দায়বর্জন বিবৃতি (DISCLAIMER)

এই ওয়েবসাইটে প্রকাশিত রায় বা আদেশ আপনি google translation এর মাধ্যমে বাংলায় দেখতে পাচ্ছেন তা সুপ্রীম কোর্ট কর্তৃক বাংলায় অনূদিত নয়। জনসাধারণের বিচার-প্রক্রিয়ায় সহজ অভিগম্যতা নিশ্চিতকরণের অভিপ্রায়ে বাংলায় অনূদিত রায়-আদেশ দেখার ব্যবস্থা রাখা হয়েছে। অনূদিত রায় বা আদেশের অনুলিপি সইমোহরী/জাবেদা নকলের (certified copy) বিকল্প হিসেবে অথবা অন্য কোন উদ্দেশ্যে ব্যবহার করা যাবে না। রায় ও আদেশ বাস্তবায়নের ক্ষেত্রে মামলার নথিতে বিধৃত মূল রায় বা আদেশ প্রণিধানযোগ্য।
Microsoft Word - Dhaka-Md. Ibrahim Khalil

q¡C­L¡VÑ ®g±Sc¡l£ glj ew-35   +

20

h¡wm¡­cn p¤fË£j­ 

q¡C­L¡VÑ ¢hi¡N

Bf£m pÇf¢LÑa

­g±Sc¡l£

­Sm¡: Dhaka   ­g±Sc¡l£ L¡kÑ¢h¢d BC­el 435 d¡l¡l Ad£­el ¢l¢ine

ew

Md. Ibrahim Khalil   B­hceL¡l£

j¡dÉj        Mr. Md. Ruhul Quddus Kazal, Senior Advocate with

Mr. Md. Khaled Hussain, Advocate

he¡j

The State and another

Mr. Mohammad Arshadur Rouf, Additional Attorney General along with Ms. Shiuli Khanom, D.A.G 

          Mr. S.M. Emamul Musfiqur, A.A.G

          Mr. Md. Humayun Karim Siddique, A.A.G

                  fË¢afr

fËbj Bc¡ma

jÉ¡¢S­øÊV,  a¡¢lM   20 n¡¢Ù¹ J cä¡­cn

Present

Mr. Justice Md. Khairul Alam

Bf£m Bc¡ma   a¡¢lM   20

L¡NSfœ h¡ B­c­nl  a¡¢lM  ­e¡V Hhw B­cn  ü¡rl

œ²¢jL ew

26.11.2024         In preferring the Criminal Revision under section 439 read with

section 435 of the Code of Criminal Procedure there had been a delay of 54 days for which the petitioner filed an application under section 5 of the Limitation Act.

        Considering the facts and circumstances, the delay of 54 days in filing the revision is hereby condoned.                   

         Let records be called for and realization of fine be stayed.

         Let a rule be issued calling upon the opposite parties to show cause as to why the judgment and order dated 28.05.2024 passed by the  learned  Additional  Metropolitan  Sessions  Judge,  2nd  Court, Dhaka in Criminal Appeal No. 1485 of 2022 dismissing the appeal and  thereby  affirming  the  judgment  and  order  of conviction  and sentence  dated  22.09.2022  passed  by  the  learned  Metropolitan Magistrate,  Court  No.34,  Dhaka  in  C.R.  Case  No.  238  of  2018 convicting  the  convict  petitioner  under  section  3  of  the  Dowry Prohibition  Act,  2018  and  sentencing  him  to  suffer  rigorous imprisonment  for  13  (thirteen)  months  and  also  pay  fine  of  Tk. 5,000/- (five thousand) in default to suffer simple imprisonment of 01 (one) month more should not be set aside and/or pass such other or further order or orders as to this Court may seem fit and proper.


®e¡V h¡ B­cnl  a¡¢lM  ­e¡V J B­cn

œ²¢jL ew

Pending  disposal  of  the  rule,  let  the  convict petitioner Md. Ibrahim Khalil, son of late Abdul Hai be enlarged on ad-interim bail for a period of 01 (one) year on furnishing bail bond to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Dhaka.

The rule is made returnable within 2 (two) weeks from date.

The petitioner shall put in 2 (two) sets of requisites within 7 days, for service of notice of the rule upon the opposite party in normal course as well as by registered post with A/D as per HCD Rules.

Office shall not issue any certified copy or  other copy of this order to the petitioner unless requisites are put in vide HCD Rules, Chapter IV Rule 3(6).

Kashem/B.o

âøhÉx L¡m¡ L¡¢ma A¢gp ®e¡Vl HL¢V œ²¢jL eðl Hhw m¡m L¡¢ma ®L¡VlÑ Bcnl BlL¢V œ²¢jL eðl qChz       ew pfj (h¡x h¡x ®L¡x)/®i¢Vw/g-110/85-3583

D:\Annex 14\Kashem, B.O\Crl. Motion, Sinbgal Bench\20.10.2024\Dhaka-Md. Ibrahim Khalil.doc