡Y©j jyrdi‡K AviI `y‡ iwb‡q

†M‡j Avwg †`Iqvj UcwK‡q Avgvi †m±‡ii Awd‡m Avwm|

The aforesaid fact of killing has also been

described in the evidence of  PW 34 Havildar Md

Abdul Malek who has stated in his evidence, inter

alia, as follows:-

....... MZ 25/2/09 Zvwi‡L `ievi n‡j hvB| 9 NwUKvq `ievi

ïi nq| wWwR g‡nv`‡qi K_v ejvi GK ch©v‡q Abygvb 9-20 wgt 3 e¨vUvwjq‡bi wmcvnx gvBbDwÏb A¯¿ nv‡Z `ievi n‡ji wfZ‡i g‡Âi

w`‡K wWwR Gi w`‡K hvq I A¯¿ ZvK K‡i `vovq| GKRb Awdmvi wmcvnx gvBb‡K wbi¯¿ K‡i| ZLb fire Gi kã ïb‡Z cvB| GK

ch©v‡q wewWAvi m`m¨iv `ievi nj Z¨vM K‡i| Avwg `ievinj ‡_‡K

†ewi‡q Avwm I wmMbvj †mKU‡i †gBb †M‡U Avwm I Mvox I Pick- up ‡`wL| Avwg Wvbw`‡K ZvwK‡q 200/250 wewWAvi m`m¨ †`wL| Zviv A¯¿ †ei Ki‡Q I Dj−vk Ki‡Q|........c‡i jvB‡bi eviv›`vq

G‡m †`wL GKRb ˆmwbK gy‡L jvj Kvco evav| c‡i wb‡P †‡ bg gmwR‡`i mvg‡b Avwm| †mLv‡b 49826 wmcvnx kvn Avjg‡K A¯¿ mn †`wL ¸wj Ki‡Z| †ejv 11 Uvq K‡qKRb wewWqvi GKRb Awdmvi‡K

13 e¨Uvwjqv‡bi mvg‡b a‡i wb‡q Av‡m| Zv‡`i g‡a¨ 24 e¨vUvwjq‡bi †Mvdivb gwj−K‡K †`L‡Z cvB| H Awdmvi wQj ‡jt Kt jyrdi

ingvb| c‡i  fire  Gi kã ïwb| Avwg ZLb Awdm wewìs G P‡j Avwm| mviv iv‡Z 13 e¨vUvwjqb gv‡V Mvoxi kã ïwb| 2/3 wU Pick-

up eviv›`v w`‡q †`wL| 10/12 Rb wewWAvi m`m¨‡K K_vevZ©v ej‡Z †`wL| Gg.wc †M‡i‡Ri cv‡k my‡e`vi Ryev‡qi‡K †`wL| ci ‡ 3 Uv UªvK Av‡m| Mvox ‡_‡K †b‡g my‡e`vi Ryev‡q‡ii m‡½ GKR bK_v e‡j| UªvKwU c‡i †M‡i‡R P‡j hvq| mvivivZ Mvox †_‡K jvk bvg‡Z

†`wL| H GjvKvq NyivNywi Ki‡Z †`wL| †fv‡i 13 e¨vUvwjq‡b gvwU DPz †`wL| Awdmvi‡`i nZ¨vi c‡i g„Z‡`n †mLv‡b gvwUPvcv †`q|

The fact of killing of Lieutenant Colonel Md.

Lutfar Rahman and 8/10 army officers has been

supported and corroborated by  CS accused No-34

Sepoy Md. Emran Chowdhury who was the runner

of deceased Lieutenant Colonel Lutfur Rahman. It

appears from the confessional statement that the

aforesaid accused Sepoy Md. Emran Chowdhury

killed his own Commanding Officer (CO) of 24 Rifle

Battalion by opening fire on him at the backside of

MT line of 13 Rifle Battalion. The aforesaid accused

has stated in his confessional statement as follows:-

..........24/2/09 Bs ZvwiL mKvj 6 Uvi w`‡K Nyg †_‡K D‡V bv¯Ív K‡i †cvkvK c‡o Avwg 24 ivB‡d‡ji Awd‡m hvB|........H w`b

mܨv 7.30 Uvi w`‡K Mvwo wb‡q m¨v‡ii evmvq hvB| m¨vi ¯^cwiev‡i c¨v‡iW MÖvD‡Û wM‡q UvÆz †kv †`‡L| ivZ 8.00 Uvi w`‡K m¨v‡ii k¦vïix‡K wb‡q kvnRvnvbcy‡i hvB| †mLvb †_‡K †divi c iivZ Abygvb 10.00 Uvi w`‡K Avwm| 24 ivB‡dj e¨vUvwjqv‡bi my‡e`vi †gRi Gm,Gg †Mvdivb gwj−‡Ki Awd‡m wgwUs G nvwRi nB| wgwUs

I Avwg, my‡e`vi †gRi †Mvdivb gwj−K wm I †j: K‡Y©j jyrdi ingvb m¨v‡ii WªvBfvi AvwRg cv‡Uvqvix, nvwej`vi Zv‡ni (24 ivB‡dj e¨v‡Uwjqvb), I j¨vÝ bv‡qK Kwig (24 ivB‡dj e¨‡Uwjqvb)

nvwRi wQjvg| wgwUs G wm×všÍ nq †h, ciw`b 25/2/09 Bs ZvwiL `ievi n‡j Awdmvi‡`i wRw¤§ Kiv n‡e Ges cÖ‡qvR‡b nZ¨v Kiv n‡e| †Mvdivb Avgv‡K e‡j †h, `ievi n‡j MÛ‡Mvj n‡j †Zvgvi wmI mv‡ne Awd‡m P‡j Avm‡Z cv‡i| Avm‡j Avgv‡K †m‡U Zv Rvbv‡ev| ZLb Avwg Awd‡m hve|...... Gici 25/2/09 Bs ZvwiL mKvj 7.00

Uvi mgq Awd‡m hvB| Awd‡m m¨v‡ii †Uwej cwi¯‹vi K‡i 7.30 Uvi

w`‡K Mvwo wb‡q m¨v‡ii evmvq hvB| m¨v‡ii WªvBfvi wmcvnx AvwRg cv‡Uvqvix Mvwo WªvBf K‡i| m¨vi‡K wb‡q mKvj 8.00 Uvi w`‡K Awd‡m Avwg| m¨vi Awd‡m wKQz¶b KvR K‡ib| †cŠ‡b 9.00 Uvi mgq m¨vi‡K wb‡q `ievi n‡ji w`‡K iIbv nB| 9 Uv evRvi 5 wgwbU

Av‡M `ievi n‡j †cŠQvB| m¨vi‡K bvwg‡q w`‡q Mvwo wb‡q c¨v‡iW MÖvD‡Û wM‡q †mLv‡b Mvwo cvK© Kwi I †mLv‡b _vwK| Avgvi nv‡Z IqvwKUwK wQj| mKvj mv‡o bqUvi w`‡K `ievi n‡ji w`K †_‡K

¸wji kã cvB|........ WªvBfvi AvwRg cv‡Uvqvix m¨v‡ii Mvwo wb‡q

Avgv‡K wKQz bv e‡j P‡j hvq| ZLb `ievi n‡j cÖPÛ †Mvjv ¸wji

kã kywb|.........gmwR‡`i MvW© i“‡g Ae¯ v’ b Kv‡j wm I m¨vi‡K

†dvb Ki‡j m¨vi †dvb wiwmf K‡i| Avwg m¨v‡ii Kv‡Q Ae¯v’ Rvb‡Z

PvB Ges m¨vi‡K `ievi nj †_‡K †ewi‡q Avm‡Z ewj| m¨vi e‡jb

†h, wZwb `ievi nj †_‡K †ei n‡Z cvi‡Qb bv| wKQz ¶b ci m¨vi‡K

†dvb Ki‡j m¨v‡ii †dvb eÜ cvB|.........Gici Avwg 24 ivB‡d‡j

e¨v‡Uwjqv‡bi †KvZ G wM‡q A¯¿ †bB| Avwg GKUv ivB‡dj †bB hvi

b¤^i 441 Ges †m m‡½ 20 ivDÛ¸wj †bB| BwZg‡a¨ my‡e`v i‡gRi

†Mvdivb gwj−K IqvwKUwK‡Z Avgv‡K Awd‡m †h‡Z e‡j| Avwg Awd‡m hvB Ges †mLv‡b 24 ivB‡dj e¨v‡Uwjqv‡bi nvwej`vi Zv‡ni,

j¨vÝ bv‡qK Kwig, wm I m¨v‡ii WªvBfvi AvwRg cv‡Uvqvix, wmcvnx AvivdvZ‡K Dcw¯ Z’ †`wL| Zv‡`i mevi nv‡Z A¯¿ wQj| Gi wKQz¶b

ci BDwbdg© cwiwnZ Ae¯ v’ q wm I †j: K‡b©j jyrdi ingvb m¨v †`Š‡o Awd‡m Av‡m Ges Zvi Awdm K‡¶ e‡m| my‡e`vi †gR i †Mvdivb gwj−K wmI m¨vi‡K e‡j †h, Avcbv‡K 13 ivB‡dj e¨v‡Uwjqvb †h‡Z n‡e, †mLv‡b mKj Awdmviiv Av‡Qb| Avgiv ZLb

wmI †K wb‡q 13 ivB‡dj e¨v‡Uwjqvb hvB| 13 ivB‡dj e¨v‡Uwjqv‡bi

MÖvD‡Û Avwg 8/10 Rb Awdmvi †K †`wL wmcvnxiv A¯¿ ZvK K‡i `vo Kwi‡q †i‡L‡Q| Avgiv wmI †j: K‡b©j jyrdi ingvb‡K 13i vB‡dj e¨v‡Uwjqv‡bi GgwU jvB‡bi wcQ‡b wb‡q hvB| wmI m¨v‡ii WªvBfvi wmcvnx AvwRg cv‡Uvqvix jvj Kvco w`‡q wm I mv‡n‡ei †PvL euv‡a,

iwk w`‡q wcQ‡b nvZ euv‡a| Avwg Avgvi ivB‡dj w`‡q wm I mv‡ne‡K

¸wj Kwi| wm I mv‡ne †mLv‡b c‡o hvb| †Mvdivb gwj−K Avgv‡K

†mLvb †_‡K P‡j †h‡Z e‡j| ZLb Avwg 13 ivB‡d‡ji mvg‡b iv¯Ívq

G‡m `vovB|....... weKvj Abygvb 3.00 Uvi w`‡K Avwg, Avgv‡`i wmI

mv‡n‡ei ivbvi wmcvnx AvivdvZ, †gRi AvwR‡Ri ivbvi wmcvnx mvBdyj, Avgv‡`i wmI mv‡n‡ei WªvBfvi wmcvnx AvwRg cv‡Uvqvix, †gm I‡qUvi mwdK mn wmI †j: K‡Y©j jyrdi ingv‡bi evmvq hvB| †mLv‡b fvsPzi Kwi, Ab¨vb¨iv jyUZivR K‡i| †gm I‡qUvi mwdK I WªvBfvi wmcvnx AvwRg cv‡Uvqvix g¨vWv‡gi ¯^Y©vj¼vi †bq| Avgiv Gici 24 ivB‡dj e¨v‡Uwjq‡b †diZ Avwm| mevB jvB‡b _vwK| 25/2/09 Bs ZvwiL w`evMZ iv‡Z wmcvnx mvBdzj, wmcvnx AvivdvZ, wmcvnx AvwRg cv‡Uvqvix, my‡e`vi †gRi †Mvdivb gwj−Km n wm I mvn‡ei evmvq hvB| mevB wg‡j wm I mv‡n‡ei ¯¿x I Zvi ‡Q‡j †g‡q‡K G‡b †Kw›`ªq †KvqvU©vi Mv‡W© wb‡q hvB|

Place No-5: Junior Comission Officer’s (JCO’s)

Mess Area near Golf ground and Rifle Sports

Board (RSB) field.

It is apparent from the evidence of the prosecution witnessed and the confessional statements of some of the accused that BA-5108 Major Abu Syed Ghazzali Dastagir, OIC, Eastern Desk Rifles Security Unit (RSU), Dhaka was killed by the BDR rebels opening fires on him at JCO’s Mess Area near golf ground and RSB field. Coming across the evidence and confessional statements it appears that due to disordered situation at the Darbar Hall, the DG BDR directed all the commanders to control the troops of their respective unit’s. Following the order of DG BDR, PW 3 Lieutenant Colonel Abu Tasnim, Major Mokbul and Major Gazzali started for their own unit’s from the Darbar Hall. On the way to Signal Sector, Lieutenant Colonel Abu Tasnim happened to meet Major Mokbul and Major Gazzali near swimming pool. When Major Gazzali reached RSB field near golf ground adjacent to JCO’s Mess, 6/7 BDR rebels namely Naik Wazed, Sepoy Mamun, Naib Subedar Fazlul Karim, Havildar Anisuzzaman, Signalman Sepoy Motiur and others assaulted and beat him

mercilessly and at one point of time, they killed him

opening fires on him. After killing the dead body of

Major Gazzali was carried by the BDR rebels namely

Naib Subedar Fazlul Karim, Havildar Anisuzzaman, Signalman Sepoy Motiur Rahman along the road in

front of Signal Sector keeping the same on the jute

sack and fell the dead body at the manhole removing

the cover, which was situated beside the western side

of the primary school near RSU and Signal Sector.

After throwing the dead body at the manhole, the BDR

rebels again covered it with its cover.

The aforesaid fact of killing has been vividly

narrated by  PW. 3 Lieutenant Colonel Md. Abu

Tasnim who has stated in his evidence, amongst

others, as follows:-

...........25-2-09 Zvwi‡L wW.wR g‡nv`q `iev‡i wQ‡jb `ievi n‡j| `ievi ïi“ nIqvi 4/5 wgwbU c~‡e© `ievi n‡j †cŠw QZLb

Abygvb 8.55 wgt n‡e mKv‡j| mKvj 9.00 NwUKvq `ievi ïi“ nq|.........DG mv‡ne wb‡`©k †`b take care of troops Avwg wb‡`©k †c‡q `ievi nj †_‡K †ei nB | Ges Signal Sector  Gi

D‡Ï‡k¨ iIqvbv †`B| hvevi mgq †`L‡Z cvB exi DËg byi †gvnv¤§`

¯‹z‡ji Kv‡Q †dvqvivi cv‡k GKwU Pick Up Mvox `vwo‡q Av‡Q| 2/3

Rb ˆmwbK A¯¿ mn Mvox †_‡K †b‡g‡Q| Signal Sector  hvIqvi

c‡_ Swimming Pool Gi Kv‡Q †gRi gKeyj I †gRi Mv¾vjxi m‡½ †`Lv nq| Zviv Avgv‡K e‡j Sir Rank Ly‡j †djyb| Avwg Lywj bvB| Zvici Zviv 2 Rb P‡j hvq| Avwg J.C.O’s Mess Gi KvQvKvwQ hvB| ZLb †gRi Mv¾vjx‡K 6/7 Rb ˆmwbK wcUv‡”Q †`wL| Avwg ZLb `vjv‡bi cv‡k jywK‡q hvB| ZLb Avwg wPrKvi ïwb I ¸wji kã cvB| GKUz ci Avwg †ei nB ZLb bv‡qK my‡e`vi dRjyj Kwig nvwej`vi AvwbQz¾vgvb, bv‡qK Iqv‡R` ˆmwbK gwZDi ingvb mn Av‡iv wKQz ˆmwbK A¯¿ mn Qvjvi Dci Mv¾vjx mv‡n‡ei g„Z †`n

wb‡q hv‡”Q|

The aforesaid fact of killing has also been

testified by PW. 20 Major Kamrul Hasan who has

stated in his evidence, amongst others, as follows:-

...........MZ 25/2/09 wewWAvi Gi gnvcwiPvj‡Ki `ievi wQj| Avwg `iev‡i †hvM`vb Kwi| Awdmvi‡`i  1g mvwi‡Z vS eive‡i e‡mwQjvg| wWwR mKvj 9Uvq `ievi ïi“ K‡ib| mKvj 9-26 wgwb‡U 13 e¨vUvwjq‡bi wmcvnx gvBb `ievi n‡j mk¯¿ cÖ‡ek K‡i wWwR Gi w`‡K A¯¿ ZvK K‡i a‡i| ZLb mKj ˆmwbK `vwo‡q hvq| wWwWwR wmcvnx gvB‡bi A¯¿ wb‡q Zv‡K wbi¯¿ K‡i| ZLb `ievi n‡ji wfZi †_‡K 'Rv‡Mv' e‡j kã K‡i| ZLb mevB‡K wWwR e‡jb Avcbviv mK‡j emyb Avwg mK‡ji K_v ïb‡ev| wewWAvi m`m¨iv `ievi nj Z¨vM Ki‡Z _v‡K| wWwR mevB‡K `ievi nj Z¨vM Ki‡Z wb‡la K‡i| Zvic‡iI wewWAvi m`m¨iv `ievi nj Z¨vM Ki‡Z _v‡K| `iRv Rvbvjv †fs‡M Zviv †ei n‡Z _v‡K| mKj Awdmvi‡`i wbqš¿Y K ‡Z e‡jb| c‡i GB Av‡`‡ki ci Avwg `ievi n‡ji gvS eivei P‡j

Avwm| evB‡i ¸wji kã ïb‡Z cvB| g‡Âi Kv‡Q Zv‡K †`wL wmcvnx gvBb AÁv‡bi fvb K‡i g‡Â ï‡q Av‡Q| Dcw¯ Z’ Awdmviiv wmcvnx gvB‡bi kv‡U©i eyZvg Ly‡j †mev K‡i| Avwg wWwR Gi Av‡‡ `k `ievi n‡ji evB‡i †ei nB|........Avwg c¨v‡iW MÖvD‡Ûi cvk w`‡q Mjd MÖvD‡Û Avwm| c‡i R.S.B gv‡V †gRi Mv¾vjx‡K 6/7 Rb wewWAvi m`m¨‡`i  wb‡q  †h‡Z  †`wL|  Zv‡`i  g‡a¨  ˆmwbK  gvgyb,  bv‡qK Iqv‡R`‡K wPb‡Z cvwi| Zviv †gRi Mv¾vjx‡K gvi‡Z gvi‡Z wb‡q hvw”Qj|

The  aforesaid  fact  of  killing  has  also  been

depicted by PW 30 Tarun Kanti Roy who has stated

in his evidence, amongst others, as follows:-

..........MZ 25-2-09 ZvwiL `ievi n‡j `ievi wQj| H w`b

BDR ivBcK‡mi †LZve cÖv߇`i m¤§v‡b cyi¯‹vi weZi‡bi Abyôvb wQj|  H  Abyôv‡b  Avgvi  Dci  gvBK  Acv‡iU‡ii  `vqxZ¡ wQj|..........MZ 25-2-09 mKvj 8 Uvq wmMbvj †mKUi IqvK©m‡c

1

Avwm| mgq 92 Uvq `ievi nj †_‡K ¸wji kã ïwb| eviv›`vq G‡m

`vovB| ZLb `ievi nj †_‡K †dir Avmv ˆmwbK‡`i gva¨‡g R b‡Z cvwi `ievi n‡j we‡`ªvnx BDR m`m¨iv †mbv Awdmvi‡`i Avµgb

K‡i‡Q| Avwg cybivq IqvK©k‡c cÖ‡ek Kwi| mgq 12 Uvq Avgvi ¯ x¿

mš v—b‡`i K_v wPš—v K‡i  evmvi w`‡K iIqvbv nB| wmMbvj Awd‡mi mvg‡b iv¯—vq Avm‡j †`wL wKQz msL¨K we‡`ªvnx ‰mwbK A¯¿ nv‡Z wmMbvj jvB‡bi mvg‡b Ges K¨vw›U‡bi cwðgcv‡k QzUvQzwU Ki‡Q| Zv‡`i ga¨ †_‡K wmMbvjg¨vb mvjvDwÏb‡K A¯¿ nv‡Z D‡ËwRZ ‡`wL I fire Ki‡Z †`wL Ges Zvi mv‡_ we‡`ªvnx‡`i ej‡Z

kywb †mbv Awdmvi‡`i †h Lv‡b cv‡e †mLv‡bB ¸wj K‡i nZ¨v Ki|

GKRb Awdmvi †hb evP‡Z bv cv‡i| H mgq bv‡qK my‡e`vid Rjyj

Kwig nvwej`vi AvwbQz¾vgvb Ges wmMbvj gwZDi ingvb mn GKwU

P‡Ui g‡a¨ jvk wb‡q wmMbvj †m±‡ii mvg‡bi iv¯—v w`‡q hvB‡Z

‡`wL| we‡`ªvnx‡`i ej‡Z ïwb GUv †gRi Mv¾vjxi jvk| ¸wji kã

Kg‡j Avwg evmvq P‡j hvB|

The very fact of killing of the aforesaid army

officer stands supported by the confessional statement

of No. 29425 Havildar Signal Md. Anisuzzaman CS

accused No.94; the relevant portion of his

confessional statement runs as follows:-

..........Na 25/02/09 ¢MËx a¡¢l−M pL¡m p¡−s 7 V¡u ¢eEj¡−LÑV ®j−pl SeÉ j¡R ¢Le¡l E−Ÿ−nÉ k¡Cz pL¡m p¡−s 8 V¡l ¢c−L CE¢e−V j¡R ¢e−u Q−m B¢pz pL¡m Be¤j¡¢eL −p¡u¡ 9 V¡l ¢c−L

°p¢eL ®j−pl j¡wp Be¡l SeÉ Lp¡C M¡e¡l E−ŸnÉ lJe¡ L−l nq£c

¢je¡−ll L¡−R k¡Ju¡ j¡œ ®c¢M clh¡l q−ml ¢cL q−a °p¢eLl¡ ®c±s¡−c±¢s L−l Bp−R aMe clh¡l q−ml ¢cL ®b−L 2/1 ¢V …¢ml në f¡Cz............. f¤el¡u 11/11.30 V¡l ¢c−L ¢eSü CE¢e−V B¢pz

aMe Q¡l¢c−L fÐQä ®N¡m¡…¢m q¢µRmz.......... aMe ®hm¡ 12 V¡/12.05

¢j¢eV Hl ¢c−L B¢j p‰£u e¡−uh p¤−hc¡l gSm¤m L¢ljpq m¡C−el

¢c−L k¡Ju¡l pju BC,He,¢V q−a Be¤j¡¢eL 55/65 NS f¢ÕQ−jl

¢c−L ¢Ve ®p−Xl f¡−n ®jSl N¡‹¡m£ p¡−q−hl m¡n f−s b¡L−a ®cM−a f¡Cz aMe m¡−nl f¡−n e¡−uL Ju¡−Sc 24 l¡C−gm hÉ¡V¡¢ ue

pwk¤š² ¢pNeÉ¡m ®pƒl−L l¡C−gm pq c¡y¢s−u b¡L−a ®c¢Mz p¡−b l¢‰e L¡f−s j¤M h¡yd¡ 03 Se °p¢eL AÙ»pq c¡y¢s−u ¢Rmz Bj¡l p¡−b b¡L¡

e¡−uh p¤−hc¡l gSm¤m L¢lj ®jSl N¡‹¡m£ pÉ¡−ll m¡n ¢Qe−a f¡−lz

®jSl N¡‹¡m£ pÉ¡−ll N¡−u ®N¢” Hhw fl−e Bä¡l Ju¡l ¢Rmz e¡−uL

Ju¡−Sc Hhw p‰£u j¤−M¡p f¢l¢qa AÙ»d¡l£ ¢h¢XBl °p¢eLl¡

Bj¡−cl−L m¡n¢V hq L−l ¢pNeÉ¡m ®pƒ−ll l¡Ù¹¡l ®no j¡b¡u ¢e−u

®k−a B−cn L−lz B¢j J gSm¤m L¢lj m¡n hq−e Aü£L¡l Ll−m Bj¡−cl−L AÙ» d−l ar¥¢e M¤e L−l ®gm¡l ýj¢L ®cuz h¡dÉ q−u H w

iu ®f−u Bjl¡ pÇja qCz e¡−uL Ju¡−Sc ¢pNeÉ¡m jÉ¡e °p¢eL

j¢ae−L A¢g−pl h¡l¡¾c¡ q−a m¡−nl f¡−n ¢e−u B−pz ®jSl N¡‹¡m£

p¡−q−hl m¡n¢V fÔ¡¢ØV−Ll Q−Vl hÙ¹¡l Efl ®l−M dl¡d¢l L−l 60/70

NS f§hÑ ¢c−L l¡Ù¹¡l Efl jÉ¡e−q¡−ml f¡−n ¢e−u k¡Cz ®pM¡−e 2 Se

j¤Mh¡d¡ AÙ»d¡l£ °p¢eL B−N ®b−LC c¡y¢s−u ¢Rmz f−l m¡n¢V jÉ¡e−q¡−ml ¢ial ®g−m ®cu¡ quz B¢j ®jSl N¡‹¡m£−L M e¤ q−a

®c¢M e¡Cz a−h f¢l¢ÙÛ¢a j−a d¡le¡ L¢l ®k, e¡−uL Ju¡−Sc p‰£u

AÙ»d¡l£ ¯p¢eL ®cl ¢e−u ®jSl N¡‹¡m£−L M¤e L−l−Rz

The very fact of killing of the aforesaid army

officer stands supported by the confessional statement

of  No. 46697 Naik Signal Wazedul Islam CS

accused No.96; the relevant portion of his

confessional statement runs as follows:-

..........25/02/09Cw a¡¢lM A¡¢j  g¢me L¢l Hhw 8.15 ¢j¢e−V clhl q−m clh¡−l Ef¢ÙÛa qCz A¡j¡l p¡−b q¡x ¢pNeÉ m ®j¡Ù¹¡¢gS¤l lqj¡e J e¡−uL a¡−uh¤l lqj¡e ¢Rmz A¡e¤j¡¢eL 9V¡l

¢c−a clh¡l öl¦ quz 9.20 ¢j¢e−V clh¡−ll p¡j−e hp¡ L−uLSe

°p¢eL qW¡v cy¡¢s−u f−s Hhw HC pju ®N¡m¡…¢ml A¡Ju¡S ö¢ez ¢fR−e ph¡C aMe ®hl qJu¡l SeÉ ®c±s¡−c±¢s öl¦ L−lz A¡¢j J−cl

p¡−b ®hl q−u k¡Cz..........A¡¢j aMe ®L¡−a ¢N−u l¡C−gm (h¡V 428)

Hhw 40 l¡Eä …¢m −eCz A¡¢j Y¡L¡ ®pƒ−ll f¡n ¢c−u ¢pNeÉ¡m ®pƒ−ll ¢c−L ®k−a b¡¢Lz aMe e¡x ¢pNeÉ¡m ®a¡g¡−‹−ml p¡−b −cM¡

quz Jl q¡−a Hp Hj, ¢S ¢Rmz f−l 2Se HLp¡−m œ²£s¡ −h¡−X lÑ j¡−Wl ¢ial ¢c−u ®S ¢p J ®j−pl ¢c−L k¡Cz ®S ¢p J ®j−pl ¢eQ

am¡l f¢ÕQj f¡−nl h¡l¡¾c¡u AhÙÛ¡e ®eC, 11V¡l ¢c−L ®S ¢p J ®j−pl Ešl f¡−n f¡C¢R f¡C¢R A¡Ju¡S ö¢ez A¡Ju¡S ö−e 5/6 S j¤−M¡nd¡l£ AÙ»pq ®c±¢s−u ¢fL A¡−fl L¡−R ®b−L ¢QvL¡−ll S¡uN¡u k¡C Hhw ¢LR¤rZ fl 3Se ¢h¢XA¡l ®f¡o¡L fl¡ ®m¡L−L ¢e−u A¡h¡l ¢fL¡−fl ¢c−L k¡uz A¡¢j J ®a¡g¡‹m AÙ»pq J−cl p¡−b k¡C Hhw

HLSe A¢gp¡l−L ¢S‘¡p¡ L¢l ®k ®j¡h¡Cm ®L¡b¡u Hhw E¢e aMe

A¡‰¥m ®c¢M−u h−me ®k LÉ¡−fl j−dÉ ®j¡h¡Cmz A¡¢jJ ®a¡g¡‹m LÉ¡−fl ¢c−L k¡C Hhw ®c¢M ®k NË£e LÉ¡−fl ¢e−Q ®j¡h¡Cmz ®j¡h¡Cm¢V

¢e−u H−p ®c¢M I ¢fLA¡f¢V A¢gp¡l−cl ¢e−u Q−m ®N−Rz aMe A¡¢j

J ®a¡g¡‹m f§−hÑl S¡uN¡u ¢N−u h¢pz IM¡−e hp¡l f−l HL¢V Lm

A¡−p Hhw h−m ®Lje A¡−Rez aMe A¡¢j h¢m −k Ee¡−L L−uLSe

d−l ¢e−u ®N−Rz p£j L¡XÑ M¤−m ®c¢M Ee¡l e¡j ®jSl N¡‹m£z ¢pj

M¤−m ®g−m  ®cCz 11.45 ¢c−L ®S ¢pJ ®jp ®b−L −mx L−Zm Ñ aR¢mj−L L−uL Se ®m¡L d−l ¢e−u k¡uz a¡l¡ RSB Hl ¢h¢XA¡l

pcpÉz ¢pNeÉ¡m ®pƒ−ll ¢c−L ¢e−u k¡uz A¡¢j aMe ¢pNeÉ¡m ®pƒ−ll

¢c−L Q−m A¡¢pz A¡¢j kMe p¡j−e k¡C aMe ®c¢M e¡−uL p¤−hc¡l gSm¤m L¢lj, q¡h¢mc¡l A¡¢eR¤‹¡j¡e Hhw ¢pNeÉ¡m jÉ¡e j¢aEl

lqj¡e Q−Vl j−dÉ L−l m¡n ¢e−u k¡−µRz A¡¢j ®c¢M lš² S−j A¡−Rz

Jl¡ m¡n ¢e−u l¡Ù¹¡l h¡jf¡n ¢c−u RSU- Hl f¡−n fСCj¡l£ ú −¥ ml

f¢ÕQj f¡−nÄÑl  jÉ¡e®q¡−m ®g−m ®cuz ®jSl N¡‹¡m£−L …¢m L−l j¡l¡

quz Hlfl A¡¢j A¢g−p Q−m A¡¢p z

The very fact of killing of the aforesaid army

officer stands supported by the confessional statement

of No. 70034 Sepoy Signal Md. Motiur Rahman CS

accused No.95; the relevant portion of his confessional statement runs as follows:-

............Avwg wcjLvbvq wmMb¨vj ‡m±i Awdm GjvKvq dz‡ji Mv‡Q cvwb †`qvi Kv‡R wb‡qvwRZ wQjvg|..........25/2/09 Zvwi‡L cÖwZw`‡bi b¨vq dzjMv‡Q cvwb w`‡Z Avwm| mKvj Abygvb mv‡o bqUvi w`‡K †jvKRb †`Šov‡`Šwo Ki‡Z †`wL| BDR  iv mevB BDwb‡Ui w`‡K hv‡”Q| Gici ¸wji AvIqvR ïwb| ZLb Avwg cvwbi jvBb eÜ

Kivi Rb¨ wmMb¨vj Awdm wewìs Gi †`vZjvq hvB| ¸wji AvIqvR

†ekx nIqvi Kvi‡b Abygvb 2 N›Uv ILv‡bB Ae¯ v’ b Kwi| Gici wb‡P wmuwoi mvg‡b Avwm| bv‡qK Iqv‡R‡`i mv‡_ ILv‡b †`Lv nq| Zvi nv‡Z A¯¿ wQj| Avgv‡K A¯¿ wb‡Z e‡j| Avwg bv wb‡Z PvB‡j ey‡K A¯¿ a‡i fq †`Lvq| ILvb †_‡K Iqv‡R` Avgv‡K wb‡q TMO

m¨v‡ii Mvwoi M¨v‡i‡Ri w`‡K †b‡q hvh| ZLb Abygvb ev‡ivUv †mvqv ev‡ivUv ev‡R| ILv‡b Avi 03 Rb A¯¿avix BDR †K †`wL| ILv‡b Avgv‡K GKUv jvk ai‡Z e‡j| jvkUv M¨v‡i‡Ri cv‡k c‡i wQj|

c‡i ï‡bwQ IUv †gRi mv¾vwj mv‡n‡ei jvk| ILv‡b bv: my‡e`vi

dRjyi Kwig I nvwe: wmMb¨vj AvwbQ Dcw¯ Z’ wQj| Avgv‡K w`‡q jvk DVv‡q wb‡q †gBb iv¯Ívi cv‡k g¨vb‡nv‡ji cv‡k ivL‡Z e‡j| Avgv‡K

I AvwbQ I¯Ív`‡K P‡j †h‡Z ej‡j Avgiv P‡j Avwm| dRjyj m¨vi‡K ILv‡b `vovq _vK‡ZB †`wL| g¨vb‡nv‡ji cv‡k AviI 02 Rb BDR A¯¿avix wQj| Gici †`wL Iqv‡R` mn Iiv jvkUv g¨vb‡nv‡j XzKvq

†`q|

The very fact of killing of the aforesaid army

officer stands supported by the confessional statement

of  JCO/ 5982   Naib Subedar Signal Md. Fazlul

Karim CS accused No.93; the relevant portion of his confessional statement runs as follows:-

........... 25/2/09 ZvwiL mKvj mv‡o AvUUvq `ievi n‡j hvIqvi D‡Ï‡k¨ wmMb¨vj ˆmwbK e¨viv‡Ki mvg‡b djBb K‡i `ievi n‡j hvB| Abygvb 9 Uvi w`‡K DG g‡nv`q mvjvg wb‡q `ievi ïi“

K‡ib| `ievi n‡j Avwg †RwmI †Pqv‡ii wcQ‡bi w`‡K ewm|.........Avwg n‡ji mvg‡b G‡m †`wL K‡Y©j gywRe m¨vi mn Ab¨vb¨ m¨viiv †ei n‡q G‡m e‡j `ievi n‡j wKPz nq bvB| Avcbvi

`ievi †Q‡o hv‡eb bv| GB K_v ejvi mv‡_ mv‡_ ¸wji AvIqvR

cvB| H mgq †gRi gKeyj m¨vi‡KI ILv‡b †`wL| Gici Avevi 2

ivDÛ dvqvi nq| †jvKRb ‡QvUvQzwU Ki‡Z _v‡K| Avevi eªvk dvqvi

nq| Avwg myBwgs cy‡ji mvg‡b w`‡q Avgvi †g‡m P‡j Am vw|.......... Abygvb 11 Uvi w`‡K Avevi Avi wc †cv‡ó hvB| ILv‡b wM‡q ïwb wKQz

BDR †Rvqvb wmMb¨vj †m: KgvÛvi Avey Zvmwjg (†j: K‡b©j) †K wcUv‡Z wcUv‡Z Avgv‡`i WvBwbs n‡ji bZzb KbóªvKkb wewìs G wb‡q †M‡Q|............. Zvici Avwg ILvb †_‡K †g‡mi w`‡K iIbv †`B|

M¨v‡i‡Ri Kv‡Q G‡m †gRi Mv¾vjx m¨v‡ii †WW ewW †`L‡Z cvB| m¨v‡ii evg nv‡Z ¸wj we× †`wL| ci‡b Rvw½qv †MwÄ I †Qov BDwbdg© civ Ae¯ v’ q †`wL| Gici ILv‡b nvwe: AvwbQ‡K †`wL| bv‡qK Iqv‡R` gyL euvav 2 RbB D wb‡q Av‡m mv‡_ nvwZqvi wQj|

Iiv ‡WWewW MvDÛ wmU wewQ‡q Zvi Dci Zz‡j wb‡q DËi w`‡K †gBb †M‡Ui w`K w`‡q RSU GjvKvi cvk w`‡q wmMb¨v‡ji GjvKvq wb‡q hvq| Avwg I mv‡_ hvB| ILv‡b AviI A¯¿ nv‡Z 2 Rb BDR †`wL|

gwZqvi Avgv‡`i gvwji KvR K‡i| I mn mevB wg‡j †WW ewWUv

g¨vb‡nv‡ji XvKvbv Ly‡j †d‡j †`qv nq| XvKbv jvwM‡q ` †qv nq| Zvici Avwg Avevi †RwmI †g‡mi w`‡K hvB|

Place No-6: Bir Shrestho Noor Mohammad Public School and College

It appears from the evidence that  BA-5306 Major Muhammad Mosharof Hossain, ATO, Q

and Ord. Branch, Dhaka was killed by the BDR rebels inside Noor Mohammad Public School and College. On 25.02.2009, when DG BDR was delivering speeches on Dal-Vhat Programme and other issues, the entire meeting descended into tumultuous, unruly, confused and turbulent situation due to shouting and firings opened by the BDR rebels. On

that situation, at one stage, PW 74 Major Doctor Rounak Azad Ani and Major Mosharof with others came out of the Darbar Hall, went to the Bir Shrestho

Noor Mohammad Public School and College running,

entered the tuition collection room beside the gate of the school and took shelter in two small boxes of the counter. Entering the room, they hid themselves therein shutting the door. At around 2:30 p.m at noon, 3 armed BDR rebels namely Sepoy Altaf, Sepoy Bashar and Sepoy Haider entered the room breaking open the door. The aforesaid BDR rebels brought out Major Mosharaf from the small box of the room at the

veranda scolding, pulling and dragging him therefrom. The BDR rebels compelled Major Mosharaf at the veranda and ordered him to move back. As soon as Major Mosharaf moved back, the BDR rebels killed him opening fires on him. Receiving bullet injuries, Major Mosharaf fell down on the veranda. At that moment, PW 74 Major Doctor Rounak Azad Ani was luckily saved as he she introduced herself as a lady doctor and told them that she used to provide treatments to them and to their wives and children.   

In respect of Killing of Major Md. Mosharaf

Hossain, an eye witness  PW 74  Major Doctor

Rounak Azad Ani has stated in his evidence as

under:-

...........Avwg 25/2/09 Zvwi‡L BDR nvmcvZvj Lady

Medical Officer wn‡m‡e Kg©iZ wQjvg| H w`b mKvj 9.00 Uvi wKQz Av‡M Avwg Avgvi mnKg©x‡`i mv‡_ `ievi n‡j †cŠwQ|AvbygvwbK mKvj 9.00 Uvi mgq D.G  g‡nv`q `iev‡i Dcw¯ Z’ nb| cweÎ †KviAvb †ZjvIqv‡Zi gva¨‡g `ievi ïi“ nq| D.G g‡nv`q `iev‡i

Dcw¯ Z’ mKj‡K mvjvg Rvwb‡q e³e¨ ïi“ K‡ib| Dbvi e³e¨ PjvKvjxY mg‡q nVvr †`Ljvg GKRb mk¯¿ wmcvnx gvCb `iev‡ii `w¶b cvk¦© w`‡q A¯¿ mn Stage G I‡V D.G g‡nv`‡qi w`‡K †m

A¯¿ ZvK K‡i| mv‡_ mv‡_ evwK Awdmviiv Zv‡K a‡i †d‡j Ges †m Stage c‡i hvq| gyû‡Z©i g‡a¨ `ievi n‡j wek„•Ljv c‡o hvq| h †

†hw`‡K cv‡i †ei n‡q †h‡Z _v‡K| H mg‡q `ievi n‡ji evwn‡i KvQvKvwQ GKwU ¸wji AvIqvR ïb‡Z cvB| Ab¨vb¨‡`i mv‡_ AvwgI

`ievi n‡ji evwn‡i †ei n‡q hvB Rvbvjv w`‡q| †ei n‡q †gRi

†gvkvid‡K †`L‡Z cvB| wZwb Avgv‡K wbivc` ¯’v‡b †h‡Z e‡j Ges

Dwb wb‡RI gv‡Vi ga¨ w`‡q †`Šov‡Z _v‡K| Avwg Zv‡K Abymib Kwi| ‡`Š‡o Avgiv b~i †gvnv¤§` ivB‡djm cvewjK ¯‹zj GÛ K‡j‡Ri

†MB‡Ui wfZ‡i Xy‡K hvB| ¯‹z‡ji †MB‡Ui cv‡k¦© †eZb msÖ‡ Mni i“‡g Avwg I †gRi †gvkvid Ges BDR Gi GKRb my‡e`vi I 2 Rb

†emvgixK Kg©Pvix i“‡gi wfZ‡i Xy‡K “ i‡gi g‡a¨ _vKv KvD›Uv‡ii

2wU †QvU †Lv‡ci g‡a¨ Avkªq †bB| wfZi †_‡K `iRv eÜ K‡i Avgiv

wfZ‡i jywK‡q _vwK| †ejv Abygvb 11.00 Uvi mgq K‡qKRb we‡`ªvnx

BDR m`m¨ i“‡gi evwn‡i G‡m MvwjMvjvR K‡i Ges Avgv‡`i‡K i“g

†_‡K †ei nIqvi Rb¨ ej‡Z _v‡K| Avgiv wfZ‡i †Kvb kã Kwiwb

Ges †Kvb DËi †`Bwb| c‡o Zviv P‡j hvq| H mg‡q evwn‡i cÖPzi †Mvjv¸wji AvIqvR †kvbv †h‡Z _v‡K| Avwg Avgvi cwiev‡ii m`m¨MY AwfeveK nxY nIqvq  `ywðš v—MÖ¯’ n‡q cwo| †gvevB‡j

evmvq Avwg Avgvi †g‡qi mv‡_ K_v ewj| mnKgx©‡`i mv‡_

†hvMv‡hv‡Mi †Póv Kwi| wKš‘ `ievi n‡j Avgvi mv‡_ Dcw¯Z’ wQ‡jb

Ggb KvD‡K †dv‡b cvB bvB| `ycyi AvbygvwbK 2.30 Uvi mgq3 Rb mk¯¿ BDR ˆmwbK H i“‡gi `iRv †f‡½ wfZ‡i Xy‡K| Avgvi w`‡K

A¯¿ ZvK K‡i GwM‡q Av‡m| wmcvnx AvjZvd, evkvi Ges nvq`viMY mvg‡b G‡j Avwg Zv‡`i ewj Avwg gwnjv Wv³vi| Avwg †Zvgv‡`i I †Zvgv‡`i ¯¿x mš—vb‡`i wPwKrmv Kwi| Avgv‡K †g‡ivbv| Zviv Avgvi nvZ ‡_‡K †gvevBj †dvbwU †K‡o †bq Ges †gRi †gvmvid‡K †Q U †Lv‡ci wfZi †_‡K ‡U‡b †nP‡o †ei K‡i MvwjMvjvR Ki‡Z _v‡K|

i“ ‡g _vKv my‡e`vi‡K mk¯¿ ˆmwbKiv eKvewK Ki‡Z _v‡K| Avv gK I †gRi †gvkvid‡K †U‡b †nP‡o i“g †_‡K eviv›`vq Av‡b| †gRi †gvkvid‡K eviv›`vq `vo Kwi‡q wcQ‡b wdi‡Z e‡j| wcQ‡b ‡divi

mv‡_ mv‡_ Zviv Zv‡K ¸wj  K‡i nZ¨v K‡i †gRi †gvkvid‡K eviv›`vq c‡o _vK‡Z †`wL| Avgv‡K we‡`ªvnxiv Zv‡`i mv‡_ _vKv wcKAvc Mvox‡Z DVv‡q †bq Ges WªvBfvi‡K Mvox‡Z K‡i †KvqvU©vi Mv‡W© †cŠ‡Q w`‡Z e‡j|

The aforesaid fact of Killing of Major Md.

