IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BANGLADESH HIGH COURT DIVISION
(SPECIAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION)
WRIT PETITION NO. 8493 OF 2019 IN THE MATTER OF:
An application under Article 102 of the Constitution of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh.
-And-
IN THE MATTER OF:
Mariam Mujahida ....…Petitioner -V E R S U S-
The Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Secondary and Higher Education Division, Ministry of Education, Bangladesh Secretariat, Dhaka and others.
......Respondents.
Mr. Md. Humayun Kabir, Advocate
...…For the Petitioner Mr. ABM Abdullah Al Mahmud, DAG with Mr. Ashique Rubaiat, A.A.G
........ For the respondents
Present :
Mr. Justice K.M. Kamrul Kader
And
Mr. Justice Mohammad Ali
Heard On: 28.09.2021, 04.08.2022, 10.11.2022, 17.11.2022
And
Judgment on: 09.03.2023
K. M. Kamrul Kader , J :
On an application under Article 102 of the Constitution of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh, this Rule Nisi was issued on 01.08.2019, in following terms:-
“Let a Rule Nisi be issued calling upon the respondents to show cause as to why inaction of the
1
respondents in absorbing and regularizing the service of the petitioner as the Principal of the Government Rajoir Degree College, Rajoir, Madaripur by creating her post with effect from the date of Nationalization of her college and to pay her salary and other benefits as per provisions of the relevant national pay Scale of the government should not be declared to have been passed without lawful authority and is of no legal effect and as to why a direction should not be given upon the respondents to absorb and to regularize the service of the petitioner as the Principal of the government Rajoir Degree College, Rajoir, Madaripur by creating her post with effect from the date of nationalization of her college and to pay her salary and other benefits as per provisions of the relevant National Pay scale of the Government and /or pass such other or further order or orders as to this court may seem fit and proper.
Facts relevant for disposal of the Rule are that, the petitioner has been discharging her duties as Principal of the Government Rajoir College, Rajoir, Madaripur. She has successfully completed her academic career and obtained B.A (Hon’s) and M.A degree in English, securing 2nd Class from University of Rajshahi and thereby she applied for the post of Lecturer, Department of English, Charmugria College, Madaripur, in response to the advertisement published by the concerned authority and the selection committee selected the petitioner to the said post. Consequently, she joined in the said college on 08.01.1992 in response to the appointment letter dated 01.01.1992 issued by the Principal of the said college and since then she has been serving as Lecturer of the said college for more than 10(ten) years. Thereafter, the petitioner was enlisted in the Monthly Pay Order (MPO) from June, 1992, her Index No. is 400740 and since then she has been receiving the MPO benefits against her service. In the meantime, she was promoted as the Assistant Professor (A/P) from the Lecturer. In course of service, she applied for the post of the Vice- Principal, Kazi Mintu College, Kotalipara, Gopalganj, in response to the advertisement published by the concerned authority and the selection committee duly selected her for the said post of Vice-Principal and she joined in the said college on 23.09.2002 in response to the appointment letter dated 19.09.2002 issued by the Principal of the said College. Since then she has been serving as Vice-Principal of the said College for more than 06(six) years and she has been receiving the MPO benefits against her post from September, 2002 through her Index No. 400740. Thereafter, the petitioner applied for the post of the Principal, Rajoir Degree College, Rajoir, Madaripur in response to the advertisement published by the concerned authority and the Selection Committee duly selected the petitioner for the said post and she joined in the said college on 10.11.2008 in response to the appointment letter dated 06.11.2008 issued by the President of the Governing body of the said College and since then she has been serving as Principal of the said college for more than 10(ten) years and she has been receiving the MPO benefits against her post from November, 2008. Erstwhile; the Government of Bangladesh initially took a decision to Nationalize the said Rajoir Degree College, Madaripur and in pursuance of the said decision an inspection was conducted by an inspection team consisting with 01(one) member from the office of the Directorate of the Secondary and Higher Education Dhaka and after holding physical inspection, a report was submitted by the inspection
three) posts including the post of the petitioner, wherein the inspection
team in its inspection report opined about the petitioner that - “ pw¢nÔø f®cl
¢eu¡N f¢Ðœ²u¡ kb¡kb ¢Rm Hhw ¢h. ¢p. Hp (p¡x ¢nx) LÉ¡X¡ll fÐi ¡oL fcl SeÉ L¡jÉ
¢nr¡Na ®k¡NÉa¡ BRz” as evident Annexure:-F to the writ petition, but the respondent are sitting idle and did not pay any heed to it.
