q¡C­L¡VÑ ®g±Sc¡l£ glj ew-35   +

20

h¡wm¡­cn p¤fË£j­L¡  VÑ

q¡C­L¡VÑ ¢hi¡N

Bf£m pÇf¢LÑa

­g±Sc¡l£

­Sm¡: Jashore  ­g±Sc¡l£ L¡kÑ¢h¢d BC­el 435 d¡l¡l Ad£­el ¢l¢ine

ew

Md. Hasan Miah  B­hceL¡l£

j¡dÉj        Mr. Mohammad Jahangir Alam, Advocate

he¡j

The State and another

Ms. Shiuli Khanom, D.A.G along with

         Mr. S.M. Emamul Musfiqur, A.A.G

         Mr. Md. Humayun Karim Siddique, A.A.G

fˢafr

fËbj Bc¡ma

jÉ¡¢S­øÊV,  a¡¢lM   20 n¡¢Ù¹ J cä¡­cn

Present

Mr. Justice Md. Khairul Alam

Bf£m Bc¡ma   a¡¢lM   20

L¡NSfœ h¡ B­c­nl  a¡¢lM  ­e¡V Hhw B­cn  ü¡rl

œ²¢jL ew

02.12.2024  In  preferring  the  Criminal  Revision  under  section  439  read  with

section 435 of the Code of Criminal Procedure there had been a delay of 110 days for which the petitioner filed an application under section 5 of the Limitation Act.   

        Considering the facts and circumstances, the delay of 110 days in filing the revision is hereby condoned.                   

         Let records be called for and realization of fine be stayed.

        Let a rule be issued calling upon the opposite party to show cause as to why the judgment and order dated 30.05.2024 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, 6th Court, Jashore in Criminal Appeal No. 55 of 2024 dismissing the appeal and thereby affirming the judgment and order of  conviction  and  sentence  dated  21.12.2023  passed  by  the  learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jashore (In Charge) in G.R. Case No. 730 of 2016 (Kotwali) convicting the convict petitioner under section 326 of  the  Penal  Code,  1860  and  sentencing  him  to  suffer  rigorous imprisonment for 03 (two) years and also to pay a fine of Tk. 5,000/- in default to suffer rigorous imprisonment for a period of 02(two) months instead  of  convicting  under  section  326  of  the  Penal  Code,  1860  and sentencing thereunder to suffer rigorous imprisonment for 05 (five) years and  also  to  pay  a  fine  of  Tk.  5,000/-  in  default  to  suffer  rigorous imprisonment for a period of 03(three) months and instead of convicting under section 307 of the Penal Code, 1860 and sentencing thereunder to suffer rigorous imprisonment for 02 (two) years should not be set aside and/or pass such other or further order or orders as to this Court may seem fit and proper.

®e¡V h¡ B­cnl  a¡¢lM  ­e¡V J B­cn

œ²¢jL ew

Pending  disposal  of  the  rule,  let  the  convict petitioner Md. Hasan Miah, son of Basu @ Shah Alam be enlarged on ad-interim bail for a period of 01 (one) year on furnishing bail bond to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Jashore.

The rule is made returnable within 4 (four) weeks from date.

The petitioner shall put in 2 (two) sets of requisites within 7 days, for service of notice of the rule upon the opposite party in normal course as well as by registered post with A/D as per HCD Rules.

Office shall not issue any certified copy or  other copy of this order to the petitioner unless requisites are put in vide HCD Rules, Chapter IV Rule 3(6).

Kashem/B.o

âøhÉx L¡m¡ L¡¢ma A¢gp ®e¡Vl HL¢V œ²¢jL eðl Hhw m¡m L¡¢ma ®L¡VlÑ Bcnl BlL¢V œ²¢jL eðl qChz       ew pfj (h¡x h¡x ®L¡x)/®i¢Vw/g-110/85-3583