Mosharaf Hossain, has been supported and

corroborated by PW 56 Major Md. Rezaul Karim

who has stated in his evidence as under:-

............25-2-09 Zvwi‡L mKvj 8.45 `ievi n‡j hvB| wWwR

mv‡ne `ievi ïi“ K‡ib| wZwb wewfbœ e¨vcv‡i K_vevZ©v e‡jb †hgb

WvjfvZ Kg©m~Px µxov BZ¨vw`| GK ch©v‡q wmcvnx gvBb gnvcwiPvjK‡K j¶¨ K‡i A¯¿ ZvK K‡i| ZLb ˆn ˆP ïi“ nq| GK

ch©v‡q `ievi n‡ji gv‡V P‡j Avwm| gv‡V fire Gi kã ïbv hvw”Qj|

gvV †_‡K ivB‡dj cvewjK ¯‹z‡ji wfZi cÖ‡ek Kwi| Aa¨‡¶i “‡gi

mvg‡b wM‡q `iRvq av°v w`‡j Aa¨¶ kvnvbv cviwfb `iRv Ly‡j †`b|

Avwg wfZ‡i Avkªq MÖnb Kwi| wfZ‡i Aa¨¶ Dcva¨¶ wQ‡jb| Rvbvjv

w`‡q evB‡i cwiw¯ w’ Z †`Lvi †Póv Kwi| mk¯¿ wewWAvi ˆmwbK‡`i mv‡_

wmcvnx AvjZvd evmvi, nvq`vi ‡K †`L‡Z cvB| wKQz mgq c‡i K¬vk

i“‡gi w`‡K ¸wji I AvZ©PxrKvi ïb‡Z cvB| c‡i †gRi Gwbi

Kv‡Q ïb‡Z cvB Zvi Dcw¯ w’ Z‡Z †gRi †gvkvid‡K wmcvnx AvjZvd,

nvq`vi, evmvi ¸wj K‡i nZ¨v K‡i‡Q| mܨvi c‡i Aa¨¶ I wbg©vb

kvLvi Kg©Pvix evB‡i P‡j †M‡j AvwgI Dcvav¶¨ wfZ‡i ev_ i“‡g

Ae¯’vb Kwi|

The aforesaid fact of killing has been corroborated and supported by the confessional

statement of No. 74853 Sepoy Md. Haider Ali CS

accused No.91; the relevant portion of his confessional

statement runs as follows:-

........... weMZ 25/02/07 Bs‡iRx nvwej`vi Kvgvj Avgv‡`i

mKvj mvZUvq mvP© Kwi‡q `ievi n‡j wb‡q hvq| Avwg wcQ‡bi w`‡K †d¬v‡i ewm| mKvj 9.00 Uvi mgq `ievi ïi“ nq| mKvj 9.30 Uvi

mgq GK ˆmwbK `iev‡i Xy‡K wW.wR. mv‡n‡ei w`‡K A¯¿ ZvK K‡i| ˆn ‰P ïi“ n‡j Ab¨vb¨‡`i mv‡_ AvwgI `ievi nj †_‡K †ewi‡q hvB|...........Zvici Avwg †Kv‡Zi w`‡K wM‡q GKwU ivB‡dj Ges 50

ivDÛ ¸wj wbB|.........†ejv Abygvb †cŠ‡b wZbUvi mgq AvjZvd I

evkvi Avgv‡K WvK †`q| Avwg Zv‡`i mv‡_ †h‡Z A¯^xKvi Ki‡j Zviv

agK †`q ZLb Avwg Zv‡`i mv‡_ hvB| Zv‡`i mv‡_ Abygvb 3.00 Uvi

w`‡K byi †gvnv¤§` cvewjK ¯‹y‡j hvB| HLv‡b GKwU K‡¶ †gRi †gvkviid I †gRi G¨vwb‡K †`wL| †gRi G¨vwb e‡jb †h, Avgv‡K †g‡ivbv Avwg Wv³vi| wmcvnx evkvi †gRi G¨vwb‡K i“g †_‡K †ei

K‡i †bq| Zvici AvjZvd †gRi †gvkviid‡K ¸wj K‡i †`q| ‡gRi †gvkviid c‡o hvq| evkviI GK ivDÛ ¸wj K‡i| †gRi †gvkviid gviv hvq| jvk †d‡j Avgiv HLvb †_‡K Avgiv P‡j Avwm| Place No-7: North-west corner of Soldiers Mess of 24 Rifle Battalion. 

It appears from the evidence of the prosecution witnessed and confessional statements of some of the accused that on 25.02.2009 at around 12:00 noon, Lance Naik Mozammel, Sepoy Uttom Barua, Sepoy Shamim Al Mamun @ Jewel, Sepoy Harun, Sepoy Tarequl, Cook Mojibur and many other armed BDR rebels took Doctor Major Mamun at the north-west corner of the soldiers mess of 24 Rifle Battalion humiliating and beating him repeatedly in a wounded and bleeding condition. Thereafter, at the order of armed Naib Subedar Islam Uddin, Lance Naik

Mozammel and other BDR rebels killed Doctor Major

Mamun by opening fires on him.       

With regard to the aforesaid fact of killing, an eye

witness PW 19 Md. Keramat Ali Sheikh has stated

in his evidence as under:-

..........25/02/09 Zvwi‡L Avwg wWwR Gi `iev‡i Dcw¯Z ’ wQjvg| Abygvb 9 Uvq `ievi ïi“ n q| ïi “i 20/25 wgwbU c‡i

wWwR Gi e³e¨ PjvKv‡j 13 e¨vUvwjq‡b gvBb mk¯¿ Ae¯ v’ q `ievi

n‡j cÖ‡ek K‡i I Stage G D‡V wWwR eivei A¯¿ ZvK K‡i| 44 e¨vUvwjq‡bi KvRj A¯¿ nv‡Z `ievi n‡j cÖ‡ek K‡i| Ab¨vb¨ AwdmviMY wmcvnx gBb‡K wbi¯¿ K‡i| wmcvnx KvRj `ievi nj †_‡K †ei n‡q hvq| Rv‡Mv e‡j wPrKvi K‡i, A‡bK wewWAvi m`m¨ `vwo‡q hvq| wewWAvi m`m¨iv `ievi nj Z¨vM Ki‡Z _v‡K| wWwR kvš— _vK‡Z e‡j I mevi K_v ïb‡e Rvbvq| AvwgI GK ch v©‡q `ievi nj Z¨vM Kwiqv 24 e¨vUvwjq‡bi w`‡K iIqvbv w`‡q †`L‡Z

cvB A‡bK mk¯¿ wewWAvi m`m¨ `ievi n‡j j¶¨ K‡i ¸wj Ki‡Q|

Avwg Avgvi wbR BDwbU 24 e¨vUvwjq‡b P‡j Avwm Ges 21 bs ˆmwbK

jvB‡b Z…Zxq Zjvq Ae¯ v’ b Kwi| jvB‡bi wcQ‡b Ae¯ v’ bKj v  ‡Abygvb 12Uvi w`‡K †`L‡Z cvB 24 e¨vUvwjq‡bi j¨vÝ bv‡qK †gvRv‡¤§j, wmcvnx DËg eo~qv, wmcvnx Ry‡qj, wmcvnx nv“ ib, wmcvnx Zv‡iKzj,

cvPK gwRei mn A‡bK mk¯¿ we‡`ªvnx AcgvbRbK Ae¯ v’ q Wvt †gRi gvgyb mv‡ne‡K AvnZ I i³v³ Ae¯ v’ q gvi‡Z gvi‡Z ˆmwbK †g‡ i DËi-cwðg KY©v‡i wb‡q hvq| †mLv‡b mk¯¿ _vKv bv‡qK mye ‡`vi Bmjvg Dwχbi wb‡`©‡k j¨vÝ bv‡qK †gvRv‡¤§j mn mK‡j Wvt †gRi gvgyb‡K ¸wj K‡i nZ¨v K‡i Ges Avwg me †`wL| ZLb Avwg f‡q AvZswKZ n‡q c e– ©w`‡K AfqviY¨ evMv‡b P‡j hvB| 

With  regard  to  the  aforesaid  fact  of  killing,

another eye witness PW 23 Sepoy Rafiqul Islam has

stated in his evidence as under:-

..........MZ  25/2/09 Zvwi‡L  24 e¨vUvwjq‡b Store  †_‡K

Mjd MÖvD‡Û Mv‡bi Stage ˆZixi Rb¨ gvjvgvj weZib Kwi|

weZibKv‡j Abygvb 921 Uv †_‡K `ievi n‡ji w`‡K ¸wji kã ïwb|

GKB mg‡q jvB‡bi mvg‡b K‡qKRb mk¯¿ BDR m`m¨ PxrKvi K‡i

e‡j Army BDR †K Avµgb K‡i‡Q| †Zvgiv jvB‡b bv †_‡K `ievi n‡j hvI| Gi g‡a¨ jvB‡bi mvg‡b I cv‡k¦© BDR m`m¨‡`i †`Šov‡`Šwo PxrKvi I ¸jv¸wj n‡Z †`wL| ZLb Avwg Store G Xz‡K

`iRv K‡i wfZ‡i Ae¯ v’ b Kwi | wKQy¶Y ci fqven Ae¯v’ †`‡L Store G _vK‡Z bv †c‡i evB‡i evmvq hvIqvi Rb¨ †ei nB|

24 e¨vUvwjq‡bi 1/2 Rb ˆmwbK jvB‡bi gvSLv‡b Avm‡j †`wL 24 e¨vUvwjq‡bi j¨vÝ bv‡qK †gvRv‡¤§j, wmcvnx DËg eo~qv, wmcvnx kvgxg Avj gvgyb, wmcvnx ZvwiKzj mn A‡b‡K mk¯¿ Ae¯ v’ q †gRi Wvt gvgyb‡K AvnZ I i³v³ Ae¯ v’ q gvi‡Z gvi‡Z ˆmwbK †g‡Qi DËi cwðg Kb©v‡i wb‡q Av‡m| †mLv‡b mk¯¿ Ae¯ v’ q `vwo‡q _vKv bv‡qK my‡e`vi Bmjvg Dwχbi wb‡`©‡k j¨vt bv‡qK †gvR‡¤ v§jmn mK‡j †gRi gvgyb‡K ¸wj K‡i nZ¨v K‡i| GB fqven `„k¨ †`‡L Avwg f‡q ˆmwbK jvB‡bi mvg‡b w`‡q wcjLvbvi evwn‡i evmvq P‡j hvB I †mLv‡b Ae¯ v’ b Kwi| 

With regard to the aforesaid fact of killing, PW

17 Havildar Md. Motaleb has stated in his evidence

as under:-

..........MZ 25/02/09 Zvwi‡L bv‡qK c‡` 24 ivB‡dj e¨vUvwjq‡b Kg©iZ wQjvg| Hw`b mKv‡j Ab¨ ˆmwbK‡`i ms‡M `iev‡i

Ask MÖnb Kwi| Abygvb 9 Uvq wWwR `ievi ïi“ K‡i| `ievi

PjvKv‡j 9-30 wgt wWwR cvk nB‡Z wmcvnx gvBb A¯¿mn `ievi n‡j

cÖ‡ek K‡i I wWwR eivei A¯¿ ZvK K‡i| Zvi wcQ‡b 44 e¨vUvwjq‡bi KvRj A¯¿mn `ievi n‡j cÖ‡ek K‡i| `iev‡i Dcw¯ Z’ AwdmviMY wmcvnx gvBb‡K a‡i †d‡j I wbiA¯¿ K‡i| wmcvnx gvBb

bx‡P c‡o hvq| wmcvnx KvRj `w¶Y w`K w`‡q †ei n‡q hvq| ZLb wewWAvi-iv Rv‡Mv e‡j wPrKvi K‡i| wewWAviMY ZLb `vwo‡q hvq|

ZLb wWwR mevB‡K em‡Z e‡j I Zv‡`i K_v ïb‡Z Pvq| Gi g‡a¨

evB‡i ¸wji kã cvIqv hvq| ZLb mevB `ievi nj Z¨vM Kiv ïi “

K‡i| ZLb AwabvqKMY‡K BDwb‡U wM‡q wbqš¿Y MÖnb Ki‡Z e‡j| Avwg cwðg w`K w`‡q `ievi nj Z¨vM Kwi| evwn‡i cÖPÛ ¸wji kã

ïwb| Avwg 24 ivB‡dj e¨vUvwjq‡b iIqvbv nB| ZLb 44 e¨vUvwjq‡bi †mwjg †iRv j¨vÝ bv‡qK GKivgyj‡K †`wL ¸wj Ki‡Z

Ki‡Z `ievi n‡ji w`‡K hvB‡Z‡Q| c‡i Avwg wbR BDwb‡U G‡m 5g

Zjvq †d¬v‡i ï‡q _vwK ¸wji f‡q| Abygvb 1021 Uvq gvB‡K e‡j

e¨vivM †Q‡o w`‡q A¯¿ wb‡q we‡`ªv‡n †hvM w`b| hw` KvD‡K e¨viv‡K cvIqv hvq Zvn‡j ¸wj Kiv n‡e| ZLb Avwg bx‡P †b‡g Avwm| ZLb

KzwPs  gvigv‡K  †`wL|  wmcvnx  mwdKzj,  nvwej`vi  ev`kv,  wmcvnx wgbnvR I my‡e`vi BmnvK‡K †`wL mk¯¿ Ae¯ v’ q| c‡i Avwge v_i“‡g AvZ¥‡Mvcb Kwi|  c‡i wmcvnx DËg eo~qv, wmcvnx gvgyb, wmcvnx nvi“b, wmcvnx ZvwiKzj mn A‡b‡K i³v³ I AvnZ Ae¯ v’ q †gRi gvgyb‡K †U‡b †nuP‡o DËi w`‡K wb‡q hvB‡Z‡Q| wKQy¶Y c‡i ¸wji kã cvB| c‡i †gRi gvgy‡bi g„Z‡`n †`L‡Z cvB| 

At the time of killing of Doctor Major Mamun,

the BDR rebels were armed with deadly weapons and

Sepoy Shamim Al Mamun @ Jewel was present there

with arms, which are evident from the confessional

statement of No.68696 Sepoy Shamim Al Mamun @

Jewel CS accused No.50; the relevant portion of his

confessional statement runs as follows:-

...........25/2/09 Bs ZvwiL mKvj 8.00 Uvi c‡i Nyg †_‡K

D‡V K¨vw›U‡b bv¯Ív Kwi| `ievi n‡j Avgvi wWDwU wQj bv| bv¯ vÍ K‡i G‡m Kv‡jv †MwÄ I Kv‡jv c¨v›U cwo| RyZv civi mgq wmcvnx dwi` †`Š‡o G‡m e‡j `ievi n‡j hy× jvM‡Q Avcbviv ZvovZvwo †ei nb|

ZLb jvB‡b wQj nvwej`vi iwKe I nvwej`vi ZwiK| Avwg †Mvjv¸wj

I wPrKvi ïb‡Z cvB| Avwg 24 e¨v‡Uwjqv‡bi ˆmwbK e¨vivK bs 2 Gi

c~e© cv‡k _vKZvg| e¨viv‡K wZb Zjvq _vKZvg| 3/4 Rb jvj gy‡Lvkavix Avgv‡`i e¨viv‡K Xz‡K e‡j ÔÔ†Zviv GLv‡bK  wKi‡ZwQm| AvR‡K we,wW Avi ¯^vaxb| †KvZ †Lvjv Av‡Q| †mLv‡b wM‡q A¯¿ †b| Zv‡`i mevi nv‡Z A¯¿ wQj|.............Gici Avwg wmwo †_‡K †b‡g †Kv‡Zi w`‡K hvB| ZLb Abygvb mKvj 10.00/10.20 Uv n‡e| A‡b‡K A¯¿ wb‡q hvw”Qj| Zv‡`i wPb‡Z cvwi bvB| GKRb ˆmwbK meyR is‡qi gy‡Lvk cov, nv‡Z 2 Uv Gm,Gg, wR wb‡q †eiA v‡m †KvZ

†_‡K| †m Avgv‡K GKUv Gm.Gg.wR †`q| H Gm.Gg.wRi g¨vMvwR‡b ¸wj wQj bv| Gici Avwg †m±i jvB‡bi w`‡K †`Š‡o P‡j Avwm| †m±i Ges 24 e¨v‡Uwjqv‡bi gvSLv‡b 3Uv Ggywbkb e· †Lvjv cvB| †mLvb †_‡K Avwg GK gyV ¸wj †bB| Abygvb 20/22 ivDÛ ¸j w wQj|

Gici Avwg †`Š‡o †m±i gmwR‡`i iv¯Ív w`‡q †Rwm I d¨vwgwj †KvqvU©v‡ii mvg‡bi cvwbi U¨vw¼‡Z ewm| †mLv‡b g¨vMvwR‡b ¸wj †jvW Kwi Ges e‡m _vwK|

At the time of killing of Doctor Major Mamun,

the BDR rebels were armed with deadly weapons and

Sepoy Uttom Barua was present there with arms,

which are evident from the confessional statement of

No. 77737 Sepoy Uttom Barua CS accused No.400;

the relevant portion of his confessional statement runs

as follows:-

..........25/02/2009 a¡¢lM pL¡m Ae¤j¡e 6.00V¡l ¢c−L O j¤

®b−L E−W gmC−e ¢j−m clh¡l q−m k¡Cz clh¡l q−ml ®fR−el ¢cL q−a 10 m¡Ce p¡j−e h¢pz clh¡l öl¦ qu pL¡m Ae¤j¡e 9.00 V¡u z

¢X¢S i¡m i¡a fÉ¡−lX Efq¡l ®cu¡u ph¡C−L deÉh¡c S¡e¡e, pL¡m

Ae¤j¡e 9.30 V¡l pju clh¡l q−ml ¢fR−el ¢cL q−a qW¡v HL¢V

…¢ml në öe−a f¡Cz ph¡C aMe cy¡¢s−u k¡u Hhw clh¡l qm ®b−L h¡¢ql q−a b¡−Lz A¡¢j A¡j¡l ¢fR−e b¡L¡ clS¡ ¢c−u 5ew ®N−Vl f¡−n gÉ¡¢j¢m ®L¡u¡VÑ¡−l k¡CzaMe A¡j¡l p¡−b 24 l¡C−gm hÉ¡V¡¢mu¡e Hl ¢h ®L¡Çf¡e£l ¢pf¡q£ n¡q£e ¢Rmz ®L¡u¡VÑ¡−ul p¡j−e

S¤−X¡ ®M−m¡u¡l ¢pf¡q£ A¡ma¡g−L cy¡¢s−u b¡L−a −c¢M, A¡ma¡g h−m

HM¡e ®b−L e¡ ®N−m …¢m L−l ®c−hz IM¡e ®b−L aMe ®c±−s Q−m A¡¢pz pL¡m aMe 10V¡ h¡−Sz jp¢S−cl j¡C−L öe−a f¡C ®k, A¡fe¡l¡ AÙ», ®N¡m¡ h¡l¦c ®eez A¡¢j 24 l¡C−gm hÉ¡V¡¢mu¡e ®L¡−a

¢N−u HL¢V l¡C−gm ®eC Hhw hÉ¡V¡¢mu¡e ®j−p Q−m k¡Cz ®j−p ¢N−u ®j−pl f¡−n h−p b¡¢Lz aMe l¡C−gm A¡j¡l L¡−RC ¢Rmz

Place No-8: The road of the north side of the pond

which is situated at the east side of the Darbar

Hall.

It is visible from the evidence of a prosecution

witness and confessional statement of an accused that

on 25.02.2009, when an uproar, disturbance and

anarchy arose at the Darbar Hall while delivering

speeches by the DG BDR on Dal-Vhat Programme

and other issues, the BDR soldiers started leaving the

Darbar Hall. At that time, DG BDR asked all the BDR personnel to remain seated and he wanted to hear their problems. However, ignoring and violating the order of DG BDR, the BDR personnel went out of the Darbar Hall breaking open the glasses of the doors and the windows. During that moment, DG BDR directed all the commanders to control the troops going to their respective units. On getting order from DG BDR, Major Mohammed Mominul Islam Sarker, unit officer of 24 Rifle Battalion went out of the Darbar Hall and started for his own unit 24 Rifle Battalion. When he reached the road of the north side of the pond which is situated at the east side of the Darbar Hall, Sepoy Masum CS accused No.224, Lance Naik Ekram, Sepoy Polton Chakma, Sepoy Mukul and others being weaponed with arms came there running. At one stage Sepoy Masum CS accused No.224 opened burst-fires on him from 25/30 yards away. In a moment, Major Mohammed Mominul Islam Sarker succumbed to the bullet injuries instantly. 

The aforesaid fact of killing has been narrated by PW-

15 Sepoy Md. Fazlul Haque who has stated in his

evidence as follows:-

...........MZ 25/2/09 ZvwiL mKv‡j `iev‡i hvIqvi Rb¨ Avgv‡K wba©vib Ki‡j Avwg `iev‡i hvB| DG  g‡nv`q `ievi ïi“

K‡ib| `iev‡i GB ch©v‡q DG g‡nv`q WvjfvZ m¤ú‡K© wKQ~ e³e¨ †i‡LwQ‡jb ZLb n‡ji wcQ‡bi `iRv w`‡q 13 ivB‡dj e¨vUwjq‡bi wmcvnx gvBb mkª¯¿ Ae¯’vq Stage  G D‡V DG Gi w`‡K A¯¿ ZvK

K‡i Zvi wc‡Q 44 e¨vUwjq‡bi KvRj Avjx `ievi nj cÖ‡ek K‡ib|

ZLb DDG mn Ab¨ Awdmvi Mb wmcvnx gvBb‡K wbi¯¿ K‡ib| wmcvnx KvRj ‡`Šwo‡q †MU w`‡q †ei n‡q hvb| Dcw¯ Z’ GKRb Rv‡Mv

e‡j wPrKvi K‡i | DAD, JCO I ˆmb¨Mb ZLb `vwo‡q hvb| ZLb

DG mKj‡K e‡jb Avcbviv emyb Avwg Avcbv‡`i me K_v k–b‡ev|

ZLb `ievi n‡ji evB‡i ¸wji kã †kvbv hvq| DAD, JCO/NCO

I ˆmwbKiv `ievi n‡ji Rvbvjv `iRv †f‡½ †ei n‡q hvq| †hLv‡b

my‡hvM cvq|D G ZLb e‡jb AwabvqKMb Avcbviv cwiw¯ w’ Z wbqš¿b

Ki“b| mevB QzUvQzwU K‡i †ei n‡Z _v‡K Avwg †mLv‡b wKQz¶b A‡c¶v Kwi| cwiw¯ w’ Z Lvivc †`‡L AvwgI `ievi nj †_‡K ‡ei nB|

n‡ji cwðg cv‡k †dvqvivi wbKU GKwU Pickup  ‡`wL| Pickup

‡cQ‡b K‡qKRb ˆmwbK `ievi n‡ji w`‡K A¯¿ ZvK K‡i Av‡Q Zv‡`i

g‡a¨ ‡_‡K Avwg wmcvnx igRvb 15 e¨vUwjqb‡K wPb‡Z cvwi| Avwg

ZLb 24 e¨vUwjq‡b Avm‡Z _vwK| Avwg hLb evei MÖvD‡Ûi DËi

cwðg †Kv‡b myjZvb MÖvD‡Ûi gvSvgvwS Avwm Avgv‡K 24 e¨vUwjq‡bi wmcvnx gvmyg Zvi wcQ‡b j¨vÝ bvqK GKivgyj wmcvnx cjUb PvKgv, wmcvnx gyKzi Avjg‡K A¯¿ mn †`Šwo‡q Avm‡Z †`‡L Avwg f‡q `vovB| GKB mg‡q 24 e¨vUvwjq‡bi Unit Officer †gRi gwgbyj

miKvi‡K `ievi n‡ji cye©cv‡k¦© cyKz‡ii DËi cv‡k¦©i i¯ vv— w`‡q

Avm‡Z †`wL| wmcvnx gvmyg †gRi gwgb‡K ‡`Lv gvÎ 25/30 MR `yi

n‡Z †gRi gwgb‡K j¶¨ K‡i eªvk dvqvi K‡i| gyû‡Z©i g‡a¨ †gRi

gwgb‡K gvwU‡Z c‡o †h‡Z †`wL| Avwg 24 e¨vUvwjqb‡K †`Šwo‡q hvB Ges 4_© Zvjvq ˆmwbK jvB‡b D‡V hvB|

At the time of killing of Major Mohammed Mominul Islam Sarker, Sepoy Al Masum was present

there with SMG and ammunitions, which are evident

from the confessional statement of No. 68435 Sepoy

Al Masum CS accused No.224; the relevant portion

of his confessional statement runs as follows:-

........... MZ 25/2/09 Zvs 8.45 Uvi w`‡K `ievi n‡j hvB|

e‡m _vwK| DG m¨vi K_v ejwQ‡jb| 9.15 Uvi w`‡K `ievin‡ji g‡a¨ kã nq GKwU| Dnv ¸wji kã wKbv Rvwb bv| GKRb Av: kã K‡i| mevB `uvov‡q c‡o| mevB û‡ovûwo K‡i `ievi nj †_‡K ‡ei

nB| AvwgI `iRv w`‡q †ei nB|.........10.45 wg: G †Kv‡Z †h‡q †`wL †KvZ †Lvjv| eû †jvK A¯¿ wb‡”Q| AvwgI SMG A¯¿ I ¸wj wbB|...........mKv‡j ci w`b (26/2/09 Zvs) mKvj 6.30 Uvi w`‡K

†Kv‡Z G‡m c~e© w`‡bi A¯¿ wbB|

Place No-9: Room of the Commanding Officer (CO) at the 1st floor of Sadar Rifle Battalion.

It is palpable from the evidence of some prosecution witnesses and confessional statements of some accused that on 25.02.2009, BA-5558 Major Mostafa Asaduzzaman @ Asad, Ops Officer, 11 Rifle Battalion, Ramgarh, the then time attached with Pilkhana, BDR Headquarters was present at the Darbar Hall. Due to uncontrollable and haphazard situation at the Darbar Hall, Major Asad went out of the Darbar Hall and came near the garden in front of the office of Sadar Rifle Battalion. When Major Asad reached there, Havilder Tariqul addressed Major Asad as son of bitch and told the other BDR Rebels to catch hold of him. Then Sepoy Aminar Rahman and another BDR Rebel caught hold of Major Asad from both the sides. Opening belt from the waist, Havilder Tariqul

assaulted on the different parts of the body of Major Asad. Having thrashed, Major Asad shouted for help telling that he was being assaulted. At the time of beating, Major Asad cried out for help to save him and requested the BDR personnel to take him at the 1st floor. At that time PW 28 Sepoy Anwar Hossain who was present there took him to the office of Commanding Officer (CO) at the 1st floor of Sadar Rifle Battalion. After sometimes, DAD Touhid entered the office room of Commanding Officer (CO). Major Asad asked DAD Touhid as to what was being happened. In reply DAD Touhid told him, "do you not understand?’ After a while DAD Kadir appeared at the office room of the Commanding Officer (CO). Within a short time, both of them went out of the office room of Commanding Officer (CO). A few time later, a BDR rebel brought PW 454 Lieutenant Colonel Jahanara, a doctor of BDR hospital at the office room of the Commanding officer (CO) of sadar Rifle Battalion at gunpoint. During that time, Havilder Belayet, Naik Asad and Naib Subedar Noor Nabi opened fires aiming at the office room of Commanding Officer (CO) as a result of which the glasses of the windows were broken down. In consequence thereof, Major Asad and PW 454 Lieutenant Colonel Jahanara hid themselves at the bathroom of the office of the Commanding officer (CO) out of fear of life shutting down the door from the inside. At that time PW 28 Sepoy Anwar Hossain concealed himself under the table of the Commanding officer (CO). After 10 to 15 minutes, DAD Towhid along with Havilder belayet, Naik Asad, Sepoy Aminar and three other BDR rebels being armed with weapons entered the office room of the Commanding

finish him and then went away therefrom. Getting

order from DAD Touhid, Havildar Belayet, Naik Asad

and Sepoy Aminar killed Major Asad by opening fires

on him and then went away therefrom. Concealing

under the table of Commanding Officer (CO), PW 28

Sepoy Anwar Hossain witnessed the aforesaid fact of

killing. PW 28 Sepoy Anwar Hossain sustained bullet

injuries while he was there under the table of the Commanding Officer (CO).

As regards the aforesaid killing, PW 28 Md. Anowar

Hossain has given vivid description in his evidence in

the following manner:-

........25-2-09 17 e¨vUvwjq‡b cÖavb Kvh©vj‡q mKvj 8.30 wgt QzwUi cÖ‡qvR‡b ev`K Awd‡m Avwm| cv‡k¦©i i“‡g wWGwW †ZŠnx` emv wQ‡jb| c‡i wZwb ‡ei n‡q hvb| Avwg QzwUi Av‡`‡ki A‡c¶v _vwK| Abygvb 9.30 wgt `ievi nj GjvKvq ¸wji kã ïb‡Z cvB|

‡m mgq we‡`ªvnx ˆmwbKiv m`i Awd‡m Av‡m| Avwg †M‡Ui Kv‡Q

Avm‡j †`wL we‡`ªvnx ‰mwbKiv m`i Awdm AwZµg K‡i jvBb †KvqvUvi GjvKvq hvB‡Z‡Q| ZLb `ievi nj GjvKvq wKQz A¯¿avix ‰mwbK‡`i ¸wj Ki‡Z †`wL| nvwej`vi ZwiKzj mn Av‡iv 2/3 Rb ˆmwbK †K †gRi AvQv`‡K gvi‡Z †`wL| Abygvb 9-50 wgt wWGwW ‡ZŠnx` G‡m D‡ËwRZfv‡e Av‡`k †`q †Zvgiv mK‡j A¯¿ Av‡bv I †mbv Awdmvi‡`i LZg Ki| H mgq e¨vUvwjq‡bi mvg‡b gvi †L‡Z

_vKv †gRi AvQv` e‡jb Avgv‡K gvi‡Q Avgv‡K evPvI e‡j †m wmwoi

Kv‡Q c‡o hvb| Avwg `ª“Z Zvi Kv‡Q hvB wZwb e‡jb Avgv‡K vPvI

I †ØvZjv wb‡q Pj| Avwg Zv‡K a‡i †ØvZjvq wm/I mv‡n‡ei i“‡g

wb‡q hvB| 2/1 wgwb‡Ui g‡a¨ wWGwW ‡ZŠwn` wm/I mv‡n‡ei i“‡g Xy‡Kb| †gRi AvQv` wRÁvmv K‡ib wK n‡”Q Dˇi wWGwW †ZŠnx` e‡jb Acwb ey‡Sb bv ? ZLb wWGwW Kvw`i Av‡m I 2 Rb GK‡Î ‡ei

n‡q hvq| Abygvb 4/5 wgwb‡Ui g‡a¨ †jt Kt Rvnvbviv D³ Awabvq‡Ki Awd‡m Av‡mb| ‡gWvg nvdv‡”Qb| 2/1 wgwb‡Ui g‡a¨ bv‡qK my‡e`vi byi“bœex †ei †_‡K ¸wj †g‡i P‡j hvq| ¸j w Rvbvjvi

KvP †f‡½ covq †gRi AvQv` I †jt K t Rvnvbviv‡K Awabvq‡Ki

i“‡g Xy‡K wQUKvbx jvwM‡q AvZ¥‡Mvcb K‡ib| Avwg Awabq v‡Ki

†Uwe‡ji bxP jywK‡q _vwK| Abygvb 10/15 wgt c‡i wWGwW †ZŠwn` I m½x nvwej`vi †ejv‡qZ bv‡qK AvQv` wmcvnx Avwgbvi ingvb km¯¿ Ae¯ v’ q Av‡iv 3 Rb ˆmwbK mn Awabvq‡Ki i“‡g Av‡mb| †gRi AvQv`‡K bv †c‡q ev_i“‡gi `iRv fv½vi Av‡`k w`‡q wWGwW †ZŠnx` P‡j hvb| (Av`vj‡Zi wRÁvmv)| ZLb Zviv ev_i“‡gi `iRv

†f‡½ †d‡j †gRi AvQv` I †jt Kt Rvnvbviv‡K †ei K‡i| Avmv`

m¨vi †Pqv‡i e‡m c‡ob| A¯¿avix ˆmwbKiv †jt Kt Rvnvbviv‡K i“g

†_‡K †ei K‡i wb‡q hvq| nvwej`vi †ejv‡qZ bv‡qK AvQv` wmcvnx Avwgbvi i“‡g †_‡K hvq| GKUz c‡i wWGwW †ZŠnx` wm/I Gi i“‡g Av‡m †gRi AvQv`‡K †`‡L Zv‡`i finish e‡j i“g †_‡K P‡j hvb|

m‡½ m‡½ nvwej`vi †ejv‡qZ bv‡qK AvQv` wmcvnx Avwgbvi †gRi AvQv`‡K ¸wj K‡i nZ¨v K‡i P‡j hvq| Avwg Awabvq‡Ki †Uwe‡j jywK‡q _vKve¯ v’ ¸wj we× nB| Avgvi gvRvq I cv‡q ¸wj jv‡M| Avwg Awabvq‡Ki †Uwej †_‡K †ei n‡q wmwoi Kv‡Q G‡m AÁvb n‡q hvB|

The evidence of P.W 28 Md. Anowar Hossain

has been supported and corroborated by P.W 16 Md.

Ashifur Rahman Akash who has stated in his

evidence as under:-

Avwg MZ 25/02/09 Zvwi‡L Avwg †UBjvwis k‡c Kv‡R wb‡qvwRZ wQjvg|.........Abygvb 9-25 †_‡K 9-30 wgt `ievi n‡ji

w`K †_‡K 2/1 ivDÛ ¸wji kã ïwb `ievi nj †_‡K| ZLb Avwg

†`vKvb †_‡K †ei n‡q cwðg cv‡k¦© eviv›`v †`L‡Z cvB wewWAvi Gi †jvKRb `ievi n‡ji w`K †_‡K †ei n‡q PZzw`©‡K QyUvQywU Ki‡Q| Hmgq m`i e¨vUvwjq‡b cye© `w¶Y †Kv‡Y M¨v‡i‡Ri mvg‡b nvwej`vi ZwiKzj, wmcvnx Avwgbyi ingvb `vwo‡q wQ‡jb| Hmgq `ievi nj †_‡K Avmv †gRi AvQv` m`i e¨vUvwjq‡bi Awd‡mi mvg‡b evMv‡bi Kv‡Q Avm‡j nvwej`vi †gRi ZwiKzj e‡j H GK KzËvi ev”Pv Av‡m

ai| wmcvnx Avwgbyi ingvb I AviI GKRb AcwiwPZ ˆmwbK †gRi AvQv‡`i `yB cv‡k 2Rb a‡i iv‡L| nvwej`vi ZwiKzj Zvi †Kvg‡ii

†eë Ly‡j †gRi AvQv‡`i bv‡K gy‡L ey‡K wc‡V gvi‡ZK _| v ‡†gRi AvQv` Zv‡K av°v †g‡i m`i e¨vUvwjq‡bi 2q Zjvq wm/I m‡n‡ei Awd‡m Xz‡K| wmcvnx Avwgbyi wcQy wcQy hvq| Hmgq nvwej`i v ZwiKzj jvB‡bi bx‡P †h‡Z _v‡K I wPrKvi K‡i ej‡Z _v‡K †Kvb wewWAvi

Gi †jvK Lvwj nv‡Z _v‡K‡e bv mevB A¯¿ wb‡q `ievi n‡j hv‡e I Avwg© Awdmvi †`LvgvÎ ¸wj Ki‡e g‡g© wb‡`©k †`q| Gi wKQy¶Y c‡i nvmcvZv‡ji †jt K‡Y©j Rvnvbviv g¨vWvg‡K GKRb ˆmwbK A¯¿ ZvK K‡i m`i e¨vUvwjq‡b 2q Zjv wm/I mv‡n‡ei Awd‡m wb‡q hvq| Hmgq nvwej`vi †ejv‡q‡Zi nv‡Z GmGgwR, bv‡qK AvQv‡`i nv‡Z ivB‡dj wb‡Z †`wL| Zviv wm/I mv‡n‡ei Awdm j¶¨ K‡i ¸wj K‡i|

nvwej`vi †ejv‡qZ e‡j †gRi AvQv‡`i ev”Pv‡K †ei Ki| KzËvi ev”Pv‡K gvi kvjv †hb †Kvbfv‡e evP‡Z bv cv‡i| Z_v bvqK AvQv`‡K nvwej`vi †ejv‡qZ e‡j Pj kvjv‡K gvi‡ev GB e‡j Zviv

m`i e¨vUvwjq‡b Xz‡K| wKQy¶Y c‡i 4/5 Rb ˆmwbK †jt K‡Y©j Rvnvbviv‡K gvi‡avi Ki‡Z Ki‡Z bx‡P bvwg‡q iv¯—vq Avb‡j GKwU G¨v¤^y‡j‡Ý DwV‡q †`q| c‡i nvwej`vi †ejv‡qZ, bv‡qK AvQv`, wmcvnx Avwgbyi ingvb A¯¿ wb‡q wm/I mv‡n‡ei Awd‡m XzK‡j cÖPÛ ¸wji kã ïb‡Z cvB| Avwg ZLb Avgvi Kg©Pvix‡`i wb‡q †UBjvwis

k‡ci †PŠwKi bx‡P Ae¯ v’ b Kwi|

The evidence of P.W 28 Md. Anowar Hossain

has been partly supported and corroborated by P.W

454 Lieutenant Colonel Jahan Ara Begum who has

stated in his evidence as under:-

.........25/2/09 Zvwi‡L mKvj 8.30 Uvq `ievi n‡j hvB| 9

Uvq `ievi ïi“ nq| Zvi e³‡e¨i GK ch©v‡q 9 1/2 Uvq GKRb

we‡`ªvnx ‰mwbK wWwR‡K A¯¿ ZvK K‡i ZLb ‰n ‰P ïi“ nq| A‡b‡KB †`Šov‡`Šwo K‡i| Avwg f‡q `ievi nj Z¨vM Kwi| gv‡Vi g‡a¨ w`‡q

†h‡Z _vwK ¸wji k‡ã fq †c‡q ï‡q cwo| GKRb ‰mwbK Avgv‡K

A¯¿ ZvK K‡i †Rvi cye©K m`i e¨vUvwjq‡bi †`vZvjvq AvUwK‡q iv‡L|

H K‡¶ †gRi AvQv`‡K †`L‡Z cvB| Zvi Mv‡q Uniform wQj bv|

GKwU ¸wj G‡m Rvbvjvi Kv‡P jv‡M| Avwg I †gRi AvQv` f‡q

ev_l¦‡g Xy‡K wQUwKwb jvwM‡q e‡m _vwK| Abygvb 10 Uvq GKRb we‡`ªvnx ‰mwbK G‡m ev_l¦‡g `iRv †f‡½ Avgv‡`i †U‡b wnQ‡o †ei

K‡i †gRi AvQv`‡K gviwcU Ki‡Z _v‡K| †gRi AvQv` †Pqv‡i e‡m

c‡ob| †gRi AvQv`‡K i“‡gi wfZ‡i Kb©v‡i wb‡q hvq I Avgv‡K

†ei K‡i Av‡b| K‡qKRb ‰mwbK Avgv‡K wb‡P bvwg‡q Av‡b| Zviv Avgv‡K Avi.wc †`i i“‡g wb‡q hvq| ....... iv‡Z Rvb‡Z cvwi

we‡`ªvnxiv A‡bK †mbv Awdmvi‡K nZ¨v K‡i‡Q| Mfxi iv‡Z

nvmcvZv‡j Mvoxi I jvk †djvi kã cvB| Av›`vR Kwi giPyqvix‡Z jvk ivLv n‡”Q|

Place No-10: In front of the teachers quarters.

