3
Judgment : High Court Division
(If you feel problem with font, please, download Bangla font from Downloads Link)
 
Case Category : 
Case Type
Case Number
Year
Parties
Short Description
 

Case Number Parties Short Description
1 Md. Akramul Ahsan Kanchan Vs Government of Bangladesh and others এজাহার/অভিযোগ দায়ের করার ক্ষেত্রে জাতীয় পরিচয় পত্র/পাসপোর্ট নম্বর ব্যবহার সম্পর্কিত নির্দেশনা।
2 তানজিন বৃষ্টি বনাম বাংলাদেশ সরকার ও অন্যান্য
3 Md. Ahsan Habib Vs Government of the People`s Republic of Bangladesh Present: Mr. Justice Md. Nazrul Islam Talukder And Mr. Justice Mohi Uddin Shamim
4 M. Asafuddowlah Vs. Government of Bangladesh, represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Public Administration, Bangladesh Secretariat, Dhaka. The current trend of making/posting the Civil Servents as Officers on Special Duty (OSD) without assigning any special duty, whatsoever, beyond the scope of Circular No. Sa.Ma/ (Bi:Pro:)-12-90-03(200) dated 03.10.1991 and keeping them as OSD for unlimited period longer than the periods prescribed in the said Circular dated 03.10.1991.
5 Barrister Md. Aminul Hoque Vs The State and another
6 Abdul Mazid Talukder and others Vs. Abdul Kader and others Evidentiary value of Pantograph prepared by Survey- expert.
7 Shirajul Islam Mollah and another Vs. Bangladesh Bank and others A decision per-incurium is not a binding precedent.
When the Suit itself is barred by law, malafide can not be examined.
8 আব্দুল লতিফ বনাম মোহাম্মদ কামাল উদ্দীন এবং অন্যান্য দালিলিক স্বাক্ষ্য গ্রহণ, চিহ্নিত করন, সাক্ষ্য মূল্য ইত্যাদি।
দেওয়ানী মামলা প্রমানের মানদন্ড।
9 DanishFoodsLtdvsThe registrarDepartment of Patents
10 মোঃ আতাউর রহমান ওরফে আতাউর রহমান বনাম বাংলাদেশ সরকার গং সামগ্রিক অবস্থা বিবেচনায় নিয়ে আদালতের সুষ্পষ্ট ও সুনির্দিষ্ট অভিমত এই যে, দুর্নীতি দমন কমিশন সহ বিভিন্ন তদন্ত সংস্থা ও আইন শৃঙ্খলা রক্ষাকারী বাহিনীর উচিত হবে যে, অনুসন্ধান বা তদন্ত পর্যায়ে যে কোন অপরাধের সাথে জড়িত সন্দেহভাজন কোন ব্যক্তিকে দেশ ত্যাগে বারিত করার জন্য অবিলম্বে প্রয়োজনীয় আইন বা বিধি প্রনয়ন করা; এবং যতক্ষন পর্যন্ত এই ধরনের আইন বা বিধি প্রণয়ন করা না হবে ততক্ষন পর্যন্ত অন্তবর্তী ব্যবস্থা হিসেবে এখতিয়ার সম্পন্ন আদালতের নিকট এ ধরনের বারিত আদেশ প্রার্থনা করা এবং আদালতের অনুমতি গ্রহণ করা।
11 আভ্যন্তরীণ নৌ পরিবহন কর্তৃপক্ষ বনাম মোহাহের হোসেন বিশ্বাস
12 Spice Television Private Limited vs. The Government of Bangladesh and others Regarding allocation of frequency in favour of the petitioner’s Television Channel namely Spice Television Limited (Spice TV)
13 Syed Ahmed Ali Aziz Vs. The Secretary, Ministry of Housing and Public Works, Bangladesh Secretariat, Dhaka and others Regarding action of the respondents in cancelling the lease.
14 Md. Anis Miah vs The State
15 Abdus Salam Vs. Government of Bangladesh and others The question of bias or prejudice requires to be established and it cannot be inferred. It would have to be decided on the facts of each case. There could not be any general proposition of law to be laid down that in every case where the informant was the investigator, the trial is vitiated and the accused is entitled to acquittal. The matter has to be decided on a case to case basis without any universal generalisation.
