দায়বর্জন বিবৃতি (DISCLAIMER)

এই ওয়েবসাইটে প্রকাশিত রায় বা আদেশ আপনি google translation এর মাধ্যমে বাংলায় দেখতে পাচ্ছেন তা সুপ্রীম কোর্ট কর্তৃক বাংলায় অনূদিত নয়। জনসাধারণের বিচার-প্রক্রিয়ায় সহজ অভিগম্যতা নিশ্চিতকরণের অভিপ্রায়ে বাংলায় অনূদিত রায়-আদেশ দেখার ব্যবস্থা রাখা হয়েছে। অনূদিত রায় বা আদেশের অনুলিপি সইমোহরী/জাবেদা নকলের (certified copy) বিকল্প হিসেবে অথবা অন্য কোন উদ্দেশ্যে ব্যবহার করা যাবে না। রায় ও আদেশ বাস্তবায়নের ক্ষেত্রে মামলার নথিতে বিধৃত মূল রায় বা আদেশ প্রণিধানযোগ্য।
Microsoft Word - Absolute with direction WP 712 of 2022

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BANGLADESH HIGH COURT DIVISION

(SPECIAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION)

Writ Petition No. 712 of 2022

In the matter of:

An application under Article 102 of the Constitution of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh

AND

In the matter of:

Md. Cherag Ali and another 

....... Petitioners -Versus-

Artha Rin Adalat No.1, Habiganj and another

…. Respondents Mr. Ruhul Quayum, Advocate

  …. For the petitioners Mr. Abdullah Al Mubin, Advocate

  …. For the respondent No. 2-Bank Mr. Pratikar Chakma, DAG with

Mr. Humayun Kabir,

Ms. Farzana Rahman Shampa, and

Ms. Afroza Nazneen Akther, AAGs

... For the State The 09th October, 2023

                 Present:

Justice Muhammad Khurshid Alam Sarkar                      &

Justice Sardar Md. Rashed Jahangir

Instant Rule was issued on 16.01.2022 in the following terms;

"Let a Rule Nisi be issued calling upon the respondents to show cause as to why respondent. No. 1 Artha Rin Adalot No. 1, Habigonj should not be directed to dispose of the application dated 12.01.2022 under Section 49(1) of the Artha Rin Adalot Ain, 2003 (Annexure-H) on the fixed date and/or pass such other or further order or orders as to this Court may seem fit and proper."


1

At the time of issuance of this Rule, an interim Order was passed in the following manner;

"Pending hearing of the Rule, let the operation of dated 12.12.2021 impugned auction notice scheduled to be held on 17.01.2022 published in the Daily Habigonj er Mukh (Annexure-F) be stayed for a period of 03 (three) months from date."

Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, by filing an affidavit, the learned Advocate for the respondent No.2-lender Bank submits that the lender Bank is an agreement with the request of the petitioner to the effect that the petitioner shall pay off the total dues in equal 4 (four) installments as per Section 49 of the Artha and Rin Adalat Ain, 2003 and prays that instead of hearing of this matter at length, if this Rule is made absolute then, there will be an effective disposal of this Rule.

In view of the fact that both the parties of the Suit have come to an agreement to settle the dispute out of Court amicably and this application has been filed by the respondent No.2-lender Bank praying for making the Rule absolute, therefore, this Court is of the view that if this Rule is made absolute with certain directions then, there will be an effective disposal of this Rule.

In the result, the instant Rule is made absolute, with the following directions;

  1.                The petitioner is directed to pay off the decreetal amount in 4 (four) equal installments within 1 (one) year from the date of receipt of this Order i.e. the petitioner must pay each of the installments before expire of 03 (three) months, first installment of which must be paid within next 03 (three) months i.e. on or before 10.01.2024.
  1.              In any case, if the petitioner fails to pay one installment as per stipulations made hereinabove, the execution Court shall be competent to proceed with the execution process.

Communicate this Order at once.

Sardar Md. Rashed Jahangir, J

I agree.