Judgment : High Court Division Full List
 
Case Type
Case/Tender Number
Year
Parties
Short Description
 

Case Number Parties Short Description
51
Mohammad Israfil vs. The state
disposed of
52
Mohammad Moinuddin and others -Versus- Bangladesh Bank and others
Discharged for non-prosecution
53
Sinha Foods Ltd -Versus- Bangladesh Bank and others
Discharged for non-prosecution
54
Md. Saddam Hossain and another-Vs-The state
55
Sree Anik Saha-Vs-The State
56
Md. Sadek and others-Vs-The state
57
Younus-Vs-The State
58
Rowsanara Begum Joshna -Versus- District Judge, Dhaka and others
Non-prosecution
59
Manik-Vs-The State
60
Md. Billal Hossain-Vs-The state
61
Md. Monirul Islam-Vs-The State
62
Mohammad Israfil Vs. The state and another
disposed of
63
Md. Abul Hossain-Vs-The State
64
Md. Alamgir-Vs-The State
65
Md. Nazim Dhali @ Md. Nazim Uddin-Vs-The State
66
Md. Jewel-Vs-The State
67
Md. Rayhan Mia alias Sohan-Vs-The State
68
Md. Himel Sheikh-Vs-The State
69
Monir Gazi-Vs-The State
70
Md. Kawsar Shikder-Vs- The state
71
Regent Energy and Power Limited and another vs Customs, Excise and VAT Appellate Tribunal, Dhaka and others.
It is an admitted position of facts that challenging the impugned order dated 22.02.2021 passed by the respondent No.2 the petitioner preferred Customs Appeal No. 170 of 2021 under Section 196A of the Customs Act, 1969. However, in preferring the appeal before the Tribunal a delay of 1(one) month and 19(nineteen) days has occurred due to the reason as stated therein. The Tribunal concerned ultimately dismissed the appeal having not been convinced about the cause of delay so has occasioned while preferring the appeal. The power to condone the delay by the Tribunal is discretionary. However, taking into consideration of the facts that for dismissal of the appeal the petitioner has become non-suited, and also, considering justice, equity and fair play we are inclined to interfere in the instant matter.
72
Md. Abdus Sattar. …. Defendant No.2-Appellant. Vs. Md. Tamser Ali Mondal and others. .... Respondents.
73
Mosammat Rahima Khatun VS Md. Sirajullah and others
74
Nikunja Howlader being dead his legal heirs 1(a) Madhab Howlader and others VS Hare Krishna Howlader and others
75
Dr. Md. Mobarak Ali and another Plaintiffs-Appellants-Petitioners Versus Kala Mia and others Defendants-Respondents-Opposite Parties Mr. Mrinal Kanti Biswas, Advocate for the plaintiffs-appellants-petitioners Mr.Rafi Ahmed, Advocate for the defendants-respondents-opposite parties
76
Md. Khokon Howladar and others Defendants- Appellants-Petitioners Versus Abdur Rashid Hawladar Plaintiff-Respondent-Opposite Party Mr. Manjurul Alamgir, Advocate for the defendants-appellants-petitioners Mr. Md. Mahbubur Rahman, Advocate for the opposite party No. 1
77
Swairachar O Sampradaiyikata Protirodh Committee and others Vs The Government of Bangladesh and others
78
Md. Abu Sayeed Vs.Mosmmat Beauty Khatun
Absolute.
79
The State vs Md. Saiful Islam alias Khokon
80
Md. Ismail -Versus- Chairman, Chattogram Port Authority and others
The Rule is made absolute in part
81
Md. Omar Faruk @ Almas @ Jahangir @ Bass-Vs-The state
82
Rahis-Vs-The State
83
Khan Mohammad Shahabuddin -Versus- The Mayor Dhaka City Corporation and others ……Respondents
Dhaka North City Corporation.
84
Damru @ Irfan-Vs-The State
85
Md. Miladun-Vs-The State
86
Md. Md. Babu and another-Vs-The State
87
Md. Moazzam Hossain-Vs-The State
88
Md. Kawser Ahmed-Vs-The State
89
Abul Kasem-Vs-The State
90
Md. Moniruzzaman Moni @ Chamra Monir-Vs-The State
91
Rabiul Islam-Vs-The State
92
Nahid Hasan alias Ridoy-Vs-The State
93
Md. Azim Khan alias Biddut-Vs-The State
94
Md. Rony-Vs-The State
95
Md. Abzal Matbbar-Vs-The state
96
Khorshedul Islam alias Khorshed-Vs-The state
97
Mezbah Uddin Chowdhury-Vs-The State
98
Md. Masud Rana @ Broker Masud-Vs-The State
99
Noju Sarker and others-Vs-The State
100
Md. Alim-Vs-The State