q¡C L¡VÑ ®g±Sc¡l£ glj ew-35

20

h¡wm¡ cn p¤fË£j L¡VÑ q¡C L¡VÑ ¢hi¡N

Bf£m pÇf¢LÑa

 g±Sc¡l£

 Sm¡ -Narayangonj

 g±Sc¡l£ L¡kÑ¢h¢d BC el       d¡l¡l Ad£ el ¢l¢ine

ew

Md. Jahidul Islam

    B hceL¡l£ j¡dÉj   Mr. Mohammad Rahamat Ullah, Advocate

he¡j

The State and others

                   fË¢afr Mr. S.M.Golam Mostofa Tara, D.A.G with

Mr. A. Mannan,AAG

fËbj Bc¡ma

jÉ¡¢S øÊV,  a¡¢lM    20

n¡¢Ù¹ J cä¡ cn

Present:

Mr. Justice Md. Shohrowardi

Bf£m Bc¡ma   a¡¢lM   20

L¡NSfœ h¡ B c- a¡¢lM  e¡V Hhw B cn  ü¡rl

 nl

œ²¢jL ew

21.05.2024  Records be called for.

Lat a Rule be issued calling upon the opposite party to show cause as to why the impugned judgment and order of conviction  and  sentences  dated  11.06.2023  passed  by  the Sessions  Judge,  Narayanganj  in  Criminal  Appeal  No.  79  of 2023 allowing the appeal in part and modifying the judgment and order of conviction and sentences dated 05.09.2022 passed by  Additional  Chief  Judicial  Magistrate,  Narayanganj  in Sonargaon  Police  Station  Case  No.  57  dated  18.03.2018 corresponding  G.R  No.  217  of  2018,  T.R  No.  616  of  2018 convicting the accused under section 279 of the Penal Code, 1860 and sentencing him to suffer rigorous imprisonment for 01 (one) year and to pay a fine of Tk. 1000 (one thousand), in default, to suffer simple imprisonment for a period of 01 (one) month and also convicting him under section 304(Kha) of the Penal  Code,  1860  and  sentencing  him  thereunder  to  suffer rigorous imprisonment for 02 (two) years and to pay a fine of Tk.2000, in default, to suffer simple imprisonment for 02 (two) months more both the sentences will run consecutively should not be set aside and/or pass such other order or further order or orders as to this court may seem fit and proper.

The Rule is made returnable within 04(four) weeks from

date.

Pending hearing of the Rule the realization of fine be stayed.

The learned Advocate Mr. Mohammad Rahamat Ullah appearing on behalf of the convict petitioner submits that in the meantime the convict petitioner already served about 01(one) year and 06(six) months in custody and there is no early chance of disposal of the Rule. Therefore, he prayed for bail.

Learned  Deputy  Attorney  General  Mr.  S.M.  Golam Mostofa Tara who appeared on behalf of the State opposes the prayer for bail.

Considering  the  facts  and  circumstances  of  the  case, quantum of sentence and the custody of the convict petitioner, I am inclined to enlarge the convict petitioner on bail.

Let  the  convict-petitioner,  Md.  Jahidul  Islam  son  of Md. Rohim Box be enlarged on bail to the satisfaction of the Sessions Judge,  Narayanganj for a period of 06(six) months from date.

The  office  is  directed  to  serve  the  notice  upon  the opposite parties by usual course as well as registered post with acknowledgment receipt.

The convict petitioner is directed to put in the requisites forthwith.