h¡wm¡−cn p¤fË£j ®L¡VÑ q¡C−L¡VÑ ¢hi ¡N
(®cJu¡e£ ¢l¢i ne A¢d−r œ)
Ef¢ÙÛax
¢hQ¡lf¢a Se¡h ®j¡x Bnl¡g¥m L¡j¡m
¢p¢i m ¢l¢i ne ew 2167/2002
Bh¤m L¡−nj Hl jªa¤É−a a¡l Ju¡¢ln;
1(L) ®j¡R¡x g¢Sm¡ −hNj J AeÉ¡eÉ ------¢hh¡c£-fË¢afr-clM¡Ù¹L¡l£NZ
-he¡j-
nË£ fËjb L¥j¡l hp¡L Hl jªa¥É−a a¡l Ju¡¢ln;
1(L) nË£ fËeb L¥j¡l hp¡L J AeÉ¡eÉ
----h¡c£-Bf£mL¡l£-fË¢ah¡c£NZ
HÉ¡X−i¡−LV H,Bl,Hj, q¡p¡e¤‹¡j¡e ------¢hh¡c£-fË¢afr-clM¡Ù¹L¡l£NZ f−r
HÉ¡X−i¡−LV ¢h−e¡c L¥j¡l BN¡lJu¡m ------h¡c£-Bf£mL¡l£-fË¢ah¡c£NZ f−r
öe¡e£l a¡¢lM 23.11.21, 06.01.22, 25.05.22, 26.05.22 Hhw l¡u fËc¡−el a¡¢lM x 28.07.2022
¢hQ¡lf¢a ®j¡x Bnl¡g¥m L¡j¡mx
¢hh¡c£-fË¢afr-clM¡Ù¹L¡l£NZ LaѪL ®cJu¡e£ L¡kÑ¢h¢dl d¡l¡ 115 Ef-d¡l¡ 1 ®j¡a¡−hL clM¡Ù¹ c¡¢M−ml ®fË¢r−a Aœ ¢hi¡N LaѪL ¢ejÀh¢ZÑa Ef¡−u Aœ l¦m¢V Cp¤É Ll¡ q−u¢Rmx
“Let the records be called for and a rule issue calling upon the opposite parties to show cause as to why the Judgment and decree dated 04.04.2002 passed by the Joint District Judge, Artharin Adalat, Dinajpur in Other Class Appeal No. 72 of 1999 allowing the appeal setting aside the judgment and decree dated 31.03.1999 passed by the learned Assistant Judge, Hakimpur, Dinajpur in Other Class Suit No. 20 of 1996 dismissing the suit should not be set aside and/ or pass such other or further order or orders as this Court may seem fit and proper.”
1
−j¡LŸj¡¢V ¢eÖf¢šl m−rÉ OVe¡l pw¢rç ¢hhlZ HC ®k,
nË£ fËjb e¡b hp¡L h¡c£ q−u håL EÜ¡−ll ®j¡LŸj¡u ¢Xœ²£ ®Q−u AeÉ fËL¡l ®j¡LŸj¡ ew 20/1996 c¡−ul Ll−m Eiuf−rl c¡¢m¢mL Hhw ®j±¢ML p¡rÉ fkÑ¡−m¡Qe¡ L−l ¢h‘ pqL¡l£ SS, q¡¢Ljf¤l, ¢ce¡Sf¤l ¢hNa Cw−lS£ 31.03.1999 a¡¢l−M fËcš l¡u J ¢X¢œ²j§−m ®j¡LŸj¡¢V 1/2/4/5 ew ¢hh¡c£l ¢hl¦−Ü ®c¡alg¡ p§−œ Hhw 3 ew ¢hh¡c£l ¢hl¦−Ü HLalg¡p§−œ öe¡e£ A−¿¹ ¢he¡ MlQ¡u M¡¢lS L−lez Ef¢l¢õ¢Ma l¡u J ¢X¢œ²®a pwr¥ì q−u h¡c£ AeÉ fËL¡l Bf£m ®j¡LŸj¡ ew 72/1999 c¡−ul Ll−m ¢h‘ k¤NÈ ®Sm¡ SS (AbÑ GZ) Bc¡ma, ¢ce¡Sf¤l öe¡e£ A−¿¹ ¢hNa Cw−lS£ 04.04.2002 a¡¢l−M fËcš l¡u J ¢X¢œ² j§−m ( X¢œ² ü¡r−ll a¡¢lM 10.04.2002) Bf£m¢V ®c¡alg¡ öe¡e£−a j”¤l L−lez Ef¢l¢õ¢Ma l¡u J ¢X¢œ²−a pwr¥ì q−u ¢hh¡c£-fË¢afrNZ ®cJu¡e£ L¡kÑ¢h¢dl 115 (1) d¡l¡u clM¡Ù¹ c¡¢Mm L−l Aœ l¦m¢V fË¡ç qez
¢hh¡c£-fË¢afr-clM¡Ù¹L¡l£NZ f−r ¢h‘ HÉ¡X−i¡−LV H,Bl,Hj, q¡p¡e¤‹¡j¡e ¢hÙ¹¡¢lai¡−h k¤¢š²aLÑ EfÙÛ¡fe L−lez Afl¢c−L, h¡c£-Bf£mL¡l fË¢afrNZ f−r ¢h‘ HÉ¡X−i¡−LV ¢h−e¡c L¥j¡l BN¡lJu¡m ¢hÙ¹¡¢lai¡−h k¤¢š²aLÑ EfÙÛ¡fe L−lez
Aœ ¢p¢im ¢l¢ine clM¡Ù¹ Hhw eb£ fkÑ¡−m¡Qe¡ Llm¡jz Eiu f−rl f−rl ¢h‘ HÉ¡X−i¡−LVNZ Hl k¤¢š²aLÑ nËhZ Llm¡jz
…l¦aÄf§ZÑ ¢hd¡u pqL¡l£ SS, q¡¢Ljf¤l, ¢ce¡Sf¤l LaѪL AeÉ fËL¡l −j¡LŸj¡ ew-20/1996-H ¢hNa Cw−lS£ 31.03.1999 a¡¢l−Ml l¡u ¢e−jÀ A¢hLm Ae¤¢mMe q−m¡x
“Cq¡ HL¢V håL EÜ¡−ll ®j¡LŸj¡z h¡c£l BlS£l p¡l pw−rf HC ®k, e¡¢mn¡ S¢jl j¡¢mL ¢R−me h¡c£N−Zl ¢fa¡ ®Lnh Q¾cÐ hp¡Lz ®Lnh Q¾cÐ hp¡L 1965 Cw p¡−ml ¢c−L j¡l¡ ®N−m HC h¡c£àu Ju¡¢ln b¡−Lz ®Lnh Q¾cÐ S£¢ha b¡L¡L¡−m V¡L¡l fË−u¡S−e e¡¢mn£ S¢j håL l¡M¡l fËÙ¹¡h ¢c−m 1-3 ew ¢hh¡c£l ¢fa¡ 4 ew ¢hh¡c£ avL¡−m a¡q¡l e¡h¡mL f¤œ 1-3 ew ¢hh¡c£−cl e¡−j Eq¡ håL mC−a CµR¤L qe Hhw e¡¢mn¡ 1 ew m¡V i¨š² S¢j 1 ew ¢hh¡c£l e¡−j Hhw 2 ew ¢hh¡c£l e¡−j
Hhw 2 ew m¡V i¨š² S¢j 2-3 ew ¢hh¡c£−cl e¡−j håL mC−a CµR¤L qez
®pC ®j¡a¡−hL Na 20.03.59 Cw a¡¢l−M 4 ew ¢hh¡c£l ¢eLV qC−a 1ew mVi§š² S¢jl h¡hc 2,000/- V¡L¡ NËqZ Llax 2 ew ¢hh¡c£l e¡−j 2534
ew ®l¢Sx Lhm¡ håL c¢mm Hhw 4 ew ¢hh¡c£l ¢eLV qC−a B−l¡ 2,000/- V¡L¡ NËqZ Llax 2 ew mVi¨š² S¢jl h¡hc 2-3 ew ¢hh¡c£l e¡−j
2536 ew håL Lhm¡ c¢mm ®l¢S¢ØVÊ L¢lu¡ ®cez 1-3 ew ¢hh¡c£l ®L¡e ¢eSü ®a¡s¡ aq¢hm ¢Rme¡z 4 ew ¢hh¡c£ ¢eS A−bÑ ¢eS ü¡−bÑ e¡h¡mL ¢ae
f¤œ 1-3 ew ¢hh¡c£l e¡−j Eš² c¤C¢V håL c¢mm L−l ®eez Eš² HLC
a¡¢l−M 4 ew ¢hh¡c£ HLC ®~hW−L HLC c¢mm ®mML à¡l¡ 1 ew ¢hh¡c£ f−r HL¢V 2537 ew ®l¢S¢ØVÊ HLl¡le¡j¡ c¢mm −Lnh Q¾cÐ hp¡−Ll hl¡hl pÇf¡ce L¢lu¡ ¢cu¡ pÅ£L¡l J AwN£L¡l L−le ®k, 1366 h¡wm¡ p¡m
qC−a 1371 h¡wm¡ p¡−ml j−dÉ 6 hvpl ®ju¡−cl j−dÉ ®~Qœ¡−pl 25/26
a¡¢l−M f−el V¡L¡ HL−k¡−N 2ew ¢hh¡c£ ab¡ 4ew ¢hh¡c£−L ®gla ¢c−m
¢a¢e 1ew mVi¨š² S¢j ®Lnh Q¾cÐ hp¡−Ll hl¡hl ®gla ¢c−a h¡dÉ b¡¢L−hez Aflf−r 4ew ¢hh¡c£ 2ew mVi¨š² S¢jl h¡hc Eš² HLC a¡¢l−M Afl HL¢V 2536 ew ®l¢S¢ØVÊ HLl¡le¡j¡ c¢mm 2- 3ew ¢hh¡c£l
f−r ®Lnh Q¾cÐ hp¡−Ll hl¡hl 7 hvpl ®ju¡c£ Ae¤l©f ®gl−al c¢mm
L−lez e¡¢mn£ pÇf¢š haÑj¡e Hp, H, ®lLXÑ ®Lnh hp¡−Ll e¡−j qCu¡−Rz
®Lnh Q¾cÐ hp¡L e¡¢mn£ pÇf¢š naÑ ®j¡a¡−hL ®gla Q¡C−m 1-4 ew ¢hh¡c£Ne L¡m−rfe L−lez Aaxfl 1965 p¡−m ®Lnh Q¾cÐ h¡L p j¡l¡ ®N−m h¡c£Ne Ju¡¢ln b¡−Lz h¡c£NZ 1-4 ew ¢hh¡c£−L h¡l h¡l a¡N¡c¡
fËc¡e Ll¡ p−šÅJ ¢hh¡c£Ne e¡¢mn£ pÇf¢š ®gla ¢c−a L¡m−rfe Ll−a
b¡−Lz 1-3 ew ¢hh¡c£ p¡h¡mL qJu¡l flJ Eš² HLl¡le¡j¡ c¢mm c¤C¢V pÇf−LÑ AhNa B−Rez Aaxfl h¡c£Ne E¢Lm ®e¡¢Vn fËc¡e L¢l−mJ ¢hh¡c£Ne ®e¡¢Vn fË¡ç qCu¡J ®L¡e Ešl fËc¡e L−le e¡Cz Ah−n−o Na 15.07.96 Cw a¡¢lM ®j¡a¡−hL h¡wm¡ 1m¡ nË¡he, 1403 p¡m a¡¢l−M HC ¢hh¡c£àu f−r 1 ew h¡c£l f¤œ nË£ le¢Sv L¥j¡l hp¡−Ll j¡dÉ−j AeÉ¡eÉ p¡r£N−Zl p¡r¡−a 4,000/- V¡L¡ 1-4 ew ¢hh¡c£−L fËc¡e L¢lu¡ e¡¢mn L¢lu¡ S¢j ®gla Lhm¡ L¢lu¡ Q¡¢q−m 1-3 ew ¢hh¡c£Ne ®gla ¢c−a Aü£L¡l L−lez fËL¡n b¡−L ®k, 1 ew h¡c£l haÑj¡e hup 85 hvpl Hhw
2 ew h¡c£l haÑj¡e hup 80 hvplz ®pL¡l−Z le¢Sv L¥j¡−ll j¡dÉ−j 1-4
ew ¢hh¡c£l ¢eLV ®b−L e¡¢mn£ pj¢š ®glv ®Q−u¢Rmz BC−el ¢hd¡ej−a HLl¡l e¡j¡l a¡¢lM q−a 7 hvpl A¢aœ²¡¿¹ qJu¡u Eq¡ M¡u M¡m¡p£ hå−L
f¢lea q−u−Rz B−cn qJu¡ j¡œ f−el 4,000/- V¡L¡ Bc¡m−a h¡c£Ne
c¡¢Mm L¢l−hez fËL¡n b¡−L e¡¢mn£ S¢j håL fËc¡−el pjuC ¢hh¡c£Ne
