q¡C−L¡VÑ ®g±Sc¡l£ glj ew 35

22 00  

h¡wm¡−−−ccnn pp¤f¤fˣˣjj−−LL¡¡VVÑ Ñ qq¡¡CC−−−LL¡¡VVÑ Ñ ¢¢hhii¡¡NN  

Bf£m pÇf¢LÑa −−gg±±SScc¡¡ll£££

−Sm¡-Panchagarh

−g±Sc¡l£ L¡kÑ¢h¢d BC−el       d¡l¡l Ad£−el ¢l¢ine

ew

Md. Monsur Alam  

    B−hceL¡l£ j¡dÉj   Mr. Pabel Mia, Advocate

he¡j

The State 

                   fË¢afr Mr. Rezaul Karim (Reza), D.A.G with

Mr. Md. Shahidul Islam, A.A.G with

Ms. Sharmin Hamid, A.A.G

fËbj Bc¡ma

jÉ¡¢S−øÊV,  a¡¢lM     20

n¡¢Ù¹ J cä¡−cn

Present:

Mr. Justice Md. Shohrowardi

Bf£m Bc¡ma   a¡¢lM   20

L¡NSfœ h¡ B−c  a¡¢lM  −e¡V Hhw B−cn  ü¡rl

−nl

œ²¢jL ew

19.11.2024  Heard the learned Advocate Mr. Pabel Mia who appeared on behalf

of the convict-petitioner and the learned Deputy Attorney General Mr. Rezaul Karim (Reza) who appeared on behalf of the State.

The delay of 427 days in filing criminal revision is condoned. Records be called for.

Let a Rule be issued calling upon the opposite party to show cause as  to  why  the  judgment  and  order  of  conviction  and  sentence  dated 11.07.2023  passed  by  the  Additional  Sessions  Judge,  Court  No.  2, Panchagarh in Criminal Appeal No. 57 of 2022 disallowing the appeal and thereby  upholding  the  judgment  and  order  of  conviction  and  sentence dated 31.07.2022 passed by the Senior Judicial Magistrate, Court No. 3, Panchagarh in C.R. Case No. 589 of 2018 (Panchagarh) convicting the petitioner  under  Section  420  of  the  Penal  Code  and  sentencing  him thereunder to suffer simple imprisonment for 6(six) months and to pay a fine  of  Tk.  3,000(three  thousand)  in  default  to  suffer  further  simple imprisonment for 1(one) month more should not be set aside and/or such other or further order or orders passed as to this Court may seem fit and proper. 

The Rule is made returnable within 4(four) weeks from date.

Let the realization of fine be stayed.

Learned  Advocate  Mr.  Pabel  Mia  appearing  on  behalf  of  the convict-petitioner  having  placed  the  supplementary  affidavit  sworn  on 18.11.2024 submits that the convict-petitioner will settle the dispute out of Court if he is granted bail.

Considering  the  submission  of  the  learned  Advocate  for  the convict-petitioner, I am of the view that since the offence under Section 420 of the Penal Code is compoundable ends of justice would be best served if the convict-petitioner is enlarged on bail to settle the dispute between the parties out of Court. 

Let the convict-petitioner Md. Monsur Alam, son of late Mofidur Rahman be enlarged on bail for a period of 6(six) months from the date on furnishing bail bond to the satisfaction of the Additional Sessions Judge, Court No. 2, Panchagarh.

The convict-petitioner is directed to file an affidavit of compliance before expiry of the order granting bail.