q¡C−L¡VÑ ®g±Sc¡l£ glj ew-35

22 00  

h¡wm¡−−−ccnn pp¤f¤fˣˣjj−−LL¡¡VVÑ Ñ qq¡¡CC−−−LL¡¡VVÑ Ñ ¢¢hhii¡¡NN  

Bf£m pÇf¢LÑa −−gg±±SScc¡¡ll£££

−Sm¡-Shariatpur

−g±Sc¡l£ L¡kÑ¢h¢d BC−el       d¡l¡l Ad£−el ¢l¢ine

ew

Jamir Hossen Mridha  

    B−hceL¡l£ j¡dÉj   Mr. K.M. Habibur Rahman, Advocate

he¡j

The State 

                   fË¢afr

Mr. Md. Emran Khan, D.A.G with

Ms. Nasrin Hena, A.A.G with

Mr. Md. Uzzal Hossain, A.A.G with

Mr. Md. Abu Saleh Apel Mahamud, A.A.G

fËbj Bc¡ma

jÉ¡¢S−øÊV,  a¡¢lM     20 n¡¢Ù¹ J cä¡−cn

Bf£m Bc¡ma   a¡¢lM   20

L¡NSfœ h¡ B−c- a¡¢lM  −e¡V Hhw B−cn  ü¡rl

−nl

œ²¢jL ew

02.09.2024  Heard  the  learned  Advocate  Mr.  K.M.  Habibur  Rahman  who

appeared  on  behalf  of  the  convict-petitioner  and  the  learned  Deputy Attorney General Mr. Md. Emran Khan who appeared on behalf of the State.

The delay of 3020 days in filing criminal revision is condoned. Records be called for.

Let a Rule be issued calling upon the opposite party to show cause as to why the impugned judgment and order of conviction and sentence dated  23.03.2016  passed  by  the  Senior  Sessions  Judge,  Shariatpur  in Criminal Appeal No. 16 of 2015 allowing the appeal and reversing the judgment and order of acquittal dated 23.03.2015 passed by the Senior Judicial Magistrate, Cognizance Court No. 01, Shariatpur in C.R. Case No. 253  of  2013  (Palong)  and  sentencing  the  petitioner  to  suffer  simple imprisonment for a period of 1(one) year under Section 4 of the Dowry Prohibition Act, 1980 should not be set aside and/or such other or further order or orders passed as to this Court may seem fit and proper. 

The Rule is made returnable within 4(four) weeks from date.

Let  the  convict-petitioner  Jamir  Hossen  Mridha,  son  of  late

Abdur Razzak Mridha be enlarged on bail for 6(six) months from the date on furnishing bail bond to the satisfaction of the Senior Sessions Judge, Shariatpur.