œ²¢jL ew  a¡¢lM  −e¡V J B−cn

h¡wm¡−cn p¤fË£j ®L¡VÑ

q¡C−L¡VÑ ¢hi¡N (®g±Sc¡l£ Bf£m A¢d−rœ) Ef¢ÙÛax

¢hQ¡lf¢a Se¡h ®j¡x Bnl¡g¥m L¡j¡m −g±Sc¡l£ Bf£m ew 580/1992

                              −j¡x −j¡M−mp¤l lqj¡e ----p¡S¡fË¡ç-Bf£mL¡l£z

-he¡j-

l¡øÊ

------fТah¡c£ HÉ¡X−i¡−LV Ef¢ÙÛa e¡Cz

---p¡S¡fË¡ç-Bf£mL¡l£ f−rz

 HÉ¡X−i¡−LV −j¡x e¤lEp p¡¢cL ®Q±d¤l£, ®Xf¤¢V HÉ¡Ve£Ñ ®Se¡−lm

pw−N 

HÉ¡X−i¡−LV m¡L£ −hNj, pqL¡l HÉ¡Ve£ ®Se¡−lm   

         HÉ¡X−i¡−LV ®gl−c±p£ Bš²¡l, pqL¡l£ HÉ¡Ve£Ñ ®Se¡−lm              ------l¡øÊf−rz

öe¡e£l Hhw l¡u fËc¡−el a¡¢lMx 02.08.2023z

¢hQ¡lf¢a Se¡h ®j¡x Bnl¡g¥m L¡j¡mx

         ¢h‘  ¢hi¡N£u  ¢h−no  SS,  l¡Sn¡q£  ¢hi¡N,  l¡Sn¡q£ LaѪL  ¢h−no  j¡jm¡  ew- 06/1988 (¢pl¡SN”)-H cä¢h¢d 409 avpq 1947 p¡−ml c¤e£Ñ¢a fË¢a−l¡d BC−el d¡l¡ 5(2) d¡l¡l Afl¡−d Bp¡j£ −j¡x ®j¡M−mp¤l lqj¡e−L ®c¡o£ p¡hÉÙ¹ L−l Eš² d¡l¡l Afl¡−d 05 (fy¡Q) hvpl pnËj L¡l¡cä Hhw 1,47,300/- (HL mr p¡aQ¢õn q¡S¡l ¢aena) V¡L¡ S¢lj¡e¡ Ae¡c¡−u 05 (fy¡Q) j¡−pl pnËj L¡l¡cä fËc¡−el ¢hNa Cw−lS£ 02.06.1991 a¡¢l−Ml l¡u J cä¡−c−nl ¢hl¦−Ü Aœ Bf£mz  

Bp¡j£-A¡f£mL¡l£ f−r ¢h‘ HÉ¡X−i¡−LV Ae¤f¢ÙÛaz

Afl¢c−L, l¡øÊ-¢hh¡c£ f−r ¢h‘ ®Xf¤¢V HÉ¡Ve£Ñ ®Se¡−lm É H¡X−i¡−LV ®j¡x e¤lEp p¡¢cL −Q±d¤l£ ¢hÙ¹¡¢lai¡−h k¤¢š²aLÑ EfÙÛ¡fe L−lez

Aœ ®g±Sc¡l£ A¡f£−ml clM¡Ù¹ Hhw eb£ fkÑ¡−m¡Qe¡ Llm¡jz l¡øÊf−r ¢h‘ ®Xf¤¢V HÉ¡Ve£Ñ ®Se¡−lm HÉ¡X−i¡−LV ®j¡x e¤lEp p¡¢cL −Q±d¤l£ Hl k¤¢š²aLÑ nÐhZ Llm¡jz

œ²¢jL ew  a¡¢lM  −e¡V J B−cn

…l¦aÄf§ZÑ ¢hd¡u ¢hi¡N£u ¢h−no SS, l¡Sn¡q£ ¢hi¡N, l¡Sn¡q£ LaѪL ¢h−no

j¡jm¡ ew 06/1988-H ¢hNa Cw−lS£ 02.06.1991 a¡¢l−Ml l¡u ¢e−jÀ A¢hLm Ae¤¢mMe q−m¡x

“The  Prosecution  case  in  short  in  that  accd. Mokhlesur Rahman was the Chairman of the project for the construction of the road running from Rehai-muribare to Bhtua and that for this purpose he lifted 3,300 mds. of wheat  on  3  different  instalments;  and  that  with  this amount he performed the wor counting to 16.98.120cft, attracting 2250 mds. of wheat misappropriating the rest i.s. 1050 mds. worth of Tk. 1,47,300 and hence the case.         To  this  effect  the  Chairman,  Upazilla  parishad Serajgonj sent a memo to the D.A.C.C. Serajgonj.