Thereafter, on 06.01.2019, another inquiry was held by an inquiry committee consisting of 03(three) members wherein they opined that,-
“fÐi¡oL Hhw Ef¡drÉ fc Se¡h j¢luj j¤S¡¢qc¡l ¢eu¡N ¢h¢d pÇja qu¢e ¢hd¡u a¡yl fc pªSe Ll¡ k¡u e¡z” (Annexure- G to the writ petition) but the said opinion is
malafide, arbitrarily and in violation of the existing Rules and Regulations. In the meantime, on 12.05.2019, the husband of the
petitioner filed an application with D.O. letter issued by the local Member
of Parliament (MP) before the Respondent No.8, Director General, Directorate of Secondary and Higher Education, Shikkha Bhaban, Dhaka requesting him to re-inquire into the allegations made against the
petitioner and also requested to consider the legal points raised by the
petitioner in the body of the application filed on 12.05.2019. Having considered the said application filed by the husband of the petitioner, the
Deputy Director (College), Directorate of Secondary and Higher Education, Shikkha Bahvan, Dhaka issued a letter on 23.06.2019 for
forming an inquiry committee consisting of 03(three) members and
directing them to submit inquiry report afresh within 07 (seven) working
days, but said Committee did not submit any report till to date. It is
further stated as per provision of the existing Rules and Regulation, the
petitioner is entitled to be regularised or absorbed in her respective post and position i.e. the Principal of the said Rajoir Degree College (now Government Rajoir Degree College) Rajoir, Madaripur. Next, the petitioner filed 2 (two) applications on 08.08.2018 to the Respondent No.1, Secretary, Ministry of Education, Dhaka and the respondent No.8, Director General, Directorate of Secondary and Higher Education respectively and requesting them to create the post of the petitioner and also to appoint the petitioner on Ad-hoc basis and regularizing / absorbing her as the Principal of the Government Rajoir Degree College, Rajoir, Madaripur, but the respondents remained silent without considering the claim of the petitioner or giving any reply.
It is also stated that the Government of Bangladesh finally took a decision to Nationalize the college of the petitioner i.e. Rajoir Degree College, Rajoir, Madaripur with effect from 30th March, 2016 contained in Memo No. 37.00.0000.070.02.023.2015-637 dated 11.04.2016 (Annexure-K to the writ petition). Thereafter, the respondent No.7, Deputy Secretary, Ministry of Public Administration, the Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh, Dhaka issued a letter to the Secretary, Ministry of Education giving consent to create the 29 (twenty nine) post of the Government Rajoir, Degree College, Rajoir, Madaripur excluding the post of the petitioner contained in Memo No. 05.00.0000.155.15.053. 18-34 dated 29.01.2019 (Annexure:- L to the writ petition).
Being aggrieved by and dissatisfied with the inaction of the respondents to absorb and regularize the petitioner in her respective post, finding no other alternative equally efficacious remedy, she filed this writ petition before this Court and obtained the instant Rule.