On 25.02.2009 at around 9:30 am while DG BDR was speaking about Dal-Vat program, a tumultuous, stormy and convulsive situation was arisen at the Darbar Hall. At one stage, DG BDR directed all the Commanders to control the troops of their respective units. Following the order of DG BDR, many officers went out of the Darbar Hall to comply with the order

of DG BDR. The DG and many officers remained in

the Darbar Hall. Looting the arms and ammunitions from the Kote and Magazine, the BDR rebels taking arms and ammunitions started opening fires violently aiming at the Darbar Hall. The armed BDR rebels encircled the Darbar Hall and at one stage entered the Darbar Hall opening intermittent firings. The BDR rebels brought out DG and other officers from the Darbar Hall in several groups at gunpoint and eventually killed the DG and other officers by opening burst-fires and fires on them in and outside the darbar Hall in a barbarous and inhuman manner. Apart from aforesaid killing, many other officers were also killed by the BDR rebels in different places in and around the Darbar Hall. In view of the above situtation, the army officers who were in the outside of the Darbar Hall were looking for shelter. The BDR rebels by making announcement through mikes, megaphones and by shouting ordered the other BDR rebels to kill the army officers finding and bringing them from different places and hideouts. The BDR rebels then started killing the army officers in different places as soon as the officers were found and seen. On that day at around 12:15 pm, one army officer was being

The aforesaid fact of killing is evident from the confessional statement of No 75336 Sepoy Md. Saiful

Islam CS accused No 61 of 22 Rifle Battalion, the

then time attached with 44 Rifle Battalion; the relevant

portion of his confessional statements runs as

follows:-

..........25/2/09 Bs‡iRx †fv‡i D‡V bvgvR c‡o Avwg Avevi Nywg‡q hvB| mKvj 9.10/9.20 wgwb‡Ui mgq ¸wji kã ï‡b Nyg †fs‡M hvq| ........bx‡P  bvgvi ci 44  ivB‡dj e¨v‡Uwjq‡bi wmcvnx Rmxg Avgv‡K GKwU ivB‡dj †`q| H ivB‡dj wb‡q Avwg `ievi n‡ji cv‡k †RwmI †KvqvUv‡ii mvg‡b P‡j hvB| H Lv‡b wM‡q Avwg 44 e¨vUvwjq‡bi  wmcvnx Kvgvj‡K dvqvi Ki‡Z †`wL| †m `ievi n‡ji w`‡K dvqvi KiwQj| Avgvi ivB‡d‡j ¸wj bv _vKvq Kvgvj‡K wRÁvmv Kwi †h, ¸wj †Kv_vq cve ? Kvgvj GKwUwi·v †`wL‡q wi·v †_‡K ¸wj wb‡Z e‡j| Avwg wi·v †_‡K 20 ivDÛ ¸wj

wbB| Avwg  `ievi n‡ji w`‡K  10(`k)  ivDÛ  duvKv ¸wj Kwi|.........Abygvb 11.00 Uvi w`‡K Avwg `ievi nj †_‡K †ei

n‡q wk¶K‡`i †KvqvU©v‡ii mvg‡b hvB| †Kvb Awdmvi jywK‡q

Av‡Q wKbv †`Lvi Rb¨ Aa¨‡¶i evmvq XywK| Avwg evmvq †XvKvi ci

GKwU i“‡g wZbwU ev”Pv‡K Lv‡Ui bx‡P jywK‡q _vK‡Z †`wL| Zv‡`i‡K wR‡Ám Ki‡j evev Ð gv evwn‡i Av‡Q e‡j Rvbvq| Avwg

i“‡g _vKve¯nvq 44 e¨vUvwjq‡bi wmcvnx Rmxg Ges gqgbwmsn

wmcvnx  Rmxg i“‡g  Xy‡K| gqgbwmsn †m±‡ii  Rmx‡gi n‡Z v Gj,Gg,wR,  Ges kix‡i  ¸wji wdZv  wQj| 44 e¨vUvwjq‡bi

Rmx‡gi nv‡Z ivB‡dj wQj| Avgiv wZb Rb wW‡dÝ †bqvi Rb¨

†`vZjvi Qv‡` DwV | Abygvb 12.15 Uvi mgq Qv` †_‡K ‡`wL

wZbRb wewWAvi wmcvnx GKRb Avwg© Awdmvi‡K †U‡b wb‡q hv‡”Q| gqgbwmsn †m±‡ii Rmxg bx‡P †b‡g H wZbRb wmcvnx‡K Avwg© Awdmvi‡K ¸wj Ki‡Z e‡j, Zviv ¸wj Ki‡Z ivRx bv nIqvq Rmxg

wb‡RB Gj, Gg, wR, w`‡q eªvk dvqvi K‡i H AwdmviwU‡K nZ¨v

K‡i | Zvici †m Avevi Qv‡` P‡j Av‡m| `ycyi †ejvq Avgiv H

evmv‡ZB LvIqv `vIqv Kwi|

Place No-11: At the water pump house situated at the north side of the Darbar Hall crossing the nearby field.

It appears from the evidence of a witness and confessional statements of accused that following the occurrence at the Darbar Hall happened on 25.02.2009 in the morning, the BDR rebels after killing DG BDR and other army officers in and around the Darbar Hall started looking for the other army officers in different places and hideouts of the Pilkahana. The hundreds of BDR rebels taking arms and ammunition opened fires in different direction creating alarming, dreadful, frightening and horrifying situation in the Pilkhana and started looking for the army officers at the residences and different places of pilkhana for killing them. Being perplexed and stunned at the sudden occurrence at the Pilkhana, the army officers in the face of critical and dangerous situation and in order to save their lives from the clutches of death took shelter in different places of Pilkhana. At that juncture, three army officers in a bid to save their lives took shelter at the water pump house situated at the north side of the Darbar Hall crossing the nearby field and concealed themselves therein. PW 36 Cook Md. Amanuddin of 13 Rifle Battalion, the then time attached with Records Wing also took shelter at the water pump house with the aforesaid three army officers. After a while, No 51148 Lance Naik Hamidul of 44 Rifle Battalion, No 77867 Sepoy Anisur of 44 Rifle Battalion, No 58589 Sepoy Baki Billah of 13 Rifle Battalion and 5/6 armed BDR rebels entered the water pump house and brought them out therefrom at gunpoint. PW 36 Cook Md. Amanuddin of 13 Rifle Battalion, the then time attached with Records Wing

The aforesaid fact of killing has been described by  PW 36 Cook Md. Amanuddin  of 13 Rifle Battalion, the then time attached with Records Wing, who has stated in his evidence among others as under:-

.........†jt K‡Y©j Lwei mv‡n‡ei evmvq cvPK wnmv‡e Kg©iZ wQjvg| 25-2-09 Zvwi‡L mKvj 7 Uvq Lwei mv‡n‡ei evmvq wM‡q bv¯—v ˆZix Kwi| Abygvb 9-25 wgt `ievi n‡ji w`‡K ¸wji kã

ïb‡Z cvB †jt Kt Lwei mv‡ne wcjLvbvi evB‡i wQ‡jb| GK ch©v‡q

¸wji kã †e‡o †M‡j Avgiv evmvi `iRv eÜ K‡i †`B| mKvj 10-

45 wgt mv‡n‡ei ¯¿x wcjLvbvi Ae¯ v’ Rvbvi Rb¨ wfZ‡i Lywo‡q †`L‡Z e‡jb| Avwg Zvi K_vgZ evmv †_‡K †ei n‡q cwðg w`‡K Avm‡Z _vwK| ivBcKvm Gi `w¶b cwð‡g cvwbi cv‡¤úi Kv‡Q Avm‡j `ievi n‡ji w`K †_‡K ¸wj Avm‡Z †`wL| Avwg cvwbi cv‡¤ú

Xy‡K cwo| †mLvb †_‡K †`wL 3 Rb †mbv Awdmvi jywK‡q A‡Q v| 3/4 wgwbU ci 44 e¨vUvwjq‡bi 51148 j¨vÝ bv‡qK nvwg`yj 4 4 e¨vUvwjq‡bi 77867 wmcvnx AvwbQzi 13 e¨vUvwjq‡bi 58589 wmcvnx evKx wej−vn mn AviI 5/6 Rb mk¯¿ we‡`ªvnx wewWAvi m`m¨ cvwbi cv‡¤ú Av‡m| Zvnviv Avgv‡`i cvwbi cv¤ú †_‡K †ei K‡i A¯¿

ZvK K‡i ¸wj K‡i gvivi Rb¨| Avwg cvPK ejvq GKRb av°v w`‡q

e‡j wK Kwim| Gi g‡a¨ j¨vÝ bv‡qK nvwg`yj wmcvnx AvwbQzi ingvb,

wmcvnx evKx wej−vn 3 Rb Awdmvi‡K ¸wj Ki‡j Zviv gvwU‡Z c‡o hvq| Avwg f‡q †`Šwo‡q Awdmv‡ii evmvq P‡j Avwm|

The aforesaid fact of killing has also been disclosed in the cofessional statement of  Sepoy Shahadat Hossain CS accused No 191 who has

stated in his confessional statement as under:-

...........25/02/09 a¡¢lM ®i¡l Ae¤j¡e f¡yQV¡l pju O¤ ®b−L E¢Wz gS−ll e¡j¡S f−s Ae¤j¡e p¡aV¡l pju q¡pf¡a¡m NË¡E−ä gm

Ce qCz ........Ae¤j¡e ¢hL¡m Q¡lV¡l pju H¢V¢V ®L¡pÑ Ll−a Bp¡ q¡¢hmc¡l h¡p¡l Bj¡−cl l¦−j H−p 7/8 Se−L fÊÉ¡¢ƒp ¢X¢ EV Ll¡l

SeÉ °al£ q−a h−mz …¢ml n−ë Bjl¡ ®LE e¡ EW−m ®p h−m ®k, e¡−uh p¤−hc¡l ®a¡l¡h Bm£, ®g¡pÑ ®S¢pJ Bj¡−cl ®k−a h−m−Rz aMe

Bjl¡ H¢cL ®p¢cL ®R¡V¡ R¤¢V L−l f¡m¡−e¡l ®Qø¡ L¢lz B¢j Vu−m−V O¤j¡−e¡l ®Qø¡ Ll−m ®p h−m f¡¢m−u h¡yQ−a f¡lh¡e¡z ®p Bj¡−L pq ¢pf¡q£ 80251 n¡qS¡m¡m, ¢pf¡q£ 79975 ®lS¡Em Cpm¡j, ¢pf¡q£ ®p¡−qm l¡e¡, ¢pf¡q£ 80533 ®j¡x l¢hEm Cpm¡j,¢pf¡q£ l¡¢Sh 80025 °b As j¡jÑ¡−cl−L e£−Q e¡j¡u J gm Ce Ll¡uz Bj¡−cl−L 36 l¡C−gm hÉ¡V¡¢mu¡−el NË¡Eä ¢c−u clh¡l q−m ¢e−u k¡uz aMe e¡−uL ®j¡š²¡l J q¡¢hmc¡l h¡n¡l H−p ®k¡N −cuz ®pM¡−e Ae j¤ ¡e

20/30 Se AÙ»d¡l£ ®f¡o¡L f¢l¢qa ¢h¢XBl pcpÉ−cl ®cM−a f¡Cz L−uLSe ¢h¢XBl pcpÉ−L fa¡L¡ ¢c−u j¤M h¡d¡ AhÙÛ¡u ®c¢Mz ®pM¡−e Ef¢ÙÛa Bj¡l ®L¡−pÑl ®VÊ¢ew ®S¢pJ e¡−uh p¤−h¡ cl ®a¡l¡h Bm£ e¡−uL ®j¡š²¡l ¢h¢XBl q¡pf¡a¡−ml ®m¡L−cl ®c¢Mz ch¡l q−ml ¢ial ®gÓ¡−l Q¡l¢V m¡n ®c¢Mz a¡l¡ ¢h¢XBl Hl ®f¡o¡L fs¡ ¢Rmz e¡−uh p¤−hc¡l ®a¡l¡h Bm£ pq AeÉ¡eÉ AÙ»d¡l£l¡ A−Ù»l j −¤ M iu ®c¢M−u m¡n …¢m N¡s£−a a¥m−a h−mz ¢h¢XBl Hl HL¢V hs VÊ¡L clh¡l q−ml p¡j−e c¡s¡−e¡ ¢Rmz Bj¡l¡ m¡n a¥m−a e¡ Q¡C−m a¡l¡

Bj¡−cl−L …¢m Ll−a EÜa quz Bjl¡ pL−m ¢j−m m¡n …¢m VÊ¡−L E¢W−u ¢cCz flha£Ñ−a e¡−uh p¤−hc¡l ®a¡l¡h Bm£, q¡¢hcmc¡l h¡p¡l,

e¡−uL ®j¡š²¡l J AÙ»d¡l£ 8/10 Se ¢j−m Bj¡−cl−L clh¡l q−ml

¢LR¤ f¤L¥l f¡−s ¢e−u k¡uz ®pM¡−e L¡−m¡ ®f¡o¡L fs¡ HLS−el m¡n ®cM−a f¡Cz a¡−cl ¢e−cÑ−n Bjl¡ Eš² m¡n¢V I VÊ¡−L E¢W−u ¢cCz a¡lfl a¡l¡ Bj¡−cl−L clh¡l qm q−a Ešl ¢c−Ll j¡W f¡l q−u

f¡¢e f¡−Çfl ¢eLV ¢e−u k¡uz ®pM¡−e f¡−Çfl O−ll ¢ial ®gÓ¡−

¢h¢XBl Hl ®f¡o¡L fs¡ …¢m¢hÜ lš²j¡M¡ AhÙÛ¡u ¢aeS−el m¡n

®cM−a f¡Cz a¡−cl ¢e−cÑ−n ®pM¡−e l¡Ù¹¡l Ef−l c¡s¡−e¡ HL¢V ¢fL

Bf iÉ¡−e Eš² m¡n ¢ae¢V ph¡C ¢j−m E¢W−u ¢cCz

The aforesaid fact of killing has also been

disclosed in the cofessional statement of  JCO/4887

Naib Subedar Medical Assistant Torab Ali CS

accused No 181 who has stated in his confessional

statement as under:-

............A¡j¡−L d−l ¢e−u Pickup N¡¢s−a hp¡−m¡z N¡¢sl

p¡−b q¡¢hmc¡l ýj¡u§e ¢Rmz ®p aMe h−m A¡−l¡ ®m¡L m¡N−hz A¡m¡E¢Ÿe aMe A¡h¡l e¡−uL p¤−hc¡l j−e¡”e−L d−l ¢e−u A¡−pz

A¡j¡−cl−L ¢e−u 5ew ®NV J clh¡l q−ml j¡−Tl S¡uN¡u e¡¢j−u ¢c−u

h−m f−s b¡L¡ m¡n…−m¡ N¡¢s−a XW¡−az JM¡−e 3Ve£ VÊ¡L ®cM−a f¡Cz JM¡−e aMe e¡−uL p¤−hc¡l ®j¢XLÉ¡m pqL¡l£ J¢mEl lqj¡e

A¡−pz ®p H−p A¡m¡E¢Ÿe J ýj¡u§e−L h−m HC h¤−s¡−cl−L ®Le H−e−R, Hl¡ ¢L m¡n EW¡−a f¡l−hz q¡¢hmc¡l ýj¡u¤e aMe AÙ»d¡l£

¢LR¤ °p¢eL−L ®X−L A¡em Hhw a¡−cl−L m¡n EW¡−a hmmz

A¡m¡E¢Ÿe A¡j¡−L 5ew ®N−V ¢e−u k¡u ®V¢m−g¡e Ll¡−e¡l SeÉz A¡¢j MI l¦−j ®V¢m−g¡e Ll−m q¡¢hmc¡l q¡−nj p−l¡u¡l ®V¢m−g¡e dl−m A¡¢j a¡−L m¡n EW¡−e¡l SeÉ ®m¡L f¡W¡−a h¢mz aMe ®hm¡ 2V¡ h¡−Sz ¢g−l H−p −c¢M VÊ¡−L 3V¡ m¡n JW¡−e¡ q−u−Rz q−ml p¡j−e DG J DDG j−q¡cu Hl m¡n f−s b¡L−a ®c¢Mz I c¤CV¡ m¡nJ a¡l¡ JW¡uz A¡¢j A¡h¡l ®V¢m−g¡e L¢lz 3.00V¡l pju q¡pf¡a¡m ®b−L q¡¢hmc¡l A¡h¤m h¡n¡l 2Se °p¢eL pq A¡−pz clh¡l q−ml j−dÉJ

A−eL m¡n ¢Rmz A¡¢j A¡h¡l ®g¡e Ll−m e¡−uL ®j¡š²¡l ®g¡e d−lz a¡−L A¡¢j A¡−l¡ ®m¡L f¡W¡−L h¢mz ®j¡š²¡l 4V¡l ¢c−L e¡−uL A¡p¡cpq 4/5 Se °p¢eL ¢e−u A¡−pz HC ph °p¢eL ¢c−u a¡l¡ VÊ¡−L

m¡n JW¡−m¡z fСu 37-¢V m¡n 2 VÊ¡−L JW¡−e¡ q−m¡z m¡n JW¡−e¡ ®no q−a fСu 5V¡ ®h−S k¡uz A¡j¡−cl−L ýj¡u¤e aMe Ešl f¡−nl f¡¢el VÉ¡w−Ll p¡−bl gy¡L¡ O−l ®k−a h−mz ®pM¡−e ¢N−u −c¢M 3V¡ m¡nz påÉ¡l ¢c−L q¡¢hmc¡l ýj¡u¤e Pickup N¡¢s ¢e−u A¡p−m A¡j¡l ®m¡LSe m¡n E¢W−u ®cuz

The aforesaid fact of killing has also been disclosed in the cofessional statement of No. 34227 Havildar Medical Assistant Md. Abul Bashar CS accused No 178 who has stated in his confessional statement as under:-

............25/02/2009 a¡¢lM c¤f¤l p¡−s ¢aeV¡l pju A¡¢j Hj A¡C l¦−j ¢Rm¡jz l¦−j ®V¢m−g¡e ®h−S EWm A¡¢j ¢l¢pi L¢lz Afl fС¿¹ ®b−L e¡−uL p¤−hc¡l ®j¢XLÉ¡m pqL¡l£ ®a¡l¡hA ¡m£ A¡j¡−L 10Se ¢h¢V¢V °p¢eL pq clh¡l q−m â¦a k¡Ju¡l SeÉ A¡−cn L−lez A¡¢j Hj A¡C l¦−j ®LE e¡C hm−m ¢a¢e A¡j¡−L −V¢m−g¡−e h−me l¡−Me A¡fe¡l Hj A¡C l¦j ®hn£ Q¡m¡¢L Ll−he¡ â¦a L¡S Llz

A¡¢j aMe q¡pf¡a¡m °p¢eL m¡C−e k¡C Hhw e¡−uL p¤−hc¡l ®a¡l¡h A¡m£l Lb¡ j−a¡ (1) ¢pf¡q£ l¡¢Sh ¢ju¡ (2 ) ¢pf¡q£ ®lS¡Em (3) ¢pf¡q£ ®j¡x n¡q¡c¡a (4) ¢pf¡q£ l¢hEm A¡mj (5) ¢pf¡q£ n¡qS¡m¡m (6) ¢pf¡q£ ¯b Aw j¡lj¡ (7) ¢pf¡q£ ®p¡−qm l¡e¡ pq 7 (p¡a) Se pqL¡−l A¡¢j ®f¡o¡L f¢l¢qa AhÙÛ¡u ¢hL¡m ®f±−e fy¡QV¡l ¢c−L clh¡l q−m k¡C Hhw e¡−uL p¤−hc¡l ®a¡l¡h A¡m£l ¢eLV ¢l−f¡VÑ L¢lz clh¡l q−ml ¢ial aMe ®cM−a f¡C ph ¢LR¤ i¡‰¡Q¤l¡ Hhw fÐQ¤l lš² HM¡−e −pM¡−e R¢s−u A¡−R,4/5¢V jªa−cq ®gÓ¡−l f−l b¡L−a ®c¢Mz

jªa ®cq…¢ml j−dÉ A¡j¡l Lj¡−ä¾V L−eÑm j¢nEl lqj¡−el j aª −cq

¢Rmz AeÉ¡eÉ A¢gp¡−ll jªa−cq ¢Qe−a f¡¢l e¡Cz e¡−uL p¤−hc¡l

®a¡l¡h A¡m£ A¡j¡−L m¡n…¢m VÊ¡−L a¥−m ¢c−a h−m Hhw HlC j−dÉ 1V¡ 3 V¢e VÊ¡L clh¡l q−ml p¡j−e Q−m A¡−p z ¢e−cÑn® j¡a¡−hL

A¡¢jJ A¡j¡l p¡−b b¡L¡ p¡aSe ¢pf¡q£ 4¢V A¡¢jÑ A¢gp¡−ll m¡n

VÊ¡−L a¥−m ®cCz clh¡l q−m b¡L¡ AeÉ¡eÉ AÙ»d¡l£ SJu¡el¡ A¡j¡−cl−L clh¡l q−ml ¢fR−el j¡S¡−ll f¤L¥−ll f¡−s ¢e−u k¡uz

®pM¡−e a¡h¤l p¡j−e lÉ¡−hl −f¡o¡L f¢l¢qa AhÙÛ¡u ®jSl lÉ¡w−Ll

A¢gp¡−ll jªa ®cq −cM−a f¡Cz ®pM¡−e ®j¢XLÉ¡m pqL¡l£ e¡−uL ®j¡š²¡l−L m¡−nl f¡−n ®cM−a f¡Cz Bjl¡ m¡n VÊ¡L a ¢¥ m Hhw m¡n…¢m ¢eu¡ VÊ¡L clh¡l q−ml f§hÑ¢c−L Q−m k¡uz f−l ¤− jM¡n Hhw ®qm−jV f¢l¢qa pnÙ» AhÙÛ¡u b¡L¡ 4Se ¢h¢XA¡l SJu¡e A¡j¡−cl−L

f¡¢el f¡−Çfl ¢eLV ¢e−u k¡uz f¡¢el f¡Çf clh¡l qm ®b−L 200 NS

Ešl ¢c−L q−hz A¡j¡−cl p¡−b ®j¢XLÉ¡m pqL¡l£ e¡−uL p¤−hc¡l

®a¡l¡h A¡m£J ¢Rmz ®pM¡−e p¤−hc¡l j−e¡l”e−L ®cM−a f¡C Hhw

A¡jl¡ kMe clh¡l qm ®b−L m¡n VÊ¡−L a¥−m ®cC aMeJ j−e¡l”e−L −pM¡−e cy¡s¡−e¡ AhÙÛ¡u ®cM−a f¡Cz Ae¤j¡e påÉ¡ 6V¡l ¢c−L f¡−Çfl ¢eLV ¢Nu¡ ®cM−a f¡C ®k, f¡−Çfl h¡C−l 2¢V Hhw f¡−Çfl ¢ia−l 2¢V ®j¡V-4¢V A¡¢jÑ A¢gp¡−ll m¡n f−s A¡−Rz HLV¤ f−lC p¤−hc¡l −j¢XLÉ¡m pqL¡l£ A¢m ¢h¢XA¡l q¡pf¡a¡−ml p¡c¡ lw−ul Hjð −¤ m¾p

¢e−u f¡¢el f¡−Çfl ¢eLV A¡−p Hhw ®p e¡−uL p¤−hc¡l ®a¡l¡h A¡m£l

p¡−b Lb¡ h−m Q−m k¡uz HLV¤ f−lC 1¢V M¡¢m ¢fLA¡f ¢e−u q¡¢hmc¡l ýj¡u e¥ f¡¢el f¡−Çfl ¢eLV A¡−pz q¡¢hmc¡l ýj¡u¥e l¡‰¡j¡¢V ®pƒl ®b−L ¢p¢p ¢e−u Ù»£−L ¢Q¢Lvp¡l SeÉ q¡pf¡a¡−m B−p

Hhw q¡pf¡a¡−m a¡l p¡−b A¡j¡l f¢lQu quzI ¢fLA¡f  N¡s£−a

A¡jl¡ 4¢V jªa−cq a¥−m ®cCz q¡¢hmc¡l ýj¡u¥e Hhw ¢fLA¡f Q¡mL m¡n…−m¡ ¢e−u pcl l¡C−gm hÉ¡V¡¢mu¡−el p¡j−e ¢c−u k¡uz

Place No-12: Shaheed Fazlul Haque English

Medium School area.

It appears from the confessional statement of an

accused that on 25.02.2009, when the Darbar of DG

BDR at the Darbar Hall was going on, the BDR

soldiers following the criminal conspiracy, after

looting the arms and ammunitions breaking open the

Kote and Magazine, carried out attack on the unarmed

and innocent army officers at the Darbar Hall, Darbar

Hall area and at different places of pilkhana. Out of

that situation, an army officer was coming towards the

under construction Sheed Fazlul Haque English

Medium School running. At that time two BDR rebels

opened fires on him from a short distance. As a result,

that army officer succumbed to the bullet injures

instantly.

The aforesaid fact of killing has been described in

the confessional statement of CS accused No 10 No-

77224 Sepoy Md. Sazzad Hossain who has stated in

his confessional statement among others as follows:-

.........MZ 25.02.09 Bs ZvwiL mKvj AvbygvwbK 7.30 Uvq `ievi c¨v‡i‡W hvIqvi Rb¨ Avwg cÖ¯‘wZ wbw”Qjvg| ZLb 13, ivB‡dj e¨v‡Uwjqv‡bi GKvD›U K¬vK© wmcvnx gBb G‡m Avgv‡K e‡j †Zvgvi `iev‡i †h‡Z n‡e bv; †Zvgvi IqvwK©s Av‡Q| †m Avgv‡K 24

e¨v‡Uwjqv‡bi ev‡¯‹U ej MÖvD‡Û mKvj 9.00 Uvq †h‡Z e‡j| Avwg

Zvi K_v g‡Zv †mLv‡b hvB| 1/2 wgwbU ci 44 e¨v‡Uwjqv‡bi wmcvnx

†mwjg mn 10/12 wmcvnx †mLv‡b Av‡m| GKRb Avgv‡K wR‡Ám K‡i GB †Q‡j GLv‡b Zzwg wK Ki| Avwg ewj Avwg IqvwK©s G G‡mwQ| gBb fvB Avgv‡K Avm‡Z e‡j‡Q| ZLb H †jvKwU Avgv‡K e‡j I gBb †Zvgv‡K Avm‡Z e‡j‡Q Zvn‡j wVK Av‡Q| Zzwg Avgv‡`i mv‡_ Avm| Avwg I‡`i mv‡_ mKvj AvbygvwbK 9.15 Uvi w`‡K GK‡hv‡M †m›Uªvj †Kv‡Z hvB| ZLb †gRi wmivR m¨vi `iRvq G‡m wR‡Ám K‡i

G evev †Zvgiv Kviv| m¨vi GB K_v ej‡ZB wmcvnx †mwjg mn Av‡iv

2 Rb m¨v‡ii gyL †P‡c a‡i| Zv‡K †e‡a †d‡j| m¨vi‡K Zvi wWDwU

i“‡g AvU‡K iv‡L| evB‡i †_‡K Zvjv jvwM‡q †`q| ZLb wivR

m¨v‡ii †gvevBj †dvbwU wmcvnx †mwjg †K‡o wb‡q Avgvi Kv‡Q †`q|

Avwg Zv wb‡Ri Kv‡Q †i‡L †`B| Zvici Avwg mn mevB †Kv‡Z hvB|

10/12 R‡bi g‡a¨ †KD †KD †Kv‡Zi Zvjv †f‡½ †d‡j| Avgiv mevB

†KvZ †_‡K A¯¿ †bB| Avwg GKwU Gm, Gg, wR †bB| cv‡kB g¨vMvwRb †_‡K ¸wj ‡jvW Kwi| Zvici `ievi n‡ji cv‡k myjZvb MÖvD‡Û P‡j hvB| Avwg dvKv dvqvi Kwi| Zvici wcjLvbvi wfZ‡i

wbg©vbvaxb knx` dRjyj nK Bswjk wgwWqvg ¯‹z‡ji w`‡K hvB| †`wL †h GKwU wcK Avc Mvox †_‡K `ievi n‡ji w`‡K ¸wj Qzo‡Q| GKRb Avwg© Awdmvi †`Šwo‡q Avgv‡`i w`‡K Avm‡Z wQj| Avgvi mv‡_ †h 2 Rb wQj Zviv m¨vi‡K ¸wj K‡i| Avgv‡KI ¸wj Ki‡Z e‡j| Avgvi

mv‡_ †h 2 Rb wQj Zv‡`i 1 Rb‡K wPwb| bvg wmcvnx kvnv`Z| †m UvÆy †kv Kivi Rb¨ G‡mwQj Ges 13, e¨vUvwjqv‡b mshy³Q wj| Avgvi mv‡_ _vKv 2 R‡bi K_vg‡Zv AvwgI ¸wj Kwi| Avgv‡`i ¸wj‡Z H Avwg© Awdmvi gviv hvq| Zvici Avgiv 13, ivB‡dj e¨v‡Uwjqv‡bi MÖvD‡Û P‡j hvB|

Place No-13 : Near the coconut tree situated at the

western side of the dining hall adjacent to cook

house behind the soldiers line of 44 Rifle Battalion.

It appears from the evidence of a prosecution

witness that on 25.02.2009, at around 9:45 a.m to

10:00 a.m, Sepoy Hashibul Hasan of 44 Battalion was

pulling an officer by holding color of his uniform and

brought him up to the canteen of Sadar Rifle Battalion.

During that time, Naik Shahajahan orchestra of Sadar Rifle Battalion with SMG came to the officer at that place, exchanged filthy languages and ordered the BDR rebels to kill the officer. Under the leadership of Naik Shahajahan, the BDR rebels caught and dragged the officer and tied his hands and legs to a coconut tree situated at the western side of the dining hall adjacent to cook house behind the soldiers line. Under the leadership of Naik Shahjahan, the BDR rebels started assaulting the officer repeatedly. Naik Shahjahan had a SMG with him while long sticks were also found at the hands of BDR rebels. After a while, under the leadership of Naik Shahjahan, the BDR rebels killed the said army officer by opening fires on him. The dead body of the aforesaid army officer was found lying therein till evening. 

The aforesaid fact of killing has been described

by PW 68 MLSS Md. Razibul Islam who has stated

in his evidence as under:-

.........25-2-09 mKvj 9 Uv 30 wgt `ievi n‡j ¸wj nIqvi

ci PxrKvi ï‡b Avwg K¨vw›U‡bi `iRv eÜ K‡i †`B| mKvj 9-45

‡_‡K 10 Uv i mgq K¨vw›U‡bi Rvbvjv w`qv ZvwK‡q †`wL 44 e¨vUvwjq‡bi ˆmwbK wmcvnx nvwQeyj nvmvb GKRb Awdmv‡i‡K wcQb w`K ‡_‡K Uniform Gi Kjvi a‡i Uvb‡Z Uvb‡Z K¨vw›Ub ch©š— wb‡q Av‡m| H mgq Av‡M e¨vUvwjq‡bi A‡Kóªv bv‡qK kvnRvnvb GKwU SMG mn NUbv¯’‡j Av‡m| †m Awdmv‡ii wbKU G‡m MvjvMvwj K‡i ˆmwbK‡`i‡K wb‡`©k †`q Awdmvi‡K †g‡i †dj‡Z| bv‡qK kvnRvnv‡bi †bZ…‡Z¡ Dcw¯ Z’ ˆmwbKiv Awdmvi‡K †U‡b wnP‡o jvB‡bi wcQ‡b †KvK nvDR msjMœ WvBwbs Gi cwðg cv‡k¦© bv‡Kj Mv‡Qi m‡½ nvZ cv Uvbv w`‡q ev‡a| Awdmvi‡K gvi‡Z _v‡K kvnRvnv‡bi †bZ…‡Z¡ ˆmwbKiv| kvnvRvnv‡bi Kv‡Q SMG wQj| Ab¨

ˆmwbK‡`i nv‡Z eo jvwU wQj| wKQz¶b ci H ¯’v‡b ¸wji kã kwyb| wKQz¶b ci †`wL m¨v‡ii (Awdmv‡ii) jvk c‡i Av‡Q| wKQz¶b c‡i mK‡ji nv‡Z A¯¿ †`wL| †KD †KD K¨vw›U‡b Lvevi wb‡Z G‡mwQj| mܨvi AvM ch©š— Awdmv‡ii jvk H Lv‡b c‡o wQj|

Place No-14: On the bank of pond behind the

Darbar Hall.

It appears from the evidence of prosecution

witnesses that on 25.02.2009, from the time of occurrence, the BDR rebels following their criminal

conspiracy killed the army officers in a cruel and brute

manner in and around the Darbar Hall and in different

places of the Pilkhana. After killing the army officers

in different places of Pilkhana, the BDR rebels in

order to conceal the dead body of the officers removed

the dead bodies from the place of killings under the

leadership of Naib Subedar Torab Ali, Havildar

Bashar and Naik Mokter. It appears from the confessional statements of accused that a dead body of

an army officer wearing black uniform was found at

the bank of a pond situated behind the Darbar Hall. Thereafter, under the leadership of Naib Subedar

Torab Ali, Havildar Bashar, Naik Mokter and others,

the BDR rebels namely Sepoy Shahadat Hossain,

Sepoy Shahjalal, Sepoy Rezaul Islam, Sepoy Sohel

Rana, Sepoy Md. Rabiul Islam, Sepoy Razib, Sepoy Thoyang Marma removed the dead body lifting the

same on the truck.    

The story of killing the army officer and removal

of the same from the bank of a pond is apparent from

the confessional statement of  No.80208 Sepoy Shahadat Hossain CS accused No.191; the relevant

portion of his confessional statement runs as follows:-

..........25/02/09 a¡¢lM ®i¡l Ae¤j¡e f¡yQV¡l pju O j¤ ®b−L E¢Wz gS−ll e¡j¡S f−s Ae¤j¡e p¡aV¡l pju q¡pf¡a¡m NË¡E−ä gm

Ce qCz.............Ae¤j¡e ¢hL¡m Q¡lV¡l pju H¢V¢V ®L¡pÑ Ll−a Bp¡ q¡¢hmc¡l h¡p¡l Bj¡−cl l¦−j H−p 7/8 Se−L fÊ¡¢ƒp ¢XEV ¢Ll¡l SeÉ °al£ q−a h−mz …¢ml n−ë Bjl¡ ®LE e¡ EW−m ®p h−m ®k, e¡−uh p¤−hc¡l ®a¡l¡h Bm£, ®g¡pÑ ®S¢pJ Bj¡−cl ®k−a h−m−Rz aMe

Bjl¡ H¢cL ®p¢cL ®R¡V¡ R¤¢V L−l f¡m¡−e¡l ®Qø¡ L¢lz B¢j Vu−m−V O¤j¡−e¡l ®Qø¡ Ll−m ®p h−m f¡¢m−u h¡yQ−a f¡lh¡e¡z ®p Bj¡−L pq ¢pf¡q£ 80251 n¡qS¡m¡m, ¢pf¡q£ 79975 ®lS¡Em Cpm¡j, ¢pf¡q£ ®p¡−qm l¡e¡, ¢pf¡q£ 80533 ®j¡x l¢hEm Cpm¡j, ¢pf¡q£ l¡¢Sh

80025 ˆ_ As j¡jÑ¡−cl−L e£−Q e¡j¡u J gm Ce Ll¡uz Bj¡−cl−L

36 l¡C−gm hÉ¡V¡¢mu¡−el NË¡Eä ¢c−u clh¡l q−m ¢e−u k¡uz aMe e¡−uL ®j¡š²¡l J q¡¢hmc¡l h¡n¡l H−p ®k¡N −cuz ®pM¡−e Ae j¤ ¡e

20/30 Se AÙ»d¡l£ ®f¡o¡L f¢l¢qa ¢h¢XBl pcpÉ−cl ®cM−a f¡Cz L−uLSe ¢h¢XBl pcpÉ−L fa¡L¡ ¢c−u j¤M h¡d¡ AhÙÛ¡u ®c¢Mz ®pM¡−e Ef¢ÙÛa Bj¡l ®L¡−pÑl ®VÊ¢ew ®S¢pJ e¡−uh p¤−h¡ cl ®a¡l¡h Bm£ e¡−uL ®j¡š²¡l Ef−l ¢h¢XBl q¡pf¡a¡m ¢fmM¡e¡u AY¡L¡−cl

®c¢Mz clh¡l q−ml ¢ial ®gÓ¡−l Q¡l¢V m¡n ®c¢Mz a¡l¡ ¢h¢XBl Hl ®f¡o¡L fs¡ ¢Rmz e¡−uh p¤−hc¡l ®a¡l¡h Bm£ pq AeÉ¡eÉ AÙ»d¡l£l¡

A−Ù»l j¤−M iu ®c¢M−u m¡n …¢m N¡s£−a a¥m−a h−mz ¢h¢XBl Hl HL¢V hs VÊ¡L clh¡l q−ml p¡j−e c¡s¡−e¡ ¢Rmz Bj¡l¡ m¡n a m¥ −a e¡

Q¡C−m a¡l¡ Bj¡−cl−L …¢m Ll−a EÜa quz Bjl¡ pL−m ¢j−m m¡n

…¢m VÊ¡−L E¢W−u ¢cCz flha£Ñ−a e¡−uh p¤−hc¡l ®a¡l¡h Bm£, q¡¢hcmc¡l h¡p¡l, e¡−uL ®j¡š²¡l J AÙ»d¡l£ 8/10 Se ¢j−m Bj¡−cl−L clh¡l q−ml ¢LR¤ f¤L¥l f¡−s ¢e−u k¡uz ®pM¡−e L¡−m¡ ®f¡o¡L fs¡ HLS−el m¡n ®cM−a f¡Cz a¡−cl ¢e−cÑ−n Bjl¡ Eš²

m¡n¢V I VÊ¡−L E¢W−u ¢cCz

The aforesaid fact of killing the army officer and

removal of the same from the bank of a pond is also

evident from the confessional statement of No. 34227

Havildar Medical Assistant Md. Abul Bashar CS

accused No.178; the relevant portion of his

confessional statement runs as follows:-

...........25/02/2009 a¡¢lM c¤f¤l p¡−s ¢aeV¡l pju A¡¢j

Hj A¡C l¦−j ¢Rm¡jz l¦−j ®V¢m−g¡e ®h−S EWm A¡¢j ¢l¢pi L¢lz

Afl fС¿¹ ®b−L e¡−uL p¤−hc¡l ®j¢XLÉ¡m pqL¡l£ ®a¡l¡hA ¡m£ A¡j¡−L 10Se ¢h¢V¢V °p¢eL pq clh¡l q−m â¦a k¡Ju¡l SeÉ A¡−cn

L−lez A¡¢j Hj A¡C l¦−j ®LE e¡C hm−m ¢a¢e A¡j¡−L −V¢m−g¡−e

h−me l¡−Me A¡fe¡l Hj A¡C l¦j ®hn£ Q¡m¡¢L Ll−he¡ â¦a L¡S Llz

A¡¢j aMe q¡pf¡a¡m °p¢eL m¡C−e k¡C Hhw e¡−uL p¤−hc¡l ®a¡l¡h

A¡m£l Lb¡ j−a¡ (1) ¢pf¡q£ l¡¢Sh ¢ju¡ (2 ) ¢pf¡q£ ®lS¡Em (3)

¢pf¡q£ ®j¡x n¡q¡c¡a (4) ¢pf¡q£ l¢hEm A¡mj (5) ¢pf¡q£ n¡qS¡m¡m (6) ¢pf¡q£ ¯b Aw j¡lj¡ (7) ¢pf¡q£ ®p¡−qm l¡e¡ pq 7 (p¡a) Se pqL¡−l A¡¢j ®f¡o¡L f¢l¢qa AhÙÛ¡u ¢hL¡m ®f±−e fy¡QV¡l ¢c−L

clh¡l q−m k¡C Hhw e¡−uL p¤−hc¡l ®a¡l¡h A¡m£l ¢eLV ¢l−f¡VÑ L¢lz

clh¡l q−ml ¢ial aMe ®cM−a f¡C ph ¢LR¤ i¡‰¡Q¤s¡ Hhw fÐQ¤l lš²

HM¡−e −pM¡−e R¢s−u A¡−R,4/5¢V jªa−cq ®gÓ¡−l f−l b¡L−a ®c¢Mz

jªa ®cq…¢ml j−dÉ A¡j¡l Lj¡−ä¾V L−eÑm j¢nEl lqj¡−el j aª −cq

¢Rmz AeÉ¡eÉ A¢gp¡−ll jªa−cq ¢Qe−a f¡¢l e¡Cz e¡−uL p¤−hc¡l

®a¡l¡h A¡m£ A¡j¡−L m¡n…¢m VÊ¡−L a¥−m ¢c−a h−m Hhw HlC j−dÉ 1V¡ 3 V¢e VÊ¡L clh¡l q−ml p¡j−e Q−m A¡−p z ¢e−cÑn® j¡a¡−hL

A¡¢jJ A¡j¡l p¡−b b¡L¡ p¡aSe ¢pf¡q£ 4¢V A¡¢jÑ A¢gp¡−ll m¡n

VÊ¡−L a¥−m ®cCz clh¡l q−m b¡L¡ AeÉ¡eÉ AÙ»d¡l£ SJu¡el¡ A¡j¡−cl−L clh¡l q−ml ¢fR−el j¡S¡−ll f¤L¥−ll f¡−s ¢e−u k¡uz

®pM¡−e a¡h¤l p¡j−e lÉ¡−hl −f¡o¡L f¢l¢qa AhÙÛ¡u ®jSl lÉ¡w−Ll

A¢gp¡−ll jªa ®cq −cM−a f¡Cz ®pM¡−e ®j¢XLÉ¡m pqL¡l£ e¡−uL ®j¡š²¡l−L m¡−nl f¡−n ®cM−a f¡Cz Bjl¡ m¡n VÊ¡L a ¢¥ m Hhw m¡n…¢m ¢eu¡ VÊ¡L clh¡l q−ml f§hÑ¢c−L Q−m k¡uz

Place No-15 : The left side of the entry gate of dairy

farm

It is visible from the evidence of a prosecution

witness that on 25.02.2009 and 26.02.2009, the BDR

rebels atrociously killed 74 persons including 57 army

officers in and around the Darbar Hall and in different

places of the Pilkhana. Following the decision of the government, on 27.02.2009 at around 10:30 a.m,

under the leadership of Brigade Commander of 46 Independent Infantry Brigade, 17 East Bengal, 4 East

Bengal, 2 East Bengal and other units of army entered

the Pilkhana for search and rescue operation through

gate No.4 of the Pilkhana. During the drive of search

and rescue operation, Major Kamrul of 2 East Bengal

came to see a dead body of an army officer at the left

side of the entry gate of the dairy farm. The dead body

could not be identified by that time as the same was

distorted one. 

