দায়বর্জন বিবৃতি (DISCLAIMER)

এই ওয়েবসাইটে প্রকাশিত রায় বা আদেশ আপনি google translation এর মাধ্যমে বাংলায় দেখতে পাচ্ছেন তা সুপ্রীম কোর্ট কর্তৃক বাংলায় অনূদিত নয়। জনসাধারণের বিচার-প্রক্রিয়ায় সহজ অভিগম্যতা নিশ্চিতকরণের অভিপ্রায়ে বাংলায় অনূদিত রায়-আদেশ দেখার ব্যবস্থা রাখা হয়েছে। অনূদিত রায় বা আদেশের অনুলিপি সইমোহরী/জাবেদা নকলের (certified copy) বিকল্প হিসেবে অথবা অন্য কোন উদ্দেশ্যে ব্যবহার করা যাবে না। রায় ও আদেশ বাস্তবায়নের ক্ষেত্রে মামলার নথিতে বিধৃত মূল রায় বা আদেশ প্রণিধানযোগ্য।
Untitled

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BANGLADESH HIGH COURT DIVISION

(SPECIAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION) WRIT PETITION NO. 5794 OF 2023

IN THE MATTER OF

An application under Article 102 of the Constitution of the People ’s Republic of Bangladesh

-AND-

IN THE MATTER OF:

Kazi Mozammel Hoque and another

... Petitioners -Versus-

The learned Joint District Judge, 1st Court and Artha Rin Adalat and another

... Respondents Mr. Md. Ohidur Rahman, Advocate

.....For the petitioners Mr. Touhidul Hasan, Advocate

….. For the respondent No. 2

Heard on 31.10.2023 Judgment on 01.11.2023

Present:

Mr. Justice J.B.M. Hassan

and

Mr. Justice Razik-Al-Jalil

J.B.M. Hassan, J:

This Rule Nisi was issued in the following terms:

“Let a Rule Nisi be issued  calling upon the respondents to show cause as to why the Order No. 16 dated 09.02.2022 (Annexure-D to the writ petition) passed by learned Judge (Joint District Judge), 1st Court, Artha Rin Adalat, Feni in Artha Execution Case No. 05 of 2019 arising out of Artha Rin Suit No. 06 of 2016 allowing an application


1

under section 34(1) of the Artha Rin Adalat Ain, 2003 issuing warrant of arrest against the petitioners should not be declared to have been passed without any lawful authority and is of no legal effect and why the same should not be set aside and/or pass such other or further order or orders as to this Court may seem fit and proper.”

Both the parties advanced submissions in support of the Rule Nisi and opposing the Rule Nisi respectively.

It appears that challenging the same order other judgment- debtors earlier filed Writ Petition No. 1898 of 2023 and the Rule Nisi was made absolute by the judgment and order dated 26.04.2023 setting aside the impugned order allowing the decree-holder bank to file fresh application in accordance with law and following the observations made therein. The said judgment is annexed in the affidavit-in-opposition as Annexure- 1 filed by the respondent No. 2.

Therefore, the fate of the present Rule Nisi shall follow the said judgment as the impugned order is no more in existence.

Thus, the Rule Nisi is disposed of without any order as to costs. The impugned order No. 16 dated 09.02.2022 is hereby declared to be without lawful authority and the Bank is at liberty to file fresh application as per observation as made in the judgment and order dated 20.07.2023 passed in earlier Writ Petition No. 1898 of 2023.

Communicate a copy of the judgment and order to the respondents at once.

Razik-Al-Jalil, J:

I agree.

S.I.B.O.