®L cMm fËc¡e L−l−Rz h¡c£Ne e¡¢mn£ S¢jl håL EÜ¡−ll fË¡bÑe¡ L¢lu¡ Bc¡m−a Aœ ®j¡LŸj¡ Beue L¢lu¡−Rz
fr¡¿¹−l 1/2/4 ew ¢hh¡c£fr Hhw 5ew ¢hh¡c£ fªbL fªbL ¢m¢Ma Sh¡h c¡¢Mm L¢lu¡ h¡c£N−el c¡h£−L Aü£L¡l L−lez 1/2/4 ew ¢hh¡c£f−rl ¢m¢Ma Sh¡−hl p¡l pw−rf HC ®k, e¡¢mn£ S¢jl j§m j¡¢mL ¢R−me ®Lnh Q¾cÐ hp¡Lz HC Sh¡h c¡eL¡l£ ¢hh¡c£−cl ¢fa¡ 4ew ¢hh¡c£ ¢ae¢V Ù»£ Hhw hý p¿¹¡e p¿º¢a mCu¡ HL¢V ®k±b f¢lh¡l Hhw HC
¢hh¡c£Ne ®pC f¢lh¡−ll pcpÉz HL¡l−Z 4 ew ¢hh¡c£l fË−aÉL Ù»£ Hhw a¡−cl p¿¹¡e−cl fªbL ®a¡s¡ aq¢hm ¢Rmz 1/2 ew ¢hh¡c£l j¡a¡ a¡−cl A¡¢LL¡l V¡L¡ ¢c−u e¡¢mn£ S¢j œ²u L¢lu¡ ¢c−a CµR¤L qez ac¡e¤p¡−l
Eš² e¡h¡mL 1 ew ¢hh¡c£l f−r 4 ew ¢hh¡c£ Cw 18.03.57 a¡¢lM ®j¡a¡−hL h¡wm¡ 4W¡ ®~Qœ 1365 pe a¡¢l−M f−el pj¤cu 2,000/- V¡L¡
Eš² ®Lnh Q¾cÐ hp¡L−L h¤T¡Cu¡ ®ce Hhw ¢a¢e 1 ew ¢hh¡c£ hl¡hl ®M¡o Lhm¡ c¢mm L−l ®ce Hhw Cw 20.03.57 a¡¢l−M ®l¢S¢ØVÊ − Ll cMm fËc¡e L−lez HLCi¡−h flha£Ñ hvpl Ab¡Ñv 20.03.59 a¡¢lM 2/3 ew ¢hh¡c£ hl¡hl ®Lnh Q¾cÐ hp¡L 2ew m−Vl pÇf¢š ®M¡o Lhm¡ c¢mm ®l¢S¢øÊ L−l ¢c−u cMm fËc¡e L−lez avfl HC e¡h¡mL ¢hh¡c£fr a¡q¡−cl ¢fa¡ e¡¢mn£ pj¤cu S¢j cMm L−lez 3ew ¢hh¡c£ a¡q¡l ¢eS Aw−n S®~eL nJLa Bm£ hl¡hl ¢hœ²u L¢lu¡ ¢exüaÄh¡e q−u−Rez Eš² c¢m−m 1 ew h¡c£l pe¡š² p¡r£ ¢qp¡−h p¡rl L¢lu¡−Rez e¡¢mn¡ pÇf¢š h¡hc HC ¢hh¡c£Ne ®L¡e HLl¡le¡j¡ c¢mm L−le ®ce e¡C h¡ ®Lnh Q¾cÐ hp¡L e¡¢mn£ pÇf¢š ®L¡e ¢ce ®gla Q¡u e¡Cz Cq¡ R¡s¡ e¡h¡mL f−r 4ew ¢hh¡c£l Hl©f HLl¡le¡j¡ c¢mm L−l ®cu¡l ®L¡e A¢dL¡l e¡Cz ¢hd¡u
h¡c£ f−rl Aœ ®j¡LŸj¡ MlQ¡pq ¢Xp¢j−pl fË¡bÑe¡ L−l−Rez 5ew ¢hh¡c£l ¢m¢Ma Sh¡−hl p¡l pw−rf HC ®k, 5 ew ¢hh¡c£ 1/2/4 ew ¢hh¡c£f−rl ¢m¢Ma Sh¡h−L pjbÑe L¢lu¡ h−me ®k, 3ew ¢hh¡c£ e¡¢mn£
50 ew c¡−Nl 2.22 naL j−dÉ 1.00 HLl j−dÉ 50 naL Ešl f¢ÕQj
¢c−L ¢hœ²−ul nqla fËc¡e L¢l−m 5ew ¢hh¡c£ Eq¡ M¢lc L¢l−a pÇja
qez ac¡e¤p¡−l Na Cw 06.02.90 a¡¢lM −j¡a¡−hL h¡wm¡ 24 j¡O, 1396
pe a¡¢l−M p−h¡ÑµQ fe h¡q¡l 30,000/- V¡L¡ 3ew ¢hh¡c£−L h¤T¡Cu¡ ¢c−m
3 ew ¢hh¡c£ HC ¢hh¡c£l hl¡hl ®M¡p Lh¡m¡ c¢mm pÇf¡ce J ®l¢S¢ØVÊ L−l ®cez HC ¢hh¡c£ Eš² pÇf¢š x-1-340/93/94 ew M¡¢lS ®j¡LŸj¡
Na Cw 16.06.94 a¡¢l−M 262 ew M¡¢lS M¢au¡e M¤¢mu¡ ¢X,¢p,Bl J M¡Se¡ c¡¢Mm¡ j§−m M¡Se¡ fËc¡e L−le Bp−Rz e¡¢mn£ S¢j−a h¡c£N−el ®L¡e üaÄ cMm e¡C Hhw h¡c£N−el c¡h£L«a Hl©f ®L¡e HLl¡l e¡j¡ c¢mmJ e¡Cz ¢hd¡u h¡c£N−el Aœ ®j¡LŸj¡ MlQ¡pq ¢Xp¢j−pl fË¡bÑe¡ L−l−Rez
¢hQ¡kÑ ¢hou
1z Aœ ®j¡LŸj¡ haÑj¡e BL¡−l Q¢m−a f¡−l ¢L e¡?
2z Aœ ®j¡LŸj¡ a¡j¡c£ BC−e h¡¢la ¢L e¡?
3z e¡¢mn£ pÇf¢š−a h¡c£ üaÄ cMm ¢Qla−l qÙ¹¡¿¹¢la q−u−R ¢L e¡z
4z h¡c£ fË¡b£Ña j−a håL EÜ¡−ll ¢Xœ²£ f¡C−a f¡−l ¢Le¡?
5z h¡c£ Bl ®L¡e fË¢aL¡l f¡C−a f¡−l ¢Le¡?
B−m¡Qe¡ J ¢pÜ¡¿¹
h¡c£f−rl c¡¢Mm£ BlS£ Hhw ac¢hl¦−Ü ¢hh¡c£f−rl c¡¢Mm£ ¢m¢Ma Sh¡h J e¢b −c¢Mm¡j J fkÑ¡−m¡Qe¡ L¢lm¡jz h¡c£fr a¡q¡−cl
hš²−hÉl pjbÑ−e Q¡lSe p¡r£l p¡rÉ fËc¡e L¢lu¡−R Hhw fËcnÑe£-1-7 ew
¢Q¢q²a L¡NS¡c£ c¡¢Mm L¢lu¡−Rz Aflf−r ¢hh¡c£Ne a¡q¡−cl hš²−hÉl
pjbÑ−e Q¡lSe p¡r£l p¡rÉ fËc¡e L¢lu¡−R Hhw fËcnÑe£- L-R(3) ¢Q¢q²a
L¡NS¡c£ c¡¢Mm L¢lu¡−Rz h¡c£f−rl BlS£, ¢hh¡c£f−rl ¢m¢Ma Sh¡h,
p¡r£l ®Sl¡ Sh¡eh¾c£, c¡¢Mm£ L¡NS¡c£ J e¢b fkÑ¡−m¡Qe¡ L¢lu¡ HM
®cM¡ k¡L ¢hQ¡kÑ ¢hou ®L¡e f−rl Ae¤L¨−mz
¢hQ¡kÑ ¢hou-3x
h¡c£fr c¡h£ L−le ®k, a¡q¡−cl ¢fa¡ ®Lnh Q¾cÐ e¡¢mn£ 1 ew mVi¨š² pÇf¢š Na 20.03.59 Cw a¡¢l−M 4ew ¢hh¡c£l ¢eLV ®b−L f−el
V¡L¡ NËqZ L−l 4ew ¢hh¡c£l f¤œ 1ew ¢hh¡c£−L 2534 ew ®l¢S¢ØVÊ Lh¡m¡
L−l ®cu Hhw Ae¤l©fi¡−h 2 ew mVi¨š² pÇf¢š 4ew ¢hh¡c£l f¤œ 2/3 ew
¢hh¡c£−L 2536 ew Lh¡m¡ ®l¢S¢ØVÊ L−l ®cuz Eš² HLC a¢l ¡−M 1 ew
¢hh¡c£l f−r 4 ew ¢hh¡c£ h¡c£l (AØfø) HL¢V 2537 ew ®l¢S¢øÊ HLl¡l
e¡j¡ L−l ¢c−u hZÑe¡ L−le ®k, h¡c£l h¡h¡ 6 hR−ll j−dÉ V¡L¡ f¢l−n¡d
L¢l−m Eš² 1ew m−Vl pÇf¢š h¡c£l h¡h¡−L ®gla ¢c−h Hhw Ae¤l©fi¡−h
2 ew m−Vl pÇf¢š 2/3 ew ¢hh¡c£f−r 4 ew ¢hh¡c£ 7 hRl ®ju¡c£ 2536
ew ®l¢S¢ØVÊ HLl¡le¡j¡ c¢mm L−le ®cez fr¡¿¹−l 1/2/4ew ¢hh¡c£Ne
c¡h£ L−le ®k, e¡¢mn£ pÇf¢šl j§m j¡¢mL ¢R−me ®Lnh Q¾cÐ hp¡L HLb¡
paÉ Hhw Eš² ®Lnh Q¾cÐ hp¡L 1 ew m−Vl pÇf¢š Na 20.03.59 Cw
a¡¢l−M 1ew ¢hh¡c£ hl¡hl ®M¡o Lhm¡ c¢mm ®l¢S¢ØVÊ L−l ®ce Hhw 2 ew
m−Vl pÇf¢š Na Cw 20.03.59 a¡¢l−M 2/3 ew ¢hh¡c£ hl¡hl ®M¡o Lhm¡
c¢mm L−l ®cez ¢hh¡c£Ne c¡h£ L−le ®k, 1/2/3ew ¢hh¡c£ e¡¢mn£ pÇf¢š
h¡hc ®L¡e HLl¡le¡j¡ ®l¢S¢øÊ L−le ®ce e¡C Hhw 4 ew ¢hh¡c£J ®L¡e
HLl¡le¡j¡ ®l¢S¢øÊ L−l ®ce e¡Cz
e¡¢mn£ pÇf¢šl j§m j¡¢mL ¢R−me ®Lnh Q¾cÐ hp¡L Cq¡ Eiu frC ü£L¡l L−lez fËcnÑe£-6 ¢Q¢q²a 32 ew ¢p Hp M¢au¡−e ®Lnh Q¾cÐ
hp¡−Ll e¡−j fËÙºa qCu¡−R Hhw fËcnÑe£-7 ¢Q¢q²a 32/1 ew Hp H M¢au¡e ®Lnh Q¾cÐ hp¡−Ll e¡−j fÊÙºa qCu¡−Rz p¤al¡w ®Lnh Q¾cÐC ®k e¡¢mn£ pÇf¢šl j§m j¡¢mL Cq¡ A¡c¡m−al ¢eLV fËj¡¢Za qCu¡−Rz
e¡¢mn£ 1ew mVi¥š² pÇf¢š ®Lnh Q¾cÐ hp¡L 1ew ¢hh¡c£l ¢eLV ¢hœ²u L−l−R Cq¡ EiufrC ü£L¡l L−lz fÐcnÑe£-L ¢Q¢q²a Cw 20.3.59
a¡¢l−Ml 2534 ew j§m c¢mm cª−ø ®cM¡ k¡u ®k, e¡¢mn£ 1ew mVi¥š²
pÇf¢š ®Lnh Q¾cÐ hp¡L 1ew ¢hh¡c£ hl¡hl ®M¡o Lhm¡ ®l¢S¢ØVÊ c¡mm j§−m
¢hœ²u L−l−Rz Ae¤l¦fi¡−h e¡¢mn£ 2ew mVi¥š² pÇf¢š ®Lnh Q¾cÐ hp¡L
2/3 ew ¢hh¡c£l ¢eLV ¢hœ²u L−l−R Cq¡J Eiu frC ü£L¡l L−l, fÐcnÑe£-M ¢Q¢q²a 20.03.59 Cw a¡¢l−Ml 2536 ew j§m c¢mm cª−ø ®cM¡
k¡u ®k, e¡¢mn£ 2ew mVi¥š² −Lnh Q¾cÐ hp¡L 2/3 ew ¢hh¡c£ hl¡hl ®M¡o
Lhm¡ −l¢S¢ØVÌ c¢mm j§−m ¢hœ²u L−l−R, p¤al¡w e¡¢mn£ pÇf¢š ¢hœ²−ul
¢ho−u Eiuf−rl j−dÉ −L¡e ¢h−l¡d e¡Cz Eiu f−rl j−dÉ ¢h−l¡d£l
¢hou qCm HC ®k, e¡¢mn£ pÇf¢š −gl−al SeÉ 4ew ¢hh¡c£ c¤C¢V HLl¡le¡j¡ c¢mm L−l ¢c−u¢R−m ¢L e¡? Eš² HLl¡le¡j c¢mm §−m
e¡¢mn£ pÇf¢š M¡u M¡m¡p£ hå−L f¢lea q−u¢Rm ¢L e¡ ? 4ew ¢hh¡c£
BCeax Eš²l¦f HLl¡le¡j¡ c¢mm pÇf¡ce L−l ¢c−a A¢dL¡l£ ¢L e¡?
