IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BANGLADESH HIGH COURT DIVISION

(CIVIL REVISIONAL JURISDICTION)

Present:

Mr. Justice Zafar Ahmed

Civil Revision No. 2818 of 2023

Mohammad Shamsuddin Koreshi and others

........ Petitioners

-Versus-

Shahajadi Koreshi and others

.... Opposite parties None.

........ For petitioners

Mr. M. Belayet Hossain, with

Mr. M. Mahmudul Hasan, Advocates

.... For opposite party Nos. 1-3

Heard and Judgment on: 04.11.2024

In  the  instant  civil  revisional  application,  this  Court  on 04.06.2023 issued a Rule calling upon the opposite party Nos. 1 to 3 to show cause as to why the judgment and order dated 13.10.2022 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, 4th Court, Chattogram in Miscellaneous Appeal No. 05 of 2019 allowing the appeal and granting ad-interim injunction in favour of the plaintiffs restraining the defendants from interfering with the peaceful possession of the plaintiffs  in  the  suit  land  described  in  schedule  1(Ka),  from dispossessing the plaintiffs from the said land, from changing the nature and character of the land in question and from transferring the

2

land to 3rd party till disposal of the suit and thereby rejecting the order No. 23 dated 07.11.2018 passed by Senior Assistant Judge, Rangunia Adalat, Rangunia Chouki,  Chattogram in Partition  Suit  No.  46 of 2017 rejecting the application for temporary injunction filed by the plaintiffs should not be set aside.

At the time of the issuance of the Rule, this Court passed an ad- interim  order  staying  operation  of  the  judgment  and  order  of injunction dated 13.10.2022 passed in the miscellaneous appeal and further  directed  the  parties  to  maintain  status  quo  in  respect  of possession and position of the suit land.

Mr. M. Belayet Hossain, the learned Advocate appearing for the opposite party Nos. 1-3, frankly and candidly submits that he has no objection to the ad-interim order of status quo passed by this Court at the time of issuance of the Rule.

In view of the submission of the learned Advocate appearing for the opposite party Nos. 1-3, the parties are directed to maintain status  quo  in  respect  of  possession  and  position  of  suit  land  till disposal of the suit.

With above observations and directions the Rule is disposed of. Send down the LCR at once.

Mazhar, BO