দায়বর্জন বিবৃতি (DISCLAIMER)

এই ওয়েবসাইটে প্রকাশিত রায় বা আদেশ আপনি google translation এর মাধ্যমে বাংলায় দেখতে পাচ্ছেন তা সুপ্রীম কোর্ট কর্তৃক বাংলায় অনূদিত নয়। জনসাধারণের বিচার-প্রক্রিয়ায় সহজ অভিগম্যতা নিশ্চিতকরণের অভিপ্রায়ে বাংলায় অনূদিত রায়-আদেশ দেখার ব্যবস্থা রাখা হয়েছে। অনূদিত রায় বা আদেশের অনুলিপি সইমোহরী/জাবেদা নকলের (certified copy) বিকল্প হিসেবে অথবা অন্য কোন উদ্দেশ্যে ব্যবহার করা যাবে না। রায় ও আদেশ বাস্তবায়নের ক্ষেত্রে মামলার নথিতে বিধৃত মূল রায় বা আদেশ প্রণিধানযোগ্য।

In the Supreme Court of Bangladesh

High Court Division

(Civil Revisional Jurisdiction)

Present:

Mr. Justice Md. Zakir Hossain

Civil Rule No.860 (Con) of 2022

In the matter of:

An application under Section 5 of the Limitation Act, 1908.

-And-

In the matter of: Moriom Bewya and others.

.......Petitioners -Versus-

Md. Idris Ali

.......Opposite party

         Mr. Md. Asadur Rahman, Advocate

.......For the petitioners

Heard and Judgment on: 11.07.2024

Md. Zakir Hossain, J:

At the instance of the petitioners, the Rule was issued by this Court

with the following terms:

“Let a Rule be issued calling upon the opposite party to show cause as to why the delay of 239 days should not be condoned in filling revisional application against the judgment and decree dated 24.11.2021 (decree being drawn on 01.12.2021) passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Sherpur in Other Class Appeal No.07 of 2020 and/ or such other or further order or orders passed as to this Court may seem fit and proper.”

Challenging the legality and propriety of the judgment and decree dated 24.11.2021 passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Sherpur in Other Class Appeal No.07 of 2020 affirming the judgment and decree dated


-2-

27.10.2019 passed by the learned Senior Assistant Judge, Sherpur in Other Class  Suit  No.373  of  2011,  the  petitioners  were  constrained  to  file  an application under Section 115(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure.  

Being aggrieved by and dissatisfied with the aforesaid said judgment and decree of the appellate Court, the petitioner moved this Court along with the petition for condonation of delay of 239 days and obtained the aforesaid Rule.

Heard and perused the materials on record with care and due attention. On meticulous consideration of the petition, it transpires that the petitioners have reasonably and sufficiently explained the cause of delay; therefore, I am inclined to condone the same. Consequently, the Rule deserves to be made absolute to secure the ends of justice.

In the result, the Rule is made absolute, however, without passing any order as to costs.

The delay of 239 days in filing the revisional application is hereby condoned.

The office is hereby directed to place the revisional application to the concerned Bench within 10(ten) days from the date of receipt of the record of this case. 

(Md. Zakir Hossain, J)

Awal/ ABO