HC ¢h−l¡d£u fÐnÀ…¢m ¢e−jÀ d¡l¡ h¡¢qLi¡−h A¡−m¡Qe¡ Ll¡ qCmz
e¢b fkÑ¡−m¡Qe¡u ®cM¡ k¡u ®k, ¢hh¡c£Ne Aü£L¡l L¢l−mJ fÐcnÑe£-5 ¢Q¢q²a 2537 ew ®l¢S¢ØVÌ j¤−m HLl¡le¡j¡ c¢mm 1-3 ew ¢hh¡c£l ¢fa¡ 4 ew ¢hh¡c£ e¡¢mn£ 1ew mVi¥š² pÇf¢š ®Lnh Q¾cÐ hp¡L
hl¡hl L−l ¢c−u−Re Hhw a¡−a naÑ ¢Rm ®k, Ru j¡−pl j−dÉ ®Lnh Q¾cÐ
V¡L¡ ®gla ¢c−m e¡¢mn£ 1ew mVi¤š² pÇf¢š ®gla ®cu¡ qC−hz Ae¤l¦fi¡−h 2ew mVi¥š² pÇf¢š 2/3 ew ¢hh¡c£f−r 4ew ¢hh¡c£ 2535ew
HLl¡le¡j c¢mm L−l ®cu k¡q¡ fÐcnÑe£-3 ¢Q¢q²a qCu¡−Rz Eš² c¢m−m
naÑ A¡−R ®k, p¡a j¡−pl j−dÉ ®Lnh Q¾cÐ f−el V¡L¡ ®gla ¢c−m e¡¢mn£
2ew mVi¥š² pÇf¢š ®gla ®cu¡ q−hz e¢b fkÑ¡−m¡Qe¡u ®cM¡ k¡u ®k, ¢hh¡c£NZ Aü£L¡l L¢l−mJ Cq paÉ ®k 4ew ¢hh¡c£ Eš² c¤CM¡e¡ HLl¡le¡j¡ c¢mm L−l ¢c−u¢Rmz
President’s order Nos. 88 and 136 of 1972 and
No.24 of 1973 d¡l¡ pw−n¡¢da State Acquisition & Tenancy
Act (XXVIII) of 1951) section 95A ¢ejÀl©f “Notwithstanding anything contained in any other law
for the time being in force, any transfer of a holding or of
portion or share thereby, either by way of or out and out
sale with or agreement to recovery of where the
transferor receives from the transferee any consideration
and the transferee acquires the right to possess and to
enjoy the usufruct of such holding or portion of share
thereof for a specified period in lieu of such consideration shall not withstanding anything contained
in the document relating to the transfer, be deemed to be
a complete (eligible) mortgage for period not exceeding
seven years and the provisions of section 95 shall supply
to such transfer whether made before or after the date of commencement of the State Acquisition and Tenancy
(Second Amendment) order 1972.” 52 D.L.R. (AD) page
239.
e¢b fkÑ¡−m¡Qe¡ L¢lu¡ ®cM¡ k¡u ®k, Efk¤š² Section 95A
Ae¤k¡u£ J h¡c£l hZÑe¡ Ae¤k¡u£ e¡¢mn¡ pÇf¢š h¡hc (illegible) mortgage --- pª¢ø q−u−R h¢mu¡ Aœ¡c¡ma j−e L−lez ¢L¿º HC Section 95A Hl hmhv Ll−el ¢ho−u 32 DLR (AD) 1980, page
No. 246 Bangladesh vs. Haji Abdul Gani Bf£m j¡jm¡l
l¡−ul 11 cg¡u 4 J 5 ew Ef cg¡u hm¡ q−u−R ®k, ------ (4) those transaction which are subsisting on the date of promulgation of President’s Order No. 88 of 1972 are hit
by section 95A including the transaction entered into by
way of or out and out sale with or agreement to recovery,
made whether before or after the promulgation of the President’s Order No. 88 of 1972 and (5) as for the transaction which are not alive before the promulgation
of president’s Order No. 88 of 1972 they are concluded
by the transaction past and closed. h¡c£l hZÑe¡j−a e¡¢mn£ pj¤cu pÇf¢š ®gl−al Q¥¢š²−a 20.03.59 Cw a¡¢l−M ¢hœ²u Ll¡ quz ®p−r−œ BC−el ¢hd¡e Ae¤k¡u£ 20.03.66 Cw a¡¢lM Eš² (illegible) mortgage Hl ®ju¡c ®no q−u k¡u Ab¡Ñv k¡q¡ The promulgation
of President’s Order No. 88 of 1972 Hl hý f§−hÑC ®no q−u k¡u Hhw Efk¤š² BC−el ¢hd¡e Ae¤k¡u£ h¡c£l c¡h£ concluded the transaction past and closed q−u−Rz
The contract Act Hl section II Hl ¢hd¡e Ae¤k¡u£ e¡h¡m−Ll j‰−ml SeÉ e¡h¡mL f−r a¡q¡l BCe¡e¤N A¢ii¡hL Q¥¢š² L¢l−a f¡¢l−he, a−h Eq¡ AhnÉC p¡h¡m−Ll jwm¡−bÑ qC−a qC−h Hhw Q¥¢š²−a Eq¡ E−õM b¡¢L−a qC−hz j¤p¢mj BCe Ae¤k¡u£ ¢fa¡ e¡h¡m−Ll BCe¡e¤N A¢ii¡hLz ¢hh¡c£fr c¡h£ L−l ®k, 4ew ¢hh¡c£ 1-3 ew ¢hh¡c£
e¡h¡mL f−r Eš² HLl¡le¡j¡ c¢mm c¤¢V ®l¢S¢øÊ L−l ¢c−a A¢dL¡l£ eez
e¢b J Eš² HLl¡le¡j¡ c¢mm c¤C¢V fkÑ¡−m¡Qe¡ L¢lu¡ ®cM¡ k¡u ®k, 4ew
¢hh¡c£ e¡h¡m−Ll ®L¡e j‰m¡−bÑ Eš²l©f HLl¡le¡j¡ c¢mm ®l¢S¢øÊ L−l ¢c−u¢R−me a¡q¡ Eš² HLl¡le¡j¡ c¢m−m E−õM e¡Cz h¡c£frJ e¡h¡m−Ll
j‰−ml ¢hou¢V fËj¡−e Be£−a f¡−le e¡Cz Aœ¡c¡ma j−e L−le ®k, 4
ew ¢hh¡c£ e¡h¡mL f−r Eš² HLl¡le¡j¡ c¢mm c¤C¢V ®l¢S¢øÊ L−l ®cJu¡l
A¢dL¡l£ ¢R−me e¡z
Efk¤š² ¢hou pj§q fkÑ¡−m¡Qe¡ L¢lu¡ Aœ¡c¡ma HC ¢pÜ¡−¿¹ Efe£a qe ®k Aœ ¢hQ¡kÑ ¢hou ¢hh¡c£f−rl Ae¤L¨−mz
¢hQ¡kÑ ¢hou-2x
a¡j¡¢c BC−el Ae¤−µRc 114 Hl ¢hd¡e qCm ®k, ®L¡e Q¥¢š² ®ju¡c ®no q−u k¡h¡l fl Abh¡ Q¥¢š²−L Aü£L¡l L¢l−m ®pC ¢ce ®b−L
¢ae hR−ll j−dÉ Q¥¢š² f¡m−el c¡h£ E›¡fe L¢l−a qC−hz h¡c£fr Eš²
®ju¡−cl Q¥¢š²l ®ju¡c ®no qJu¡l ¢ae hR−ll j−dÉ E›¡fe L−le e¡Cz
®Lee¡ Q¥¢š²l −ju¡c ®no qu 1965 J 1966 Cw p¡−m Hhw c¡h£ E›¡f−el
pjup£j¡ ¢Rm 1968 J 1969 Cw p¡m fkÑ¿¹z HR¡s¡ ¢f, X¢hE Ô-1 ®Sl¡−a
ü£L¡l L−le ®k, “2 ew h¡c£ 1974 Cw a¡¢l−M ¢p/J (®l¢ix) Hl ¢eLV e¡¢mn¡ pÇf¢šl håL EÜ¡−ll j¡jm¡ L−l¢Rm k¡q¡ M¡¢lS q−u−R Hhw I
M¡¢lS B−c−nl ¢hl¦−Ü h¡c£fr Bf£m L−le e¡Cz ®pL¡l−e Eš² håL
EÜ¡−ll c¡h£ a¡j¡c£−a h¡¢la qC−a−R h¢mu¡ Aœ¡c¡ma j−e L−lez
p¤al¡w Aœ ¢hQ¡kÑ ¢hou ¢hh¡c£f−rl Ae¤L¨−m h¢mu¡ Aœ¡c¡ma j−e L−lez
¢hQ¡kÑ ¢hou 1/4x
Efk¤š² ¢hQ¡kÑ ¢hou pj§q Hhw e¢b fkÑ¡−m¡Qe¡ L¢lu¡ Aœ¡c¡ma j−e L−le ®k, h¡c£f−rl Aœ ®j¡LŸj¡ haÑj¡e BL¡−l AQm Hhw h¡c£fr a¡q¡−cl fË¡bÑ£a j−a ¢Xœ²£ f¡C−a f¡−le e¡z
¢hQ¡kÑ ¢hou-5x
p¡¢hÑL fkÑ¡−m¡Qe¡u Aœ¡c¡ma j−e L−le ®k, h¡c£fr Bl ®L¡e fË¢aL¡l f¡C−a qLc¡l e−qez fËcš ®L¡VÑ ¢g p¢WLz
AaHh,
B−cn
qCm ®k, h¡c£f−rl Aœ ®j¡LŸj¡ 1/2/4/5 ew ¢hh¡c£l ¢hl¦−Ü ®c¡alg¡ p§−œ Hhw 3 ew ¢hh¡c£l ¢hl¦−Ü HLalg¡p¤−œ öe¡e£ A−¿¹ ¢he¡ MlQ¡u ¢Xp¢jp Ll¡ qCmz
ü¡/- AØfø 31.03.99
−j¡x Cg−aM¡l ¢he B¢SS pqL¡l£ SS( i¡lfË¡ç) q¡¢Ljf¤l, ¢ce¡Sf¤lz
…l¦aÄf§ZÑ ¢hd¡u k¤NÈ ®Sm¡ SS (AbÑGZ), ¢ce¡Sf¤l LaѪL AeÉ fËL¡l Bf£m ®j¡LŸj¡ ew 72/1999-H ¢hNa Cw−lS£ 04.04.2002 a¡¢l−Ml l¡u ¢e−jÀ A¢hLm Ae¤¢mMe q−m¡x
“This appeal is directed against the judgment and decree dated 31.03.99 and 07.04.99 respectively passed and singed by Mr. Md. Iftekhar Bin Aziz, Assistant Judge, Hakimpur, Dinajpur in O.C. suit No. 20/96. The Ld. Court below dismissed the suit on contest against the defendant No. 1,2,4 and 5 and as such being aggrieved, the plaintiff/appellants preferred this appeal.
