দায়বর্জন বিবৃতি (DISCLAIMER)

এই ওয়েবসাইটে প্রকাশিত রায় বা আদেশ আপনি google translation এর মাধ্যমে বাংলায় দেখতে পাচ্ছেন তা সুপ্রীম কোর্ট কর্তৃক বাংলায় অনূদিত নয়। জনসাধারণের বিচার-প্রক্রিয়ায় সহজ অভিগম্যতা নিশ্চিতকরণের অভিপ্রায়ে বাংলায় অনূদিত রায়-আদেশ দেখার ব্যবস্থা রাখা হয়েছে। অনূদিত রায় বা আদেশের অনুলিপি সইমোহরী/জাবেদা নকলের (certified copy) বিকল্প হিসেবে অথবা অন্য কোন উদ্দেশ্যে ব্যবহার করা যাবে না। রায় ও আদেশ বাস্তবায়নের ক্ষেত্রে মামলার নথিতে বিধৃত মূল রায় বা আদেশ প্রণিধানযোগ্য।
Microsoft Word - W.P. No. 4238 of 2021 _LST_.docx

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BANGLADESH HIGH COURT DIVISION

(SPECIAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION)

Writ Petition No. 4238 of 2021.

IN THE MATTER OF:

An application under Article 102 of the Constitution of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh.

-And-

IN THE MATTER OF:

Md. Mafiz Uddin and others

…Petitioners

-V E R S U S-

Land Survey Tribunal, Kurigram and others.

                                             …....Respondents No one appears

        …..For the petitioners Mr. Md. Asaduzzaman Ansari, Advocate

... ... For the respondents No.4-5. Mr. Sk. Shaifuzzaman, DAG with

Ms. Rehana Sultana, AAG and

Mr. Md. Salim Azad, AAG and

Mr. Md. Samiul Alam Sarkar, AAG and

Ms. Zulfia Akhter, AAGs

                           …. For the respondents

Present:

Mr. Justice K.M. Kamrul Kader

And

Mr. Justice Khizir Hayat

Heard and Judgment On: 16.11.2023.

K. M. Kamrul Kader, J :

On an application under Article 102 of the Constitution of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh this Rule Nisi was issued on 27.04.2021, in the following terms:

“Let a Rule Nisi be issued calling upon the respondents to show cause as to why the judgment and decree dated 27.10.2020 (decree signed on 01.12.2020) passed by the learned Judge, Land Survey Tribunal, Kurigram in Land Survey Tribunal Suit No.4

of 2019 dismissing the suit (Annexure-B and B-1) should not be declared to have been passed without lawful authority and is of no legal effect and/or such


1

other or further order or orders pass as to this Court may seem fit and proper.”

This Rule Nisi was issued on the ground that the Government has not yet been established any Land Survey Appellate Tribunal under Section 145B of the SAT Act. Due to this reason, the petitioners have failed to redress their grievance by filing appeal against the order, judgment and decree passed by the concerned Tribunal.

Mr. Sk. Shaifuzzaman, learned Deputy Attorney General submits that the government has already been published Gazette for establishing Land Survey Appellate Tribunal in different districts and the petitioners of the writ petition may redress their grievances by filing appeal, before the respective Land Survey Appellate Tribunal of the respective districts and as such, he prays for discharging the Rule.

It appears that in the meantime, the Government has already established the Land Survey Appellate Tribunal in the respective districts vide Gazette notification dated 11.07.2023 to hear the appeal arising out of judgment and decree and/or order of the Land Survey Tribunal in different districts. Considering the facts and circumstances of the matter, we are of the view that the petitioners may redress their grievances by filing appeal, before the Land Survey Appellate Tribunal, Kurigram  and as such, the Rule issued by this Court has became infructuous.

In the result, the Rule is discharged without any order as to costs. The petitioner is at liberty to prefer appeal within 03(three) months from the date of receipt of the order, if any, before the Land Survey Appellate Tribunal, Kurigram and in preferring such appeal delay occurred, if any, shall be condoned. 

 In the meantime, the order of status quo granted at the time of issuance of the Rule shall continue till filling of the appeal before the Land Survey Appellate Tribunal or 03(three) months from the date of receipt of this order, whichever is earlier.

Communicate the judgment and order at once.

Khizir Hayat, J:

I agree.