Mr. Md. Humayun Kabir, the learned Advocate for the petitioner submits that the inaction of the respondents in absorbing and regularizing the service of the petitioner as the Principal of the Government Rajoir Degree College, Rajoir, Madaripur by creating her post with effect from the date of nationalization of her college and to pay her salary and other benefits as per provisions of the relevant National Pay Scale of the Government is illegal, malafide, capricious in nature and has been passed by exercising high executive fiat and without considering the provisions of the Service Rules. Mr. Kabir also submits that the refusal of the respondents to absorb and regularize the service of the petitioner as the Principal of her College by creating her post with effect from the date of nationalization and to pay her salary and other benefits as per provisions of the relevant National Pay Scale of the Government is illegal and violative to the principle of natural justice. He also submits that before declaration of the said College as Nationalized College, the petitioner was duly appointed by the concerned Authority and joined in her College and got her salary and remuneration from the Government (MPO) from 2008 and subsequent years. The said College was nationalized in the year of 2016 and the petitioner should automatically be absorbed and regularized in her respective post with relevant pay scale of the said college from 30.03.2016, but the respondents refused to create the post of the petitioner and to absorb or regularize the service of the petitioner as the Principal of the nationalized college on the ground that she had no requisite
experience at the time of appointment of her earlier post i.e. Vice- Principal, which is not sustainable in the eye of law and as such, the respondents should be directed to absorb or regularize the service of the petitioner as the Principal of her Nationalized Government College from the date of nationalization of the said College and to pay her salary and other benefits as per provisions of the relevant National Pay Scale of the Government without making any delay and he prays for making the Rule Absolute. To substantiate his submission the learned Advocate for the petitioner cited the decisions in the case of (i) Md. Nure Alam vs. The Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh & others, unreported judgment in writ petition No.5283 of 2017, (ii) Tasaddaq Ahmad -vs.- Secretary, Ministry of Education, the Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh, unreported judgment in writ petition No.10886 of 2013, (iii) Mukty Roy -vs.- Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh & others, reported in 23 BLD (HCD)-170, (iv) Abdur Rahim & 6 others -vs.- Government of Bangladesh & others, reported in 1 MLR (HCD)-213, (v) Hosne Ara Khanam -vs.- Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh & others, reported in 1 MLR (HCD)-220, (vi) Md. Abdur Razzaque -vs.- Md. Mizanur Rahman & others, reported in 2016 (1) LNJ (HCD)-31 and (vi) Anowara Chowdhury and others -vs.- Bangladesh & others, reported in 24 BLC (HCD)-213.
Mr. Md. Ashiq-Ul- Haque learned Assistant Attorney General opposing the Rule by filing an affidavit-in-opposition on behalf of Respondent No.8 and submits that the Government Rajoir Degree College, Rajoir, Madaripur was Nationalized on 30.03.2016. Thereafter, on 24.04.2019, 27 (twenty seven) posts were created and on 29.07.2019,
16 (sixteen) Lecturers were appointed as Ad-hoc basis according to the provision of “S¡a£uLlZL«a LmS ¢nrL J A-¢nrL LjÑQ¡l£ BaÈ£LlZ ¢h¢dj¡m¡,2000”. He also submits that the petitioner has no requisite qualifications for the post of Principal in any Nationalized college as per
above mentioned Bidhimala of 2000 and as such, the post of the petitioner
was not created in the said college. Hence, the Rule is liable to be discharged.
We have heard the learned Advocates appearing for both the sides, perused the writ petition, affidavit-in-opposition and other materials on record annexed herewith.
