দায়বর্জন বিবৃতি (DISCLAIMER)

এই ওয়েবসাইটে প্রকাশিত রায় বা আদেশ আপনি google translation এর মাধ্যমে বাংলায় দেখতে পাচ্ছেন তা সুপ্রীম কোর্ট কর্তৃক বাংলায় অনূদিত নয়। জনসাধারণের বিচার-প্রক্রিয়ায় সহজ অভিগম্যতা নিশ্চিতকরণের অভিপ্রায়ে বাংলায় অনূদিত রায়-আদেশ দেখার ব্যবস্থা রাখা হয়েছে। অনূদিত রায় বা আদেশের অনুলিপি সইমোহরী/জাবেদা নকলের (certified copy) বিকল্প হিসেবে অথবা অন্য কোন উদ্দেশ্যে ব্যবহার করা যাবে না। রায় ও আদেশ বাস্তবায়নের ক্ষেত্রে মামলার নথিতে বিধৃত মূল রায় বা আদেশ প্রণিধানযোগ্য।
Microsoft Word - Lakshmipur-Abid Islam Rony

q¡C­L¡VÑ ®g±Sc¡l£ glj ew-35   +

20

h¡wm¡­cn p¤fË£j­ 

q¡C­L¡VÑ ¢hi¡N

Bf£m pÇf¢LÑa

­g±Sc¡l£

­Sm¡: Lakshmipur  ­g±Sc¡l£ L¡kÑ¢h¢d BC­el 435 d¡l¡l Ad£­el ¢l¢ine

ew

Abid Islam Rony  B­hceL¡l£ j¡dÉj        Mr. Fazley Rabbi, Advocate

he¡j

The State

Ms. Shiuli Khanom, D.A.G along with

         Mr. S.M. Emamul Musfiqur, A.A.G

         Mr. Md. Humayun Karim Siddique, A.A.G

fˢafr

fËbj Bc¡ma

jÉ¡¢S­øÊV,  a¡¢lM   20 n¡¢Ù¹ J cä¡­cn

Present

Mr. Justice Md. Khairul Alam

Bf£m Bc¡ma   a¡¢lM   20

L¡NSfœ h¡ B­c­nl  a¡¢lM  ­e¡V Hhw B­cn  ü¡rl

œ²¢jL ew

26.11.2024         In preferring the Criminal Revision under section 439 read with

section 435 of the Code of Criminal Procedure there had been a delay of 142 days for which the petitioner filed an application under section 5 of the Limitation Act.

        Considering the facts and circumstances, the delay of 142 days in filing the revision is hereby condoned.          

         Let records be called for and realization of fine be stayed.

         Let a rule be issued calling upon the opposite party to show cause as to why the judgment and order dated 19.10.2023 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, 1st Court, Lakshmipur in Criminal Appeal No. 455 of 2022 dismissing the appeal  and  thereby  affirming  the  judgment  and  order  of conviction and sentence dated 06.03.2022 passed by the learned Senior Judicial Magistrate, Druto Bichar Adalat, Lakshmipur in G.R. Case No. 43 of 2021 arising out of Kamalnagar Police Station Case No. 07 dated 12.04.2021 convicting the convict petitioner under section 4(1) of the Ain Sringkhola Bignakari Aparadh  (Druto  Bichar)  Ain,  2002  (as  amended,  2019)  and sentencing him to suffer rigorous imprisonment for 02 (two) years and also to pay a fine of Tk. 5,000/- (five thousand) in default to suffer rigorous imprisonment for 03 (three) months more should not be set aside and/or pass such other or further order or orders as to this Court may seem fit and proper.

®e¡V h¡ B­cnl  a¡¢lM  ­e¡V J B­cn

œ²¢jL ew

Pending  disposal  of  the  rule,  let  the  convict petitioner Abid Islam Rony, son of late Selim be enlarged on  ad-interim  bail  for  a  period  of  01  (one)  year  on furnishing bail bond to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Lakshmipur.

The rule is made returnable within 4 (four) weeks from date.

The petitioner shall put in 2 (two) sets of requisites within 7 days, for service of notice of the rule upon the opposite party in normal course as well as by registered post with A/D as per HCD Rules.

Office shall not issue any certified copy or  other copy of this order to the petitioner unless requisites are put in vide HCD Rules, Chapter IV Rule 3(6).

Kashem/B.o

âøhÉx L¡m¡ L¡¢ma A¢gp ®e¡Vl HL¢V œ²¢jL eðl Hhw m¡m L¡¢ma ®L¡VlÑ Bcnl BlL¢V œ²¢jL eðl qChz       ew pfj (h¡x h¡x ®L¡x)/®i¢Vw/g-110/85-3583

D:\Annex 14\Kashem, B.O\Crl. Motion, Sinbgal Bench\20.10.2024\Lakshmipur-Abid Islam Rony.doc