16 savar thana osohai poribar ponurbason bohumukhi somobai somiti limited vs biggo judge orpito sompotti pottarpon appellate tribunal Dhaka and others
17 Anti-Corruption Commission -Vs- Md. Abul Kashem and others We have no other option but to hold that since section 10(4) of the Act of 1958 has authorised the Commission only to withdraw a case, the Government has nothing to do in such matter as the provision of section 494 of the Code shall not be applicable or come into play in respect of the scheduled offences under the Act of 2004 which are triable by the Special Judge constituted under the Act of 1958.
18 Banu, wife of late Md. Yasin, 13 Huts, Tejgaon Non-Local Relief Camp, 10/A, Post Office Mirpur-1216, Pallabi, Dhaka VS Bangladesh represented by the Secretary, Ministry of Home Affairs, Bangladesh Secretariat, Secretariat Building, Ramna, Dhaka and others. On an application under article 102 of the Constitution of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh, this Rule Nisi was issued calling upon the respondents to show cause as to why the detenue, namely, Md. Arman, now being detained in Kashimpur Jail-2 should not be brought before this court so as to it may satisfy itself that, he is not being held in custody/jail without lawful authority or in an unlawful manner and to set him at liberty and to declare the detention/ confinement of the detenue to be without lawful authority and is of no legal effect and why the respondents should not be directed or award appropriate compensation to the detenue for wrongful confinement and/or pass such other or further order or orders as to this court may seem fit and proper.
19 A.K.M Asiful Haque Vs. Secretary, Law and Justice and Division, Ministry of Law, Justice and Parliamentary Affairs and others The words “public trial” denote public access to the court proceedings. In other words, public trial reflects “open justice” and any trial that grants access to the court or the venue at which court proceedings would take place will be regarded as “public trial”.

Article 35(3) of the Constitution of the people’s republic of Bangladesh mandates that the criminal proceeding of a court or tribunal shall be held in public. Public means, for the use of everyone without discrimination. Anything, gathering or audience which is not private is public. Obviously, a Judge’s Chamber is not a court hall to which the public will normally have any right of access. Courtrooms are considered as public place as opposed to the Judge’s Chambers for the simple reason that the Judicial Officers, the parties and their Counsels and any interested member of the public has unrestricted ‘access’ to it. With all due respect, if the Judge granted unrestricted access to his chamber to the parties and their Counsels and any interested member of the public, the chamber would move from a ‘private’ place to a ‘public place’. Same conditions when available in a remote hearing i.e access being granted to and available to Judicial Officers, the parties and their Counsels and any interested member of the public will make the venue of such remote/virtual hearing be it zoom, skype, whatsApp etc. a public place in line with the provisions of Article 35(3) of the Constitution. It is our opinion, therefore, that the apprehension whether remote hearings are in conformity with the constitutional requirement that the proceeding be in public, the answer would be that the Constitution did not say that such proceedings must be in a physical structure called a Courtroom. Once the proceeding in a remote/Virtual hearing through video conferencing is made accessible to everyone involved and any interested member of the public, then the condition as provided by Article 35(3) would be complied with.
20 A A M Ziaur Rahman Vs. Bangladesh and others Direction given to conduct trial of all cases under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 only by the Courts of Joint Sessions Judges.
