দায়বর্জন বিবৃতি (DISCLAIMER)

এই ওয়েবসাইটে প্রকাশিত রায় বা আদেশ আপনি google translation এর মাধ্যমে বাংলায় দেখতে পাচ্ছেন তা সুপ্রীম কোর্ট কর্তৃক বাংলায় অনূদিত নয়। জনসাধারণের বিচার-প্রক্রিয়ায় সহজ অভিগম্যতা নিশ্চিতকরণের অভিপ্রায়ে বাংলায় অনূদিত রায়-আদেশ দেখার ব্যবস্থা রাখা হয়েছে। অনূদিত রায় বা আদেশের অনুলিপি সইমোহরী/জাবেদা নকলের (certified copy) বিকল্প হিসেবে অথবা অন্য কোন উদ্দেশ্যে ব্যবহার করা যাবে না। রায় ও আদেশ বাস্তবায়নের ক্ষেত্রে মামলার নথিতে বিধৃত মূল রায় বা আদেশ প্রণিধানযোগ্য।
Microsoft Word - Noakhali Md. Helal and others _2727_.docx

1

DISTRICT-NOAKHALI.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BANGLADESH

      HIGH COURT DIVISION (CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS JURISDICTION)

Criminal Miscellaneous Case No.                   of 2024.

In the matter of:

An application under Section 498 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for anticipatory bail. -And-

                  In the matter of :

Md. Helal and others

&.... Accused-petitioners.

             -Versus-

The State

..........Opposite-party. Mr. Abdullah Al Mahmud, Advocate

...... For the accused-petitioners. Mr. Md. Saiefuddin Khaled, D.A.G with

Mr. Md. Asaduzzaman, A.A.G with

Mrs. Afifa Begum Swapna, A.A.G and

Mr. Sarwar Akhtar Masud, A.A.G,

....... For the State-opposite-party.

      Present:

Mr. Justice Md. Nazrul Islam Talukder

      And

Mr. Justice Kazi Ebadoth Hossain

Order dated: the 16th day of January, 2024.

This is an application under Section 498 of the Code of Criminal Procedure for enlarging the accused- petitioners on anticipatory bail in G.R No.02 of 2024 arising out of Companigonj Police Station Case No.2 dated 02.01.2024 under Sections 143 / 341 / 323 / 307 /

506 / 114 of the Penal Code, 1860 read with Sections 3/3A of the Explosive Substances Act, 1908 now pending before the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Noakhali.

The accused-petitioners who have been identified by their engaged Advocate, have surrendered before this Court today. 

The learned Advocate for the accused-petitioners, submits that the allegations made in the First Information Report are not true and that the informant has filed the instant case to harass and humiliate the petitioners and for these reasons, the accused- petitioners may be enlarged on anticipatory bail.

He next submits that the accused-petitioners remain innocent until their guilt is proved beyond all reasonable doubt and any confinement prior to the legal verdict is unjustified and considering this aspect of the case, the accused-petitioners may be enlarged on anticipatory bail. 

He lastly submits that there is no specific allegation against the accused-petitioners rather they have been implicated with instant case with a view to harassing and humiliating them and as such, the accused-petitioners may be enlarged on anticipatory bail.

Mr. Md. Saiefuddin Khaled, the learned Deputy Attorney-General appearing for the State, opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail and submits that there are specific allegations against the accused-petitioners and as such, they should not be enlarged on anticipatory bail.

      We have heard the learned Advocate for the accused-petitioners and the learned Deputy Attorney- General for the State opposite-party and perused the application for anticipatory bail.

    Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, the allegations, the statements and the grounds taken in the application, we find prima-facie case in favour of the accused-petitioners and as such, we are inclined to enlarge the accused-petitioners on anticipatory bail for a limited period.

Let the accused-petitioners namely 1) Md. Helal son of late Imam Uddin, 2) Abu Toha alias Md. Abu Toha son of Md. Azizul Haque, 3) Humayun Kabir son of Nur Islam, 4) Abdullah Al Mamun son of late Abdul Halim, 5) Nazmul son of Mobarak Ullah, 6) Abdul Kalam Azad son of late Abul Hashem enlarged on anticipatory bail in the above mentioned case for a period of 6(six) weeks from date, on furnishing adequate bail bond to the satisfaction of the Court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Mymensingh.

The accused-petitioners are directed not to go abroad without the permission of the learned Judge of the concerned Court below.

The accused-petitioners are directed to provide necessary assistance and co-operation to the investigating agency if required and asked for.

Immediately after expiry of the period of anticipatory bail, the accused-petitioners are directed to surrender before the Court of learned Sessions Judge, Mymensingh, positively and without fail.

However, the learned Court of learned Sessions Judge, Mymensingh, is directed to deal with the case in accordance with law.

With the above observations and directions, the application is disposed of.

Let a copy of this order be communicated to the Court of learned Sessions Judge, Mymensingh and the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Mymensingh, at once.

Md. Nazrul Islam Talukder, J.

        And

Kazi Ebadoth Hossain, J.