During pendency of this appeal plaintiff/appellant No. 1 and defendant/respondent No. 1 died and their heirs have accordingly been substituted as plaintiff/appellants No. 1(ka) -1(Gha) and defendant respondent Nos. 1(ka) -1 (illegible) respectively.
The case of the plaintiffs/ appellants in short, is that, the scheduled suit plot No. 53 measuring 1.94acres and plot No. 50 measuring 2.20 acres of kh. No. 32 of mouja nawdapara under P.S. Hakimpur, District Dinajpur originally belonged to Keshob Chandra, father of the plaintiffs. (illegible) to want of money Keshob Chandra proposed to mortgage the suit property to the defendant/respondent No. 4, father of the defendant/respondent No. 1-3 and the defendant/respondent No. 4 agreed to take mortgage the same in the benami of his 3 sons defendant/respondent Nos. 1,2,3. Accordingly on 20.03.59 keshob Chandra executed and registered a sale deed No. 2534 in favour of the defendant/respondent No. 1 under the guardianship of the father, defendant/respondent No. 4 for the suit land 1.74 acres out of 1.94 acres of plot No. 53 and kabala No. 2536 in favour of the defendant/respondent No. 2 and 3 under the guardianship of the father, defendant No. 4 for the suit land 1.00 acres out of 2.20 acres of plot No. 50 and at the same time the defendant/respondent No. 4 being guardian of the defendant No. 1,2,3 executed and registered two ekrarnama in favour of Keshob Chandra to give back property within 6 years 7 years respectively by receiving back the consideration money of the two kabalas. Keshob Chandra during his life time tried to received back the suit property but failed due to their male tactics of passing time, Keshob Chandra died in 1965 leaving behind the only heirs two sons plaintiff No. 1 & 2. The plaintiff’s tried to get back the suit land but the defendant played the same male tactics and at last on 15.07.96 they refused to give back. Hence, the suit for redemption.
On the other hand the case of the defendant/respondent Nos. 1,2,4 and 5 in short, is that, defendant No. 1, 2 and 3 from their own money purchased the suit land throughout and out sale deeds dated 20.03.59 and there was no stipulation for reconveyance. Moreover at that time the defendant No. 1,2,3 were minors and their father had no authority to execute the ecrarnamas and actually defendant No. 4 never executed any ecrarnama. The defendant/respondents have been owning and possessing the suit property and the plaintiff/appellants or their predecessor never claimed to get back the suit property. The defendant/respondent No. 5 purchased 50 dec. from suit plot No. 50 from defendant No. 3 on 06.02.90 and he has been owning and possessing this 50 dec. by mutating his name and by paying rent to the Govt.
During trial the Ld. court below framed following issues:-
1z Aœ ®j¡LŸj¡ haÑj¡e BL¡−l Q¢m−a f¡−l ¢Le¡?
2z Aœ ®j¡LŸj¡ a¡j¡¢c BC−e h¡¢la ¢Le¡?
3z e¡¢mn£ pÇf¢š−a h¡c£l üaÄ cMm ¢Qla−l qÙ¹¡¿¹¢la q−u−R ¢Le¡? 4z h¡c£ fË¡b£Ñaj−a håL EÜ¡l Hl ¢X¢œ² f¡C−a f¡−l ¢Le¡? 5z h¡c£ Bl ®L¡e fË¢aL¡l f¡C−a f¡−l ¢Le¡?
Considering the pleadings and evidences of the parties the Ld. court below observed that the suit is barred by limitation. The Ld. trial court believed the disputed two ekrarnama as genuine and also observed that the disputed transactions were actually usufructuary mortgages. But, relying upon the decision given in 32 (AD) page 246 referred by the defendant/respondent side, the Ld. court below observed that the disputed transaction are concluded by the principles of past and closed as the same were not alive before the promulgation of P.O. No. 88/72 and as such dismissed the suit.
The Ld. advocate for the plaintiff/appellants submits that the ld. lower court has failed to consider properly the pleadings and evidences of the parties and the provisions of the laws concerned and erred in law in dismissing the suit and as such occasioned serious failure of justice. He submits that the suit has been filed within the stipulated 60 years and as such the same is not at all barred by limitation. He further submits that the Ld. trial court rightly found the disputed transaction as usufructuary mortgage and as such the same never be concluded as pasted and closed on the principles of once a mortgage always a mortgage. He urges for allowing appeal and for decreeing the suit by setting aside the impugned judgment and decree.
On the other hand the Ld. advocate for the defendant/respondent submits that the Ld. lower court properly considered the pleadings and evidences of the parties and the provisions of laws and rightly dismissed the suit. He submits that the Ld. trial court disbelieved the disputed ekrarnamas and also submits that defendant No. 4 have no legal authority to contract on behalf of his minor children defendant No. 1, 2, 3 and the disputed transactions were actually out and out sale. He further submits that the suit was barred by misjoinder of cause of action under order 2 Rule 3 of C.P.C as the plaintiffs filed the suit in respect of two separate transactions. He urges for dismissing the appeal.
POINT FOR DETERMINATION
DISCUSSION AND DECISION
Point No. 2
Admittedly the plaintiff/appellants filed the suit for redemption claiming that their predecessor father had mortgaged the suit lands usufrutuary to the defendant/respondent No. 1-4. The defendant/respondent denied the plaintiff/appellants claim and they also claimed that the disputed transactions were actually out and out sale. Whether the transaction were actually usufructuary mortgage or out sale that is to be decided but, the question of limitation in no way depends upon that decision. The question of limitation is to be decided in dependently. The limitation period of the suit for redemption is, under Article 148 of the limitation Act, 60 years from the date of the accrual of right to (illegible) . In the instant case, the disputed transactions were held on 20.03.59 and the suit is filed on 05.10.96, that is, within 37 years from the transactions. So, in the case, the question of limitation does not at all arise. From the perusal of the judgment of the lower court it appears that, the ld. lower court decided the question of limitation considering the transactions as merely (illegible) and applied Article 114 of the limitation Act. It is needless to say that the ld. trial court misconceived the facts of this case and the provisions of the limitation Act and wrongly applied Article 114 of the said Act in this suit for redemption.
So the finding of the ld. lower court as to the limitation point is totally wrong and unjustified. The suit is not and was never barred by limitation.
Points Nos. 1,3,4,5:
All the points are taken together for the sake of convenient discussion and taking decision. Admittedly, the suit land originally belonged to Keshob Chandra, father of the plaintiff/appellants and he executed and registered the two kabalas dated 20.03.59 exhibit ‘ka’ and ‘kha’ in favour of the defendant/respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 3 under the guardianship of defendant/ respondent No. 4. The defendant/respondents claimed that the sais transfers were out and out sale, on the contrary, the plaintiffs/ appellants claimed that the transfers were actually usuafractuary mortgages and defendant/
respondent Nos. 1, 2 and 3 under the guardianship of
their father defendant/respondent No. 4 executed and registered the two ecrarnama in favour of Keshob Chandra on the same sitting to give back the suit property within 6 years and 7 years. The plaintiffs/appellants filed the two ecrarnamas as exhibit 3
and exhibit 5. The defendant/respondent claimed that defendant No. 4 never executed and registered the ecrarnamas exhibit 3 and 5 and he had no authority to execute and registered the ecrarnama on behalf of the defendant/respondent Nos. 1,2,3. The Ld. advocate for
the defendant/respondent submits that the ld. court below disbelieved the genuineness of this two ecrarnamas. But
from the perusal of the impugned judgment, it appears
that, the ld. court below observed that “e¢b fkÑ¡−m¡Qe¡u ®cM¡ k¡u ¢hh¡c£Ne Aü£L¡l L¢l−mJ Cq¡ paÉ ®k 3 ew ¢hh¡c£ Eš² c¤C M¡e¡ HLl¡l e¡j¡ c¢mm L−l ¢c−u−Rez So the submission of the ld. advocate for the defendant/respondent is not at all true.
The ld. court below believed the said two ekrarnamas. Moreover, from the perusal of the L.C. record it appears
that the kabalas dated 20.03.59 exhibit ‘ka’ and ‘kha’
and the ecrarnamas dated 20.0359 exhibit 3 and 5 have
been registered in the same date in consecutive nos. The
kabala in favour of the defendant/respondent No. 1
exhibit ‘ka’ has been registered as No. 2534 and the
kabala in favour of the defendant/respondent No. 2 and 3
exhibit ‘kha’ has been registered as No. 2536 and the ecrarnamas executed on behalf of defendant/respondent
Nos. 2 and 3 exhibit 3 has been registered as No. 2535
and the ecrarnama executed on behalf of defendant/respondent No. 1 exhibit 5 has been registered
as No. 2537. It also appears that all the two kabala and
the two ecrarnamas have been written by the same deed
writer Tashir Uddin and witnessed by the same witness
Riaz Uddin Mondal. Only the two kabalas exhibit ‘ka’ and ‘kha’ have been identified by plaintiff/appellant No. 1 Promoth Nath Bashak and the two ecrarnamas exhibit 3 and 5 have been identified by on Shafi Uddin Sarkar of village Gobindapur residence of the executants defendant/respondent Nos. 1-4. The defendant/respondents with-held defendant No. 4, the executant of the ecrarnamas exhibit 3 and 5 from examination before the court. considering the above facts and circumstances, it it evident that the two kabalas exhibit ‘ka’ and ‘kha’ and the two ecrarnamas exhibit 3 and 5 executed and registered in the same sitting at the same sherista of the same deed writer and as such there is no doubt that the defendant/respondent No. 4, father of the defendant/respondent Nos. 1, 2, 3 properly executed and registered the ecrarnamas. So, in this regard the observation made by the ld. court below is proper and just.
In view of the above facts and circumstances, it is evident that Keshob Chandra, father of the plaintiff/appellants transferred the suit property vide the two kabalas dated 20.03.59 exhibit ‘ka’ and ‘kha’ with the two registered agreements exhibit 3 and 5 for reconveying the the same within 6 and 7 years respectively. From perusal of the impugned judgment it appears that the ld. court below observed that the ecrarnamas exhibit 3 and 5 executed and registered by the defendant/respondent No. 4, father and guardian of the defendant/respondents Nos. 1,2, 3 on behalf of them and there have no mention about the legal necessity of the then minor defendant/respondents Nos. 1,2, 3 and as such the ld. court below held that the defendant/respondent No. 4 had no legal authority to execute and register the ecrarnamas. It is true that, the defendant No. 4, father and guardian of the defendant/respondent Nos. 1,2, 3 executed and registered
the ecrarnamas on behalf of the then minor defendant/respondents Nos. 1,2, 3 and there are no mention about the legal necessary of the then minor defendant/respondents Nos. 1,2, 3. But these two ecrarnamas cannot be considered separately and independently, as the same were not executed and registered for separate transaction. It is found that these
two ecrarnamas was executed and registered in connection with the two kabalas exhibit ‘ka’ and ‘kha’ which created only the two transaction. So the two ecrarnamas have to be considered together with the two kabalas. From the perusal of the impugned judgment it appears that the ld. court below also considered the kabalas together with the ecrarnamas and held that “e¢b fkÑ¡−m¡Qe¡ L¢lu¡ ®cM¡ k¡u ®k, EfkѤš² Sectin A Ae¤k¡u£ J h¡c£l hZÑe¡ Ae¤k¡u£ e¡¢mn£ pÇf¢š h¡hc usufractuary mortgage-pª¢ø qCu¡−R h¢mu¡ Bc¡ma j−e L−lez” But in view of the decision made
in 32 DLR (AD) page 246 the ld. court below held that
the transaction made on 20.03.59 have been concluded
by the principles of past and closed. Be that as it may, it
is true that Keshob Chandra transferred the suit properties vide the two kabalas exhibit ‘ka’ and ‘kha’ in favour of the then minor defendant/respondents Nos. 1,2,
3 under the guardianship of their father defendant/respondent No. 4 with the registered agreements exhibit 3 and 5 executed and registered by defendant/respondent No. 4 father and guardian of the defendant/respondent No. 1,2, 3 on behalf of them. So the
suit property was transferred to the then minor defendant/respondents Nos. 1,2, 3 under the guardianship of their father defendant No. 4 with the agreements to reconvey. So the question of legal authority of the defendant/respondent No. 4 does not at all (illegible).
