q¡C−L¡VÑ ®g±Sc¡l£ glj ew-35                    

h¡wm¡−cn p¤fË£j−L¡V  Ñ

q¡C−L¡VÑ ¢hi¡N Bf£m pÇf¢LÑa

®g±Sc¡l£

‡Rjvt Bagerhat  498

−g±Sc¡l£ L¡kÑ¢h¢d BC−el 498 d¡l¡l Ad£−el ¢l¢ine ew

Md. Abdul Halim Mridha          B−hceL¡l£ j¡dÉj        Ms. Tapati Das, Advocate

he¡j

The State

Mr. M. D. Rezaul Karim, D.A.G with

Ms. Farhana Afroze Runa, A.A.G

Mr. Mohammad Abdul Aziz Masud, A.A.G

Mr. Md. Shamim Khan,A.A.G

fˢafr

fËbj Bc¡ma  

jÉ¡¢SøÊV,  a¡¢lM   20 n¡¢Ù¹ J cä¡−cn

                  Present

Mr. Justice Md. Atoar Rahman                     and

Mr. Justice Md. Ali Reza

Bf£m Bc¡ma  a¡¢lM  20

KvMRcÎ ev  a¡¢lM  ‡bvU I Av‡`k  ü¡rl Av‡`‡ki µwgK bs

04.06.2024  This is an application for bail of the accused-petitioner

Md. Adbul Haim Mridha under section 498 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

Ms. Tapati Das,  the learned Advocate, appearing on behalf of the accused-petitioner submits that as per the FIR 45 (forty five) pieces of yaba tablets (4.5 grams)  have been recovered from the accused-petitioner which is a malafide and vexatious implication against him.

Mr. M.D. Rezaul Karim, the learned Deputy Attorney General, appearing for the state opposes the contentions so far made by the learned Advocate for the petitioner.

Heard  the  learned  Advocate  and  the  learned  Deputy Attorney  General  and  perused  the  petition  for  bail  and  the documents annexed thereto.

−e¡V  h¡  B−c−nl  a¡¢lM  −e¡V J B−cn

œ²¢jL ew

Let a Rule be issued calling upon the opposite party to show cause as to why the accused petitioner should not be enlarged on bail in Morelganj Police Station Case No. 8 dated 04.05.2024 corresponding to G.R. No. 141 of 2024 under serial 10 (ka) of the table attached to section 36(1) of the j¡cLâhÉ ¢eu¿»Z BCe, 2018, now pending in the Court of Chief  Judicial  Magistrate,  Bagerhat  and/or  passed  such other or further order(s) as to this court may seem fit and proper.       

Pending disposal of the Rule, let the accused petitioner Md. Abdul Halim Mridha, son of Md. Dhalu Mridha be enlarged on ad-interim  bail  for  01  (one)  year from  date  on furnishing bail bond subject to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bagerhat.  

The Rule is made returnable within 04 (four) weeks from date.

The petitioner shall put in 2(two) sets of requisites within 7 days, for service of notice of the Rule upon the opposite party in normal course as well as by registered post with A/D as per the  provisions  of  the  Supreme  Court  of  Bangladesh  (High Court  Division)  Rules,  1973.  The  office  shall  not  issue  any certified  copy  or  other  copy  of  this  order  to  the  petitioner unless requisites are put in as per the provisions of above Rules.

The court below is at liberty to cancel the bail of the petitioner  in  accordance  with  law,  if  the  privilege of  bail is misused by him in any manner.

The accused-petitioner is also directed to file affidavit of facts stating the latest position of the case if further extension of bail is needed.

Shajedul/A.B.O

âøhÉx L¡m¡ L¡¢ma A¢gp ®e¡Vl HL¢V œ²¢jL eðl Hhw m¡m L¡¢ma ®L¡VÑl Bcnl BlL¢V œ²¢jL eðl qChz       ew pfj (h¡x h¡x ®L¡x)/®i¢Vw/g-110/85-3583