The aforesaid fact of killing and tracing out of the

dead body of an army officer have been disclosed by

PW 535 Colonel Mohammad Abdul Alim Tafarder

who has stated in his evidence as under:-

............MZ 25/2/09 Zvs Avwg ZrKvjxb XvKv †mbvwbevm¯’ 46, m¦Z¯¿ c`vwZK we‡Mª‡Wi Aax‡b 17 †e½‡ji AwabvqK wnmv‡e Kg©iZ wQjvg|......... 26/2/09 Zvs ivwÎ Abygvb 11.00 Uvi w`‡K

we‡MªW KgvÛvi Avgv‡K Rvbvb †h, wewW Avi mv‡iÛvi K‡i‡Q| mvgwiK Awfhvb `iKvi †bB| mKv‡j wewW Avi Gi wfZ‡i Search

and Rescue operation  Ki‡Z n‡e| 27/2/09 Bs mKvj AvbygvwbK 8.00 Uvq Avgiv wewW Avi 4bs †MB‡U Dcw¯ Z’ n‡q Dnv Zvjve× †`wL| †mLv‡b AmsL¨vK cywjk I i¨ve m`m¨‡K cÖniviZ

Ae¯ v’ q †`wL| cywj‡ki mv‡_ cÖ‡qvRbxq mgb¦q †k‡l 27/2/09 Bs Zvs

mKvj AvbygvwbK 10.30 NwUKvq weª‡MW KgvÛvi mn H †MBU w`‡q wcjLvbvq cÖ‡ek Kwi| ZLb Avgvi mv‡_ †gRi IqvKvi, †gRi Bgivb, †gRi Av‡iwdb, †gRi AvRv`, K¨v‡Þb mvB`yj, K¨v‡Þb

AvRwg, K¨v‡Þb Av`bvb, K¨v‡Þb †iRv GjwU gvBbyj (cieZx©‡Z

kwn` gvBbyj) GjwU Avwmd, GjwU iv‡k`, I Ab¨vb¨ c`e‡ xZ © cÖvq

300 Rb Awdmvi I ‰mwbK wQj| wcjLvbvi wfZ‡i Avgvi Aaxb¯’ Awdmvi †`i `vwqZ¡ wQj Afqvib¨ Ges Awdmvm© †gm GjvKv †gRi IqvKvi, †gRi Bgivb I Ab¨vb¨ Awdmviiv Search and Rescue

Ki‡e| wWwR office complex  Gi `vwqZ¡ wQj †gRi AvRv‡`i

†gRi Av‡idx‡bi `vwqZ¡ wQj fvÛvi I †m›Uªvj g¨vMvwRb GjvKv|

Search and Rescue Gi `vwqZ¡ wnmv‡e †Kvb Awdmvi ev Ab¨ †Kn RxweZ ev AvUK _vK‡j Avwg Zv‡K †gMv‡dvb w`‡q WvKv WvwK KiwQjvg| Avwg wRwW Awd‡mi wcQ‡b cyKzi cv‡o Avgvi Ae¯v ’b ‡bB| †mLv‡b we‡`ªvnx‡`i Av¸b †`qv 2wU cÖvB‡fU Kvi ZLbI R¡jwQj| Avwg †eZvi h‡š¿i gva¨‡g Rvb‡Z cvwi wewfbœ ¯v ’‡b A¯¿ †Mª‡bW, †Mvjvevi“`, wewfbœ fv‡e Qvwo‡q wQwU‡q c‡o Av‡Q| Avgv‡`i

wcjLvbvq cÖ‡e‡ki c~‡e©B Gmwe cywjk i¨ve, dvqvi mvwf ©mI Ab¨vb¨ ms¯ v’ wfZ‡i cÖ‡ek K‡i| Avgiv Zv‡`i †mLv‡b wewfbœ Kvh©¨µg †`L‡Z cvB| Avgv‡`i d‡jv Avc wnmv‡e 4 Bó †e½j I 2 Bó †e½j wcjLvbvq cÖ‡ek K‡i, AZtci 2 Bó †e½‡ji †gRi Kvgi“j †mbv

Awdmv‡ii 1wU jvk †WBix dv‡g©i cÖ‡e‡ki †MB‡Ui evg cv‡k cvq| weK…Z _vKvq jvkwU ZLb kbv³ Kiv m¤¢e nqwb|

Place No-16:  Near gate No.5 of Pilkhana situated

at the southern side of the Darbar Hall.

It appears from the evidence of a prosecution

witness that on the date of occurrence on 25.02.2009,

one Subedar who was supposed to be promoted as

DAD on that day was coming crossing the road

situated in front of JCO quarters and beside the

southern side of the Darbar Hall. At that time, the said

Subedar and two BDR rebels were locked in conflict.

At one stage the aforesaid two BDR rebels shot him to

death. The said Subedar fell in the ground receiving

bullet injuries in a moment. After 5/7 minutes, the

three BDR rebels dragged Major Shahnewaz towards

gate No.5 of the Pilkhana. When Major Shahnewaz

was being taken towards gate No.5 of the Darbar Hall

raising his hands, a sound of firing was heard. After a

while Major Saleh was also being taken towards gate

No.5 by three BDR rebels and then a sound of firing

was heard. In that way, one Subedar, Major Shahnewaz and Major Saleh were killed therein and

their dead bodies were subsequently recovered from

the mass graves.

The aforesaid fact of killings has been described

by an eye witness namely PW 4 Colonel Shamsul

Alam Chowdhury who has stated in his evidence as follows:-

............Avwg eZ©gv‡b National Security intelligence

G Kg©iZ MZ 1-2-09 †_‡K 11-3-09 ch©š— Avwg wcjLvbvq 44

e¨vUvwjq‡bi AwabvqK wnmv‡e Kg©iZ wQjvg|...............mKvj mKvj Abygvb 9 NwUKvq cweÎ †Kvivb †Z‡jvqv‡Zi gva¨‡g 25-2-09 ZvwiL `ievi ïi “ nq| DG mv‡n‡ei `iev‡i e³e¨ cÖ`vb ïi“ K‡ib| wZwb wKQz¶b e³e¨ †`Iqvi GK ch©v‡q Wvj fvZ Kg©myPxi Dc‡i we¯ v—wiZ Av‡jvPbv ïi“ K‡ib| Avwg ZLb Awdmvi‡`i emvi 2q mvwi‡Z 3q †Pqv‡i emv wQjvg| DG g‡nv`q mK‡ji D‡Ï‡k¨ e‡jb †h, Avcbviv

wK H e¨vcv‡i me eyS‡Z †c‡i‡Qb ZLb ˆmwb‡Ki Reve Avkb vyi“c bv nIqvq wZwb cybivq Wvjfv‡Zi Dci we¯ v—wiZ e³e¨ ïi“ K‡ib| GK

ch©v‡q wZwb e‡jb Wvjfv‡Zi D™¢‚Z A_© ev jf¨vsk BDR Gi Kj¨v‡b

e¨vq Kiv n‡e| ZLb DG g‡nv`‡qi evg cv‡k¦© n‡Z I `ievi n‡ji `w¶b cye© †Kvbv n‡Z GKRb ˆmwbK A¯¿ wb‡q DG g‡nv` i w`‡K

†`Š‡o Avm‡Z _v‡K| Avwg ZLb PxrKvi K‡i ai ai Ki‡Z Ki‡Z †÷‡Ri w`‡K †`Šwo‡q hvB| mv‡_ mv‡_ knx` K‡Y©j gywRe, K‡Y©j AvwbQ, I K‡Y©j Gjvnx mn Av‡iv A‡b‡K †÷‡R D‡V c‡ob| BwZ g‡a¨ H ˆmwbK DG g‡nv`‡qi gv_vi evgcv‡k¦© ivB‡d‡ji e¨v‡ij jvwM‡q †d‡j‡Q| H †Q‡jUv‡K ZLb L–e bvf v© m g‡b nw”Qj Avwg

GwM‡q wM‡q 13 ivB‡d‡ji e¨vUvwjq‡b D³ ˆmwbK gvBb‡K a‡i †dwj

Ges GK SUKvq A‡¯¿i e¨v‡ij wd« K‡i †dwj| †mB gyû‡Z© †÷‡R Dcw¯ Z’ weªt †Rbv‡ij evix (whwb GB NUbvq wbnZ) knx` K‡Y©j AvwbQ, knx` K¨v‡Þb gvbœvb, knx` j¨vt K‡Y©j Gjvnx mn AviI wKQy

Awdmvi gvBb‡K cvKovI K‡i †÷‡R †d‡j †`q| Avwg ZLb DG

g‡nv`q‡K `ievi †_‡K P‡j †h‡Z Aby‡iva Kwi|D G g‡nv`q e‡jb

`ievi n‡e| †Zvgiv Troops Control Ki| †mB g‚û‡Z© †÷R †_‡K

wb‡P †b‡g Avwm Ges Troops ‡`i wbqš¿b Kivi †Póv Ki‡Z _vwK|

ZLb `ievi n‡ji cwðg `iRvq w`K †_‡K GK ivDÛ dvqv‡ii

AvIqvR ïb‡Z cvwi| Gi ci AviI K‡qK ivDÛ ¸wji kã cvB|

BwZg‡a¨ `ievi nj †_‡K BZ¯ Z— wew¶ß Ae¯ v’ q †h hvi gZ cvjv‡Z

ïi “ K‡i‡Q Avwg dvqvi Kiv ‰mwbK‡`i Zvov Ki‡Z ewj Ges wb‡RI Zvov Kwi| †m g‚û‡Z© `ievi n‡ji DËi cv‡k¦©i gv‡V Avwg 6/7 Rb

BDR ‰mwbK‡K †ej Uzcx Qvov wew¶ßfv‡e NyivNywi Ki‡Z †`wL| †mB g‚û‡Z© `iev‡ii wfZ‡i Dcw¯ Z’ Awdmv‡iiv wKsKZ©e¨ weg~p n‡q hvB

Ges JCO iv wKQz eyS‡Z cviwQj bv Avwg DG mv‡n‡ei Kv‡Q Stage

G P‡j Avwm| Avwg ZLb K‡Y©j AvwbQ mn Ab¨vb¨ Awdmvi‡`i‡K DG g‡nv`q‡K Mvwo‡Z K‡i wb‡q †h‡Z Aby‡iva Kwi| AvwgD G mv‡ne‡K P‡j †h‡Z Aby‡iva Ki‡Z _vwK| DG mv‡n‡ei MvoxwU

ZL‡bv `vo Kiv‡bv wQj| DG g‡nv`q ZLb Av‡`k †`b †Zvgiv

†Zvgv‡`i Troops Control Ki Ges Zv‡`i‡K wfZ‡i Avb| `ievi

n‡e| Avwg ZLb Stage †_‡K wb‡P †b‡g hvB| Awdmviiv QzUvQzwU Ki‡Q †KD †KD RU cvwK‡q Av‡jvPbv Ki‡Q| Avwg Zv‡`i ewj DG g‡nv`q Troops Control K‡i wfZ‡i Avb‡Z e‡j‡Qb| Avwg DG

wb‡`©k cvj‡bi R‡b¨ Troops †`i wfZ‡i Avbq‡bi j‡¶¨ cÖavb

dUK w`‡q evB‡i †h‡Z _vwK `ievi nj ZLb Lvwj n‡q †M‡Q| Avwg

hvevi mgq Avgvi wcQz wcQz LT. K‡Y©j Gbv‡qZ AwabvqK 36 e¨v‡Uwjqb, ‡gRi kvn‡bIqvR, †gRi ûgvqyb, †gRi mv‡jn I †gRi

knx` mn AviI wKQz Awdmvi‡K Avgv‡K Abymib Ki‡Z †`wL hvev mgq `ievi n‡ji Dcw¯ Z’ JCO  ‡`i Avwg wb‡`©k †`B Troops

Control Ki‡Z|..............ZLb 5 bs †M‡Ui w`K †_‡K K‡qKRb‡K

eªvk dvqvi Ki‡Z Ki‡Z Avgv‡`i w`‡K Avm‡Z †`wL Z_v Dc¯ Z’

mK‡jB ‡`Šov †`Šwo ïi“ K‡i Avgv‡K J C O iv av°v‡Z _v‡K Avgvi

wbKU¯’ J C O  †KvqvU©v‡i cÖvPx‡ii cv‡k¦© Avkªq †bB| ZLb Avgvi Ae¯ v’ b †_‡K 10-12 MR `y‡i GKRb ˆmwbK‡K `ievi nj  ¨K‡i

¸wj  Pvjv‡Z  †`wL|..............ZLb J.C.O  †KvqvU©v‡i  3  Zvjvq Avgv‡K wb‡q hvq J.C.O iv| Avwg evmvq XyKvi mgq †KD †KD wb‡P †b‡g Av‡m I my‡e`vi BmgvBj my‡e`vi wmivR bvt myi ‡e m `v vB`yj I

bvt my‡e`vi iwng I nvwej`vi RvwKi Avgvi mvg‡b wQj|A vwg ZLb

BDwbdg© cwiwnZ| Avwg 3 Zvjvq Xy‡K Rvbvjv w`‡q evwn‡ii Ae¯ v’ b †`wL|  `ievi n‡j `w¶b cv‡k 20/22 Rb mk¯¿ ˆmwbK ¸wj KiwQj|

`ievi  n‡ji  wfZ‡i  ZLb  jvMvZvi  ¸wji   cvB|  Avwg  ZLb Amnvq n‡q cwo| Avjv−n Zvqvjvi mvnvh¨ cÖv_©Yv Kwi| ZLb `ievi n‡ji w`K †_‡K GKRb my‡e`vi †mw`bD AD c‡` c`vbœwZ cvevi

K_v wQj †m iv¯ v— cvi nIqvi mgq 2 Rb BDR wmcvnxi mv‡_ K_v

KvUv KvwU nw”Qj| GK ch©v‡q H ˆmwb‡Kiv DAD  ‡K ¸wj K‡i|

wZwb  ZLb  iv¯ v—q  jywU‡q  c‡ob|  Gi  5/7  wgwbU  c‡i  †gRi kvn‡bIqvR‡K nvZ Dc‡i Zz‡j 3 Rb ˆmwbK wcQ‡b A¯¿ a‡i 5 bs †M‡Ui w`‡K wb‡q hvw”Qj wKQz `yi hvIqv c‡i ¸wji kã cvB Gi wKQz¶‡bi g‡a¨B †gRi mv‡jn‡K nvZ Dc‡i Zz‡j 3 Rb ‰mwbK A¯¿ ZvK K‡i 5 bs †M‡Ui w`‡K wb‡q hvq wKQz¶b c‡i ¸wji kã cvB| Avwg ZLb nZvk n‡q cwo| `ievi n‡ji wfZ‡i I evB‡i ¸wji AvIqvR cvB |    

Place No-17: DG Bungalow (Rifle Bhaban/DG

residence)

Coming through the evidence of a prosecution

witness and the confessional statements of the

accused, it is apparent that on 25.02.2009 at around

11:30 a.m the BDR rebels namely Sepoy Selim Reza,

Sepoy Obaidul, Sepoy Ibrahim, Sepoy Altaf, Sepoy

Habib, Sepoy Shahin, Sepoy Mohsin, Havildar Jashim

and 10/15 other BDR rebels attacked the DG

Bungalow and wanted to enter the DG Bungalow. At

that time, guard commander of DG Bungalow PW 40

Havildar Md. Babul Miah intercepted the BDR

rebels from entering into DG Bungalow. At that point of time, Sepoy Selim Reza of 44 Rifle Battalion opened fires on PW 40 Havildar Md. Babul Miah causing injuries in his left hip as a result of which PW 40 Havildar Md. Babul Miah  fell down on the ground. In the meantime, under the leadership of Sepoy Selim Reza, the aforesaid BDR rebels entered the DG Bungalow opening fires violently. Entering into DG Bungalow the aforesaid BDR rebels physically tortured and abused wife of DG Naznin Shakil Shipu in inhuman and butcherly manner and ultimately killed her by opening fires on her. Colonel Delwar (retired), a friend of DG BDR and Mrs. Rowsuni Fatema Akter Lovely (wife of Colonel Delwar) who came there as guest were also mercilessly killed by the BDR rebels at the DG Bungalow. A maid servant of DG Bungalow namely

Kolpana Begum aged about 15/20 years was also

physically abused and violated by the BDR rebels and

then she was ruthlessly and unmercifully killed by the

BDR rebels on opening fires on her. On that fateful

day, Mali (Gardener) Md. Firoz Miah was also killed

by the BDR rebels on opening fires on him.

The story of aforesaid killings has been narrated

by PW 40 Havildar Md. Babul Miah who has stated

in his evidence as follows:-

...........MZ 25-2-09 Zvwi‡L mKvj 7 NwUKvq wWwR Gi evs‡jvq MvW© KgvÛvi wnmv‡e Avgvi `vwqZ¡ wQj| H w`b c~e©eZ©x MvW© KgvÛvi nvwej`vi †iRvD‡ji wbKU †_‡K `vqxZ¡ ey‡S †bB|A vgvi

mv‡_ bv‡qK nvmgZ, bv‡qK mvbvDjv−n j¨vÝ bv‡qK †gv¯ d—v, wmcvnx

Gikv`, wmcvnx wRqv, wmcvnx gweb, wmcvnx †gv¯ d—v g myg, mygb,

Rvdi Kvgi“j nvwdR gÄy mn 13 Rb duty †Z wQj| evs‡jvq wZbwU

Post G MvW© †gvZv‡qb Kwi I †PK Kwi| mKvj 8 NwUKvq wWwR g‡nv`q miKvix Mvox‡hv‡M evmv †_‡K †ei nb| 8.50 wgwb‡U wW R

g‡nv`q `ievi n‡ji w`‡K hvb| mKvj 9.30 wgt `ievi n‡ji w`‡K

¸wji kã ïwb| MvW©‡`i mZK© Kwi| Avwg 44 e¨vUvwjq‡b AwabvqK

†jt Kt mvgm Gi m‡½ †hvMv‡hv‡Mi †Póv Kwi †dv‡b wKš‘ cvwiwb|

c‡i wmcvnx †mwjg †iRv, wmcvnx Ievq`yj, wmcvnx Beªvnxg, wmcvnx AvjZvd, wmcvnx nvwee, wmcvnx kvnxb, wmcvnx gnmxb,nwvej`vi Rwmg mn Abygvb 10/15 Rb wewWAvi we‡`ªvnx wWwR Gi evs‡jvq Av‡mb| Avwg Zv‡`i cª‡e‡k evav w`‡j wmcvnx †mwjg †iRv Avgv‡K

j¶¨ K‡i ¸wj Qz‡i| D³ ¸wj Avgvi evg wn‡c ‡j‡M ¸“ iZ¡i hLg

nq| Avwg gvwU‡Z c‡o hvB| Zvnviv ¸wj Ki‡Z Ki‡Z wWwR Gi evs‡jvi wfZ‡i cª‡ek K‡i| Gi wKQz c‡i evs‡jvi wfZ‡i PxrKvi I

¸wji kã cvB| Avgvi ¸wjwe× ¯’v‡b cÖPzi i³¶ib nw”Qj|A vgv‡K

evPuvI e‡j PxrKvi Kwi| ZLb evs‡jvi GKwU Pickup Mvox Av‡m|

j¨vÝ bv‡qK †gv¯—dv I e`i“j Avgv‡K Mvox‡Z Zz‡j †`q| †g¯ vd—v

Avgv‡K wb‡q wewWAvi nmwcUv‡j fwZ© K‡i| 25-2-09 Zvwi‡L Avgv‡K nwj d¨vwgwj nmwcUv‡j †bq ivZ 8 Uvi w`‡K †mLv‡b Wv³vi‡`i gva¨‡g Rvb‡Z cvwi Avgvi evg wn‡c 3Uv ¸wj †j‡M‡Q|

Wvb cv‡k Urinal blader G GKUv ¸wj Av‡Q| BDwib ev−Wv‡i

BbRyixi K_vI Wv³vi Rvbvq| MZ 16-3-09 PxwKrmv †k‡l wcwR nvmcvZv‡j ¯’vbvš—i Kiv nq| 13/5/09 wPwKrmv †k‡l wewW Avi nvmcvZv‡j ¯’vbvš—i Kiv nq| 29-10-09 ch©š— wewWAvi nvmcvZv‡j PxwKrmvaxb wQjvg| we‡`ªvnx‡`i GKwU ey‡jUG L‡bv Avgvi

kix‡i Av‡Q| 

The story with regard to alamots and marks of the

aforesaid killings has been narrated by  PW 536

Brigadier General Waker-Uz-Zaman  who has

stated in his evidence as follows:-

............Avwg MZ 25/02/09 Bs Zvs XvKv †mbvwbev‡m Aew¯ Z’ 17 B÷ †e½ †iwR‡g‡›Ui Dc-AwabvqK wn‡m‡e Kg©iZ wQjvg | H

w`b AvbygvwbK mKvj 9Ð30 Uvq Avgvi AwabvqK Lt. Col.  Avjxg

Avgv‡K Rvbvb †h wcjLvbvq wewWAvi m`m¨iv MÛ‡Mvj Ki‡Q| †mLv‡b Avgv‡`i †h‡Z n‡e| Avwg Awabvq‡Ki Av‡`‡k 40 R‡bi GKwU Troops  I A¯¿ †Mvjvevi“` wb‡q wcjLvbvi D‡Ï‡k¨ mKvj AvbygvwbK 10.10 NwUKvi D‡Ï‡k¨ i³bv Kwi| wcjLvbvi 4 bs †MB‡Ui 100-150 MR Dˇi mvZ gmwR` ‡ivW¯’ ¯’v‡b mKvj AvbygvwbK 10.45 NwUKvq †cŠQvB | ZLb wcjLvbvi wfZ‡i cÖPÛ †Mvjv¸wj n‡”Q | Avwg Troops ‡K Disment  K‡i Deploy Kwi

Ges wfZi w`‡q †n‡U Rvcvb evsjv‡`k nvmcvZv‡ji Qv` †_‡K wcjLvbvi wfZ‡i wK n‡”Q †evSvi †Póv Kwi| Avwg †mLv‡bB cieZ©x Av‡`‡ki Rb¨ Ae¯ v’ b Ki‡Z _vwK|...........27/02/09 Zvs AvbygvwbK mKvj 8.30 Uvi w`‡K wb‡`©k Av‡m †h wewWAvi AvZ¥mgc b© K‡i‡Q| Operation  `iKvi †bB| wcjLvbvq wfZ‡i Search

rescue operation Ki‡Z n‡e| GKB w`‡b 10.15-10.30  NwUKvi g‡a¨ Avgvi AwabvqK Awdmvi I Troops mn wcjLvbvi 4

bs †MB‡U †M‡j Dnv Zvjve× †`L‡Z cvB| †mLv‡b Police, RAB

Ges †emvgwiK ‡cvkv‡K †Mv‡q›`viv Dcw¯ Z’ | wQj| AZtci cywj‡ki mv‡_ mgš^q mva‡bi gva¨‡g H †MBU w`‡q Avgiv wcjLvbvi wfZ‡i cÖ‡ek Kwi|...........Avwg wWwR-i evs‡jv, `ievi nj Ges wewfbœ Awdmvm© †KvqvUv©‡i hvB| `ievi nj I wWwR-i evs‡jv‡Z nZ¨vh‡Ái wPý †`L‡Z cvB| wWwR-i evs‡jvi nZ¨vh‡Ái wKQz AvjvgZ I wPý Avgvi e¨w³MZ †gvevBj ‡dv‡b Avwg avib Kwi| cieZ©x‡Z Avwg Dnv

wmwW‡Z Convert Kwi| H wmwW Av`vj‡Zi AbygwZ µ‡g Display

Ki‡Z PvB| H wmwW wU `vwLj Kijvg hv e¯— cÖ`k©bx- CL XXXIV

wnmv‡e wPwýZ (AvcwË mnKv‡i)| Avwg wWwR- i evs‡jv‡Z nZ¨vhÁ, fvsPzi I jyUcv‡Ui AvjvgZ †`‡LwQ|

The aforesaid fact of killing is evident from the confessional statement of  No. 70906 Sepoy Md.

Ibrahim of 44 Rifle Battalion CS accused No.68; the

relevant portion of his confessional statement runs as

follows:-

........... 25/02/09 Zvwi‡L `ievi n‡j Qwe †Zvjvi `vwqZ¡ Avgvi wQj| ZvB H w`b mKvj 8.00 Uvi mgq Avwg 44 e¨vUvwjq‡bi Awd‡m hvB Ges †mLvb n‡Z miKvix K¨v‡giv wb‡q `ievi n‡j hvB| Avwg `ievi n‡j †µ÷ mvRvB Ges Ab¨vb¨‡`i mv‡_ cÖ¯—ywZg~jK Kv‡R mvnvh¨ Kwi| `iev‡ii Qwe †Zvjvi Rb¨ Avwg QvovI AviI 4

Rb ˆmwbK wQj- Ab¨ e¨vUvwjq‡bi|........... wWwR m¨vi 9.00 Uvq

`iev‡i Av‡mb| Avwg Qwe †Zvjvi Rb¨ cÖ_‡g †÷‡R wWwR m¨v‡ii

evg cv‡k¦© wQjvg, c‡i Kvh© weeiYx cvV Gi mgq Wvb cv‡k¦© P‡j Avwm|.............Avwg ZLb Awdm n‡Z ‡ei n‡q ‡m›U«vj †KvqvU©vi MvW©-G hvB| A¯¿ Avbvi Rb¨| †KvZ †_‡K Avwg GKUv ivB‡dj Ges 20 ivDÛ ¸wj †bB| A¯¿ wb‡q Avwg nvU‡Z nvU‡Z m`i e¨vUvwjq‡bi Awd‡mi mvg‡b Avm‡j 15/20 Rb mk¯¿ BDR †K †`wL| Gi gv‡S

Avwg 44 e¨vUvwjq‡bi wmcvnx †mwjg, wmcvnx AvjZvd, wmcvnx nvwee, wmcvnx Ievq`yi‡K wPb‡Z cvwi| cÖvq 11.30 Uvi w`‡K Avwg, wmcvnx †mwjg, wmcvnx nvwee, wmcvnx AvjZvd, wmcvnx Ievq`yi, wmcvnx kvnxb mn 15/20 Rb BDR wWwR m¨v‡ii evs‡jv‡Z hvB| evs‡jvi †MB‡Ui mvg‡b feb MvW© nvwej`vi eveyj evav w`‡j wmcvnx †mwjg cv‡q ¸wj K‡i eveyj‡K †d‡j †`q| evsjv‡Z ¸wj| duvKv dvqvi

Ki‡Z _vwK| Avwg 02 ivDÛ duvKv ¸wj Kwi| wWwR g¨vWvg †`vZjv n‡Z †b‡g Av‡mb| ci‡b g¨vw· wQj| g¨vWvg‡K wmuwo‡Z nvwee, AvjZvd, †mwjg Avi 2/3 Rb a‡i †d‡j Ges gyL †e‡a †d‡j| Avwg

Avi Ievq`yi cv‡k `uvovBqv wQjvg| Zvici g¨vWvg‡K KzK nvD‡R

wb‡q wmcvnx nvwee, wmcvnx †mwjg, wmcvnx Ievq`yi, Avwg mn 3/4 Rb wg‡j jvwÂZ Kwi| Gici 2 Rb wmcvnx †`vZvjvq D‡V wM‡q duvKv

dvqvi K‡i Ges wRwbmcÎ ZQbQ K‡i| Gici AviI 2/3 Rb mn Avwg †`vZvjvq hvB| wM‡q †`wL 3 Rb BDR 15/20 erm‡ii GKwU

†g‡q‡K kvixwiKfv‡e wbh©vZb Ki‡Z‡Q|  †g‡qwUi KvbœvKvwUi Rb¨ Avwg `yB ivDÛ ¸wj Kwi| †g‡qwU gviv hvq| nVvr bx‡P ¸wji kã cvB| bx‡P †b‡g †`wL g¨vWvg‡K ¸wj K‡i nZ¨v Kiv nq| wmcvnx †mwjg mn AviI 2/3 Rb ¸wj K‡i| Zvici Avwg mn Ab¨vb¨iv evs‡jv n‡Z †ei n‡q Awdmvm© †KvqvU©vi Gi wZbZjvi GKUv evmvq hvB|

The aforesaid fact of killing is evident from the confessional statement of  No.77594 Sepoy Md. Obaidul Islam of 44 Rifle Battalion CS accused No.48; the relevant portion of his confessional statement runs as follows:-

........... 25/02/09 Cw a¡¢lM 6.30 ¢j¢eV HL¢V jC Hhw 1¢V ®V¢hm ¢e−u B¢j, q¡¢hmc¡l L¡−nj, ¢pf¡q£ B−a¡u¡l, ¢pf¡q£ j¤š²¡¢cl, ¢pf¡q£ n¢gL¥m pq ®j¡V 13 Se Ju¡¢LÑ NË¡E−ä (RSB) k¡Cz

pL¡m 7 V¡l ¢c−L ¢pf¡q£ ®p¢mj Bj¡l ®j¡h¡C−m Lm ¢c−u Bj¡−L J B−a¡u¡l−L m¡C−el p¡j−e Bp−a h−mz E−õMÉ ®p¢mj Bj¡−cl ®L¡Çf¡e£l LÓ¡LÑz Bjl¡ a¡lfl ®j−p e¡Ù¹¡l SeÉ k¡C aMe ¢pf¡q£ ChС¢qj H−p h−m, Bj¡−L J B−a¡u¡l−L ®p¢mj i¡C clh¡l q−m ®k−a h−m−Rz Bjl¡ clh¡l q−m ®N−m ChС¢qj clh¡l q−m Y¤−L k¡u Hhw Bjl¡ clh¡l q−ml f¢ÕQj ¢c−L ¢fR−el clS¡u c¡ys¡Cz............Aaxfl Bjl¡ DG j−q¡c−ul h¡p¡l ¢c−L k¡Cz ¢N−u ®c¢M ®pM¡−e ¢pf¡q£ q¡¢hh J ¢pf¡q£ ®p¢mj pq 10/15 Se ®m¡L z Bjl¡ ph¡C f−l h¡p¡l ¢ial Y¤L−m ¢pf¡q£ q¡¢hh J ¢pf¡q£ ®p¢mj

g¡L¡ …¢m L−lz g¡u¡−ll në ö−e DG jÉ¡X¡j ¢e−Q ®e−j Bp−m ¢pf¡q£ q¡¢hh J ¢pf¡q£ ®p¢mj pq 3/4 Se DG jÉ¡X¡j ®L d−l ®g−mz ¢pf¡q£ ®p¢mj a¡l S¡j¡ d−l V¡e¡ ®qQs¡ Ll−a b¡−L Hhw HL fkÑ¡−u a¡−L n¡¢ll£L i¡−h ¢ekÑ¡ae m¡¢’a L−l Bj¡l p¡j−ez Aaxfl Bjl¡ 2 am¡ E−W k¡Cz f−l ö−e¢R ¢pf¡q£ q¡¢hh J B−l¡J 1

Se DG jÉ¡X¡j-®L n¡¢ll£L i¡−h m¡¢’a L−l−Rz c¤C am¡u EW−aC DG jÉ¡X¡−jl L¡−Sl ®j−u−L …¢m L−l p¡j−e  ®b−L j¤−M¡nd¡l£ HLSez ¢àa£u am¡u Civil ®f¡o¡−L HLSe f¤l¦o J HLSe j¢qm¡−L ®cM−a f¡Cz aMe j¤−M¡n d¡l£ HLSe hÊ¡n g¡u¡l L−lz B¢j J B−a¡u¡l aMe 1 l¡Eä L−l a¡−cl …¢m L¢l Hhw a¡l¡ avre¡v j¡l¡

k¡uz f−l öe−a f¡C a¡l¡ L−eÑm ®c−m¡u¡l J a¡q¡l Ù»£z Aaxfl j¤−M¡nd¡l£ HLSe L−eÑm ®c−m¡u¡−ll Ù»£l j¡b¡l Efl T.V ®g−m

phÑ−no BO¡a L−lz Bjl¡ Aaxfl e£−Q ®e−j ®c¢M Cook Hl

clS¡l p¡j−e D.G jÉ¡X¡−jl m¡nz a¡l m¡n aMe lš²¡š² J nl£−ll

¢h¢iæ S¡uN¡u e¡e¡ lLj BO¡−al ¢Qq² ®c¢Mz ®pM¡−e ®b−L B¢j J B−a¡u¡l 3ew ®N−Vl L¡−R l¡Ù¹¡l f§hÑ f¡−nÄÑ DAD ®L¡u¡VÑ¡−l B¢pz

The aforesaid fact is partly evident from the confessional statement of  No. 71496 Sepoy Md.

Ershad Ali of 44 Rifle Battalion CS accused

No.687; the relevant portion of his confessional

statement runs as follows:-

………...f§−hÑl ¢euj Ae¤k¡u£ 25/2/09 a¡¢l−M pL¡m 7 V¡u ¢X¢S j−q¡c−ul h¡p ih−e N¡XÑ ¢XE¢V−a ¢e−u¡¢Sa qCz CeQ¡SÑ ¢R−me q¡¢hmc¡l h¡h¤m ®q¡−pe Hhw e¡−uL q¡nja Bm£z Ae¤j¡e 8.00 V¡l ¢c−L (25.2.09) ¢X¢S, ¢h¢XBl h¡p¡ ®b−L ®hl q−u A¢g−p k¡e Hhw Ae¤j¡e 9.00 V¡l ¢c−L clh¡l q−m k¡ez 9.15/9.20 V¡l ¢c−L

15/20 Se j¤−M¡nd¡l£ ¢h¢XBl pcpÉ AÙ» q¡−a ¢e−u Bj¡l ¢fRe ®b−L H−p h¤−L AÙ» d−lz B¢j Bj¡l AÙ» ¢e−u c¡y¢s−u ¢Rm¡jz A−Ù» …¢m ¢Rm e¡z N¡XÑ Lj¡ä¡l q¡¢hx h¡h¤m ®q¡−pe h¡yd¡ ¢c−m a¡−L …¢m L−lz 3/4 V¡ …¢m a¡l ®f−V m¡−Nz N¡−XÑ ®j¡V 13 Se ¢Rm¡jz

The aforesaid fact is partly evident from the confessional statement of  No. 7738 Sepoy Md.

Mohsin Ali of 24 Rifle Battalion CS accused

No.386; the relevant portion of his confessional

statement runs as follows:-

...........25/02/2009 Bs‡iRx mKvj Abygvb †cŠ‡b bqUvi w`‡K `ievi n‡j hvB| `ievi n‡j gvS eivei `w¶b cv‡k †d¬v‡i ewm| GKRb we,wW, Avi m`m¨ wW,wR, mv‡n‡ei e³„Zvi gS v Lv‡b

wW,wR, mv‡n‡ei evg w`‡Ki `iRv w`‡q A¯¿ mn `ievi n‡j cÖ‡ek

Ki‡j ‰n‰P ïi“ n‡q hvq| A‡b‡Ki mv‡_ AvwgI `ievi nj †_‡K

†ei n‡q †`Š‡o  Avgvi  24 e¨vUvwjq‡bi jvB‡b  P‡j hvB|...........ZLb  Avwg †m›Uªvj †KvqvU©vi  Mv‡W© hvB  Ges B †Kv¤cvbxi †KvZ n‡Z GKwU  ivB‡dj  wbB|  Zvici  24 e¨vUvwjq‡bi g¨vMwR‡b wM‡q 50 ivDÛ ¸wj wbB| ivB‡d‡j ¸wj †jvW K‡i K‡qK ivDÛ duvKv  ¸wj Kwi|..........mKvj Abygvb 10.00Uvi w`‡K wW,wR, mv‡n‡ei evmvi w`‡K hvB| wW,wR mv‡n‡ei evmvq Xy‡K 7/8 Rb ‰mwbK‡K †`wL| Zviv wW,wR mv‡‡ nei evmv fvsPyi KiwQj| Avwg wmwo w`‡q †`vZjvq D‡V †Uwj‡dvb jvBb wew”Qbœ K‡i w`B| Avwg WªBs i“‡gi wUwf‡Z ¸wj Kwi| †Uwe‡ji Wªqvi Ly‡j GKwU †gvevBj †c‡q †fs‡M †dwj| nVvr K‡ i Avgvi wc‡V GKwU ¸wj jv‡M| ZLb Avwg wb‡R 2q Zjv n‡Z bx‡P †b‡g Avwm| HLv‡b 24 e¨vUvwjq‡bi nvwej`vi Rmxg‡K A¯¿ mn

†`L‡Z cvB| Avwg Avgvi A¯¿ I ¸wj Zv‡K w`B| iv¯—v w`‡q bxj

i‡Oi wcKAvc hvIqvi mgq MvwowU _vgvB| WªvBfvi Mvox‡Z K‡i Avgv‡K we,wW,Avi nvmcvZv‡j †cŠ‡Q †`q|  

Evidence with regard to conducts, behaviours and utterances of the BDR rebels during commission of the offences.

It is worthwhile to mention that on 25.02.2009 at 9:00 a.m, a Darbar was started at the Darbar Hall being presided over by DG BDR with the recitation from the Holy Quran. About 97 army officers of different ranks and about 2500/3000 BDR soldiers were present at the Darbar Hall. After starting Darbar, DG BDR started delivering his speeches on Dal-Vhat programme and other matters. When DG BDR was delivering speeches, one Sepoy Moin of 13 Rifle Battalion entered the Darbar Hall taking arms and then pointed arms at DG BDR. During that time Sepoy Kazol of 44 Rifle Battalion also entered the Darbar Hall following Sepoy Moin. The army officers present over there caught hold of Sepoy Moin and disarmed him. At that time Sepoy Kazol left the Darbar Hall as quickly as possible. Then there was a sound of firing as a result of which one of the BDR members chanted a slogan ‘Jago’. Thereafter a chaotic situation was started at the Darbar Hall and many BDR soldiers stood up from their seats. On that situation DG BDR asked all the BDR personnel to sit in their respective seats being calm and quiet and wanted to hear the problems of the BDR personnel. But the BDR personnel started leaving the Darbar Hall breaking down the glasses of the doors and the windows disobeying the order of the DG. Then the DG BDR further asked the BDR personnel to take their respective seats, but they did not pay any heed to the order of DG BDR. Finding no alternative, the DG BDR directed all the commanders to manage and control the troops of their respective units. Following

the time of occurrence at the Darbar Hall and in other

places at Pilkhana the BDR rebels uttered that there

shall not be any army officer in BDR force and they

also uttered some highly objectionable speeches

against army officers. The following witnesses heard

the objectionable utterances from the mouth of the

BDR rebels, as they were present at the places of occurrences.   

PW 19 Naik-53962, Md. Keramot Ali Sheikh,

Dhaka Sector, Pilkhana, Dhaka has stated in his

evidence that.......25/02/09 Zvwi‡L Avwg wWwR Gi `iev‡i Dcw¯’Z wQjvg| Abygvb 9 Uvq `ievi ïi“ n q| ïi “i 20/25 wgwbU

c‡i wWwR Gi e³e¨ PjvKv‡j 13 e¨vUvwjq‡b gvBb mk¯¿ Ae¯v’ q `ievi n‡j cÖ‡ek K‡i I Stage G D‡V wWwR eivei A¯¿ ZvK K‡i|

44 e¨vUvwjq‡bi KvRj A¯¿ nv‡Z `ievi n‡j cÖ‡ek K‡i| Ab¨vb¨ AwdmviMY wmcvnx gBb‡K wbi¯¿ K‡i| wmcvnx KvRj `ievi nj

†_‡K †ei n‡q hvq| Rv‡Mv e‡j wPrKvi K‡i, A‡bK wewWAvi m`m¨ `vwo‡q hvq| wewWAvi m`m¨iv `ievi nj Z¨vM Ki‡Z _v‡K|  

PW  43  Havildar-27393  Medical  Assistant  Md.