We have already found that the Ld. court below considered the two transactions as unufractuary mortgages, in view of the decision made in 32 DLR (AD) 246 referred by the defendant/respondents the Ld. court below held the two transactions concluded by the principles of past and closed. It is true that, in the ecrarnamas there were stipulation to reconvey the suit properties within 1372 BS corresponding to 1965 and 1371 BS corresponding to 1964 and the period have already expired long before 03.08.72, the date of coming into force of section 95A. The defendant/respondent referred the case Abdul Khaleque –Vs- Abdul Khaleque reported in 1 BLC (AD) page 90 in which the honourable appellate division held that “Admittedly the mortgage was for 4 years and the period having already expired long before 03.08.72 section 95A have no application to the transaction which was past and closed.” So it is clear that section 95A of S. A. & T Act has no application to the transaction which are not alive and has expired long before 03.08.72. So, there is no doubt that in the instant transactions of this suit section 95A cannot be applicable. But it is also true that this instant suit is not at all u/s 95A of S. A & T Act. The plaintiff/appellants filed this suit for redemption as a regular suit. So the principle of past and closed has no manner of application in the instant transactions of this suit as the honourable appellate division held in the case Abubakar –Vs- Nazir Ahmed reported in 34 DLR (AD) page 237. From the perusal of the judgment of the honourable appellate division in the case reported in 1 BLC page 90 it appears that the honourable appellate division considered the transaction vied a registered kabala with a separate registered agreement to recovery dated 24.06.67 as usufractuary mortgages. But as the case was u/s 95A of S. A & T Act, their lordships gave the decision mentioned above. In view of the above facts and circumstances, I am of the opinion that the disputed transaction of this instant suit are actually usufractuary mortgages and once a mortgage always a mortgage and in this regular suit of redemption the part and closed principle is not at all applicable. The Ld. court below have failed to considered that the suit is not at all u/s 95A of S. A. & T Act and wrongly applied the principle of past and closed.
The Ld. advocate for the defendant/respondents submits that the plaintiffs/appellants suit suffers from serious defect of misjoinder of cause of actions as the suit is instituted in respect of this two separate transactions vied two kabalas and two ecrarnamas. It is true that, the suit has been instituted for redemption of two separate mortgages but the parties are same. Moreover, the plaintiffs/appellants paid advolerum court fees for the two redemption. Further more, in the proviso of Rule 4 under Order 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure it has been provided that nothing in Rule 4 shall be deemed to prevent any party in a suit for force closure of redemption fro, asking to be put in the mortgage property. And in Rule 7 under order 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure it has been provided that all objections on the ground of misjoinder of cause of action shall be taken at the earliest possible opportunity and, in all cases where issues are settled at or before such settlement, unless the ground of objection has subsequently arisen, and any such objection not so taken shall be deemed to have been (Illegible). From the perusal of the impugned judgment and from the perusal of we the filed by defendant it appears that, the defendant/respondents did not at all rais the ground of misjoinder of causes of action at the earliest opportunity and as such of objection is now deemed to have been waived. So in the appeal the defendant/respondent cannot raise the objection.
Considering the above facts and circumstances it is evident that, defendant/respondent Nos. 1, 2, 3 are the mortgage of the suit properties. So the defendant/respondent No. 5, subsequent transferee from defendant No. 3 acquired no better title over the suit plot than the defendant No. 3. Defendant No. 5 is also deemed to be a mortgagee according to the provisions of section 59A of the transfer of property Act, 1882.
In view of the above facts and circumstances, I am of the opinion that the Ld. court below have failed to consider properly the pleadings and evidences of the parties and also the provisions of law concerned and arrived at a wrong decision in dismissing the suit. So the impugned judgment and decree is not at all justifiable and sustainable in law and as such the same warrants interference by this court.
Court fee paid is correct,
Hence,
ORDERED
That the appeal is allowed on contest against the defendant/respondent Nos. 1, 2, 4 and 5 and exparte against the rest without cost and the impugned judgment is hereby set aside. The O. C. Suit No. 20/96 be decreed on contest against the defendant No. 1, 2, 4 and 5 and exparte against the rest without cost. The suit property is hereby redeemed from the mortgages and the defendants are directed to deliver up the documents and possession of the suit property to the plaintiffs within 30 days.
Send down the L. C. R. along with a copy of this judgment.
Dictated & corrected by me.
Sd/- Md. Moyeedul Islam Sd/- Md. Moyeedul Islam Joint District Judge Joint District Judge (Artha Rin), Dinajpur. (Artha Rin), Dinajpur.
Bl¢S ®j¡a¡−hL h¡c£f−r l fСbÑe¡-
(L) Bl¢Sl ag¢pmi ¥š² pÇf¢š h¡c£ f−r l Ae¤L¨−m håL EÜ¡−ll
(Redemption for Mortgage) ¢Xœ²£ ¢c−a;
pÇf¡ce J ®l¢S¢øÌ L−l ¢c−a;
Hhw
®Lnh Q¾cÐ hp¡L e¡¢mn£ pÇf¢šl j¡¢mL ¢R−mez ®Lnh Q¾cÐ hp¡L p¡j¢uL V¡L¡l fÐ−u¡S−e e¡¢mn£ pÇf¢š håL ¢c−a BNËq£ q−m 4ew ¢hh¡c£ Eš² pÇf¢š håL NËqZ Ll−a CµR¤L qez ®p ®j¡a¡−hL ®Lnh Q¾cÐ hp¡L 4ew ¢hh¡c£ q−a 1ew ag¢pmi ¥š² S¢j h¡hc 2,000/- V¡L¡ NËqZ L−l 1ew ¢hh¡c£l e¡−j −l¢S¢øÌ c¢mm ew- 2534 a¡¢lM- 20.03.1951 pÇf¡ce L−l ®ce Hhw HLC ¢ce HLC ¯hW−L 4ew ¢hh¡c£ 1ew ¢hh¡c£l f−r ®Lnh Q¾cÐ hp¡−Ll hl¡h−l ®l¢S¢øÌL«a HLl¡le¡j¡ c¢mm ab¡ ®glv c¢mm ew- 2537 a¡¢lM 20.03.1959 pÇf¡ce L−l ü£L¡l J A‰£L¡l L−le −k, h¡wm¡ 1366 p¡m q−a 1371 p¡−ml j−dÉ 06 (Ru) hvpl ®ju¡−cl j−dÉ f−Zl V¡L¡ ®gla ¢c−m ¢a¢e 1ew ag¢pmi ¥š² S¢j ®Lph Q¾cÐ hl¡h−l ®gla ¢c−a h¡dÉ b¡L−hez Afl¢c−L, 4ew ¢hh¡c£ q−a 2ew ag¢pmi ¥š² pÇf¢š h¡hc B−l¡ 2,000/- NËqZ Llax 2-3 ew ¢hh¡c£l e¡−j ®l¢S¢øÌc¢mm ew- 2536 a¡¢lM- 20.03.1959 pÇf¡ce L−l ®ce Hhw HLC ¢ce HLC ¯hW−L 2ew ag¢pmi ¥š² pÇf¢š h¡hc 2-3ew ¢hh¡c£l f−r −Lph Q¾cÐ hp¡L hl¡h−l ®l¢S¢øÌL«a HLl¡le¡j¡ c¢mm ew- 2535 a¡¢lM 20.03.1959 pÇf¡ce L−l A‰£L¡l L−le −k, 1366 p¡m ®b−L 1372 p¡m 07 (p¡a) hvpl ®ju¡−cl j−dÉ f−Zl V¡L¡ ®gla ¢e−u ®Lnh Q¾cÐ hl¡hl ®gla håL£ c¢mm fÐc¡e Ll−hez AeÉb¡u Bc¡ma−k¡−N ®Lph Q¾cÐ a¡ Bc¡u L−l ¢e−hez
Ef¢l¢õ¢Ma c¢mmàu pÇf¡ceL¡−m 1-3ew ¢hh¡c£NZ e¡h¡mL ¢R−me Hhw a¡−cl ¢eSü −L¡e aq¢hm ¢Rme¡z 4ew ¢hh¡c£ a¡l ¢eSü A−bÑ J ü¡−bÑ pÇf¡¢ca qJu¡u c¢mmàu Hhw ®glv c¢mmàu pÇf¡ce L−lez
AbÑ¡v ¢hNa Cw−lS£ 20.03.1959 a¡¢l−M p¡gLhm¡ c¢mmàu Hhw HLl¡le¡j¡ ab¡ ®glv Q¤¢š²l c¢mmàu HLC p¡−b pÇf¡ce Ll¡ q−u−Rz
Ef¢l¢õ¢Ma HLl¡le¡j¡ c¢m−ml ¢ho−u ¢hh¡c£œu a¡−cl Sh¡−hl 10ew fÉ¡l¡u h−me ®k, “e¡¢mn£ S¢j M¢lcL¡−m ®L¡e ®glv Lhm¡l Q¤¢š² h¡c£N−el ¢fa¡l p¢qa ¢Rme¡z h¡c£Ne Aœ ®j¡LŸj¡ L¢lu¡ ®glv Lh¡m¡ Q¤¢š²l Lb¡ fÐL¡n L¢lu¡−Rez h¡Ù¹−h ®L¡e ®glv Lh¡m¡l Q¤¢š²−a ¢hh¡c£Ne e¡¢mn£ S¢j M¢lc L−le e¡Cz Eš²l©f ®glv Lh¡m¡l Lb¡ C¢af§−hÑ ®L¡e¢ce fÐL¡n f¡u e¡Cz Eš²l©f ®glv Lhm¡l Q¤¢š² Ll¡l A¢dL¡l HC e¡h¡mL ¢hh¡c£N−el f−r a¡q¡−cl ¢fa¡l ¢Rme¡z ¢a¢e ®L¡e ®glv Lh¡m¡ Q¤¢š² L−le e¡Cz ¢h−œ²a¡ ®Lnh Q¾cÐ hp¡L a¡q¡l S£hj¡−e ®L¡e ¢ce e¡¢mn£ S¢j ®glv c¡h£ L−le e¡Cz ¢a¢e ®cn ü¡d£e qCh¡l AÒf f§−hÑ j¡l¡ ¢Nu¡−Rez ¢a¢e jªa¥ÉL¡maL e¡¢mn£ S¢j ®glv Hl c¡h£ L−le e¡Cz ab¡L¢ba ®glv Lh¡m¡l Q¤¢š² hq¡m e¡C h¡ b¡¢L−a f¡−l e¡z HC h¡c£NZ hªÜ qCu¡ f¢su¡−Rez a¡q¡l¡J ®L¡e ¢ce e¡¢mn£ S¢j ®glv e¡e¡ Q¤¢š²l Lb¡ fÐL¡n L−le e¡C h¡ c¡h£ L−le e¡Cz HC ¢hh¡c£Ne fСu 25-30 hvpl f§−hÑ p¡h¡mL qCu¡−Rez ah¤J ®Lq ®L¡e ¢ce Eš² ®glv Lh¡m¡l Q¤¢š²l Lb¡ fÐL¡j L−le e¡Cz 4ew ¢hh¡c£ HLSe fСu A¢n¢r a J NË¡j£e pqS plm ®m¡L h−Vz fr ¡¿¹−l ®Lnh Q¾cÐ hp¡L HLSe fÐi¡hn¡m£ pò¡¿¹ O−ll ¢n¢r a ®m¡L ¢R−mez ¢a¢e A¢a ®N¡f−e k¢c ®L¡e ®glv Lh¡m¡l c¢mm pª¢ø L¢lu¡ b¡−Le a−h Eq¡l à¡l¡ HC ¢hh¡c£NZ h¡dÉ e−qez HC h¡c£NZ Aœ ®j¡LŸj¡ Beue L−le e¡Cz a¡q¡−cl f¤œ le¢Sv Q¾cÐ hp¡L HLSe L¥MÉ¡a ®cE¢mu¡ J ®j¡LŸj¡h¡S ®m¡Lz ¢a¢e Cc¡¢ew h¡c£N−Zl e¡j hÉhq¡−l Aœ ¢jbÉ¡ ®j¡LŸj¡ Beue L¢lu¡−Rez h¡c£N−el Aœ ®j¡LŸj¡ MlQ¡pq ¢Xp¢jp qC−hz”
¢X, X¡¢hÔE-1 ¢q−p−h Bh¤m L¡−nj a¡q¡l Sh¡eh¢¾c−a h−me, “B¢j 1ew ¢hh¡c£z 2ew ¢hh¡c£ Bj¡l i ¡Cz AeÉ¡eÉ ¢hh¡c£ f−r p¡r £ ¢c¢µRz eJc¡ f¡s¡ ®j±S¡l 2.75 naL S¢j ¢e−u j¡jm¡z e¡¢mn£ S¢jl j§m j¡¢mL −Lnh Q¾cÐ hp¡Lz 4ew ¢hh¡c£ Bj¡l h¡h¡z Bj¡l h¡h¡l Ù»£ ¢aeSe Hhw h¡h¡l ®R−m 11 Sez ®Lnh Q¾cÐ e¡¢mn£ S¢j B¢j Bh¤m L¡−nj, B¢SS¡l lqj¡e J Bh¤m L¡m¡j BS¡c hl¡hl c¤¢V c¢mm j§−m ¢hœ²u L−lez aMe Bjl¡ e¡h¡mL ¢Rm¡jz Bj¡−cl j¡, Bj¡l j¡ J 2/3ew ¢hh¡c£l j¡ e¡¢mn£ S¢j h¡hc V¡L¡ f¢l−n¡d L−lez”
−Sl¡u HC p¡r £ h−me ®k, “Bj¡l h¡h¡ S£¢ha B−Rez 1-3ew ¢hh¡c£l j−dÉ B¢j ®R¡Vz hs B¢SS¡l lqj¡ez B¢SS¡l lqj¡e 2ew ¢hh¡c£z p¡r £ ¢c−a B−pe¢ez”
¢X, X¡¢hÔE-1 Bh¤m L¡−n−jl hš²hÉ j−a ¢hh¡c£œ−ul h¡h¡ S£¢haz p¤al¡w ¢a¢e Bc¡m−a H−p hm−a f¡l−ae ®k ¢a¢e E−õ¢Ma ®glv Q¤¢š² c¢mm¢V pÇf¡ce L−le e¡Cz ¢hh¡c£œu a¡−cl ¢m¢Ma Sh¡−hl ®L¡b¡J h−me e¡C ®k 1ew ¢hh¡c£l f−r 4ew ¢hh¡c£ LaѪL ®l¢S¢øÌL«a HLl¡le¡j¡ c¢mm ew- 2537 a¡¢lM 20.03.1959 Hhw 2- 3ew ¢hh¡c£l f−r 4ew ¢hh¡c£ LaѪL ®Lnh Q¾cÐ hp¡L hl¡h−l ®l¢S¢øÌL«a HLl¡le¡j¡ c¢mm ew- 2536 a¡¢lM 20.03.1959 S¡m Hhw S¡¢mu¡¢aj§mLi ¡−h pª¢Saz Hje¢L ¢X, X¡¢hÔE-1 Bh¤n L¡−nj a¡l Sh¡eh¢¾c−aJ Ef¢l¢õ¢Ma ®l¢S¢øÌL«a HLl¡le¡j¡ c¢mm S¡m j−jÑ c¡h£ L−le e¡Cz ¢hh¡c£œu ®l¢S¢øÌL«a HLl¡le¡j¡ c¢mm ew- 2537 Hhw 2536 a¡¢lM 20.03.1959 h¡¢a−ml ¢e¢j−š ®L¡e ®j¡LŸj¡ ®L¡e Bc¡ma c¡¢Mm L−le¢ez HacÚ¢ho−u ¢h‘ ¢hQ¡¢lL Bc¡ma a¡l l¡−u E−õM L−l−Re ®k, “eb£ fkÑ¡−m¡Qe¡u ®cM¡ k¡u −k, ¢hh¡c£Ne Aü£L¡l L¢l−mJ Eq¡ paÉ −k 4ew ¢hh¡c£ Eš² c¤CM¡e¡ HLl¡le¡j¡ c¢mm L−l ¢c−u¢Rmz” g−m H¢V hm¡l A−fr ¡ l¡−Me¡ ®k, ®l¢S¢øL«a HLl¡le¡j¡ c¢mm ew- 2535 Hhw 2537 a¡¢lM 20.03.1959 °hd c¢mmz
pÇf¢š qÙ¹¡¿¹l BCe, 1882 Hl d¡l¡ 58(O) Hhw d¡l¡ 60 ¢e−jÀ A¢hLm Ae¤¢mMe q−m¡x
Usufructuary mortgage- 58(d) Where the mortgagor delivers possession [or expressly or by implication binds himself to deliver possession] of the mortgaged property to the mortgagee, and authorises him to retain such possession until payment of the mortgage-money, and to receive the rents and profits accruing from the property [or] any part of such rents and profits and to appropriate the same] in lieu of interest, [or] in payment of the mortgage-money, or partly in lieu of interest or partly in payment of the mortgage-money, the transaction is called an usufructuary mortgage and the mortgagee an usufructuary mortgagee.
