|
Case Number
|
Parties |
Short Description |
|
101 |
Writ Petition 3877/2009
(/W.P. No. 3877 of 2009 Jt. dt. 26.07.12 (Energy Prima Limited)) |
Energy Prima Limited Versus People’s Republic of Bangladesh and others |
|
|
102 |
In re : VC Civil Revision 15/2020 |
Md. Abdus Sobhan Sarker Vs. Md. Shahidul Kabir |
|
|
103 |
In re : VC Civil Revision 11/2020 |
Dewan Taimur Mostafa Hossain Vs. Md. Shamsur Rahman |
|
|
104 |
In re : VC Civil Revision 13/2020 |
Mst. Kajoli Bibi Vs. Mst. Rahila Khatun and another |
|
|
105 |
In re : VC Civil Revision 12/2020 |
Abu Bakkar Majhi @ Md. Abu Bakkar Majhi Vs. Mst. Salina Begum and others |
|
|
106 |
In re : VC F M A 16/2020 |
Most. Nurunnahar Begum Vs. The Government of Bangladesh represented by the Deputy Commissioner, Pabna and others |
|
|
107 |
Writ Petition 17258/2017 |
লাল মিয়া ও অন্যান্য বনাম বাংলাদেশ সরকার ও অন্যান্য |
|
|
108 |
Suo-Muto Rule 7/2019
(Suo-Muto Rule 7/2019) |
The State Vs. Ministry of law, Justice and Parliamentary Affairs, Government of Bangladesh, represented by it’s Secretary, Bangladesh Secretarat, Ramna, Dhaka and others. |
• Mobile Courts vs. Children in Bangladesh.
• Mobile Courts have no jurisdiction to try, convict and sentence any child in conflict with law. |
|
109 |
Writ Petition 16386/2018 |
Children’s Charity Bangladesh Foundation (CCB Foundation). Vs. National Human Rights Commission and others. |
• Negligence/incompetence of National Human Rights Commission (NHRC) in a particular case discussed.
• NHRC may inquire into the allegations against law enforcing agencies to some extent.
• Different aspects of NHRC in Bangladesh discussed. |
|
110 |
Writ Petition 14053/2017 |
নাহিদ আফরোজ ও অন্যান্য বনাম বাংলাদেশ সরকার ও অন্যান্য |
|
|
111 |
In re : VC Writ Petition 22/2020
(with In re : VC Writ Petition 64 of 2020 with In re : VC Writ Petition 65 of 2020 with In re : VC Writ Petition 66 of 2020 with In re : VC Writ Petition 67 of 2020) |
শেখ আব্দুল্লাহ আল মামুন বনাম বাংলাদেশ সরকার গং সংগে এ, এম, জামিউল হক গং বনাম বাংলাদেশ সরকার গং সংগে আইনুন্নাহার সিদ্দীকা গং বনাম বাংলাদেশ সরকার গং সংগে জাস্টিস ওয়াচ ফাউন্ডেশন বনাম বাংলাদেশ সরকার গং সংগে অ্যাড. মো: মাহবুবুল ইসলাম বনাম বাংলাদেশ সরকার গং |
|
|
112 |
VC Civil Revision 4468/2014
(/) |
Abdul Kader and others Vs Government of Bangladesh and others |
|
|
113 |
Company Matter 193/2019
(Company Matter 193/2019) |
Syed Nuruddin Ahmed Vs Maxwell Stamp Ltd. and others |
|
|
114 |
Company Matter 8/2019
(Company Matter 8/2019) |
Engr. Md. Anwar Hossen Vs Chittagong Club Ltd and others |
|
|
115 |
In re : VC F M A 1/2020 |
Bangladesh Power Development Board Vs Powerpac-Mutiara Keraniganj Power Plant Ltd. |
|
|
116 |
In re : VC F A 2/2020 |
Abdu alias Abdu Miah and others vs Yasnobi and others |
|
|
117 |
In re : VC Writ Petition 7/2020
(Virtual Court Writ Petition No.07 of 2020 (Annex-17)/ //United Hospital,Dhaka.) |
Niaz Muhammad Mahboob va Bangladesh and others. |
/United Hospital,Dhaka. |
|
118 |
Writ Petition 4031/2010 |
Jodge Miah and others Vs. Bangladesh and others |
|
|
119 |
Writ Petition 15090/2016
(Writ Petition 15090/2016) |
Mohammad Samiul Huq and another Vs. Government of Bangladesh, represented by the Secreatry, Ministry of Home Affairs, Bangladesh Secretariat, Ramna, Dhaka-1000 and others. |
Nipun Khela 1-10, 1-8 Charchari, Dice, Housie, Three cards, Flash, Poker etc. are gambling. Dhaka Club Ltd. and other clubs can not allow gambling in their premises. |
|
120 |
Review Petition 97/2017
(/) |
S.M. Kuddus Zaman and others Vs. Md. Nurul Islam and others |
Arpito Sampatti Pratyarpan, Rajbari |
|
121 |
Civil Revision 1116/2007 |
Amin Ahmed Vs. Umme Kulsum and others |
|
|
122 |
Civil Revision 1205/2016 |