Selim  Sarwar  of  BDR  Hospital  has  stated  in  his

evidence  that........25-2-09  Zvwi‡L  wcjLvbv  †_‡K  721  Uvq

wewWAvi nvmcvZv‡j Avwm| `ievi n‡j ˆmwbK‡`i †bIqvi Rb¨ fall in Kiv nq| Avwg `iev‡i hvB| `ievi PjvKv‡j Rv‡Mv e‡j mevB `vwo‡q hvq Avwg I `vwo‡q hvB| `iev‡i ¸wji kã nq Avwg `ievi †_‡K †ei n‡j †`wL wewWAviiv ¸wj Qzo‡Q|

PW 215 Sepoy-55180 Md. Azmol Hossain has

stated in his evidence that MZ 25/2/09 Avwg `ievi n‡j hvB| 9 NwUKvq `ievi ïi“ nq| Abygvb 9.25 wgt 65140 wmcvnx gvBb A¯¿ nv‡Z `iev‡i cÖ‡ek K‡i| DDG Avt evix wmcvnx gvBb‡K wbi¯¿ K‡i| mK‡j ÒRv‡MvÓ e‡j `vwo‡q hvq| A‡bK BDR m`m¨

`ievi nj Z¨vM K‡i| Avwg `ievi †_‡K †ei nB I ¸wji kã ï‡b ˆmwbK jvB‡b P‡j hvB|

PW 223 Havildar-35369 Md. Habibur

Rahman  has stated in his evidence that 25-02-09

Zvwi‡L gv‡V KvR Kwi| Abygvb 9 Uvq `ievi ïi“ nq| 9-15 wgt wmcvnx gvBb A¯¿ nv‡Z `iev‡i cÖ‡ek K‡i I wWwR Gi cÖwZ A¯¿ ZvK Ki‡j wWwWwR Avt evix mn A‡b‡K Zv‡K wbqš¿b K‡i| wewWAvi m`m¨iv Rv‡Mv e‡j wPrKvi K‡i| wWwR Gi Av‡`k Agvb¨ K‡i JCO-

5439 bv‡qK my‡e`vi Kwei, 5515 Avjx AvKei, 5523 Aveyj Lv‡qi, 4782 Avt evix, 78584 wmcvnx wicb Avn‡¤§` Ab¨vb¨‡ i

m‡½ `ievi nj Z¨vM K‡i| 

PW 278 JCO Naib Subedar-4445 Bidut Mitro

has stated in his evidence that MZ 25/2/09 Zvs mKv‡j Avwg wWwR g‡nv`‡qi `iev‡i Dcw¯ Z’ n‡q `ievi n‡ji `w¶b w`‡K 3bs

mvwii gvSvgvwS †RwmI‡`i emvi ¯’v‡b ewm| mKvj Abygvb 9.00 NwUKvi mgq wWwR g‡nv`q `ievi n‡j Avmb MÖnb K‡ib| Zvici AvbyôvwbKZv †k‡l `ievi Avi¤¢ nq| wWwR g‡nv`‡qi e³e¨ Pj Kvwjb mg‡q `ievi n‡ji wcQ‡bi w`‡K `iRv w`‡q 13 ivB‡dj e¨vUvwjq‡bi wmcvnx gvBb mk¯¿ Ae¯ v’ q `ievi n‡j cÖ‡ek K‡i wWwR g‡nv`‡qi w`‡K †÷R G A¯¿ ZvK K‡i a‡i| Zvi wc‡Q wc‡Q 44 ivB‡dj e¨vUvwjq‡bi wmcvnx KvRj Avjx mk¯¿ Ae¯ v’ q `ievi n‡j cÖ‡ek

K‡i| H mgq K‡qKRb Awdmvi gvBb‡K a‡i wbi¯¿ K‡i| wmcvnx KvRj Avjx H mgq `ievi †_‡K †ei n‡q hvq| †m mgq `iev‡i

Dcw¯ Z’ wKQz msL¨K ˆmwbK m‡Rv‡i wPrKvi w`‡q D‡V `vwo‡q hvq| wKQz ˆmwbK Rv‡Mv e‡j wPrKvi †`q| ZLb ` ev‡i Dcw¯ Z’ wewfbœ

c`exi ˆmwbKiv D‡V `uvwo‡q hvq| Zviv `ievi nj Z¨vM Ki‡Z D`¨Z

n‡j wWwR g‡nv`q gvB‡K Av‡`k K‡ib mevB‡K em‡Z e‡jb| Avcbv‡`i me K_v ïb‡ev| ZLb `iev‡i Dcw¯ Z’ ˆmwbKiv `iRv w`‡q

†h w`‡K cv‡i P‡j †h‡Z _v‡K|

PW 280 DAD Md. Matiur Rahman, Cox’s

Bazar has stated in his evidence that MZ 25-2-09 Zvs

ZrKvjxY 24 ivB‡dj e¨vUvwjq‡b Kg©iZ _vKve¯ v’ q mKvj 6.20 NwUKvq wWDwU‡Z nvwRi nB Ges AvbygvwbK 8.40 NwUKvq `ievi n‡j hvB| `ievi ïi“ n‡j AvbygvwbK mKvj 9.30 NwUKvi mgq wWwR g‡nv`q e³e¨ ïi“ Ki‡j 13 ivB‡dj e¨vUvwjq‡bi 65141 wmcvnx

gvBbywÏb wWwR g‡nv`‡qi w`‡K A¯¿ ZvK K‡i a‡i| Zvi wcQz wcQz 44

ivB‡dj e¨v‡Uwjq‡bi 63922 wmcvnx KvRj Avjx I mk¯¿ Ae¯ v’ q

`ievi n‡j cÖ‡ek K‡i| K‡qKRb Awdmvi Stage G D‡V ZrKvjxb

wWwR g‡nv`q mn wmcvnx gvBb‡K a‡i †d‡j| BZ¨em‡i wmcvnx KvRj

Avjx `ievi †_‡K †ei n‡q hvq| evB‡i ¸wji kã †kvbv hvq|  

†kvbvi ci `iev‡i Dcw¯ Z’ mKj ch©v‡qi ˆmwbK D‡V `vwo‡q hvq|

ZLb ˆmwbK‡`i ga¨ †_‡K †Kn ÒRv‡Mv Ó e‡j ûsKvi w`‡j wWwR g‡nv`q gvB‡K mevB‡K em‡Z e‡jb Ges e‡jb ÒAvcbv‡`i me K_v Avwg ïb‡evÓ wKš‘ ‰mwbKiv wWwRi K_vq KY©cvZ bv K‡i `ievi nj Z¨vM Ki‡Z ïi“ K‡i| ˆmwbKiv hLb `ievi n‡j wewfbœ `iRv

Rvbvjv w`‡q hvw”Qj ZLb wWwR g‡nv`‡qi mKj AwabvqK‡K wbR wbR BDwb‡U wM‡q ˆmwbK‡`i wbqš¿b Ki‡Z e‡jb| ˆmwbKiv ZLb ax‡i ax‡i `ievi †Q‡i P‡j hvq| `ievi nj cÖvq k~Y¨ n‡q hvq|

PW 412 No. BA-3579 Major Khaled Ahmmed

has stated in his evidence that........25/2/09 †iKW© DBs G

Ro-1 wnmv‡e Kg©iZ wQjvg| eZ©gv‡b iv½vgvwU‡Z Kg©iZ| 25/2/09 mKvj 8 Uvq Awd‡m Avwm| 8.45 wgt SRO Gi m‡½ Rxc †hv‡M

`ievi n‡j †cŠwQ| 2q mvwi‡Z Avwg Avmb Mªnb Kwi| 9 Uvq `ievi

ïi “ nq|  Abygvb 9.30 wgt wmcvnx gvBb ivB‡dj mn †ó‡R D‡V I

wW wR Gi w`‡K GwM‡q hvq| ZLb wWwWwR I K‡qKRb Awdmvi wmcvnx gvBb‡K wbi¯¿ K‡i| wewWAviMb ZLb Rv‡Mv e‡j K‡i

Ges †ewi‡q †h‡Z _v‡K| wW wR mv‡ne mevi K_v ïb‡Z Pvq I bxie

_vK‡Z e‡jb| wWwR mv‡ne `ievi Z¨vM bv Ki‡Z wb‡`©k †`b| Av‡`k

Agvb¨ K‡i mevB `ª“Z `ievi nj Z¨vM K‡i| wW wR Aaxb¯ ‡—`i

wbqš¿‡bi wb‡`©k †`b|

After uttering the word ‘Jago’, the BDR rebels

became very aggressive and made pledges to kill the

army officers making provocative and instigating

speeches/words. 

PW 4 Colonel Mohammad Shamsul Alam

Chowdhury has stated in his evidence

that...........Avwg eZ©gv‡b National Security intelligence G

Kg©iZ MZ 1-2-09 †_‡K 11-3-09 ch©š— Avwg wcjLvbvq 44 e¨vUvwjq‡bi AwabvqK wnmv‡e Kg©iZ wQjvg|..........mKvj mKvj

Abygvb 9 NwUKvq cweÎ †Kvivb †Z‡jvqv‡Zi gva¨‡g 25-2-09 ZvwiL `ievi ïi “ nq| DG mv‡n‡ei `iev‡i e³e¨ cÖ`vb ïi“ K‡ib| wZwb wKQz¶b e³e¨ †`Iqvi GK ch©v‡q Wvj fvZ Kg©myPxi Dc‡i we¯ v—wiZ Av‡jvPbv ïi“ K‡ib| Avwg ZLb Awdmvi‡`i emvi 2q mvwi‡Z 3q †Pqv‡i emv wQjvg| DG g‡nv`q mK‡ji D‡Ï‡k¨ e‡jb †h, Avcbviv

wK H e¨vcv‡i me eyS‡Z †c‡i‡Qb ZLb ˆmwb‡Ki Reve Avkb vyi“c bv nIqvq wZwb cybivq Wvjfv‡Zi Dci we¯ v—wiZ e³e¨ ïi“ K‡ib| GK

ch©v‡q wZwb e‡jb Wvjfv‡Zi D™¢yZ A_© ev jf¨vsk BDR Gi Kj¨v‡b

e¨vq Kiv n‡e| ZLb DG g‡nv`‡qi evg cv‡k¦© n‡Z I `ievi n‡ji `w¶b cye© †Kvbv n‡Z GKRb ˆmwbK A¯¿ wb‡q DG g‡nv` i w`‡K

†`Š‡o Avm‡Z _v‡K| Avwg ZLb PxrKvi K‡i ai ai Ki‡Z Ki‡Z †÷‡Ri w`‡K †`Šwo‡q hvB| mv‡_ mv‡_ knx` K‡Y©j gywRe, K‡Y©j AvwbQ, I K‡Y©j Gjvnx mn Av‡iv A‡b‡K †÷‡R D‡V c‡ob| BwZ g‡a¨ H ˆmwbK DG g‡nv`‡qi gv_vi evgcv‡k¦© ivB‡d‡ji e¨v‡ij jvwM‡q †d‡j‡Q| H †Q‡jUv‡K ZLb †Lve bvifvm g‡b nw”Qj Avwg GwM‡q wM‡q 13 ivB‡d‡ji e¨vUvwjq‡b D³ ˆmwbK gvBb‡K a‡i †dwj

Ges GK SUKvq A‡¯¿i e¨v‡ij wd« K‡i †dwj| †mB gyû‡Z© †÷‡R Dcw¯ Z’ weªt †Rbv‡ij evix (whwb GB NUbvq wbnZ) knx` K‡Y©j AvwbQ, knx` K¨vc‡Ub gvbœvb, knx` j¨vt K‡Y©j Gjvnx mn AviI wKQy

Awdmvi gvBb‡K cvKovI K‡i †÷‡R †d‡j †`q|.......... ZLb

`ievi n‡ji evB‡i 10/12 Rb we¶zä ˆmwbK‡K mm¯¿ Ae¯ v’ q NyivNywi

Ki‡Z †`wL| Avwg Zv‡`i g‡a¨ 44 e¨v‡Uwjq‡bi wmcvnx †mwjg †iRv

( Zvi GK nv‡Z A¯¿ Ab¨ nv‡Z †gMv ‡dvb wQj) wmcvnx Ievq`yj Ges wmcvnx iwdKzj‡K wPb‡Z cvwi| ZLb 5 bs †M‡Ui w`K †_‡K K‡qKRb‡K eªvm dvqvi Ki‡Z Ki‡Z Avgv‡`i w`‡K Avm‡Z †`wL Z_v

Dcw¯ Z’ mK‡jB ‡`Šov †`Šwo ïi“ K‡i Avgv‡K J C O  iv av°v‡Z

_v‡K Avgvi wbKU¯’ J C O  †KvqU©v‡i cÖvPx‡ii cv‡k¦© Avkªq †bB| ZLb Avgiv Ae¯ v’ b †_‡K 10-12 MR `y‡i GKRb ˆmwbK‡K `e ivi

nj j¶ K‡i ¸wj Pvjv‡Z †`wL †m ZLb wPrKvi K‡i e‡j Avgiv Awdmvi‡`i PvB Zviv Kv‡iv eÜz bq| me dvqv‡ii j¶ wQj

`ievi nj|......... Avwg wRÁvmv Kwi mgq KZ ZLb e‡j mgq 11.35 wgt ZLb `ievi n‡ji `w¶b cv‡k© cÖPzi BDR ˆmwbK mk¯¿ Ae¯’v‡b

wQj A P C (Armur Personal Carrier) I Pickup|

Mvwo‡Z †c‡Uªvwjs Pj‡Z _v‡K| GKUv Pickup G gvBwKs nq|

Pickup Gi wcQ‡b †jLv wQj m`i| H Pickup I gvBwKs K‡i

ejwQj BDR Gi `vex gvb‡Z n‡e Avwg© Awdmviiv †`‡ki I Zv‡`i kΓ| Avwg© wN‡i †i‡L‡Q Avµgb Ki‡Z cv‡i Ggb K_v gvBwKs nwPQj| †Kvb Awdmvi‡K evP‡Z †`Iqv hv‡e bv| Zviv Qq gvm hy×

Ki‡Z cvi‡e g‡g© ‰mwbK‡`i Av¯^¯’ KiwQj|

PW 10 Major Md. Alamgir Hossain Dewan  has

stated in his evidence that.............25/2/09 mKvj 8-55

wgwb‡U `ievi n‡j †cŠ‡Q Awdmvi‡`i mvwi‡Z ewm| 9 Uvq DG

`ievi ïi “ K‡ib| hLb WvjfvZ m¤ú‡K© A_© wnmv‡ei K_v e‡jb ZLb Stage G GKRb ˆmwbK DG  g‡nv`q eivei A¯¿ ZvK K‡i

Zvi bvg wmcvnx gBb| GKUz c‡i 2 ivDÛ dvqvi nq| ZLb me ˆmwbKiv †ei n‡Z D×Z nq Ges `iRv Rvbvjv fvs‡Z _v‡K| Avwg

Zv‡`i av°vq `iRvi w`‡K †h‡Z eva¨ nB| ZLb `ievi n‡ji Pvi

w`‡K ˆmwbKiv ¸jv¸wj Ki‡Q| 10/12 Rb mk¯¿ ‰mwbK dvqvi Ki‡Z

Ki‡Z GwM‡q Av‡m| Zv‡`i g‡a¨ wmcvnx gwZb, wmcvnx wg›Uz †kL, wmcvnx Kvgvj †gvj−v, wmcvnx mvB`yj Bmjvg mK‡j 44 e¨vUvwjqv‡bi Avwg Zv‡`i wPb‡Z cvwi| Gi ci my‡e`vi †ejv‡qZ Avgv‡K av°v w`‡q e‡j m¨vi Avcwb P‡j hvb|...........ZLb 1021 Uv †e‡R †M‡Q|

ZLb  mg¯—  ˆmwbK‡`i  nv‡Z  A¯¿  †`wL  I  Zviv  †Mvjv¸wj  Ki‡Q †`wL|.........Abygvb 11 Uvi w`‡K Avgv‡`i mKj‡K †KvqvUvi Mv‡W©

wb‡q hvq| wmcvnx gwRei e‡j cv‡R‡iv Mvox‡Z DVvi gRv eyS‡e| wmcvnx gwRei mkª¯¿ wQj| †KvqvU©vi Mv‡W© ïb‡Z cvB I †`L‡Z cvB me wKQy GKRb mv‡R©›U I wKQz ‰mwbK ejv ewj Ki‡Q `ievi n‡ me Awdmvi‡`i  nZ¨v  Kiv  n‡q‡Q  wewfbœ  BDwbU Mobile  K‡i  e‡j

GLvbKvi  me  Awdmvi‡`i  nZ¨v  K‡iwQ  †ZvgivI  ‡Zvgv‡`i Awdmvi‡`i nZ¨v Ki|

PW 16 Md. Arifur Rahman Akash has stated in

his  evidence  that..........Avwg  MZ  25/02/09  Zvwi‡L  Avwg †UBjvwis k‡c Kv‡R wb‡qvwRZ wQjvg|...........Abygvb 9-25 †_‡K

9-30 wgt `ievi n‡ji w`K †_‡K 2/1 ivDÛ ¸wji kã ïwb `ievi

nj †_‡K| ZLb Avwg †`vKvb †_‡K †ei n‡q cwðg cv‡k¦© eviv›`v

†`L‡Z cvB wewWAvi Gi †jvKRb `ievi n‡ji w`K †_‡K †ei n‡q

PZzw`©‡K QyUvQywU Ki‡Q| Hmgq m`i e¨vUvwjq‡b cye© `w¶Y †Kv‡Y M¨v‡i‡Ri mvg‡b nvwej`vi ZwiKzj, wmcvnx Avwgbyi ingvb `vwo‡q

wQ‡jb| Hmgq `ievi nj †_‡K Avmv †gRi AvQv` m`i e¨vUvwjq‡bi Awd‡mi mvg‡b evMv‡bi Kv‡Q Avm‡j nvwej`vi †gRi ZwiKzj e‡j H

GK KzËvi ev”Pv Av‡m ai| wmcvnx Avwgbyi ingvb I AviI GKRb

AcwiwPZ ˆmwbK †gRi AvQv‡`i `yB cv‡k 2Rb a‡i iv‡L| nvwej` i

ZwiKzj Zvi †Kvg‡ii †eë Ly‡j †gRi AvQv‡`i bv‡K gy‡Ly ‡ eK wc‡V

gvi‡Z _v‡K| †gRi AvQv` Zv‡K av°v †g‡i m`i e¨vUvwjq‡bi 2q

Zjvq wm/I mv‡n‡ei Awd‡m Xz‡K| wmcvnx Avwgbyi wcQy wcQy hvq| Hmgq nvwej`vi ZwiKzj jvB‡bi bx‡P †h‡Z _v‡K I wPrKvi K‡i

ej‡Z _v‡K †Kvb wewWAvi Gi †jvK Lvwj nv‡Z _v‡K‡e bv mevB A¯¿

wb‡q `ievi n‡j hv‡e I Avwg© Awdmvi †`LvgvÎ ¸wj Ki‡e g‡g©

wb‡`©k †`q|.......... nvwej`vi †ejv‡qZ e‡j †gRi AvQv‡`i ev”Pv‡K

†ei Ki| KzËvi ev”Pv‡K gvi kvjv †hb †Kvbfv‡e evP‡Z bv cv‡i|

Z_v bv‡qK AvQv`‡K nvwej`vi †ejv‡qZ e‡j Pj kvjv‡K gvi‡ev GB

e‡j Zviv m`i e¨vUvwjq‡b Xz‡K|

PW20 Major Kamrul Hasan has stated in his

evidence that..........MZ 25/2/09 wewWAvi Gi gnvcwiPvj‡Ki `ievi wQj| Avwg `iev‡i †hvM`vb Kwi| Awdmvi‡`i 1g mvwi‡Z

gvS eive‡i e‡mwQjvg| wWwR mKvj 9Uvq `ievi ïi“ K‡ib| mKvj

9-26 wgwb‡U 13 e¨vUvwjq‡bi wmcvnx gvBb `ievi n‡j mk¯¿ cÖ‡ek

K‡i wWwR Gi w`‡K A¯¿ ZvK K‡i a‡i| ZLb mKj ˆmwbK `vwo‡q hvq| wWwWwR wmcvnx gvB‡bi A¯¿ wb‡q Zv‡K wbi¯¿ K‡i| ZLb `ievi n‡ji wfZi †_‡K 'Rv‡Mv' e‡j kã K‡i| ZLb mevB‡K wWwR e‡jb Avcbviv mK‡j emyb Avwg mK‡ji K_v ïb‡ev| wewWAvi m`m¨iv `ievi nj Z¨vM Ki‡Z _v‡K| wWwR mevB‡K `ievi nj Z¨vM Ki‡Z wb‡la K‡i| Zvic‡iI wewWAvi m`m¨iv `ievi nj Z¨vM Ki‡Z _v‡K| `iRv Rvbvjv †fs‡M Zviv †ei n‡Z _v‡K| mKj Awdmvi‡`i wbqš¿Y Ki‡Z e‡jb| c‡i GB Av‡`‡ki ci Avwg `ievi n‡ji gvS

eivei P‡j Avwm| evB‡i ¸wji ïb‡Z cvB|............Avwg

†K›`ªxq gmwR‡`i Kv‡Q P‡j Avwm| GKRb wewWAvi m`m¨ Avgv‡K ai

ai e‡j GwM‡q Av‡m| bv‡qK nvwee Avgv‡K D×vi K‡i Awdmvm© evm¯’vb GjvKvq 10bs wewìs‡q Av‡b| 2q Zjvq Ae¯ v’ bKvix K‡Y©j

mvB` Avgv‡K wRÁvmv K‡i wK n‡q‡Q| Avwg †Mvjv¸wji K_v ewj| Avwg ZLb Zvi cv‡k Avgvi evmvq P‡j Avwm| Avgvi evmv 4_© Zjvq| bv‡qK nvwee Avgv‡K bxP ch©š— †cŠ‡Q †`q| Avwg evoxi Qv‡`

D‡V †`wL mk¯¿ wewWAvi-iv Ae¯’vb wb‡”Q| bx‡P †b‡g G‡m †ej wUc‡j Avgvi Kv‡Ri eyqv `iRv Ly‡j †`q| evmvq Amy¯’ ¯K ¿x‡ NUbv ewj| c‡i Avwg BDwbdg© Ly‡j c¨v›U kvU© cwi| cv‡k¦©i em vvq kã I AvZ©bv`  ïb‡Z  cvB|  ev_i“‡gi  Dci  false  ceiling-G DwV|.............25/2 iv‡Z 3Uvi c‡i ¯¿xi Kv‡Q Rvb‡Z cvwi gvbbxq

¯^ivóªgš¿x G‡mwQ‡jb Avgvi ¯¿x‡K D×v‡ii Rb¨| Avgvi ¯¿x v—b

m¤¢ev wQ‡jb| wZwb Avgv‡K Qvov hvq bvB|............¯^ivóªgš¿x P‡j

hvIqvi c‡i Avgvi evmv jyUZivR K‡i| 26/2 †fv‡i gvB‡K wewfbœ †Nvlbv ïwb| mKvj 11Uvq ¸wji kã ïb‡Z cvB| we‡Kj 3Uvq Avgvi

`iRvq jvw_i kã cvB| we‡`ªvnxiv Avgvi ¯¿x I ev”Pv‡`i wb‡q hvIqvi

†Póv K‡i| c‡i K‡Y©j mvB`‡K Zviv Av‡b| wZwb Avgvi ¯¿x‡K evmv †_‡K †ei n‡Z e‡j| Avwg evmvq AvwQ †R‡b wmcvnx gvRnvi mn 4/5 Rb we‡`ªvnx Avgvi w`‡K A¯¿ ZvK K‡i GwM‡q Av‡m| Avwg Zv‡`i ¸wj bv Ki‡Z Aby‡iva Kwi| wmcvnx gvRnvi mn mK‡j Avg‡K v A‡¯¿i

gy‡L †ei K‡i Av‡b  |gvRnv‡ii mv‡_ wmcvnx gvmy`, wmcvnx wRqvDj, wmcvnx bRi“j wQj| Avgv‡K gvi‡Z gvi‡Z bvwg‡q Av‡b| evmvi

mvg‡b  GKwU Pickup  †`wL|  wmcvnx  gvRnvi  e‡jb  byZb  wWwR †ZŠwn` mv‡n‡ei Av‡`k KvD‡K gviv hv‡e bv †MBU ch©š— †cŠwQ‡q

w`‡Z n‡e|

PW21  Syed  Monirul  Alam  has  stated  in  his

evidence that...........25/02/09 Zvwi‡L mKvj 8 NwUKvq mKj Awdmvi I †dvm©mn `ievi wQj| Avwg H `iev‡i AskMÖn‡bi Rb¨ 7Uvq evmv †_‡K †ei n‡q 7-20 wgt g‡a¨ 24 e¨vUvwjqb A‡c¶v

Kwi| †gRi gwgb‡K †dvb K‡i Rvb‡Z cvB `iev‡ii mgq 9Uv Kiv

n‡q‡Q| 8 1  Uvq †gRi gwgb, Avwg Ges †gRi gvKmygyj nvwKg mn

2

GK‡Î `iev‡i hvB| `ievi n‡ji DËiw`‡K `w¶YgyLx 3 mvwi †Pqvi mvRv‡bv wQj| Z…Zxq mvwii †kl cÖv‡š— cwðg w`‡K ewmm |K vj 9Uvq wWwR `iev‡i Av‡mb|............Avwg Kvu‡Pi M−vm w`‡  qevB‡i ZvwK‡q

†`wL wewWAvi Gi we‡`ªvnx m`m¨iv A¯¿ nv‡Z `ievi n‡ji w`‡K GwM‡q Avm‡Q I dvuKv ¸wj Ki‡Q| wWwR‡K Ab¨ Awdmviiv †NivI K‡i iv‡L|........ `ievi n‡ji Pviw`‡K cÖPÛ †Mvjv¸wj ïi“ nq|

Avwg AvZ¥i¶v‡_© Iqvki“‡g cÖ‡ek Kwi| Avwg I †gRi gvKmygyyj †ewm‡bi bx‡P AvkÖq †bB| 10/12 Rb m`m¨ A¯¿ nv‡Z `ievi n‡j cÖ‡ek K‡i I Awdmvi‡`i MvjvMvwj K‡i|..............Avwg eyS‡Z cvwi

wewWAvi m`m¨iv Awdmvi‡`i †g‡i †dj‡Q| Avgvi cv‡k †gRi gvKmygyj nvwKg wQ‡jb| KQy c‡i we‡`ªvnx wewWAvi Iqvk i“‡g cÖ‡ek K‡i I e‡j "wfZ‡i †Kvb KzËvi ev”Pv AvQ bvwK|" we‡`ª nxiv †gRi gvKmygyj nvwKg‡K †`L‡Z cvq I we‡`ªvnxiv Zv‡K ¸wj K‡i I wZwb hLgcÖvß nb I co‡Z _v‡K| GKch©v‡q wZwb c‡o hvb| wZwb we‡`ªvnx‡`i e‡jb Zvi Mv‡q ¸wj †j‡M‡Q Zv‡K †hb nvmcvZv‡j † Iqv

nq| we‡`ªvnxiv ZLb e‡j KzËvi ev”Pv‡K AvRxe‡bi gZ nmwcUv‡j cvVv| wmcvnxiv Zv‡K j¶¨ K‡i cyYivq ¸wj Ki‡j wZwb †mLv‡bB gviv hvb| Avwg Zvi kixi †_‡K S‡i Avmv Kcv‡j jvwM‡q ï‡q

cwo givi fvb K‡i| we‡`ªvnx‡`i g‡a¨ GKRb e‡j D‡V wRqv, ivwReyj

Pj KzËvi ev”Pviv gviv †M‡Q|

PW 33 Lieutenant Colonel Md. Reazul Karim has

stated in his evidence that...........25-2-09 NUbvi ZvwiL|

Avwg wewWAvi m`i `߇i  Kg©iZ wQjvg| mKvj 6 Uvq †K›`ªxq †KvqvU©vi Mv‡W©i wWDwU‡Z wQjvg| Abygvb mKvj 8.50 wgt duty officer  Gi i“‡g emv wQjvg| `iRv w`‡q evB‡q ZvwK‡q †`wL 20/25 Rb wewWAvi m`m¨ Gw`K Iw`K ZvKv‡”Q| Zv‡`i †`‡L m‡›`n

nIqvq Zv‡`i Kv‡Q hvB I P¨v‡jÄ K‡i ewj †Zvgiv wK KiQ I MvW©

KgvÛv‡ii D‡Ï‡k¨ ewj Giv Kviv wKfv‡e Avmj ? m‡½ m‡½ ˆmwbKMb

Avgvi D‡Ï‡k¨ KzËvi ev”Pv ïqv‡ii ev”Pv Avwg© Awdmvi e‡j Svwc‡q

c‡o Avgv‡K wKj Nywl jvw_ gv‡i| GB mgq ZvwK‡q †`wL A¯¿vMv‡ii MvW©Mb bxi‡e `vwo‡q Av‡Q| Zviv Avgv‡K ‡Ps `yjv K‡i a‡i wb‡q iwk

I †PBb w`‡q nvZcv †e‡a †d‡j Mjv wU‡c nZ¨vi †Póv K‡i| †KD

†KD e‡j †eq‡bU LywP‡q †g‡i †dj| Zviv Avgvi nvZ Nwo †gvevBj

†dvb wQwb‡q †bq| Avgv‡K †e‡a †i‡L evwni †_‡K `iRv eÜ K‡i †`q|............25/2/2009 ivwÎ 9 Uvq mk¯¿ ˆmwbKMb Avgvi `iRvi evB‡i G‡m PxrKvi K‡i e‡j KzËvi ev”Pv‡K †ei K‡i eªvk dvqvi Ki|

Zviv Avgv‡K evB‡i wb‡q hvq Ges i“‡gi wfZ‡i †bq †mB i“‡g

†`wL i“gwU bvix I wkï‡Z fwZ©| Avwg Zv‡`i Kv‡Q cÖvb wf¶v PvB|

Zviv i“‡g wb‡q hvq|

PW 41 Sree Rabindra Kumar Pal has stated in his

evidence  that..........25-2-09  Zvwi‡L  `iev‡i  Avwg  Dcw¯ Z’

wQjvg| `ievi n‡j GKRb ‰mwbK A¯¿ wb‡q cÖ‡ek Kivq wek„sLjvi

m„wó nq| `ievi n‡j †MU w`‡q †ei n‡q 44 e¨vUvwjq‡bi ˆmwbK

jvB‡bi w`‡K hvB| c‡_i g‡a¨ 44 e¨vUvwjq‡bi wmcvnx nvwdRyi j¨vt

bvt  gyQv  wgqv,  wmcvnx  AvQv`y¾vgvb  wmcvnx  Avwidzj  mn  A‡bK wewWAvi m`m¨ fire Ki‡Z Ki‡Z `ievi n‡ji w`‡K hvq| wewWAvi

G Avwg© ivL‡ev bv ej‡Z ej‡Z fir K‡i| 

PW 48 Major Isteaque Ahmed Khan has stated

in his evidence that............2009 mv‡j 25/2 ZvwiL mKvj

‡cŠ‡b 9 Uvq `ievi n‡j Dcw¯ Z’ nB| 9 Uvq `ievi ïi“ nq| mKvj

9 1  Uvq wKQz ˆmwbK wWwW Gi Kv‡Q Av‡mb| G‡`i g‡a¨ wmcvnx

2

gvBb A¯¿ ZvK K‡i KvRj Zvi wcQ‡b _v‡K| Dcw¯ Z’ Awdmviiv wmcvnx gvBb‡K wbi¯¿ K‡i| KvRj †ei n‡q hvq| 2 ivDÛ ¸wji kã

ïwb|.............‰mwbK  kvnRvnvb  we‡`ªv‡n  †hvM`v‡bi Rb¨  mKj‡K

AvneŸvb K‡i †dv‡b| 4 Zvjv †_‡K †`wL j¨vÝ bv‡qK BKivg, gvB‡K †Nvlbv  K‡i  wWwR‡K  gviv  n‡q‡Q  me  Awdmvi‡K  gviv  n‡e|  †m mKj‡K we‡`ªv‡n †hvM`v‡bi K_v e‡j|................c‡ii w`b 26/2

mKvj 6 1 Uvq Avwg H evmv †_‡K †ei n‡q hvB| 24 e¨vUvwjq‡bi

2

cv‡k †_‡K wWwR evs‡jvi Kv‡Q hvB| ZLb GKRb ˆmwbK Avgv‡K e‡j ZzB Awdmvi bv ? Avwg ewj Avwg †gRi BmwZqvK|

PW  52  Al  Mahmud  Kabir  has  stated  in  his

evidence that............MZ 25-2-09 9Uvq `ievi n‡j wQjvg|

Avwg mvDÛ wm‡óg Acv‡iU‡ii `vqx‡Z¡ wQjvg| mKvj 9 Uv 20-25 wgt wmcvnx gvBb A¯¿ mn wWwR Gi w`‡K ZvK K‡i Ab¨vb¨ Awdmv‡iiv

Zv‡K wbi¯¿ K‡i| wmcvnx KvRj A¯¿ mn Xy‡K I gvBb aivcoq v †m

†ei n‡q hvq| `ievi n‡ji evB‡i ¸wji kã nq|.............†mwjg

†iRvi nv‡Z n¨vÛ gvBK wQj| †m D³ gvBK w`‡q Awdmvi‡`i †ei nIqvi wb‡`©k †`q|...............c‡i nvwej`vi knx`yj I Zvi mv‡_

wmcvnx kvgxg I wmcvnx AveyeKi‡K A¯¿ mn †`wL Zvnviv ej‡ZwQj A‡bK Awdmvi fin sh K‡iwQ| GB e‡j Zviv Dj−vm cÖKvk K‡i|

PW 53 Md. Shafiquzzaman  has stated in his

evidence that.........MZ 25-2-09 Avwg wcjLvbvq ‰mwbK †g‡Q wQjvg| 91  Uvq `ievi n‡j ¸wji kã cvB| 10-45 wgt †jt Kt

2

Av‡bvqvi Avgvi ABC ‡g‡Q c‡i A¯¿avix wewWAvi m`m¨iv Zv‡K Zz‡j wb‡h hvq| H w`b mKvj †_‡K we‡Kj ch©š— Avwg hv‡`i mk¯¿ Ae¯ v’ q †`wL Zviv n‡jv bv‡qK evix wmcvnx gvgybyi iwk`,wmcvnx dvi“K  û‡mb,  wmcvnx  †Mvjvg  bex  wmcvnx  †gvqv‡¾g,  GKivgyj, Rvnv½xi, nvwej`vi knx`yj, j¨vt bv‡qK GKivgyj wmcvnx kvnAvjg, wmcvnx †Mvjvc kvnxb wmcvnx Avjgvm, Avt Rwjj, RvKvwiqv Gbvgyj, kwdKzj I wmcvnx bvRgyj wkK`vi‡K Ab¨vb¨ A¯¿avixi mv‡_ †`wL| Zviv ej‡ZwQj wewWAvi G †mbv Awdmvi _vK‡e bv| Zv‡`i A‡bK‡K ¸jv¸wj Ki‡Z †`wL|

PW  87  Md.  Sohel  Rana  has  stated  in  his

evidence that..........25/2/09 mKvj 9.30 wgt Avwg e¨viv‡K

wQjvg| c‡i wKQy wewWAvi m`m¨ PxrKvi K‡i ej‡Z _v‡K jvB‡b hviv Av‡Q mevB bx‡P bvgyb| f‡q bx‡P bvwg| 78113 bv¤^vi wmcvnx ieŸ bx

I 77593 wmcvnx RvwKi‡K mn Ab¨‡`i A¯¿mn D‡ËwRZ †`wL| Zviv fire Ki‡Z Ki‡Z `ievi n‡ji w`‡K hvB‡Z‡Q I ej‡Z‡Q wewWAvi G †mbv Awdmvi _vK‡e bv|

PW 122 Naik-47092 Md. Moklesur Rahman

has stated in his evidence that..........MZ 25/2/09 Avwg

`iev‡i wQjvg| `iev‡i wek„sLjv n‡j Avwg `iev‡ii evB‡i P‡j

hvB| ZLb A‡bK BDR m`m¨‡`i mk¯¿ Ae¯ v’ q D‡ËwRZ †`wL| Zviv

¸wj Ki‡Z Ki‡Z `ievi n‡ji w`‡K Av‡m Zv‡`i g‡a¨ 73529 wmcvnx wRqvDj nK, 75223 wmcvnx kvnxb Ggivb, 76539 wmcvnx iv‡mj,  76692 wmcvnx  Igi dvi“K‡K wPb‡Z  cvwi| Zviv e‡j

BDR G †mbv Awdmvi _vK‡ebv| Zv‡`i †hLv‡b cvIqv hv‡e ¸wj K‡i †kl K‡i †`Iqv n‡e|

PW 126 Sepoy-63121 Md. Rokonuzzaman has

stated in his evidence that...........25/2/09 Avwg `ievi n‡j

wQjvg| `iev‡i GK ch©v‡q 65140 wmcvnx gvBb A¯¿mn `iev‡i cÖ‡ek K‡i| ZLb mK‡j `vwo‡q hvq| wWwR mKj‡K em‡Z e‡jb| A‡b‡K `ievi Z¨vM K‡i| Avwg `ievi nj †_‡K †ei n‡q e¨vUvwjq‡b

Avwm I jvB‡b _vwK| ZLb A‡bK‡K A¯¿ I †Mvjvevi“` wb‡Z †`wL Zv‡`i g‡a¨ 65058 Avt evkvi, 67692 wmcvnx dwi`, 69760 wmivRyj, 69776 wmcvnx kvwggyj nK, 74415 wmMbvjg¨vb †evinvb‡K A¯¿mn fire Ki‡Z Ki‡Z `ievi n‡ji w`‡K †h‡Z †`wL|

Zviv e‡j BDR G †mbv Awdmvi _vK‡ebv I mevB‡K A¯¿ wb‡Z e‡j|

PW 172 Lance Naik-56766 Pijush Kanti

Sarkar,  has stated in his evidence that 25-2-09 Zvs AvbygvwbK mKvj 8.20 NwUKvi mgq Refered  K…Z ‡ivMx‡`i wb‡q evB‡ii nvmcvZv‡j fwZ©i Rb¨ Avgv‡`i G¨v¤^y‡jÝ wb‡q I ibv †`B| wewfbœ nvmcvZv‡j †ivMx †cŠwQ‡q AvbygvwbK mKvj 9.40 NwUKvi gq 3 bs †MBU w`‡q wcjLvbvq cÖ‡ek Kwi| exi‡kªô gyÝx Avãyi iDd

K‡j‡Ri mvg‡b Avm‡ZB †`wL wKQz msL¨K we‡`ªvnx BDR m`m¨ A¯¿

nv‡Z †K‡gv †MwÄ I dzj c¨v›U civ Ae¯ v’ q Gw`K †mw`K †`Šov‡`Šwo Ki‡Q| miKvix cÖv_wgK ¯‹zj cvi n‡qB †`L‡Z cvB †jt K‡Y©j iv¾vK `ª“Z †e‡M `ievi n‡ji w`K w`‡q nvmcvZv‡ji w`‡K Avm‡Qb| Avwg Ambulance _vwg‡q Zv‡K DVvB| Zvi Kv‡Q Rvb‡Z cvwi AvbygvwbK mKvj 9.30 NwUKvi mgq A¯¿avix we‡`ªvnxiv `ievi n‡j Xy‡K dvqvi Ki‡Q| Zv‡K nvmcvZv‡j bvwg‡q Avwg Avv gi wWDwU

i“‡g P‡j hvB| †mLvb †_‡K cÖPzi ¸wji kã ïb‡Z cvB| weKvj

Abygvb 5.00 Uvi w`‡K j¨vt bv‡qK mnKvix †iRvDj Kwig nvmcvZv‡j G‡m A¯¿ wb‡q †mbv Awdmvi‡`i gvivi Rb¨ LyR‡Z _v‡K|

†m e‡j †Kvb †mbv Awdmvi‡`i evP‡Z †`qv n‡e bv| †mbv Awdmviiv

Avm‡j Avgv‡`i Lei w`ev|

PW 173 Naik-51139 Md. Monir Hossain  has

stated in his evidence that 25/2/09 Zvs †Kvb wWDwU bv _vKvq ˆmwbK jvB‡bB A‡c¶v KiwQjvg| †ejv AvbygvwbK 9.25 NwUKvi mgq †Mvm‡ji Rb¨ †Mvmj Lvbvq hvB| nUvr `ievi n‡ji w`‡K †Mvjv¸wji kã ïb‡Z cvB| H Ae¯ v’ q eviv›`vq wM‡q †`wL `ievi nj

†_‡K A‡bK wewWAvi †Rvqvb †`Šov‡`Šwo K‡i jvB‡bi w`‡K Avm‡Q| wKQz †jvK gy‡Lvm cov G‡jvcv_vwi †Mvjv¸wj Ki‡Q Ges –‡ gL ej‡Q

†K †Kv_vq Av‡Qv, bx‡P bv‡gv A¯¿ †Mvjv evi“` †bI Avwg©iv wewWAvi †g‡i †dj‡Q| ZLb Avwg †Mvmj Lvbvq wM‡q †Mvmj K‡i ˆmwbK jvB‡bB A‡c¶v Kwi| †ejv Abygvb 10.30 NwUKvi mgq m`i ivB‡dj e¨vUvwjq‡bi †K›`ªxq Avi wc bs- 53824 j¨vt bv‡qK †gvt

gymv †gvjv−, 72087 wmcvnx mwdKzj Bmjvg 65857 wmcvnx †jvKgvb‡`i A¯¿ mn jvB‡bi wfZi cÖ‡ek Ki‡Z †`wL| Gi wKQz¶b

c‡i †ejv Abygvb 12.15 NwUKvi mgq Avi wc jvB‡bi mvg‡b Avg evMv‡bi bx‡P 10/15 Rb we‡`ªvnx wewWAvi A¯¿ I ‡Mvjvevi“` mn †Nviv-†div Ki‡Z †`wL| Zv‡`i g‡a¨ †K›`ªxq Avi wc bs- 49120

bv‡qK kwidzj Bmjvg, 52781 j¨vt bvt nvweeyj¬vn evnvi, 68779 wmcvnx Avkivdzj, 63479 wmcvnx nvq`vi Avjx, 51876 j¨vt bvt †Mvjvg, 52194 Avnv`y¾vgvb I 52270 j¨vt bvt mvBdzj Bmjvg‡K ‰mwbK jvB‡bi mvg‡b mk¯¿ Ae¯ v’ q †Nviv‡div Ki‡Z †`‡LwQ|  G wKQz¶b ci †ejv 12.30 NwUKvq GKUz c‡i 62742 wmcvnx Aveyj Kvjvg AvRv` †K A¯¿ I †Mvjvevi“` mn we‡`ªvnx ˆmwbK‡`i mv‡_

DmKvbx g~jK e³e¨ w`‡Z †`wL †m e‡j‡Q Avgiv Avwg© Awdmvi‡`i nZ¨v K‡iwQ| Zv‡`i‡K †Kn Ly‡R cv‡e bv| †Zvgiv Avgv‡i ` m‡½ _v‡Kv Ges Avwg© Awdmvi‡`i hv‡K †hLv‡b cv‡e Zv‡K †mLv‡bB ¸wj K‡i nZ¨v K‡iv|

PW 240 Sepoy-63684 Md. Shahdat Hossain

has stated in his evidence that MZ 25/2/09 Zvwi‡L wbR

jvB‡b Ae¯ v’ b Kwi| 9-30 wgt fire ïwb| Awdm wewìs Gi mvg‡b

†PŠiv¯ v—| 77009 wmcvnx wgjb, 77873 wmcvnx †di‡`Šm mn A‡bK‡K mk¯¿ Ae¯ v’ q †`wL ¸wj Ki‡Z| Zviv e‡j BDR G

Army _vK‡e bv| m`i K¨vw›U‡bi mvg‡b A‡bK mk¯¿ BDR †`wL|

On the fateful day of the occurrence, the BDR

rebels following the criminal conspiracy together with

common intention and common object not only killed

the army officers in different places of the Pilkhana,

they also carried out severe and butcherly persecutions

and misbehaviours on the wives, family members and

maid servants of the army officers. In order to

understand the gravity of the offences committed by

the BDR rebels, I am going to refer some important

evidence adduced by the prosecution witnesses who

saw the scenario of the persecutions and became

affected and persecuted by the BDR rebels since they

were victims and they were the eye witnesses of the occurrences. Side by side, I would like to refer some confessional statements given by some of the accused

who actively participated in the commission of crimes

and confessed to the offences by giving confessional

statements vividly and elaborately.   

