দায়বর্জন বিবৃতি (DISCLAIMER)

এই ওয়েবসাইটে প্রকাশিত রায় বা আদেশ আপনি google translation এর মাধ্যমে বাংলায় দেখতে পাচ্ছেন তা সুপ্রীম কোর্ট কর্তৃক বাংলায় অনূদিত নয়। জনসাধারণের বিচার-প্রক্রিয়ায় সহজ অভিগম্যতা নিশ্চিতকরণের অভিপ্রায়ে বাংলায় অনূদিত রায়-আদেশ দেখার ব্যবস্থা রাখা হয়েছে। অনূদিত রায় বা আদেশের অনুলিপি সইমোহরী/জাবেদা নকলের (certified copy) বিকল্প হিসেবে অথবা অন্য কোন উদ্দেশ্যে ব্যবহার করা যাবে না। রায় ও আদেশ বাস্তবায়নের ক্ষেত্রে মামলার নথিতে বিধৃত মূল রায় বা আদেশ প্রণিধানযোগ্য।
Microsoft Word - W.P. No. 8802 of 2016 _LST-ors._.docx

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BANGLADESH HIGH COURT DIVISION

(SPECIAL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION)

Writ Petition No. 8802 of 2016.

IN THE MATTER OF:

An application under Article 102 of the Constitution of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh.

-And-

IN THE MATTER OF:

Md. Amir Hossain and others.

…Petitioners

-V E R S U S-

Nurul Amin and others.

                                             …....Respondents

Mr. A.S.M. Sharif Newaz, Advocate

…..For the petitioners Mr. Sk. Shaifuzzaman, DAG with

Ms. Rehana Sultana, AAG and

Mr. Md. Salim Azad, AAG and

Mr. Md. Samiul Alam Sarkar, AAG and

Ms. Zulfia Akhter, AAGs

                           …. For the respondents

Present:

Mr. Justice K.M. Kamrul Kader

And

Mr. Justice Khizir Hayat

Heard and Judgment On: 17.01.2024.

K. M. Kamrul Kader, J :

On an application under Article 102 of the Constitution of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh this Rule Nisi was issued on 30.07.2017, in the following terms:

“Let a Rule Nisi be issued calling upon the respondents to show cause as to why the impugned order dated 13.10.2015 delivered by the respondent No.8 cancelling the B.S. record in Annexure-‘E-1’ should not be declared illegal without lawful authority

and is of no legal effect and/or such other or further order or orders pass as to this Court may seem fit and proper.”


1

This Rule Nisi was issued on the ground that the Government has not yet been established any Land Survey Appellate Tribunal under Section 145B of the SAT Act. Due to this reason, the petitioners have failed to redress their grievances by filing appeal against the order, judgment and decree passed by the concerned Tribunal.

Mr. Sk. Shaifuzzaman, learned Deputy Attorney General submits that the government has already been published Gazette for establishing Land Survey Appellate Tribunal in different districts and the petitioners of the writ petition may redress their grievances by filing appeal, before the respective Land Survey Appellate Tribunal of the respective districts and as such, he prays for discharging the Rule.

It appears that in the meantime, the Government has already established the Land Survey Appellate Tribunal in the respective districts vide Gazette notification dated 11.07.2023 to hear the appeal arising out of judgment and decree and/or order of the Land Survey Tribunal in different districts. Considering the facts and circumstances of the matter, we are of the view that the petitioners may redress their grievances by filing appeal, before the Land Survey Appellate Tribunal, Dhaka  and as such, the Rule issued by this Court has became infructuous.

In the result, the Rule is disposed of with direction. The petitioners are at liberty to prefer appeal within 03(three) months from the date of receipt of the order, if any, before the Land Survey Appellate Tribunal, Dhaka and in preferring such appeal delay occurred, if any, shall be condoned. 

 In the meantime, the order of stay granted at the time of issuance of the Rule shall  continue till filling of  the appeal  before the  Land Survey Appellate Tribunal or 03(three) months from the date of receipt of this order, whichever is earlier.

The learned Advocate for the petitioners are permitted to take back the certified copies of the annexures by substituting the Photostat copy of the same.

There will be no order as to costs.

Office is directed to communicate the judgment and order to the petitioners and respondents at once.

Khizir Hayat, J:

I agree.