60. Right of mortgagor to redeem- At any time after the principal money has become due, the mortgagor has a right, on payment or tender, at a proper time and place, or the mortgage- money, to require the mortgagee (a) to deliver to the mortgagor the mortgage-deed and all documents relating to the mortgaged property which are in the possession or power of the mortgagee, (b) where the mortgagee is in possession of the mortgaged property, to deliver possession thereof to the mortgagor, and (c) at the cost of the mortgagor either to re-transfer the mortgaged
property to him or to such third person as he may direct, or to execute and (where the mortgage has been effected by a registered instrument) to have registered an acknowledgement in writing that any right in derogation of his interest transferred to the mortgagee has been extinguished:
Provided that the right conferred by this section has not been extinguished by the act of the parties or by decree of a Court.
The right conferred by this section is called a right to redeem and a suit to enforce it is called a suit for redemption. Nothing in this section shall be deemed to render invalid any provision to the effect that, if the time fixed for payment of the principal money has been allowed to pass or no such time has been fixed, the mortgagee shall be entitled to reasonable notice before payment or tender of such money.
BCe L¢jne LaѪL fÐL¡¢na BCe-në−L¡o hC−u Usufructuary Mortgage (M¡CM¡m¡¢p håL) pÇf−LÑ hm¡ q−u−R ®k-
usufructuary mortgage M¡CM¡m¡¢p håL ®k-hÉ¢š²l Ae¤L¨−m M¡CM¡m¡¢p håL ¢hcÉj¡ez The Transfer of Property Act, 1882
Hl 58(¢X) d¡l¡- Ae¤p¡−l, kMe c¡a¡ NËq£a¡−L hå¢L pÇf¢šl cMm AfÑZ L−le, fÐaÉr h¡ f−l¡ri¡−h cMm ¢c−a ¢e−S−L h¡dÉ L−le, Hhw hå¢Ll V¡L¡ f¢l−n¡d e¡ qJu¡ fkÑ¿¹ cMm l¡¢Mh¡l Ae¤j¢a ®ce, Hhw HCl©f pÇf¢š qC−a Eá§a M¡Se¡ J m¡i h¡ HCl©f M¡Se¡ h¡ m¡−ilAwn¢h−no NËq−Zl Ae¤j¢a ®ce, Hhw Eq¡ hå¢L V¡L¡l p¤c h¡ hå¢L V¡L¡ f¢l−n¡−dl SeÉ h¡ Eq¡l Bw¢nL p¤c f¢l−n¡−dl SeÉ Hhw Bw¢nL hå¢L V¡L¡ f¢l−n¡−dl SeÉ hÉu L¢l−a Ae¤j¢a ®ce, aMe a¡q¡−L M¡CM¡m¡¢p håL h−mz
…l¦aÅf§ZÑ ¢hd¡u The State Acquisition and Tenancy Act, 1950 Hl d¡l¡ 2 Hl Efd¡l¡ (6) Hhw Efd¡l¡ (9), d¡l¡ 44 Hhw 95 ¢e−jÀ A¢hLm Ae¤¢mMe q−m¡x
2. (1) -------------------------
44. Acquisition and vetting of the interest of proprietors, tenure- holders and other rent-receivers and of certain khas lands in the Government and the consequences thereof- Notwithstanding anything contained in any other law for the time being in force or in Chapter II of this Act or in any contract, but subject to the provisions of clauses (a), (b), (c) and (d) of sub-section (4) of section 3 and sub-section (3) of section 46E, on the publication of a notification in the official Gazette under sub-section (2) of section 43, declaring that a Compensation Assessment-roll has been finally published, the following consequences shall ensue, namely:-
respective estates, of all the tenure-holders in their respective tenures and of all other rent-receivers in the holdings or tenancies respectively let out by such rent- receivers within the area to which such roll relates or in such parts of such estates, tenures or holdings, or tenancies, as the case may be, as are within such area including the interests of all such proprietors, tenure- holders and other rent-receivers in all lands comprised in such estates, tenures and holdings or tenancies or part of such estates, tenures and holdings or tenancies within such area which are in the khas possession of such proprietors, tenure-holders and other rent-receivers and the interests of all such rent-receivers in all sub-soil including any rights to minerals in such estates, tenures and holdings or tenancies or part of such estates, tenures and holdings or tenancies within such area other than the interests which have already been acquired under Chapter II or sub- section (3) of section 46E shall, with effect from the first day of the agricultural year next following the date of publication of such notification in the official Gazette , be deemed to have been acquired by the Government and vest absolutely in the Government free from all encumbrances but subject to the right of such proprietors, tenure-holders and other rent-receivers specified in clause (2);
receiver, whose interests in any estate, tenure or holding or tenancy or in any part of any estate, tenure or holding or tenancy, as the case may be, within the area to which such roll relates, are acquired under this Act, shall, with effect from the first day of the agricultural year next following the date of publication of such notification in the official Gazette , be entitled to retain possession of an hold, subject to the provisions of this Act, as a tenant directly under the Government all lands of which he is entitled to retain possession under Chapter IV and, be liable to pay rent for such lands to the Government ;
under-raiyats and non-agricultural tenants in all lands held by such raiyats, under-raiyats and non-agricultural tenants within the area to which such roll relates in excess of the lands of which such raiyats, under-raiyats or non- agricultural tenants are entitled to retain possession under Chapter IV, including the interests in the sub-soil of all lands so held in excess and all rights to minerals therein other than the interests which have already been acquired under any other provision of this Act shall, with effect from the first day of the agricultural year next following the date of publication of such notification on the official Gazette , be deemed to have been acquired by the Government and vest absolutely in the Government free from all encumbrances;
and other tenants holding lands, within the area to which such roll relates, immediately before the first day of the agricultural year next following the date of such publication of such notification, shall, with effect from the first day of the said agricultural year, if they have not already become tenants directly under the Government under any other provision of this Act, become tenants directly under the Government and shall have the right to continue to hold, subject to the provisions of this Act, as tenants under the Government such of those lands as have not vested in the Government under item (3) or under any other provision of this Act and shall be liable to pay rent to the Government in respect of the lands so continued to be held;
with interest, if any, payable therein other than the arrears, cesses and interest referred to in clause (b) of sub-section (4) of section 3, remaining lawfully due on the first day of the agricultural year next following the date of such publication of such notification in respect of any estate within the area to which such roll relates shall, after the first day of the said agricultural year, continue to be recoverable from the outgoing proprietor by whom they were payable, and shall, without prejudice to any other mode of recovery, be recoverable by the deduction of the amount of such arrears and cesses and interest from the compensation money payable to such proprietor under this Act, when so ordered by the Collector;
(6) all amounts, recoverable by the Government from a rent-receiver under the Bengal Embankment Act, 1882 or the East Bengal Embankment and Drainage Act, 1952, which remain outstanding on the first day of the agricultural year next following the date of such publication of such notification and are not already covered by clause (d) of sub-section (4) of section 3, whether on account of arrear dues or dues under future instalments under the Bengal Embankment Act, 1882 or the East Bengal Embankment and Drainage Act, 1952, shall, without prejudice to any other mode of recovery, be recoverable by deduction of the amount of such arrear and future instalments from the compensation money payable to such rent-receiver in respect of the interests of lands to which such outstanding amounts relate, when so ordered by the Collector;
[(6a) all arrears of agricultural income-tax recoverable by the Government from a person under the Bengal Agricultural Income-tax Act, 1944, which remain outstanding on the first day of the agricultural year next following the date of such publication of such notification and are not already covered by clause (dd) of sub-section (4) of section 3, shall, without prejudice to any other mode of recovery, be recoverable by the deduction of the amounts of such arrears from the compensation money payable to such person under section 58 in respect of the interests or lands to which such outstanding amounts relate, when so ordered by the Collector;]
interest, if any, due thereon, in respect of any period previous to the first day of the agricultural year next following the date of such publication of such notification, which have accrued due in respect of any tenure, holding or land to which such roll relates, and which have not been barred by limitation or have not already vested in the Government under clause (c) of sub-section (4) of section 3, shall, on and from the first day of the said agricultural year, vest in and be recoverable by the Government and shall, without prejudice to any other mode of recovery, be recoverable from the persons by whom they were payable by the deduction of the amount of such arrears, cesses and interest from the compensation money, if any, payable to such persons under section 58, when so ordered by the Collector;
year next following the date of such publication of such notification, the ad interim payments under section 6, in respect of the rent-receiving interests or lands for which compensation has been assessed in the Compensation Assessment-roll to which such notification relates, shall cease; and the total amount of ad interim payments made under sub-section (1) or (2) or (4a) of the said section in respect of any such interests or lands, less an amount calculated at the rate of three per centum per annum on the amount of compensation assessed for such interests or lands in such roll from the date from which ad interim payments for such interests or lands became payable under that section till the last day of the agricultural year in which such notification is so published, shall be deducted from the amount of such compensation.