      The D.A.C.O. Serajgonj on receipt of the complaint, held  preliminary  inquiry  through  (illegible)  Mr.  Zaid hossain.

Mr. Zaid Hossain inquired into the matter, seized relevant papers and that there from found the basis of allegation against the accused; and that in the result he lodged F.I.R. as an informant.

After  the  lodging  of  the  F.I.R.  A.I.  Mr.  Zaid Hossain was transferred alsewhere and that as a result of it the case was entrusted with Inspector Mr. Sajahan Ali for investigation. 

         Inspector, Mr. Shajahan Ali investigated the case examined the available witnessess; (illegible) the papers seized; and that finding the from a (illegible) submitted charge-sheet.

        After the submission of charge-sheet the case was sent to the learned Senior Special Judge, Sirajgonj who after taking cognizance transferred the case to this court of trial.

         The  court  on  receipt  of  the  case  record  framed

œ²¢jL ew  a¡¢lM  −e¡V J B−cn

accusation against the accd. u.s. 409 of the Penal Code R/W sec. 5(2) of Act II/47 in absentia complying the process of law.

         The court thereafter, took up the case for recording deposition.

        The prosecution in order to prove its case examined 4 witnesses.

Points for determination:

1.    Has the charge leveled against the accd. been proved?
2.    Has the accd. misappropriated Tk. 1,47,300.00 out of the disputed project without performing the work of the wheat counting to 1050 mds? Findings and decision:

        Amongst the witnesses examined by the prosecution P.W. 1 is Mr. Shahjahan Ali who investigated the case. As  per  P.W.  1  his  predecessor  Inspector,  Mr.  Zaid Hossain at the time of preliminary inquiry seized the list of the project committee, project pro-forma, agreement, allotment letter, requisition letter measurement book, post work  measurement  sheet,  mustar-roll,  reminder  letter, Note-sheet,  closure  report,  a  letter,  D.O.S.  by  way  of seizure list marked exts. 6. 7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17 & 18. As per P.W. 1 the accused lifted 3,300 mds. of wheat for the project; and that with this amount of wheat he performed the work counting to 16,98,120 cft. which attracted 2250 mds. of wheat leaving 1050 mds. with the accused P.W. 1 proved the ajahar and the signature of Inspector  Mr.  Zaid  Hossain  whom  he  succeeded  at Serajgonj.  As  par  P.W.  1  he  investigated  the  case examined the available witnesses and that finding there from a prima facie case submitted charge-sheet.           P.W. 2 is Abu Said Md. Entazul Islam, According to  whom  the  accd. was  the  Chairman  of  the  disputed

œ²¢jL ew  a¡¢lM  −e¡V J B−cn

project; and that for the project 3,300 mds. of wheat was lifted. Sub-Asstt. Engineer was in charge of work. The Sub-Asstt.  Engineer  submitted  his  report  after measurement.  P.W.  2  proved  the  measurement  report submitted by sub-asstt. Engineer. According to P.W. 2 as per the report of the sub-asstt. Engineer measuring the work  of  the  project  found  the  work  of  the  project measuring 16,89,120 cft. As per measurement report of the sub-asstt. Engineer the wheat spent for the project was 2250  mds.  The  accd.  submitted  muster-roll  for  this amount of wheat. P.W. 2 proved the signature of the accd. put on the muster-roll. Moreso, he proved the signature of the accd. put on the (illegible) lifting the wheat.

          P.W. 3 is Md. Lutfar Hossain who used to held the supervisory work of the project. According to him, on measurement he found 16,89,120 cft. work of the project for which 2250 mds. of wheat was spent. P.W. 3 proved the measurement book prepared by Abdur Rahman.

         P.W. 4 is Md. Nural islam who is a formal witness of this case in whose presence the relevant papers of the project  from  the  office  of  the  U.N.O.  Kazipur  were seized. P.W. 4 proved the seizure list and his signature put thereon.