Md. Abdul Mannan Vs. Alhaj M.A. Khair being dead his heirs: Nilufar Khair and others |
|
|
123 |
Civil Revision 1682/2015
(Nominee) |
Md. Monjurul Hoque Chowdhury and others Vs.Bilkis Ara Begum and another |
|
|
124 |
Writ Petition 11054/2015 |
Md. Lutfor Rahman and others Versus Govt. of Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Housing and Public Works, Bangladesh Secretariat, Ramna, Dhaka and others. |
An application under Article 102 of the Constitution of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh. |
|
125 |
Writ Petition 13385/2017
(/) |
S. M. Nahaz Pasha (Advocate) and others. -Vs-Government of the People’s Republic ofBangladesh represented by the Secretary, Ministryof Health, Bangladesh Secretariat, Ramna, Dhakaand others. |
|
|
126 |
Writ Petition 12514/2017
(Fatema Zohora./Bangladesh represented by the Secretary, Ministryof Health and Family Welfare Affairs, BangladeshSecretariat, Ramna, Dhaka and others.) |
|
|
|
127 |
First Appeal 256/2010 |
Mrs. Cyma Salam. -Versus- Amina Begum and others |
|
|
128 |
Death Reference 58/2013
(with Govt. Crl. Appeal No. 3 of 2014 and others appeals and Jail Appeals) |
The State Vs. R.D.O of 105 Touhidul alam, C.S-01 and others 151 persons with other appellants and respondent |
BDR Case (Mr. Justice Md. Shawkat Hossain) |
|
129 |
Death Reference 58/2013
(with Govt. Crl. Appeal No. 3 of 2014 and others appeals and Jail Appeals) |
The State Vs. R.D.O of 105 Touhidul alam, C.S-01 and others 151 persons with other appellants and respondent |
BDR Case (Mr. Justice Md. Abu Zafor Siddique) |
|
130 |
Death Reference 58/2013
(with Govt. Crl. Appeal No. 3 of 2014 and others appeals and Jail Appeals) |
The State Vs. R.D.O of 105 Touhidul alam, C.S-01 and others 151 persons with other appellants and respondent |
BDR Case (Mr. Justice Md. Nazrul Islam Talukder) |
|
131 |
Writ Petition 11849/2016 |
Mohammad Manjurul Alam Vs. Govt. of Bangladesh |
An application under Article 102 of the Constitution of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh. |
|
132 |
Writ Petition 7747/2015
(/) |
Md. Iftekhar Husain Chowdhury |
An application under Article 102 of the Constitution of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh. |
|
133 |
Writ Petition 12043/2016 |
Rawshan Ali and others Vs. Govt. of Bangladesh |
An application under Article 102 of the Constitution of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh |
|
134 |
Writ Petition 9792/2016 |
Mohammad Manjurul Alam |
An application under Article 102 of the Constitution of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh |
|
135 |
Writ Petition 1231/2018 |
Abul Kalam Azad and others |
An application under Article 102 of the Constitution of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh |
|
136 |
Writ Petition 3214/2018 |
Reaj Parvej and others |
An application under Article 102 of the Constitution of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh. |
|
137 |
Writ Petition 2013/2006
(Land Agreement) |
Karnafully Fertilizer Company Limited Vs. Govt. of Bangladesh |
|
|
138 |
Writ Petition 12977/2015
(Primary Headmaster) |
Md. Giasuddin VS Govt. of Bangladesh |
|
|
139 |
Writ Petition 14344/2017
(Primary Headmaster) |
Md. Shahjamal Sardar and others VS Govt. of Bangladesh |
|
|
140 |
Writ Petition 1613/2019 |
Human Rights and Peace for Bangladesh (HRPB) represented by its Secretary-in-charge and others. Vs. Bangladesh represented by the Cabinet Secretary, Cabinet Division and others. |
|
|
141 |
First Appeal 52/2013 |
Sree Bhuban Chandra Sutradhar and others VS Md. Afroj Afgan Choudhury and Others |
|
|
142 |
First Appeal 288/1998 |
Md. Mofazzal Hossain and others Vs. Bangladesh, represented by the Deputy Commissioner, Gazipur |
|
|
143 |
Criminal Appeal(H) 3742/2007