95. Limitation on mortgage or raiyati holdings- (1) Notwithstanding anything contained in any other law for the time being in force, a raiyat shall not enter into any form of usufructuary mortgage other than a complete usufructuary mortgage in respect of his holding or of a portion or share thereof, and every such complete usufructuary mortgage shall be subject to the same limitations as are imposed by section 90 on a transfer of the holding of a raiyat or of any share or portion thereof; and the period for which such complete usufructuary mortgage may be entered into by any raiyat shall not exceed, by any agreement express or implied, seven years:
Provided that any such usufructuary mortgage may be redeemed at any time before the expiry of the said period, on payment of an amount which shall bear the same proportion to the total consideration money received by the mortgagor, as the unexpired period bears to the total period for which the mortgage had been entered into.
registered under the Registration Act, 1908.
does not fulfil any of the conditions specified in sub-section (1) or is not registered as required under sub-section (2) it shall be void.
[(4) Notwithstanding anything contained in any other law for the time being in force, if any mortgagee prevents the redemption of a usufructuary mortgage under the proviso to sub- section (1) or refuses to restore any land covered by a usufructuary mortgage after the expiry of the period of such mortgage, the mortgagor may apply to the Subdivisional Magistrate or to any officer authorised in this behalf by the Government, for such redemption or restoration and, on such application and, in the case of redemption, also on payment by the applicant of the amount due to the mortgagee under the said proviso, the Subdivisional Magistrate or the officer so authorised
shall pass an order directing the mortgagee to restore possession of the mortgaged land to the applicant and to deliver up to the applicant all documents in his possession or power relating to the mortgaged land by such date as may be fixed in the order.]
(5) If the mortgagee does not restore possession of the mortgaged land to the mortgagor by the date fixed under sub- section (4), the Subdivisional Magistrate [or any Officer authorised in this behalf by the Government shall, on application made by the mortgagor, put the applicant in possession of such land by evicting the mortgagee therefrom and may, for such eviction, use or cause to be used such force as may be necessary.]
The State Acquisition and Tenancy Act, 1950 Hl 44 d¡l¡ ®j¡a¡−hL l¡ua (raiyat) q−m¡ ¢e−S Abh¡ a¡l f¢lh¡−ll pcpÉN−Zl à¡l¡ Abh¡ i «aÉNZ h¡ nТjLN−Zl à¡l¡ h¡ p¡q¡−kÉ Abh¡ Awn£c¡lNZ h¡ hNÑ¡c¡lN−Zl pq¡ua¡u Q¡o Ll¡l E−Ÿ−nÉ plL¡−ll Ad£−e pl¡p¢l S¢jl ®i ¡NcM−ml A¢dL¡l m¡i L−l−Re Hje hÉ¢š²z
Afl¢c−L “complete usufructuary mortgage” ab¡ f§ZÑ M¡uM¡m¡¢p håL Hl pw‘ ¡ The State Acquisition and Tenancy Act, 1950 Hl d¡l¡ 2 Efd¡l¡ (6)-H fÐcš q−u−Rz Eš² d¡l¡ ®j¡a¡−hL “complete usufructuary mortgage” ab¡ f§ZÑ M¡uM¡m¡¢p håL qm pÇf¢šl cM−ml A¢dL¡l£ ®L¡e fÐS¡ LaѪL Hje HL fÐL¡l qÙ¹¡¿¹l k¡l E−ŸnÉ q−m¡ håL b¡L¡L¡m£e pj−u håL£ i ¨¢j q−a fСç pLm j¤e¡g¡ à¡l¡ ANË£j Nªq£a npÉ ®glv fÐc¡el Abh¡ ANË£j Nªq£a V¡L¡ f¢l−n¡d h¡ Ahp¡e qJu¡l ¢eÕQua¡ fÐc¡e L−lz
The Transfer of Property Act, 1882 Hhw The State Acquisition and Tenancy Act, 1950 −j¡a¡−hL c’¤dl−el håL f¡Ju¡ k¡uz fÐbj¢V “usufructuary mortgage” ab¡ M¡uM¡m¡¢p håLz ¢àa£u¢V q−m¡ “complete usufructuary mortgage” ab¡ f§ZÑ M¡uM¡m¡¢p håLz
The State Acquisition and Tenancy Act, 1950 Hl d¡l¡ 95 ®j¡a¡−hL l¡ua L«¢o S¢jl f§ZÑM¡uM¡m¡¢p håL ab¡ “complete usufructuary mortgage” R¡s¡ AeÉ ®L¡e fÐL¡l håL fÐc¡e Ll−a BCea A¢dL¡l£ eez p¤al¡w HV¡ Ly¡−Ql ja Öfø ®k, 1950 p¡−ml fl HLSe l¡ua a¡l L«¢o S¢jl f§ZÑ M¡uM¡m¡¢p håL ab¡ “complete usufructuary mortgage” R¡s¡ Bl AeÉ ®L¡e fÐL¡l håL fÐc¡e Ll−a f¡l−he e¡z 1950 p¡−ml BC−el Ef¢l¢õ¢Ma 95 d¡l¡ ®j¡a¡−hL Eš² f§ZÑM¡uM¡m¡¢p håL ab¡ “complete usufructuary mortgage” Hl ®ju¡c p−hÑ¡µQ 15 hvpl ¢Rmz flhaÑ£−a 1969 p−el 21ew AdÉ¡−cn ®j¡a¡−hL Eš² ®ju¡c p−hÑ¡µQ 7 (p¡a) hvpl ¢edÑ¡lZ Ll¡ quz
…l¦aÅf§ZÑ ¢hd¡u h¡wm¡−cn plL¡l LaѪL ¢hNa Cw−lS£ 03.08.1972 p¡−m fÐL¡¢na ®N−SV¢V ¢e−jÀ A¢hLm Ae¤¢mMe q−m¡x
[Published in the Bangladesh Gazette, Extraordinary, Part IIIA, dated the 3rd August 1972]
GOVERNMENT OF THE PEOPLES REPUBLIC OF BANGLADESH MINISTRY OF LAW AND PARLIAMENTARY AFFAIRS
(Law Division)
NOTIFICATION
No. 619-Pub.-3rd August, 1972- The following Order made by the President, on the advice of the Acting Prime Minister, of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh on the 2nd August, 1972, is hereby published for general information:-
GOVERNMENT OF THE PEOPLES REPUBLIC OF BANGLADESH MINISTRY OF LAW AND PARLIAMENTARY AFFAIRS
(Law Division)
President’s Order No. 88 of 1972
THE STATE ACQUISITION AND TENANCY (SECOND AMENDMENT) ORDER, 1972.
WHEREAS it is expedient further to amend the State Acquisition and Tenancy Act, 1950 (E. B. Act XXVIII of 1951), for the purposes hereinafter appearing;
Now, THEREFORE, in pursuance of the Proclamation of Independence of Bangladesh, read with the Provisional Constitution of Bangladesh Order, 1972, and in exercise of all powers enabling him in that behalf, the President is pleased to make the following Order:-
and Tenancy (Second Amendment) Order, 1972.
(2) It shall come into force at once.
B. Act XXVIII of 1951) (hereinafter referred to as the said Act), in section 95, after sub-section (3), the following new sub-sections shall be added, namely:-
“(4) Notwithstanding anything contained in any other law for the time being in force, if any mortgage prevents redemption of a usufructuary mortgage under the proviso to sub-section (1), the mortgagor may apply to the Sub-divisional Magistrate for such redemption and, on such application, the Sub-divisional Magistrate shall, on payment by the applicant of the amount due to the mortgagee under the said proviso, pass an order directing the mortgagee to restore possession of the mortgaged land to the applicant and to deliver up to the applicant all documents in his possession or power relating to the mortgaged land by such date as may be fixed in the Order.
(5) If the mortgagee does not restore possession of the mortgaged land to the mortgagor by the date fixed under sub- section (4), the Sub-divisional Magistrate shall, on application made by the mortgagor, put the applicant in possession of such land by evicting the mortgagee therefrom and may, for such eviction, use or cause to be used such force as may be necessary.” “Treatment of certain transaction as usufructuary mortgage.
section shall be inserted, namely:-
95A. Notwithstanding anything contained in any other law for the time being in force, any transfer of a holding or of a portion or share thereof, where the transferor receives from the transferee any consideration and the transferee acquires the right to possess, and to enjoy the usufruct or, such holding or portion or share thereof for a specified period in lieu of such consideration, shall notwithstanding anything contained in the document relating to the transfer, be deemed to be a complete usufructuary mortgage for a period not exceeding seven years and the provisions of section 95 shall apply to such transfer whether made before or after the date of commencement of the State Acquisition and Tenancy (Second Amendment) Order, 1972.”
ABU SAYEED CHOWDHURY President of the
People’s Republic of Bangladesh
AZIMUDDIN AHMAD Deputy Secretary.
Ef¢l¢õ¢Ma l¡øÊf¢al B−cn ®j¡a¡−hL The State Acquisition and Tenancy Act, 1950 Hl d¡l¡ 95 Hl fl ea¥e HL¢V d¡l¡ pwk¤š² qu k¡ ¢ejÀl©fx
[95A. Treatment of certain transactin as usufructuary mortgage- Notwithstanding anything contained in any other law for the time being in force, any transfer of a holding or of portion or share thereof, [either by way of an out and out sale with an agreement to reconvey,] [or] where the transferor receives from the transferee any consideration and the transferee acqires the right to possess, and to enjoy the usufruct of such holding or portion or share thereof for a specified period in lieu of such consideration, shall notwithstanding anything contained in the document relating to the transfer, be deemed to be a complete usufructuary mortgage for a period not exceeding seven years and the provisions of section 95 shall apply to such transfer whether made before or after the date of commencement of the State Acquisition and Tenancy (Second Admendent) Order, 1972] (President’s Order No. 88 of 1972).
1972 p¡−ml Ef¢l¢õ¢Ma l¡øÌf¢al B−cn ew- 88 ®j¡a¡−hL Eš² B−cn S¡l£ qJu¡l f§−hÑ ¢Lwh¡ f−l ®glv Q¤¢š²l c¢mm pqL¡−l pÇf¡¢ca qÙ¹¡¿¹l c¢mm h¡ p¡gLhm¡ c¢mm p−hÑ¡µQ 07 (p¡a) hvpl ®ju¡c£ f§ZÑM¡uM¡m¡p£ håL h¡ “complete usufructuary mortgage” ¢q−p−h NZÉ q−hz AbÑ¡v 1972 p¡−ml l¡øÌf¢al
B−cn 88 Ae¤k¡u£ −kph qÙ¹¡¿¹l c¢mm h¡ p¡gLhm¡ c¢m−ml p¡−b ®glv Q¤¢š²l c¢mm h¡ HLl¡le¡j¡ c¢mm h¡ håL£ pÇf¢š ®glv f¡Ju¡l c¢mm pÇf¡ce Ll¡ b¡L−h ®pph c¢mm qÙ¹¡¿¹l c¢m−ml jkÑ¡c¡ f¡−he¡z f¡−h “complete usufructuary mortgage” ab¡ f§ZÑ M¡uM¡m¡¢p håL c¢m−ml jkÑ¡c¡z k¡l ®ju¡c q−h p−hÑ¡µQ 7 (p¡a) hvplz BC−el ¢hd¡e ®j¡a¡−hL 7 (p¡a) hvpl fl håL NËq£a¡l Eš² f§ZÑ M¡uM¡m¡¢p håL c¢mm¢V HL¢V j§mÉq£e c¢m−m f¢lZa q−hz HR¡s¡J håL NËq£a¡ Eš² pÇf¢š Eš² p−hÑ¡µQ ®ju¡c 7 (p¡a) hvpl A¢ah¡¢qa qJu¡l p¡−b p¡−b ¢he¡ h¡LÉ hÉ−u håL c¢mm c¡a¡−L a¡l pÇf¢š ®gla fÐc¡e Ll−a BCea c¡uhÜz
nÉ¡jfc ¢pwq¡ Hhw AeÉ¡eÉ he¡j d£−l¾cÐ e¡b i â Hhw AeÉ¡eÉ ®j¡LŸj¡u (¢fHm¢X 1957 Y¡L¡ 488) ®j¡LŸj¡u A¢i ja fÐc¡e Ll¡ qu ®k,
“There is nothing in law to prevent the parties from entering into a simultaneous agreement for sale of resale. The two agreements in such a case are interdependent in the sense that the agreement upon one part of the bargain may well have promoted agreement as to the rest and so long as they are intended to be effected as a separate and independent transactions out right sale followed by reconveyance- they are both legal and provable in law. The option in such cases given to the vendor to have a resale of the property is an undertaking by the purchaser of which the sale of by vendor forms the consideration and therefore, gives rise to a mutually enforceable contract. The vendor in such a case by executing the sale had already performed the part assigned to him and, as such, the vendee having taken the benefit of the performance by the vendor of his part of the contract cannot be allowed to resile from his undertaking.
