District-Dhaka

Mijuan Miah

..…Accused-petitioner.

                -Versus-

The State

....…Opposite-party. Mr. Mohammad Alamgir Shak, Advocate

..…For the Accused-petitioner.

Mr. A K M Amin Uddin, D.A.G with

Mr. Md. Asaduzzaman, A.A.G with

Mrs. Afifa Begum Swapna, A.A.G and

Mr. Sarwar Akhtar Masud, A.A.G,

.......For the State-opposite party.

      Present:

Mr. Justice Md. Nazrul Islam Talukder.

       And

Mr. Justice Kazi Ebadoth Hossain

06.05.2024.

Heard the learned Advocate for the accused- petitioner and the learned Deputy Attorney-General for  the  State-opposite  party  and  perused  the application  along  with  prosecution  materials annexed therewith.

Records need not be called for.

 Let a Rule be issued calling upon the opposite-party to show cause as to why the accused-petitioner should not be enlarged on bail in  Metro. Sessions Case No.3759 of 2022 (Sessions Case No.12 of 2022) arising out of Mugda Police Station Case No.62 dated 29.02.2020 corresponding to G.R No.124 of 2020 under Sections 394/302/34 of the Penal Code, 1860 now pending in the Court of learned Special Sessions Judge, Dhaka and Druto Bichar Tribunal 02, Dhaka and/or pass such other or further order or orders as to this Court may seem fit and proper.

The Rule is made returnable within 4(four) weeks from date.

However, the accused-petitioner shall put in 2(two) sets of requisites within 7 (seven) days, for service of notice of the Rule upon the opposite- party in normal course as well as by registered post with A/D as per HCD Rules.

Office shall not issue any certified copy of this order to the petitioner unless requisites are put in.