PW 263 Mrs. Munmun Akther (wife of

Shaheed Lieutenant Colonel Shamsul Azam  has

stated in her evidence that.........25/2/09 Zvs BDR  mßvn

Dcj‡¶¨ `ievi n‡j wgwUs _v‡K| H wgwUs‡q hvIqvi Rb¨ Avgvi

¯^vgx mKvj Abygvb 8.00 Uvi w`‡K bv¯Ív K‡i †ei nb| c‡Avwg Avgvi evmvq Avgvi †gngvb I ev”Pv‡K wb‡q bv¯Ív mviwQjvg| AvbygvwbK mKvj 9.15-9.30 Uvi mgq †ek wKQz ¸wji AvIqvR cvB Ges µgk ¸wji AvIqvR evowQj|................Abygvb ‡ejv 11.00

Uvi w`‡K 7-10 Rb ˆmwbK G‡m Avgv‡`i `iRvq jvw_ gviwQj| Ges ejwQj Ò `iRv ‡Lvj bvB‡j ¸wj Ki‡evÓ Avwg f‡q fxZ n‡q `iRv Ly‡j †`B| mv‡_ mv‡_ Zviv gvigyLx n‡q N‡i XyK‡j Ges ww efbœ i“g I wewfbœ RvqMvq Zviv wK †hb LyRwQj| Avwg Zv‡`i‡K Dnvi Kvib wRÁvmv Ki‡j Zviv e‡j Òm¨vi †Kv_vqÓ| ZLb Avwg ewj Avcbv‡`i m¨vi `ievi n‡j wgwUs‡q Av‡Q| Dˇi e‡jb Zvn‡j m¨vi fvjB Av‡Q| Zviv hvevi mgq e‡j hvq m¨vi Avm‡j Avgv‡`i ej‡eb| G

ci AvbygvwbK †ejv 12.00 Uvi w`‡K Avgv‡`i bxPZjvq 2wU family

i †Q‡j †g‡qiv Avgvi evmvq Avkªq †bq| Avwg mevB‡K wb‡q f‡q Romo n‡q _vwK| AZtci Avevi GK`j ˆmwbK Avgv‡`i N‡i Av‡m GKB fv‡e Zj¬vkx Pvjvq I hvevi mgq GK Avãyj¬vn Avj gvgyb bv‡g GK ˆmwbK Avgvi fv‡Mœi †eŠ cwc Gi e¨vM †_‡K 10,000/- Uv v I †gvevBj †dvb wb‡q hvq| c‡i Giv P‡j ‡M‡j wKQz¶b c‡i ˆmwbKiv GKB fv‡e evmvq Av‡m Ges evmv Zj−kx K‡i I hvevi mgq wWwRUvj K¨v‡giv I N‡i _vKv †gvevBj wb‡q hvq| Avwg gv_v DPz K‡i

†`L‡Z cvB ˆmwbKiv Awdmvi‡`i Mvox †cvov‡”Qb| AZtci Av‡iK

MÖ“c ˆmwbK Avgv‡`i evmvq A¯¿ I †MÖ‡bW mn Av‡m I bvwP‡q bvwP‡q Avgv‡`i fq †`Lvw”Qj| Zv‡`i fq¼i i“c wQj|

PW 277 Lance Naik-51963 Md. Rafiqul Islam

Feroz  has stated in his evidence that 25/2/09 Zvs

AvbygvwbK †ejv 8.00 NwUKvi mgq Ab¨vb¨ m`‡m¨i mv‡_ AvwgI `ievi n‡j nvwRi nB| `ievi PjvKvjxb DG g‡nv`‡qi e³‡e¨i

GK chv©‡q bs 65140 wmcvnx  †gvt gvBb DwÏb  13 ivB‡dj e¨vUwjqvb mk¯¿ Ae¯ v’ q `ievi n‡j cÖ‡ek K‡i| ZLb `ievi n‡j

wek„sjv †`Lv †`q Ges AwaKvsk BDR m`m¨ DG g‡nv`‡qi Av‡`k

Agvb¨ K‡i `ievi Z¨vM Ki‡Z _v‡K| DG g‡nv`q KZ…©K Av‡`k cÖvß

n‡q Avwg `ievi nj †_‡K †ei n‡q wbR BDwbU 13 ivB‡dj e¨vUvwjq‡b hvB| jvB‡b hvIqvi mgq 53027 j¨vt bvt †gvt nvi“byi

ikx`, 13 ivB‡dj e¨vUvwjqb, bs 54280 j¨vt bvt †gvt Avjx

AvKei, GKB e¨vUvwjqvb, bs 78553 wmcvnx †gvt iv‡mj mI`vMi

14 ivB‡dj e¨v‡Uwjqvb, bs- 69038 wmcvnx †gvt dinv` †nv‡mb

37 ivB‡dj e¨vUvwjqb, bs 68398 wmcvnx †gvt kwidzj Bmjvg 8

ivB‡dj e¨vUvwjqb, bs- 76116 wmcvnx †gvt mwdKzj Bmjvg, 8 ivB‡j e¨vUvwjqb, bs 76798 wmcvnx †gvt Avãyj Lv‡jK 8 ivB‡d e¨vUvwjqvb Ges bs 66408 wmcvnx KvDmvi Avng`, 8 ivB‡dj e¨vUvwjqb †K BDwbU GjvKvq A¯¿mn D‡ËwRZ fv‡e †Nviv‡div Ki‡Z †`wL| Zviv mK‡jB Army Officer †`i †LvRv‡LvwR KiwQj

Ges ejwQj BDR G Army Officer _vK‡e bv| hv‡K †hLv‡b

cvIqv hv‡e †mLv‡bB †g‡i †djv n‡e|

 PW 328 Mr. Md. Jahangir Kabir Nanok MP

has stated in his evidence that MZ 25/2/09 ZvwiL Abygvb

10 Uvq gš¿Yvj‡q iIqvbv nB| grm fe‡bi Kv‡Q ‡cŠQ‡j †dvb Av‡m

wcjLvbvq ¸jv¸wj Pj‡Q| AviI 2/1 RvqMv †_‡K msev` Av‡m| Zvr¶wbKfv‡e gvbbxq msm` m`m¨ gvbbxq ûBc wgRv© AvRg‡K NUbv AeMZ K‡i hgybvq Avmvi Rb¨  Aby‡iva Kwi| Avwg gvbbxq cÖavbgš¿xi evmfeb hgybvq hvB| hgybvq Xz‡K AvZsK RbK cwiw¯ w’ Z †`wL| gvbbxq cÖavbgš¿x gwš¿ cwil` I RvZxq wmwbqi †bZv‡`i m‡½ Av‡jvPbv K‡ib| †ejv 1Uvq gvbbxq cÖavbgwš¿ Avgv‡K I wgR ©

 


1

AvRg‡K e‡jb †Zvgiv wcjLvbvq wM‡q  BDR Gi m‡½ Av‡jvPbv

K‡i mgvav‡bi †Póv Ki| wK Kiv hvq fve‡Z _vwK| Avgiv wcjLvbv

D‡Ï‡k¨ wmwU K‡jR n‡q iIqvbv Kwi| Avgevjv myBU wgwó i†`vKv‡b †cŠQ‡j cÖPÛ ¸jv¸wji ïwb|...............Avwg I ûBc AvRg

Avgv‡`i †dvb bv¤^vi w`‡q BDR ‡`i GB bv¤^v‡i †hvMv‡hvM Ki‡Z Aby‡iva Kwi |G K ch©v‡q  BDR iv Avgv‡`i j¶¨ K‡i Mywj Qz‡o Avgiv Av‡jvPbvi Rb¨ Aby‡iva Kwi|B DR v Avgv‡`i Ak¬xj

fvlvq MvjvMvwj K‡i| c‡i Avgiv mv`v cZvKv wb‡q mvg‡b G¸‡Z _vwK| BDR iv cybivq Ak¬xj fvlvq MvjvMvwj K‡i| Avgiv †`‡ki ¯^v‡_© cÖavbgwš¿i wb‡`©k ¸i“Z¡cyb© g‡b K‡i GwM‡q hvB| BDR iv e‡j cÖavbgwš¿‡K cvVvb| Avgiv †mbvevwnbxi ‡P‡q kw³kvjx mg¯Í †K›`ª Avgv‡`i c‡¶| me Dwo‡q †`e KvD‡K Qvov n‡e bv|

PW 353 Mrs. Fara Zinnat (wife of Shaheed

Lieutenant Colonel Zahidul Islam) has stated in her

evidence that..........Avgvi m¦vgx †j: K: Rvwn` wewWAvi G Kg i© Z wQ‡jb| 25/2/09 wZwb 8 1/ Uv evmv †_‡K †ei nb| 9-10/15 wgwbU

2


1

†`wL wKQy †Rvqvb `ievi nj †_‡K †ei n‡”Q I ¸wji kã cvB| c‡i m¦vgx‡K †dvb Kwi wewWAvi Gi wfZ‡i MÛ‡Mvj n‡”Q| Abygvb 10 Uvq 10/12 Rb †Rvqvb G‡m Avgvi evmvi `iRv †f‡½ †d‡j| ZLb eªvm dvqv‡ii fq †`Lvq Avwg ZLb `iRv Lywj| Avgv‡`i gvi‡Z gv ‡Z †KvqvUvi Mv‡W© wb‡q hvq| Mv‡W© wM‡q A‡bK fvex‡`i †`wL| 26/2/09 we‡Kj 4 Uvq Avwg †ei n‡q Avwm| hviv gviai K‡i Zv‡`i g‡a¨ nvwej`vi bvwQi, wmcvnx wRqvDi ingvb, wmcvnx igRvb, Svoy`vi AvjgMxi, Aveyj û‡mb, Avjg û‡mb, Kvgvj û‡mb, Gg`v`yj nK AvBbyj, kwdKzj Bmjvg, †iRvDj Kwig, Kv‡`i, kvby P›`ª `vm gvwbK `vm, jvejy wgqv, iv‡k` Avjx, Avt evix G‡`i Avwg wfwW dz‡U‡R mbv³ Kwi| Zv‡`i †bg‡c¬U I wfwWI dz‡UR †`‡L mbv³ Kw| i 9 j¶

66 nvRvi UvKvi gvjvgvj Avgvi evmv †_‡K jyU K‡i †bq|

PW 427 Mrs. Tasnuva Maha (Wife of Shahid

Captain Tanvir) has stated in her evidence that Avgvi

m¦vgx giûg †gRi Zvbfxi 25-02-09 mKvj Avgvi m¦vgx `ievi

n‡ji Rb¨ †ei n‡q hvq| Avwg Zvi ivbvi‡K †dvb Kwi †m e‡j

 


1

wfZ‡i MÛ‡Mvj| 9 21  Uvi w`‡K Avgvi ¯^vgxi †dvb eÜ cvB| c‡i ivbvi‡K †dvb Ki‡j †m Lvivc AvPib K‡i I agK ‡`q| Avwg c‡i

†gRi AvwRR‡K †dvb Kwi| †m Zvbwfi‡K †dvbUv †`q Ges Avwg K_v  ewj|  †m  e‡j  ˆmwbK  we‡`ªvn  K‡i‡Q| wKQz  ˆmwbK  Avgv‡`i `iRvq jvw_ †`q| c‡i Zvbwfi †dvb K‡i Rvbvq gvbyl gviv n‡”Q| Avgv‡K  ev_i“‡g  jywK‡q  _vK‡Z  e‡j| `iRv  †f‡½  Avgvi  N‡i

ˆmwbKiv Xz‡K c‡o| wmcvnx AvwZK, wRqv, nvweeyi AvgR` v, ivwReyj, igRvb, kIKZ, wmMb¨vj g¨vb †`‡jvqvi, wmcvnx mv‡jn, dinv`,

j¨v¤ú bv‡qK GKivgyj, wmcvnx Avj gvgyb wmcvnx wiqb Gi Avgvi evmvq Xz‡K| Avgv‡K ivB‡dj w`‡q evwi †`q N‡ii wRwblcÎ bó K‡i| Avgv‡K N‡ii evB‡i wb‡q j¨vÝ bv‡qK GKivgyj Avgvi Mjvq ivB‡dj a‡i I ¸wj K‡i Avgvi Mjvi cvk w`‡q P‡j hvq Avwg c‡o

hvB|  evB‡i  wmcvnx  †Qvnive,  IqvwQg,  Beªvwng,  dinv`, Zvivc` Avgv‡K †U‡b Zz‡j| Beªvnxg Kv‡Ri eyqv‡K gv‡i ev”Pv‡`  iKvco Ly‡j

†d‡j|  Avgv‡`i  †K  †KvqvUvi  Mv‡W©  wb‡q‡Q  iv¯Ívq  wnsmÖ Ae¯’vq ˆmwbK‡`i †`wL| iv¯Ívq wmcvnx gvmyg wiqvb, iwdKzj, gwkDi, Rv‡e`,

igRvb, wej v¬ j, †Lvi‡k`, †mvnive, knx`yj v¬ n, cëb PvKgv Avgv‡`i

†K ivB‡dj w`qv AvNvZ K‡i| wmcvnx nvmvb, wicb, û‡mb, Rv‡f`,

ivRy †KvqvU©vi Mv‡W© wQj| wmcvnx wRj yi¬ , wRqvDj, kIKZ, RvwKi, byi û‡mb, Avey mvB`, wmMb¨vj †`‡jvqvi, j¨vÝ bv‡qK GKivgyj, Kvgvj nvwej`vi Qvjvg gwZDi cvPK KvDQvi, wWGwW ‰mq` ‡ZŠnx`~j Avjg Giv †KvqvUvi Mv‡W©i mvg‡b wQj Avgv‡`i Mvwj MvjvR I gviai K‡i| 26-02-09 we‡Kj 4 Uv wWGwW †ZŠwn` e‡j Avgv‡`i‡K

mvwi K‡i †g‡i ‡djv n‡e|  

PW450 Regiment No. 70855 Sepoy Rajib

Kumar Singh has stated in his evidence that 25/2/09

Zvwi‡L e½eÜy †ówWqv‡g Abykxj‡b hvB| 8.00 mgq `iev‡i hvB| 9.00 `ievi ïi“ nq| 9.30 wgt wWwR Gi w`‡K GKRb A¯¿ ZvK K‡ib| ZLb evwni †_‡K ¸wji kã nq| Avwg nj †_‡K †ei n‡q

jvB‡b P‡j hvB| 11.30 wgt 54247 Rvjv‡ji †bZ‡Z¡ GK `j wewWAvi ¸jv¸wj K‡i I ej‡Z _v‡K mevB A¯¿ †bI| A‡b‡K A¯¿

†bq Zv‡`i g‡a¨ 66560 ewb Avwgb, 68884 BmwZqvK, 58055 kvnxb, 36605 evix, 56051 nvwg`, 67099 Rvnvb, 72051

cvi‡fR, 68099 Kwjgyj¬vn Ges 59514 Rwni wQj| Zvnviv ‰n ‰P

K‡i ¸wj K‡i I Dj¬vm K‡i| †mbv Awdmvi‡`i nZ¨v Ki‡Z n‡e

Rvbvq|

PW  452 No. 6162  JCO Naib Subedar Mir

Julhas Regimenthas stated in his evidence that

25/2/09 RSB gv‡V wQjvg| 9.30 wgt `ievi n‡j ¸wji ïwb|

36605 nvt †gRi evix evwk evwR‡q mKj‡K GKwÎZ K‡i wPËwe‡bv`b K‡¶ wb‡q hvq| Avwg e¨viv‡Ki 2 Zvjvq H w`b Ae¯ v’ b

Kwi| Abygvb 11 Uvq nvwej`vi Rvjv‡ji †bZ„‡Z¡ wewWAvi m`m¨iv ‰mwbK jvB‡bi eviv›`vi mvg‡b eªvk dvqvi K‡i| Avwg bx‡P Awdm

K‡¶ hvIqvi c‡_ 36 e¨vUvwjq‡bi 54247 nvwej`vi Rvjvj,

59514 wmcvnx Ry‡qj‡K ‰mwbK e¨viv‡Ki mvg‡b A¯¿ mn †w `L dvqvi

Ki‡Z| Zviv ej‡Z _v‡K Army officer †hLv‡b cv‡e †mLv‡b ¸wj

K‡i gvi‡Z n‡e|

PW 481 Regiment No. 70173 Sepoy Md. Abul

Kalam Azad has stated in his evidence that 25-2-09

Avwg 8.30 wgt `ievi n‡j hvB| 9.00 `ievi ïi“ nq| wmcvnx

gvBb mk¯¿ Ae¯ v’ q `ievi n‡j cÖ‡ek K‡i| Zv‡K AwdmviMb wbi¯¿ K‡i| c‡i wmcvnx KvRj cÖ‡ek K‡i| wewWAvi iv `vwo‡q hvq| Avwg `ievi nj †_‡K †ei n‡q †dvqvivi mvg‡b iv¯Ívq `vovB| 10.30 wgt

Gm,Gg (my‡e`vi ‡gRi) Awd‡m hvB| 12.30 wgt ‰mwbK jv‡ Bb hvIqvi mgq wewWAvi †`i mk¯¿ ‡`wL| 5/7 Rb Pickup wb‡q

ˆmwbK jvB‡b `vovq| 62742 wmcvnx Kvjvg‡K †`wL| †m e‡j †mbv Awdmvi‡`i Ly‡R †ei K‡i nZ¨v K‡i  | 

PW 498 Lance Naik Driver Syed Mahbubul

Alam has stated in his evidence that MZ 25/26 ‡deª“t/2009 R.S.U ‡Z Kg©iZ wQjvg| Avwg ‡gRi AvQv`‡K mKvj 8 Uvq Awd‡m Avwb | c‡i MT  jvB‡b Ae¯ v’ b Kwi| 9.30 wgt

`ievi n‡j ¸wj nq| A‡b‡K Unit GjvKvq †`Š‡o Av‡m| gvB‡K A¯¿ †bIqvi wb‡`©k ïwb| mܨvq jvB‡b Ae¯ v’ b Kwi| 25/02/09 ivwÎ 1

Uvq eviv›`vq G‡m ‡`wL 1Uv G¨v¤^y‡jÝ I A‡bK ˆmwbKJ CO 5046 BDQze Avjx, 45199 nvwej`vi `vD` Avjx, 51857 bRi“j, 52602 gwRei, 55953 Aveyj Kvjvg, 59625 Rwmg, 52253 kvnx

Av³vi, 54221 gwRei, 55451 Av‡bvqvi, 61993 Gg`v`yj K n,

52826 gvnZve †K mk¯¿ Ae¯ v’ q †`wL| AviI K‡qKRb‡K Kz`vj †ejPx nv‡Z †`wL| JCO  5046 my‡e`vi BDQze e‡j Avgiv 50/60

Rb †mbv Awdmvi‡K nZ¨v K‡iwQ| Zv‡`i jvk †d‡j ivLv wVK bq|

G¸wj jywK‡q †dj‡Z n‡e| giPzqvixi cwð‡g jyKv‡bvi e¨e¯ v’ Ki‡Z

n‡e| c‡i my‡e`vi BDQze mn AvmvgxMb giPzqvixi cv‡k hq v| Avwg giPzqvixi cv‡k wM‡q ‡`wL Avgvi ewb©Z Avmvgxiv mn A‡b‡K giPzqvixi cwðg cv‡k©¦ MZ© Lywo‡Z‡Q| c‡i †mbv Awdmvi‡`i jvk gvwU Pvcv †`Iqv nq|

PW 550 Begum Shahinur Parvin Jaba has

stated in his evidence that..........25/02/09 Avgvi ¯ v^ gx Kt

mvB` evmv †_‡K `ievi n‡ji D‡Ï‡k¨ we`vq †bq| 9.30 wgt j¨vt bvt

nvi“b †dvb K‡i e‡j `ievi n‡j MÛ‡Mvj n‡”Q| Avwg ‡dvb Ki‡j

†m Recive K‡i I e‡j Avwg fvj AvwQ Ges Avgv‡K mveavb _vK‡Z e‡j| `iRv Rvbvjv fvjfv‡e AvUwK‡q †d¬v‡i _vK‡Z e‡j| 44806

nvwej`vi Qvjvg †dvb K‡i e‡j ¸wj n‡”Q | Driver  Qvjvg Avgvi

†Q‡j‡K  e‡j  †mbvevwnbxi  †jvK  hviv  mevB‡K  †kl  Kiv  n‡e| Pickup  fwZ© A¯¿ wb‡q Sector  KgvÛv‡ii evmvq Av¸b jvwM‡q

‡`q| wewfbœ `j G‡m Avgvi `iRv †f‡½ †mbv Kg©KZ©v‡`i MvjvMvwj K‡i|  10/12  Rb  Avgvi  N‡i  Xy‡K  wRwbm   me  wb‡q  hvq| †Rvic‚e©K  Avgvi  †eW  i“‡g  Xy‡K  6/7  Rb  ey‡K  A¯¿  a‡i  e‡j Wvjfv‡Zi UvKv w`‡Z e‡j| Avgvi †Q‡j I‡`i nvZ a‡i e‡j gv

Amy¯ ¨’ | Iiv Avgvi †Q‡j‡K e‡j mevB‡K †kl K†i w`‡qwQ| Avgvi

Lv‡Ui Dci 2Rb e‡m c‡o cv Zz‡j| GKRb ˆmwbK Avgvi †Qj ‡‡K

e‡j g‡b nq mevB †kl n‡q ‡M‡Q| ivwÎ 31  Uvq GKRb ˆmwbK G‡m

2

e‡j †KD †e‡P bvB| 26/02/09 mKvj 9 Uvq GKRb ˆmwb‡Ki m‡½

†ei n‡q hvIqvi mgq A¯¿ ZvK K‡i Avgvi w`‡K | c‡i Avgv‡K

evmvq wdwi‡q †`q| c‡i evmv †_‡K ‡ei K‡i Av‡b Avgv‡K 4Uvi

w`‡K| mgq wKQz fyj n‡Z cv‡i| wewWAvi m`m¨iv e‡j G‡`i I †kl

K‡i †dj| wfwWI †`‡L I‡`i bvg mbv³ Kwi| Zv‡`i bvm wmcvnx nvweeyi ingvb wmcvnx †mŠif 66999, wmcvnx gyKzj 69638 û‡mb, wmcvnx ivRy, wmcvnx cëb PvKgv, wmcvnx knx`yj−vn, wmcvnx RvwKi

û‡mb, wmcvnx wmwÏK Avjg, wmcvnx AvwZKzi ingvb, wmcvnx igRvb, wmcvnx †Lvi‡k` Avjg †`i wPb‡Z cvwi| Giv gvbyl wQj bv| Zv‡`i AvPib ejv hvqbv| wmcvnx bvwQi 26/02/09 Zvwi‡L kïi evox wM‡q e‡j‡Q wWwR mn mevB‡K Lyb K‡i G‡mwQ| 

PW580 Md. Moktar Hossain has stated in his

evidence that........25/26 †d«t/09 we‡`ªvn PjvKv‡j wcjLvbvq Kg©iZ wQjvg| 25Ð2Ð09 `iev‡i  Dcw¯ Z’ wQjvg| wmcvnx gvBb

I KvRj Avjx A¯¿ nv‡Z `ievi n‡j cÖ‡ek K‡i| A‡bK ‰mwbK 

wWwR Gi Av‡`k Agvb¨ K‡i `ievi nj Z¨vM K‡i| Avwg `ievi

n‡jB _vwK| `ievi nj †_‡K †ei n‡q nvmcvZv‡j hvIhvi  mgq

wmcvnx  Ry‡qj (68696) I j¨vt bv‡qK BKivgyj†K (47474) Ges

igRvb†K `ievi n‡ji mvg‡b ¸wj Ki‡Z †`wL| wmcvnx igRvb 65571 `ievi nj j¶ K‡i eªvkdvqvi Ki‡ZwQj| 24 e¨vUvwjq‡bi ‰mwbK jvB‡bi mvg‡b my‡e`vi †gRi †Mvdivb gwj−K‡K A¯ n ¿v‡Z wPrKvi K‡i ej‡ZwQ‡jb mevB †Kv‡Z wM‡q A¯¿ †bb Zv‡`i wei“‡× i“‡L `vovb Zv‡`i nZ¨v K‡ib GKRb †mbv Awdmvi I †hb evP‡Z

bv cv‡i| Zvi cv‡k nvwej`vi kvneywÏb wQj| Avwg nv‡Z hLg †`wL|

kvwiwiK Ae¯nv fvj bv †`‡L jvB‡b P‡j hvB| iv‡Z nvmcvZv‡j Gg

AvB i“‡g wPwKrmvi Rb¨ hvB| †mLv‡b wmcvnx kwn`yj−vi m‡½ †`Lv

nq| kwn`yj−vn mn giPyqvix‡Z hvB A‡bK †jvK †`‡Lb| †mLv‡b

A‡bK †mbv Awdmv‡ii jvk †`L‡Z cvB| wWGwW byi“j û`v‡K †mLv‡b

mk¯¿  Ae¯ v’ q †`wL|  wWGwW  û`v  ‰mwbK   Gi  Øviv  gvwU LyovB‡ZwQ‡jb| †mbv Awdmvi‡`i jvk gvwU Pvcv †`Iqvi Rb¨|

wWGwW byi“j û`v e‡jb Avgiv †mbv Awdmvi†`i ¸wj K‡i nZ¨v

Ki‡Z †c‡iwQ †Zvgiv jvk gvwU Pvcv w`‡Z †`ix Ki‡Z‡Qv Zvov Zvwo

Ki|    

PW583  Faruque  Ahmed  has  stated  in  his

evidence that 25/02/09 Zvwi‡L 9 1  Uvq `ievi n‡ji w`‡K

2

¸wji kã ïwb| 101  Uvq †ei n‡q †`wL †RwmI-6091 †gvt BDbym,

2

68696 wmcvnx kvgxg Avj gvgyb Ry‡qj, Svoy`vi 3534  gv‡R` mi`vimn  AviI K‡qKRb †gRi  gwb‡ii gUi mvB‡Kj, †gRi BmwZqv‡Ki Mvox fvsPzi K‡i Av¸b jvwM‡q †`q| BDbym Avjx ‡mbv Awdmvi‡`i Mvwj MvjvR K‡i P‡j hvq mk¦¯¿ Ae¯ v’ q| 

PW584  Regiment  No.  69564  Sepoy  Md.

Rashedul Islam has stated in his evidence that MZ

25/02/09 wWwR Gi `iev‡i Ask MÖnb Kwi| MÛ‡Mvj ïi“ n‡j

`ievi nj †_‡K †ei nB‡q 24 e¨vUvwjq‡b 2 bs ‰mwbK jvB‡b

Ae¯ v’ b Kwi| hvIqvi c‡_ A‡bK mk¦¯¿ ˆmwbK †K ‡`wL Zviv `ievi

n‡ji w`‡K ¸wj Qzo‡Z‡Q| M¨v‡i‡Ri wcQ‡b 6091 my‡e`vi D Bbym,

68696 wmcvnx Ry‡qj, 3534 Svo `– vi gv‡R` mi`vi mn K‡K qRb

†`wL| BDbyQ Avjx e‡j‡Qb BmwZqvK G‡m‡Q wKbv †m †Kv_vq Av‡Q †LvR Ki Zv‡K LZg K‡i w`e| Zviv mK‡jB †gRi BmwZqv‡Ki Mvox

†gRi gwb‡ii gUi mvB‡Kj R¡vwj‡q †`q I fvsPzi K‡i| 

PW590  Regiment  No.  59334  Lance  Naik

Faruque Ahmed has stated in his evidence that MZ

25/02/09 Awd‡m wQjvg| Abygvb 91  Uvq `ievi n‡j ¸wji kã k–

2

wb| Abygvb 1021  Uvq i“g †_‡K †ei n‡q ‡`wL 24 e¨vUvwjq‡bi

wcQ‡b 6091 bvt myt BDbym, 68696 wmcvnx kvwgg Avj gvgyb Ry‡qj, 3534 Svoy`vi gv‡R` mi`vi mn †gRi gywb‡ii gUi mvB‡Kj I

‡gRi BmwZqv‡Ki private car  fvsPzi K‡i Av¸b jvMvB‡Z‡Q| BDbym Avjx †mbv Awdmvi‡`i D‡Ï‡k¨ AK_¨ fvlvq MvwjMvjvR K‡i mk¯¿ Ae¯ v’ †KvqvUvi Mv‡W© P‡j hvq|  

PW628 Colonel Saidul Kabir (Retd) has stated

in his evidence that............25-02-09 Zvs Avwg mKv‡j bv¯—

vi mgq nVvr K‡i Avwg Firing  Gi kã ïb‡Z cvB| ZLb mKvj AvbygvwbK 9Ð20 NwUKv n‡e| Avgvi Kv‡Q Live Bullet Firing

Gi kã AbywgZ nIqvq Avwg `vwo‡q hvB| 2/3 ivDÛ Firing nIqvi

ci Avwg Avgvi cÖv³b Awd‡mi Director-‡K †dvb Kwi †Uwj‡dv‡b| Avgvi P.A nvbœvb Rvbvq †h, ‰mwbKiv we‡`ªvn ïiy K‡i †KvZ fv½v ïiy K‡i‡Q| Avcwb cvi‡j cvwj‡q hvb| .............`ievi

n‡j †Mvjv¸wj ïiy n‡q‡Q| ˆmwb‡Kiv we‡`ªvn ïiy K‡i‡QÕÕ| .............Avgvi evmvq Situation ZLb Lye Lvivc, H evmvq ZLb

Avgvi e„×v gv, I Kv‡Ri †g‡q wQj| Avgvi Kv‡Ri †g‡q Avwjgyb,

Cook e¨vUg¨vb, Svo `– vi wQj| Avgvi wZb †g‡q ¯‹z‡j P‡j wM‡qwQj| Avgvi evmvq `ªyZ ˆmwb‡Ki GKwU `j P‡j Av‡m| Avwg `ªyZ ivb vœ N‡ii

 


1

nvwo cvwZj ivLvi ¯’v‡b KvV †ev‡W© Xz‡K hvB| 4/5 R‡b iˆmwbK `j Avgv‡`i `iRvq ‡Rv‡i jvw_ gv‡i| Avgvi gv `iRv Ly‡j ` †q| Zviv Avgv‡`i evmvq mk¯¿ fv‡e Zj−vkx K‡i|   Firing mode-G Zviv

wQj| Avwg me Observe  Kwi| Zviv Searching K‡i P‡j hvq|...........B‡Zvg‡a¨ Avwg Avgvi RvqMv cwieZ©b K‡i Toilet Gi

Dc‡ii False ceiling  Gi Dci D‡V hvB| mviv w`bB 15/20 wgwbU ci ˆmwbK‡`i `j G‡m  Searching  K‡i| BZ¨ em‡i Avwg †Uwj‡dv‡b wewfbœ `߇i †hvMv‡hvM Kwi| Avgv‡`i Kv‡Ri †g‡q‡K (25/26 eQi) ˆmwbKiv evmv †_‡K wb‡q hvq| Avevi w`‡q hvq| She has been physically violated.................c‡i Zviv Avgv‡K Av‡iKRb †gRi mn wb‡e e‡j Rvbvq| Avwg †gRi Kvgiƒj‡K WvwK| Zvi ¯¿x (pregnant)  `iRv Ly‡j †`b| Zvi ¯¿x e‡jb ˆmwbKiv Zvi †c‡U jvw_ †g‡iwQj| B‡Zvg‡a¨ Tremendous Firing PjwQj|

No. 70906 Sepoy Md Ibrahim CS accused

No.68 has stated in his confessional statement as

under:-


1

..........c‡ii w`b 25/02/09 Zvwi‡L `ievi n‡j Qwe †Zvjvi

`vwqZ¡ Avgvi wQj| ZvB H w`b mKvj 8.00 Uvi mgq Avwg 44 e¨vUvwjq‡bi Awd‡m hvB Ges †mLvb n‡Z miKvix K¨v‡giv wb‡q `ievi n‡j hvB|...........cÖvq 11.30 Uvi w`‡K Avwg, wmcvnx †mwjg, †mwjg, wmcvnx nvwee, wmcvnx AvjZvd, wmcvnx Ievq`yi, wmcvnx kvnxb mn 15/20 Rb BDR wWwR m¨v‡ii evs‡jv‡Z hvB| evs‡jvi †MB‡Ui mvg‡b feb MvW© nvwej`vi eveyj evav w`‡j wmcvnx †mwjg cv‡q ¸wj K‡i eveyj‡K †d‡j †`q| evsjv‡Z ¸wj| duvKv dvqvi

Ki‡Z _vwK| Avwg 02 ivDÛ duvKv ¸wj Kwi| wWwR g¨vWvg †`vZjv n‡Z †b‡g Av‡mb| co‡b g¨vw· wQj| g¨vWvg‡K wmuwo‡Z nvwee, AvjZvd, †mwjg Avi 2/3 Rb a‡i †d‡j Ges gyL †e‡a †d‡j| Avwg

Avi Ievq`yi cv‡k `uvovBqv wQjvg| Zvici g¨vWvg‡K KzK nvD‡R wb‡q wmcvnx nvwee, wmcvnx †mwjg, wmcvnx Ievq`yi, Avwg mn 3/4 Rb wg‡j jvwÂZ Kwi| Gici 2 Rb wmcvnx †`vZvjvq D‡V wM‡q duvKv dvqvi K‡i Ges wRwbmcÎ ZQbQ K‡i| Gici AviI 2/3 Rb mn

 


1

Avwg †`vZvjvq hvB| wM‡q †`wL 3 Rb BDR 15/20 erm‡ii GKwU

†g‡q‡K kvixwiKfv‡e wbh©vZb Ki‡Z‡Q|  †g‡qwUi KvbœvKvwUi Rb¨ Avwg `yB ivDÛ ¸wj Kwi| †g‡qwU gviv hvq| nVvr bx‡P ¸wji kã cvB| bx‡P †b‡g †`wL g¨vWvg‡K ¸wj K‡i nZ¨v Kiv nq| wmcvnx

†mwjg mn AviI 2/3 Rb ¸wj K‡i| Zvici Avwg mn Ab¨vb¨iv evs‡jv n‡Z †ei n‡q Awdmvm© †KvqvU©vi Gi wZbZjvi GKUv evmvq hvB| wmcvnx nvwee Avi wmcvnx kvnxb Avgv‡`i wbqv hvq| Avgv‡`i mv‡_ wmcvnx Ievq`yiI wQj| wmcvnx nvwee Avi wmcvnx kvnxb `iRv

bK K‡i| GUv K¨v‡Þb Zvbfx‡ii evmv| K¨v‡Þ‡bi ¯¿x `iRv Ly‡j

†`q| N‡i Xy‡K Avgiv mevB wg‡j g¨vWvg‡K wbh©vZb KwiG es evmv

Zj−vmx Kwi|

No. 77594 Sepoy Md Obaidul CS accused

No.48 has stated in his confessional statement as

under:-

........... 25/02/09 Cw a¡¢lM 6.30 ¢j¢eV HL¢V jC Hhw 1¢V ®V¢hm ¢e−u B¢j, q¡¢hmc¡l L¡−nj ¢pf¡q£ B−a¡u¡l ¢pf¡q£ j š¤ ²¡¢cl,

¢pf¡q£ n¢gL¥m pq ®j¡V 13 Se Ju¡¢LÑ NË¡E−ä (RSB) k¡Cz...........Aaxfl Bjl¡ DG j−q¡c−ul h¡p¡l ¢c−L k¡Cz ¢N−u ®c¢M ®kM¡−e ¢pf¡q£ q¡¢hh J ¢pf¡q£ ®p¢mj pq 10/15 Se ®m¡L z

Bjl¡ ph¡C f−l h¡p¡l ¢ial Y¤L−m ¢pf¡q£ q¡¢hh J ¢pf¡q£ ®p¢mj

g¡L¡ …¢m L−lz g¡u¡−ll në ö−e DG jÉ¡X¡j ¢e−Q ®e−j Bp−m ¢pf¡q£ q¡¢hh J ¢pf¡q£ ®p¢mj pq 3/4 Se DG jÉ¡X¡j ®L d−l

®g−mz ¢pf¡q£ ®p¢mj a¡l S¡j¡ d−l V¡e¡ ®qQs¡ Ll−a b¡−L Hhw HL

fkÑ¡−u a¡−L n¡¢ll£L i¡−h ¢ekÑ¡ae m¡¢’a L−l Bj¡l p¡j−ez

Aaxfl Bjl¡ 2 am¡ E−W k¡Cz f−l ö−e¢R ¢pf¡q£ q¡¢hh J B−l¡J 1

Se DG jÉ¡X¡j-®L n¡¢ll£L i¡−h m¡¢’a L−l−Rz c¤C am¡u EW−aC

DG jÉ¡X¡−jl L¡−Sl ®j−u−L …¢m L−l p¡j−e ®b−L j¤−M¡nd¡l£ HL Se ¢àa£u am¡u Civil ®f¡o¡−L HLSe f¤l¦o J HLSe j¢qm¡−L ®cM−a f¡Cz aMe j¤−M¡n d¡l£ HLSe hÊ¡n g¡u¡l L−lz B¢j J

B−a¡u¡l aMe 1 l¡Eä L−l a¡−cl …¢m L¢l Hhwa¡l¡ avre¡v j¡l¡

k¡uz f−l öe−a f¡C a¡l¡ L−eÑm ®c−m¡u¡l J a¡q¡l Ù»£z Aaxfl j¤−M¡nd¡l£ HLSe L−eÑm ®c−m¡u¡−ll Ù»£l j¡b¡l Efl T.V ®g−m

phÑ−no BO¡a L−lz Bjl¡ Aaxfl e£−Q ®e−j ®c¢M Cook  Hl

clS¡l p¡j−e D.G jÉ¡X¡−jl m¡nz a¡l m¡n aMe lš²¡š² J nl£−ll

¢h¢iæ S¡uN¡u e¡e¡ lLj BO¡−al ¢Qq² ®c¢Mz ®pM¡−e ®b−L B¢j J B−a¡u¡l 3ew ®N−Vl L¡−R l¡Ù¹¡l f§hÑ f¡−nÄÑ DAD ®L¡u¡VÑ¡−l B¢pz Bjl¡ c¤C am¡ E−W clS¡ M¤−mC ®c¢M HLSe jÉ¡X¡j n¡l£ f¢l¢qa¡z

Eš² jÉ¡X¡j−L fÐb−j HLSe j¤−M¡nd¡l£ n¡¢ll£L i¡−h m¡¢’a L−l

f−l B−a¡u¡l a¡−L n¡¢ll£Li¡−h m¡¢’a L−lz B¢j aMe c¡y¢s−u ph¢LR¤ ®c¢Mz Aaxfl Bjl¡ h¡p¡ charge L¢l Hhw B¢j Ju¡XÊf

®b−L 4000 V¡L¡ f¡Cz f−l I jÉ¡X¡j ®L ¢e−u Bp¡l pju ¢p¢Xl

d¡−l 1¢V h¡µQ¡ ®c¢Mz aMe I h¡µQ¡ J jÉ¡X¡j ®L ¢e−u ®L¡u¡V ¡Ñ l N¡−XÑ a¡−cl BV−L l¡¢Mz

Legal aspects of the case with regard to

Sections 120B, 34 and 149 of the Penal Code and

Section 10 of The Evidence Act and application of

the same in the instant case.

During hearing of the criminal appeals, jail

appeals, government appeal and death reference, the

question arises as to whether Section 34 or Section

149 of the Penal Code is applicable to the present case or as to whether both the Sections would be applicable in the present case. Mr. S. M. Shahjahan and Mr. Md. Aminul Islam, the learned Advocates for some of the convict-appellants/accused with reference to a decision in the case of Altaf Hossain Vs. The State reported in 50 DLR(AD)(1998)120, submit that the convict-appellants/ accused cannot be found guilty both under Sections 34 and 149 of the Penal Code.

        It is argued on behalf of the learned Attorney- General for Bangladesh that since the convicts of this case following a pre-concert of killing of the army officers taken in a conspiracy participated in the commission of offences making unlawful assembly with a view to overthrowing the army officers from the BDR by way of killing, Section 149 of the Penal Code is applicable in the instant case since its scope and application are more wider than Section 34 of the Penal Code while Mr. Mosharaf Hossain Kazol, the Government prosecutor acted as Additional Attorney- General with reference to a case of Bangladesh Vs. Abed Ali reported in 36 DLR(AD)(1984)234, submits that since the common intention and common object of the convicts/accused as to killing of the army officers in the instant case are one and same, both sections are applicable to the instant case.