       In this case the P.W.s examined by the prosecution stated in a tune that for the disputed project accd. lifted 3300 mds. of wheat in 3 different installments and that out of this wheat he spent 2250 mds. performing a total work measuring to 16,89,120 cft. misappropriating 1050 mds. worth of Tk. 147300.00. The version of the P.Ws. examined by the prosecution has not been controverted nor  there  is  any  justifiable  reason  to  disbelieve  their statement. Moreso, the measurement report marked ext. 12  of  the  disputed  work  discloses  that  the  accd. performed  16,98,120  cft.  of  earth  work  attracting  the

œ²¢jL ew  a¡¢lM  −e¡V J B−cn

expenses  of  wheat  to  the  tune  of  2250  mds. misappropriating 1050 mas. of wheat. This measurement report of the disputed project has been substantiated by P.Ws. 2 & 3 who took the measurement of the work. According to P.Ws. 2 & 3 they took the measurement of the  work  and  found  16,98,120  cft.  earth  work  which required 2250 mds. of wheat, while the accd. lifted 3300 mds. Thus according to the P.Ws. 2 & 3, the accd. lifted 3300 mds. out of which he did the work of 2250 mds. misappropriating  1050  mds.  Moreso,  the  muster-roll submitted by the accd. also discloses that he performed the work measuring 2250 mds. Since the muster-roll and the measurement reported tagged with oral statement of the witnesses examined by the prosecution corroborates that the accd. lifted 3300 mds. of wheat for the disputed project and that out of this he spent 2250 mds. of wheat for  the  project,  it  is  well  proved  that  the  accd. misappropriated  1050  mds.  of  wheat  worth  of  Tk. 1,47,300.00 and hence.

ORDERED

       That the charge levelled against accd. Mokhlesure Rahman u.s. 409 of the Penal Code R/W sec. 5(2) of Act II/47 has been proved and hence he be convicted and sentenced to suffer R.I. for 5(five) years with a fine of Tk.1,47,300.00  (one  lac  forty  seven  thousand  three hundred)  in  default  to  suffer  R.I.  for  5  (five)  months finding him guilty under the section in absentia.

        The order of conviction and sentence will run for the date of his arrest.

      Let a copy of the judgment be sent to D.M. Serajgonj for realisation of fine and sent the same to the concerned department, if realised.

      Let a copy of the judgment be sent to D.M. & S.P. serajgonj for execution of the order of conviction and

œ²¢jL ew  a¡¢lM  −e¡V J B−cn

sentence passed against the accused.

Issue warrant accordingly.

sd/-Abdul Matin 02.06.91

Divisional Special Judge, Rajshahi, Division, Rajshahi.

fË¢p¢LEne f−rl pLm ü¡r£N−Zl p¡rÉ p¢hÙ¹¡−l fkÑ¡−m¡Qe¡u fÐa£uj¡e ®k, pLm p¡rÉNe flØfl flØfl−L pjbÑe L−l hš²hÉ fËc¡e L−l fË¢p¢LEne f−rl A¢i−k¡N p−¾cq¡a£ai¡−h fËj¡Z Ll−a prj q−u−Rez ¢hQ¡¢lL Bc¡m−al l¡u fkÑ¡−m¡Qe¡u ®L¡e fËL¡l œ²¢V ¢hQɤ¢a f¢lm¢ra qu e¡z ¢h‘ ¢hQ¡¢ L Bc¡m−al l¡u J cä¡−cn p¢WL Hhw eÉ¡u¡e¤N q−u−Rz Aœ Bf£m¢V e¡j”¤l ®k¡NÉz

AaHh, B−cn qu ®k, Aœ Bf£m¢V e¡j”¤l Ll¡ q−m¡z

¢h‘ ¢hi¡N£u ¢h−no SS, l¡Sn¡q£ ¢hi¡N, l¡Sn¡q£ LaªÑL ¢h−no ®j¡LŸj¡ ew- 6/1988 (¢pl¡SN”)-H fËcš ¢hNa Cw−lS£ 02.06.1991 a¡¢l−M l¡u J cä¡−cn Haà¡l¡ hq¡m l¡M¡ q−m¡z

Aœ l¡u J B−c−nl Ae¤¢m¢f fË¡¢çl 30(¢œn) ¢c−el  −dÉ Bp¡j£-Bf£mL¡l£−L ¢h‘  ¢hQ¡¢lL  Bc¡m−a  BaÈpjfÑ−el  ¢e−cÑn  fËc¡e Ll¡  q−m¡z  hÉbÑa¡u  ¢h‘  ¢hQ¡¢lL Bc¡ma Bp¡j£−L ®NËga¡−ll fË−u¡Se£u fc−rf NËqe Ll−hez

Aœ l¡−ul Ae¤¢m¢fpq AdÙ¹e Bc¡m−al e¢b pw¢nÔø Bc¡m−a â¦a ®fËlZ Ll¡ qELz

(¢hQ¡lf¢a ®j¡x Bnl¡g¥m L¡j¡m)

œ²¢jL ew  a¡¢lM  −e¡V J B−cn