District-Bandarban

Md. Arifur Rahman alias Laileng

..…Accused-petitioner.                 -Versus-

The State

....…Opposite-party.

Mr. Mohammad Ali, Advocate

..…For the Accused-petitioner. Mr. A K M Amin Uddin, D.A.G with

Mr. Md. Asaduzzaman, A.A.G with

Mrs. Afifa Begum Swapna, A.A.G and

Mr. Sarwar Akhtar Masud, A.A.G,

.......For the State-opposite party.

      Present:

Mr. Justice Md. Nazrul Islam Talukder.

       And

Mr. Justice Kazi Ebadoth Hossain

06.05.2024.

Heard the learned Advocate for the accused- petitioner and the learned Deputy Attorney-General for  the  State-opposite  party  and  perused  the application  along  with  prosecution  materials annexed therewith.

Records need not be called for.

 Let a Rule be issued calling upon the opposite-party to show cause as to why the accused-petitioner should not be enlarged on bail in  Bandarban Sadar Police Station Case No.08 dated 13.03.2023, corresponding to G.R Case No.28 of 2023 under Sections 6(2)(A)(A¡),(C),(D),(E)/ 8 / 9 / 10 / 11 / 12 / 13 of the Santrash Birodhi Ain, 2009 (Amendment in 2013) now pending in the Court of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Bandarban and/or pass such other or further order or orders as to this Court may seem fit and proper.

The Rule is made returnable within 4(four) weeks from date.

However, the accused-petitioner shall put in 2(two) sets of requisites within 7 (seven) days, for service of notice of the Rule upon the opposite- party in normal course as well as by registered post with A/D as per HCD Rules.

Office shall not issue any certified copy of this order to the petitioner unless requisites are put in.