It may be noted that the word common intention has been described in Section 34 of the Penal Code which runs as follows: when a criminal act is done by several persons in furtherance of the common intention of all, each of such persons is liable for that act in the same manner as if it were done by him alone. It will be profitable to quote Section 35 of the Penal Code which postulates that if any criminal act is done by several persons having criminal knowledge or intention, everyone present over the place of occurrence shall be liable for that criminal act. Section 35 of the Penal Code contemplates as under: whenever an act, which is criminal only by reason of its being done with a criminal knowledge or intention, is done by several persons, each of such persons who joins in the act with such knowledge or intention is liable for the act in the same manner as if the act were done by him alone with that knowledge or intention. Section 34 of the Penal Code is not a penal provision rather it is a rule of evidence. This section neither creates a substantive offence nor does it create a distinct offence. It simply lays down a principle of joint liability which may also be termed as constructive liability or vicarious liability. The essential ingredients of this sections are as follows:(i) that the criminal act

In this connection, I may refer to a large number of cases on principle of joint liability. The case of Emperor Vs. Barendra Kumar Ghosh, reported in AIR 1925(P.C)1 is one of the celebrated and milestone judgments expounding the principle of joint liability as animated in Section 34 of the Penal Code. The fact of the above case is that on August 03, 1923, the Sub post master at Sankaritolla post office was counting money at his table in the back room. During that period, several persons appeared therein, entered into the room and called on him to give up the money. The persons appeared there opened fire at him as a result of which he died almost at once having received injury on the different parts of the body. The appellant Barendra Kumar Ghosh being pursued by post assistant and others with commendable tenacity and encourage was eventually secured just after he had thrown his pistol away, but the others escaped from the place of occurrence. The pistol was at once picked up and was produced at the trial. The evidence led by the prosecution is that three man fired at the post master of whom the appellant Barendra Kumar Ghosh was one; that he wore distinctive clothes by which he could be and was identified; that while these men were just inside the room, another was visible from the room through the door standing close to the others but just outside the doorstep in the courtyard; and that this man was armed but did not fire. The defence case of Barendra Kumar Ghosh was that he was the man outside the room; that he stood in the courtyard and

“As soon, however, as the other sections of this part of the Code are looked at, it becomes plain that the words of section 34 are not to be eviscerated by reading them in this exceedingly limited sense. By Section 33 a criminal act in Section 34 includes a series of acts and, further act includes omission to act, for example, an omission to interfere in order to prevent a murder being done before one’s very eyes. By Section 37, when any offence is committed by means of several acts whoever intentionally cooperates in the commission of that offence by doing any one of those acts, either singly or jointly with any other person, commits that offence. Even if the appellant did nothing as he stood outside the door, it is to be remembered that in crimes as in other things “they also serve who only stand and wait.” By Section 38 when several persons are engaged or concerned in the commission of a criminal act, they may be guilty of different offences by means of that acts. Read together, these sections are reasonably plain. Section 34 deals with the doing of separate acts, similar or

In view of the decision discussed above, the dominating feature of Section 34 of Penal Code is that if two or more persons intentionally do a thing jointly, it is just the same as if each of them has done it individually.

 In this regard, I may refer to a another decision in the case of Ramaswami Vs. State of Tamil Nadu reported in AIR 1976 Supreme Court 2027. The prosecution story of that case, in short, was that the victim namely Kaliaperumal was living with his maternal uncle pichai konar PW 7 since his infancy. There was an enmity between the PW7 and the accused on account of several causes. On the date of occurrence, PW10 was driving some cattle, four or five of them went astray and entered into the gingilli kollai field belonging to accused No.1. For this reason, accused No.1’s men scolded PW 10 and the victim who was informed about the incident by PW 10 at a tea shop.  PW 1 was also present there. Victim Kaliaperumal passed on the information to PW7. While the victim started bathing at the north-western corner at the tank, accused no.1 came there followed by accused Nos.2-6. Accused No.2 had a cross-staff in his hand, accused Nos. 3 and 4 were armed with an aruval, accused No.5 had a stick and accused No.6 was carrying a stick with spear head. According to the evidence in Court, at the time of altercation between the accused and the victim, accused Nos. 3 and 4 assaulted the victim on his head with aruvals. When PW1 ran to separate them, accused No.2 assaulted him on his head with the cross-staff. Thereafter, PW1 attempted to run away. Thereupon accused No.6 obstructed him from running with the help of the stick with spear head. Then accused No.4 again cut on the head of the victim with his aruval. Trial Court acquitted accused Nos. 1, 5 and 6 of the charge of murder, convicted accused Nos. 3 and 4 of the charge

“The contention is fallacious and cannot be accepted. Section 34 is to be read along with the preceding Section 33 which makes it clear that the “act” spoken of in Section 34 includes a series of acts as a single act. It follows that the words “when a criminal act is done by several persons”. So Section 34 may be construed to mean “when criminal acts are done by several persons.” The acts committed by different confederates in the criminal action may be different but all must in one way or the others participate and engage in the criminal enterprise, for instance, one may only stand guard to prevent any person coming to the relief of the victim or to otherwise facilitate the execution of the common design. Such a person also commits an ‘‘act’’ as much as his co-participants actually commits the planned crime. In the case of an offence involving physical violence, however, it is essential for the application of Section 34 that the person who instigates or aids the commission of the crime must be physically present at

In order to attract section 34, it is essential that several accused participate not only in design but also in action. In other words, it is not sufficient that several accused share a common intention to commit an offence but they should also actually participate in the commission of offence by doing some act or the other in furtherance of that common intention. For application of section 34 of the Penal Code, there should be prior meeting of minds and it must precede the criminal act and further there should be participation of all in furtherance of that common intention. Common intention implies a pre-arranged plan and acting in concert pursuant to the plan. It must be proved that the criminal act was done in concert pursuant to the pre-arranged plan. Common intention comes into being prior to the commission of the act in point of time, which needs not be a long gap.

        The scope and application of Section 34 of the Penal Code in regard to vicarious liability, I can mention a decision in the case of Sreekantia Ramayya Munipalli and another V. State of Bombay reported in AIR 1955 S.C. 287 (Vol. 42 C.N. 51). The prosecution story of that case in short was that accused Sreekantia Ramayya Munipalli and two others were in charge of a Government store of different goods and they entered into a conspiracy to defraud Government of these properties. In pursuance of this conspiracy they arranged to sell the goods to the approver (PW1) for a sum of 4,000. The money is said to have been paid and then the goods were passed out of the depot. The money is said to have been pocketed by the three accused and not credited to Government. On these facts a number of charges were framed. The ratio regarding the application of Section 34 in that case was made in the following manner:-

      ‘‘The essence of the misdirection consists in his direction to the jury that even though a person “may not be present when the offence is actually committed” and even if he remains behind the screen” he can be convicted under Section 34 provided it is proved that the offence was committed in furtherance of the common intention. This is wrong, for it is the essence of Section that the person must be physically present at the actual commission of the crime. He need not be present in the actual room; he can, for instance, stand guard by a gate outside ready to warn his companions about any approach of danger or wait in a car on a nearby road ready to facilitate their escape of the occurrence and must actually participate in the commission of the offence in some way or other at the time of crime is actually being committed. The antithesis is between the preliminary stages, the agreement, the preparation, the planning, which is covered by Section 109, and the stage of commission when the plans are put into effect and carried out. Section 34 is concerned with the latter. It is true that there must be some sorts of preliminary

       Though establishing common intention is a difficult task for the prosecution, yet, however difficult it may be, the prosecution has to establish it by evidence, whether direct or circumstantial that there was a plan or meeting of mind of all the assailants to commit the offence, be it pre-arranged or on the spur of the moment but it must necessarily be before the commission of the crime. Where direct evidence is not available, it has to be inferred from the circumstantial evidence.

 The  principle of joint liability with the aid of section 34 of the Penal Code was clearly illustrated in the decision in the case of Tukaram Ganpat Pandare Vs. The State of Maharashtra reported in AIR (1974)(SC)514 wherein the case for prosecution was that the appellant Tukaram Ganpat Pandare and 4 others burgled 40 bundles of copper wire kept in the godown of a company by unlocking the lock of the godown, took away the stolen goods by a lorry and on its way, the lorry was stopped at the weight bridge where the broker for sale of the stolen properties was present. One of the witnesses stated in his deposition that when accused No. 3 took him to the weight bridge on that morning, he saw a stationary lorry laden with copper wire bundles and accused Nos. 1 and 2 near the lorry and that accused No. 3 introduced accused no.2 to him as the owner of the goods. The appellant in the absence of direct evidence to connect him with the alleged offence of theft pleads innocence. However the fact remains that appellant was found in possession of Rupees 4800 and a bunch of keys identified as duplicates of the godown keys. Under the circumstances, the application of joint liability under section of the 34 of the Penal Code was outlined as follows:- 

“Mere distance from the scene of crime cannot exclude culpability under Section 34 which lays down the rule of joint responsibility for a criminal act performed by a plurality of persons. In Barendra Kumar Ghosh V. The King Emperor (AIR 1925 PC1), the Judicial Committee drew into the criminal net

those ‘who only stand and wait.’ This does not mean that some form of presence, near or remote, is not necessary, or that mere presence without more, at the spot of crime, spells culpability. Criminal sharing, overt or covert by active presence or by distant direction, making out a certain measure of jointness in the commission of the act is the essence of Section 34. Even assuming that presence at the scene is a pre- requisite to attract Section 34 and that such propinquity is absent. Section 107 which is different in one sense, still comes into play to rope in the accused. The act here is not the picking the godown lock but house-breaking and criminal house trespass. This crime is participated in by those operating by remote control as by those doing physical removal. Together operating in concert, the criminal project is executed. Those who supply the duplicate key, wait at the weigh

bridge for the break-in and bringing of the booty and later secrete the keys are participatory criminals. And this is the role of accused No.2 according to the Courts below. Could this legal inference be called altogether untenable?..............

Where the intended aim is an actus reus, and a different actus reus of the same crime is committed, the liability is the same as if the intended harm had been inflicted, provided the mens rea is the same for each. The common intention within the meaning of section 34 of Penal Code implies pre-arranged plan. Where no criminal act was done in concert pursuant to such a plan, it will be liable for his individual act. Common intention however may develop on the spot after the offenders gather there. A previous plan is not necessary. To invoke section 34, pre-arranged plan or meeting of minds is a sine qua non.

It is no doubt true that it has been held by the Privy Council in several cases that to attract the principles of constructive liability under section 34 of the Penal Code it is necessary to establish something in the nature of a pre-concert but the Privy Council in so many cases has pointed out that such a consensus could even be hastily conceived amongst the participants in the crime at the spur of moment almost immediately before its execution. In support of this contention, reliance may be placed on a decision in the case of Rasool Bux Vs. The State, 22 DLR (SC) 297. The case for prosecution of that case was that the appellant Rasool Bux and 3 others in the midnight went to the house belonging to one Shah Muhammad in order to kidnap his daughter namely Mosammat Roshna who after marriage went to her parents house to see her mother. Lal Bux was armed with a single

barrel gun while his brother Rasool Bux was armed with pistol. At the time of occurrence the inmates of the house raised cries as a result of which the close neighbors namely Dhani Bux and others rushed towards the house of Shah Muhammad, reached the entrance of the house and challenged the culprits. Having been obstructed, Lal Bux shot at him with his gun. Then Rasool Bux also fired two shots in the air with his pistol to frighten away the other villagers. They fell back and the appellant escaped along with other companions. The villagers chased them but the culprits soon disappeared in a jungle. However, Dhani Bux had succumbed to his injury. Under the circumstances, question arises whether the accused- appellant and others committed the murder in furtherance of common intention of all and whether accused-appellant Rasool Bux who did not shot at the

victim but opened fire in the air only to prevent the villagers from approaching them would be liable for the offence of murder and for the offence of constructive liability for murder under section 34 of the penal code. In that case, it was held that; “ In the present case evidence unmistakably discloses that Lal Bux and Rasool Bux were both bent upon a joint venture, namely; the abduction of Mst. Roshna from the house of her father Shah Muhammad, if necessary, by the use of force or show of force. They were both armed with deadly weapons. It is true that when their presence was discovered in the courtyard of Shah Muhammad they abandoned their original plan but were nevertheless both equally determined to make good their escape, if necessary, by the use of the weapons carried by them. This common intention though originally not present was formed at the spur of the moment when they found themselves being surrounded by persons attracted to the place at the cries of Shah Muhammad. It was at this stage that Lal Bux fired directly at the person, who was ahead of those coming to prevent their escape and Rasool Bux simultaneously fired two shots in the air. They both, therefore, fired with the common intention of preventing the interceptor from cutting off their escape. It is difficult, therefore, to appreciate how it can be said that they were not acting in furtherance of the common intention of them both.”

          In the  case of the State Vs Tajul Islam and others reported in 15 BLD(1995)(HC)53 it appears from the judgment that accused Tajul Islam stated in his confessional statement he himself killed Biroja Rani by cutting her into two pieces at the level of umblilicus by giving 2/3 Ram dao blows and that accused Badsha in his confession stated that he pressed the legs of second son of Biroja Rani namely Sumon Debnath and accused Inu cut him into two pieces by a dao. The other confessing accused stated that for the purpose of committing the offence they went to the house of Biroja and were on guard either in the boat or in front of the door of neighbours of Biroja or in the road leading to the house of Biroja presumably to prevent any person from coming to the scene of the occurrence and create hindrance in the way of their committing the offence. In the facts of the case, the learned Judges of the High Court Division observed as follows:-

“In offences involving physical violence, normally presence at the scene of the occurrence of the offender sought to be rendered liable on the principle of joint liability is necessary but such is not the case in respect of other offences where offence consists of diverse acts which may be done at different times and places.”

Commenting on Section 34 of the Penal Code, the High Division in the aforesaid case decided as follow:-

“Section 34 does not create any distinct offence. This section is intended to meet a case where members of a party acted in furtherance of the common intention of all but it was difficult to prove exactly the part played by each of them. It means that if two or more persons intentionally do a thing jointly, it is just the same as if each of them had done it individually. Common intention within the meaning of this section presupposes a prior concert. There must be prior meeting of minds to form pre-arranged plan to commit an offence. A common intention with meeting of minds to commit an offence in furtherance of the common intention invites the application of Section 34 of the Penal Code. In offences involving physical violence, normally presence at the scene of the offence of the offender sought to be rendered liable on the principle of joint liability is necessary but such is not the case in respect of other offences where offence consists of diverse acts which may be done at different time and place.”

          In the case of Noor Mohammad Mohd. Yusuf Momin (appellant) V. The State of Maharastra, reported in AIR1971(SC)885, the trial Court convicted Mohd. Taki Haji Hussain Momin under Sections 302 and acquitted three other accused including the appellant. On appeal against acquittal, the Bomaby High Court reversed the acquittal and convicted the appellant and two others under Sections 120B and 302 read with Section 34 I.P.C. The appellant was also convicted under Sections 302/109 IPC and sentenced to imprisonment for life. In the aforesaid case, the scope and application and the distinctive features of Section 34, 107 and 120B of the Penal Code have been illustrated in the following manner:-

“So far as Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code is concerned, it embodies the principle of joint liability in the doing of a criminal act, the essence of that liability being the existence of a common intention. Participation in the commission of the offence in furtherance of the common intention invites its application. Section 109 of the Indian Penal Code on the other hand may be attracted even if the abettor is not present when the offence abetted is committed provided that he has instigated the commission of the offence or has engaged with one or more other persons in a conspiracy to commit an offence and pursuant to that conspiracy some act or illegal omission takes place or has intentionally aided the commission of an offence by an act or illegal omission. Turning to the charge under Section 120B of the Indian Penal Code criminal conspiracy was made a substantive offence in 1913 by the introduction of chapter V-A in the Indian Penal Code. Criminal conspiracy postulates an agreement between two or more persons to do, or cause to be done, an illegal act or an act which is not illegal, by illegal means. It differs from other offences in that mere agreement is made an offence even if no step is taken to carry out that agreement. Though there is close association of conspiracy with incitement and abetment the substantive offence of criminal conspiracy is somewhat wider in amplitude than abetment by conspiracy as contemplated its very

Section 149 of the Penal Code creates a specific distinct and substantive offence. The object of the section is to make clear that an accused person whose case falls within its term cannot put forward the defence that he did not, with his own hand, commit the offence committed in prosecution of common object. For the purpose of application of section 149, the prosecution has to prove the presence and participation in an unlawful assembly. It is essential for the prosecution to establish by leading evidence that: (i) that was an unlawful assembly ; (ii) that the accused formed part of such an assembly; (iii) that an offence was committed by such an assembly; (iv) that the accused had intentionally joined such an assembly or that the accused continued in such an unlawful assembly; (v) and that the accused had knowledge of the common object of such an assembly; (vi) that such an offence was committed either in prosecution of the common object of such assembly or accused, as a member of the assembly knew that such an offence was likely to be committed in prosecution of such common object.  The prosecution must lead clear evidence about the object of the unlawful assembly and to specify as to whether the object was unlawful for the purpose of commission of murder and grievous hurts.

Section 149 is more wider than section 34 of the Penal Code. Both sections deal with liability for constructive criminality that is liability for an offence not committed by the person charged. The liability under section 149 is founded on common object and the liability under Section 34 is founded on common intention. 

 Once it is demonstrated from all the facts and circumstances of a given case that he shared the common object of the unlawful assembly in furtherance of which some offence was committed or he knew it was likely to be committed by any other person, he would be guilty of that offence.

      Under section 149 of the Penal Code, it is the knowledge which is necessary to attract the culpability. This section creates a specific offence and makes every member of the unlawful assembly liable for the offence or offences committed in the course of the occurrence provided the same was/were committed in prosecution of the common object and the members of that assembly knew such was/were likely to be committed. Since this section imposes a constructive penal liability, it must be strictly construed so as to punish members of an unlawful assembly for the offence or offences committed by their associate or associates in carrying out the common object of the assembly. Mere presence in an unlawful assembly cannot render a person liable unless there was a common object. When a person remains present at the place of occurrence as onlooker, he may at the best be considered as an eye-witness of the incident but when a person remaining present at this spot facilitates and promotes the commission of offence by any means, his presence at the spot is tantamount to actual participation in the criminal act. The common object has to be definitely found and has not to be a matter of conjecture. Doing some overt act is not necessary to bring home charge under section 149. Common object of the unlawful assembly can be gathered from the

Having considered all the facts and circumstances of the case, the evidence adduced by the prosecution, the submissions advanced by the respective parties and propositions of laws settled in the case of Altaf Hossain Vs. The State reported in 50 DLR(AD)(1998)120, Tozammel Hussain Chowdhury Vs State reported in 28DLR(AD) (1976)170, Bangladesh Vs. Abed Ali reported in 36 DLR(AD)(1984)234, Barendra Kumar Ghose V. Emperor, AIR 1925 (P.C)1, Tukaram Gonapat V. State of Maharashtra AIR 1974 SC 514, Rasool Bux Vs. The State 22 DLR (SC) 297, Bangabandhu Murder Case, Volume. VI(A)2010(ADC), Ramaswami V. State of T.N. AIR 1976 SC. 2027, Abdur Rahman Mandol Vs. The State, 29DLR(SC)247, Abdus Samad @A.K.M Abdus Samad Vs. The State 44 DLR(AD)233, State Vs. Tajul Islam and others 48 DLR 305, Nur Mohammad Mohd. Yusuf Momin Vs. The State of Maharashtra reported in AIR 1971 SC 885 L.D. Dua, Abdus Sattar and

others Vs. The State 14BLD(AD)(1994)133, Rafiqul Islam Vs. The State13 BLD (AD)(1993) 117, Irengbam Labei Sing and others Vs. State of Monipur 1982 CRI. L.J.2112, I am of the view that since the common intention and common object as to killing the army officers in the instant case appears to be one and same, overlapping, interconnected and twisted with each other having no scope to separate one from the another, the accused may be convicted and sentenced both under Sections 34 and 149 of the Penal Code together and scope and application of Section 149 of the Penal Code are more wider than Section 34 of the Penal Code.

Criminal conspiracy under Section 120A and 120B of the Penal Code and the scope and application of section 10 of the Evidence Act in order to connect an accused with the offence of

criminal conspiracy and to use the confessional statement of an accused as evidence against the co- accused/co-conspirator.

           During hearing of the criminal appeals and death reference, Mr. Mahbubey Alam, the learned Attorney-General for Bangladesh and Mr. Mosarof Hossain Kazal, the Government prosecutor acted as Additional Attorney-General, submits that in a case of conspiracy, the confession of co-accused can be used as evidence against the co-accused. They next submit that since many convicts-appellants after being arrested by the police made 164 statements before the Magistrate involving themselves and others depicting that how they made conspiracy to kill the army officers sitting in different places as well as narrating their roles played at the time of commission of offences and the confessional statements appear to be

true and voluntary, the said confessional statements may be used as evidence against the other co- conspirators  as per section 10 of the Evidence Act,1872. Contrary to aforesaid submission, Mr. S.M. Shahjahan and Mr. Aminul Haque, submit that the confessional statements of conspirators cannot be used against the co-conspirators once the confessing accused in connection with the conspiracy gets snapped after being arrested by the police. They next submit that the provision of Section 10 of the Evidence Act, 1872 can only be used against co- accused during the existence of the conspiracy.

Criminal conspiracy is an agreement, by two or more persons to do, or cause to be done, an illegal act or an act, which is not by illegal means. The agreement is the gist of the offence. In order to constitute a single general conspiracy, there must be a common design and common intention of all to work in furtherance of the common design. Each conspirator plays his separate part in one integrated and united effort to achieve the common purpose. Each one is aware that he has a part to play in a general conspiracy though he may not know all its secrets or the means by which the common purpose is to be accomplished. The evil scheme may be promoted by a few, some may drop out and some may join at a later stage, but the conspiracy continues until it is broken up. The conspiracy may develop in successive stages. The essence of the offence of conspiracy is the fact of combination by agreement. The agreement may be express or implied, or in part express and in part implied. The conspiracy arises and the offence is committed as soon as the agreement is made; and the offence continues to be committed so long as the

(1) that there must be an agreement between the persons who are alleged to conspire; and (2) that the agreement should be (i) for doing of an illegal act, or

(ii)    for doing by illegal means an act which may not itself be illegal. The gist of the offence under Section 120-A is that the agreement between two or more persons to do or cause to be done an illegal act or a legal act by illegal means subject to the proviso that the agreement does not, except agreement to commit offence, amount to a conspiracy unless it is followed by an overt act done by one or more persons in pursuance of such an agreement. An agreement to do an illegal act which amounts to a conspiracy will continue as long as the members of the conspiracy remain in agreement and as long as they are acting in accord and in furtherance of the object for which they entered into the agreement. 

In order to prove a criminal conspiracy which is punishable under Section 120-B, there must be direct or circumstantial evidence to show that there was an agreement between two or more persons to commit an offence. This clearly envisages that there must be a meeting of minds resulting in an ultimate decision taken by the conspirators regarding the commission of an offence. It is true that in most cases it will be difficult to get direct evidence of an agreement to conspire but a conspiracy can be inferred even from circumstances giving rise to a conclusive or irresistible inference of an agreement between two or more persons to commit an offence.

A conspiracy from its very nature is generally hatched in secrecy. It is, therefore, extremely rare that direct evidence in proof of conspiracy can be forthcoming from wholly disinterested quarters or from utter strangers. But, like other offences, criminal conspiracy can be proved by circumstantial evidence. Indeed, in most cases, proof of conspiracy is largely inferential though the inference must be founded on solid facts, surrounding circumstances, antecedents and subsequent conducts. In fact because of the difficulties in having direct evidence of criminal conspiracy, once reasonable ground is shown for believing that two or more persons have conspired to commit an offence then anything done by anyone of them in reference to their common intention after the same is entertained becomes, according to the law of evidence, relevant for proving both conspiracy and the offences committed pursuant thereto. Direct proof of a conspiracy is, of course, seldom available. In a case of conspiracy, when there is no direct evidence, inferences from the proved facts and circumstances, to a larger extent, form the basis of the Court’s conclusion with regard to conspiracy.

       In the case of Kehar Sing and others Vs The State (Delhi Admn.) popularly known as Smt. Indira Gandhi Murder Case reported in AIR1988(SC)1883, it has been decided as follows:-

   “Generally, a conspiracy is hatched in secrecy and it may be difficult to adduce direct evidence of the same. The prosecution will often rely on evidence of acts of various parties to infer that they were done in reference to their common intention. The prosecution will also more often rely upon circumstantial evidence. The conspiracy can be undoubtedly proved by such evidence direct or circumstantial. But the Court must enquire whether the two persons are independently pursuing the same end or they have come together to the pursuit of the unlawful object. The former does not render them conspirators, but the latter does. It is, however, essential that the offence of conspiracy requires some kind of physical manifestation of agreement. The express agreement, however, need not be proved. Nor proof of actual meeting of two persons is necessary. Nor it is necessary to prove the actual words of communication. The evidence as to transmission of thoughts sharing the unlawful design may be sufficient.  The relative acts or conducts of parties must be conscientious and clear to mark their concurrence as to what should be done. The concurrence cannot be inferred by a group of irrelevant facts artfully arranged so as to give an appearance of coherence. The innocuous, innocent or inadvertent events and incidents should not enter the judicial verdict”

      So, it is not necessary that all the conspirators must know each and every details of the conspiracy as long as they are co-participators in the main object of the conspiracy. There must be unity of object but there may be plurality of means sometimes even unknown to one another. 

During hearing, another question arises  as to whether under Section 10 of the Evidence Act, 1872, the confessional statements made by co-accuseds even if found to be true and voluntary are admissible in evidence against the co-accuseds and co-conspirators to prove the charge of criminal conspiracy after the cessation of the conspiracy.

 It appears that Section 10 of the Evidence Act, 1872 will come into play only when the court is satisfied that there is reasonable ground to believe that two or more persons have conspired together to commit an offence or an actionable wrong, that is, to say, there should be a prima facie evidence that a person was a party to the conspiracy before his act can be used against his conspirators. Once such a reasonable ground exists, anything said, done or written by one of the conspirators in reference to the common intention, after the said intention was first entertained, is relevant against others, not only for the purpose of proving the existence of the conspiracy but also for proving that the other person was a party to it. The evidentiary value of the said act is limited by two circumstances, namely, that the act shall be in reference to their common intention and in respect of a period after such period was entertained by any one of them.

In the case of Emperor of India V. Abani Bhusan Chakrabarty, 15 CWN 25, a question arose whether confessions of co-accuseds are relevant facts under Section 10 of the Evidenced Act. In the above decision, the Full Bench observed as follows:-

“The first piece of evidence we referred a short time ago. It is argued, on behalf of the Crown, that statement comes within the provisions of Section 10 to the Indian Evidence Act, and is therefore to be treated as evidence against Abani’s fellow- prisoners. It is said that, if it does not fall within Section 10 at any rate, under the provisions of Section 30, it is a confession of one of the co-accused and may be referred to in the course of the trial. It is argued by Mr. Roy with very considerable force that in any case, its value can be no higher than that of the evidence of an accomplice, and that, indeed, it is of less value than the evidence of an accomplice, because an accomplice can be cross-examined for the purpose of testing his accuracy, while this confession of Abani made when he was a prisoner cannot be subject to that test. There is, of course, very great force in that argument. We have come to the conclusion that the statement of

 This point was then explained and considered in the case of Mirza Akbor V. King Emperor, AIR 1940 (PC) 176. Their Lordships of the Privy Council in consideration of different authorities and Section 10 of the Evidence Act observed as follows:-

“This being the principle, their Lordships think the words of S.10 must be construed in accordance with it and are not capable of being widely construed so as to capable of being widely construed so as to include a statement made by one conspirator in the absence of the other with reference to past acts done in the actual course of carrying out the conspiracy, after it has been completed. The common intention is in the past. In their Lordships judgment, the words “common intention” signifies a common intention existing at the time when the thing was said, done or written by the one of them. Things said, done or written while the conspiracy was on foot are relevant as evidence of the common intention, once reasonable ground has been shown to believe in its existence. But it would be a very different matter to hold that any narrative or statement or confession made to a third party after the common intention or conspiracy was no longer operating and had ceased to exist is

admissible against the other party. There is then

no common intention of the conspirators to which

the statement can have reference. In their

Lordships judgment Section 10 embodies this

principle. That is the construction which has been

rightly applied to Section 10 in decisions in India,

for instance, in 55 Bom 839 and 38 Cal 169. In

these cases the distinction was rightly drawn

between communications between conspirators

while the conspiracy was going on with reference

to the carrying out of conspiracy and statements

made, after arrest or after the conspiracy has

ended, by way of description of events then past.”

On the application of Section 10 of the Evidence Act, 1872, it has been observed in the case of Bhagwan Swarup V. State of Maharashtra, AIR 1965 SC 682 as under:-

“Anything so said, done or written is a relevant fact only “as against each of the persons believed to be so conspiring as well as for the purpose of proving the existence of the conspiracy as for the purpose of showing that any such person was a party to it.” It can only be used for the purpose of proving the existence of the conspiracy or that the other party or for the purpose of showing that such a person was not a party to the conspiracy. In short, the section case be analysed as follows: (1)  there shall be a prima-facie  evidence affording a reasonable ground for the Court to believe that two or more persons are members of the conspiracy; (2) if the said condition is fulfilled, anything said, done or written by any one of them in reference to their common intention will be evidence against the other; (3) anything said, done or written by him should have been said, done or written by him after the intention was formed by any one of them; (4) it would also be relevant for the said purpose against another who entered the  conspiracy whether it was said, done or written before he entered the conspiracy or after he left it; and (5) it can only be used against a co-conspirator and not in his favour.”

Similar views have been expressed in the case of Zulfikar Ali Bhutto V. The State PLD1979 SC 53 and also in the case of State V. Nalini (1991) 5 S.C.C 283.

In the case of Moqbool Hossain Vs. The State, 12 DLR (SC) 217, the case against Moqbool Hossain rested entirely on what the other two accuseds were alleged to have stated to Tahsilder at the time of offering the bribe money to the Tahsilder for the purpose of mutating his name in the register. At the trial, those two accused repudiated their alleged statements. The question that arose was whether the statements of two co-accused were available to the prosecution against him by virtue of Sections 10 and 30 of the Evidence Act. It was laid down as follows:

“Section 10 of the Evidence Act declares that where there is reasonable ground to believe that two or more persons have conspired together to commit an offence or an actionable wrong, anything said, done or written by any one of such persons in reference to their common intention, after the time when such intention was first entertained by any one of them, is a relevant fact as against each of the persons believed to be so conspiracy as well as for the purpose of proving the existence of the conspiracy as for the purpose

of showing that any such person was a party to it. A plain reading of this section makes it clear that apart from the act or statement of the co- conspirator, some prima-facie evidence must exist of the antecedent conspiracy in order to attract Section 10. Such evidence of a pre- existing conspiracy between the appellant and the two Revenue Officer is conspicuous by its absence in this case.”

In the case of State Vs Mobile Kader reported in 67 DLR (AD)(2015) 7, it has been observed  as under:-

“Bazlu made the confessional statement after his arrest and that too after the alleged criminal conspiracy culminated with the killing of deceased. So, the confessional statement of accused-Bazlu cannot be used as evidence against Mobile Quader.”

 In the aforesaid reported case, it is further held as follows:-

“The circumstances before, during and after the occurrence about the complicity of the accused in the incident must be proved beyond shadow of doubt. The criminal responsibility for a conspiracy requires more than a merely passive attitude towards an existing conspiracy for murder. Each one of the circumstances should be proved beyond reasonable doubt.”

Accordingly once a reasonable ground exists to believe that two or more persons have conspired together to commit an offence, anything said, done or written by one of the conspirators in reference to the common intention after the common intention was first entertained, is relevant against other, not only for the purpose of proving the existence of the conspiracy but also for proving that the other person was a party to it. There can be two objections to the admissibility of evidence under Sections 10 of the Evidence Act. Firstly that the conspirator whose evidence is sought to be admitted against the co-conspirator is not confronted in court by the co-conspirator, and secondly the prosecution merely proves the existence of reasonable ground to be believed that two or more persons have conspired to commit an offence and that brings into operation the existence of agency relationship to implicate co-conspirator.

But however statement made after the conspiracy has been terminated on achieving its object or it is abandoned or it is frustrated or the conspirator leaves the conspiracy in between, is not admissible against the co-conspirator. Fixing the period of conspiracy is important as the provisions of Section 10 of the Evidence Act would apply only during the existence of the conspiracy.

It is necessary that a prima-facie case of conspiracy has to be established for application of S. 10 of the Evidence Act. The second part of S. 10 permits the use of evidence which otherwise could not be used against the accused person. It is well settled that act or action of one of the accused could not be used as evidence against the other. But an exception has been carved out in S. 10 in cases of conspiracy. The second part operates only when the first part of the Section is clearly established i.e. there must be reasonable ground to believe that two or more persons have conspired together in the light of the language of S. 120-A. It is only then the evidence of action or statements made by one of the accused could be used as evidence against the other.

Section 10 comes into play only when the court is satisfied that there is a reasonable ground to believe that two or more persons have conspired together to commit an offence. There should be, in other words, a prima-facie evidence that the person was a party to the conspiracy before his acts can be used against the co- conspirator. Once such prima-facie evidence exists, anything said, done or written by one of the conspirators in reference to the common intention, after the said intention was first entertained, is relevant against the others. It is relevant not only for the purpose of proving the existence of conspiracy, but also for proving that the other person was a party to it.

As per general principle of law, the confession of an accused recorded under section 164 of the code of criminal procedure cannot be used against the other co-accused but the same can be taken into consideration when that confession is found to have been supported by the legal evidence. But the confession of a conspirator is relevant against the co- conspirator in view of section 10 of the Evidence Act, 1872 subject to fulfilment of some terms and conditions. In criminal cases, there is no bar to convict and sentence an accused basing on confessional statement provided that the confession is true and voluntary and the same was recorded in accordance with law. However, as a precautionary measure, the veracity of confessional statement may be taken into consideration in conformity with legal evidence on record.       

    Accordingly, I am of the view that the confessional statement made by an accused can be used as evidence/relevant fact against the co-conspirators when there is a prima-facie evidence to the effect that the maker and the conspirator were parties to the conspiracy and in that case anything said, done or written by one of the conspirators during subsistence of conspiracy is evidence/relevant fact against the other conspirators as per section 10 of the Evidence Actsincesection10of the Evidence Act is an exception to general principle of law. However once it is shown that a person becomes snapped out of the conspiracy, any statement made subsequent thereto cannot be used as evidence/relevant fact against the other conspirator under Section 10 of the Evidence Act. 

During hearing of the case it is argued on behalf of the prosecution that in the instant case at hand, section 106 of the Evidence Act is applicable to the accused/convicts of this case. On the other hand, the submission on behalf the accused/convicts is that section 106 of the evidence act is not applicable to the accused/convicts.   

Section 106. Burden of proving fact especially within knowledge:- When any fact is especially within the knowledge of any person, the burden of proving that fact is upon him.

It may be mentioned that Section 106 is applicable only in exceptional cases. When it is established that an accused person has given information about an incriminating article, it is for him to explain how he got the knowledge of the place where that article was found. Similarly, the accused person and his wife were living in the same bed, the wife having received injuries on her person ultimately died of injuries, onus heavily falls on the husband as he is saddled with the burden of proving the facts especially within his knowledge and on failure to

discharge such onus, adverse presumption is bound to seize him. In the instant case, the evidence shows that the convicts/accused were present at the Pilkhana and most of them participated in Darbar at the Darbar Hall. At the time of occurrence, they also actively participated in the commission of offences. In the Pilkhana premises, army officers and the BDR soldiers would have been resided together. Apart from this, many of them made confessional statements involving  themselves with the commission of murders of the army officers and other offences and also narrated how they committed the offences giving vivid descriptions. The prosecution witnesses implicated the accused/convicts in this case. Moreover no outsiders or strangers went there to kill the army officers. Under the circumstances, onus of proof under section 106 of the Evidence Act, 1872 heavily lies on the accused/convicts to prove how the army officers were

killed at Pilkhana. Accordingly section 106 of the Evidence Act also fixes the liability of proving the facts of killing of the army officers on the accused/convicts beside the prosecution, since the same was especially within the knowledge of the accused/convicts. However, the accused/convicts have totally failed to discharge their burden of proof as to killing the army officers at Pilkhana, which also nullifies the defence case of the accused/convicts that they were not involved in the commission of murder of army officers and other offences at Pilkhana.   

Observations and Opinions

I have gone through the FIR, charge-sheet, order of framing charge, evidence of the prosecution witnesses, evidence of the defence witnesses, inquest reports, post mortem reports, material exhibits, confessional statements of the accused, 342 statements of the accused. During hearing of the death reference with connected appeals, I have also seen the video clippings recorded at the time of occurrence and after the occurrence, at the court displayed by the prosecution with regard to movements and activities of the BDR rebels and recovery of dead bodies from the mass graves. For delivery of the judgement, I have carefully perused, scrutinized, examined and weighed all the evidence and materials in proper perspective. I have also gone through the judgements proposed to be given by my learned two brothers namely Mr. Justice Md. Shawkat Hossain and Mr. Justice Md. Abu Zafor Siddique. I have also gone through the landmark and celebrated legal decisions of this sub-continent and other jurisdictions of the world referred to by the respective parties of this case. It may be mentioned that the present case is a big and voluminous case

It may be mentioned that the incident of BDR carnage happened on 25-26 February 2009 at Pilkhana has not happened suddenly. If we look back in 1991, we find many reasons behind the incident of the BDR carnage at Pilkhana in 2009. It appears from the record that the BDR soldiers had some grievances and dissatisfactions over the army officers for non- fulfilment of their demands. On 30th November 1991, 17 BDR soldiers of 1 Rifle Battalion Naogaon came to Pilkhana, Dhaka to participate in Tattoo show at the Headquarters of Bangladesh Rifles at Pilkhana, Dhaka. After performing in Tattoo show, the BDR soldiers went back to their own Battalion at 1 Rifle Battalion,  Naogaon.  In  order to fulfill  their demands, the aforesaid BDR soldiers composed leaflets and thereby published and distributed leaflets in different places of 1 Rifle Battalion, Naogaon. The main subject-matter of the leaflets, among 19 demands, was to remove the army officers from the BDR. In order to find out the real offenders, the authority upon examining the hand writing of the aforesaid 17 BDR soldiers came to a conclusion that the hand writings of Naik Md. Afzal matched with the hand writings written on the leaflets and No.26238 Naik Md. Afzal and other accomplices were the architects and perpetrators behind composing the leaflets. Thereafter the Commanding Officer (CO) of 1 Rifle Battalion, Naogaon informed the authority of Bangladesh Rifles, Headquarters, Pilkhana of the aforesaid fact. It was decided by the higher authority

that in order to find out the real causes of the incident and in order to find out the genuine offenders, Naik Afzal would be sent to Sector Headquarters, Rajshahi from 1 Rifle Battalion, Naogaon for interrogation. On 1st December 1991 at around 5:30 p.m, when as per decision of the authority, Naik Afzal was being taken to Sector Headquarters, Rajshahi by the escort party, the BDR soldiers of 1 Rifle Battalion, Naogaon taking bamboo sticks and woods obstructed the escort party from taking Naik Afzal to Sector Headquarters, Rajshahi, chanted objectionable slogans and assaulted Commanding Officer (CO) and other army officers including a guest officer. Apart from these, the BDR soldiers scolded the army officers in filthy languages, tried to loot the arms from the Kote, attacked the residences of the army officers and damaged the government properties. In the face of aforesaid incident, a court of inquiry of 4 members headed by BA-100118 Colonel Monjur Ahmed was constituted. The court of inquiry after holding thorough examination into the matter found No.26238 Naik Md. Afzal Hossain and 20 other BDR soldiers guilty for the aforesaid unbecoming incidents. The court of inquiry also recommended disciplinary action against No.26238 Naik Md. Afzal Hossain and other 20 BDR soldiers of 1 Rifle Battalion, Naogaon for their involvements and misdeeds. As per article 10A of the Bangladesh Rifles Order, 1972 if any Subordinate Officer or a Rifleman or a Signalman commits any offence like the aforesaid offences, he shall, on conviction by the Special Court, be punished with rigorous imprisonment for a term which may extend to seven years and shall also be liable to fine which may extend to Taka one hundred but the aforesaid BDR

Now I want to discuss about the Dal-Vhat programme taken by the then BDR authority, which was one of the main causes of dissatisfactions and grievances of the BDR soldiers against the army officers in BDR. I have stated earlier that the BDR carnage committed on 25-26 February 2009 at Pilkhana was not happened suddenly. There is a long chequered history behind this incident. If we look into the incident happened in 1991 at 1 Rifle Battalion, Naogaon, it is conceived that the BDR soldiers were dissatisfied with the army officers over some demands since 1991. It may be stated that after the mutiny happened in 1991 at 1 Rifle Battalion, Naogaon, the grievances and dissatisfactions of the BDR soldiers against the army officers remained in the minds of the BDR soldiers implied and they were waiting for a chance to overthrow the army officers from the BDR. In 2006, when the then Government was in power, there was a price hike of rice, flour, sugar, soya bean oil, powder milk, red lentils including many essential commodities in the market. In order to control the market, the then Government imported the aforesaid goods which were in the shortfall. Thereafter, the then Government decided to distribute the aforesaid goods to the general people through Trading Corporation of

discipline force went to different political leaders namely  PW-345 Sheik Fazlul Karim Selim MP, PW-575 Mr. Barrister Fazle Noor Tapash MP, PW-634 Post & Telecommunication Minister Adv Sahara Khatun unlawfully violating their laws with a charter of demands with a view to placing their demands to the proper authority for realisation of their demands. From the confessional statement Sepoy Kazol Ali CS accused No.11 it appears that Sepoy Moin told Sepoy Kazol Ali that they went to the residences of Home Minister and MPs but they failed to realise their demands and for that reason they had to compose leaflets and to distribute the same to the different places of the Pilkhana. Going through the evidence of PW 6 Major Rezaul Mostafa Md. Asad- Ud-Daula, PW 7 Major Tareq Md. Vawali, PW 13 Major Munshi Mahbubur Rahman and the

confessional statements of  No.44274 Havildar Md Masud Iqbal CS accused No.164, No.45596 Naik Kaiyum CS accused No.165, No.25829 Havildar Md. Yusuf Ali CS accused No.75, JCO-5046 Subedar Md. Yusuf Ali Khan RUS CS Accused No.180, it appears that on 21.02.2009, 4 leaflets were found and recovered from the different places of Pilkhana.  The leaflets were written addressing the Hon’ble Prime Minister stating some objectionable remarks against the DG and the army officers. The aforesaid posters contained, ‘DG BDR purchases precious vehicles for them but the BDR soldiers use broken vehicles, perform their duties on foot, do not get proper monies from operation Dal-Vhat programme and monies of breakfast while on duty at Bissho Estema (World Muslims congregation) as those monies were misappropriated by the army

officers’. The aforesaid leaflets contained different types of allegations against DG BDR, Colonel Mojib Sector Commander of Dhaka and wife of DG BDR including different statements with regard to non- necessity of army officers in BDR force. On getting leaflets/posters, a meeting was held at the office of Lieutenant Colonel Enshad Ibney Amin, Commanding Officer (CO) of Rifle Security Unit (RSU) and another meeting was held at the office of DG BDR at Headquarters, Pilkhana. In those meetings, DG BDR instructed to make counter leaflets containing the welfare activities in the BDR for last 3/4 years, expenditures on marriage of the children of the BDR soldiers, medical allowances, developments of treatment in the hospital, communications of BDR soldiers from the remote and inapproachable area by helicopter, distribution of money of operation Dal-

Vhat, increase of admission quotas for the children of BDR members to Pilkhana School, development of ration facilities and accommodations and purchase of new vehicles. Subsequently the BDR authority came to know that Sepoy Moin of 13 Rifle Battalion, Sepoy Selim Reza of 44 Rifle Battalion and Lance Naik Ekram of 24 Rifle Battalion composed and distributed the leaflets at Pilkhana, Dhaka. Under the aforesaid circumstances, in order to increase security, 11 Major and some DADs of BDR were posted at important establishments including quarter guard and Magazine area at Pilkhana. The aforesaid fact of composition and distribution of leaflets at the Pilkhana premises by

the BDR rebels indicates that the BDR rebels joined their hands with each other making pre-planned conspiracy in order to remove the army officers from the BDR force and the same is also conceived from the behaviours and conducts of the BDR rebels and from the objectionable languages used in the leaflets. From the leaflets, it is a reasonable ground to believe that the BDR rebels conspired together to overthrow the army officers from the BDR force and to commit other actionable wrongs if their demands are not fulfilled. Furthermore, the composition and distribution of leaflets are the outcome of the mala fide intention of the BDR rebels, which was first entertained by them before the occurrence. The aforesaid fact of composition and distribution of leaflets is a proof of conspiracy to remove the army officers from the BDR force and to commit the offence of murder and other offences if circumstances arise and the BDR rebels were parties to the conspiracy and the said offence of conspiracy is punishable under Section 120B of the Penal Code.