Learned Assistant Attorney General argued that the petitioner has
no requisite qualification to be appointed in the Charmuguria College. He
referred to the investigation report dated 12.12.2018 as evident Annexure-
‘G’ to the writ petition, wherein it is categorically stated that, “¢a¢e fÐi¡oL
fc pcl EfSm¡l Qlj¤…¢lu¡ LmS 08/01/1992 ¢MË. a¡¢lM ®k¡Nc¡e Lle, fÐi¡oL fc ®k¡Nc¡el pju ay¡l L¡jÉ ¢nr¡Na k¡NÉa¡ ¢Rm¡ e¡z flhaÑ£a 24/06/1992 ¢MË. a¡¢lM a¡yl j¡ø¡pÑ fl£r ¡l gm¡gm fÐL¡¢na qu Hhw I ¢ceC fiСoL fc a¡l Q¡Ll¥£ ¢eu¢jaLlZ Ll¡ quz
¢L¿º ay¡l ¢eu¡N ¢eu¢jaLlZl SeÉ ¢h¢d ®j¡a¡hL ¢eu¡N ¢h‘¢ç Hhw ¢eu¡N ®h¡XÑ NWe Ll¡ qu¢ez gm fÐi ¡oL fc a¡ly ¢eu¡N ¢h¢dpÇja euz”
Let us now consider whether she has requisite qualification to be appointed as Lecturer of the Charmuguria College. First of all, the petitioner joined in the Charmuguria College on 08.01.1992 as Lecturer of the Department of English. Admittedly, the petitioner appeared in the M.A. examination and before publication of her result, she was appointed as Lecturer of the said college and her result was published on 24.06.1992
and on the same date, her service was regularized/confirmed by the appointing authority of the said college and the office of the DG enlisted him in the MPO list instead of raising any objection as to his premature entry. As the respondents did not raise any objection as to the petitioner’s entry without requisite qualification and hence, we are of the view that the respondents’ objection as to the petitioner’s entry without requisite qualification cannot be sustained at this stage and that it is hit by the principles of estoppels and acquiescence. We find support of this contention in the Judgment and order in Writ Petition No.10886 of 2013 of Tasadduq Ahmad –vs.- Secretary, Ministry of Education and others, wherein their Lordships held that,
“It was an admitted position that appearing in the M.A. examination and before publication of the result thereof, the petitioner was appointed as a Lecturer. However, immediately after publication of the result and on submission of the certificate to the appointing authority his appointment was regularized and that the office of the DG enlisted him in the MPO list instead of raising any objection as to his premature entry and thus he has been continuing his service for the next 19 (nineteen) years on receipt of the benefits of time seale from time to time as per the Rules. Therefore, the respondents’ objection as to petitioner’s entry without requisite qualification can not sustain at this stage and that it is hit by the principles of estoppel and acquiescence.”
Now the question is whether she has requisite qualification and experience to be appointed as Vice- Principal and Principal of a non- government College. Admittedly, the Vice- Principal and Principal of a non-government College were appointed as per provision of hplL¡l£ ¢XNË£ LmS ¢nrLcl Q¡L¥l£l naÑ ¢h¢d, 1994, which approved by the meeting of the Academic Council of the National University wherein qualification and experience for appointment of the Principal, Vice- Principal and Lecturer
