দায়বর্জন বিবৃতি (DISCLAIMER)

এই ওয়েবসাইটে প্রকাশিত রায় বা আদেশ আপনি google translation এর মাধ্যমে বাংলায় দেখতে পাচ্ছেন তা সুপ্রীম কোর্ট কর্তৃক বাংলায় অনূদিত নয়। জনসাধারণের বিচার-প্রক্রিয়ায় সহজ অভিগম্যতা নিশ্চিতকরণের অভিপ্রায়ে বাংলায় অনূদিত রায়-আদেশ দেখার ব্যবস্থা রাখা হয়েছে। অনূদিত রায় বা আদেশের অনুলিপি সইমোহরী/জাবেদা নকলের (certified copy) বিকল্প হিসেবে অথবা অন্য কোন উদ্দেশ্যে ব্যবহার করা যাবে না। রায় ও আদেশ বাস্তবায়নের ক্ষেত্রে মামলার নথিতে বিধৃত মূল রায় বা আদেশ প্রণিধানযোগ্য।

q¡C L¡VÑ ®g±Sc¡l£ glj ew-35

20

h¡wm¡ cn p¤fË£j L¡VÑ q¡C L¡VÑ ¢hi¡N

Bf£m pÇf¢LÑa

 g±Sc¡l£

 Sm¡ -Panchagarh                                         439/435

 g±Sc¡l£ L¡kÑ¢h¢d BC el       d¡l¡l Ad£ el ¢l¢ine

ew

Md. Merazul Haque

    B hceL¡l£

j¡dÉj   Mr. Md. Nurul Islam Sujan, Senior Advocate with

Mr. Mahfuj Ul Alam, Advocate

he¡j

The State

fˢafr

Mr. S.M. Golam Mostofa Tara, D.A.G with Mr. A. Monnan, A.A.G

fËbj Bc¡ma

jÉ¡¢S øÊV,  a¡¢lM    20 n¡¢Ù¹ J cä¡ cn

Present:

Mr. Justice Md. Shohrowardi

Bf£m Bc¡ma   a¡¢lM   20

L¡NSfœ h¡ B- a¡¢lM  e¡V Hhw B cn  ü¡rl

 c nl

œ²¢jL ew

08.05.2024  The delay of 139 days in filing revisional application is

hereby condoned.

Records be called for.

Let a Rule be issued calling upon the opposite party to show cause as to why the impugned judgment and order dated 18.10.2023  passed  by  the  Additional  Sessions  Judge, Panchagarh in Criminal Appeal No. 102 of 2017 affirming the judgment  and  order  of  conviction  and  sentence  dated 03.07.2017 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Panchagarh arising  out  of  Boda  Police  Station  Case  No.  03  dated 09.02.2010  corresponding  G.R  No.  15  of  2010  (Boda) convicting the petitioner under section 473 of the Penal Code, 1860 and sentencing him to suffer rigorous imprisonment for 7 (seven) years and to pay a fine of Tk. 5,000, in default, to suffer simple imprisonment for 06 (six) months should not be set aside and/or pass such other or further order as to this court may seem fit and proper.

The Rule is made returnable within 4(four) weeks from

date.

Pending hearing of the Rule, the realization of fine be stayed.

The learned Senior Advocate Mr. Md. Nurul Islam Sujan appearing along with learned Advocate Mr. Mahfuj Ul Alam on  behalf  of  the  convict  petitioner  submits  that  the  convict petitioner  is  aged  about  75  years  and  in  the  meantime,  he suffered in custody for more than 04(four) months. Therefore, he prayed for bail of the convict petitioner.

Learned  Deputy  Attorney  General  Mr.  S.M.  Golam Mostofa Tara who appeared on behalf of the State opposes the prayer for bail.

I  have  gone  through  the  evidence,  the  impugned judgments  and  orders  passed  by  the  courts  below  and  the records.

Considering  the  facts  and  circumstances  of  the  case, evidence and the age of the convict petitioner, I am inclined to enlarge the convict-petitioner on bail.

Let the convict-petitioner, Md. Merazul Haque son of Komar Uddin Ahmed be enlarged on bail to the satisfaction of the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Panchagarh for a period of 06(six) months from date.

The convict petitioner is directed to put in the requisites forthwith.