On perusal of the confessional statement of Sepoy Selim Reza CS accused No.6 it is found that on 23.02.2009 at around 9:00 p.m, he made a phone call to the Hon’ble Home Minister putting extra grameen sim to the mobile of No. 63922 Sepoy Kazol CS accused No.11. No.63907 Sepoy Selim Reza CS accused No.6 gave salam (salutation) to the Hon’ble Home Minister, introduced himself to her and told her that she would come at the Pilkhana tomorrow and what were being brought by her for changing the fate of the BDR members. The Home Minister replied to the effect that she would not come alone, the Hon’ble Prime Minister would also be there.

From the evidence of  PW-337 Md Shamsuzzaman @ Anu, PW 338 KM Kamrul Ahsan Shah @ Swapan, PW-576 Miraj Ahmed Razib, PW 61 No.43607 Havildar Md Ashraf Uddin and confessional statements of  No. 41584 Lance Naik Zakaria Mollah CS accused No.23, No. 63907 Sepoy Selim Reza CS accused No.6, No. 63922 Sepoy Md. Kazol Ali CS accused No.11, No.47474 Lance Naik Ekramul Islam CS accused No.35, No.56942 Sepoy Md. Habibur Rahman CS accused No.26, No.71318 Sepoy Md. Ziaul Haque CS accused No.27, it is evident that on 24.02.2009 at around 9:00 p.m, a secret meeting of the BDR personnel was held at the rented house of BDR member Zakaria Mollah near gate No.5 of Pilkhana in order to implement their evil designs. In that meeting, No. 63907 Sepoy Selim Reza CS accused No.6, No. 63922 Sepoy Md. Kazol Ali CS accused No.11, Sepoy Mizan, Sepoy Hasibul of 44 Rifle Battalion, No.47474 Lance Naik Ekramul Islam CS accused No.35 of 24 Rifle Battalion, No. 41584 Lance Naik Zakaria Mollah CS accused No.23, No.56942 Sepoy Md. Habibur Rahman CS accused No.26, Sepoy RP Reza, Sepoy Rubel, Sepoy Shahadat, Sepoy Moin of 13 Rifle Battalion, Sepoy Rahman, Sepoy Ayub, Sepoy Atiqur Rahman, Sepoy Sadullah, Sepoy Kamrul, Sepoy Masbah Uddin and 30/35 BDR soldiers were present. At that time, there was no electricity in that area. Lighting up a candle, the BDR rebels held that meeting. It was decided in that meeting that on the

Apart from this, another meeting was held on 24.02.2009 at around 10:00 p.m, at the office of Subedar Major SM Gofran Mollik of 24 Rifle Battalion, which is evident from the confessional statement of  No.65702 Sepoy Md. Emran Chowdhury CS accused No.34, runner of Lieutenant Colonel Lutfar Rahman Commanding officer of 24 Rifle Battalion, who has stated in his confession that on 24.02.2009 at 8:00 p.m he went to Shahjahanpur taking the mother-in-law of his Commanding Officer (CO). He came back therefrom at around 10:00 p.m. Thereafter he attended the meeting held at the office room of Subedar Major SM Gofran Mollik of 24 Rifle Battalion. In that meeting, he along with Subedar Major Gofran Mollik, Sepoy Azim Patwary, driver of Lieutenant Colonel Lutfar Rahman Commanding Officer (CO) of 24 Rifle Battalion, Havildar Taher and Lance Naik Karim both of 24 Rifle Battalion was present. It was decided in that meeting that in the next day, that is, on 25.02.2009 the army officers would be

It appears from the confessional statement of RDO. 133 DAD Md. Nasir Uddin Khan CS accused No.2 that he was attached with 44 Rifle Battalion as Deputy Assistant Director (DAD). On 24.02.2009 at 4:00 p.m, Sepoy Selim of 44 Rifle Battalion informed him that a meeting with regard to the demands of BDR members would be held at the field of Rifle Sports Board (RSB) at 8:00 p.m. In that meeting DAD Touhid, DAD Habib, DAD Jalil, DAD Rahim and many others would remain present. DAD Nasir was supposed to go there but he could not attend as there was a rehearsal programme for tattoo show. Moreover, on that night he was entrusted with a duty at central Magazine.        

Apart from aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, the following fact also enticed and inflamed the BDR members for which they became highly dissatisfied and furious with the army officers. It is noticeable from the confessional statement of  No. 61489 Sepoy Md. Abdul Muhit CS accused No.70 that on 24.02.2009 he was present at the parade which was arranged for observance of BDR week, 2009 as well as for the purpose of coming of the Hon’ble Prime Minister at Pilkhana. After taking salute at the parade, the Hon’ble Prime Minister did not deliver any speech in respect of the demands of the BDR members. Arising out of this matter, there was an implied dissatisfaction among the BDR soldiers. Unlike every year, the BDR soldiers were not invited with their family members and being aggrieved by the same,  No. 61489 Sepoy Md. Abdul Muhit CS accused No.70 without participating in the lunch purchased a hen and enjoyed the lunch with his family members. DG BDR misappropriated taka 600/- crore from Dal-Vhat programme. The shares of the BDR soldiers were not given to them. The officers took signature of the BDR soldiers on white papers but they

It is evident from the evidence of  PW 33 Lieutenant Colonel Md. Reazul Karim, PW 453 No.79173 Sepoy Ripon Kumar Biswas, PW 35 No- 75327 Sepoy Md. Tabbas Ali and confessional statements of Sepoy Selim Reza CS accused No.6, Sepoy Md. Sajjad Hossain CS accused No. 10, Sepoy Kazol Ali CS accused No. 11 and Sepoy Md. Rafiqul Islam CS accused No.19 that as per decision of the secret meeting held at the residence of Zakaria Mollah in the night of 24.02.2009, on 25.02.2009 in

the morning at around 7:00-7:30 a.m, the BDR rebels including Sepoy Selim Reza, Sepoy Moin, Sepoy Shahadat, Sepoy Sajjad along with 18/20 BDR rebels wearing their uniform assembled at the field of 44 Rifle Battalion. Since the attendance of the BDR rebels was poor, talking with each other they came to a decision that it was not possible to attack the Darbar Hall with such a scanty number of BDR rebels. Then they decided to attend the Darbar of DG BDR. At around 7:30 a.m, the aforesaid BDR rebels including Sepoy Selim Reza, Sepoy Moin, Sepoy Rubel, Sepoy Sazzad, Sepoy Shahadat came at Sultan Ground. At that time, Sepoy Altaf and Sepoy Habib happened to meet the aforesaid BDR rebels and wanted to know the reason of their coming from the field of 44 Rifle Battalion. Then the BDR rebels replied that since the attendance of the BDR rebels was very poor, they had comeback therefrom as it was not possible to attack the Darbar Hall with such a few number of people. After a while Sepoy Habib informed the BDR rebels that the time of Darbar was shifted and the same would be held at 9:00 a.m. instead of 8:00 a.m. After that, Sepoy Habib asked all the BDR rebels to go to the Sadar mass assuring them that he would send sufficient people there as quickly as possible. Then Sepoy Selim Reza, Sepoy Altaf, Sepoy Moin, Sepoy Habib, Sepoy Hafiz, Sepoy RP Rezaul and others went to Sadar Mess. About 30/35 BDR assembled at Sadar mess within a short period of time. Sepoy Selim Reza and Sepoy RP Rezaul told all the BDR members that all the army officers would be present at the Darbar Hall and they would realize their demands keeping the army officers under hostage. A few time later, Sepoy Selim Reza, Sepoy RP Rezaul and Sepoy Altaf

It is evident from the evidence of PW 35 Sepoy Md. Tobbas Ali that on 25.02.2009, he was on duty at the central Magazine. On that day, Havildar Habibur, Havildar Majid, Havildar Kalam, Sepoy Munnaf, Sepoy Lutfor, Sepoy Al-Amin and Sepoy Abu Bakar were also on duty with him. He was assigned to duty from 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 a.m. Handing over the charge of duty, he went to guard room for rest at 9:00 a.m. At about 9:15 a.m, 14/15 BDR rebels entered the Magazine. The BDR rebels directed him and others to open the door failing which they gave threat to kill them. Among the BDR rebels, he identified Sepoy Altaf, Sepoy Siddique and Sepoy Mizan of 44 Rifle Battalion and Sepoy Paltan Chakma and Sepoy Lutfor Alam of 24 Rifle Battalion. Before that event, DAD Miraj took the arms from the guards on duty and other guards and kept those under the lock and key. Being unarmed, he could not make any resistance to the BDR rebels. The BDR rebels took away arms and ammunitions shutting the door from the outside, while he remained inside the Magazine. He came out from the back door and found hundreds of BDR rebels who

After looting the arms and ammunitions, the BDR rebels assembled at the Sultan ground and exchanged their arms and ammunitions with each other and then they started towards the Darbar Hall. At that moment Darbar of DG was going on and during that time DG BDR delivering his speeches on Operation Dal-Vhat programme and other issues. At that time 97 officers of different ranks and around 2500/3000 BDR soldiers were present at the Darbar Hall. Suddenly, Sepoy Moin of 13 Rifle Battalion entered the Darbar Hall and pointed arms at DG BDR. Within a short span of time, Sepoy Kazol Ali of 44 Rifle Battalion following Sepoy Moin also entered the Darbar Hall with arms. On that situation, DDG Brigadier General Bari,  PW 4 Colonel Shamsul Alam Chowdhury  and other officers present over there disarmed Sepoy Moin and at one stage Sepoy Kazol managed to flee away running and opened a fire going outside the Darbar Hall through the southern gate. After hearing a sound of firing, the BDR rebels inside the Darbar Hall stood up uttering and shouting a word ‘Jago’. Thereafter the BDR members present at the Darbar Hall started leaving the Darbar Hall breaking down the glasses of the doors and windows of the Darbar Hall. On such situation, DG BDR ordered all the BDR members to remain seated and he wanted to hear their problems but the BDR members ignoring and disobeying the order of DG started leaving the Darbar Hall. In the meantime, the BDR

told the lady officers to stand up and ride on the pickup. At the order of Sepoy Wahed, the 3 lady officers embarked on the pickup. But the BDR rebels obstructed Lieutenant Colonel Lutfar, Lieutenant Colonel Robi Rahman and Major Zahid from boarding the pickup. When the pickup was started for departure Lieutenant Colonel Robi boarded the pickup. After going some paths, the BDR rebels pushed down Lieutenant Colonel Robi by beating him with rifle bats. The aforesaid fact stands supported and corroborated by the evidence of  PW 72 Major Farzana Kalam, PW 73 Colonel Yesmin Akhter, and PW 77 Major Roksana Khanom. When the officers were compelled to lie down at the road at north-west side near water fountain of the Darbar Hall the BDR rebels killed them by opening several burst- fires and fires on them. The aforesaid killing incident

has been supported and corroborated by  PW 9 Lieutenant Colonel Md. Maksudul Haque as well as Sepoy Md. Habibur Rahman CS accused No.26.

After killing the 1st group of army officers, a few minutes later, Sepoy Selim Reza of 44 Rifle Battalion again appeared near the stage and witnessing the movement of the screen of the stage, he came to know that some officers were concealed behind the screen of the stage. By using megaphone, he again ordered the army officers, that is, the another group of army officers who took shelter behind the screen of the stage and in other places to come out, rebuked them with highly objectionable filthy languages and issued threat of killing if they failed to come out. Then DG, DDG and 10/12 other officers came down from the stage. Sepoy Selim Reza further rebuked and ordered the officers to go “one by one” making a queue raising

their hands. Thereafter at around 10:45 a.m, DG and other officers, that is, the another group of army officers started going out towards the north-west side of the Darbar Hall maintaining a line. At that time Sepoy Selim Reza of 44 Rifle Battalion, Sepoy Sajjad Hossain of 13 Battalion, Sepoy Ibrahim of 44 Rifle Battalion, Sepoy Obaidul of 44 Rifle Battalion, Sepoy Rafiqul of 44 Rifle Battalion, Sepoy Emran of 24 Rifle Battalion and some other BDR rebels started going to the western side of the Darbar Hall aiming arms at the officers. At that time DAD Nasir was with the BDR rebels. As soon as the DG and others officers came out through north-west gate of the Darbar Hall, Sepoy Selim Reza, Sepoy Atoar, Sepoy Ibrahim, Sepoy Obaidul, Sepoy Rafiqul of 44 Rifle Battalion, Sepoy Sajjad of 13 Rifle Battalion, Lance Naik Ekram of 24 Rifle Battalion and other BDR rebels opened burst-fires on them as a result of which the army officers fell down on the floor receiving bullet injuries. The bodies of the army officers were riddled with a spray of bullets as a result of which all the army officers instantly succumbed to the injuries and the dead bodies were fallen scattered in and outside the Darbar Hall. At that moment, DAD Nasir of 44 Rifle Battalion was present at the place of occurrence with the BDR rebels.

It is evident from the confessional statement of Sepoy Md. Rafiqul Islam CS accused No. 19 that at the time of killing the army officers, DAD Nasir of 44 Rifle Battalion was also present there with the BDR rebels. After opening burst-fires and fires, the DG and officers fell down on the ground receiving bullet injuries. In order to ensure the death of the officers, the BDR rebels charged bayonets and kicked on the dead bodies of the officers in order to see whether the officers were alive or not. When the BDR rebels became confirmed that no officers were alive, then DAD Nasir of 44 Rifle Battalion left the place of occurrence.

It is noticeable from the confessional statement of No. 75336 Sepoy Md. Saiful Ialam CS accused No.61 that after killing the first and second group of army officers by the BDR rebels under the leadership of Sepoy Selim Reza in the aforementioned places, at around 10:45 a.m when Sepoy Md. Saiful Islam was standing beside the dead bodies of army officers at the middle place in between the fountain and north-west gate of the Darbar Hall, Sepoy Altaf of 44 Rifle Battalion called him to enter the Darbar Hall. Entering into the Darbar Hall, Sepoy Saiful stood at the north corner of the stage. At that time by using megaphone Sepoy Altaf being armed with weapon directed the army officers to come out making a line. Sepoy Altaf directed the army officers to hand over their mobile phones and thereby the army officers handed over their phone to Sepoy Saiful. Thereafter Sepoy Altaf directed the army officers to go towards the west gate of the Darbar Hall maintaining a queue. The officers were being taken towards the west gate of the Darbar Hall marching. When the army officers were going out through the west gate of the Darbar Hall, the BDR rebels under the leadership of Sepoy Altaf opened burst-fires at the officers as a result of which the army officers fell down on the ground receiving bullet injuries.

Apart from the aforesaid evidence and materials, the facts of killing of army officers are also evident from the evidence of  PW 536 Brigadier General

Waker-Uz-Zaman who has stated in his evidence that on 27.02.2009 at 10:30 a.m, this witness as Second-In- Command (2IC) of 17 East Bengal Regiment along with his brigade commander and other army officers entered the Pilkhana. He went to DG bungalow, Darbar Hall and different quarters of the officers. Going at DG bungalow and Darbar Hall, he found many alamots and marks of killing therein. However, he recorded some scenario of alamots and marks of killing of DG bungalow in his personal mobile. Subsequently, he converted those scenario into CD.

The aforesaid fact of killing has been supported and corroborated by the evidence of PW 3 Lieutenant Colonel Abu Tasnim, PW 4 Lieutenant Colonel Shamsul Alam Chowdhury, PW 5 Lieutenant Colonel Md. Abdul Mokim Sarker, PW 8 Lieutenant Colonel Md. Zahid Hasan, PW 9 Lieutenant Colonel Md. Maksudul Haque, PW 10 Major Md. Alamgir Hossain Dewan and PW 11 Major Md. Sujaul Haque. It may be mentioned that the BDR rebels during the occurrence atrociously killed 74 persons including DG BDR Major General Shakil Ahmed, DDG Brigadier General MA Bari, Major Mostafa Asaduzzaman @ Asad, Lieutenant Colonel Lutfor Rahman, Commanding Officer (CO) of 24 Rifle Battalion, Major Md. Mosharaf Hossain, Major Abu Syed Gazzali Dastogir, Doctor Major Mamun, Colonel Mojib, Lieutenant Colonel Enayet, Major Mokbul, Lieutenant Colonel Doctor Robi Rahman,  Lieutenant Colonel Enshad Ibney Amin, Lieutenant Colonel Bodrul Alam, Lieutenant Colonel Sazzad, Major Maksumul Hakim, Naznin Shakil wife of DG BDR, Lieutenant Colonel Delowar, Mrs Delowar, Maid Servant Kolpana and Gardner Firoj

rebels, that is, the accused/convicts have been inferred

from the conducts and behaviours of the accused and

from the clinching circumstance of the case. Further

the roles of the accused in using and carrying deadly

weapons at the time of occurrence, their presence at

the place of occurrence to instigate the commission of

offences by chanting different objectionable slogans

against the army officers, publication and distribution

of leaflets and posters containing the demands of BDR

members for overthrowing the army officers from the

BDR, the objectionable languages of the leaflets like

‘gvbbxq cÖavbgš¿x, Avcbvi Kv‡Q Avgv‡`i GKwU gvÎ `vex wewW Avi †_‡K †mbvevwnbxi Awdmvi Zy‡j †bIqv nDK’ | ‘†h‡nZy Mi“

evwnbxi Awdmvi Aa© wkw¶Z Zvnv‡Zv †`‡ki mevB Rv‡b| GZw`b Avgiv ˆah¨© a‡i w`‡bi A‡c¶v K‡iwQ wKš‘ eZ©gv‡b I‡`i AZ¨vPv‡ii

†kvlY Avi kvm‡bi R¡vjvq Avgv‡`i wcV †`qv‡j ‡V‡K †M‡Q|’ and ‘wewWAvi evwnbx‡Z I‡`i †`L‡Z PvBbv cÖ‡qvR‡b Av›`j‡bi gva¨g KzKz‡ii b¨vq mive|’, making conspiracy to uproot the army officers from the BDR, holding of secret meeting in different places behind the back of the authority and meeting with political leaders and journalist in clandestine manner indicate that the BDR rebels, that is, accused/convicts of the case are involved in the commission of offences of murders and other offences which are punishable under sections 302/120B/34/149/382/148/448/411 and other sections. It is now well settled that a conspiracy from its very nature is generally hatched in secrecy. It is, therefore, extremely rare that direct evidence in proof of conspiracy can be forthcoming from wholly disinterested quarters or from utter strangers. But, like other offences, criminal conspiracy can be proved by circumstantial evidence. Indeed in most cases, proof of conspiracy is largely inferential though the

inference must be founded on solid facts, surrounding circumstances, antecedents and subsequent conducts and behaviours. In fact, because of the difficulties in having direct evidence of criminal conspiracy, once reasonable ground is shown for believing that two or more persons have conspired to commit an offence, then anything done by any one of them in reference to their common intention after the same is first entertained becomes relevant according to the law of evidence for proving both conspiracy and other offences committed pursuant thereto. Apart from composing and distributing the leaflets, many accused/convicts made inculpatory confession involving themselves in the commission of murders and other offences. The prosecution witnesses disclosed their names and identities in their evidence as the accused/convicts were spotted at the place of occurrence with some roles like using and carrying deadly weapons and making some instigations to promote and accelerate the commission of offences. Besides the legal evidence, a confession can be made foundation of a conviction if it is recorded in accordance with law; if it is found true and voluntary; if it is inculpatory in nature and if on examination of the confessional statement as a whole, it is found in conformity with the legal evidence adduced by the prosecution witnesses. In the instant case at hand, the BDR rebels, that is, the accused/convicts of this case not only committed the murders, they also committed crimes against humanity by killing innocent army officers and women who were unarmed at the time of occurrence. The BDR rebels, that is, the accused/ convicts of this case by their barbarous, devilish, despotic, treacherous and ghastly offences proved that

It may be mentioned that I along with my two learned brothers have come to a unanimous decision in respect of conviction and sentence of each of the accused/convicts. However, I do agree with the observations and findings of Mr. Justice Md. Abu Zafor Siddique who with reference to the facts and circumstances of the case, evidence, confessional statements and other materials on records has elaborately discussed about the roles/activities/ conducts of the accused/convicts who participated in the commission of murders and other offences and thereby come to a conclusion giving observations and findings in respect of each of the accused. Under the circumstance, I do not like to discuss and highlight the selfsame observations and findings that have been made in the judgement delivered by Mr. Justice Md. Abu Zafor Siddique Anyway, I have only pinpointed, highlighted and focused on some important facts, evidence, confessional statements and clinching circumstance of the case in order to give some individual findings and observations of my own in respect of the roles/activities/conducts and involvements of the accused/convicts who participated in the commission of murders and other offences at the time of occurrence following pre-planned criminal conspiracy together with common intention and common object. It is crystal clear that the BDR rebels in collaboration with each other sharing their common intention and common object following a criminal conspiracy hatched in secrecy deliberately killed the army officers with a view to exterminating the army officers from the BDR and establishing their full control and supremacy over the BDR Force. No provocation, no criminal conspiracy, no dissatisfaction

Opinion:-

Considering the FIR, charge sheet, order of framing charge, direct and tangible evidence of the prosecution witnesses, evidence of the defence witnesses, inquest reports, post mortem reports, material exhibits, video clippings, confessional statements of the accused and 342 statements of the accused, the facts and circumstances of the case, legal decisions referred by the respective parties and some other landmark and celebrated legal decisions of this subcontinent and other jurisdictions of the world collected at the initiative of the court, the gravity of offences and clinching circumstances with regard to pre-planned criminal conspiracy along with common intention and common object in killing the army officers by the BDR rebels, that is, the accused/convicts of this case, participation and presence of BDR rebels with  arms, grenade, ammunitions, APC (tanks) and deadly weapons at the time of killing the army officers and at the time of commission of other offences, law and order situation of the country, protection of borders and sovereignty of the country, keeping the disciplined forces under the law and rule and command of the higher officers and authorities, protection of lives and properties of the general people, necessity of capital punishment and other punishment and existing laws of the country, we have been able to reach a unanimous decision in respect of conviction and sentence of the

Recommendations

  1.               It is the pious wish of this court that the members of the BDR (now BGB) should not carry out any activity/programme like operation Dal-Vhat which hurts the pride and self-respect of the BGB members.
  2.               This court also expects that the BGB authority should not take up any activity/programme that gradually results in degeneration of the soldierly attitude and behaviour of the BGB members.
  3.               It is also the considered view of this court that the Ministry of Home and BGB authority should provide fast decision/reply to all problems of BGB members taking the same into consideration as quickly as possible.
  1.            This is also the view of this court that the BGB would mitigate all the grievances of BGB members, if any that are still hidden at the level of officers and BGB members.
  2.            The court is of the view that the BGB authority would make quick payment of TA and DA bills if any to the BGB members which are still pending.
  3.            This court further expects that the BGB authority should consider the leave matters of the BGB members which are due to them and solve all problems relating to leave and other matters.
  4.            This court strongly feels that the BGB authority should make an inquiry into the matter by forming a prove committee as to why the Rifles Security Unit (RSU) of BDR (now BGB) failed to provide necessary information of the BDR massacres happened on 25-26 February 2009 at Pilkhana before commission of the same and they should make it public as early as possible.
  1.            This court further expects that the soldierly relationship and attitude between the officers and soldiers must be maintained giving mutual respect to each other.
  2.            This court further desires that if any soldier commits any misconduct during discharge of duties, he or she should be dealt with in accordance with law.
  3.      This court futher holds the view that in order to avoid critical situation in the discipline force, unwanted and unbecoming behaviour, conduct and language on the part of the officers and soldiers must be avoided.    
  1. This court is also of the view that the security of Kote and Magazine at Pilkhana should be and must be brought under the strict surveillance with a view to protecting them from all kinds of hazards.

          The Necessity of capital punishment

It is worthwhile to mention that many countries in the world do not approve the capital punishment as a measure to prevent and control the crime considering it uncivilised, unethical and unnecessary although it is true that the capital punishment as well as imposition of fine upon the offenders play a vital role in terms of crime prevention and reduction. About 140 countries including some developed countries of the world in the meantime have abolished the capital punishment from their judicial system claiming that the capital punishment is an act of brutality and has no positive impact on human life on the control of crime and it shows less value for human life. Some of the human rights activists regard the death penalties as violation of the people's right. However, many countries like United States, China, Japan, South Korea, India, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Sri Lanka and Indonesia still consider and provide capital punishment to the offenders of grievous nature like murder, treason, espionage, war crimes and crimes against humanity.

The criminal offences like murder, setting fire to the private and government properties, looting of arms and ammunitions from the Kote and Magazine, looting of valuable properties from the house of the army officers deputed in BDR, inhuman torture upon the officers and their family members, charging of grenade and bayonet upon the army officers and at their residences and offices, burning of dead bodies, dumping of dead bodies of army officers in mass graves and causing disappearance of evidence of offences following criminal conspiracy with common intention and common object committed by the BDR rebels in and around the Darbar Hall and in different places at Pilkhana are so alarming, dreadful, heinous, barbarous, inhuman, horrendous and brutal that the BDR rebels deserve appropriate punishment so that these sorts of  atrocious criminal offences are not repeated in future. The offences perpetrated by BDR rebels who were the members of paramilitary force, that is, the disciplined force cannot be accepted in any standards. Under the circumstances, we think that the capital punishment is a just punishment that is necessary for curbing the offences of grievous nature in the country. The capital punishment acts as a deterrent for illegal activities/offences and gives signal to the citizen of the country to follow legal activities

Appreciation for learned Attorney-General Mr. Mahbubey Alam and his team members, Government Prosecutor acted as Additional Attorney-General Mr. Mosharraf Hoosain Kazol and his team members and the learned Advocates for the convicts/accused who assisted the court to coming to a decision in this case

It is an undeniable fact that the present case is one of the biggest cases in legal history of the world in terms of number of accused and witnesses. It cannot be gainsaid that it is a most voluminous case spreading over a huge number of pages and it is a gigantic task even to read the entire volume of the case and to keep in memory such a huge volumes of evidence and materials. It was not possible on the part of the learned Judges to deliver the judgment at this stage unless the learned Attorney-General and his team members, Government Prosecutor acted as Additional Attorney- General and his team members and the learned Advocates for the convicts/accused and the court staffs would render their co-operation and assistance to the court for disposal of the case. For these reasons I want to put on records my sincere appreciation and thanks to Mr. Mahbubey Alam, the learned Attorney- General, and his team members namely Mr. K.M Zahid Sarwar, D.A.G, Mr. Biswajit Debnath, D.A.G, Mr. Bashir Ahmed, A.A.G, Mr. Gazi Md. Mamunur Rashid, A.A.G, Mr. Md. Asaduzzaman, A.A.G, Mr. Mosharraf Hossain Kazol, Government Prosecutor acted as the learned Additional Attorney-General and his team members namely Mr. Sheikh Baharul Islam, D.A.G, Mr. Monjur Mohammad Shahnewaz Tipu A.A.G, Mr. Md. Aminul Islam, A.A.G, Mr. Md. Habibur Rahman, A.A.G, Mr. A.K.M Towhidur Rahman, A.A.G, Mr. Md. Mokter Hossain, A.A.G, Mr. Md. Jalil Afrad Kabir, A.A.G  for their active participation and valuable service to the court. It may

be mentioned that Mr. Mahbubey Alam, the learned Attorney General, in spite of his busy schedule of works, attended the court with utmost sincerity and rendered legal opinions and services to this special bench for quick disposal of this case. For these reasons, I am indebted to him and his team members. The learned Attorney General by his submissions has presented the prosecution case very efficiently, competently and elaborately. The submissions of the learned Attorney General were very luminous, warm and stimulating but completely free from heat, rancour and anger. The learned Attorney General with his profound legal knowledge, expertise and legal acumen has rendered legal submissions with reference to a huge number of legal decisions from our jurisdiction and from different jurisdictions of the subcontinent and the world. The learned Attorney General very carefully presented the prosecution materials, direct and tangible evidence and the clinching circumstances with regard to pre-planned conspiracy together with common intention and common object. The submissions and the legal decisions referred by the learned Attorney General has helped us a lot in coming to a decision in this case. Mr. K.M. Zahid Sarwar, learned Deputy Attorney-General has taken us through all the prosecution materials, evidence and trial court's judgment and the argument books by providing much labour and painstaking services towards completion of hearing of the case. Mr. K.M. Zahid Sarwar showed remarkable preparation and resourcefulness in this case. The manner in which he placed the prosecution materials before the court and maintained the prosecution records is exemplary and highly appreciable. Similarly, the submissions

services of the learned advocates, which have, no doubt, helped us in coming to a decision in this case.         Expunging of remarks from the judgement passed by the learned trial judge.

I have noticed from the judgement of the trial court that the learned trial Judge made some remarks

in respect of Mr. Anisul Huq, the Government Chief Prosecutor and Mr. Mosharraf Hossain Kazol, the Government Additional Chief Prosecutor, which have detrimentally affected their reputation and social status. It may be stated that Mr. Anisul Huq as Chief Prosecutor of the State successfully, efficiently and competently conducted Bangabandhu Murder case, Jail killing case and many other important cases with reputation, dignity and honour and earned name and fame nationally and internationally. Accordingly, I am

of the view that for ends of justice, those remarks

require to be recalled and expunged. Consequently, the remarks made in the judgement passed by the learned trial judge are expunged for the greater interest of justice. It may be mentioned that the present case is a most voluminous case having a lot of papers and documents but the learned trial judge by his conscientious and meticulous analysis delivered the judgement applying his judicial mind and wisdom in a very short time, for which he deserves appreciation.        Necessity of bonus to be given to the employees who worked relentlessly for last 3 (three) years in order to bring the judgment of this case to light:

It may be mentioned that the court staffs particularly, B.O, A.B.O, P.O, Jomader (orderly), court peons, drivers and others attached with each of the Judges of the Special Bench have rendered tremendous service to this matter relating to its hearing and disposal of the case. It is a long standing practice of the subcontinent that in a sensational case having a huge volume of paper books and materials on records, the staffs of the court have to bear a lot of pressure and trouble in composing the judgment as well as in carrying the materials from court to chamber and chamber to court and sometimes from court to the residences of the learned Judges and from the residences to the court which are very painstaking job and they have to give extra energy, extra time and extra labour in doing the same after office time and in holidays. In this connection, I may refer to a decision in the case of Kasab @ Abu Mujahid V. State of Maharashtra reported in (2012)9 SCC1 wherein the court directed the Government of Maharashtra to pay a some of rupees to the learned Advocates for the appellant as token remuneration for their valuable

assistance to the court. Similar view with regard to extra benefits to the employees attached with the Judges in sensational cases was taken in the case of Mohammed Ajmal Mohammad Amir Kasab Alias Abu Mujahid Vs. State of Maharashtra reported in (2012) 9 (SCC) Supreme Court Cases 1, Para-596 (Page-217). Under the circumstance, I agree with the view taken by my brother Mr. Justice Md. Abu Zafor Siddique with regard to payment of extra benefits to the employees attached with each of the Judges of the

Special Bench.

Appreciation for journalists and medias.

We also want to put our gratitude and thanks on records for the valuable services of the medias and the esteemed journalists who by their effective and contributory roles published the authentic reports/ news on this matter including the proceedings of this court and the proceedings of the trial court, for which the people of home and abroad came to know about the killings and massacres happened on 25-26 February 2009 at Pilkhana as well as the proceedings of the courts. This court expects that the medias and the respected journalists would continue performing their duties and responsibilities for the greater interest of the country.

     (Justice Md. Nazrul Islam Talukder)

Order of the Special Bench Present:

Mr. Justice Md. Shawkat Hossain

And

Mr. Justice Md. Abu Zafor Siddique

And

Mr. Justice Md. Nazrul Islam Talukder

Hence it is ordered:-

Our short order dated 26-27th Nov, 2017 shall form part of the judgment.

In case of any discrepancy with short order, this order shall prevail.

Accordingly, the Death Reference No.58 of 2013 is accepted in part.

Criminal Appeal Nos. 70 of 2014, 169 of 2014, 545 of 2014, 750 of 2014, 751 of 2014 and 1821 of 2014 are allowed.

Criminal Appeal Nos. 7484 of 2013, 7491 of 2013, 01 of 2014, 02 of 2014, 14 of 2014, 15 of 2014, 31 of 2014, 38 of 2014, 39 of 2014, 40 of 2014, 41 of 2014, 42 of 2014, 43 of 2014, 46 of 2014, 47 of 2014, 48 of 2014, 50 of 2014, 51 of 2014, 65 of 2014, 82 of 2014, 90 of 2014, 92 of 2014, 94 of 2014, 112 of 2014, 113 of 2014, 131 of 2014, 158 of 2014, 173 of 2014, 297 of 2014, 306 of 2014, 640 of 2014, 668 of 2014, 723 of 2014, 748 of 2014, 867 of 2014, 912 of 2014, 1183 of 2014, 2650 of 2014, 2969 of 2014 and 514 of 2015 are allowed in part.

Criminal Appeal Nos. 7197 of 2013, 85 of 2014, 170 of 2014, 206 of 2014, 298 of 2014, 299 of 2014, 300 of 2014, 301 of 2014, 302 of 2014, 303 of 2014, 304 of 2014, 305 of 2014, 314 of 2014, 409 of 2014, 452 of 2014, 691 of 2014, 726 of 2014, 727 of 2014, 728 of 2014, 729 of 2014, 730 of 2014, 731 of 2014, 732 of 2014, 733 of 2014, 734 of 2014, 735 of 2014, 736 of 2014, 737 of 2014, 738 of 2014, 739 of 2014, 740 of 2014, 741 of 2014, 742 of 2014, 743 of 2014, 744 of 2014, 745 of 2014, 746 of 2014, 747 of 2014, 749 of 2014, 752 of 2014, 753 of 2014, 781 of 2014, 796 of 2014, 801 of 2014, 1023 of 2014, 1088 of 2014, 1173 of 2014, 1174 of 2014, 1175 of 2014, 1176 of 2014, 1177 of 2014, 1178 of 2014, 1179 of 2014, 1180 of 2014, 1181 of 2014, 1182 of 2014, 1184 of 2014, 1373 of 2014, 1529 of 2014, 2358 of 2014, 2359 of 2014, 2360 of 2014, 2970 of 2014, 3573 of 2014,

5992 of 2014, 7067 of 2014, 360 of 2015, 361 of 2015, 485 of 2015 and 665 of 2015 are dismissed with modification.

Criminal Appeal No.13 of 2014, 307 of 2014, the appellant No.5 in Criminal Appeal No.31 of 2014, the appellant No.12 in Criminal Appeal No.38 of 2014, the appellant No.3 in Criminal Appeal No.42 of 2014 and appellant No.3 in Criminal Appeal No.48 of 2014 are hereby abated.

Mr. Muhammad Masud -Ul-Haque, the learned Advocate has filed Criminal Appeal No.3004 of 2014 in respect of appellant Md. Abdur Rahman (Sipahi/64789). Since the appellant preferred earlier Criminal Appeal No.82 of 2014 against the same judgment and order, the subsequent Criminal Appeal No.3004 of 2014 is dismissed for non-prosecution.

Jail Appeal No.250 of 2013 is hereby abated.

Jail Appeal Nos. 204 of 2013, 205 of 2013, 206 of 2013, 207 of 2013, 208 of 2013, 209 of 2013, 210 of 2013, 211 of 2013, 212 of 2013, 213 of 2013, 214 of 2013, 215 of 2013, 216 of 2013, 218 of 2013, 219 of 2013, 220 of 2013, 221 of 2013, 222 of 2013, 223 of 2013, 224 of 2013, 225 of 2013, 226 of 2013, 227 of 2013, 228 of 2013, 229 of 2013, 230 of 2013, 231 of 2013, 232 of 2013, 233 of 2013, 234 of 2013, 235 of 2013, 236 of 2013, 237 of 2013, 238 of 2013, 239 of 2013, 241 of 2013, 242 of 2013, 243 of 2013, 244 of 2013, 245 of 2013, 246 of 2013, 247 of 2013, 248 of 2013, 249 of 2013, 253 of 2013, 254 of 2013, 256 of 2013, 257 of 2013, 258 of 2013, 259 of 2013, 260 of 2013, 261 of 2013, 262 of 2013, 263 of 2013, 264 of 2013, 265 of 2013, 266 of 2013, 268 of 2013, 269 of 2013, 270 of 2013, 271 of 2013, 272 of 2013, 273 of 2013, 274 of 2013, 275 of 2013, 276 of 2013, 277 of 2013, 278 of 2013, 279 of 2013, 281 of 2013, 282 of 2013, 283 of 2013, 284 of 2013, 285 of 2013, 287 of 2013, 288 of 2013, 290 of 2013, 291 of 2013, 293 of 2013, 295 of 2013, 297 of 2013, 298 of 2013, 299 of 2013, 301 of 2013, 302 of 2013, 303 of 2013, 304 of 2013, 305 of 2013, 306 of 2013, 307 of 2013, 308 of 2013, 310 of 2013, 311 of 2013, 312 of 2013, 313 of 2013, 314 of 2013, 315 of 2013, 316 of 2013, 317 of 2013, 318 of 2013, 319 of 2013, 320 of 2013, 321 of 2013, 322 of 2013, 323 of 2013, 324 of 2013, 325 of 2013, 326 of 2013, 327 of 2013, 328 of 2013, 329 of 2013, 330 of 2013, 331 of 2013, 332 of 2013, 333 of 2013, 334 of 2013, 335 of 2013, 336 of 2013, 337 of 2013, 338 of 2013, 339 of 2013, 341 of 2013 and 148 of 2014 are dismissed with modification.

Jail Appeal Nos. 267 of 2013, 292 of 2013, 300 of 2013, 309 of 2013, 340 of 2013 and 149 of 2014 are allowed in part.

Jail Appeal Nos. 240 of 2013, 251 of 2013, 294 of 2013 and 150 of 2014 are allowed.

The Govt. Criminal Appeal No.03 of 2014 is allowed in part.

Trial Court is directed to take necessary step to apprehend the absconding accused, confirm the death sentence and life sentence imposed upon them in no time so far as it relates to the absconding accused, namely as under:

Abs. C.S. 01 Sepoy/65140 Md. Moyeen Uddin Abs. C.S. 02 Sepoy/74041 Hasibul Hasan

Abs. C.S. 04 Sepoy/63952 Md. Rezaul Karim Abs. C.S. 05 Sepoy/61721 Paltan Chakma

Abs. C.S. 06 Sepoy/73583 Md. Mizanur Rahman

Abs. C.S. 07 Sepoy/78888 Md. Mukul Alam

Abs. C.S. 10 Sepoy/58589 Md. Baki Billah

Abs. C.S. 17 Sepoy/56787 Md. Nurul Alam

Abs. C.S. 18 Lance Naik/51148 Md. Hamidul Islam

Abs. C.S. 19 Sepoy/77867 Md. Anisur Rahman. Abs. C.S. 20 Sepoy/70498 Md. Mokbul Hossain C.S.816 (Abs. 08) Sepoy/76899 Md. Kamrul Hasan C. S. 819 (Abs. 16) Sepoy/64442 Md. Salim The trial Court is further directed to recall the warrants of arrest pending for execution against absconding accused C.S.817 (Abs. C.S. 14) Sepoy/74996 Md. Mesbah Uddin.

Let the accused-appellants whose sentences have been set aside be set at liberty at once, if not wanted in connection with any other case.

The sentence of death, in respect of whom Death Reference has been accepted, would be executed as per existing mode of execution of death sentence.

The learned Judge of the court below and the DG BGB are directed to release the materials like gold, laptops, mobile phone sets and other valuable properties which were not exhibited in this case, in favour of the owners on verification.

Let the records of the case along with a copy of the judgement and order be communicated to the concerned court below at once for information and necessary action in accordance with law.   

(Md. Shawkat Hossain, J:) (Md. Abu Zafor Siddique, J:)

(Md. Nazrul Islam Talukder, J:)