of a non-government College were described, which reads as follows:
4z ¢nrL fc ¢eu¡Nl ®k¡NÉa¡ J A¢i‘a¡x
(L) AdÉr x fÐbj ®nÊZ£l pÀ¡aL pÇj¡e ¢XN£Ëpq ¢àa£u ®nÐZ£l pÀ¡aL¡šl ¢XNË£ Abh¡ ¢àa£u ®nÐZ£l pÀ¡aL pÇj¡e ¢XN£Ëpq fÐbj ®nÐZ£l pÀ¡aLL¡šl ¢XN£ËJ ¢XNË£LmS fkÑ¡u e§Éefr cn hvpll ¢nrLa¡l A¢i‘a¡, Abh¡
¢àa£u ®nÐZ£l pÀ¡aL pÇj¡e ¢XNË£pq ¢àa£u ®nÐZ£l pÀ¡aL¡šl ¢XN£ËAbh¡ fbÐj
¢hi¡N pÀ¡aL (f¡p) ¢XNË£pq ¢àa£u ®nÐZ£a pÀ¡aL¡šl ¢XNË£ Abh¡ ¢àa£u ¢hi¡N pÀ¡aL (f¡p) ¢XNË£pq fbÐj ®nÐZ£l pÀ¡aL¡šl ¢XNË£J ¢XNË£LmlS fk¡Ñu e§Éefr h¡l
hvpll ¢nr La¡l A¢i ‘ a¡, Abh¡ ¢àa£u ¢hi ¡N pÀ¡aL f¡p ¢XN£Ëpq ¢àa£u ®nÐZ£l
pÀ¡aL¡šl ¢XNË£ J ¢XNË£ LmS fkÑ¡u e§Éefr fel hvpll A¢i‘a¡z
e¡Vx AdÉr ¢eu¡Nl SeÉ ¢hnÄ¢hcÉ¡mul Ae¤j¢a NËqZ L¢lu¡ A¢i‘a¡l pjuL¡ml na Ñ¢n¢bm Ll¡ k¡Ca f¡l k¢c AdÉr fcfСbÑ£ Hj.¢gm/XƒlV ¢XNË£l
A¢dL¡l£ qez
(M) Ef¡dÉrx Ef¡dÉr ¢nr¡Na ®k¡NÉa¡ AdÉrl ¢nr¡Na ®k¡NÉa¡l Ae¤l¦f
qChz ah HC fcl A¢i‘a¡l pjuL¡m AdÉ¡rl A¢i‘a¡l pjuL¡m qCa c¤C
hvpl Lj qCa f¡lz
It transpires from the record that the petitioner has been discharging her duties as the Principal of the Government Rajoir College, Rajoir, Madaripur at the time of nationalization of the college. She has successfully completed her academic career and obtained B.A (Hon’s) and M.A degree in English, securing 2nd Class from University of Rajshahi. Thereafter, she applied for the post of Lecturer, Department of English, Charmuguria College, Madaripur, in response to the advertisement published by the concerned authority and the selection committee duly selected the petitioner to the said post. Consequently, she joined in the said college on 08.01.1992 in response to the appointment letter dated 01.01.1992 issued by the Principal of the said college and since then she has been serving as Lecturer of the said college for more than 10(ten) years. Thereafter, the petitioner was enlisted in the Monthly Pay Order (MPO) from June, 1992 being index No. 400740 and since then she has been receiving the MPO benefits against her respective post. In the meantime, she was promoted as the Assistant Professor (A/P) from the Lecturer. Thereafter, she applied for the post of the Vice-Principal, Kazi Mintu College, Kotalipara, Gopalganj, in response to the advertisement published by the concerned authority and the selection committee duly selected her to be appointed for the said post of Vice-Principal and she joined in the said college on 23.09.2002 and since then she has been serving as Vice-Principal of the said College for more than 06(six) years and she was enlisted in the Monthly Pay Order (MPO) from September, 2002 in her respective post, under her Index No. 400740.