Where the kabala and the ekrarnama were executed on the same day and at the same sitting, it was held that they formed contemporaneous agreements and the consideration for the ekrarnama was in part the execution of the kabala and the transfer of the lands thereby made. [pp. 491, 492] A & B.
−j¡x e¡¢pl¦õ¡q Hl jªa¥É−a a¡l Ju¡¢ln ®j¡p¡Çjv S¡u…e ¢h¢h J AeÉ¡eÉ he¡j ®j¡x ¢Su¡E¢Ÿe M¡e J AeÉ¡eÉ [28 ¢hHm¢X (H¢X) f¡a¡ 185] ®j¡LŸj¡u A¢i ja fÐc¡e Ll¡ qu ®k,
“In the impugned judgment we further held that the mortgage deed Exhibit-2 is of the year 1936 and the High Court Division held that the right of redemption shall accrue after 12 years from 1936, dated of mortgage deed and the suit has been filed within a period of 60 years. Accordingly both the courts below committed a gross error of law in construing the President’s Order No. 88 of 1972 and in holding that the mortgage deed was executed in 1936 and section 95 of the State Acquisition of tenancy Act was amended by promulgation of President’s Order No. 88 of 1972 with effect from 03.08.1972 and the transaction is a past and closed one, overlooking the vital fact that the mortgagor’s right of redemption within a period of 60 years has not been taken away by President’s Order No. 88 of 1972 a quick remedy has been made available to a raiyat but it did not in any way affect the long practiced remedy of the right of redemption of mortgage by filing a suit within a period of 60 years from the date of accrual of the right of redemption. In other words the jurisdiction of the civil court of entertain such a suit remained unaffected as before.”
h¡wm¡−cn he¡j Bë¥m N¢Z ¢hnÄ¡p Hhw AeÉ¡eÉ [(Bangladesh Vs. Abdul Gani Biswas and others) 32 DLR (AD) 233] −j¡LŸj¡u A¢i ja fÐc¡e Ll¡ qu ®k,
“President’s Order Nos. 88 and 136 of 1972 and No. 24 of 1973 are all valid legislation for effecting necessary amendments in the East Bengal State Acquisition and Tenancy Act and those laws cannot be attacked on the ground of ultra vires; (2) any transfer of a holding or part thereof by a rayiat either by way of out and out sale with an agreement to reconvey or where the transferor receives from the transferee any consideration and transferee acquires the right to possess and enjoy the usufruct, shall notwithstanding any thing contained in the document relating to the transfer, be deemed to be a complete usufructuary mortgage for a period of maximum 7 years and the provisions of section 95(4) and (5) of the S. A. T. Act shall apply to such transfer; (3) and such transfers are not to be understood in the light of the Transfer of Property Act because those are to be understood in the light of the enactment in question; (4) those transactions which are subsisting on the date of promulgation of President’s Order N. 88 of 1972 are hit by section 95A including the transaction entered into by way of an out and out sale with an agreement to recovery, made whether before or after the promulgation of President’s Order No. 88 of 1972; and (5) as for the transactions which were not alive before the promulgation of President’s Order No. 88 of 1972 they are concluded by the transactions past and closed.”
Bh¤ h‚ l -he¡j- e¡¢Sl Bq−jc [(Abu Bakkar Vs. Nazir Ahmed) 34 DLR (AD) 237] ®j¡LŸj¡u A¢i ja fÐc¡e Ll¡ qu ®k,
“Section 95 has been again amended by the President’s Order No. 88 of 1972 with effect from 3 August 1972, but this amendment did not touch the period of a usufructuary mortgage which is still 7 years, nor did it affect the period of limitation for redemption suit which is 60 years. The amendment relates to two new provisions, One is that if, on the expiry of the period of a mortgage, the mortgagee does not restores possession of the land to the mortgagor, then the Sub-divisional Magistrate shall, on an application be the mortgagor, restore possession to the mortgagor by evicting the mortgagee. In other words, for getting back possession of a mortgaged land the mortgagor need not file any redemption suit, but may get quick remedy by an application to the Sub-divisional Magistrate, The other provision in the amendment is that notwithstanding anything contained in any other law in force, any transfer of a land by an out and out sale with a condition for reconveyance shall be deemed to be a complete usufructuary mortgage for a period not exceeding 7 years on the expiry of which the mortgagor may get back possession by an application to the Sub-divisional Magistrate. The High Court Division in view of its own conclusion that the transaction under Ext. A is an out and out sale, considered whether this sale should be deemed to be a usufructuary mortgage and found that the transaction was past and closed. But since the transaction is, as we have found, a mortgage no question arises whether is should be treated as mortgage.”
The State Acquisition and Tenancy Act, 1950 Hl d¡l¡ 95, The State Acquisition and Tenancy Act, 1950 Hl pw−n¡de£ 1969 p−el 21 ew AdÉ¡−cn Hhw 1972 p¡−ml B−cn ew- 88 Ae¤k¡u£ l¡ua (raiyat) ab¡ Q¡o Ll¡l E−Ÿ−nÉ plL¡−ll Ad£−e pl¡p¢l S¢jl ®i ¡NcM−ml A¢dL¡l£ LaѪL “L«¢o S¢jl”-
(L) f§ZÑ M¡uM¡m¡¢p håL (complete usufructuary mortgage) hÉa£a AeÉ pLm fÐL¡l håL ®hBCe£z
q−m håL c¡a¡ p¡h¢X¢i ne¡m jÉ¡¢S−ØVÌV Abh¡ plL¡l LaѪL ¢edÑ¡¢la LjÑLaÑ¡l ¢eLV B−hce Ll−a qLc¡l Hhw Eš² p¡h¢X¢i ne¡m jÉ¡¢S−ØVÌV Abh¡ plL¡l LaѪL ¢edÑ¡¢la LjÑLaÑ¡ håL NËq£a¡−L E−µRc f§hÑL håL c¡a¡−L håL£ pÇf¢šl cMm fÐc¡e Ll−he j−jÑ BC−e hm¡ b¡L−mJ fÐL«a f−r haÑj¡e p¡h-¢X¢i ne¡m jÉ¡¢S−ØVÌV fc¢V ¢hm¤çz g−m Eš² BCe pw−n¡de e¡ qJu¡ fkÑ¿¹ HM¢au¡lpÇfæ Bj¢m Bc¡m−a håL c¡a¡ Eš² B−hce¢V Ll−he Hhw Bj¢m Bc¡ma A¢a â¦a håL c¡a¡−L håLL«a pÇf¢šl cMm fÐc¡e Ll−hez
Aœ ®j¡LŸj¡l h¡c£àu nУ fÐjb e¡b hp¡L Hhw nУ l−jn Q¾cÐ hp¡−Ll ¢fa¡ ¢R−me jªa ®Lnh Q¾cÐ hp¡Lz 1ew ¢hh¡c£l f−r f§ZÑ M¡uM¡m¡¢p håL£ c¢mm ew- 2537 Hhw 2 J 3ew ¢hh¡c£l f−r f§ZÑ M¡uM¡m¡¢p håL£ c¢mm ew- 2536 Aœ 4ew ¢hh¡c£ ¢hNa Cw−lS£ 20.03.1959 a¡¢l−M Eš² ®Lnh Q¾cÐ hl¡h−l pÇf¡ce L−l ¢c−u¢R−mez c¢mm ew- 2537 Hl ®ju¡c ¢Rm Ru hvpl Hhw c¢mm ew- 2536 Hl ®ju¡c ¢Rm p¡a hvplz AbÑ¡v 2537 ew c¢mm¢Vl hå−Ll ®ju¡c pj¡ç q−u¢Rm ¢hNa Cw−lS£ 20.03.1965 a¡¢l−M Hhw Afl 2536 ew håL c¢mm¢Vl ®ju¡c pj¡ç q−u¢Rm ¢hNa Cw−lS£ 20.03.1966 a¡¢l−Mz a¡j¡¢c BC−el Ae¤−µRc 148 ®j¡a¡−hL ®ju¡c Eš£−ZÑl 60 (o¡V) hvp−ll j−dÉ ®j¡LŸj¡ c¡−u−ll pjup£j¡l j−dÉ Aœ ®j¡LŸj¡l h¡c£àu ¢hNa Cw−lS£ 05.10.1996 a¡¢l−M håL ®gl−al Aœ ®j¡LŸj¡¢V c¡−ul L−l−Rez h¡c£àu c¡¢m¢mL J ®j±¢ML p¡r É EfÙÛ¡fe f§hÑL Bl¢Sl hš²hÉ ab¡ ®j¡LŸj¡ fÐj¡e Ll−a pr j q−u−Rez ¢h‘ B¢fm Bc¡m−al l¡u¢V Ef¢l¢õ¢Ma B−m¡Qe¡ J fkÑ¡−m¡Qe¡l ¢i ¢š−a hq¡m ®k¡NÉz
AaHh B−cn qu ®k, Aœ l¦m¢V ¢he¡ MlQ¡u M¡¢lS Ll¡ q−m¡z
k¤NÈ ®Sm¡ SS (AbÑGZ), ¢ce¡Sf¤l LaѪL AeÉ fËL¡l Bf£m ®j¡LŸj¡ ew 72/1999-H
fÐcš ¢hNa Cw−lS£ 04.04.2002 a¡¢l−M fÐcš l¡u J ¢Xœ²£ (¢X¢œ² ü¡r−ll a¡¢lM 10.04.2002) Haà¡l¡ hq¡m l¡M¡ q−m¡z
Aœ l¡u J B−c−nl Ae¤¢m¢f j¡ee£u j¿»£, BCe, ¢hQ¡l J pwpc ¢houL j¿»Z¡mu−L C-−jCm Hl j¡dÉ−j f¡W−e¡l SeÉ ®l¢SøÊÊ¡l ®Se¡−lm−L ¢e−cÑn fËc¡e Ll¡ q−m¡z
Aœ l¡u J B−c−nl Ae¤¢m¢f A¡Ce L¢jn−el j¡ee£u ®Qu¡ljÉ¡e j−q¡cu−L C-®jCm Hl j¡dÉ−j f¡W¡−e¡l SeÉ ®l¢SøÊÊ¡l ®Se¡−lm−L ¢e−cÑn fËc¡e Ll¡ q−m¡z
AhN¢a J Ae¤pl−Zl SeÉ Aœ l¡u J B−c−nl Ae¤¢m¢f AdÙ¹e Bc¡m−al pLm ¢hQ¡lL−L C-−jCm Hl j¡dÉ−j f¡W−e¡l SeÉ ®l¢SøÊÊ¡l ®Se¡−lm−L ¢e−cÑn fËc¡e Ll¡ q−m¡z
Aœ l¡u J B−c−nl Ae¤¢m¢f Judicial Administration Training Institute (JATI)-H C-−jCm Hl j¡dÉ−j f¡W¡−e¡l SeÉ ®l¢SøÊÊ¡l ®Se¡−lm−L ¢e−cÑn fËc¡e Ll¡ q−m¡z
Aœ l¡u J B−c−nl Ae¤¢m¢f h¡wm¡−cn p¤fУj ®L¡VÑ BCeS£h£ p¢j¢apq h¡wm¡−c−nl pLm BCeS£h£ p¢j¢a−a C-−jCm Hl j¡dÉ−j f¡W¡−e¡l SeÉ ®l¢SøÌ¡l ®S¡e¡−lm−L ¢e−cÑn fÐc¡e Ll¡
q−m¡z
Aœ l¡−ul Ae¤¢m¢fpq AdxÙ¹e Bc¡m−al e¢b pw¢nÔø Bc¡m−a â¦a ®fÐlZ Ll¡ ®q¡Lz