দায়বর্জন বিবৃতি (DISCLAIMER)

এই ওয়েবসাইটে প্রকাশিত রায় বা আদেশ আপনি google translation এর মাধ্যমে বাংলায় দেখতে পাচ্ছেন তা সুপ্রীম কোর্ট কর্তৃক বাংলায় অনূদিত নয়। জনসাধারণের বিচার-প্রক্রিয়ায় সহজ অভিগম্যতা নিশ্চিতকরণের অভিপ্রায়ে বাংলায় অনূদিত রায়-আদেশ দেখার ব্যবস্থা রাখা হয়েছে। অনূদিত রায় বা আদেশের অনুলিপি সইমোহরী/জাবেদা নকলের (certified copy) বিকল্প হিসেবে অথবা অন্য কোন উদ্দেশ্যে ব্যবহার করা যাবে না। রায় ও আদেশ বাস্তবায়নের ক্ষেত্রে মামলার নথিতে বিধৃত মূল রায় বা আদেশ প্রণিধানযোগ্য।
Microsoft Word - W.P. 4787 of 2001 Jana Nirapotta

In the Supreme Court of Bangladesh High Court Division

(Special Original Jurisdiction)

Present:

Mr. Justice Mustafa Zaman Islam

And

Mr. Justice Md. Atabullah

Writ Petition no. 4787 of 2001.

In the matter of:

An application under Article 102 read with Article 44 of the Constitution of People’s Republic of Bangladesh.

In the matter of: Abdullah Hashem

…....... petitioner.

              -Versus-

Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Law and Parliamentary Affairs, Bangladesh Secretariat, Ramna, Dhaka and others

………. Respondents. No one appears,

              ....... For the petitioner.

Mr. Tushar Kanti Roy, D.A.G. with Mr. Md. Salim Azad. and

Ms. Anis-ul Mawa, A.A.G.

                   ..... For the Respondents.

Heard and Judgment

delivered on: 28.02.2024.

Mustafa Zaman Islam, J:

By this Rule, the petitioner by filing an application under Article 102 read with Article 44 of the Constitution of People’s


Page # 1

Republic of Bangladesh, the petitioner obtained this Rule Nisi calling upon the respondents to show cause as to why the Public Safety Act, 2000 should not be held to be unconstitutional and void as being violative of the fundamental rights of the petitioner guaranteed by Articles 27, 31, 32 and 35 of the Constitution and/or such other or further order or orders passed as to this court may seem fit and proper.

Since a challenge against the Jana Nirapatta Ain, 2000 has ended in a dissenting judgment except on section 16 and 18(1)(Kha) of the Act, let petitioner be released on ad-interim bail to the satisfaction of the Deputy Commissioner, Dhaka in Mohammadpur Police Station case no. 03 dated 01.07.2001 corresponding to G.R. No. 2417 of 2001 under sections 4/9/12 of the Jana Nirapatta (Bishesh Bidhan) Ain, 2000 now pending in the Court of learned Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Dhaka.

The police report has not been yet submitted.

Feeling aggrieved the petitioner preferred the instant Writ Petition and obtained the present Rule.

No one appears on behalf of the petitioner to support the Rule.

The learned Deputy Attorney General appearing on behalf of the respondents.

In order to appreciate his submissions we have gone through the record and given our anxious consideration to his submissions.

On going to the materials on record it transpires that the case was lodged under sections 4/9/12 of the Jana Nirapatta (Bishesh Bidhan) Ain, 2000.

It is pertinent to point out that the Se¢el¡fJ¡ (¢h­no ¢hd¡e) BCe, 2000 was repealed vide Act no. VI of 2002 dated 2nd April, 2002. Therefore, the instant proceeding has no legal force. 

In view of foregoing narrative the Rule is disposed of. The proceeding of Mohammadpur Police Station case no. 03 dated 01.07.2001 corresponding to G.R. No. 2417 of 2001 under sections 4/9/12 of the Jana Nirapatta (Bishesh Bidhan) Ain, 2000 now pending in the Court of learned Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Dhaka is hereby quashed.

The office is directed to communicate the judgment and order at once.

  Mustafa Zaman Islam Md. Atabullah, J:

 I agree.

Md. Atabullah