q¡C−L¡VÑ ®g±Sc¡l£ glj ew-35                    

h¡wm¡−cn p¤fË£j−L¡V  Ñ

q¡C−L¡VÑ ¢hi¡N Bf£m pÇf¢LÑa

®g±Sc¡l£

‡Rjvt Dhaka  498

−g±Sc¡l£ L¡kÑ¢h¢d BC−el 498 d¡l¡l Ad£−el ¢l¢ine ew

Md. Arif          B−hceL¡l£ j¡dÉj        Mr. Abdullah Al Rasel, Advocate

he¡j

The State

Mr. M. D. Rezaul Karim, D.A.G with

Ms. Farhana Afroze Runa, A.A.G

Mr. Mohammad Abdul Aziz Masud, A.A.G

Mr. Md. Shamim Khan,A.A.G

fˢafr

fËbj Bc¡ma  

jÉ¡¢SøÊV,  a¡¢lM   20 n¡¢Ù¹ J cä¡−cn

                  Present

Mr. Justice Md. Atoar Rahman                     and

Mr. Justice Md. Ali Reza

Bf£m Bc¡ma  a¡¢lM  20

KvMRcÎ ev  a¡¢lM  ‡bvU I Av‡`k  ü¡rl Av‡`‡ki µwgK bs

26.05.2024  This is an application for bail of the accused-petitioner Md. Arif under section 498 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

Mr. Abdullah Al Rasel, the learned Advocate, appearing on behalf of the accused-petitioner submits that as per the FIR 100  (one  hundred)  grams  of  heroin  have  been  recovered from the accused-petitioner which is a malafide and vexatious

implication against him.

Mr. M.D. Rezaul Karim, the learned Deputy Attorney General, appearing for the state opposes the contentions so far made by the learned Advocate for the petitioner.

Heard  the  learned  Advocate  and  the  learned  Deputy Attorney  General  and  perused  the  petition  for  bail  and  the documents annexed thereto.

−e¡V  h¡  B−c−nl  a¡¢lM  −e¡V J B−cn

œ²¢jL ew

Let a Rule be issued calling upon the opposite party to show cause as to why the accused petitioner should not be enlarged on bail in Metropolitan Sessions Case No. 1892 of 2023 arising out of Khilgaon Police Station Case No. 69 dated 25.11.2022 under serial 8 (Ga) of the table attached to section 36(1) of the j¡cLâhÉ ¢eu¿»Z BCe, 2018, now pending in the Court of Additional Sessions Judge, 3rd Court, Dhaka and/or passed such other or further order(s) as to this court may seem fit and proper.       

Pending disposal of the Rule, let the accused petitioner Md. Arif, son of Md. Mokhsedul be enlarged on ad-interim bail for 01 (one) year from date on furnishing bail bond subject to  the  satisfaction  of  the  learned  Additional  Metropolitan Sessions Judge, 5th Court, Dhaka.  

The Rule is made returnable within 04 (four) weeks from

date.

The petitioner shall put in 2(two) sets of requisites within 7 days, for service of notice of the Rule upon the opposite party in normal course as well as by registered post with A/D as per the  provisions  of  the  Supreme  Court  of  Bangladesh  (High Court  Division)  Rules,  1973.  The  office  shall  not  issue  any certified  copy  or  other  copy  of  this  order  to  the  petitioner unless requisites are put in as per the provisions of above Rules.

The court below is at liberty to cancel the bail of the petitioner  in  accordance  with  law,  if  the  privilege of  bail is misused by him in any manner.

The accused-petitioner is also directed to file affidavit of facts stating the latest position of the case if further extension of bail is needed.

Shajedul/A.B.O

âøhÉx L¡m¡ L¡¢ma A¢gp ®e¡Vl HL¢V œ²¢jL eðl Hhw m¡m L¡¢ma ®L¡VÑl Bcnl BlL¢V œ²¢jL eðl qChz       ew pfj (h¡x h¡x ®L¡x)/®i¢Vw/g-110/85-3583