Judgment : High Court Division Full List
 
Case Type
Case/Tender Number
Year
Parties
Short Description
 

Case Number Parties Short Description
551
Manu Mia being dead his heirs-Shariful Begum and others VS. Ramiz Mia being dead his heirs- Josna Begum and others
552
Paschim Durduri Jugiram Pukur Par Masjid, represented by its Motwalli Jamal Ahmad vs. Samshul Islam
ABSOLUTE IN PART
553
Abdul Latif Sikder and others Vs. Most. Jakia Begum and others
554
Md. Abul Hasan Vs. Mst. Riva Akter
555
Md. Abul Kalam Vs. The State
556
Government of the people`s Republic of Bangladesh and others Vs. Shahadat Hossain and another
557
Govt. of Bangladehs Vs. Mst. Hamida Khan Rozi and others
Appeal is dismissed.
558
Md. Hossen Mullik and others Vs. Md. Aminul Mullik and others
559
The State Vs. Md. Shah Alam
Rejected
560
A. Wahab Mia and others .... Petitioners -VersusMostak Bepari and another ....Opposite-parties
561
Noor Begum and others … Plaintiffs-Appellants. -VersusTahera Begum and others …Defendants-Respondents.
562
Md. Nazim Imtiaz --- Defendant-Appellant-Petitioner. -VersusDilshad Shobnom --- Plaintiff-Respondent-Opposite party.
563
Ishrat Amin Vs.Md. Shahjahan Miah alias Majnu Miah and others
In the event of violation of a decree of permanent injunction, the decree is enforceable by taking recourse to the provision of Order XXI rule 32(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure and not by a fresh suit but where willful disobedience of the order of injunction is alleged, such violation must be proved by cogent, independent and reliable evidence and the Court must be satisfied upon inquiry and on consideration of the materials on record before passing order under Order XXI rule 32 of the Code of Civil Procedure that the judgment-debtor has willfully disobeyed or violated injunction in defiance of the majesty of law. If violation is proved, the decree of permanent injunction can be executed by attachment of the property or putting the judgment debtor in civil imprisonment or by both or directing the judgment-debtor for making delivery of possession of the dispossessed property in favour of the decree-holder.
564
Hairsadhan Samaddar and another vs. Govt of BD and ors
The name of the petitioners are recorded in the Draft Khatian (DP)
565
Mst. Firoza Khatun and others vs. Govt of BD
a specific allotment of 3 (three)Khata of plots in favor of the petitioners in the project namely "extended Uttara 3rd part project residential area".
566
Kiron Mondol and others Vs. Palash Mondol and others
567
Md. Ziaul Haque Vs. Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Finance.
Discharged
568
Mosammat Joynob Bibi alias Moroni Vs. Deputy Commissioner, Dhaka
Absolute
569
Afroza Begum being dead her heirs: Md. Monir (dead) and others Vs. M. A. Quddus Shaikh and others.
Disposed of
570
Manik Barua and others Vs. Bijoy Mondol and others.
Disposed of
571
Md. Abu Taleb and others Vs. Aziz Reza and others.
Disposed of
572
Mohammed Rejaul Kader and others Vs. Enayet Ullah
Disposed of
573
Md. Moneam hossain vs the state and another
574
Md. Kowsar and others....…Petitioners (In Writ petition No. 2283 of 2020) Md. Mahtab Uddin and other ...........Petitioners (In Writ Petition No. 15115 of 2017) -V E R S U S- The Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Rural Development and Co-operatives, Local Government Division, Bangladesh Secretariat, Dhaka and others......Respondents
Service Matter. Palli Sonchoy Bank
575
Md. Jakir Hossain and others ...Petitioners-V E R S U S- Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Local Government, Rural Development and Co-operative, Bangladesh Secretariat, Dhaka and others.…….Respondents
Service Matter. Palli Sonchoy Bank
576
Md. Abdul Quddus Makhan -Vs - The state
Discharged
577
578
Md. Abdul Aziz Prang being dead his legal heirs Shahton Begum Meher Neka and others vs. Abdul Gafur Prang and others
ABSOLUTE
579
580
Abdul Basit and another vs. Tahmina Akter Koli
Guardianship of minor child
581
Md. Bachchu Mia Vs. Md. Shah Alam and others
582
Md. Bachchu Mia Vs. Md. Shah Alam and others
583
Nitai Chandra Arjya and another .... Petitioners -Versus- Santosh Chandra Arjya and others .…Opposite parties
584
Peoples Insurance Company Limited, represented by its Chief Executive Officer (In charge) and another -Versus- Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Finance, Bank and Financial Institutions Division, Bangladesh Secretariat, Segunbagicha, Ramna, Dhaka and others
585
The State vs. Md. Khalil
Accepted
586
Md. Nizam Uddin @ Md. Nejam Uddin -Versus- The State and another
587
Sheikh Ekram Hossain (Jahid) and another -Vs- Most. Saleha Khatun, being dead, her heirs: Sheikh Shamsul Alam and others
The appellate court, as the final court of the finding of facts, affirms the trial court`s Judgment on a proper assessment of evidence on record, there is no misreading of material evidence, and the findings do not suffer from any error of law.
588
Omar Ali -Vs- Sree Kartik Chgandra Sarker and another
An ex-parte judgment and decree can be set aside on two grounds: (I) that the summons was not duly served or (II) that any sufficient cause prevented him from appearing when the suit was called on for hearing.
589
Dr. Rajib Kumar Goswami and another -Vs- Md. Al Mamun Kha
The foundation for the exercise of the power under this rule is the fulfilment of the two requirements of rule 21 of Order 11 of the Code. The first is the failure of the interrogated party to comply with any order to answer the interrogatory, and the second is the interrogatoring party applying to the court to impose the penalty.
590
Mojibul Hoque vs the state and another
591
Anwar Hosssain vs the state and another
592
Md. Ashraf Ali Khan, son of late Abdul Latif and another.-Vs-Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh represented by the Deputy Commissioner, Dhaka, Collectorate Bhaban, Police Station- Kotwali, District- Dhaka and others.
Dismissed
593
Md. Fokruzzaman Topu vs the state
594
Md. Bashir Ahmed Versus Nasima Akter and Others
595
Badiul Alam Dobash being dead, his heir: 1(a)-Wahedul Alam Dobash -Vs- Jarina Khatun being dead, her heirs: 1(a) Lutfunnessa and others
The provision of section 50 of the Waqfs Ordinance, 1962, in an unambiguous term, vested authority upon the Administrator of Waqfs to decide title and ownership of a property to be waqf property like an ordinary civil court with the help of evidence or other materials on record while releasing the same from the waqf estate but without doing so, the Administrator of Waqfs undersigned by the Deputy Administrator in a very cursory refused to entertain the application of the respondent.
596
Md. Haidar Kamal and others Vs. Md. Fariduddin and others
597
598
Md. Jamal Uddin Vs. Most. Tahmina Akhter and others
599
Abdul Barek, son of late Abdul Hamid of village- Sataish, Police Station- Tongi, District- Gazipur.-Vs-Md. Abdul Kadir and others.
Allowed
600
Begum Khaleda Zia VS The state
Rule absolute
This Site is Visited :