(with Criminal Appeal No. 3743 of 2007) |
Mir Mohammad Helal Uddin Vs. The State and another |
|
|
144 |
Writ Petition 9895/2019 |
নিগার সুলতানা বনাম বাংলাদেশ সরকার গং |
কোন ভুক্তভোগীর অভিযোগের বিষয়ে সংশ্লিষ্ট কর্তৃপক্ষ যদি দ্রুত পদক্ষেপ ও যথাযথ ব্যবস্থা গ্রহণ করে সেক্ষেত্রে একদিকে যেমন অনেক অনাকাঙ্খিত পরিস্থিতি এড়ানো সম্ভব হবে, অন্যদিকে ভুক্তভোগীদের মানসিক যাতনা, আর্থিক ক্ষতি এবং আদালতের দ্বারস্থ হওয়া থেকে রেহাই দেয়াও সম্ভব হবে।. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . সে কারণে, আদালত প্রত্যাশা করে যে, পুলিশসহ আইনশৃঙ্খলা বাহিনীর সদস্যদের বিরুদ্ধে কোন অভিযোগ উত্থাপিত হলে ঐ অভিযোগ সম্পর্কে দ্রুততার সাথে বিভাগীয় তদন্ত সম্পন্ন এবং দোষী প্রমাণিত হলে দ্রুত আইনানুগ (বিভাগীয়/ফৌজদারী) পদক্ষেপ গ্রহণ করা প্রয়োজন। আদালতের এ প্রত্যাশা বিবেচনায় নিয়ে মহা-পুলিশ পরিদর্শক এ বিষয়ে প্রয়োজনীয় কার্যকর ব্যবস্থা গ্রহণ এবং ‘আইজিপি কমপ্লেইন্টস্ মনিটরিং সেল’র কার্যক্রমকে আরো কার্যকর ও গতিশীল করবেন মর্মে আদালতের দৃঢ় বিশ্বাস। |
|
145 |
Criminal Misc 28869/2018 |
Md. Anis Hossain Prodhan alias Anis Hasan Prodhan alias Dollar Vs. The State, represented by the Deputy Commissioner Lalmonirhat |
The main criteria for constituting an offence under section 57 of the Act is that the fake or obscene information/comments or materials shall have to be published or transmitted for public in general in the website or electronic form, not for any particular individual. Accordingly, we can safely conclude that mere sending obscene or fake information through SMS from one’s cellular phone to another individual’s cellular phone cannot be construed as a publication or transmission for public in general and hence, does not constitute an offence under section 57 of the ICT Act. |
|
146 |
Criminal Misc 7609/2018 |
Md. Mahmudul Hasan Vs. The State |
Necessity of the Lawyer`s certificate |
|
147 |
Criminal Misc 46782/2019
(Criminal Misc 46782/2019) |
Md. Asaduzzaman -Vs- The State |
at the investigation stage the investigation officer has no authority to adjudicate on the propriety or credibility of a statement made by an accused under section 164 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. It has to be taken into consideration by the investigating officer as it is. It is the duty of the trial judge to examine and asses the truth, veracity and voluntariness of a statement under section 164 of the Code of Criminal Procedure made by an accused. An investigating officer cannot steps into the shoes of a trial judge. |
|
148 |
In re : Writ Petition 11794/2019 |
Md. Waliullah Apu Vs. Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh and others |
Taking notice of the above scenario, we are also constrained to direct the 1) Secretary, Cabinet Division, 2) the Secretary (সুরক্ষা ও সেবা), Ministry of Home Affairs and all the 3) District Magistrate to take necessary steps for providing the certified copies of the documents and order passed by the Executive Magistrate acted under Mobile Court Act,2009 to the concerned person/convict within a period of 05(five) days from the date of receiving the application for the same |
|
149 |
Civil Rule 564/2019 |
সিফার্ড ইন্ডাষ্ট্রিজ লিমিটেড বনাম জিয়াসু সিটিজ ইসেন কোঃ লিঃ |
|
|
150 |
Criminal Misc 40388/2019 |
মো: মাসুদুল হক মাসুদ বনাম রাষ্ট্র |
উপরোক্ত আলোচনা এবং সার্বিক অবস্থা বিবেচনায় আদালত আদেশ প্রদান করছে যে, মাদকদ্রব্য নিয়ন্ত্রন আইনের ধারা ৪৪ অনুসারে ট্রাইব্যুনাল প্রতিষ্ঠা কিংবা গেজেট প্রকাশের মাধ্যমে বিকল্প আদালতকে ক্ষমতা না দেয়া অথবা ট্রাইব্যুনাল সংক্রান্ত আইনের বিধান সংশোধন না হওয়া পর্যন্ত মাদক দ্রব্য নিয়ন্ত্রন আইন ২০১৮ এর অধীনে দায়েরকৃত সকল মামলার বিচারিক কার্যক্রম ফৌজদারী কার্যবিধি ধারা ৫(২) অনুসরনে ঐ কার্যবিধির ২য় তপসিলে উল্লেখিত “অন্যান্য আইনসমূহের অধীনে অপরাধ (offences against other laws)” বিধান অনুযায়ী পরিচালিত হবে। |