21 Javed Iqbal Khan VS Haji Md. Bahauddin
22 Amzad Hossain alais Nahid VS The State.
23 Saleha Khanam and two others versus Shamsul Haque and others
24 Md. Moti Matbor vs The State Narcotics Control Act,1990. Possession of 411 pieces of yaba tablets weighing 37.65 grams. `purity` test or `whole substance` test. Probation under Section 5 of the Probation of Offenders Ordinance, 1960
25 Sahanaz parvin -Vs- The Government of Bangladesh and others ভূয়া গ্রেফতারি পরোয়ানা রোধে নির্দেশনা সমূহ।
26 Human Rights and Peace for Bangladesh -Vs- Government of Bangladesh and others এ প্রসঙ্গে উল্লেখ করা আবশ্যক যে, সম্মানিত আইন প্রনেতাগণ আইন, ২০০০ প্রণয়নের ক্ষেত্রে বর্তমান প্রেক্ষাপট এবং ভবিষ্যতের প্রয়োজন অনুধাবন করে এ আইনটি প্রণয়ন করেছেন এবং এই আইনের ২ (চ) ধারায় প্রাকৃতিক জলাধার এর আওতায় মহানগী, বিভাগীয় শহর ও জেলা শহরের পৌর এলাকাসহ দেশের সকল পৌর এলাকার মাষ্টার প্লানে চিহ্নিত নদী, খাল, বিল, দীঘি, ঝর্ণা বা জলাশয় অথবা সরকার, স্থানীয় সরকার বা কোন সংস্থান কর্তৃক, সরকারী গেজেটে প্রজ্ঞাপন দ্বারা বন্যা প্রবাহ এলাকা হিসাবে ঘোষিত প্রাকৃতিক জলাধারের আওতায় আনা হয়েছে। এছাড়া সলল পানি এবঙ বৃষ্টির পানি ধারণ করে এমন কোন ভূমিও উক্ত প্রাকৃতিক জলাধারের আওতাভূক্ত করা হয়েছে। এক্ষেত্রে ব্যক্তি মালিকানাধীন কোন পুকুরকে উক্ত সংজ্ঞা থেকে বাদ দেয়া হয়নি বরং ইহা উক্ত আইনের ২ (চ) ধারায় প্রাকৃতিক জলাধারের সংজ্ঞাভূক্ত করা হয়েছে।
27 Rokib @ Rakibur Rahman vs The State
28 Marrine Vegetable Oil ltd and Jasmir Vegetable Oil Limited vs Bangladesh Oil Gas
29 Md.Ibrahim vs the Government of Bangladesh
30 The state vs secretary, Ministry of land, Bangladesh sochibaloy,Dhaka and others
31 Md. Ershad Ali @ Md. Ershad Ullah Vs. The State and another
32 Uthpal Kumar Roy and three others Vs. Meghnad Shaha and another The tribunal shall not take cognizance or frame charge of an offence punishable under section 11 (Ga) or 11(Ga)/30 of the Ain, 2000 against an accused without having a medical examination certificate from Government Hospital or any private Hospital, recognized by the Government for that purpose in view of the provision under section 32 of the said Ain in support of simple hurt of the victim wife.
33 মাধবদী বাজার কমিটি ও মার্চেন্ট এ‌্যাসোসিয়েশন ও অন্য বনাম বাংলাদেশ সরকার ও অন্যান্য
34 Orascom Telecom Bangladesh Limited Vs. Bangladesh Telecommunication Regulatory Commission, Represented by its Chairman, IEB Bhaban, Ramna, Dhaka-1000 and others.
35 Mahmudul Hasan Vs The State and another
36 The State vs Oli
37 Md. Billal Hossain and another vs Md. ShawkatAli and ten others
38 Md. Abdur Razzaque and twelve others vs Md. Kabir Hossain and two others
39 Md. Hafiz Ibrahim vs The State and another
40 Kalon vs The State
41 Siddique Farazi vs The State
42 Rezwanur Rab Zia VS The State and another Section 65 of the Evidence Act does not provide any power to the Court to treat or admit a private document as primary or secondary evidence upon an application of either of the parties to a judicial proceeding without any formal proof thereof.
43 Abdul Quddus Khan Salafi Vs. The State
44 Md. Ibrahim Vs. The State The Registrar General of Bangladesh Supreme Court is hereby directed to issue a “General Circular” to all the Judges/ Magistrates having exercising criminal jurisdiction containing the following directions:
1. The Court below shall not cancel the bail of an accused granted by the High Court Division without any allegation of proven misuse of the privilege of bail by the accused.
2. When an accused is enjoying the privilege of ad-interim bail granted by the High Court Division for a limited period in a pending rule under section 498 of the Cr.P.C or in an appeal against under special law and he/she is regularly appearing before the Court below, his/her bail shall not be cancelled and cannot be taken him/her into jail custody by the Court below only on the ground that he/she could not submit bail extension order from the High Court Division.
3. In the event of unavailability of such extension order, the Courts below must wait for the result of the rule or the appeal, as the case may be, in which the accused was granted ad-interim bail.
4. Learned Judges of the Courts below shall not cancel bail of an accused granted by the High Court Division in pending rule or appeal until and unless the rule is discharged or the appeal is dismissed or in any way the accused violates any condition of bail, if any, imposed by the High Court Division at the time of granting bail”
45 Zahanara Begum-Vs- The State and another
46 Md. Anwar Hossain-Vs-the State
47 Syeda Hamza- Vs- The State
48 Abdul Quddus Khan Salafi Vs The State
49 নাদিম জারার বনাম বাংলাদেশ সরকার ও অন্যান্য
50 Mrs. Sitara Siddiq Vs. Government of the people’s Republic of Bangladesh and others
This Site is Visited :