On careful examination of the regulation 4(Kha) of the it also transpires that the petitioner was eligible to be appointed as the Vice-Principal of a Degree College. Admittedly, she has B.A (Hon’s) and M.A in English securing 2nd Class from the University of Rajshahi and having more than 10 (ten) years experience.
We also noticed that the petitioner applied for the post of the
Principal, Rajoir Degree Collge, Rajoir, Madaripur in response to the
advertisement published by the concerned authority and the selection
Committee duly selected the petitioner for the said post and she joined in
the said college on 10.11.2008 in response to the appointment letter dated
06.11.2008 issued by the President of the Governing body of the said
college and since then she has been serving as Principal of the said
college for more than 10(ten) years and she has been receiving her
Monthly Pay Order (MPO) from November, 2008 as principal of the said
College under index No. 400740. In the meantime, the Government of
Bangladesh initially took a decision to Nationalize the said Rajoir Degree
College, Madaripur and in pursuance of the said decision an inspection
was conducted by an inspection team consisting with 01(one) member of
the office of the Directorate of the Secondary and Higher Education
Dhaka after holding physical inspection, a report was submitted by the
inspection team of the Government on 16.09.2018 wherein he opined that,
“ pw¢nÔø fcl ¢eu¡N fТœ²u¡ kb¡kb ¢Rm Hhw ¢h. ¢p. Hp (p¡x ¢nx) LÉ¡X¡ll fÐi¡oL fcl SeÉ L¡jÉ ¢nr¡Na ®k¡NÉa¡ BRz” Thereafter, on 06.01.2019 another inquiry was held by an inquiry committee consisting of 03(three) members
wherein they opined that,- “fÐi¡oL Hhw Ef¡drÉ fc Se¡h j¢luj j¤S¡¢qc¡l ¢eu¡N
¢h¢d pÇja qu¢e ¢hd¡u a¡yl fcpªSe Ll¡ k¡u e¡z” It appears from the ®hplL¡l£ ¢nr¡
fТaù¡e (jq¡¢hcÉ¡mupj§q) Hl ¢nrL J LjÑQ¡l£cl SeÉ ¢eu¡N, k¡NÉa¡, A¢i‘a¡ J ®hae ®úm, that the petitioner have required qualification for the post of
Principal. The qualification of the teachers is reproduced here in verbatim:
hplL¡l£ ¢nr¡ fТaù¡e (jq¡¢hcÉ¡mpj§q) Hl ¢nrL LjÑQ¡l£cl ®hae i¡a¡¢cl plL¡l£ Awn fÐc¡e
Hhw Sehm L¡W¡j¡ pÇf¢LÑa e£¢aj¡m¡-1995
f¢l¢nø-L
®hplL¡l£ ¢nr¡ fТaù¡e (jq¡¢hcÉ¡mupj§q) Hl ¢nrL J LjÑQ¡l£cl SeÉ ¢eu¡N, k¡NÉa¡, A¢i‘a¡ J ®hae
®úm
œ²¢jL ew | fcl e¡j | ¢eu¡Nl SeÉ ¢nr¡Na ®k¡NÉa¡ (e§eÉaj | ) A¢i‘a¡ | ha | e ®úm | |||
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
| |||
| pÀ¡aL jq¡¢hcÉ¡mu |
|
|
| ||||
1z | AdÉr | Ef¡dÉr/pqL¡l£ AdÉ¡fL/EµQ j¡d aL¡šl ¢Xj Nq Ë¡¢h £ cÉ¡mul AdÉr fc 3 hvp Chz A¢i‘a¡pq ®j¡V 15 hvpll ¢nrLa¡l A¢i‘a¡z | ¢jL É7100-8700/- ll |
| ||||
2u ®nÐZ£l Ae¡pÑpq 2u ®nÐZ£l pÀ¡ Hhw pLm fl£r¡u 2u ¢hi¡N b¡¢La q Abh¡ 1j ®nÐe£l pÀ¡aL¡šl ¢XNË£pq pLm fl£r ¡u 2u ®nÐe£/¢hi¡N b¡¢La qChz |
|
|
| |||||
2z | Ef¡dÉr | pqL¡l£ AdÉ¡fL fc 3 hvpll A¢i‘a¡pq aL¡šl ¢X® Nj Ë¡V £ 12 hvpll ¢nrLa¡l A¢i‘a¡z a qChz | 6300-8050/- |
| ||||
2u ®nÐZ£l Ae¡pÑpq 2u ®nÐZ£l pÀ¡ Hhw pLm fl£r¡u 2u ¢hi¡N/nÐZ£ b¡¢L Abh¡ 1j ®nÐe£l pÀ¡aL¡šl ¢XNË£pq pLm fl£r ¡u 2u ®nÐe£/¢hi¡N b¡¢La qChz |
|
|
| |||||
3z | pqL¡l£ AdÉ¡fL | pw¢nÔø ¢nr¡ fТaù¡e fÐi¡oL fc 8 2u ®nÐZ£lA ¢i‘a¡ u 2¡ u j ®nÐe£l | hvpll4 800-7250/- |
| ||||
fc¡æ¢a pw¢nÔø ¢hou 2u ®nÐZ£l Ae¡pÑpq pÀ¡aL¡šl ¢XNË£ Hhw pLm fl£r ®nÐZ£/¢hi¡N b¡¢La qChz Abh¡ 1 pÀ¡aL¡šl ¢XNË£pq pLm fl£r ¡u 2u ®nÐe£/¢hi ¡N b¡¢La qChz |
|
|
| |||||
4z | fÐi¡oL | 2u ®nÐZ£l u ®nÐZ£/ À¡aL¡šl N b¡¢La | 2850-5155/- |
| ||||
pw¢nÔø ¢hou 2u ®nÐZ£l Ae¡pÑpq pÀ¡aL¡šl ¢XNË£ Hhw pLm fl£r¡u 2 ¢hi¡N b¡¢La qCh Abh¡ 1j ®nÐe£l p ¢XNË£pq pLm fl£r¡u 2u ®nÐe£/¢hi¡ qChz |
|
|
| |||||
j¿¹hÉ
œ²¢jL ew | fcl e¡j | ¢eu¡Nl SeÉ ¢nr¡Na ®k¡NÉ (e§Éeaj) | a¡ A¢i‘a¡ | hae ®úm | j¿¹hÉ | ||||
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 |
| ||||
| EµQ j¡dÉ¢jL jq¡¢hcÉ¡mu |
|
|
| |||||
1z | AdÉr | pqL¡l£ AdÉ¡f l pÀ¡aL¡šf lc jq¡¢hcÉ¡mu ¢hi¡N hvpll A¢i‘a¡pq ¡aL¡šl® j¡V 12 hvpl e£/¢hi¡N¢ nrLa¡l A¢i‘a¡z | L 6300-8050/- 5 l |
| |||||
2u ®nÐZ£l Ae¡pÑpq 2u ®nÐZ£ ¢XNË£ Hhw pLm fl£r¡u 2u b¡¢La qChz Abh¡ 1j ®nÐe£l pÀ ¢XNË£pq pLm fl£r¡u 2u ®nÐ b¡¢La qChz |
|
|
| ||||||
2z | pqL¡l£ AdÉ¡fL | pw¢nÔø ¢ l pÀ¡aL¡šf lТa ù¡e fiСoL ÐZ£/¢hi¡Nf c 8 hvpll ¡aL¡šlA ¢i‘a¡ e£/¢hi¡N | nr¡ 4800-7250/- |
| |||||
2u ®nÐZ£l Ae¡pÑpq 2u ®nÐZ£ ¢XNË£ Hhw pLm fl£r¡u 2u ®n b¡¢La qChz Abh¡ 1j ®nÐe£l pÀ ¢XNË£pq pLm fl£r¡u 2u ®nÐ b¡¢La qChz |
|
|
| ||||||
3z | fÐi¡oL | e¡pÑpq 2u Abh¡ 1j m fl£r¡u | 2850-5155/- |
| |||||
pw¢nÔø ¢hou 2u ®nÐZ£l A ®nÐZ£l pÀ¡aL¡šl ¢XN£ËHhw pLm fl£r ¡u 2u ®nÐZ£/ ¢hi¡N b¡¢La qCh ®nÐe£l pÀ¡aL¡šl ¢XNË£pq pL 2u ®nÐe£/¢hi¡N b¡¢La qChz |
|
|
| ||||||
However, the respondents with the plea of Janobal Kathamo without considering the Regulations unlawfully made remarks relating to the appointment of the petitioner as Lecturer and Vice-Principal of a non- government college was not made in accordance with law. The Respondents placed their reliance in the Nitimalas or guide-line. However, the Nitimalas were not made under any statutory provision of law or authority. Therefore, the Regulations shall prevail over all Nitimalas.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the matter and the discussions as made hereinbefore, we are of the view that the Rule has got much merit to succeed and justice would be better served if we direct the respondents to give appointment to the petitioner as Principal of the said College on ad-hoc basis as soon as possible in accordance with the law.
In the result, the Rule is made absolute with direction. The respondents are directed to regularize the petitioner’s post as Principal by creating her post with effect from the date of Nationalization of her college and pay her salary and other benefits within 04(four) months, from the date of receipt of this order, in accordance with the law, without fail.
There is no order as to cost. Communicate at once.
Mohammad Ali, J :
I agree.